reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Cities cannot ignore federal law due to lack of funding for enforcement. A nearby city faced economic decline after implementing similar policies. The federal government must enforce laws, but the current administration has failed to provide necessary funding. Biden would not allow cities to ignore federal law.

I can tell you is this. I see too much violent crime being committed by young punks who think that they can get together in gangs and crews and beat the hell out of you or anyone else. I can't touch you if you're 14, 15, 16, 17 years old and you have a gun. I convict someone of shooting another person with an illegal gun on a public bus in the chest, intent to kill, I convict him. And you know what the judge gives him? Probation. We need to go after the DC council and their absurd laws. We need to get rid of this concept of, you know, no cash bail. We need to recognize that the people who matter are the law abiding citizens, and it starts today. But it's not gonna end today because the president is gonna do everything we need to do to make sure that these emboldened criminals understand, we see you, we're watching you, and we're gonna change the law to catch you.

The speaker claims the rise of certain issues in localities nationwide originates with the unelected US Department of Education. This department allegedly uses its $83 billion budget to pressure schools into adopting "toxic ideologies" by threatening to withhold federal funding. The speaker states they are the first US presidential candidate to propose abolishing the Department of Education. They argue that 25% of the department's budget could fund three armed security guards in every school across the nation, which they present as a superior use of funds.

"The democrats have fucked around and lost 2,100,000 registered voters since 2020." "Zero. About carjackings. Three." "the city with said murder rate, well, that just happens to be Democrat ran." "the city with the highest murder rate in Texas is Houston." "Well, who runs Houston? A democrat." "now they wanna bring what Trump doing in DC to Chicago, and the democrats are losing their fucking mind." "the biggest question is why are democrats so obsessed with keeping crime around?" "Because, you know, they say Trump is trying to attack the black and brown communities." "Them communities are the ones that get the biggest benefit out of this." "I think the damn whole crap party and everybody in it is the biggest, goofiest, Max Smith's motherfuckers I've ever seen in my life." "I'm off to the gym, man. Love peas and chicken grease. I'm a get out of here."

In Chicago, crime is rampant with people being attacked and shoved into subway trains. Law and order must be restored by giving police their tools and respect. Drug dealers are causing a crime wave, leading to a call for the death penalty for them and human traffickers. Implementing this will reduce crime by 75%. Hiring 1000 more police officers is crucial to putting violent criminals behind bars.

I am introducing articles of impeachment on Mr. Graves for weaponizing the Department of Justice and refusing to prosecute real criminals in Washington DC. The abuse of power has made DC residents victims. I yield back my time.

The speaker argues that "The Black Lives Matter organization show up in Washington DC to protest the National Guard being in Washington DC who is currently helping police in Washington DC get crime under control and this crime being black people unalive and other black people. Majority of it that is." They claim "they believe that it is targeting black communities, threatening civil liberties even though the goal is to lower crime." The speaker repeats "Stupid is as stupid does. But are they really stupid? No. They're not stupid." They note "They're getting low on funds, and they need you to, you know, give a little bit." They warn that "If it happens again in Washington DC, then they'll blame Trump for it instead of blaming the black lives they claim to matter who actually burnt up the city." They add that "Since the National Guard has been deployed, there have been no homicides, people can safely walk down the street with ice around their neck and nice watches. Walking"

