TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

FEMA will play a pivotal role in the shelter and services program, which is set to distribute $363 million to cities and communities in need of funding. However, neither the speaker nor FEMA currently possesses the necessary funds to last through the season.

The United Nations is providing $1.6 billion to 17 Latin American countries to assist migrants from Venezuela, including illegal migrants, through debit cards funded by US taxpayers. This is part of a larger initiative to spend $1.59 billion to help 3 million people in 17 countries. The UN is supporting and rewarding individuals who have violated US law by facilitating and funding their migration.

FEMA has been providing $750 for people who need immediate needs being met.

I just signed a $200,000,000 drawdown from the Department of Defense for Ukraine. It will be coming quickly. Thank you.

The United Nations is confirmed to be funding the migrant crisis, as revealed by the Center for Immigration Studies. Public documents show that the United Nations plans to allocate $372 million in cash and voucher assistance to approximately 624,000 immigrants heading to the United States in 2024. This information eliminates any need for speculation, and the article link is provided for further reading.

According to a new report by the US House Committee on Homeland Security majority, the annual cost for housing and caring for asylum seekers is estimated to be $451 billion. This includes expenses for both their accommodation and general welfare.

The UK spends £54 billion annually on defense, yet the number of military-age males entering the country illegally by small boats has surpassed the total number of soldiers in the British Army.

FEMA has been providing $750 for people who need immediate needs being met.

The speaker is in Brussels for critical discussions with friends and partners from the humanitarian community about providing life-saving aid to the world’s most vulnerable people and making concrete commitments to turn ideas into action. Since 2017, more than 6,000,000 Venezuelans have sought refuge in 17 countries across the region, representing the largest displacement in the Western Hemisphere. At the 2023 International Conference in Solidarity with Venezuelan Refugees and Migrants, the United States announced more than 171,000,000 in humanitarian assistance and development funding to respond to the needs of vulnerable Venezuelans in their own country, Venezuelan refugees and migrants, and the generous communities that host them across the region. The speaker expresses being inspired by the stories of strength and resilience of Venezuelan refugees and migrants and pride in the United States’ role as the largest single donor to this crisis response. The United States is highlighted as the largest single donor of humanitarian assistance worldwide. The speaker looks forward to next week’s European Humanitarian Forum, where government representatives, international organizations, non-governmental organizations, and others will collaborate on issues such as refugee resettlement, humanitarian diplomacy, and forced displacement. Addressing the unprecedented 100,000,000 persons now displaced worldwide will require additional aid and support from new and nontraditional donors, as well as new ideas and approaches. The speaker stresses that no single country can address all needs alone, and that the only way forward is together. Gratitude is extended to the European Union for bringing everyone together for these discussions. The challenges ahead are described as formidable, but equally strong is the will to overcome them. The speaker affirms confidence that, together, progress can be made.

According to a report by the US House Committee on Homeland Security Majority, the annual cost for housing and caring for asylum seekers is $451 billion. This includes both their accommodation and general welfare.

I am responsible for addressing the root causes of migration from Central American countries by coordinating a strategy to keep people from leaving. We have raised $3.2 billion to assist those in need.

Speaker 0: In time, Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we're gonna be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not gonna be the monolithic societies that they once were in the last century. Speaker 1: Now, I think we have a moral and political and social and economic obligation to look after refugees. You can't you have three alternatives. Leave them on the beaches. Send them back to have their throats slit in Syria, or let them walk up to the Balkans into razor wire borders, or welcome them. Those are the only alternatives. Speaker 0: Jews are gonna be at the center of that. It's a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive. Speaker 2: There are 65,000,000 displaced people in the world right now. Matthew, that number is larger than the population of The United Kingdom, and it's not getting any smaller. What we've seen here is that governments are absolutely feckless in attempting to broker peace agreements, be it Syria or anywhere else, which has created this. Speaker 3: Billionaire George Soros says he's investing $500,000,000 to start ups founded by refugees. Soros is responding to president Barack Obama's call to action initiative. That's a request for companies to help refugees and migrants. Speaker 4: And Norwegian society has a very a very short history with ethnic minorities at a scale. So there is a job to be done. So we do have rising antisemitism, and we have rising antisignism, and we have Islamophobia, and we have racism. So we have a lot to do. So we still have have a need of NGOs like the center against racism. Speaker 5: But then he dismissed out of hand what the Prime Minister is doing in relation to migration. Now, I happen to believe that people in this country don't want to pull the drawbridges up, actually. But they do want a fair system. They don't want a free fall. They don't like this sense that people can come here and take us for a ride. And the point, Evan, is this. That in other member states, they have a contributory system of social insurance. I've seen it and discussed it in different contexts. So that people are sort of working and paying their taxes and putting in before they have the right to take out. Speaker 6: The European Union was intentionally set up to give minority organizations influence on the management of Europe. Harry Truman read an article about Kalergi in 1945. He was so impressed that he adopted the Kalergi plan as US official policy as well. After 1965, the real demographic changes of European countries would be seen. Brock Schisholm, former director of the World Health Organization said, what people in all places have to do is to limit a birth rate and promote mixed marriages between different races. This aims to create a single race in the world which will be directed by a central authority. Speaker 7: Very clear that the Jews want to exterminate the European race and that the means to weakening the European race would be to dissolve all the European nations, destroy all their cultural heritage and their national traditions and replace that with the European Union and then to invite in Africans, Middle Easterners and Asians to dilute the blood of Europeans through miscegenation to the point where they became a degenerate mixed race.

