reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A Dutch court has ruled that Bill Gates will face trial for allegedly misleading the public about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. The case was brought by seven plaintiffs claiming vaccine-related injuries. Gates' legal team argued against the court's jurisdiction, but the judge confirmed it, allowing the lawsuit to proceed. Notably, other defendants include the Dutch Prime Minister, NATO Secretary General, members of the Dutch government, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, and the Dutch state. This ruling is seen as a significant step forward, as those named must now defend themselves against these accusations.

Ezra Levante here at Pearson Airport. As you can see, I'm about to hop on a plane and fly overnight to Dublin, Ireland. The most atrocious thing has happened. The worst thing in the world, the worst thing imaginable has happened in Dublin. A 10 year old girl went missing from state care, and then she shows up and she's been raped allegedly by a migrant staying at a government migrant hotel in Dublin, Ireland. The government bought a massive hotel called City West, the largest hotel in Ireland. They paid a €150,000,000 for it. That's like a quarter billion dollars in Canada. It's a massive place. But they shut it down as a hotel and turned it into an urban refugee camp. 2,000 people, mainly single military aged migrant men, most of whom threw their ID into the water before they came aboard. They're they're fake refugees. But more than that, they're violent. The crime rate of these men staying at this urban refugee camp are enormous and it's not like a prison. The men are allowed out every day. Now, first of all, they're given a roof over their head and three meals a day, more than a lot of Irish homeless get, but they mill around by day. They go hang out in parks and they they get drunk. They harass people on the street, they sit in the schoolyards or primary schools. It was only a matter of time before something horrific like this happened. Understand this migrant hotel is right in the heart of Dublin. It's not in a faraway place. It's not on some island and it is not enclosed by a prison wall. These men go into the community every day, 2,000 of them. Imagine a 2,000 man city planted in the heart of Dublin. The rage in Ireland is palpable online. We're flying overnight. We wanna go and talk to the locals about this. How did this happen? Will it happen again? Will police and politicians ever take this seriously? Is this the tipping point or will Ireland continue to be a mass immigration country? All the main political parties and all the regime media are fully in support of mass immigration. Ireland has a faster mass immigration program than anywhere else in the world. Maybe Canada has it worse, but in Ireland it's more shocking because it's happened so suddenly. I wanna cover what's going on and I wanna give people the other side of the story, not the state broadcaster RTE, not the politicians who cover it up. I wanna talk to grassroots Irish people who have been warning about this. I'm flying overnight with our cameraman, Lincoln Jay. We'll land in the morning. We'll go straight to the City West Hotel. There is also gonna be a protest at 07:30PM Irish time. That's 02:30PM East Coast North American time. We will be there. If you can help us cover the economy class airfare to get over there, I'd be grateful. Go to migrantreports.com. That's also where we're gonna put all our footage. My job for the next twenty four hours is to cover what the Irish people have to say and what they have to say not only about this horrific rape, but about the politicians and media and the greedy migrant hotel industrialists, what their role is in this too. A shocking, shocking story, and we'll have more for you as soon as we land. For Rebel News, I'm Ezra Lemmat. You can follow the story at migrantreports.com. What do we want? Raise your hands. Where do we want them? Damn.

Geneva is a beautiful city with a dark side. Organizations like WHO, Gavi, and the World Economic Forum (WEF) are based there, but the speaker believes they should not have diplomatic immunity. They accuse these entities, along with Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and Big Tech, of promoting a global injection of harmful substances into billions of people. The speaker, who claims to be a victim, calls for the arrest of these individuals. Another speaker mentions a "UN syndrome" where people are afraid and those who understand the situation either stay silent or try to raise awareness.

German prosecutors are reportedly preparing charges against Bill Gates for his role in the COVID vaccine rollout, following a study exposing high levels of DNA contamination in Pfizer's mRNA vaccines. The study, led by Jurgen O'Koerchner and Professor Brigitte Koenig, found that the contamination exceeded regulatory safety thresholds. The German government has allegedly admitted that the pandemic was a manipulated operation to push experimental vaccines. Gates is accused of pressuring governments to adopt digital ID systems, biometric tracking, and vaccine enforcement. Singapore has already passed legislation mandating vaccination, and Gates allegedly pressured Indonesia to use children for mRNA tuberculosis vaccine trials. Gates has reportedly lost his immunity status in Kenya, where lawsuits are piling up over vaccine trials. The Gates Foundation was allegedly expelled from India after an investigation into deaths and injuries from vaccine trials. Citizens in Holland are also taking legal action against Gates over mRNA vaccines. The video promotes pillsforever.com, advertising medicines like ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, and fenbendazole.

