reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The auditor's concerns reveal mismanagement and potential breaches in the Fulton County election, where President Biden won by 12,000 votes. Evidence suggests that unidentified ballots were brought in, creating a breach in custody of 9,000 to 19,000 ballots. Fulton County printed around 20,000 ballots independently, bypassing the contracted printer. The whereabouts and legitimacy of these ballots remain unknown. The auditor also observed unidentified individuals delivering ballots, indicating a reckless election management. There is circumstantial evidence of intent to cause chaos and potential fraud. A contract with a group called Happy Faces, which has intriguing financial ties, raises further suspicions. Their involvement in ballot counting suggests an intention to manipulate the election outcome.

Secretary of State Raffensperger sent a contractor to Fulton County, known for its voting issues. The contractor witnessed double scanning of ballots, unidentified individuals taking election materials, and discussions about disrupting the election. A 29-page report detailing errors, mismanagement, and chaos in the election was known to state officials since November. This contradicts Raffensperger's claims during a phone call with President Trump. It is unlikely that Raffensperger's office was unaware of the report.

Several counties expressed concerns about certifying election results but were told by the Secretary of State to do so. Out of the eight counties I personally spoke to, six said they were forced to certify. One county was only 106 votes off, but the Secretary of State's office insisted on certification. Another small county was 2.3% off and was told to recertify. When the Secretary of State visited Coffee County, they brought three people with guns, badges, and handcuffs, along with two Dominion Tech representatives, creating an intimidating atmosphere. During the recount, there were no Democrats or Republicans present, and the Dominion techs struggled to get the machines to work. The Secretary of State was unresponsive and unhelpful throughout the process.

A Georgia election official, who is a Democrat, discovered that none of the straight party Republican tickets in the recent runoff were being scanned. She contacted Dominion, the company responsible for the voting machines, and expressed her concern about the ballots going to adjudication instead of being counted. Dominion insisted that she just push the green button. Frustrated, she threatened to contact the local media. Dominion quickly sent someone to fix the issue. The Dominion representative acknowledged the problem and made a phone call. Ten minutes later, he returned and assured her that everything was fixed. It is important to note that the voting machines were not connected to the internet.

Fulton County, Georgia admits in a consent decree that 3,600 ballots were duplicated, with 36 batches involved. This raises concerns about potential wrongdoing. We eagerly await further information and facts to emerge. It marks the start of a significant period in the ongoing voter situation.

At 11:05 PM, everyone was told to leave due to a false water main break. However, the real issue was a toilet leak earlier in the day, which had no impact on the election. The water main break announcement was likely made to clear the room of poll watchers and media. The next morning, it was discovered that five women at State Farm Arena had been scanning ballots for about two and a half hours. They were seen repeatedly running the same stack of ballots through the scanner. This incident raises concerns about the integrity of the voting process.

There was meaningful voter fraud in Fulton County, Georgia during the November 2020 election. At least 36 mail-in ballots were double counted, totaling over 4,000 votes. The Atlanta Journal Constitution also found that hundreds of ballots were improperly duplicated. Surveillance footage showed ballots being scanned multiple times, but the county won't answer how many times they were counted. Audit tally sheets were falsified, with fabricated vote totals. A whistleblower noticed that the mail-in ballots had no creases and were filled out by a printer. Over 200 mail-in ballot images were not included in the hand count audit results. Additionally, nearly 35,000 voters who had moved out of their county of residence still voted illegally. It is important to find out the truth and protect democracy.

Fulton County reported 59,000 votes on Election Day, but the speaker believes the actual number is around 22,000, suggesting 37,000 votes were inserted. Evidence from Carter Jones, a consultant, shows that Fulton County had 21,843 votes with 655 provisionals. Notably, there is a screenshot from November 5th, a day and a half after the election, showing an incompatible number of open and closed polling places. A former employee, Dwight Brower, mentions about 14,000 people casting ballots. The transcript ends with a question about the confirmed vote count of 14,152 at 5 p.m.

