TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims that someone, presumably a former FBI director, called for the assassination of the president. The speaker states that the individual knew exactly what he was implying, and that this implication was clear. The speaker believes the individual apologized, but doesn't want to apologize for advocating violence. The speaker calls this person a "dirty cop" and says his history is not clean. The speaker does not want to take a position on what should happen as a result of the alleged assassination call, but will leave the decision to others. The speaker suggests that leniency might be understandable if the individual had a clean history, but because he doesn't, the speaker is less inclined to be lenient.

We saw a man crawling on a roof with a rifle while Trump was speaking. We alerted the police and Secret Service, but they seemed unaware. Eventually, the man was shot by the Secret Service. The speaker is certain the shots came from the man on the roof.

The administration is taking threats against President Trump seriously, with the Secret Service director leading the investigation. A recent Rutgers study found that over 55% of respondents felt that murdering President Trump would be "somewhat justified." The study also indicated an "assassination culture" is emerging on the extreme left. The speaker asserts that people must be held accountable for publicly calling to assassinate the President of the United States, regardless of political affiliation.

The speaker, a retired Green Beret and sniper, believes the shooting of President Trump was a planned attack due to security measures in place. He questions how a 20-year-old could access the president and take shots without help from insiders. He offers to protect the president for free.

The speaker questions the director about security lapses at an event where the president was present. They criticize the director for not securing a dangerous rooftop, highlighting their own shooting skills to emphasize the potential danger. The speaker expresses frustration with the director's leadership and calls for their immediate dismissal.

Good morning. I've been asked about the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump, and I want to share my perspective. With 17 years in the military, including 14 in a special operations unit, I have experience in close protection for VIPs, including the Prime Minister in dangerous areas. The recent incident raises serious concerns. The shooter’s ability to access a rooftop so close to the president during daylight seems implausible without assistance from an agency or organization. The aerial photo made it clear that security measures were insufficient. It appears that this was not just a random act; it had to be planned, whether through negligence or strategic intent.

The speaker, a retired Green Beret and sniper, believes the shooting of President Trump was a planned attack due to security measures in place. He questions how a 20-year-old could access the president with a rifle without inside help. Urging focus on those who allowed the incident, he offers to protect the president for free.

Merrick Garland vetoed charging Ryan Ruth with attempted assassination. Ruth wrote a book calling for Donald Trump's assassination and camped out in a bush on Trump's golf course for over 12 hours with body armor and a loaded SKS rifle. The Secret Service noticed the rifle barrel, shots were fired, and Ruth was apprehended. Garland's decision suggests he believes Ruth had another reason for being there with body armor and a loaded rifle. The speaker questions what other reason Ruth, who had written about assassinating Trump, could have for being in that location as Trump approached.

Donald Trump has survived two assassination attempts, including one this weekend outside a golf course. The speaker believes it's too late to address the rhetoric surrounding Trump, arguing that claims of him being a threat to democracy and that the country will end if he's re-elected may have contributed to the attempts on his life. The speaker wants Democrats to acknowledge that if Trump wins, democracy, the Constitution, and the country will not end, and that there will be no dictatorship or bloodbath. They believe hyperbolic statements about Trump should stop, as they have not been true in the past.

Speaker 0: Someone is on the roof during a rally. Shots are fired, but it is unclear if President Trump was hit. Secret Service is seen reacting. Speaker 1: Illegal immigration was at its lowest when I left office. The current president caused a surge in illegal immigration. Translator: Shots were fired at a rally, and it is uncertain if President Trump was hit. Illegal immigration was lowest when I left office, but surged under the current president.

After a guest called someone a demagogue and dangerous, the speaker's family received death threats. One threat involved someone wanting to show up in New Hampshire, which the police intervened in. The next day, the speaker's security guard called at 3 AM, reporting someone was at their house threatening 4 dead bodies. The speaker doesn't attribute the threats directly to the guest's comments. The speaker doesn't want to engage in rhetoric that endangers others. They also believe the guest was wrongfully pushed out of the White House for comments around 9/11. The speaker wants to set a good example for discourse in the country, acknowledging their competitive nature in the presidential campaign sometimes hinders this. They hope to build a friendship.

The speaker, a retired Green Beret and sniper, believes the shooting of President Trump was a planned attack due to security measures in place. He questions how a 20-year-old could have accessed the area and fired shots without inside help. The speaker offers to protect the president for free if needed.

Speaker confronts the audience with a blunt accusation: 'Every one of you, you are. You're complicit in the attempted assassination of Donald Trump twice.' They demand silence: 'You dare Just be quiet.' The speaker asserts the audience 'are responsible for this because you are a you are echoing the horrifically horrible political violent rhetoric that's being produced by the Democrat party.' They reiterate to all present: 'Every single one of you here.' The passage closes with a pointed question: 'How can you say that you don't even know'. The speaker frames the remarks as a direct rebuke to the audience and implicates the rhetoric as coming from the Democrat party.

