TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The IRS agents found evidence to investigate Joe Biden for financial crimes. Despite claims of no evidence linking Joe to Hunter Biden's businesses, the speaker believes it is untrue.

After Hunter Biden's guilty plea, IRS whistleblowers expressed disbelief at an internal email praising the conviction, highlighting a perceived double standard in how sensitive investigations are handled, especially for powerful individuals. They confirmed that the "big guy" referenced in emails was Joe Biden and noted that both the DOJ and FBI were aware of the legitimacy of Hunter's laptop long before the 2020 election. They alleged that political influence affected their investigation, with additional approvals required for high-profile cases. The whistleblowers have faced retaliation from the IRS and are now pursuing legal action against Hunter Biden's attorney for defamation. They emphasized the importance of restoring public confidence in fair justice, regardless of status, and acknowledged the personal toll of their whistleblowing efforts.

After Hunter Biden's guilty plea, IRS whistleblowers expressed disbelief at an internal email praising the conviction, highlighting perceived bias in IRS investigations. They alleged that "sensitive investigations" favor powerful individuals, requiring excessive approvals for cases like Biden's while allowing quicker actions against ordinary taxpayers. They confirmed that the FBI and DOJ knew Hunter's laptop was legitimate but were restricted from pursuing certain investigative steps due to the election. The whistleblowers believe there’s a double standard in how investigations are conducted based on political connections. They have faced retaliation for their disclosures, impacting their careers and personal lives, yet they maintain that their actions were justified to uphold public confidence in the justice system.

Critics of the investigation claim there is no evidence, but there are 176 suspicious activity reports and witness testimony. The most damning evidence so far is the discovery of transactions that went to Joe Biden, where the money was spent on his behalf. This implicates him directly. Additionally, there is a cover-up happening within the FBI and Department of Justice. Federal prosecutors were being stonewalled, which is unprecedented according to Scott Brady. This suggests that elements within these agencies were protecting the president. These are the two significant pieces of evidence uncovered, and further investigation will continue to follow the evidence.

The Durham report failed to address the issue of Russia's involvement in disseminating hacked emails to benefit Donald Trump. It focused on internal FBI files and only conducted a preliminary investigation. The report also discussed the Steele dossier, which led to convictions of six individuals connected to the Trump campaign. However, the report neglected to mention the FBI whistleblowers, who were deemed national security risks.

A whistleblower's client, whose identity remains undisclosed, helped conduct an investigation related to Hunter Biden. The investigation, which CBS News has learned about, focuses on Hunter Biden. A few years ago, Joe Biden expressed his willingness to cooperate with the world. However, after the Department of Justice initiated an investigation into his finances, the FBI gathered evidence that they believed could lead to tax crime charges against Hunter Biden. The findings were then sent to the US attorney in Delaware. Since then, there has been no further information or updates.

After Hunter Biden's guilty plea, IRS whistleblowers expressed disbelief at an internal email praising the conviction, highlighting a perceived disparity in how the IRS treats investigations involving powerful individuals. They noted that sensitive investigations require extra approvals, creating a double standard. The whistleblowers confirmed that both the IRS and FBI knew Hunter Biden's laptop was legitimate long before the 2020 election, yet it was labeled as disinformation to influence the election outcome. They alleged that the Biden family benefited financially from Hunter's business dealings, asserting that there is substantial evidence of access and influence. Despite facing retaliation from the IRS, they remain committed to their cause, emphasizing the need for public confidence in fair justice administration.

Hunter Biden's plea deal was rejected by Judge Mary Ellen Norika, forcing him to plead not guilty and stay off drugs. Recent revelations from IRS whistleblowers exposed preferential treatment and millions of dollars in payments to the Bidens' foreign shell companies. Hunter's associate, Devin Archer, is set to testify about incriminating emails and phone calls with Joe Biden. The media tried to dismiss the investigation as a "clown show," but evidence continues to pile up. This scandal has dangerous implications and raises concerns about having a compromised commander in chief. The American people deserve the truth, and we must demand it. This is far from over.

The case against Trump involving classified documents is over. The FBI turned off body cameras at Mar a Lago, brought fake cover sheets, and illegally appointed Jack Smith as special counsel. These actions make a trial impossible.

Two IRS employees have blown the whistle on the federal government's unequal treatment of taxpayers when enforcing tax laws. They were investigating Hunter Biden, not on anyone's orders, but as part of their regular work. The IRS recommended charges against Hunter Biden for tax crimes, including attempted tax evasion, fraud, false statements, and failure to file returns or pay taxes. These crimes involved around $2.2 million in unreported taxes on global income from Ukraine, Romania, and China, totaling $17.3 million from 2014 to 2019. Hunter Biden personally received $8.3 million.

The biggest misconception about the Hunter Biden case is that he committed felony tax offenses while under the influence of drugs. This is false; he filed false tax returns during a period when he claimed to be newly sober in his book. A comparison of his statements in the book and the information on the tax returns reveals inconsistencies.

The investigation found no evidence of President Biden violating laws on classified materials. The Espionage Act was analyzed, but exoneration was not confirmed. The discussion was cut short due to time constraints. Translation: The investigation cleared President Biden of any wrongdoing regarding classified materials under the Espionage Act, but the discussion was stopped due to time constraints.

I'm still waiting for proof of Joe Biden enriching himself, especially regarding his son and brother. Despite four years of investigation during Trump's presidency, no charges have been made. If there was evidence of wrongdoing, charges should have followed. A Chinese company did transfer money to Hunter and Jim Biden's shell companies, which then funneled money to their personal accounts, including a $40,000 check to Joe Biden. However, the lack of charges raises questions about the validity of these claims. Until there are actual charges, this discussion remains open. Thank you for joining us; stay tuned for more.

