TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The Turkish media reported that Russian forces won the siege at Mariupol, except for a steel plant where Ukrainian soldiers and 50 French officers are trapped. The presence of French officers was kept secret due to the recent French elections. It is speculated that French officers may have fired missiles sinking the Russian flagship. NATO may have maintained control over these sensitive missiles.

Fighting continues with tanks, bombs, and guns, resulting in casualties.

We advise Americans in Moscow to avoid large gatherings for safety. Stay where you are and follow updates from the state department. In Ukraine, Russia initiated a significant attack today.

Armored vehicles and soldiers engaged in a violent conflict, causing casualties among civilians. The situation was intense, with people being hit and injured. The government's actions were met with fear and anger from the locals. Ukrainian forces took control of the central police station but faced hostility from the furious crowd. In an attempt to protect themselves, the soldiers fired shots above the crowd's heads, ultimately destroying the police station. This event signifies the town's determination to resist surrender. The toll has been heavy, with hundreds dead and many more injured. The once calm city is now filled with barricades and anger. James Mate reporting from Mariupol, Eastern Ukraine.

It's 9 AM on February 28th, 2022. Criminals with military weapons are causing chaos in Kyiv due to the Zelensky regime's distribution of arms. Shootings are not related to Russians but likely gang-related. The regime's actions are irresponsible and harmful to Ukrainian civilians. The speaker, in Ukraine, fears for their safety from armed criminals. The regime's actions will not deter Russians but will lead to civilian deaths. The speaker believes the regime is evil and harming the Ukrainian people.

Speaker 0: Every Russian missile brings terror as it claims over 30 lives in just one night. This war destroys infrastructure and today in Kherson, rescuers were harmed due to shelling.

Speaker 0: Russian rockets continue to cause fear and destruction. Over 30 lives were lost just last night. This is the reality of war. Today, in Kherson, rescue workers were injured due to shelling.

Zelensky claims Putin is terrified, but the situation is escalating dangerously. Russia has launched an intercontinental ballistic missile for the first time, raising concerns about nuclear capabilities. This development could drastically change the global landscape, driven by the military-industrial complex and financial support to Ukraine. The current U.S. administration's actions are seen as reckless, with media outlets celebrating the provision of long-range missiles to Ukraine. This conflict is viewed as a proxy war, and there is a strong call for negotiations to end the violence and find a resolution.

We're reporting live from Tel Aviv, where we're under attack by Hamas. We urgently need everyone to evacuate and run away from their homes. The situation is getting scary as people are being bombed. We spoke to a man named Kijo, who is witnessing the airstrikes firsthand. It's a devastating scene, with missiles dropping and lives at risk. We're trying to identify a body nearby, as someone's family has been killed by Hamas. This is a critical moment, and we're providing updates from the heart of the conflict in Tel Aviv.

Recent reports indicate that in Mariupol, where Russian forces have gained control, a significant steel plant remains under siege by Ukrainian soldiers. Notably, 50 French senior officers are reportedly trapped there, having been involved in directing the battle. This information was kept secret due to its potential impact on the recent French elections, which could have favored Marine Le Pen had the public known about the officers' perilous situation. Additionally, there are NATO officers present in Ukraine as advisors. Speculation arises that the Russian Black Sea Fleet's flagship, Moskva, was sunk by anti-ship missiles, possibly fired by the French, as these missiles are too sensitive for Ukrainian control and must remain under NATO oversight.

I'm back in Belgorod, where I previously witnessed the impact of conflict. Sadly, I'm here to report on the recent downing of a Russian transport plane carrying Ukrainian prisoners of war, leaving behind a scene of devastation. The local people are shocked, especially with the ongoing artillery sounds nearby. I spoke to a woman whose nephew is in hiding after being summoned to serve in the Ukrainian military, highlighting the human tragedy unfolding. Civilians here are bewildered by the targeting they face, with many casualties reported. The situation reflects a grim reality, as ordinary people suffer amid escalating tensions and violence. The targeting of civilians seems particularly pronounced, raising concerns about the motivations behind these actions. I’ll continue to provide updates from the ground in Belgorod.

It’s intense in Dimona right now. Look at this—there are smart bombs or drones being deployed. It’s chaotic out here, and it feels like it’s happening all around. The situation is overwhelming, with explosions in every direction. Under Israel's skies, it’s a surreal experience.

Ukrainian authorities attempted to target the separatist-held area but accidentally hit civilian areas, including a hospital and residential buildings. The attacks caused significant damage, with multiple floors and buildings being destroyed. The residents expressed their frustration and fear, as their homes were destroyed and their lives were put at risk. The Ukrainian army's actions were criticized for endangering innocent lives and lacking proper targeting.