This impromptu session of the International Crimes Investigative Committee features Pascal Najadi, who has filed a criminal complaint against several individuals, including the president of Switzerland. Najadi explains that he has filed charges in Switzerland and the United States, alleging violations of laws and rights related to the Pfizer vaccine. He emphasizes the importance of informed consent and criticizes the World Health Organization. The case could have implications for others who have suffered similar damages. The conversation also touches on allegations of a population reduction program and the lack of testing for vaccine efficacy and safety.

Speaker 0 discusses “Bill Gates on trial,” asserting disbelief at the reality of the situation unless present in the courtroom, and notes that two connected legal cases are taking place in the Netherlands involving Bill Gates, Pfizer CEO Albert Baller, former Dutch prime minister Mark Rutte, who is described as the current secretary general of NATO, and other senior government officials. Speaker 1 claims they can prove “without any doubt” that the official narrative of COVID-19 is fake, and notes the rapid developments in the case. They also reference the Epstein files, stating that there is a “very evil elite” led by bankers, described as harmful to the world and its people. Speaker 0 relays remarks from lawyer Peter Stassen in court, who purportedly said on the Global Elite Network that there exists a globally organized malicious elite at the top of which are some families who own central banks worldwide. He asserts Epstein “plays an important role in this network” and that Epstein is “the bankers’ agent.” According to these remarks, Epstein is shaping a transhuman agenda driven largely by the desire to eradicate much of the world’s population. Speaker 0 further describes a “satanic system,” in which bankers, secret services, media, Hollywood figures, government officials, universities, and many scientists are corruptly connected to this network and serve a transhuman, described as satanic, mind-bending system. On COVID and genocide, the statement is that “we are witnessing the largest genocide of the world’s population ever.” Speaker 1 adds emphasis with the word “This,” underscoring the claim that the narrative and events described are connected to the broader allegations. Speaker 0 concludes that the trial is “beyond the courtroom,” defining it as a test for the judiciary and posing the question of whether justice will reveal what it can still become.

John O'Looney, a guest on the channel, discusses the mass illegal immigration happening in the UK and Ireland. He claims that these migrants are actually UN soldiers who will be deployed by the WHO during the next pandemic lockdown. He also mentions that these soldiers have been trained by British soldiers and are being brought into the country under the guise of being refugees. O'Looney believes that the government is intentionally allowing this to happen. He predicts that civil unrest will occur and that people need to come together and recognize their common enemy. He encourages networking and preparation for the future.

