reSee.it - Related Video Feed

We must acknowledge President Trump's repeated desire for Canada to become the 51st state. None of us want to be caught unprepared, failing to defend Canada or collaborate with our democratic allies to safeguard our borders. They are willing to cooperate with us. It is imperative that we take immediate action domestically, connect with them, and establish a new global order that protects democracy and Canadian sovereignty.

New details have emerged about the dinner between Trump and Trudeau. During the conversation, Trudeau expressed concerns that new tariffs would harm the Canadian economy. In response, Trump joked that if Canada couldn't thrive without taking $100 billion from the U.S. each year, perhaps Canada should become the 51st state, with Trudeau as its governor. Further discussion will follow with the panel.

The G7 is celebrating its 50th anniversary and relies on US leadership. Discussions will focus on trade and other issues with a talented group of people. The G7 used to be the G8, but Barack Obama and Trudeau didn't want Russia included, which was a mistake because the war wouldn't be happening if Russia were still involved, or if Trump were president. Regarding a deal with Canada, there are different concepts about tariffs. A tariff approach is simple, easy, and quick. A deal is achievable if both parties agree. Iran wants to talk, but should have done so sooner. Iran is not winning the war and should talk immediately before it's too late. Regarding US military involvement, there will be no comment. Putin shouldn't have a seat at the G7 at this point, but it was a mistake to exclude him. If he were a member, there would be no war.

The US and China have agreed in principle to hold a summit between President Biden and Chinese leader Xi Jinping in San Francisco next month. However, China has warned that the road to the meeting won't be smooth sailing. Some argue that the US shouldn't be engaging with China due to issues such as Fentanyl-related deaths, intellectual property theft, and Chinese influence in conflicts like the Israel-Hamas war. Concerns have also been raised about China's growing ties to Cuba and the influx of Chinese nationals into the US. Critics believe that China's involvement in the Middle East and its economic ties with Iran are problematic. There are calls for the US to impose severe costs on China and eliminate its influence. The California governor's recent visit to China has also sparked controversy, with some criticizing his actions and statements.

Israel wanted to attack Iran, but Trump told them not to. Iran said that if Israel bombs them, they will attack US military bases and embassies in the Middle East, so Trump ordered an evacuation. Iran has a military agreement with Russia, raising the possibility of World War III. Israel claims Iran is weeks away from developing a nuclear bomb, a claim that has been made for twenty years. Trump had a man arrested in LA who was handing out masks and riot gear to agitators and anarchists. Those arrested for assaulting ICE officers could face ten to twenty years in federal prison. The speaker suggests sending them to Guantanamo if there is no room in federal prison. According to the speaker, globalists want everyone dead, and Donald Trump is the only one standing in the way.

Democrats are imploding, with a New Jersey mayor arrested for assaulting federal agents and congress members using illegal immigrants for political gain. While Democrats focus on social justice, they neglect American citizens. Inflation is down to 2.3%, the lowest since April 2021, but Democrats shouldn't take credit. The UK and US have a trade deal, Ukraine has a minerals deal, and Donald Trump may go to Turkey for Russia-Ukraine peace talks. India and Pakistan have a ceasefire, and the Houthis agreed to a ceasefire. China is renegotiating trade terms and addressing fentanyl, but Biden is wrongly taking credit amidst record fentanyl seizures. Liberals are upset about Trump's deportation efforts, despite Obama deporting 5.3 million illegal immigrants. Due process is for American citizens. Trump is lowering prescription drug costs to match subsidized countries, challenging pharmaceutical companies.

Concerns are growing that those opposed to Trump, having exhausted other means to undermine him, may resort to instigating a world war to prevent his return to power and the potential exposure of their actions. The focus of Washington is on foreign policy and military power rather than domestic issues like border control or the drug crisis. A war with Iran, which is now allied with major global powers, could escalate into a world war involving Russia and China. The ongoing situation in Ukraine is seen as a failure, with no clear victory in sight. Anyone advocating for conflict with Iran or Russia lacks the wisdom necessary for leadership.

Withdrawing from the World Health Organization was significant; the U.S. paid $500 million while China paid only $39 million. This disparity seemed unfair. When Biden rejoined, the U.S. was offered a $500 million deal, despite the previous lower offer. Inflation is largely driven by energy issues. The current administration has reversed previous energy policies, which has delayed benefits. The U.S. has significant energy resources and potential revenue from tariffs, especially considering the European Union's high VAT tax. The U.S. has a $300 billion trade deficit with the EU, which could be addressed through tariffs or increased oil sales. There’s a possibility of traveling to China this year. Regarding BRICS, if they challenge the U.S., it could lead to consequences. A universal tariff is a consideration, but it's not yet ready for implementation.

