reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In Europe, recent violent incidents highlight the impact of mass migration on crime. The speaker warns of a "great replacement" of native populations with migrants, fueled by corrupt elites. They advocate for a strong Christian Europe of sovereign nations to combat the erosion of national identity by Brussels. The speaker calls for decisive action to protect families, culture, and sovereignty from the totalitarian EU. It is a call to arms for Europeans to resist and preserve their heritage.

In 2015, Josh Roche proposed a plan for the EU to accept 1 million asylum seekers yearly, issue euro bonds for financing, and establish safe channels for migrants. He accuses George Soros' NGO of influencing EU institutions to implement this plan, which he believes undermines Christian and national political forces in Europe. This migration issue is not random but part of a deliberate agenda.

The speaker contrasts European political responses to immigration and crime with American policies, arguing that European left-wing politicians ignore urgent problems. They claim: - In Spain, “they just legalized residents of half a million illegal aliens.” - In France, “they throw grenades into hair salons in a broad daylight.” - In Germany, “not a single day goes by without someone being murdered with a knife.” - In Sweden, “you have bomb attack every other day.” The speaker asserts that these are real problems for the European left-wing politicians, yet contends that those politicians do not care. The immediate target is a European debate about the rule of law in the United States and deportation policies: the speaker says, “You are seriously discussing here the rule of law in United States and criticizing American government for deporting illegal aliens, for deporting criminals out of their territory in the same time when Western European cities are gradually turning into a war zone.” A call is made to apply the same approach in Europe: “We should do exactly the same. We should deport them from Europe and not legalize their stay.” The speaker urges listening to them and not to “what you are proposing to all of us,” asserting that “Everybody can see, no, you are enemies of Europe. You hate Europe.” The rhetoric culminates in a warning: “You hate our nations, and you want to destroy the future for our children. We should stop you. We should defeat you politically if we want to survive. Otherwise, it will be the end of Europe.”

In 2015, Josh Roche published a plan stating the EU must accept at least 1 million asylum seekers annually. Financing is critical, and he proposed issuing long-term Euro bonds to finance the migration crisis, including migrants' social welfare. Safe channels must be established for asylum seekers, starting by transporting them from Greece and Italy to destination countries, including Hungary and Austria. This is not accidental but a deliberate plan. The speaker claims they are fighting an organized gang called the Empire of George Soros and NGOs. They allege this group supports those transgressing the legal system, finances illegal activity, and aims to capture main positions inside EU institutions by buying out MPs and leaders. The speaker asserts this plan aims to change Europe, push aside Christian, conservative, and national-based political leaders and voters from EU decision-making bodies, and that migration is not just about migration.

In 2015, George Soros proposed a plan involving the EU accepting 1 million asylum seekers annually, issuing euro bonds for financing, and establishing safe channels for migrants. This plan is seen as an organized effort to change Europe by sidelining conservative, Christian, and national-based political leaders. Soros is accused of influencing EU institutions and supporting illegal activities against nations. The focus is not just on migration, but on reshaping the European Union's decision-making process.

The plan for a united Europe involved encouraging non-white immigration to breed out the indigenous population. An alliance of leftists, capitalists, and Zionists promoted immigration and miscegenation. As resistance grows, the elite camouflages their project with different excuses like temporary guest workers, refugees, or a solution to a shrinking population. However, the real aim remains the same: the genocide of Christian Europeans.

In 2015, George Soros proposed a plan to the EU, calling for the acceptance of 1 million asylum seekers annually, issuing euro bonds for funding, and creating safe channels for migrants. This plan is seen as an organized effort to change Europe by influencing EU institutions and sidelining Christian conservative leaders. Critics argue that Soros and NGOs are undermining national sovereignty.

In 2015, George Soros proposed a plan for the EU to accept 1 million asylum seekers annually and issue euro bonds for financing. He emphasized safe channels for migrants to reach their destination countries, including Hungary. This plan is seen as an organized effort to change Europe by influencing EU institutions and sidelining conservative leaders and voters. The focus is not just on migration, but on broader political objectives.

