reSee.it - Related Video Feed

When people received their first COVID nineteen vaccine, it was the first time their body received lipid nanoparticles. People historically have this confidence in the concept of, oh, it's just a vaccine. Lipid nanoparticles go everywhere in the body, to the brain, to the bone marrow, to the liver, to the spleen, most importantly to the reproductive organs. I regret it every single day that I walked into my local pharmacy to get that shot in my arm. I feel like my body is eating itself.

The speaker urges their colleagues in the medical field to do the right thing and speak out against the problems they have observed with the COVID-19 vaccines. They share examples of adverse reactions they have witnessed, including strokes, cancer in fully vaccinated individuals, heart problems, blood clots, and fertility issues. The speaker emphasizes the need for more doctors to join the movement and speak up, despite the potential consequences. They highlight the importance of using facts and clinical experience to support their claims. The speaker concludes by encouraging others to continue fighting for the truth and not retire, as they are backed by evidence and personal experiences.

The speaker took his five-month-old daughter to the doctor for a wellness visit and vaccinations, but he is not comfortable with her getting six vaccines at once, including one with three vaccines in it. He knows people whose babies were healthy before vaccinations but now have permanent disabilities. He wanted to delay or space out the vaccines, but the doctors refused and are no longer willing to see his baby, which has happened with a previous doctor as well. He questions the necessity of vaccines like polio and hepatitis for his daughter. He believes doctors are incentivized by insurance companies to administer vaccines and are prioritizing vaccinations over his daughter's well-being. He asks Donald Trump to investigate vaccination policies and change the requirement that doctors have regarding vaccinations.

The speaker expresses their belief that the federal government is controlled by corporate interests and urges people to stop taking COVID vaccines, claiming they are toxic, lethal, and ineffective. They argue that vaccines cause damage to the brain, heart, liver, and bone marrow. They blame organizations like the CDC, FDA, and medical societies for spreading misinformation that leads to death and injury, particularly among pregnant women and unborn babies. The speaker warns about the unknown long-term effects of vaccines and advises against taking any more doses or boosters. They refer to the vaccines as dangerous experimental treatments.

I'm speaking out because my fully vaccinated son, Jackson, had health issues. With SB277, my perfectly healthy, vaccine-free five-year-old can't attend school in California. I cried for weeks, feeling I was meant to fight a company bigger than some countries. I used to sell Vioxx at Merck, which was later found to have manipulated data and covered up heart attack risks. This made me realize things on the market aren't always safe. If a vaccine is added to the schedule, drug companies can make billions. I cannot stay silent. Pharma influences medical education and research, leading to biased studies. The FDA and CDC are compromised, with conflicted leaders and revolving doors. Pharma creates customers for life, especially with vaccines for kids. They prioritize profit over people, and it's up to us to take back our health.

A woman shares her devastating experience with the Covid-19 vaccine, stating that it has completely destroyed her life. She suffers from constant physical and cognitive issues, including speech and memory problems, tremors, and over 80 symptoms daily. Despite her case being reported, it was dismissed as psychiatric problems. She expresses suicidal thoughts and the need for multiple medications to cope. She urges caution regarding the government and doctors' actions, as she believed in the vaccine's safety until experiencing its severe side effects. She also mentions her father's negative reaction to her decision not to get vaccinated and vows to seek justice for his death.

Hello, I’m Dr. Mike Geadon. I want to address those affected by vaccine injuries and those involved in politics. I believe the materials labeled as vaccines were intentionally designed to harm recipients. With a background in pharmaceutical research, I assert that the COVID-19 response was based on misinformation, leading to unnecessary deaths due to harmful medical practices. The so-called vaccines were rushed and inherently toxic, targeting the body’s immune system and potentially harming fertility. This was not a mistake; it was a deliberate act by powerful entities seeking control. We must stop trusting those who lied to us and speak out against these actions. Politicians must recognize the gravity of their decisions regarding public health legislation. If we remain silent, we risk losing our freedoms and lives. Speak out, no matter the consequences. Thank you.

The speaker claims the medical landscape is dominated by COVID vaccine injuries, disabilities, and deaths, and that they submit multiple entries daily to VAERS, facing scrutiny and potential penalties for falsification. They state they diagnosed an executive in her late thirties with Guillain Barre syndrome from COVID-19 vaccination. The speaker estimates that only 1% of manuscripts on COVID vaccine injuries are being published, suggesting a tremendous bias, and that there are about 4,000 papers on the vaccine debacle, which is about 1% of reality. They claim to have never seen myocarditis, heart failure, or blood clots from eating frosted flakes, but are seeing people devastated by the shots. The speaker advocates for removing COVID-19 vaccines from the market, a critical reevaluation of the vaccine schedule, dropping all vaccine mandates, and rescinding the 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act.