Today in The Netherlands, outside the Court of Appeal in Amsterdam, a landmark case brings senior government officials, major media figures, pharmaceutical leadership, and global policy actors together as defendants in a single COVID response case. Among those ordered to appear are Albert Baller, the CEO of Pfizer, the former Dutch prime minister, senior Dutch health ministers, leading figures from the Dutch media, and Bill Gates. This makes the case extraordinary. On March 9, an important step is happening at the Amsterdam Court of Appeal. This hearing is not the main trial. The main trial is proceeding, and Bill Gates, if not appearing in person, must have representation and offer a defense. Today’s hearing concerns a procedural question: should the court allow an appeal against an earlier decision that blocked a request for preliminary evidence? In simple terms, the claimants ask the court for permission to present and examine expert evidence early before the trial, to have experts testify, documents examined, and key scientific and legal claims tested through cross examination. The lower court refused that request. The Amsterdam Court Of Appeal is being asked to decide whether that refusal should itself be reviewed. This hinges on the right to have evidence examined in public. If the appeal is allowed, expert testimony and scrutiny of the evidence could proceed; if refused, the claimants must continue without that preliminary examination. The reason for this hearing traces to the main lawsuit, begun in July 2023. Seven Dutch citizens filed a civil case in a district court, claiming they were misled about the nature of the COVID threat and about the safety and necessity of COVID vaccines. They argue that government officials, public health authorities, pharmaceutical executives, and major media figures promoted a narrative that induced fear and compliance based on unscientific claims of a novel pathogen called COVID nineteen. They claim these representations caused them to take vaccines and to suffer psychological and physical harm. The claimants describe a tort claim: the defendants breached a duty of care owed to the public by providing false or misleading information that resulted in damage. They seek two things: a declaration that the defendants acted unlawfully and compensation for the harm. Before the trial proceeds, the claimants asked for the evidence behind those claims to be examined in court, hence the provisional evidence request and today’s appeal. Central to the request are expert witnesses from multiple disciplines addressing scientific, legal, psychological, and institutional dimensions. The experts include Catherine Watt (legal researcher in public health law), Sasha Latipova (pharmaceutical regulatory processes), Doctor Joseph Sansone (psychologist studying crisis messaging and behavioral compliance), Catherine Austin Fitz (financial analyst on institutional power structures and global policy networks), and Doctor Mike Yeadon (English pharmacologist, former Pfizer VP). Yeadon has argued that the safety narrative surrounding the vaccines is challenged, claiming inadequate testing and concerns about toxicity. The point of a court is that such claims should be tested under cross examination, not dismissed without scrutiny. Allowing this appeal would enable the evidence to be heard and tested in public, with broader implications beyond the Netherlands, potentially influencing accountability, transparency, and public trust in other jurisdictions. What happens here may influence debates about open scrutiny of evidence in courts elsewhere. The speaker closes with a personal note, recalling six years spent fighting misinformation and supporting the truth be told campaign for COVID jabbed, injured, and bereaved, and underscoring that this case concerns justice in action, public scrutiny, and accountability for powerful institutions.

Jim Ferguson reports from Ireland on a court case in Luswarden regarding the Covid pandemic and mRNA "gene therapies." Accusations were made against figures like Bill Gates, Albert Buhler (Pfizer CEO), Mark Rutte, and Klaus Schwab, alleging genocide, biological weapons use, and media collusion. Lawyers for all but Bill Gates attended. A judgment is expected in six weeks. The lead lawyer, Arno van Kessel, was arrested and detained in a maximum-security prison without charge, allegedly to stop the case. Ferguson thanks the Dutch people and millions of online supporters. He is in Ireland for meetings related to "unity," hinting at future developments. Ferguson emphasizes the importance of uniting against the "globalist agenda," including central bank digital currencies and digital IDs. He promotes Freedom Train International and thanks supporters for fueling the movement. He asserts the Covid pandemic was a "war on humanity" and those responsible must be held accountable. He praises the free independent media for getting the truth out.

Ezra Levant reports from Pearson Airport that he is flying overnight to Dublin, Ireland, following a horrific incident he describes as a 10-year-old girl missing from state care who “shows up” having been raped allegedly by a migrant staying at a government migrant hotel in Dublin. He states the government bought City West, Ireland’s largest hotel, for €150,000,000 and converted it into an urban refugee camp housing 2,000 people—primarily single military-aged migrant men—many of whom discarded their IDs before arriving. He claims these men are not proper refugees and describes them as violent, noting a high crime rate among residents and that they are allowed out into the community daily. Levante asserts the migrant hotel is in the heart of Dublin, not isolated, and that the residents roam the city daily, with 2,000 men “planted in the heart of Dublin.” He says they receive a roof and three meals a day—more than many Irish homeless people—yet they spend their days in parks, drinking, harassing people on the street, and sitting in primary schoolyards. He frames the incident as part of a broader trend, saying Ireland has a rapid mass immigration program and that all major political parties and the regime media support mass immigration. He contrasts Ireland’s approach with other countries, asserting Ireland’s program is unusually fast and recent. Levante states his aim is to cover what the Irish public thinks about the rape incident, as well as what people think about politicians, media, and “greedy migrant hotel industrialists,” and to provide the other side of the story beyond state media. He plans to speak with grassroots Irish people who have warned about the situation, and to report on the incident, the politicians, and media coverage. He and his cameraman, Lincoln Jay, are heading to City West Hotel, with a protest scheduled for 07:30 PM Irish time (02:30 PM East Coast time). He asks for help covering economy-class airfare to travel to Dublin, directing supporters to migrantreports.com, where all footage will be posted. Levante closes by promising further updates once they land, stating: “My job for the next twenty four hours is to cover what the Irish people have to say and what they have to say not only about this horrific rape, but about the politicians and media and the greedy migrant hotel industrialists, what their role is in this too.” He ends with a call-and-response refrain: “What do we want? Raise your hands. Where do we want them? Damn.”