The exchange centers on claims regarding a plan attributed to George Soros and its alleged global implementation to increase migration to the United States and Europe. Speaker 0 references a 2015 publication by George Soros, stating that the plan has now been implemented worldwide to bring millions of illegals into The United States and into Europe, and notes that Viktor Orban, Hungary’s leader, recently pointed this out. Speaker 1 recalls the details from the 2015 Project Syndicate publication, outlining two main components. First, Soros purportedly argued that the European Union must accept at least a million EU seekers annually. Second, he purportedly emphasized that Abekwa financing is critical and proposed issuing long-term euro bonds to finance the migration crisis, including funding related to migrants, social welfare, and care as they arrive in the European Union. In addition, the plan allegedly called for establishing safe channels for asylum seekers, beginning with moving them from Greece and Italy to their destination countries. The dialogue attributes these specific elements to Soros, presenting them as a policy framework or strategy. Throughout the discussion, Speaker 0 adds a brief, fragmentary remark, “that’s why they don’t like,” which appears to reference opposition or criticism without elaboration within this excerpt. Key claims highlighted in the conversation include: (1) a 2015 Soros plan published in Project Syndicate proposing that the EU accept a minimum of one million asylum seekers annually; (2) the proposal of Abekwa financing as a critical element, including the idea of issuing long-term euro bonds to fund the migration crisis, along with supporting migrants’ social welfare and care needs as they arrive; and (3) the suggestion to create safe channels for asylum seekers, starting with relocating individuals from Greece and Italy to other EU destination countries. The participants frame these points as explanations of a policy approach that they assert has been implemented globally, and they reference Viktor Orban’s commentary to support their argument. The transcript captures a concise allegation-based discussion about Soros’s 2015 proposals, their supposed financing mechanisms, and the establishment of safe relocation channels for asylum seekers, tied to ongoing political debates surrounding migration in Europe and the role of opposition figures such as Viktor Orban.

Europe has accepted over 100 million refugees in the past decade, so taking in another 1.5 million would not be a problem. The speaker believes that the land is promised to them, so they are not concerned about the refugees suffering. They mention knowing the location of live hostages but are not taking action because Biden requested them not to.

The transcript outlines an alleged plan to entrench single-party rule through open borders and related policy shifts. It presents nine steps: 1) Flood the country with millions of illegals by land, sea, and air from around the world, enough to eclipse the populations of 36 states. 2) Prioritize the needs of these noncitizens over American citizens by providing free flights, buses, hotels, meals, and phones, ensuring their loyalty to the importing political party. 3) Keep them in the country at all costs, and attack the language used to describe criminals rather than the criminals themselves; slander critics as racist. 4) Make their privileges irrevocable via city and state sanctuary laws that act as population magnets, codify permanent status, and ensure noncooperation with ICE. 5) Count noncitizens in the census to determine congressional apportionment in the House, which would equal 13 extra congressional districts and substantial electoral power. 6) Wage a large, well-funded lawfare campaign to change state voting laws to legalize mass mail-in ballots with no signature verification and no proof of citizenship, making voter fraud nearly impossible to prove. 7) Lock in a permanent voting majority with campaign promises of lavish benefits and permanent privileges, enshrining generational fealty to the Democratic Party. 8) Win elections. 9) Establish entrenched single-party rule. The best part, according to the speaker, is that tax dollars are funding it.

The speaker discusses a conspiracy theory about replacement migration and the globalist agenda. They claim that the UN, funded by elements of the government, is trying to replace Europeans with immigrants from the third world. They argue that the globalists want to collapse Europe and the USA, drive down wages, and create a total collapse so they can reorganize society. The speaker also mentions plans for a North American Union, sterilization of the third world, and the use of bioweapons. They express concern about the influx of immigrants and the potential for division and conflict. The speaker promotes products from their website and thanks their supporters.

European leaders favoring restrictive migration policies are meeting in Budapest following Hungary's vote to criminalize those aiding asylum seekers, a move defying the EU and human rights groups. Austrian Chancellor Kurz and Hungarian leader Orban, both immigration hardliners, are attending. Hungary also outlawed EU attempts to relocate asylum seekers. Orban views himself as the defender of Christian Europe against a perceived Muslim invasion, a rhetoric that led to his election victory. The "Stop Soros" campaign was popular, despite Hungary having one of the EU's lowest immigration rates. Soros is seen as the personification of a foreign invasion. Human rights groups are disappointed and hope for intervention from the EU and the Council of Europe, which is reviewing the bill. The European Commission is expected to react, but human rights organizations risk jail sentences if they help illegal immigrants apply for asylum. The EU has warned Hungary before, but Orban continues to defy them. The EU can threaten, but excluding a member state is difficult and unpopular. A mini-summit on migration is planned in Brussels this weekend. Despite low immigration numbers, the issue remains urgent, highlighting a gap between reality and perception.

