TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

It were me, a 100% of my red money would go into jay proof. A 100% of it. You've got a dev sitting here with his face on the screen every day telling you he's never gonna sell a penny and who never has. Who admits to mistakes when they were made like the market maker, Gambling on some shitcoin. Big mistake. Market maker. Gone. Dealt with.

That this is not a rug pull, that I have 100% control over this supply, that I'm not gonna lock it, that I'm not gonna stake it, that I'm gonna keep my control. And that's why here we are with people panicking, by the way, at a legitimate floor of 50 to $60,000,000 on a meme coin that was launched with a 100% fair stealth launch that nobody knew about until three days later. Do you know what kind of an achievement that is?

Lies about Jay Proof, including claims of 271,000 and 6,000,000 falsehoods, are being spread by a foreign-born Italian who is cosplaying as white and has teamed up with Jews. This individual has announced meetings with billionaire Jews with the expressed intent of attacking the speaker, the network, and Jay Proof. All of these lies can be easily discredited because Jay Proof is a cryptocurrency meme coin, and everything is on the blockchain.

Okay, so you're asking if I was part of the Melania launch, and if it was sniped like Trump's? Yes, I was part of it. The team wanted to snipe it because of the Trump situation, but we weren't the big snipers. We didn't make any money from it, and we didn't take any liquidity out – zero. Regarding the wallet traced to the Portnoy situation that received $1,500,000 of Melania token, and then sold, there's a distinction. We didn't swap liquidity, but we did sell liquidations. Those are two different things. So yes, we sold, but we didn't swap.

"And from a dev who promised never to sell, which I haven't." "There's a cost to putting a website together." "Who do you think pays for boosts on the Dex screener? That's me." "Those cost anywhere between 1,200 and $5,000." "I did it at least a dozen times." "You know, these things have actual real cost to them." "Along with influencers and from a dev who promised never to sell, which I have."

100% of my money would go into Jay Proof. The dev is present daily and claims he has never sold and never will. He admits to mistakes, such as the market maker gambling on a shitcoin, which was dealt with. Everything I do is to bolster this token.

That this is not a rug pull, that I have 100% control over this supply, that I'm not gonna lock it, that I'm not gonna stake it, that I'm gonna keep my control. And that's why here we are with people panicking, by the way, at a legitimate floor of 50 to $60,000,000 on a meme coin that was launched with a 100% fair stealth launch that nobody knew about until three days later. Do you know what kind of an achievement that is?

It were me, a 100% of my red money would go into jay proof. A 100% of it. You've got a dev sitting here with his face on the screen every day telling you he's never gonna sell a penny and who never has. Who admits to mistakes when they were made like the market maker, Gambling on some shitcoin. Big mistake. Market maker. Gone. Dealt with.

And from a dev who promised never to sell, which I haven't. There's a cost to putting a website together. Who do you think pays for boosts on the Dex screener? That's me. Those cost anywhere between 1,200 and $5,000. I did it at least a dozen times. You know, these things have actual real cost to them. Along with influencers and from a dev who promised never to sell, which I have.

We discussed the tension between being open and transparent while also protecting ourselves. We agreed to be open and transparent for everything that happened 90 days ago and before, as it's all gone. It's similar to how cryptocurrencies work, where there is no trail if you don't want it.

A person can buy from various identities. We limit the size of the sale to make it easier to disguise. For example, if you're a whale and want a lower price, you can buy 50,000 units to avoid scarcity.

Discussion centers on a claim that "these are the wallets that bought J Approved before Stu announced it on Telegram on April 0 04/12/2025 at 04:48 UTC." The speaker adds "Andrew buys, and the market may have maker buys twenty minutes after that." Stu says he announced after launch; others discuss timing. "Any purchases that were made on April 11 would have been people that saw this thing on the deck screener or other people that I had called and told." "I launched it and then people started buying." "No. Negative. Nope. Not at all." "They didn't buy the day before." "I launched it and then people that were I have no idea who they are. Immediately, people started buying." AK: "the wallets that we're referring to are those that interact with other wallets with the team." "If they interacted with the team wallet, not the burn, but with the team wallet, then yeah. Then that's a problem." "I don't do shitcoins."

It's not just one thing that indicates if the volume is good at a certain point; it's intuition. It's a combination of socials, volume, holders, how many people have left, who's selling, and who's showing it. Wait, is this for real? Let me double-check... President of Europe... but this is old, from last week. Oh, no way! He just launched his stuff? How is this even possible? No, no, no, no, no!

But of all of the red money or crypto or meme coin investments, it's my personal opinion that J proof is the most solid. And all of that, again, the evidence of that is available on the blockchain where you can see what the dead wallet holds, what the dead wallet started with, how I have continued to pour LP rewards back onto the chart, not taking any money for myself. It's not a get rich quick scheme. Never has been. It's a long term play. You should be less concerned about the dollar value of your J proof wallet as you are concerned with the amount of J proof tokens that you are holding.