Jim Ferguson interviews Michael Young (Honeybadger 6), a former US Special Forces veteran, about global issues. Young is now in Bangkok, monitoring events like fires at facilities in Ireland. Starmer is criticized for calling protestors against illegal immigration in Northern Ireland racist. The "migrants" are predominantly military-age men, not asylum seekers. Young says this is an invasion, not a border crisis, and accurate language is crucial. He believes people have been "lulled to sleep" while this happens, and Ireland is being set up for genocide. The choices are to fight, flee, or become a slave. Some migrants arrive with UN handlers and receive immediate benefits without proper vetting, potentially including terrorists and criminals. Ireland's population has grown rapidly, with the increase mainly young men. Young references "Camp of the Saints" and "Weaponized Migration," arguing migration is being used as a weapon. He describes encountering fit, military-like individuals among migrants. Criminals are entering, leading to increased crime. The globalist agenda aims for a totalitarian government, not a recent development but a long-term plan involving central bankers. Groups like the Rothschilds, the Chinese Communist Party, and the World Economic Forum are involved, with figures like Gates and Soros having different goals but cooperating to destroy nation-states. The goal is to replace populations with divided groups that are easier to control. The US is a prime target. Soros aims to destroy the US by funding lawlessness. Globalists seek a one-world government and weaken nations by flooding them with migrants. Trudeau, Biden, and Harris are "clowns" and "condoms for the globalists," disposable and irrelevant. The jab pushers are also disposable. The globalists are pushing a depopulation agenda, aiming for a manageable population of 500 million. The conflict in Ukraine may be an attempt to provoke Russia into using nuclear weapons. Some Irish and Americans are considering moving to Russia. Globalists are trying to bankrupt farmers to control food supplies and engineer famine. Famine, war, and pandemics create human osmotic pressure, leading to migration. Globalists have been setting up conditions for famine, with rising food prices and reduced variety. Cutting off electricity could cause immediate famine. The globalists use the Hegelian dialectic, creating problems and then offering solutions. The migrants could be activated simultaneously in different countries to bring about a new world order. The invaders are the gunpowder, and the jabs are WMDs. The elite will discard the invaders after they have served their purpose. The game is rigged, and governments are captured. People owe them nothing. It's time to man up, build teams and communities, and reject cowards.

Dutch lawyer Arno Van Kessel, who was set to lead a major lawsuit against Bill Gates, Pfizer CEO Albert Borla, and former WEF chair Klaus Schwab over COVID policies and vaccine injuries, was arrested in a military style style raid and jailed without charges. He was arrested and imprisoned in The Netherlands. One month before trial against Bill Gates, and ours is set to begin. The Netherlands goes spooled fascists in a Gestapo reminiscent late night arrest of attorney Arno Van Kessel. That's from the McCullough Foundation. Arnold Van Kessel was arrested 06/11/2025 in a raid by Dutch special forces, blindfolded and detained in Vought Prison on suspicious suspicions of anti institutional activities and potential violence, not actual vie

A court hearing took place following the arrest of Arno van Kessel, a key figure in a case accusing Alfred Bourla from Pfizer, news channel editors, and Dutch politicians. The hearing addressed a request to hear expert witnesses, including Catherine Olsen Fitts, in a separate case brought by three victims. The defense argued against the need for witnesses, citing readily available online information, but the victims' lawyer insisted on in-person testimony before the court. The discussion included Bill Gates' lack of defense, with his lawyer deferring to the court. Concerns were raised about van Kessel's arrest, allegedly by a police unit with ties to NATO, which is also accused of involvement in a misinformation campaign related to the pandemic. Van Kessel has been suspended as a lawyer, and is being held in a prison with interrogation rooms and a psychiatric ward, raising concerns about intimidation and due process. Supporters believe the case is of international importance and could spark further legal actions globally.