$2,000,000 in FEMA funds has been allocated to undocumented immigrants in California for holiday travel. Meanwhile, U.S. citizens affected by floods and hurricanes receive no assistance for the holidays. This situation highlights a perceived prioritization of illegal immigrants over American citizens during a time of need.

FEMA will play a pivotal role in the shelter and services program, which is set to distribute $363 million to cities and communities in need. However, neither the speaker nor FEMA currently possesses the necessary funds to last through the season.

More than 25% of the annual federal deficit is spent taking care of illegal immigrants. In 2023, the total outlay was $6.1 trillion, the total revenue was $4.4 trillion, and the federal deficit was $1.7 trillion. In 2023, $451 billion was spent taking care of illegal immigrants, which is 26.5% of the $1.7 trillion deficit. If the border was secure and there was control over who enters the country, 26.5% could be cut from the deficit. This is especially important because the money is borrowed, meaning interest will be paid on it. In 2023, $451 billion was borrowed to support illegals, and interest will be paid on that amount.

I just signed a $200 million drawdown from the Department of Defense for Ukraine. It will be coming quickly. Thank you.

California has recently expanded health care benefits for migrants aged 26 to 49, which will cover an additional 700,000 individuals at an annual cost of $2.6 billion. This decision adds to California's existing deficit, which stands at $68 billion.

FEMA is not and should never be an illegal alien resettlement agency. In fiscal year 23, $735,000,000 was allocated to the shelter and services program. In fiscal year 24, $650,000,000 was allocated for a housing program and other services for illegal aliens, totaling $1.5 billion. The proposed bill would take any unspent FEMA funds from this housing program for illegal aliens and give it to the victims of Hurricane Helene.

I'm announcing over $1 billion in new humanitarian support for Africans displaced by droughts and food insecurity. African leaders and citizens are looking for more than just aid; they seek investment. The United States is enhancing its relationship with Africa, shifting from assistance to partnership, and focusing on investment and trade.

We spent $9 billion to resettle around 90,000 Afghan refugees since the fall of Afghanistan, averaging about $100,000 per person, which seems excessive. My question is, why are we providing any funds when we don't even have an embassy or diplomats in Afghanistan? The funds we provide come through partners like UN agencies and NGOs. We could apply that reasoning to all foreign aid, including funds going to foreign adversaries.

