reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I worry about delays in vote counting and false claims of rigging or theft. We need to finish counting quickly and accurately to prevent misinformation. Foreign disinformation is not a major concern. The focus should be on ensuring a proper count and debunking any misconduct allegations.

I aim to win this election by convincing people to vote for me, rather than relying on a corrupt government to hinder my opponent's candidacy. This goes against the principles I learned as a child when pledging allegiance to America. We should not resemble a banana republic, where the ruling party employs the police to arrest political rivals.

I prioritize the preservation of American democracy and believe in free and fair elections. There is a dangerous extremist movement in America that threatens our democracy. We must all take action to protect it, as history, the world, and future generations are watching. The vice president and I have been advocating for voting rights since the beginning of our administration, and I urge all Americans to join us in this cause. We are a nation of possibilities, where the power lies with the people. Together, there is nothing we cannot achieve. Paid for by the...

Speakers discuss the severity and novelty of threats to the United States’ political system, focusing on Russian interference and the digital domain. - All acknowledge that the country faced a cataclysmic disruption to its political system that is unlike prior experiences. Speaker 2 notes, as a Vietnam veteran, that fundamental institutions were jeopardized then but proved resilient, and expresses hope for a similar outcome now. - Speaker 1 emphasizes two points: (1) Vladimir Putin’s determination to shape political landscapes inside Russia and abroad, and (2) the consequential role of the digital domain, which allowed Russian intelligence to exploit and manipulate more effectively, culminating in the twenty sixteen election. - They note that Russian interference historically involved exploiting elections, but never with such aggression, directness, or multidimensional methods. The Internet and modern technology serve as a huge enabler for influencing opinion and undermining fundamental systems. - There is a discussion of whether this manipulation was unforeseen. Speaker 2 indicates it goes back to the Soviet era with attempts to influence elections, but the magnitude in twenty sixteen was unprecedented. The digital environment provides malefactors with more opportunities to attack and influence. - The panel explains active measures as fabricating or propagating stories (even patently false ones) to advance a narrative, color perceptions, and lend legitimacy to political actors. They note that the Russians focused on specific voter blocks in states like Wisconsin and Michigan, with estimates that 70,000–80,000 votes could have swung the election. - They discuss methods beyond information operations, including collecting information (e.g., DNC and DCCC email breaches) and money-related tactics: money laundering, disguising funding sources for political actions, and potential extortion or blackmail. They stress that collusion is a tool in the Russians’ kit and that they recruit or exploit individuals where openings exist. - Following the money is highlighted as essential across national security domains; FBI financial investigators and intelligence analysts play key roles, and there is confidence that Mueller and others will trace financial pathways to uncover motivations. - The distinction between cyber warfare and conventional warfare is acknowledged: there are no tanks or planes, but the cyber realm constitutes a war for democracy. A robust response is needed to strengthen the cyber environment, including proposals for a congressional independent commission to assess and strategize future protections, involving engineers, technologists, scientists, and private sector input. - They reflect on why the nation did not respond with the immediacy seen after physical attacks (e.g., 9/11). The lack of a physical rubble-like trigger makes cyber threats harder to mobilize a national response. Leadership issues are cited: when the White House diminishes the CIA, FBI, NSA, or intelligence and law enforcement, it undermines efforts to address the threat. - They recount briefings to the president-elect in January, noting high confidence levels in assessments that did not rely on the dossier; the bigger concern is a perceived indifference to the Russian threat and the denigration of security institutions. - They stress the importance of institutional integrity: the press, law enforcement, and intelligence are pillars of democracy, and denigration of these institutions undermines U.S. credibility abroad. They advocate for stronger checks and balances and reiterate their commitment to truthful reporting and protecting the country. - The speakers, experienced and apolitical, emphasize loyalty to the Constitution and the need for decisive leadership and sustained commitment to democratic institutions, despite political challenges. They conclude with a solemn commitment to safeguard the country and its democratic framework.

We admire your fight for your homeland and promise to support you. In 2017, we will go back to Washington to push against Russian aggression. Our fight is not with the Russian people, but with Putin. We will inform the American people of your bravery and make the case against Putin to the world. We believe you will win because of your courage. The world is watching because we cannot allow Putin to succeed here, as it would set a dangerous precedent for other countries.

The recent election south of the border has raised concerns about the rise of fascism and threats to our values. This situation mirrors struggles faced by countries like Venezuela, Cuba, and Ukraine, where populist leaders jeopardize independence and way of life. Having spent 14 years in conflict zones, I understand the harsh realities faced by those affected, including victims of torture and grieving families. It is crucial for us, as Greens, to prevent such circumstances in Canada. I am grateful that the party reached out to me to potentially return as co-leader, pending a member vote.

We are facing infiltration from various sources, including communist China and globalists. If Joe Biden becomes president, he will exert control over us indefinitely. We must not allow lies to shape our future and prevent us from maintaining our constitutional republic. Outside, there are peaceful protests with participants from all over the country and even the world. These individuals understand the importance of democracy and the idea of the United States of America.

We prioritize securing the border to protect our nation. Undocumented individuals should be treated with respect. They have helped build our country.