A court hearing took place following the arrest of Arno van Kessel, a key figure in a case accusing Alfred Bourla from Pfizer, news channel editors, and Dutch politicians. The hearing addressed a request to hear expert witnesses, including Catherine Olsen Fitts, in a separate case brought by three victims. The defense argued against hearing these witnesses, citing readily available online information. The lawyer for the victims argued that court testimony is necessary. The discussion included Bill Gates' lack of defense, with his lawyer deferring to the court. Concerns were raised about van Kessel's arrest by a special police unit with alleged NATO links, his suspension as a lawyer, and his detainment in a prison described as a dangerous facility where prisoners can be interrogated without public access. The case involves charges of genocide and the use of biological weapons, potentially leading to a Nuremberg-style trial. Supporters believe this case is an international precedent and could spark justice globally, while his arrest is seen as intimidation.

You can find information about RFK Jr. being targeted by MI6 by searching online. Recent court revelations showed the FBI and CIA's involvement in lawsuits against me, highlighting a broader conflict against corporate influences in government. Despite the challenges, there is a significant awakening happening that has these entities worried, as evidenced by leaked internal documents. RFK Jr. recently discussed the criminal indictment of Bill Gates in the Netherlands, emphasizing that while they may try to evade accountability, the situation is changing, and they cannot hide from the truth.

A court hearing took place following the arrest of Arno van Kessel, a key figure in the case, who is now held in a high-security prison with no contact allowed. The case involves accusations against Alfred Bourla of Pfizer, news channel editors, a newspaper, and Dutch politicians. It consists of the original case from last year and a separate one initiated by three clients. The hearing addressed a request to hear expert witnesses, including Catherine Olsen Fitts and Mike Heiden, with arguments focusing on the validity and necessity of their testimony. The defense argued against it, citing readily available online information, while the victims' lawyer, mister Stassen, emphasized the importance of court testimony. Bill Gates' legal representative stated he would comply with the court's decision, offering no defense. Concerns were raised about van Kessel's arrest by a special police unit with alleged NATO links, coinciding with accusations against NATO in the other court case regarding misinformation. Van Kessel has been suspended as a lawyer, raising concerns about preventing him from reaching judges. The prison holding him is described as a potentially dangerous environment where prisoners can be interrogated and tried without public access. The case is seen as internationally significant, potentially setting a precedent and sparking further actions worldwide.