President Trump is mentioned repeatedly. The speaker requests "just a minute" from President Trump multiple times. "A %" is stated, followed by "That's a random. No."

According to the speaker, an individual from Homeland Security informed his office before the second assassination attempt that there were 5 known assassination teams in the United States: 3 inspired by foreign governments and 2 domestic. This individual was concerned that President Trump's force protection was insufficient. The speaker clarified that all 5 teams were targeting Trump. This raised questions about why security teams were being pulled from Trump's detail to be assigned to Joe Biden, John Bolton, and others, despite the threat level to Trump being substantially higher. The speaker also claimed that requests from the Trump detail and campaign for more security were being ignored.

Speaker 0 joked that no one is bothering to try to kill Kamala because it's pointless, as she is just a "puppet." Speaker 1 agreed, stating she is irrelevant and replaceable. Speaker 0 clarified that some people misinterpreted the joke as a call for assassination. The speakers contrasted this with the two attempts to kill Trump with actual guns and bullets. Speaker 0 noted that Trump doesn't seem rattled by the attempts, attributing it to his strong constitution, despite his unhealthy diet and lack of exercise. Speaker 2 confirmed that Trump didn't seem like a man who'd been the subject of assassination attempts. Speaker 0 agreed that Trump seemed of sound mind and body with a strong backbone.

The shooter was identified as a potential suspect, but by the time they were located, they were on the rooftop and able to fire at the former president. The Secret Service director was allegedly instructed by the administration and the DHS secretary to keep quiet or risk losing her job. One speaker has heard from the Secret Service director, but not publicly. Another speaker states they would fire the Secret Service director for not being visible and transparent with the American people, regardless of the story. They believe the handling of the situation by briefing only Milwaukee was poorly executed.

The speaker questions why a potential threat was allowed on stage without informing the security team, especially when snipers were present. They demand answers from those responsible for the safety of the president and past presidents.

The discussion centers on the president's comments yesterday, referring to "Trump supporter as garbage." Speaker 0 asks two questions: "does he think less of Americans who support Trump than he does of those who do not?" and "why is he using that kind of rhetoric? How is that presidential?" Speaker 1 says: "So so a couple of things. Couple of things. So just to clarify, he was not calling Trump supporters garbage, which is why he put out this is why he wanted to make sure that we put out a statement that clarified what he meant and what he was trying to say."

The speaker claims that the microphone could have been a weapon used against Donald Trump. They suggest the microphone could have contained a pathogen, anthrax, or fentanyl. The speaker states that President Trump could have been killed via the microphone.

The speaker criticized the Secret Service for claiming a sloped roof was unsafe when it wasn't. They demonstrated shooting accuracy on a similar roof to highlight the danger. The speaker blamed the Secret Service for failing to secure the rooftop during a past event, putting the President at risk. They called for the director's immediate dismissal due to incompetence.

The speaker warns about strong language and accuses Democrats of endangering Donald Trump's life, suggesting they are behind attempts on his life. The speaker claims that since Trump's entry into politics, Democrats have been trying to destroy him, starting with character assassination after initially liking him. When that failed, they impeached him twice, and the January 6th events didn't stop him. Indictments and financial pressures also failed. The speaker believes the attempt on Trump's life on July 13th is suspicious, questioning how someone could breach Secret Service security. The speaker cites another attempt on Trump's life in Florida and accuses Democrats of being a danger to democracy, despite their claims to the contrary. The speaker asserts that this is a battle between good and evil, and Democrats are evil. The speaker urges protecting Trump and investigating the July 13th incident.

The speaker claims Trump's "assassin" was escorted by multiple individuals. The speaker identifies two uniformed officers, then points out the second officer appearing again. The speaker then identifies officers number three and four, followed by a police car. The speaker questions whether those escorting the alleged "assassin" are Secret Service, FBI, media, or a combination of these.

The speaker, a retired Green Beret and sniper, believes the shooting of President Trump was a planned attack due to security measures in place. He questions how a 20-year-old could access the president with a rifle without inside help. Urging focus on those who allowed the incident, he offers to protect the president for free if needed.

The speaker discusses the lack of security measures during a potential assassination attempt on President Trump. They criticize the decision not to have a patrol car or personnel on the ground for deterrence. They question the explanation of a sloped roof hindering security efforts. The speaker calls for a thorough investigation to uncover the truth and ensure accountability. They express concern over the potential conspiracy theories that could arise from the incident. The speaker emphasizes the need for proper protection of politicians and highlights the importance of accountability in maintaining security standards.