I lost everything for not taking the vaccine. The lockdown made me question the situation, feeling it was all suspicious. I couldn't work due to vaccine mandates. My dying mom couldn't go to the hospital because they wanted to vaccinate her. I became her caregiver until she passed away. I urge people to push back against the World Health Organization treaty for global health.

World governments have harmed millions without apology. The speaker believes vaccines cause autism, but mainstream media won't discuss it. They gathered data from 10,000 parents showing a link between vaccines and autism, ADHD, and other health issues. More shots lead to poorer health in children.

The speaker shares their experience of suffering from myocarditis after receiving the vaccine. They express frustration with health professionals who dismissed their symptoms as anxiety or in their head. It took them a year and a significant amount of money to finally get a diagnosis. The speaker urges people to trust their own bodies and question the advice of health professionals. They believe the vaccine is causing more harm than good and want to spread awareness about the need for change. The speaker concludes by stating that health professionals are killing people and calls for them to start doing the right thing.

The speaker, a doctor with expertise in immunology and virology, criticizes the use of modified RNA vaccines, claiming they are nonsensical and dangerous. They argue that these vaccines can cause severe side effects and transform parts of the body. The speaker calls for an immediate ban on the modified RNA vaccine platform and warns against a pandemic treaty with the WHO, which they believe would strip away freedom of choice. They encourage those who have received the vaccine and experienced side effects to seek help from responsible doctors. The speaker urges people to stand up against the authorities and demand accountability for their handling of the COVID-19 situation. They emphasize the importance of fighting for a better future for the sake of our children and grandchildren.

The speaker questions the safety of the COVID vaccine, citing a list of possible side effects. They argue that it is not a vaccine but an experimental mRNA injection that can cause illness and death. The speaker claims that the vaccine does not prevent COVID transmission or severe illness and that its ingredients are unknown. They suggest that effective therapies are being ignored and censored, and that COVID cases and death counts are exaggerated due to unreliable testing. The speaker questions the motives behind lockdowns, censorship, and the vaccine agenda. They emphasize that once the injection is taken, it cannot be undone, urging listeners to make their own choices.

In this video, the speaker discusses the adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines and criticizes the lack of transparency and accountability in the vaccination process. They highlight the rise in serious health emergencies, the neglect of natural immunity, and the higher rate of adverse events compared to other vaccines. The speaker calls for the release of data on vaccine dosage, dates, and deaths, and expresses concern over the public's diminishing trust in health services, media, and politics. They also mention their personal sacrifices for speaking out against the vaccines and emphasize the need to challenge the powerful interests involved.

The speaker claims the COVID vaccine is not a vaccine, but an experimental gene modification therapy that doesn't work, citing instances of vaccinated individuals contracting COVID. They state that masks are ineffective against the airborne virus and that social distancing guidelines were based on fabricated information from a 19th-century scientist. The speaker believes the regulations were not based on science but were lies, and that the government suppressed non-mRNA vaccines. They recount an incident of being forced to wear a mask by a police officer in an airport. The speaker concludes that the issue is not about regulation or etiquette, but about lies and "neo-fascism," which they believe is what younger people dislike.

Chris and I chose not to vaccinate, concerned about myocarditis. Our family faced tension over vaccination choices, especially after Rory's tragic incident. He got vaccinated and soon after reported discomfort. One night, he collapsed, and despite my efforts to reach him, he was gone. The health commissioner stated that the risks of the vaccine weren't clearly communicated, but it wasn't a breach of rights. Rory's death was linked to acute myocarditis from the vaccine. Many believe the vaccine is safe, and experts emphasize its effectiveness. However, there are concerns about the pressure to vaccinate, which some feel compromised their choices. Ultimately, the message remains that the vaccine is considered very safe.

A physician who experienced an adverse reaction to the Moderna COVID shot states that the COVID shots should never have been authorized for children and pregnant women. After receiving the Moderna shot, the speaker developed transverse myelitis, autonomic dysfunction, and an unspecified immune disorder, leading to medical retirement. The speaker is now co-chair of React19, representing Americans injured by the COVID shots. The speaker claims that the clinical trials were rushed, safety data was withheld or altered, and reporting systems like VAERS and V-Safe have failed. The speaker questions whether regulatory agencies have a conflict of interest. The speaker alleges that instead of proving safety and efficacy, the COVID-19 shots were assumed to be safe and effective, with short follow-up data, and were given to pregnant/lactating women and children without long-term safety data. The speaker is appreciative that the COVID-19 shots have been removed from the childhood vaccination schedule for healthy children, but much damage has already been done. The speaker advocates for recognition, research, medical care, and compensation for those injured by the COVID-19 shots.