New details have emerged about the dinner between Trump and Trudeau. During the conversation, Trudeau warned Trump that new tariffs would harm the Canadian economy. In response, Trump joked that if Canada couldn't thrive without taking $100 billion from the U.S. annually, perhaps Canada should become the 51st state, with Trudeau as its governor. Further discussion will follow with the panel.

Following an intense seven-hour session, the US conveyed directly to China the consequences of aligning more closely with Russia. If China were to be an economic provider to Russia, they would only make up 15-20% of the world's economy, while the G7 countries make up more than 50%, giving the US and European partners a range of tools. This meeting, planned as a follow-up to the November call between President Biden and President Xi, was timely and important, especially given the invasion of Ukraine. If Russia were to use chemical weapons, there would be a severe reaction from the global community, the specifics of which would be discussed with partners around the world.

The speaker claims good news is coming from war zones created by Biden. There are no plans to speak with President Xi, but discussions are ongoing between China and the U.S. The speaker denies losing confidence in the National Security Advisor, stating he was simply moved and did not resign. Trade deals are in negotiation, but ultimately, the speaker will set the terms, claiming other countries have been "ripping us off for years." Due to high tariffs, the U.S. is saving billions by not dealing with China. Regarding aid, the speaker questions why the U.S. is the only country providing it. Judicial nominations are proceeding rapidly, aiming for judges who won't demand trials for every illegal immigrant. The speaker believes it's impossible to have a trial for every person who came into the country illegally. The speaker accuses the Wall Street Journal of being "China-oriented" and "bad for this country." The speaker confirms offering U.S. troops to Mexico to combat cartels, who are "trying to destroy our country." A new National Security Advisor will be named within six months. The speaker believes the first 100 days were the greatest in the country's history, citing the elimination of "woke," military strengthening, and decreased inflation, energy costs, and interest rates. The speaker criticizes the media for dishonest polling practices.

Biden's attempt to play both sides has backfired as he lifted sanctions on Iran, allowing them to gain billions of dollars in wealth. Iran is now just 30 days away from obtaining nuclear capability. The previous administration terminated the nuclear deal but failed to take any further action. If the election outcome had been different, a deal with Iran could have been reached within two weeks. However, Biden's decision has made Iran rich again, with China being their top oil customer. This incompetence has led to the imminent threat of Iran acquiring nuclear weapons, which is unacceptable.

