TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Okay. It's Saturday, and Marjorie and I decide to have fun: go shoot ghosts. We'll call it Saturday Shoot Saturday: Bullets and barbecue. We have our eyes, our ears on protection. Very important. We wrapped up shooting and were practicing for real-life scenarios. Yes, you always have to be ready. It's very important especially for a woman to be able to defend yourself and that's what the second amendment is all about. So ladies, don't be afraid to buy a gun, train with the gun and learn to defend yourself. I'm more familiar with the pistol than I am the AR. The AR is my favorite because you wanna know something? I don't wanna run out of bullets. If someone's coming in my house to kill me, I am definitely going to do some redecorating. We'll be right back.

While reviewing a long video, the speaker points to the moment: "it shoots right down at a very downward angle at the back right side of his head." He identifies the device: "This part right here would be the handle, and this part right here ejects the casing after the shot is fired. Alright? And this part right here is the barrel." He adds, "the middle part I believe is a video camera." He notes, "the only gun that swivels and does the tip like that, it is called an Israeli corner shot. You should look them up." He also says, "The remote triggered, and they had video attached to them. And it could be set off from a phone and a detonator. The signal from the phone and the detonator."

The speaker discusses the impact of a 20-pound baby on a horse, noting how the baby rapidly changes. They mention previous conversations about this topic and express a desire for the listener to experience it. The speaker references a powerful gun, possibly an AR 15, in relation to the situation.

On this episode the speaker explains that 'It takes two different tools to take it apart. It takes a Torx key and an Allen key.' After taking a shot, he outlines the steps: 'remove the bolt, remove the magazine, grab my Allen key, hit the two bolts on the bottom, put those away,' then 'grab my Torx key, remove the scope, put everything in the backpack, make sure I have everything, and make my way downtown.' He argues that 'his fine tuned motor function' and an 'extreme elevated heart rate' from adrenaline would make these actions difficult, noting 'we're not even gonna touch the topic of him assembling the rifle on top of the roof' with concerns about accuracy if reassembled. Regarding transport, he states 'the barrel broken down does not fit in this backpack' and 'the rifle stock... doesn't fit. It sticks out.' Even if placed in pants, 'these are still so long broken down that he would not be able to walk straight.'

Speaker 0 expresses frustration with how podcasts interview figures like Jack Posobiac, Benny Johnson, Andrew Colvord, and Turning Point USA, accusing them of feeding narratives and avoiding obvious questions. He mentions wanting CCTV footage and Turning Point material, and challenges the idea that someone could be shot in the neck with a 30-06 from 150 yards. He references the “magic man of steel” and questions the official narrative around Charlie Kirk’s filming or assassination, calling out perceived manipulation by right-wing media and “controlled opposition.” He urges viewers to follow Intel Skiff, praising him for uncovering information, and asserts that the 30-06 could not have left an exit wound consistent with a neck wound in Charlie Kirk’s case. He insists supporters seek the truth and accuses media figures of fabrication. Speaker 1 then describes a physical test designed to test the claims. He lists the ammunition: an 80-grain ELDX for 22 Creedmoor, a 178-grain ELDX for 30-06, and a 150-grain FMJ for 30-06. The setup includes a pork shoulder about four-and-a-half inches thick taped to a steel plate, with two-liter bottles positioned behind the steel. The test is conducted at 150 yards. They record shots with the 30-06 and then the 22 Creedmoor, intending that if the 22 Creedmoor fails to produce a negative wound, there would be a negative wound from the 30-06. For the 178-grain 30-06 ELDX: the pork shoulder is described as completely ripped through, with the neck represented by the pork shoulder, and the steel plate also being penetrated, followed by an exit wound on the two-liter bottle. They assert the 30-06 blew straight through the neck/shoulder mock, through the steel, and through the Coke bottle behind it, demonstrating a complete through-and-through. They emphasize that the evidence shows the steel plate and two-liter bottle sustained exit wounds, supporting their narrative that a 30-06 at 150 yards would penetrate in this setup. For the 150-grain FMJ 30-06: they report it went through the mock neck and through the steel, with an exit wound observed on the two-liter, again indicating a through-and-through. They then switch to the 22 Creedmoor: the shooter’s wife fires the 22 Creedmoor from the same elevated position. The 22 Creedmoor is described as smaller with less energy than the 30-06, yet it completely penetrates the neck mock and the steel, with an exit on the two-liter bottle. The testers point out that the 22 Creedmoor, in this setup, penetrated both the neck-mock and steel at 150 yards, undermining the claim that a 30-06 would be stopped by a neck at that distance. The overall takeaway, according to Speaker 1, is that both the neck mock and steel behind it were penetrated by the 22 Creedmoor, and that the 30-06 would likewise penetrate in this configuration, challenging the notion that the official narrative about Charlie Kirk’s injury could be accurate. The video underscores the comparison between the two calibers and highlights the steel plate as a decisive barrier in the demonstration.