The speakers claim the push for a COVID vaccine was motivated by money, and they believe there's a connection between the vaccine and subsequent deaths and blood clots. They express frustration that people aren't acknowledging this connection. One speaker shares a story about a veteran who was allegedly told that the hospital treating him was not allowed to connect his adverse side effects to the vaccine, even when listed as side effects. They say corporations don't want to talk about it because they mandated the vaccine. They believe people who got vaccinated don't want to admit they made a bad decision, leading them to deny any link between the vaccine and increased mortality rates, strokes, cancer, and heart attacks. One speaker recalls being gaslit by a former prime minister who denied coercing anyone into getting vaccinated, despite restrictions placed on the unvaccinated. Another speaker says they were misrepresented on CNN during their own recovery from COVID.

The speaker took his five-month-old daughter to the doctor for a wellness visit and vaccinations, but he is not comfortable with giving his daughter six vaccines at once, especially since one of them contains three vaccines. He knows people whose babies were healthy and then had adverse reactions to vaccines, resulting in disabilities. He wanted to delay or space out the vaccinations, but the doctors refused. This is the second doctor who won't see his baby due to his refusal to get the second round of vaccinations. He questions the necessity of polio and hepatitis vaccines for his daughter. He believes it's insane that doctors would stop seeing his child over vaccinations and thinks this policy needs to change. He asks Donald Trump to investigate vaccinations, claiming doctors are incentivized by insurance companies to administer them and are more concerned with vaccinations than his daughter's well-being.

I was coerced into getting the COVID vaccine despite being healthy and against it. After receiving the vaccine, I ended up in the ICU paralyzed with a rare neurological disorder. Lack of family visits led to a pressure wound. Despite the benefits of vaccines, they can cause harm. We should have the right to refuse medical interventions without facing discrimination. I urge the committee to vote yes on 83/19.

The speaker finds it difficult to find someone who hasn't been damaged by the vaccine, and even senior consultant colleagues haven't connected their ailments to the vaccine. The speaker claims the vaccine causes autoimmune diseases, of which there are 131 types, all reportedly linked to the vaccine. Individually, these appear as coincidences, but collectively, a high percentage of vaccinated people suffer from one or more autoimmune conditions. The speaker is annoyed by their GP practice constantly pushing boosters, even knowing their views, suggesting they are incentivized by payment. The speaker believes that if the practice adhered to "first do no harm," they would refuse to administer the vaccines.

The speaker argues that there was no informed consent regarding the COVID vaccine, as the government and pharmaceutical companies knew it wasn't a traditional vaccine. They hid potential adverse reactions and lack of evidence on transmission prevention. Despite good intentions, people were misled into taking it.

During COVID-19, the speaker believes the government was authoritarian and imposed a vaccine passport. Because the speaker is unvaccinated, they were unable to travel across the country. When asked if they regret not being vaccinated, the speaker said no, stating it was the best decision of their life.

The speaker, recently retired from a local hospital, claims widespread disbelief in flu shots among colleagues due to data issues, stating "the efficacy and I won't give you data. You created the data. Ten percent one year, eighteen percent the next, forty percent at best." They describe the flu vaccine given to children aged two to eight for nearly four years as ineffective, with a claimed three percent efficacy at times. The speaker contrasts this with their hospital experience, where doctors, nurses, medical assistants, patient care, and lab staff did not believe in the flu shot, until mandates and recommendations arrived. They express relief at retirement, saying their soul was sick about what they witnessed, and that conflicts of interest prevented them from speaking out while employed. They recount working on high-volume ER days with about 300 flu cases daily and claim they never contracted the flu, attributing this to personal practices: washing hands, taking vitamin D, and using a berry syrup. The speaker criticizes the shift from physicians and nurses to pharmacists administering the vaccine, accuses the system of bribing people with Target gift cards and marketing the vaccine as free, and denounces scare tactics. They observe an increase in vaccination across generations, noting "some of you are my age," with their generation having seven shots, their daughter ten, her son around sixty, and their new grandson expected to receive seventy-two vaccines, expressing shock at this escalation. The speaker references Robert F. Kennedy Jr., saying he fights for them and goes to court for kids who suffered, noting that Kennedy's family started Special Olympics. They claim that in Kennedy’s view, autism linked to vaccines is evident since there were no autistic kids in the past four decades, and allege that vaccines have caused autism. They describe watching a perfectly healthy two-year-old become a "severe autistic child" after vaccination, expressing certainty that autism exists because of vaccines. They forecast their 10-year-old grandson becoming an adult who, at age 40, would be walking in the mall with a diaper and a helmet. The speaker ends by thanking studies they claim are not done and reiterates their stance against vaccines, including autism implications, as presented in the narrative.

The speaker believes COVID vaccine programs should be stopped. They are astounded by the number of papers critical of the vaccine or showing negative effects. The speaker claims a group of researchers funded by Pfizer and the NIH bullies editors to retract papers with negative findings about the vaccine. They assert the number of retractions is appalling. According to the speaker, in one instance where an editor resisted, Nature Springer bought the journal and retracted the paper. The speaker states that this is what they have been dealing with.