I will prevent World War 3. The current situations in the Middle East and Ukraine are concerning. The person in charge doesn't understand what's happening, and this could lead to a global conflict. There's no valid reason for it. Many lives will be lost. Unlike others, I have firsthand experience as commander in chief and understand the players and the job. The neocons, globalists, warmongers, and race-baiters talk tough, but I know better.

Vladimir Putin's interference in our past election is a topic we don't discuss often. However, it is important to acknowledge that he has meddled in various ways, such as funding political parties, candidates, and bribing government officials in different countries. This is his modus operandi, as he despises democracy, particularly in the West, and holds a strong animosity towards us. Looking ahead to 2024, it is crucial to address this issue and have more conversations about it.

We will inform our colleagues about Russia's actions in the Baltics, Ukraine, and Georgia. We plan to make 2017 a year of offense against Putin, who we believe hacked our elections and is undermining democracy worldwide. We advocate for new sanctions targeting Putin personally, his energy and banking sectors. We just visited Ukraine, where we witnessed the impact of Russian interference. We will push for tougher sanctions on Russia for attacking the US through hacking, treating it as an act of war. We urge stronger sanctions on Russia for their attack on the US.

Our democracy is being threatened, and we must defend it. I taught at the University of Pennsylvania for 4 years.

We will fight for our homeland and push against Russian aggression. Our fight is not with the Russian people, but with Putin. We promise to take your calls to Washington, inform the American people of your bravery, and make the case against Putin to the world. We believe you will win and will provide what you need to succeed. The world is watching because we cannot allow Putin to succeed here, as it would set a dangerous precedent for other countries.

- The discussion begins with observations about Venezuela: the country has banned pornography, abortion, gay marriage, sex changes, and usury. The speaker notes that in Venezuela you don’t have credit cards with 40% interest. - Ben Shapiro’s response is referenced. Tucker Carlson is said to have argued that Maduro is culturally conservative. The speaker questions this framing, saying, “Who gives a shit? The guy's a communist dictator. Everyone in his country's eating dog. He's shipping fentanyl to The United States to kill Americans.” The speaker insists that the issue isn’t Maduro’s cultural stance but his overall dictatorship and the actions attributed to him. - The speaker emphasizes a personal stake: “Why do I give a shit whether he's anti LGBTQ rights? I do. I do. I'm not moving to Venezuela.” He states he is not pro-M Maduro but personally cares about Maduro’s stance on LGBT rights, citing concerns as a parent. - The speaker expresses a personal stance against abortion, describing it as unpopular but clear: “For sure, I'm against abortion.” He says he would personally become poorer to end abortion in the United States, even if that means sacrificing wealth, although he acknowledges that isn’t a choice most people can or would make. He notes that many people share this concern. - The speaker comments on pornography, saying he doesn’t think pornography is good and that it hurts people. - He also mentions beliefs about gender, stating he doesn’t think pretending that the sexes are the same is good. He references a claim he made earlier about not caring, followed by reiterating his concern, “I don’t give a shit,” in connection with Maduro’s positions. - The final point raised is Maduro’s stance on Israel, with the speaker indicating that Maduro is against Israel. - Throughout, the speaker contrasts personal, moral concerns (abortion, pornography, gender issues) with geopolitical considerations (Maduro’s dictatorship, drug trafficking, and attitudes toward Israel), asserting that the personal stakes—especially as a parent and as someone who would sacrifice wealth to end abortion—drive his emphasis on these issues.

This is about the security of our world and the United States of America.

We do not choose candidates in any country, but we help candidates in democracies present themselves effectively. We do not interfere in elections now. We support peaceful political protests in all countries.

In the CIA, democracy was secondary to cooperation. If a government was elected but did not align with our interests, democracy held no value. This perspective remains unchanged today.

Coming from Cuba, I understand the value of freedom after losing it there. In 1975, hearing Jimmy Carter campaign for president reminded me of Fidel Castro, leading me to believe he was a communist. This realization sparked my interest in politics.

I am concerned that Trump may be re-elected, which could harm the global order. Politicians create a false choice between patriotism and globalism.

Since day one, I have had a set of values that I believe in. I want to make the country stronger and fairer in a world that is constantly changing and worrying people. I always base my actions on truth and facts, aiming to free, protect, and unite.

I think the most important job we all have is at home, making sure our foreign policy supports the United States' interests. My sincere hope is that we can leave future generations a safer and better country and planet than what we inherited.

Jews dominate the government, we need non-Jewish leaders in control.

We will inform our colleagues about Russia's actions in the Baltics, Ukraine, and Georgia. We believe Putin hacked our elections and is undermining democracy worldwide. We advocate for new sanctions targeting Putin personally, as well as his energy and banking sectors. We must resist Putin's influence while supporting our allies. Our recent visit to Ukraine highlighted the consequences of Russian interference, which we also experienced in our own election. We will push for stronger sanctions against Russia, treating their hacking as an attack. We urge our colleagues to address their financial institutions and other aspects of their economy.

America is crucial for freedom, and I want to protect my children's American dream. I hope people hear my stories and wake up. I have no political agenda, just want a safe life for my family.