In early 2020, concerns arose about voter rolls in Fulton County, Georgia having more voters than the population. Chain of custody documents were requested but not provided, leading to doubts about election certification. Issues included drop boxes, surveillance tapes, and absentee ballot processing with a failed electronic signature verification system costing over $1 million. Certification votes were split 2-3, with 147,000 absentee ballots counted in the November 2020 election. Translation: Concerns about voter rolls in Fulton County, Georgia led to doubts about election certification due to missing chain of custody documents and issues with drop boxes, surveillance tapes, and absentee ballot processing. The failed electronic signature verification system cost over $1 million. Certification votes were split 2-3, with 147,000 absentee ballots counted in the November 2020 election.

Approximately 25,000 ballots were not created from the usual PDF format for the election process in Maricopa County. These ballots are tailored to specific geographical areas to account for different voting preferences. The ballots are created in advance in PDF format for mail-in and early voting convenience. However, the quality of the printed ballots in this case was significantly lower than expected, indicating a problem with the printing process.

In Gwinnett County, approximately 270 people went to a ballot box, but 1,862 ballots were deposited according to the custody document. After reviewing 24 hours of video footage, it was confirmed that 271 people approached the ballot box, but only 1,962 ballots were seen. The reason for this discrepancy is unknown. There were breakdowns in the process, and at the end of the day, two individuals were supposed to transfer the ballots into bags, but another person appeared and took the 1,962 ballots in two black duffle bags instead of the usual blue cooler. It is unclear who this person was. The supervision of this process falls under the responsibility of the secretary of state of Georgia. It was evident that nobody was intended to review these videos.

Several counties expressed concerns about certifying the election results but were told by the Secretary of State to do so. Out of the eight counties I personally spoke to, six said they were forced to certify. One county was only 106 votes off, but they were still told to certify. Another small county was 2.3% off and had to recertify. When the Secretary of State visited Coffee County, they brought three people with guns, badges, and handcuffs, along with two Dominion Tech representatives. They intimidated the county and conducted a recount without any Democrats or Republicans present. The Dominion techs faced difficulties with the machines, spending two hours trying to resolve the issues. The Secretary of State was unresponsive and unhelpful throughout the process.

Breaking news from Georgia: the hearing in Fulton County did not go as hoped. A Democrat judge ruled against the Republican party's request regarding the hiring of poll workers, where only 1% are Republican. The judge denied the lawsuit and expressed frustration over the additional drop-off locations for ballots. While he confirmed there would be no drop boxes, he acknowledged the need for poll observers. However, a notice from the election office stated that poll observers would not be allowed. Concerns about the integrity of the election process in Fulton County remain high, with a call for a significant number of votes to ensure fairness.

The investigation confirms 380,761 missing ballot images from election day. Fulton County was subpoenaed for recount images, not election day ones. It's unclear why the election day images are missing. Fulton County should ensure every vote has a corresponding ballot image. Translation: The investigation found 380,761 missing ballot images from election day. Fulton County was asked for recount images, not those from election day. The reason for the missing images is unknown. Fulton County should ensure that every vote has a corresponding ballot image.

Clark County Technical employees independently discovered that votes were changing on voting machines and USB drives overnight. They were only allowed a visual inspection of the USB drives and denied a forensic examination.

There was meaningful voter fraud in Fulton County, Georgia during the November 2020 election. At least 36 mail-in ballots were double counted, totaling over 4,000 votes. The Atlanta Journal Constitution also found that hundreds of ballots were improperly duplicated. Surveillance footage obtained by Voter GA showed ballots being scanned multiple times. Fulton County failed to provide over 100,000 audit tally sheets, and when they were finally turned over, falsified totals were discovered. A whistleblower noticed that the mail-in ballots had no creases and were filled out by a printer. Additionally, an analysis found that nearly 35,000 voters in Georgia illegally voted in their old county. These irregularities raise serious concerns about the integrity of the election.