Speaker 0 argues that the premise is disgusting and cites CBS admitting that sixty percent of those arrested had criminal charges or convictions, while noting the majority were non-violent. They question what “non-violent” includes, listing drug trafficking, child porn, fraud, DUI, and human smuggling, and mock the idea of those as harmless offenses. They accuse CBS of trying to influence public perception and claim, “What are you trying to do here? It’s like you want more people to die.” They proceed to highlight CBS’s claim that forty percent of ICE arrestees had no criminal past, arguing the distinction should be about status in The US. They counter with examples: an MS-13 member who shot, tortured, and murdered five people but “forget it, in El Salvador,” suggesting he’s nonviolent because he wasn’t convicted in the US. They compare this to other cases where alleged criminals killed in the US had no prior US criminal history, and to scammers running fake day cares who haven’t been prosecuted yet. The speaker contends that crimes committed outside The US do not count, and posits that we should owe Nicolas Maduro an apology. They note that this is coming from “the same media that lectures one death is too many, which is used to justify insane regulations in public health policies,” referencing the pandemic and the claim that “a single death is a tragedy,” contrasted with a later statement about a jogger being killed during lunch. They frame the report as an effort to stop deporting bad people by portraying the target as peaceful illegals and by saying they lied when they claimed to do “the worst first.” They argue that resisting the goal of deporting the worst first forced ICE to use a wider net that included all illegals. They claim that if Waltz or Fry had cooperated, the issue would never have arisen, and state that their goal was to prevent deporting criminals so ICE would be forced to sift through all illegals, which would be a political win for those who would say, “They’re not going after the worst after all.” The speaker concludes it’s moronic, not to protect people but to protect political power, and that this allows the narrative to say a murderous felon came here looking for a better life, when in fact, it was a better knife.

Krista McGap from the Washington Lawyers Committee argues that defunding the Criminal Code Reform Commission sends the message that Black lives don't matter in DC. She states that the city's criminal legal system disproportionately affects Black communities, with over 92% of those incarcerated for DC offenses being Black, despite Black residents making up 43% of the population. McGap notes that DC's criminal laws date back to Jim Crow and were exacerbated by the war on drugs, leading to long sentences and suppression of the Black community. McGap believes the Criminal Code Reform Commission's guidance is essential for advancing a new criminal code and reforming titles 23, 24, and 50. She emphasizes the importance of the commission's data analysis work for an impartial and equitable legal system. Defunding the commission would mean making decisions based on race-rooted rhetoric instead of facts.

The speaker questions why the Manhattan DA, Alvin Bragg, is not taking action against a person who defended themselves. They express frustration that the person is only facing a short prison sentence. Another speaker responds, stating that Alvin Bragg is a justice warrior who prioritizes criminals over victims. They mention other DAs in San Francisco, LA, and Philadelphia who have similar approaches. The focus is on protecting criminals rather than victims.

The speaker asserts that fraudsters complain the loudest and with fake righteous indignation, calling it a tell. They cite a striking example: $2,000,000,000 awarded from the federal government to Stacey Abrams’ NGO, which the speaker says basically didn’t exist. They question, “Why?” and note that there are many such cases like that.

The speaker argues that the loudest complainers and the most fake righteous indignation come from fraudsters. They claim there are NGOs, including a Stacey Abrams NGO, that “basically didn't exist” yet were suddenly awarded $2,000,000,000 from the federal government. Stacey Abrams reportedly asks, “why?” The speaker notes there are many such cases.

The speaker questions why the Manhattan DA, Alvin Bragg, is not taking action against a person who defended themselves. They express frustration at the possibility of the person only receiving a short prison sentence. Another speaker responds, stating that Alvin Bragg is known for being a justice warrior who prioritizes criminals over victims. They mention other DAs like Boudin in San Francisco, Gascon in LA, and Kramer in Philadelphia, who allegedly follow a similar approach. The speaker suggests that these DAs prioritize protecting criminals rather than victims.

"They don't want Donald Trump to come in there with the National Guard because if they clean up the crime, Chicago will lose 800,000,800 million dollars in federal funding for crime programs." "It's a 100% true." "And black people are falling for it." "These liberal protesters are falling for it." "They don't even live in Chicago." "And so they're dependent on Donald Trump." "It's one big racket, bro, and it's not fair to the black people and the community members and the people that live, work, and play and have to deal with this nonsense on a regular basis." "It's so messed up, bro." "Money. I say this about everybody. Body. Follow the money. The money is gonna lead you to the reasons why."