The speaker provocatively asks what would happen if Viktor Orbán were the head of the European Commission or the European Council, noting that a politician needs a vision and that Orbán has one. They point out that in Hungary many people do not agree with him at the national level, because they feel the policy’s impact in their own lives, yet there is a broader European view of Orbán that differs. The speaker observes that Orbán is popular among Europeans, even if not among politicians, because he speaks openly about issues. They credit him with openly addressing migration from the outset, contrasting this with Western European politicians who they claim lied to their own people by saying migration wasn’t a problem. The speaker suggests that Western claims included assurances that “brain surgeons” would arrive, using a metaphor about the idea that with new access, anyone could open a pastry shop in Vienna, implying hollow promises by the EU-era negotiators during enlargement. They state that people remember these deceptions, and that Orbán perceived and highlighted them. The speaker notes that during the Covid period and various crises, Orbán’s approach has been driven by a clear vision and a hardline policy. The overall point is that Orbán’s stance is characterized by clarity about migration and a steadfast, uncompromising political line, which the speaker believes resonates with a broad European audience despite mixed reception at home in Hungary.

In this Wide Awake Media podcast conversation, host Didi Denslow and guest Ivor Cummins—a biochemical engineer, nutrition expert known as the Fat Emperor—discuss health paradigms, seed oils, geopolitics, and emerging technologies, with a recurring emphasis on waking up to structured power dynamics. Seeds oils and the “devil’s triad” - Cummins presents a framework he calls the “devil’s triad” to explain modern obesity and diabetes trends: sugars, refined grains or refined tweeds, and seed oils. He cites American data indicating 64% of adults over 45 are prediabetic or diabetic, suggesting the triad drives these conditions. Cutting out sugars, refined carbohydrates, and seed oils is portrayed as a path to reversing obesity and diabetes epidemics. - Seed oils are described as being extracted with hexane and solvents under high heat/pressure. They include sunflower, safflower, rapeseed (and other seed-derived oils). He states they are high in omega-6 fats, used as signaling molecules in inflammatory processes, and should be kept to very low dietary levels (current US intake around 15% of calories versus a recommended under 0.5%). He notes issues in processing: hydrogenation and molecular damage, plus deodorizing, bleaching, and color adjustments that mask natural signals to avoid consumption. - He contrasts seed oils with natural fats from real foods: olives (olive oil), animal fats like lard and tallow, and butter, which are deemed acceptable. He references historical and industry context: seed oils originated from lubricants used in engines (and later hydrogenated for food), with Crisco marking their rise; he attributes a shift in public health trends to decisions in the mid- to late-20th century, including influential thoughts by Ancel Keys on saturated fats. - The discussion also touches the economics and incentives: seed oils are cheap, shelf-stable, and favored by global supply chains and processed foods; this is linked to industry strategies and ties between food, pharma, and academic funding. Some guests’ positions align on seed oils as a major driver of chronic disease, though Cummins also acknowledges the role of refined carbohydrates and sugars. Diet, personal change, and practical guidance - The host shares personal experience: eliminating seed oils improved health, including belly fat reduction. - Repertoire of alternative fats suggested includes high-quality olive oil, coconut oil, tallow, lard from well-raised pigs (with caveats about omega-6 content), and avocado oil as a more expensive option. Geopolitics, digital identity, and cultural shifts - Digital ID and civil liberties: Ireland’s progress toward digital ID is discussed, illustrating a “boiling frog” dynamic: government IDs exist but may become mandatory over time. Cummins underscores civil disobedience, awareness, and lobbying as means to resist, arguing that politicians report to higher, unelected networks. He asserts EU structures (EU Commission, European Parliament) mimic Soviet-era governance, creating a centralized power apparatus. - Hate speech law in Ireland: Cummins describes an earlier hate speech framework (1986 incitement to hatred) as effective, and a proposed newer framework with broad, protected classes as a potential threat to civil rights, warning that the pre-crime model resembles Minority Report, 1984, and Brave New World. He suggests public scrutiny of whom politicians report to. - Global networks and governance: The conversation invokes a historical view of global power networks (Rhodes, Milner, Rothschilds, Rockefellers) and institutions like the Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderberg, Trilateral Commission, and the CIA. Cummins sees these organizations as orchestrating global policy and economy, with a current sense of tension due to BRICS dynamics, shifting American leadership, and challenges to the old oligarchies. - Immigration and demographic strategy: He cites Denmark, Hungary, Poland, and Switzerland as examples with restrictive immigration policies and self-sufficiency requirements. Denmark, for instance, is highlighted for its stringent residency rules and crime data transparency on migrants. He contrasts Ireland’s relatively permissive approach to immigration with these models, discussing the Kalergi Plan as a shorthand for a demographic strategy, and argues there has been a deliberate, years-long push to alter European demographics, partly framed by climate discourse and social narratives. - Climate narrative and AI: Cummins notes perceived weaknesses in the climate-change narrative, acknowledging growing awareness and industry signals that climate policies may be economically unsustainable. He predicts data centers and AI infrastructure will continue to drive energy demand, while asserting AI is a tool with significant rote-task capability but no true sentience. He argues the public is increasingly skeptical about climate catastrophism, while acknowledging the real-world shift toward data-driven, centralized control. Solutions and events - Awareness and education are repeatedly stressed as essential first steps. Cummins envisions a non-conspiratorial, docudrama-style approach to explain power politics and history, aiming to reach a mass audience with credible, non-fringe framing. - Concrete steps discussed include focusing on Denmark-like models for immigration policy, local and national political engagement (email campaigns to MPs, peaceful in-person events like Ireland’s IRL forum), and media reform initiatives to counterbalance globalist influence. - He promotes practical financial preparedness (physical gold and silver) as protective measures amid expected market volatility and potential fiat-currency depreciation. Closing note - The interview ends with a reiteration to avoid seed oils, stay awake, and engage in informed civic action. The speakers emphasize a broad, systemic view of health, governance, and technology, urging proactive public discourse and engagement to influence policy directions.