- The discussion centers on ballot processing in Maricopa County, with several shipments arriving after the initial belief that counting was near completion. Speaker 0 notes that the Wednesday before the Friday they quit voting, and ten days before they quit tabulating, more truckloads of ballots came in, leading to the question: “how can you not know how many ballots are still out there?” - Speaker 1 asks for clarification: “They thought they were done.” The conversation confirms multiple times that those running the counting rooms believed they were almost done, or would be done, on Wednesday morning, then Thursday morning, then Friday morning, and the process extended into the next week. - Trucks bringing ballots arrived on the third, fourth, and fifth days, continuing throughout the last week. The last day mentioned is the tenth, with ballots still arriving. The company involved is Runback, described as doing high-speed scanning and printing of duplications and military ballots. There was no observer presence at Runback, and Speaker 0 indicates she had not been called to work there; she does not know exactly what Runback was doing (printing vs. scanning). - It is stated that all high-speed scanning occurs at Runback, and the ballots go to Runback. There is uncertainty about off-site scanning and whether Dominion equipment was involved. Speaker 0 clarifies: “They were duplications, the ballots that wouldn’t read through the tabulation machines. They were ballots that came in from military and overseas.” The number of additional sources for ballots beyond military/overseas is unknown, and Speaker 0 suggests this is a question for county employees to explain. - About the counting process: Speaker 0 confirms that the ballots went through tabulation machines and that adjudication work took place for those late arrivals. They observed the ballots being processed, but did not know the exact totals for certain days. - Daily volumes are described. Speaker 0 estimates: one day a shift might handle 90,000 ballots, and some days had similar volumes across three shifts; other days had fewer. There were days when as few as 15,000 ballots were processed. The “back door” arrivals are contrasted with the front door, with Speaker 0 noting that all back door ballots were received through back entries, not the front door. The remaining ballots in the latter part of the period continued to come in and be tabulated, with ongoing full-time shifts through the eighth, ninth, and tenth days. - The episode concludes with Speaker 1 seeking further explanation, and Speaker 0 indicating that some of the details were not fully known and that a county employee should clarify where the incoming ballots came from during the latter part of the period.

At 11:05 PM, everyone was told to leave due to a false water main break. However, the real issue was a toilet leak earlier in the day, which had no impact on the election. The water main break announcement was likely made to clear the room of poll watchers and media. The next morning, it was discovered that five women at State Farm Arena had been scanning ballots for about two and a half hours. They were seen repeatedly running the same stack of ballots through the scanner. This raises concerns about the integrity of the voting process. The incident at State Farm Arena on November 3rd, 2020, undermines the principle of one person, one vote.

During the election, there were damaged mail-in ballots that couldn't be read by scanners. The board decided to duplicate these ballots using pink highlighters. However, the highlighter couldn't be read by the scanners either, so all the duplicated ballots had to be fixed. The solution was to give workers stacks of blank mail-in ballots to individually fill in the correct ovals with a dark pen. This process went on for hours without observation until the observers confronted the deputy commissioner. Eventually, thousands of mail-in ballots were counted this way. This raises concerns about the integrity of the process.

The speakers discuss the flow of ballots and the involvement of a company called Runback. Trucks delivering ballots arrived on the third, then the fourth, and the fifth, continuing for days. The last day of the speaker’s involvement was the tenth, and trucks were still coming in. The ballots were coming from Runback, a company that does high‑speed scanning and printing of duplications, and the speaker mentions military ballots being produced or processed by Runback, though there is uncertainty about exactly what Runback was doing. When asked whether the ballots were printed or scanned off-site, the speaker is unsure. It is stated that all the high‑speed scanning occurs at Runback, and that those ballots go to Runback. There were no observers at Runback, and the speaker had not been called to work there. The question is raised about whether the scanning was done on-site at the Maricopa County structure, but the response indicates that scanning was not on-site and occurred at Runback where there are very high‑speed scanners. The question of whether Dominion equipment was involved is addressed: the ballots being scanned were not related to Dominion. The purpose of scanning the ballots in advance of tabulation on Dominion equipment is then explained: they were duplications of ballots that would not read through the tabulation machines, specifically ballots that came in from military and overseas. However, the speaker notes there were more ballots than just those, with trays of ballots being brought in, and uncertainty remains about where the rest were coming from. The speaker suggests that the remaining questions about the sources of these ballots should be answered by the county employees. In summary, the discussion centers on: a sequence of ballot deliveries over several days; Runback handling high‑speed scanning and duplications off-site; uncertainty about whether ballots were printed or scanned and by whom; the absence of observers at Runback; scanners used were not Dominion; the purpose of off-site scanning was to duplicate ballots that wouldn’t read through the tabulation machines, including military and overseas ballots; and unresolved questions about the origin of additional ballots, which require explanation from county staff. The exchange ends with a note that the remaining questions about the ballots’ origins are for the county employees to explain.