The speaker describes "a massive scandal in Washington DC with the doctoring of crime stats," noting that "the Department of Justice under the attorney general is leading the effort to uncover this." "But when we ultimately share the results, results, it will it will stun you." They state that "the extent to which even though DC had the worst crime in America, honestly measured, it dramatically understated how bad it was," and claim "There's even accusations that murders and homicides were reported as accidents instead of murders." "I mean, this is how severe the manipulation of the crime data has been in this city." "And it will all be uncovered, it will all be brought to light." The speaker adds: "I've had a chance to spend some time, as to everyone here, with the police officers in the city." "Members of the public are going up to them and thanking them, just overflowing with gratitude."

The speaker says the fraudsters complain the loudest and with fake righteous indignation, and that is a tell. They describe these people as crazy. They point to examples like the $2,000,000,000 to Stacey Abrams’ NGO that basically didn’t exist and suddenly gets $2,000,000,000 awarded from the federal government. She asks, why? and notes that there are many such cases like that.

Speaker urges a safe city and capital, thanking the president and attorney general, and says criminals must understand they won’t get away with it. He cites violent crime by gangs, claims laws are weak, and that “I can't touch you if you're 14, 15, 16, 17 years old and you have a gun.” He recalls convicting someone who shot another person with an illegal gun on a public bus; “Intent to kill? I convict him. And you know what the judge gives him? Probation.” He calls to end “no cash bail” and to challenge the DC counsel, insisting the focus is on law-abiding citizens. He vows the president will “do everything we need to do to make sure that these emboldened criminals understand, we see you, we’re watching you, and we’re gonna change the law to catch you.” He notes “the jurisdiction is through the state attorney general, Brian Schwab” and references a poster about a beaten youth and family court “yoga and arts and crafts.” Enough. It changes today.

The transcript claims that people protesting against ICE do not realize their rights were “completely violated” the previous day by the California State Legislature. It states that, in the Assembly, Democrats advanced a potential per-mile tax by a simple majority vote, asking the California Transportation Commission for recommendations by 2027 to implement a per-mile tax charging “two to nine cents for every single mile” driven. The speaker says this would cost families about $1,200 to $4,200 extra each year, depending on how estimates turn out, and describes it as punishing people for needing to fulfill work and family obligations. The transcript also claims the US House decided that cars made past 2026 should continue to have kill switches, describing this as a decision made by the Biden administration. It argues that if California sends monthly or quarterly per-mile-tax bills and someone refuses to pay, the government could “kill switch” the car, meaning that refusing payment would prevent driving. Finally, the speaker says the public is “supposed to trust them with our money,” citing a report about a homelessness program run by Newsom. The transcript claims that $11 to $12 million was spent, but the program helped only 22 people, and characterizes that outcome as “absolutely ludicrous.”

And the president spoke about this before. We've uncovered and the process of uncovering a massive scandal in Washington DC with the doctoring of crime stats, and the Department of Justice under the attorney general is leading the effort to uncover this. But when we ultimately share the results, it will it will stun you. The extent to which even though DC had the worst crime in America, honestly measured, it dramatically understated how bad it was. There's even accusations that murders and homicides were reported as accidents instead of murders. I mean, this is how severe the manipulation of the crime data has been in this city. And it will all be uncovered, and it will all be brought to life. You know, I've had a chance to spend some time, as is everyone here, with the police officers in the city. Members of the public are going up to them and vainting them, just overflowing with gratitude.

The speaker argues that in the District of Columbia there is almost no evidence supporting the efficacy of violence interrupters. They claim that one city council member has been indicted for accepting bribes from a violence interruption organization, and they state they can name at least a half a dozen suspects who have been arrested for murder, gun charges, drug charges, and other violence charges who have been paid by violence interruption organizations. The speaker characterizes violence interruption in DC as a grift and contends that tax dollars are funneled into the hands of criminals through these programs. They express a stance that money should not be spent on violence interruption in the District of Columbia, asserting that there is absolutely zero proof that it works or that it has any level of efficacy whatsoever.