The speaker states a theory that "never fits quite right," questioning how to elicit laughter if something isn't perfect. The speaker identifies a Beretta A400 shotgun, purchased for trap shooting due to its recoil reduction system ("kickoff"), which minimizes shoulder pain, especially beneficial for older individuals.

The speaker is at a shooting range where Crooks practiced, with targets at 50, 100, and almost 200 yards. The FBI has footage from cameras that recorded Crooks and his license plate, as registration to shoot at the club is organized. The club's owners and management are cooperating with the investigation. The speaker learned firsthand that Crooks was quiet and didn't participate in group events. Shooters would sit at benches and shoot right-handed on this range. The speaker states they are going to get to the bottom of everything.

On this episode of you might be a dumb motherfucker, this is my rifle. It takes two different tools to take it apart. It takes a Torx key and an Allen key. Now if I take a shot and immediately disassemble this, I have to remove the bolt, remove the magazine, grab my Allen key, hit the two bolts on the bottom, put those away in the Allen key, grab my Torx key, remove the scope, put everything in the backpack, make sure I have everything, and make my way downtown. Which is gonna take a lot longer for him than it is for me, especially because his fine tuned motor function, something as simple as grabbing an Allen key to a little bolt is gonna be extremely impaired due to a dump of adrenaline throughout his bloodstream.

A man in Colorado Springs was shot seven times in the back with an AR-15. He is unable to post pictures due to evidence, but he can share a video. Researchers at Wayne State University study the impact of bullets on human tissue using gelatin blocks. Handgun rounds create a relatively straight line through the tissue, while rounds from an AR-15 cause an explosion inside the body. The man who was shot is recovering and grateful that none of his vital organs were hit. He believes that stricter gun laws could help prevent such incidents in the future.

Discusses a toy gun that "may not look like a real one, but it functions like a real one" and could be "a good educational tool to teach a child about firearm safety." It teaches to "clear a chamber, how to carefully handle one, where to point it, where not to point it." Features include: "It'll hold six rounds." "It fires the little bullet and the casing ejects." "Mag release for rapid reload." "Front and rear sights." "The slide locks back after the last round." "This little red bullet fires out of the barrel, to reload it, you just push it in." "It even has a Picatinny rail." "So you can mount your laser or your tactical light." "It's a toy that can be on the good side of the force, but it depends on how you use it." "Should this be for sale?"

We will be shooting a Soviet Maxon model 1910 machine gun chambered in 762 by 54 on a Sokolov mount. Our young defender will demonstrate it at the range.

The speaker discusses the use of a device described as "less than lethal" and emphasizes that it is not nonlethal. He states, "Less than lethal. It's not nonlethal. It's less than lethal," and adds that it is still risky because if it hits him in the eye, it could take out an eye. He asserts that he can shoot the person in the face if he has to, saying, "So I can shoot him in the face if I have to." The speaker then references Sandy, saying that’s when she heard him talk about shooting somebody in the face, and identifies the target by saying, "It was that motherfucker right there."

Guns are a controversial topic, with some arguing that they only lead to violence. However, it is important to understand them to have informed discussions. There are different types of guns, and some people believe that certain ones are scarier and more dangerous than others based on their appearance. It is also claimed that cities with strict gun control policies have higher gun crime rates due to criminals crossing state lines. The United States has a high rate of mass shooting deaths compared to other Western countries, but it ranks 64th out of 97 countries in terms of per capita frequency. There is a debate about the impact of video games on gun violence. Some studies suggest that the US has the highest gun violence rates, but the data supporting these findings is not readily available. Different gun accessories, like stabilizing braces and ghost guns, are also discussed. The video concludes by urging viewers to ban guns and trust lawmakers with a certain political affiliation.