- The discussion centers on Fulton County’s ballot-seizure case and the implication that the affidavit relied on was built from recycled conspiracy theories by a known conspiracy figure. It is asserted that the judge was not told these issues had already been relitigated, and that the administration appears intent on applying the same approach elsewhere. - Question raised: can these efforts be stopped, given the underlying pattern and what the other side is pursuing? And what is their plan for 2026 if they lack the 2020 conspiracies to lean on? - Jen notes her role as counsel in the Fulton County matter and declines to comment further on the specifics. - Jessica forecasts that Trump-aligned actors will pull out 2020 ballots and photos, arguing that the numbers don’t add up and that the machines were faulty and the people fudged because, allegedly, in Fulton County they did. She emphasizes that there is no evidence that the irregularities would have changed the outcome in Georgia, but acknowledges there were thousands of irregularities, with records destroyed and chain-of-custody issues, and that the recount and audit were of poor quality. She warns that in 2026 the same approach could be used again with untrustworthy machines and flawed audits, and warns that even if actual facts are shown, they would highlight known errors. - Marilyn adds the point that a Barack Obama-appointee judge confirmed the unreliability of the machines and notes a demonstrator at DEFCON Voting Village showed how easily a Dominion machine can be hacked. She cites a view that Biden still won Georgia, despite the “fudged audits,” and argues that the intent behind the questionable procedures was to obscure errors. - Jessica identifies Raffensperger as the official who chose the machines and funded the expansive spending on them, suggesting he did not want critical issues to be exposed. She asserts that the process was designed to avoid scrutiny and that the results were obtained by running ballots through the machine multiple times to adjust numbers, including using test ballots to influence results. - The conversation concludes with a focus on the importance of recounts and audits, and the need for a transparent process in 2026. Jessica argues that Georgia’s issues stemmed from an audit with bogus processes and a recount conducted through machines rather than a hand count at counting tables with observers from both campaigns and the clerk. She asserts that the transparency of the counting process could have mitigated much of the controversy and that the lesson for 2026 is to implement a transparent system.

Two Clark County Technical employees revealed that votes on voting machines and USB drives changed overnight. They were only allowed a visual inspection of the USB drives and denied a forensic examination.

There was meaningful voter fraud in Fulton County, Georgia during the 2020 election. At least 36 batches of mail-in ballots were double counted, totaling over 4,000 votes. The Atlanta Journal Constitution independently reviewed digital ballot images and found hundreds of improperly duplicated ballots. Surveillance footage obtained by Voter GA showed ballots being scanned multiple times. Fulton County failed to provide over 100,000 audit tally sheets, and when they were finally turned over, falsified sheets were found. A whistleblower noticed that the mail-in ballots had no creases and were filled out by a printer. An elections expert found that nearly 35,000 voters illegally voted in their old county. It is important to find out the truth and ensure the integrity of our elections.

A last-minute change involves an additional hand count of ballots, which raises concerns. The normal process is an audit after the election in a controlled environment, which is easier to observe and monitor. Hand counting by tired people in front of others increases the chance of mistakes. Gabriel Sterling, a top election official in Georgia, says election workers are ready for conspiracy theories, chaos, and confusion. They went through it in 2020 with many conspiracy theories and former president Trump contesting the result. He says they know what is ahead.

Several counties expressed concerns about certifying election results but were told by the Secretary of State to certify. Out of the eight counties I personally spoke to, six said they were forced to certify. One county was only 106 votes off, but the Secretary of State's office insisted they certify that number. Another small county was 2.3% off and was told to recertify. When the Secretary of State visited Coffee County, they brought three people with guns, badges, and handcuffs, along with two Dominion Tech representatives, creating an intimidating atmosphere. During the recount, there were no Democrats or Republicans present, and the Dominion techs struggled to get the machines to work. The Secretary of State was unresponsive and unhelpful throughout the process.