It's not insider trading unless trading on personal information. Market manipulation is the concern, like promoting a stock. The distinction is unclear. Discuss the tweet's impact on markets and investing. Join the program to explain your actions.

But of all of the red money or crypto or meme coin investments, it's my personal opinion that J proof is the most solid. And all of that, again, the evidence of that is available on the blockchain where you can see what the dev wallet holds, what the dev wallet started with, how I have continued to pour LP rewards back onto the chart, not taking any money for myself. It's It's not a get rich quick scheme. Never has been. It's a long term play. You should be less concerned about the dollar value of your J proof wallet as you are concerned with the amount of J proof tokens that you are holding.

It were me, a 100% of my red money would go into jay proof. A 100% of it. You've got a dev sitting here with his face on the screen every day telling you he's never gonna sell a penny and who never has. Who admits to mistakes when they were made like the market maker, Gambling on some shitcoin. Big mistake. Market maker. Gone. Dealt with.

This is my coin. This is my face, my reputation on the line, and this is my word. So if you believe in our message and if you believe in me and if you believe in our movement, then you have the opportunity to invest in that movement.

Speaker explains that "the space ... wasn't held correctly" and admits, "I screwed up because I should have agreed to get our teams up immediately," opting to "let him have his day in court" and remain neutral. He says, "They know all these coins are Ponzi schemes" and notes that "Stu always had an answer immediately." He calls it "the kill shot" and presents a "cash out wallet, AGBZ. 8GBZB" where "three people on the team [are] cashing out to this wallet." He claims "Here's Stu Peters from the main wallet that he would never sell a penny goes to the side wallet here, AGZB," and identifies "the donation wallet" as "JCJE" while saying "donation wallet" again. He reports "$77,249.76 withdrawn" and says "drain liquidity from J Proof." He asserts "three different team members are using that wallet" and calls it "irrefutable proof" and ends with "Spread the word."

Do my family and friends know I'm in this business? Yes, they do. You think I'm stealing? How? It's not stealing, it's legal. The tokens are real, people buy them. You say the tokens are worth nothing? No, they're worth something. You can still sell. People investing don't know their money will disappear? It's a gamble and they lost. It's a legal way of making money, a legal way of stealing. We wear masks because I'm recognizable. I'm connected with celebrities. It would put a stop to my lifestyle. Do I feel bad about people losing money, like their retirement? I'm just trying to get it. So, no, I don't care.

How do I know if the volume is good enough to route? Honestly, it's intuition. It's a combination of socials, volume, holders, how many people have left, who's selling, and who's showing it. Am I missing anything? This can't be real, let me double check... President of Europe? Wait, this is from an old week though. Oh shit, no way. You just launched this? Wait, wait, wait... Profit! Alright, well, it's right in the stream. We're out! Peace out.

The exchange centers on how the dev wallet supply was acquired. "The dev wallet. The dev wallet's initial acquisition of the supply." There were "combined purchases" that were "over 6,000" and ended up "close to 30,000. 25, 28, 30,000." The purchases required "multiple transfers into the dev wallet" because "my bank account only allows me to like send $5,000 at a time" and "Jewish restrictions are on that." The first three days show "only $6,000 in transactions." "He only put 14,000 initially from his from his Coinbase, and he claimed a 150,000 he's in." "I did it immediately. I did it immediately. I locked up the supply immediately." On evidence, "Have you got evidence that you put in $3,540,000 either via source scan or something else?" and "Where's the evidence that you..."

"that's not enough supply to lock it, so I had to go back and buy more." "There should be your Coinbase going into your dev wallet." "Where's that evidence?" "I'd like to see the evidence that you're in a $150,000, my friend." "I'm into this project for a collective 100 and some odd thousand dollars." "Between buying out of my own pocket, all of the boosts, all of the Dex ads, all of the website stuff." "But I made the dev buy immediately before and after it insta bonded." "So the first buy bonded it, and the second buy was right after it bonded." "I needed another buy to get the 85% that I needed, and that we wanted for the control structure to set all of this up."

When we snipe a coin we launched, it's usually to prevent other snipers from getting in. I don't personally conduct snipes, but the money used is the project's, aimed at deterring others and maintaining the project's viability. For example, Trump coin had enough volume that the snipes didn't matter, but when projects don't have enough volume to deter snipers the project can die quickly. So sniping becomes necessary to protect the project. This is a common conversation in Solana. I think this happens in all meme coins. The public isn't really aware of these behind-the-scenes activities, where projects manipulate their own prices to keep them stable. This is just me being super transparent, maybe it's oversharing.