The speaker claims that Europe is experiencing an invasion, not a refugee crisis, but a mass Islamization that has been ongoing for 50-60 years. They assert that a global political agenda by the world's powerful aims to destroy Europe culturally and religiously, specifically to destroy Christianity with the help of a massive Islamic population. The speaker references a sociologist's calculation that in 30-40 years, Muslims will be the majority in Europe because European people have few children while Muslims have many.

European leaders favoring restrictive migration policies are meeting in Budapest following Hungary's vote to criminalize individuals or groups aiding asylum seekers. This move defies the EU and human rights groups. Austrian Chancellor Kurtz and Hungarian leader Orban, both immigration hardliners, are attending. Hungary also outlawed EU attempts to relocate asylum seekers. Orban views himself as the defender of Christian Europe against a perceived Muslim invasion, a rhetoric that led to his election victory. The "Stop Soros" campaign, popular in Hungary, paints George Soros as the organizer of this "invasion," despite Hungary having low immigration rates. Human rights groups are disappointed and look to the EU and the Council of Europe for recourse. The EU Commission is expected to react, but Orban has defied the EU before. While the EU can threaten sanctions, excluding a member state is difficult, especially with rising populist support. A mini-summit on migration is planned in Brussels, highlighting the issue's urgency despite low immigrant numbers.

In 2015, George Soros published a plan to bring millions of illegal immigrants to the US and Europe, as noted by Hungary's Viktor Orban. Soros proposed the EU accept at least a million asylum seekers annually and establish safe channels for their relocation from Greece and Italy to other EU countries. Orban's criticism of Soros is attributed to his opposition to these policies.

George Soros is a foreign-born, left-wing individual who aims to change the nature of our country. Leaked memos reveal three key points: a belief in their success at influencing global immigration policy, the refugee crisis as an opportunity to further this influence, and the perception of the refugee crisis as the new normal. Soros is a strong supporter of open borders, advocating for unrestricted movement for all. He views the immigration crisis as a means to advance his broader immigration agenda.

The speaker asserts that political influence in the United States comes from foreign and special interests, claiming “They’ve bought our politicians. They’ve thrown their Jewish money at our politicians.” This funding, the speaker says, has sustained “forever wars,” and is tied to a broader pattern of influence that the speaker attributes to a deliberate agenda. In response, the speaker declares an uncompromising stance: “as American Christians, it’s America first. It’s America only.” The speaker emphasizes a resolve to resist what is described as entrenched interference, asserting, “we will have no choice but to declare our country a white Christian country.” A central aim named by the speaker is pushing back against an “immigrant takeover,” which is said to have been brought about by those who have “paid off our politicians.” The speaker expands this claim to a global scope, stating that these forces have “flooded Europe” and “flooded America with all different types of brown people and Middle Eastern Muslims.” This phrasing is used to identify the purported agents of influence as “the head of the snake behind the brownification of America,” and the speaker further alleges that these groups or interests have “bought out hundreds of millions of dollars in politicians in our country.” In naming specific individuals, the speaker cites Joe Biden, Beijing, CCP Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, and Mary Aladdin, presenting them as part of the described network of influence. The overall message links political funding, immigration, and demographic change to a conspiracy aimed at reorganizing American political and social structure away from the speaker’s asserted vision of America. The speaker’s framing ties national allegiance to a combination of religious identity (white Christian) and ethnic framing, while portraying immigration and non-white population growth as a deliberate strategy by unseen actors. The overall claim centers on the belief that political power in the United States has been captured by financial interests tied to immigration and international actors, necessitating a national repositioning to prioritize “America first” and “America only.”