Explosions were heard, possibly from a Patriot missile intercepting an incoming Scud missile. Air raid sirens are active, and there’s a sense of familiarity among people despite the early morning attack. Military regulations prevent showing specific missile locations. Observations include a vapor trail and a cloud suggesting an explosion. There are reports of firings in another Saudi city. The situation is tense, but an all-clear signal was given. Humor is briefly injected into the commentary, reflecting on the absurdity of the situation while maintaining a focus on safety. The reporter expresses relief at the all-clear but acknowledges the ongoing stress of the situation.

The Russians tried to avoid causing destruction in Ukraine during the conflict, hoping for a quick resolution. However, Ukrainian resistance was strong, escalating the situation. Russia controls the air but has not targeted critical infrastructure like trains, power plants, or government buildings in Kyiv. The speaker believes that the decision for peace or war lies with Washington, using Ukrainians as pawns in the conflict.

With the Russians entering, the situation has drastically changed. Many people are fleeing the city, and more will follow. People are seeking refuge in bomb shelters. This city is not like Iraq or Afghanistan, where conflict has been ongoing for years. It is a relatively civilized and European city, where such events are unexpected and undesired. Despite this, the people are not in denial.

Larry: Lavrov claimed Ukraine attempted to attack Putin’s official residence in Novgorod with around 91 long-range drones in December; allegedly all intercepted, no proof provided, no reported injuries or damage. Lavrov said retaliation is coming, targets for retaliatory strikes and timing had been set. Putin supposedly mentioned this on a call to Trump two days before the Zelensky meeting in Florida; Yuri, a Kremlin aide, said Putin was shocked and outraged, and that it would influence Washington’s approach to working with Zelensky. Russians claim Trump was relieved that no Tomahawk missiles were provided to Ukraine. No US confirmation; Trump described the meeting with Putin as very productive, and discussions included the temporary ceasefire not being an option. Budanov had suggested it wouldn’t be the first assassination attempt on Putin, but the most consequential due to timing. The question posed: who is the target—Ukraine, Zelensky, Budanov—or a Russian false flag to justify attacks and derail negotiations. Speaker 1: Timelines. The attack allegedly began the night of the 28th and continued into the 29th. The Russians say it was an attack on one of Putin’s residences, described as terrorism. Putin hasn’t lived at his residences for three years, using the Kremlin instead, but this is not the first Ukrainian attempt to target Putin; there was a proposed attack when he flew into Kursk by helicopter. Russians are upset that this attack had no military objective, only potential assassination, and they know Putin wasn’t there. The Russians view it as real and plan to respond; Lavrov indicated that negotiations would be reexamined. Budanov claims Ukrainian intelligence has targeted Putin multiple times; the attack timing coincides with Zelensky in Florida, suggesting possible rifts or risk of undermining negotiations. The possibility of Western (American or British) intelligence involvement is raised, with speculation about CIA influence or European intelligence, particularly Britain’s MI6, given its Ukrainian roots. The question remains whether the attack was staged to derail negotiations or a genuine strike. Larry: If Ukraine did this, why would they? Ukraine might want to eliminate an obstacle to peace, though that could backfire; some argue Putin is more restrained than any immediate successor. If 91 drones were launched, Western intelligence would likely be involved, possibly undermining Trump’s approach. There is a sense of mixed messages from U.S. intelligence, with individuals like Susan Miller pushing claims of Russian interference that contradict other narratives. Zelensky stated no territory would be ceded as part of negotiations; Russia’s position is that Crimea, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson, Donetsk, and Luhansk must be permanently part of the Russian Federation, elections must occur in Ukraine before negotiations, NATO must be out of Ukraine, and demilitarization is non-negotiable. Russia suggests there will be no 800,000-man army; these conditions are not open for negotiation. Russia may be willing to discuss numbers of troops for Ukraine, but not to concede core territorial goals. Speaker 0: If CIA or other elements were behind this, could it be to undermine Trump or push for a peace deal by pressuring Putin? Putin showed up in uniform with the military leadership, signaling a hard stance on land/territory, stating that negotiations should proceed without ceasing. Some argue this would trigger a stronger Russian push, while others see this as undermining Trump’s efforts. Trump and Zelensky had discussed a peace plan with 90-95% agreement, with a few thorny issues, possibly territorial. Trump characterized their call as productive; Russia reportedly agreed to support Ukraine postwar with discounted energy and resources. Lavrov’s rapid response to the attack and the potential retaliation would affect ongoing negotiations, which some view as already derailed due to Ukraine’s intransigence on concessions. Speaker 1: Could European intelligence be involved? Britain’s MI6 is seen as critical; there is a suggestion that British intelligence could have acted without American consultation. This would strain relations with Trump, especially after new security strategy. The transcript also notes a broader shift in Western posture: some European leaders are pushing for stronger defense and a more independent European stance, which might influence the dynamic around negotiations and intelligence actions. Speaker 0: Zelensky’s Christmas remark, “may he perish,” followed by an attack on Putin’s residence, prompts questions about who’s pulling Zelensky’s strings. Zelensky is described as the “highest paid actor in the world” with large sums allegedly pilfered from Ukraine’s aid; Zelensky could be expendable to those steering Ukraine’s direction. The meeting in Mar-a-Lago between Zelensky, Trump, and others occurred while the Putin residence attack was underway, suggesting an attempt to undermine negotiations. Budanov’s connection to the CIA and potential independent actions by Ukrainian intelligence raise further concerns about internal Ukrainian divisions. Speaker 1: Russia’s potential retaliation could target Ukrainian intelligence assets like the SBU headquarters in Kyiv, or European assets inside Ukraine if evidence points to Western involvement. Russia’s current military actions include continuing strikes on power infrastructure, with movements in Zaporizhzhia and around Kherson, indicating an axis of attack. Independently, Russia claims significant ground progress; Ukraine counters with claims of selective advances by Russia and a favorable propaganda edge for Ukraine. The battlefield metrics show Russia increasing manpower and maintaining multiple axes of attack, with eight or more fronts, while Ukrainian recoveries of bodies show a ratio suggesting heavy Ukrainian losses. Speaker 0: The conversation ends with expectations for retaliation, possible new European involvement, and the enduring fear that negotiations remain unsettled. The next days could reveal more about who is behind the attack, how Russia responds, and whether a path to peace remains possible, given the conflicting narratives and competing strategic interests.