The speaker challenges Maine Community Foundation’s distribution of funds intended for victims of a mass shooting in Lewiston, arguing that many survivors still have unpaid hospital bills and that some money went directly to Africa to fund weapons of war. They claim that the portion remaining in the Lewiston community did not benefit those present the night of the shooting, and that they do not know how most of the money was used. They state they first wrote to Council President Chitum in March about how Gateway Community Services used money not intended for them, an issue they say was reported by Main Wire at that time. The speaker notes that Council President Chitum has publicly aligned with a local consultant who played a large role in distributing the funds, describing this as an allegiance to someone other than constituents. They also reference Lewiston Auburn Youth Network as another nonprofit receiving mass shooting funds, and claim that until recently it claimed to be located at 210 Blake Street, inside a condemned building. According to the speaker, Chitam responded to concerns with an assurance that the organization “does very good work,” but the speaker cannot find video or photographic evidence of that work. They say Chidam declined to respond to a recent email requesting specifics about the organization’s work or details of what Chitam did when investigating it, noting that visiting the location listed on paper apparently did not occur. Gunfire data is presented: 36 confirmed instances in 2023, 36 confirmed in 2024, and 37 so far this year, with the speaker noting that these figures do not include unconfirmed sounds reported by residents. They list several agencies that apparently received portions of the mass shooting donations by writing to the committee about how their clientele had fled war and violence and were traumatized: Lewiston Auburn Youth Network, Generational newer Lewiston Auburn Youth Network mirrors, Gateway Community Services, AK Collaborative Empowered Immigrant Women Unite New Mainers Public Health Initiative, and the Somali Bantu Community Association. The speaker contends that some of these same agencies stood with the police at community forums to curb gun violence over the years, and asserts that gunfire in the streets has literally increased since they received the money. Citing the growing issue of nonprofit fraud in Maine, the speaker urges the Lewiston City Council to take action to rectify the re-victimization they say has occurred when donations were distributed to unrelated agencies that used the tragedy as a funding opportunity for personal benefit.

The speaker criticizes Democrat governance of major cities, arguing that Democrat-run cities have allowed savage, bloodthirsty criminals to prey on innocent people. They claim radical left judges, politicians, and activists in these cities have adopted a policy of catch and release for thugs and killers. The speaker cites a specific incident in Charlotte, North Carolina, where a 23-year-old woman who came from Ukraine was murdered on a public train, presenting a photo of the victim and stating she was a beautiful young girl with a magnificent future in this country who is now dead. The killer is described as a deranged monster who was roaming free after 14 prior arrests. The speaker asserts that a depraved criminal element of violent repeat offenders is spreading destruction and death throughout the country and insists that the response must be forceful and strong, stating that “they” understand only one language: to be vicious like them. They claim that 24 of the top 25 most dangerous cities in America are run by Democrat mayors, with Chicago highlighted as an example where 50 people were murdered in recent weeks and hundreds were shot. The speaker contends that it is time to stop this madness and that the people of the country need protection, safety, law, and order. A claim is made that it has been proven that safety can be restored, citing Washington, DC, as an example. The speaker describes DC as previously a bloodthirsty, horrible, dangerous place and one of the worst, but now it is a crime-free city, and they assert that this can be done and can happen fast. The speaker states the goal to keep it that way. The audience is urged to seek help from the president, with the message that Chicago needs help and other cities need help. The speaker pledges to take whatever actions are necessary to achieve safety, declaring that they will make America safe again, including the big cities. The address concludes with a call for support and for decisive action to restore safety and order.

I am introducing articles of impeachment on Mr. Graves for weaponizing the Department of Justice and refusing to prosecute real criminals in Washington DC. The residents of DC are victims of his abuse of power.