The transcript centers on a dramatic framing of Trump’s Davos appearance and a strategic reorientation of U.S. and Western policy away from the post-World War II rules-based order. The speakers argue that Trump’s actions signal the end of the Bretton Woods-era system and the unipolar order, unsettling globalists who want to cling to the old framework. The main points: - Davos as a turning point: Trump walked into the World Economic Forum and framed the room as “friends and maybe a few enemies,” telling European elites he no longer trusts them to defend American interests. He challenged their energy policies as suicidal and criticized Europe for not leveraging its own energy resources, despite North Sea oil and gas; he referenced Europe’s rising electricity prices (claiming a 139% increase) and highlighted wind power versus oil reserves. - The Greenland signal and a broader realignment: While Greenland is noted as a significant detail, the larger story is Trump recentering U.S. strategy toward the Western Hemisphere. This includes stabilizing the hemisphere, deterring mass migration, crushing transnational criminal networks, and preventing hostile powers from owning key assets near U.S. borders. The plan is described as a Monroe Doctrine-like approach, or a Donroe Doctrine, focusing on the Western Hemisphere rather than Brussels’ priorities. - Europe and NATO exposed: Trump’s rhetoric targeted European elites and NATO members, pushing back against what the speakers describe as the old order that expects U.S. protection without reciprocal responsibility. The claim is that the United States is moving toward a national-interest-based posture, rethinking involvement in the UN and NATO, and deciding who is in or out of major security arrangements. - Canada’s contrast at Davos: Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney presented a polite globalist counterpoint—calling for a rupture in the rules-based order and a coalition of middle powers to resist superpowers. The speakers contrast this with Trump’s inward, transactional approach and point to Canada’s perceived ingratitude toward the United States. - Domestic and regional actions: The show notes concrete steps, including Argentina’s open support for Malay’s government, the designation of Mexican cartels as terrorist organizations, and a large Western Hemisphere military meeting (34 countries) to plan actions against cartels and transnational criminal networks. There is emphasis on the United States acting decisively in the region and the broader implications for national security. - Alberta and Canadian diplomacy: Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen (referred to as Scott Benson) comments in Davos about Alberta as a potential natural partner for the United States, illustrating a shift in how Washington is evaluating regional partnerships. The contrast with Carney’s call for a rules-based order underscores the political climate. - Money and minerals emphasis: The speaker pivots to the financial implications of a shifted world order, arguing that money is moving into mining stocks as the U.S. seeks to secure domestic supply chains. The narrative highlights a surge in gold and silver prices and a pivot to mining equities as a strategic investment response to geopolitical shifts. - Vanguard Mining and specific metals: The sponsor Vanguard Mining is presented as exposing a diversified portfolio across five metals—gold, copper, uranium, lithium, and molybdenum—with direct exposure to projects in British Columbia, Argentina, and Paraguay. China’s dominance over these critical minerals is outlined: China’s control of lithium refining (60–70% of world capacity), copper refining and consumption (roughly 58% of refined copper), and molybdenum production (42–45% of global output), plus new export restrictions on moly powders. The company’s portfolio, including a focus on the Pokitos-1 lithium project in Argentina, is highlighted as strategically significant for Western supply chains. The ticker UUUFF is mentioned for Vanguard Mining, with availability on major U.S. exchanges. Overall, the transcript asserts a geopolitical and economic shift away from the existing global order toward a more transactional, hemisphere-centered American strategy, with mining and critical minerals playing a key role in national security and economic policy.

Donald Trump, you may have held the presidency, but your actions are disgraceful. You are a convicted felon and have shown disdain for your allies while flattering Putin. Canada is your best neighbor and trading partner, and we refuse to be intimidated by your grifter politics. We will uphold the international order, support NATO, and assist Ukraine. This is not just a diversion for you; you need to explain to the American people why you surrounded yourself with so many dishonest individuals. The American and Canadian people will not tolerate it. Anytime, anywhere, we are ready to confront you.

Ro Khanna (Speaker 1) and the other speaker debate Obama’s Iran policy and its consequences, referencing actions, deals, and geopolitical alignments. - The other speaker asserts that under Obama there were 14 wire transfers to a Swiss account linked to Hezbollah between 2014 and 2016, totaling 1.7 billion dollars, which he says Obama told Congress were frozen Iranian assets. He also claims a back channel to Tehran through Valerie Jarrett operated after Obama left office, describing it as a shadow government, and alleges pellets of cash were sent to Iran by plane. He questions why money would be sent to Iran given its alleged nuclear ambitions and sponsorship of terrorism. - Ro Khanna counters that Obama was a great statesman who left America safer, noting that 97% of enriched uranium was removed, American service members deaths were avoided, and gas prices did not rise as claimed by the other speaker. He says Obama did not give China a larger role in the region and did not harden the IRGC; instead, Obama engaged in diplomacy to bring China, Russia, and European allies on board toward a path to a non-nuclear Iran. - The other speaker insists Obama sent money to the Iranians and that they resumed enrichment. Khanna responds, “That’s not true.” The other speaker clarifies that a deal was reached to remove 97% of enriched uranium, and assets unfrozen were Iranian assets, not U.S. money, with broad international involvement (China, Russia, France, UK, Canada, the U.S.). He says Obama tried to torpedo the deal and that APEC and Netanyahu opposed it, which dragged the U.S. into more conflict in the Middle East. He argues Obama was against the Iraq War and favored normalization toward Iran, with broad global support, but claims AIPAC and Netanyahu undermined that effort. - Khanna pushes back, suggesting the claim that Obama delivered on preventing a nuclear-armed Iran is inaccurate, asserting that 10 presidents before Trump all claimed Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon, and stating that Obama delivered 97% out in some sense while the other speaker reiterates that Obama sent money to Iran. The other speaker emphasizes the world’s broad support—Russia, China, Canada, the U.K., France, and others—lost or shifted away, implying that U.S. leadership faltered and that the world coalition was lost. - The discussion shifts to what U.S. policy should be: a return to “team America,” addressing gas prices, avoiding further wars, and a preference for leadership that aligns with Israel’s stance as framed by Netanyahu and AIPAC, according to the other speaker. Khanna notes ongoing debate about who holds influence, and the dialogue ends with a mutual acknowledgment of continuing the conversation, thanking each other and Maria.