The discussion centers on a Dutch civil litigation in which Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, and Marc Rutemp (Marc Rutza) are named as individual defendants in cases linked to “Project COVID” and broad pandemic preparedness efforts years before the 2020 pandemic. Key facts asserted: - The defendants are plaintiffs in civil tort litigation filed in the Netherlands around 2023. Two cases exist: an older 2023 case and a second case involving additional plaintiffs. The Dutch approach allows individuals to be named as defendants in civil tort actions. - Gates and Bourla (and Rutza) have appeared as defendants; Gates attempted to avoid jurisdiction, but the Amsterdam court ruled that Gates and Bourla, as individuals, respond to the case. They have not appeared in court personally, but their lawyers appear on their behalf. - On March 9, an appeal hearing occurred in Amsterdam at the Court of Appeals, with extensive public attendance (about 60 journalists, podcasters, and plaintiffs). The hearing was described as explosive; a single attorney, Peter Stassen, presented a long argument as co-counsel had been imprisoned and disbarred, leaving one attorney on a tight budget. A video of the proceedings and a standout speech went viral. - The plaintiffs allege the defendants conspired to create “Project COVID” and a “pandemic preparedness racket” years prior to 2020. The core claim is that Gates, Bourla, Rutza, along with others, collaborated with private NGOs, the military, NATO, and DOD through a DARPA-linked pandemic program to identify pandemic potential viruses and to develop vaccines and therapeutics within sixty days, with funding from the DOD. - Evidence cited includes a 2017 AstraZeneca tape in which a key AstraZeneca executive states that DARPA approached them in 2017 to join a consortium to identify pandemic viruses and deliver vaccines within sixty days; the response was, “I thought it was science fiction.” The tape is part of an evidence package showing pre-2020 planning. - February 4, 2020 is highlighted as a crucial date: a telephone call from DARPA indicating COVID was declared a national security threat, followed by retroactive emergency declarations around March 2020. A February 4, 2020 conference was scheduled, with widespread communications among government, military, HHS, and CDC; the aim was to secure liability protection for pharmaceutical countermeasures during a declared emergency. - The defense includes the assertion that the public-private partnership extended to many companies (including 300 others) that joined the consortium, with U.S. and European regulatory synchronization through mutual recognition agreements. - The alleged motives are primarily framed as profits and control, with references to a long-standing history of military involvement in vaccine development and public health measures, including the PREP Act in the U.S. and parallel European countermeasures frameworks that waive liability and regulatory requirements during declared emergencies. The PREP Act’s role — especially in the U.S. — is discussed as shielding manufacturers from liability, with European frameworks described as allowing similar protections through contracts and synchronized countermeasures legislation. - Expert testimonies: five experts have provided evidence supporting foreknowledge and intentional deception by government health officials and the named defendants. Sasha Ladopova and Catherine Watt contributed written testimonies; Ladopova references foreknowledge by health regulators, and the broader regulatory harmonization across EMA and FDA. - Francis Boyle, a professor known for work on bioweapons law, testified that the vaccines/metas could be viewed as bioweapons; he died three weeks after agreeing to testify. - Injuries to plaintiffs: in the initial case, seven injured plaintiffs with one death; the second case added three more plaintiffs. Injuries cited include cardiovascular inflammation, autoimmune conditions, and cancer; plaintiffs contend their lives were destroyed by the countermeasures, while regulators and manufacturers allegedly denied injuries and deaths. What happens next: - An October 22 hearing in the lower court in Lewarden (The Netherlands) is planned, with a public in-person event and a press conference. - The appeal on the second case seeks to have expert witnesses heard under oath; the prior lower court denied this, and the higher court’s decision is anticipated (with expectations of denial, according to the interview). - The campaign invites public interest and financial support; the foundation in the Netherlands funds the case, and the English-language YouTube channel is available for updates and evidence. Contact points for following the case include Sasha Ladopova’s Substack and the Dutch foundation’s YouTube channel and materials.

The speaker accuses Bill Gates, the Welcome Trust, and the Rockefeller Foundation of controlling the World Health Organization. They claim Gates funds 88% of the WHO's donations, aiming to reduce the Earth's population through vaccinations. The speaker warns of attacks on the beef industry and promotes vigilantbeef.com for high-quality, long-term storage beef. Use promo code blackout for a 15% discount.

The speakers discuss the World Health Organization (WHO) and its connection to powerful corporations like BlackRock and Vanguard. They criticize the WHO for spreading misinformation during the pandemic and accuse it of being funded by private interests, including the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. They also mention the WHO's alleged cover-ups and unethical practices. The speakers believe that countries are starting to question their membership in the WHO and the United Nations, and they predict a shift towards closer cooperation between countries and a move away from these organizations. They highlight the dangerous power of the WHO to declare a pandemic and impose lockdowns on countries. The speakers express hope that Ireland, with its referendum mechanism, can become a battleground against the WHO and raise awareness about its problems. They urge President Michael D. Higgins to protect the freedom and sovereignty of the Irish people.

Governments are seen as complicit by working with people like Bill Gates, a major World Health Organization funder. Questions arise about why governments seek advice from someone perceived as a high school dropout and borderline psychopath. Gates is accused of unethical work in Africa, creating a vaccination syndrome by adding chemicals to tetanus vaccines to cause infertility. Similar issues arose in South America with the Zika virus, allegedly caused by an inappropriate function in a tetanus vaccine, leading to microcephaly in infants, with Gates at the head of the vaccination program. Listeners are warned against trusting any vaccine program associated with Bill Gates, who is described as a eugenics-minded person driving the world to take something murderous. The claim is that Gates is suggesting products that murder those who receive them and those around them.