Russia has launched a significant attack on Ukraine, targeting its energy infrastructure and leaving over a million people without electricity. Ukraine reported that Russia fired over 100 drones and 90 missiles in this assault. President Zelensky condemned the attack as a vile escalation of Russia's tactics. This escalation follows Ukraine's recent strikes on Russian territory using NATO-supplied long-range missiles. In response, Ukraine claims to have targeted an oil depot near Moscow, though it remains unclear if these strikes were successful, as Russia has not confirmed any hits and interception is likely. The situation continues to develop with ongoing hostilities between the two nations.

There is chaos and confusion as people stand still, unsure of what is happening. Shots have been fired, but the details are unknown. Metro officials at the airport are still gathering information, but there are reports of multiple injuries. The entire area has been shut down, and people are being advised to stay away. The source of the shots seems to be from above, causing the speaker to leave the scene.

The Russian army has launched missile strikes across Ukraine, targeting military facilities and railway junctions. In the Kharkov region, Russian troops have gained control of key settlements, tightening their grip around Pokrovsk. Trump has shifted his stance on the Ukraine conflict, suggesting he is ready to meet with Putin and indicating potential new sanctions against Russia if negotiations fail. He criticized Biden's handling of the situation and emphasized the need for European nations to contribute more financially. Meanwhile, a Colombian citizen fighting for Ukraine was captured in Russia, claiming he was misled about his role. Zelensky has not signed a bill to halt the mobilization of young men, indicating ongoing recruitment efforts. European leaders express concern over Trump's influence and the potential for a prolonged conflict, while Zelensky calls for increased military support from the U.S. and Europe.

At least 59 people were killed and 149 wounded in ongoing fierce fighting across the country. Russian forces have taken control of Chernobyl and Russian paratroopers briefly occupied an airfield near Kyiv.