The report has been released and it may not have fully satisfied some Republicans, but it does provide some level of exoneration for Donald Trump.

A supervisory special agent at the IRS is set to testify before Congress, claiming that his investigation has been hindered due to what he perceives as special treatment. He does not provide specific details about his client or the target of the investigation. However, it has been revealed that the whistleblower's investigation is related to Hunter Biden. Two years ago, Biden stated that he was fully cooperating with the DOJ's investigation into his finances, as the FBI had gathered enough evidence to potentially charge him with tax crimes.

After Hunter Biden's guilty plea, IRS whistleblowers expressed disbelief at an internal email praising the conviction, highlighting a perceived double standard in the agency's treatment of taxpayers. They noted that investigations into powerful individuals, like Biden, required excessive approvals, while ordinary cases did not. Both whistleblowers confirmed that the "big guy" mentioned in communications referred to Joe Biden, and they criticized the suppression of evidence related to Hunter's laptop, which they and the DOJ knew was legitimate. They argued that the Justice Department's actions reflected a bias against political figures and emphasized the need for public confidence in fair justice. Despite facing retaliation, they remain committed to their cause, asserting that their disclosures were justified and necessary for accountability.

The former president is being accused of converting a misdemeanor into a felony by the borough district attorney. However, two previous prosecutorial agencies have already examined the case and found nothing. This attack on the former president seems baseless and exaggerated, especially considering my experience as a prosecutor and defense attorney. It appears to be an over-the-top move.

Prosecutors are accused of tampering with evidence by changing document sequences from Mar a Lago. The attorney general denies this claim, stating it is an ongoing dispute in court. Jack Smith admitted mishandling documents in a court filing, leading to questions about his role as special counsel. The attorney general defers to the court for resolution. The case is now stalled due to errors made.

The speaker connects Jeffrey Epstein to a broad web of influence and alleged illicit activity across several decades. Key points presented: - Epstein’s involvement is linked to the BCCI network, and to foreign policy activities in the Middle East during the 1990s, plus his alleged ties to high-level officials across Israeli, Saudi, British, and French governments, spanning the Clinton era into the early 2000s. - Epstein was investigated by the SEC in the 1980s and was one of the two people who ran the largest Ponzi scheme in U.S. history at that time, tied to the Towers Financial collapse. Epstein’s business partner went to jail for twenty-something years, while Epstein allegedly “skates completely free.” - He is said to have been involved in a billion-dollar fraud case in the U.S. Virgin Islands, with allegations that his campaigns funded local politicians there and that prosecutors answered to those politicians. - The speaker suggests Epstein’s pervasive presence—“always in the room” in four decades of American foreign policy and intelligence activity—implies a systemic concern about money sourcing for that activity. - Regarding Epstein’s crimes, the concern cited is the same one discussed with Orlando Massfer: don’t bring the case, and if you do, bring it in a highly limited way. - This culminated in the 2006 indictment, which was described as a “sweetheart plea deal” that limited prosecutions, protected coconspirators known and unknown, and allowed the case to proceed quickly before a full trial could uncover broader lines of evidence about Epstein’s network.

John Nance and Hogan DeGidley discuss a recent FBI case and press conference. Patel’s FBI has been extremely transparent, and that transparency will continue to reassure the American people that information regarding this subject will flow as appropriate without jeopardizing the prosecution of the case. A key takeaway is the suggestion that forensic evidence could be the linchpin to identifying the suspect, despite millions of data lines to review; pieces such as DNA or a fingerprint related to the pipe bombs themselves may have been the actual “smoking gun.” There is emphasis on teamwork and the idea that information had been left to collect dust rather than being newly uncovered. AG Merrick Garland’s remarks are cited, highlighting that the evidence leading to the arrest had been sitting at the FBI for years. The FBI, along with US Attorney Piro and prosecutors, worked tirelessly for months sifting through evidence that had been at the FBI with the Biden administration for four years. The point is made that there was no new tip or new witness, just diligent police work and prosecutorial effort. Hogan DeGidley asks why the case wasn’t cracked during President Biden’s four years in office. The response suggests that it either couldn’t be done or wouldn’t be done, and that the American people suffered as a result. It is stated that this did not come from new evidence but from information already in the bureau and departments being sifted through. The discussion frames the case as a win for the administration, the FBI, and the DOJ, and a step toward transparency, accountability, and justice. They note that the attackers placed pipe bombs at both the RNC and DNC locations; the motives remain unknown, and questions about a possible Antifa link or other theories are mentioned as preliminary. Cash Patel is quoted as saying the FBI has committed to being the most transparent law enforcement operation in U.S. history while ensuring accountability in the courts with U.S. Attorneys and prosecutors. The aim is to divulge information when prudent and constitutionally permissible, safeguarding the case, to secure the nation’s capital and allow Americans to live in safe, secure neighborhoods. This is attributed to leadership from the FBI Washington Field Office. John Nance comments that Patel is doing a very good job and that the director’s social-media transparency is notable. He expresses encouragement about the FBI’s reform efforts and notes that the White House press narrative around January 6 is seen as misaligned with the pipe-bomb case. The arrest took place in Woodbridge, Virginia, a wealthy DMV suburb, prompting remarks about why the dots weren’t connected sooner.

The FBI's politicized hacks aimed to bring down Donald Trump, with the help of Hillary Clinton's campaign. The report revealed that Trump's political opponents provided leads for the investigation, relying on a fabricated dossier. While we reported on this, other media outlets downplayed it. Unfortunately, there were no consequences for those involved in the Crossfire Hurricane operation. In fact, they were emboldened and repeated their actions in 2022, this time protecting Hunter Biden.