A lawyer suing Bill Gates and Pfizer's CEO for COVID vaccine injuries was arrested in the Netherlands. According to the McCullough Foundation, the arrest of attorney Arno van Kessel occurred one month before the trial against Bill Gates was set to begin. Van Kessel was set to lead a lawsuit against Bill Gates, Albert Borla, and Klaus Schwab over COVID policies and vaccine injuries. He was arrested in a military-style raid and jailed without charges. Grock reported that Van Kessel was arrested on suspicions of anti-institutional activities and potential violence and detained in Vought Prison. His imprisonment was extended ninety days without formal charges. The speaker claims this violates habeas corpus and Magna Carta principles. The speaker suggests the arrest, a month before the lawsuit trial, indicates possible suppression, though officials cite security risks. The July 9 trial proceeded with a co-lawyer, Peter Stassen. The charge was suspicious suspicions of anti-institutional activities and potential violence.

Fauci, Soros, Gates, Zuckerberg, and others must be held accountable for their involvement in what is claimed to be the largest mass poisoning in human history.

We need to hold accountable individuals like Fauci, George Soros, Bill Gates, and Mark Zuckerberg for their roles in what is being called the greatest mass poisoning in history due to the COVID-19 vaccines. These vaccines are deemed unsafe and defective, with claims that they have harmed billions globally. The shots are described as toxic, and there is a call to stop their distribution worldwide. There are concerns about the potential introduction of harmful substances into our food supply. Immediate action is urged to arrest those responsible for promoting these vaccines.

The speaker discusses claims about modified RNA (MOD RNA) vaccines and DNA contamination in plasmids. They state that after creating MOD RNA on plasmids, the plasmid DNA remained and much of it could not be destroyed. They reference Kevin MacKurn’s discovery three years ago that vials were full of plasmid DNA, the whole plasmid and parts of it, and note that authorities allegedly minimized the issue, arguing that it doesn’t matter and that vaccines have saved millions of lives. The speaker asserts that the DNA in the vaccine vials was packaged in lipid nanoparticles and that this DNA would enter human cells. They reference colleagues’ publication last year (the INMODEO publication) showing that the DNA in the vaccine vials entered cells in culture and remained stable in cells for days, just as the MOD RNA did. Despite this, they say authorities dismissed the concerns with reassurance that nothing would happen. A pivotal point is attributed to a recent discovery by Kevin MacKinnon, claimed to be three weeks old, about what happens during transcription in the chromosome. The speaker explains that during production, byproducts occur and some mRNA strands do not detach from the DNA where they are formed, resulting in hybrids of DNA and RNA that come off together. The hybrids are described as dangerous, akin to “sparks of a sparkler,” and the speaker emphasizes that RNase H is an enzyme in the cell that takes care of these sparks and extinguishes them immediately. The speaker states that normal physicians don’t know about this, and they had to read up on RNase H after Jessica urged them to. The claimed consequence of failing to extinguish these hybrids is damage to the chromosome, with the metaphor that fires could light up and damage where they occur. The speaker asserts this could lead to “any illness that you see in the textbooks of medicine,” including tumors, neoplastic disease, autoimmune disease, developmental impairment, and death. They warn that the book of life—the genes and chromosomes—could be set on fire if these hybrids are not neutralized. The speaker says they have given interviews weekly, including one with Gary Null, and allege that this information is spreading worldwide. They claim that this situation is akin to attempted murder and exhort physicians globally not to participate, promising that those who do will be charged. They claim this issue is not limited to COVID vaccines but applies to all MOD RNA vaccines, including a flu MOD RNA vaccine now in use, and possibly veterinary vaccines, which they claim will be heavily contaminated with deadly dangerous hybrids. They urge authorities and controlling bodies to act, warning that they will face court if they fail to address the issue.