In September 2015, Josh Roche outlined a comprehensive plan for addressing the migration crisis, proposing that the EU accept at least one million asylum seekers annually. He emphasized the need for additional financing, suggesting long-term euro bonds to support migrants' welfare upon arrival. A key aspect of his plan involved establishing safe channels for asylum seekers, particularly from Greece and Italy to Hungary. This situation is not merely a series of random events but part of a deliberate strategy. There are concerns about organizations, referred to as the "Empire of George Soros," that allegedly support illegal activities undermining national regulations. The broader issue encompasses the transformation of Europe, aiming to marginalize Christian and conservative political forces from decision-making within the EU.

Josh Roche published a plan in 2015 calling for the EU to accept 1 million asylum seekers annually and issue euro bonds for funding. He proposed safe channels for asylum seekers to reach their destination countries, including Hungary. This plan is seen as part of a larger effort by George Soros and NGOs to influence European Union decision-making against Christian and national-based political forces.

George Soros is the speaker's opponent, commanding an army of money, NGOs, universities, research institutions, and Brussels bureaucracy. Soros uses this army to impose his will on opponents like Hungarians, believing their values caused 20th-century horrors. The speaker claims the opposite is true: their values prevent repeating history's mistakes. Nazi and communist horrors arose because some Western European states abandoned Christian values, and today's progressives are planning to do the same.

The speaker discusses the issue of immigration and the potential dangers it poses. They argue that there is a deliberate plan to undermine countries by encouraging mass migration, which will ultimately lead to the destruction of national borders and cultures. The speaker also highlights the use of propaganda and censorship to control the narrative and demoralize the population. They emphasize the need for individuals to resist and speak out against these actions. The speaker calls for strong leadership and a united front to confront the challenges posed by mass migration and the erosion of national sovereignty.

Speaker 0: Argues Europe has not yet learned to be multicultural and will undergo a transformation; Europe will no longer be monolithic, and Jews will be at the center of this transformation. They claim Jews will be resented for their leading role, but without that leading role and transformation Europe will not survive. Speaker 1: States a moral, political, social, and economic obligation to look after refugees, presenting three alternatives: leave refugees on beaches, send them back to be killed in Syria, or let them walk into razor-wire borders, or welcome them. Speaker 0: Reiterates that Jews will be at the center of Europe’s transformation and that Jews will be resented for their leading role; without this leading role and transformation, Europe will not survive. Speaker 2: Cites 65,000,000 displaced people worldwide, a number larger than the UK’s population, noting that governments are feckless in broker peace agreements (e.g., Syria), which has created this situation. Speaker 3: Reports that billionaire George Soros says he is investing $500,000,000 to start-ups founded by refugees, in response to Barack Obama’s call to action initiative asking companies to help refugees and migrants. Speaker 4: Notes that Norwegian society has a short history with ethnic minorities at scale and asserts there is work to do; mentions rising antisemitism, Islamophobia, and racism, and the ongoing need for NGOs like the Center Against Racism. Speaker 5: Responds to criticism of the Prime Minister’s migration policy, suggesting that people in the country do not want to close themselves off but do want a fair system; describes a contributory social insurance system in other member states where people pay taxes before they can draw benefits, implying a preference for a sustainable, earned access to benefits. Speaker 6: States that the European Union was designed to give minority organizations influence in Europe’s management; references Kalergi and a 1945 article read by Harry Truman, claiming Truman adopted Kalergi’s plan as U.S. policy; asserts that after 1965 real demographic changes would be seen; cites Brock Chisholm, former WHO director, claiming the goal is to limit birth rates and promote mixed marriages to create a single world race under a central authority. Speaker 7: Concludes with the claim that Jews want to exterminate the European race and that the strategy to weaken Europe involves dissolving European nations, destroying cultural heritage and national traditions, replacing them with the European Union, and inviting Africans, Middle Easterners, and Asians to dilute the blood of Europeans through miscegenation to produce a degenerate mixed race.