That was incredible! Here we have a 4570 with a 12-inch barrel, and it's suppressed. The sound is barely noticeable; it's almost silent. It's hard to believe how quiet it is.

I was a scout sniper in the Marine Corps and later taught in the Army's special operations target interdiction course. I also instructed in the Marine Corps urban sniper course as a contractor. We discuss ballistic trajectories, calculations, and calibers. The sound of a gunshot is familiar to me, likely a 300 blackout. When rainbows appear, people can climb and freeze.

Former action guy emphasizes the importance of training for combat situations. He demonstrates how everyday household items can be used as weapons and showcases his custom-made Carbine underbarrel mount brace. He humorously highlights the need to always be prepared for threats, even in unlikely scenarios like a shark attack at the pool. He mentions the significance of staying updated on training and tactics by watching GunTubers. The speaker also touches on the importance of looking cool on social media and maintaining good health. He concludes by showcasing his versatile mounting system and jokingly thanks the viewers for watching.

The speaker was a sniper and assaulter in an elite counterterrorism unit after being a scout sniper in the Marine Corps. They graduated from the marine scout sniper school, urban sniper school, and did special operations. The speaker taught level one and level two SODICs, which is the special operations target interdiction force sniper school. They also taught the Marine Corps urban sniper course as a contractor. The discussion will cover ballistic trajectories, crack thump calculations, muzzle velocity, and calibers. The speaker identifies a sound in a clip as likely being a 300 blackout.