Dr. Joseph Sanson, a Florida psychotherapist and licensed mental health counselor who litigates pro se, contends that the COVID-19 mRNA injections are biological and technological weapons of mass destruction and argues Florida should stop facilitating these injections and related products. He frames his effort as part of a broader effort to stop what he calls a bioweapon program tied to the pandemic. Background and filings - Sanson began in May 2021, working about 18 months to pass a band of jab resolution at the county level declaring mRNA COVID injections to be biological and technological weapons of mass destruction and urging action by the governor and attorney general. He claims that he got these resolutions passed in about 10 Florida counties, in Idaho, and in Arizona, and that they influenced the Florida Surgeon General to call for a halt to injections in early 2024. - He notes that the Florida Department of Health has said these mRNA injections are unsafe for humans and a potential threat to the human genome. - On 04/01/2023, while advancing these resolutions, Sanson says he suffered congestive heart failure and later underwent a triple bypass on 04/10/2023. He says he tried to rely on unvaccinated blood for surgery and consulted Dr. Francis Boyle, who helped endorse his band-and-jab resolution. Boyle is described as the author of the U.S. domestic implementation legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention; Boyle died about two months after Sanson filed his December 2024 case, which Sanson says prejudiced his case. - Sanson’s first mandamus filing claimed the governor and attorney general were violating Florida statute 797.166 (as he asserts). The court found the writ of mandamus improper (ministerial duty limit) and he lost the appeal. Second case and remedies sought - On 12/01/2024 Sanson filed a second case seeking an injunction and declaratory relief, arguing that his April 2023 medical events and exposures were the result of involuntary environmental exposure through shedding of the technology in the injections. - He characterizes his hospital stay, the decision to obtain unvaccinated blood, and Boyle’s involvement as part of this exposure theory. He says the case includes an 80-page complaint with 50–64 pages of affidavits, including nine affidavits up front and two more recently. - One key affidavit is from Francis Boyle, whose affidavit is described as not only expert legal opinion but legislative intent, given Boyle’s role in crafting the U.S. domestic implementation legislation for the biological weapons conventions. - The World Council for Health in Florida endorsed Sanson’s bill, and a 2025 paper titled COVID-19 Harms and Damages (COVID-19 harms and damages, non-exhaustive conclusion) is cited as stating that both the virus and the vaccine violated the Biological Weapons Convention; the paper has 11 coauthors, including doctors Villa, Zivjic, McCullough, and Maverkakis. Evidence and theory of harm - Sanson cites studies and affidavits suggesting shedding of the mRNA technology, transmission to unvaccinated individuals (including women), and possible environmental exposure from intimate contact or proximity. He references an Israeli study showing transmission of mRNA components to unvaccinated women and notes reports of menstrual-cycle interference and other immune effects. - He argues that involuntary environmental exposure through shedding constitutes a dangerous threat warranting injunctive relief under Florida Health Freedom Act and Civil Rights Act, as well as constitutional protections. He contends the Florida Surgeon General’s statements and the 2025 paper support these positions. - He also argues that the vaccines are illegal gain-of-function products, with derivatives of the spike protein present in injections, demonstrating specific intent; he cites Boyle’s arguments on gain-of-function, dual-use technology, and knowingness. He invokes malice of forethought (reckless disregard for human life) and informed consent issues, arguing there was zero informed consent for a bioweapon. Legal strategy and procedural posture - Sanson says his strongest immediate legal avenue is the Health Freedom Act, along with Civil Rights Act and constitutional provisions, rather than relying on the Weapons of Mass Destruction statute alone, which he dropped in an amended complaint. He argues the illness and exposure could violate civil and constitutional rights and that discovery is needed to develop evidence. - He claims the defense has not adequately addressed the merits, focusing on procedural arguments. He asserts there are procedural errors and seeks a new judge and evidentiary development, including testimony from multiple experts (Villa, Zeviets, Mihalchia) and the Surgeon General Ladapo under oath. - He has sought to reassign the case to a different judge due to perceived bias and past rulings; he notes the prior judge’s decision in a related whistleblower case against the Surgeon General. The Netherlands case and cross-border dimension - Sanson is involved as a witness in the Netherlands case against Bill Gates and Albert Borla of Pfizer, coordinated by Sasha Ladopova. The Netherlands appellate court limited live testimony, but Sanson has provided written statements and affidavits. A trial hearing in The Netherlands was set for October 22 in the cited case. Next steps - Sanson is pursuing an oral-argument motion for live, livestreamed proceedings; a decision is pending, potentially in September. He hopes for evidentiary development and more cases to challenge the PREP Act and related immunities. - He emphasizes public engagement and urges others to seek cases in other states or countries to push discovery and accountability. Overall, Sanson presents a narrative linking the mRNA vaccines to environmental shedding and alleged bioweapon characteristics, backed by affidavits, peer papers, and testimonies, and seeks injunctive relief in Florida and collaborative proceedings in Europe to halt the use and distribution of the injections.