The speaker states that the G7 used to be the G8, but Barack Obama and Trudeau didn't want Russia included. The speaker believes this was a mistake, claiming that if Russia were still included, there would be no war currently. They also assert that if Trump were president four years ago, there would be no war. The speaker says that Russia was thrown out of the G8 around eight or nine years ago, which they claimed was a big mistake, even before entering politics. They argue that excluding Russia complicates discussions, as much time is spent talking about them while they are not at the table. The speaker expects to accomplish a lot, with a primary focus on trade, particularly with Canada, expressing confidence in reaching a resolution.

Donald Trump, you may have held the presidency, but your actions are disgraceful. You're a convicted felon and treat allies with disdain while flattering Putin. Canada is your best neighbor and trading partner, and we won't be intimidated by your grifter politics. We will uphold the international order, support NATO, and stand with Ukraine. This is a diversion for you, but you need to explain to Americans why you've surrounded yourself with so many dishonest individuals. The American and Canadian people will not tolerate it. We're ready to confront you anytime, anywhere.

In 2025, Canada will chair the G7. The speaker is currently in Kyiv with Ursula and Antonio of the European Commission and Council. They have wanted peace and believe in it now more than ever.

The speaker stated they want ICE to target Democratic inner cities, specifically sanctuary cities, because that's where the people are. They cited New York, Chicago, and LA as examples. The speaker believes Chicago has a bad governor, Pritzker, who is possibly the worst in the country. They claim Chicago, New York and LA have been overrun by criminals, many of whom are not from those cities or California. The speaker alleges Biden allowed 21 million people into the country, vast numbers of whom were murderers, killers, gang members, and people from jails emptied into the U.S. They believe most of these people are in blue, Democrat-run cities and that Democrats think they will use them to vote, but that this will not happen.

I'm heading to Mar-a-Lago to meet with President-elect Trump to discuss creating an economic union between the US and Canada. There's been talk about this for decades, and now feels like the right time. Canadians want to maintain their sovereignty while exploring free trade options. Canada has vast resources and a population comparable to California, so the idea of uniting for economic strength makes sense. A passport system, similar to the EU, could address sovereignty concerns. Many Canadians are interested in this approach rather than losing their identity. With Justin Trudeau's leadership faltering, there's an opportunity for collaboration, and I'm eager to be part of it.

Trump may have already launched a war, restarting Biden and Obama's wars. The United Arab Emirates won't allow the US to use its base in Abu Dhabi for an attack. Iran is better than others who stand with Israel or do nothing for Palestine. A war on Iran is what Netanyahu wants, who has been dragging Trump in his direction. Trump came to power claiming he was a man of peace and wanted a Nobel Peace Prize, but now he is being dragged into military actions. An attack on Iran would be a huge disaster for the region, the world's economy, and everybody. Netanyahu dreams of being the new imperial leader controlling the Middle East. Netanyahu seems to control Trump. The whole crowd around Trump is Zionist and totally supportive of Israel. Trump has forced Netanyahu to accept a temporary ceasefire, but now supports violations of every ceasefire by Netanyahu. This will lead to disasters for everybody, including the United States.

There’s nothing that China, Canada, or Mexico can do tonight to prevent the tariffs from being implemented tomorrow. This is not a negotiating tool; it’s an economic decision due to significant trade deficits. Canada has a nearly $200 billion deficit with the U.S., and it’s unfair for the U.S. to subsidize Canada. Mexico has a $250 billion deficit, and while border crossings have decreased, the past administration allowed many criminals to enter the U.S. Fentanyl, primarily produced in China, is a major issue, with much of it coming through Mexico and Canada. Overall, these countries have not treated the U.S. fairly.

The current situation stems from Justin Trudeau's actions, particularly his recent comments regarding Kamala Harris. His approach has strained relationships during crucial trade negotiations with the new administration. Any failures in this regard are directly attributed to him, and there is a desire for a reset once he is no longer in office. Efforts are being made to repair and build relationships that should have been established over the past four years. Maintaining good relations with both Democrats and Republicans is essential for effective diplomacy, and expressing a preference for one party over another undermines that effort. Ultimately, the responsibility for the damaged relationship lies squarely with Trudeau.