Gary Melton (Gary) and Mitch have a lengthy, meandering exchange that centers on veterans’ histories, alleged government manipulation, personal trauma, and the pursuit of truth around high-profile political cases. The core thread is an effort to verify Mitch’s claims about his SF background and to explore broader claims about political interference, media narratives, and potential conspiracies. Key points and exchanges: - Identity, background, and verification: - Gary identifies himself as a former SF soldier seeking to verify Mitch’s SF history after seeing his Candace Owens interview. - Mitch provides his SF timeline: he was in group from February/March 1993 until November 1996; MOS 18 Charlie (medic). He mentions attending the 300F1 course and a severe on-duty accident at Guadalupe River, involving a 60-foot fall that caused multiple injuries (spine, feet, knee, lumbar, dislocations, torn labrum, etc.). - Mitch describes his treatment (brace, three-week leave, then recycled into the next class and internship at Brookhaven Army Medical Center Burn Ward). He mentions ODA +1 63166/ +1 63/ +1 66 and places himself on +183 and +185 in the old numbering system; later, he notes the transition to the newer numeric system circa 2002-2006. - Gary asks for Mitch’s DD214 to verify the story; Mitch agrees and offers to share it. He references being in “Lake Baja” and knowing Nate (Nate Chapman), whom he spoke with the day before. - Personal stakes, trauma, and family: - Mitch explains a long, difficult divorce and custody battle that spanned many years. He says he was a stay-at-home dad for his son, who is now 13, and describes persistent, aggressive accusations against him (PTSD, abuse, murder) by courts and media figures. - He recounts a prior incident involving a coworker or classmate, Jimmy Walker, and notes that Walker later claimed PTSD and discrimination in SF contexts. Mitch frames this as part of broader patterns of how SF status can be weaponized in custody and legal battles. - Mitch and Gary discuss how the SF environment can foster suspicion, paranoia, and intra-community politics (e.g., clashes with SF Brothers, admin actions, and the difficulty of maintaining contact with peers after leaving the teams). - Candace Owens, TPUSA, and broader conspiratorial discussions: - The callers discuss Candace Owens’ involvement, the TPUSA circle, and the believability of various claims. Mitch says he has wanted to vet the claims through Candace and Joe Kent, and he’s offered to supply documents to verify stories. He notes that Candace has reportedly pulled threads about various shooters and narratives and that this has caused friction with TPUSA. - Mitch argues that Candace might be exploited by political or foreign adversaries and that her narratives sometimes lack corroborating evidence, distracting from “the truth.” He insists on corroborating Mitch’s own story with documents (DD214, other records) before airing anything publicly. - Gary responds with skepticism about online personas but agrees to vet Mitch’s materials, emphasizing integrity and a desire to verify truth. Both acknowledge the risk of backend manipulation, bot attacks, and the use of media figures to push narratives. - Ballistics and the Charlie Kirk incident: - A substantial portion of the discussion turns to ballistics surrounding Tyler Robinson and the Charlie Kirk incident. Mitch (the ballistics expert) explains that many variables affect ballistic outcomes (ammo type, grain, bullet construction, handloads vs. factory ammo, barrel condition, yaw, stabilization). He argues that the 30-06 round’s behavior can be highly variable and that an “atypical” (non-normative) wound could occur for many reasons. - He compares Martin Luther King’s assassination (65-yard shot, 30-06, open casket) to Charlie Kirk’s wound, noting similarities in the trajectory and lack of an exit wound in some high-profile cases. He cites Chuck Ritter (Green Beret) who was shot multiple times with 7.62x54R and survived, and uses these examples to illustrate the complexity of interpreting ballistic evidence. - Mitch asserts that multiple plausible explanations exist for Kirk’s wounds and stresses that the exact ammunition type, projectile, and ballistic conditions are unknown at present. He emphasizes that investigators possess DNA and surveillance records (DNA on the firearm, trigger, cartridge, towel used by Tyler Robinson) and text messages; he notes that Mitch is not claiming to know the entire truth but wants to see corroborating evidence. - The two discuss the possibility of government involvement or manipulation, while acknowledging that ballistics alone cannot prove a broader conspiracy. They note the challenges of obtaining complete ballistic data before trials, and they express openness to future verification once more information becomes available (e.g., during trial proceedings). - Custody, investigations, and accountability: - Mitch recounts the broader pattern of SF members being targeted by legal systems when in contentious custody situations, with accusations and judgments influenced by SF status. He cites examples of coercion, character assassination, and the weaponization of families in court battles. - They discuss how the FBI and other agencies have handled high-profile cases, noting distrust in narratives presented by authorities and media. They acknowledge that public transparency is essential, even as prosecutions proceed. - Platform, vetting, and next steps: - The two plan to continue the vetting process: Mitch will provide DD214 and related documents to Gary, who promises to verify and not disclose sensitive information without Mitch’s consent. They discuss sending further documents via email or text (Gary’s Paramount Tactical contact). - Mitch expresses a desire to appear on Gary’s show and to connect with Nate (Nate Chapman) for collaborative vetting. Gary commits to facilitating, offering to act as an advocate if Mitch’s story is verified and to help set up communications with Nate and Candace as appropriate. - The conversation closes with both agreeing on the importance of truth, corroboration, and accountability. They acknowledge the risk and the emotional toll of revealing sensitive histories but emphasize their commitment to pursuing the truth and preventing misinformation or manipulation. Overall, the transcript captures a tense, exploratory exchange between two veterans and affiliates about verifying SF credentials, the personal toll of custody and legal battles, the influence of political narratives, and the complexities of ballistics and forensics in high-profile incidents. The participants stress verification through documents, corroboration of anecdotes, and cautious, integrity-driven engagement with media figures and audiences.

Humanity lived in peace for centuries until the invention of firearms, which led to violence and destruction. Guns, like the scoped semi-auto revolver that killed Abraham Lincoln, have changed history. The AR-15, often considered a fearsome weapon, is heavy and equipped with various attachments. Demonstrating these weapons reveals their destructive capabilities, such as decapitating targets. The impact of firing guns can lead to severe psychological effects, including PTSD. The fear associated with guns can be overwhelming, and there's a call to reconsider their ownership. Ultimately, the message suggests that giving up firearms could lead to better governance and safety.

The speaker was asked about a statement where they said they carried weapons in war despite never deploying to a war zone. The speaker responded that they are proud of their 24 years of service and their record speaks for itself. They speak candidly and passionately, especially about children being shot in schools. When asked if they misspoke about being in war, the speaker said the conversation was about carrying weapons of war after a school shooting, and their grammar isn't always correct. The speaker stated they will never demean another member's service.