Secretary: Today, we are announcing that we have stopped all grant funding that's being abused by NGOs to facilitate illegal immigration into this country. It's amazing to me the hundreds of millions of dollars that have been spent by the federal government that has been sent to NGOs to facilitate this invasion of our country. I have taken action to stop that funding, to reevaluate it, and to make sure that we're actually using taxpayer dollars in a way that strengthens this country and keeps us safe. People are curious how grants given out by federal agencies are utilized, and that evaluation needs to be done. We're not spending another dime to help the destruction of this country. We're going to follow through on what president Trump promised, to secure our border, depart those who are here illegally and committing criminal actions, and ensure taxpayer dollars aren't spent to assist it. Speaker: And, Madam Secretary, I don't think people fully understand the role that NGOs play in facilitating illegal immigration. I want to share these numbers up on the screen: we spend over $380,000,000 in 2024 for sheltering and service programs for illegal immigrants. But the vast network of NGOs that help facilitate it through Panama, through Mexico, and make it a landing spot here in the United States is a massive contributor to illegal immigration. So what you're telling us today is that now stops? At least the federal funding of that stops? Secretary: Yes. The Department of Homeland Security has stopped spending those dollars to fund those NGOs. What’s been revealing is that many of these NGOs actually have infrastructure and operations set up in Mexico on that side of the border, telling illegal immigrants to come to them, and they will get them across the border. So they're not just operating in the United States. They're operating outside of the United States to help make it easier for those who want to break our laws. And while I was one of those Americans years ago when somebody said NGO to me, I thought, oh, that's amazing—a nonprofit telling somebody about Jesus or spreading faith and charitable work, helping people less fortunate. Then I realized over the years it's been perverted into this shadow government. An NGO is sometimes an operation that does things the government cannot do, can't legally do, so they create an entity to use government dollars, taxpayer dollars, to do something that the federal government isn't allowed to do—to perform a shadow government operation that has recently been used to undermine our country's national security.

According to a new report by the US House Committee on Homeland Security majority, the annual cost for housing and caring for asylum seekers is estimated to be $451 billion. This includes expenses for both their accommodation and general welfare.

According to the Federation For American Immigration, the federal government spent $66 billion on illegal immigrants in 2023, compared to $3 billion on homeless veterans. The speaker questioned why this allocation makes sense, suggesting the numbers are comparable. The speaker itemized $5.8 billion in SNAP, $10 billion in Medicare, $8.2 billion in uncompensated hospital expenditures, and $3 billion for primary and secondary education for illegal immigrants. The speaker suggested redirecting funds from the $66 billion to address veterans' needs, such as the White House's requested $13 million for a national call center for homeless veterans, $17.2 billion for veterans' mental health, and $2.9 billion for caregiver support programs. The speaker claimed the Biden administration is responsible for the current allocation of funds.

According to a new report by the US House Committee on Homeland Security majority, the annual cost for housing and caring for asylum seekers is estimated to be $451 billion. This includes expenses for both their accommodation and general welfare.

The speaker describes a massive UN and NGO–driven immigration infrastructure in Mexico and Central America. In Tapachula, Mexico, the UNHCR is constructing a 75,000 square foot “illegal immigration mall” on Mexican land, with the UN and various NGOs under one roof. There is also a large tent city space, indicating a planned, long-term hub for migrants. The speaker notes similar NGO complexes in Colombia and Panama, where NGO villages resemble big swap meets with storefronts for different organizations and permanent billboards directing immigrants to resources needed to continue their journey. They claim hundreds of NGOs operate in the region, including US NGOs, European NGOs, and Latin American NGOs, many affiliated with Catholic dioceses or well-known groups like Doctors Without Borders. These NGOs are described as receiving substantial US taxpayer money to build a cross-border safety net, facilitated by UN agencies and then doled out to national NGOs via US appropriations from the State Department, USAID, and related sources. Financial figures are presented to illustrate the scale: $1.9 billion spent in 2024, $2.2 billion in the previous year, and about $45 billion over the last few years, with 2019 at $377 million in comparison. The speaker suggests this funding is intended to sustain a long-term, high-volume flow of migration from South America to the US border, with Tapachula identified as a key strategic city and the surrounding NGO towns on the migration corridor highlighted as part of the infrastructure. The speaker contends the operations are designed with an expectation of a political outcome, stating they are “betting on a Harris win” and that the system would halt “within an hour of his inauguration” if certain policies were enacted. Specifically, they claim the remain-in-Mexico policy could be immediately implemented, with orders to border patrol and possible invocation of Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to push back and deny asylum to 100% of border crossers. The claim is that this would deter migrants from attempting entry, and that the migrants themselves are closely watching US politics, with many believing that if Trump is in office, entry and asylum access would be substantially harder. The speaker observes that about 50,000 to 60,000 migrants arrive at the border monthly, noting a socioeconomic stratification: wealthier migrants tend to pay human smugglers to reach the border, while the poorer migrants—often from lower-income backgrounds—struggle to finance the final stages of the journey, sometimes needing to borrow or sell assets to reach Mexico, where the poorest end up on the streets in Tapachula. They remark that some nationalities, such as many Chinese and Venezuelans, are described as wealthier within this context.