The discussion centers on the rapidly evolving geopolitical landscape, with a focus on Venezuela, Iran, and the broader US-led strategic environment, as seen through the perspectives of Mario and Pepe Escobar. Venezuela and the Venezuelan crisis - Escobar frames Venezuela as a desperate move tied to the demise of the petrodollar, with a broader matrix of actors maneuvering in the back to profit from a potential annexation and to test regional security strategies. He notes that the United States has stated “this is my backyard, and I own it,” and questions whether Washington is ready to back that stance against the will of the Venezuelan people, including Chavistas and the new government led by Delcy Rodríguez, who he describes as “an old school Chavista” with a strong legal and negotiation background. - He argues that the operation against Maduro lacked a coherent strategy, including planning for reorganizing the Venezuelan oil sector to serve American interests. He cites expert opinion suggesting it would take five years to recondition Venezuela’s energy ecosystem to produce around 3,000,000 barrels per day, requiring about $183 billion in investment, which CEOs would require guarantees for before engaging. - The regime-change objective as pursued by Trump-era policy did not materialize; the core regime persists with figures like Padrino and Cabello still in place. The “mini Netflix special” of the operation did not translate into a durable political outcome, and the regime’s leadership remains, even as some key security figures were demoted or accused in the operation. - Dulce Rodríguez (Delcy), the vice president, is portrayed as a capable negotiator who must persuade the Venezuelan public that the security betrayal by the head of Maduro’s security apparatus was real. Escobar emphasizes that the domestic narrative faces a hard sell because the core regime remains and the security apparatus has not been fully neutralized. - Escobar stresses that sanctions are the most critical barrier to Venezuela’s economic recovery and argues that without sanctions relief, meaningful economic reconstitution is unlikely. He notes that Delcy Rodríguez enjoys broad popular support, and he argues that Latin American sentiment toward U.S. intervention complicates Washington’s position. - He warns Brazil’s Lula, a BRICS member, plays a crucial role; Brazilian foreign policy, influenced by Atlanticists, could veto Venezuela’s BRICS membership, complicating Venezuela’s regional integration. He contends that Maduro’s removal is not assured, and a more open Venezuelan regime under Delcy could potentially collaborate with the West, but sanctions and governance challenges remain central obstacles. Iran, protests, and sanctions - The Iranian protests are framed as economically driven, with inflation and cost-of-living pressures fueling dissent. Iran’s currency and real inflation are cited as severe stressors, and the regime’s subsidy policies are criticized as inadequate. Escobar emphasizes that the protests are hijacked by foreign actors to turn into a regime-change playbook, echoing familiar color-revolution patterns observed in other contexts. - He describes Iran’s resilience under extensive sanctions, highlighting infrastructure deficits and the broader economic stagnation as long-running issues. He stresses that Iranian society contains grassroots debate and a robust intellectual culture, including Shiite theology studies, universities, and a tradition of long-term strategic thinking with sustained cross-border alliances (Russia and China) as part of a broader BRICS alignment. - On foreign involvement, Escobar notes differing perspectives: some Iranians blame foreign meddling, while others point to domestic mismanagement and sanctions as primary drivers of discontent. He emphasizes that Iran’s leadership remains wary of external coercion and seeks to strengthen ties within BRICS and other partners, while being cautious about provoking Western escalation. Russia, China, and the evolving great-power dynamic - Escobar argues that Moscow, Beijing, and Tehran view US actions as part of a broader long-term strategy rather than short-term wins. He describes a sophisticated, long-horizon approach: China pursuing a multi-decade plan with five-year cycles, Russia testing BRICS-centered financial and payment systems to reduce dependence on SWIFT, and Iran leveraging BRICS relationships to counterbalance Western pressure. - He contrasts this with what he calls the “bordello circus” of American political-military maneuvering, suggesting that the US’s episodic threats and unpredictable diplomacy undermine any similar credibility or effectiveness. He emphasizes that Russia and China prioritize acts and long-term power balancing over American-style unpredictability. - The 12-day war and the Orishnik missile attack on Lviv are framed as signaling a more volatile phase in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, with Putin signaling that the war could extend beyond the previously imagined timelines if Western escalation continues. The missile strike is presented as a clear warning to NATO and the Polish border region, underscoring heightened geopolitical risk. The broader outlook and conclusions - Escobar remains deeply pessimistic about a swift resolution to the Russia-Ukraine war, citing the potential for a prolonged European conflict that could strain European economies. He views regime stability in Iran as fragile but enduring, while Venezuela’s path remains contingent on sanctions relief, domestic governance, and the strategic posture of Latin American neighbors and BRICS members. - The conversation closes with a reminder of the complexity of modern geopolitics, where sanctions, domestic economics, regional alignments, and long-term strategic planning interact in ways that defy simple “winner-loser” narratives.

More clashes in Ukraine's capital, Kyiv, as it turns into a war zone. Questions of credibility arise after a leaked chat between top US diplomats discussing restructuring the Ukrainian government. The US government has a history of wanting regime change in various countries, and they have allies in the media and government to control the narrative. NATO has expanded into 13 countries, leading to concerns about the start of Cold War 2.0.

Armored vehicles were present, and a soldier fired a rocket propelled grenade. People, including civilians, were hit. A man was carried away in a car, and another was wounded nearby. A bullet passed overhead. Locals said, "Our government killing us," and described it as "very scary." Infantry fighting vehicles left the city at high speed. Ukrainian forces controlled the central police station but were jeered by locals. Soldiers opened fire above the crowd's heads as they retreated. Ukrainian forces left, making the point that Mariupol will not be surrendered without a fight. Reports indicate 820 deaths and many more wounded. The city is seething with anger, with barricades being erected. Young men were seen on an abandoned armored vehicle.