The speaker references Rob O’Neill and “the other dozens of high level firearms experts” who have created content on this topic, stating that all of them have done range testing, including the speaker who personally tested with 30-06 rounds. He describes conducting a ballistics test using a variety of targets: sheep bone, cow vertebrae, cow femurs, cow femurs wrapped in 10 inches of meat, and even literal half-inch steel. He notes that ten other creators have also performed tests, and asserts that in 100% of the ballistics testing done so far, the 30-06 has blown straight through everything tested. He asks listeners to consider a specific question: why is there no video from Matt Tardio recreating the FBI narrative shot, and why doesn’t that video exist? He challenges others to take their gun to the range and replicate the test, insisting that they can obtain a 100% realistic ballistic human anatomy head set at 139 yards with a nine-degree slope and a nine-degree offset to replicate the shot, and to show the results. The speaker then recounts his own testing process and results. He says he took his time at the range with his guns to see if he could produce results that would match the narrative he’s questioning, and he says his testing showed certain outcomes. He then cites specific demonstrations from his range work: first, the cow neck vertebrae “ exploded.” He then mentions cow femurs, describing them as gigantic and “a 100 times stronger than a human neck,” explaining why the discussion is focusing on the neck region. He continues with another example and states, “That’s why we’re hitting next.” He attempts to review the results again, saying, “Maybe I didn’t. Here we go. I’m going back.” He concludes with an observation: “Oh, look. It exploded. Went right through. Maybe I did, miss.”

I have a variety of firearms with me today. I have my trusty 38 special revolver, a 12 gauge shotgun for loud and wild shooting, a Smith and Wesson 500 for attention, a 1911 for superior theology, a Glock for perfection, a Walther p k 380 for German technology, and a pistol caliber carbine for the best of both worlds. I like to have one foot in both camps.

The video discusses the shooting of Charlie and examines the official narrative. The host notes that the official story is a sniper on a roof at roughly 130–140 yards, using a 30-06 bolt-action rifle, with ammunition that impacted Charlie’s neck and left no exit wound. He mentions that conservative media outlets have asked him whether this is plausible, and that Alex Jones reported TP USA sources claiming the bullet entered Charlie’s back at a downward angle and stayed there. Key points about the 30-06 are explained for context. The caliber was the US military standard in World War I and II, making it an older design. A comparison is shown with a 5.56 and a 0.308 projectile to illustrate size: the 30-06 bullet appears large, but ballistically it is very similar to the 0.308 due to powder improvements over time. The host emphasizes that many people now have experience with 0.308, so his discussion centers on terminal performance in soft tissue rather than cartridge shape alone. Several ballistic factors are highlighted. Bullets for 30-06 in 2025 vary widely in weight, typically 150–180 grains, with some as light as 110 grains and up to 200+ grains. Lighter, longer bullets can have higher ballistic coefficients, meaning they travel through air with less resistance and are very stable in flight, but they destabilize more quickly in soft tissue. He notes that higher ballistic coefficient projectiles may behave differently upon impact, potentially increasing the likelihood of atypical behavior upon penetrating flesh. However, the exact projectile type (full metal jacket, open-tip match, soft point, etc.) is unknown, and the FBI has released no information about the actual projectile. Regarding the probability of the reported scenario (a downward-angle hit with a 30-06 leaving no exit wound), the host estimates the odds as very small but not impossible. He provides a rough quantified sense: if this scenario happened a thousand times under the same conditions, it might occur one or two times. He stresses that it’s very unlikely that such a powerful round would leave no exit wound, but not impossible. He notes he has seen angles from different views suggesting no exit wound. He proposes that if the FBI and law enforcement want public confidence in the story, more information should be released. For example, if the bullet stayed in the upper torso, one would expect to see a temporary cavity forming as the bullet penetrates, and such cavitation would be evident in an autopsy; no autopsy details have been released in his view. He reiterates that the official account is highly improbable based on his experience with ballistics, armor, gel, and animals, but not proven impossible. The host invites questions in the comments and on his social media, asks viewers to say a prayer for Charlie and his family, and closes the video.

Americans have advanced weaponry for gunfights, including a shoulderable sidearm with speed and accuracy. It can carry over 40 rounds, is lighter than a 1911, and has a 6-inch barrel. The speaker encourages Americans to own one for self-defense. The video ends with a discount code for viewers.