reSee.it - Related Video Feed

California has become a focal point of discussion due to a significant exodus of residents, with many considering themselves political refugees. Michael Shellenberger, a former public relations professional and author, discusses the dire state of California, particularly regarding homelessness, addiction, and the political landscape. He ran for governor in 2018 against Gavin Newsom, motivated by a desire to address these pressing issues. Shellenberger highlights that homelessness in California is largely driven by untreated mental illness and addiction rather than poverty. He shares personal experiences and observations of the devastating conditions faced by homeless individuals, emphasizing the need for medical care and rehabilitation. He criticizes the state's approach, which he believes enables addiction through a victimhood ideology that discourages personal responsibility and recovery. The conversation also touches on the political dynamics in California, where progressive policies have led to increased crime rates and a lack of accountability for criminal behavior. Shellenberger notes that many Californians are frustrated with the current leadership and the failure to enforce laws, leading to a decline in public safety and quality of life. He argues that a shift in approach is necessary, advocating for a system that combines compassion with accountability, including the enforcement of laws against public drug use and homelessness. Shellenberger believes that California's issues reflect broader societal challenges, including a crisis of values and a need for reform in how addiction and mental health are addressed. He calls for a return to a pro-human agenda that emphasizes law and order, personal responsibility, and the importance of community support in overcoming adversity.

Michael Shellenberger discusses his candidacy for governor of California on the Joe Rogan podcast, emphasizing his focus on addressing homelessness, drug addiction, and crime. He critiques the current approach, particularly the concept of "housing first," which he argues has led to a worsening situation by allowing individuals to camp in public spaces without requiring them to seek treatment or rehabilitation. He highlights the need for a centralized psychiatric and addiction care system, which he calls Cal Psych, to provide effective support for those struggling with addiction and mental health issues. Shellenberger reveals that he has reported on the existence of supervised drug use sites in San Francisco, where individuals use drugs under supervision, and criticizes the progressive ideology that promotes "radical compassion" without addressing the harms of addiction. He believes that many homeless individuals are not just victims of circumstance but are often struggling with addiction and mental illness, and he advocates for a more structured approach to rehabilitation that includes accountability and support. He contrasts California's situation with that of other countries, such as the Netherlands, which have successfully managed their homeless populations through comprehensive care and support systems. Shellenberger argues that California has the resources to tackle its homelessness crisis effectively but has been mismanaging funds, leading to a counterproductive cycle of spending that does not yield positive outcomes. Throughout the conversation, he emphasizes the importance of personal responsibility, the need for effective leadership, and the necessity of reforming the state's approach to social issues. He expresses optimism about his campaign and the potential for change, asserting that he can bring a fresh perspective to governance that prioritizes practical solutions over ideological dogma.

Dr. Nora Volkow, director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), discusses her personal connection to addiction, stemming from family losses due to substance abuse. She shares her early fascination with science, encouraged by her father, a scientist with a complex family history linked to Leon Trotsky, which instilled a sense of responsibility to address social injustices, including addiction. Volkow highlights the current state of the addiction crisis in the U.S., emphasizing the rise of overdose deaths, particularly due to fentanyl, a potent synthetic opioid. She explains how the opioid epidemic began with over-prescription and evolved into widespread heroin use, culminating in the dangerous proliferation of fentanyl-laced drugs. Volkow criticizes the war on drugs for perpetuating structural racism and failing to reduce drug use or its consequences, advocating for a shift towards harm reduction strategies. She discusses innovative approaches to treating addiction, including the potential of psychedelics like psilocybin for conditions such as depression and substance use disorders. While acknowledging the promising preliminary data, she stresses the need for rigorous research to understand the mechanisms and ensure safe application. Volkow also introduces transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and low-intensity ultrasound as emerging technologies for treating addiction, expressing optimism about their potential to create lasting changes in brain function. Finally, she emphasizes the importance of addressing comorbid psychiatric disorders and the impact of social determinants of health on addiction, advocating for equitable access to treatment options. Volkow concludes with a hopeful outlook on the future of addiction treatment, driven by scientific innovation and a deeper understanding of the complexities of addiction.

The podcast opens with Tucker Carlson expressing alarm over a potential US regime change war in Venezuela, citing a naval armada steaming towards the oil-rich nation to force out Nicolas Maduro. He questions the stated justifications—democracy, oil, or drugs—by highlighting the US's poor track record with regime change, which often leads to unintended consequences like mass migration and societal collapse, as seen in Europe after the Syrian civil war. Carlson points out Venezuela's socially conservative policies, contrasting them with the US-backed opposition's progressive agenda, and dismisses the idea that the intervention is about promoting democracy or securing oil, given that American companies are currently sanctioned from operating there. He also challenges the notion that Venezuela is a primary source of drugs in the US, noting that fentanyl and meth largely originate from Mexico. Carlson and guest Colonel Douglas MacGregor argue that US foreign policy is often driven by powerful, wealthy interests rather than genuine national security or public welfare. MacGregor suggests the Venezuela intervention is perceived by some as "flipping the chessboard" on Russia and China, despite these nations having little interest in militarily defending Venezuela. Both hosts lament the disconnect between Washington's focus on distant conflicts and the escalating domestic crises. The discussion pivots sharply to the severe drug problem within the United States, exemplified by graphic descriptions and videos of urban decay in cities like Portland and Philadelphia, where fentanyl and xylazine addiction are rampant. Carlson criticizes government-funded NGOs for exacerbating the crisis through "harm reduction" policies like distributing clean needles and pipes, and "housing first" initiatives that allow drug use in taxpayer-funded facilities. Former addict Ginny Burton corroborates this, explaining how these policies enable addiction, create a "dependency-creating industry," and make recovery nearly impossible by removing accountability and providing "poisons" instead of genuine help. She advocates for sobriety-focused treatment and accountability, arguing that domestic issues should take precedence over foreign interventions. The hosts conclude by emphasizing that the US drug crisis has killed more Americans than all wars combined in the last century, yet politicians like Lindsey Graham prioritize foreign conflicts over addressing the visible destruction in American cities. They suggest that the true problems are internal—lack of law enforcement, failed social policies, and a government seemingly uninterested in its own citizens' well-being. The podcast ends with a call for a new 9/11 commission, alleging foreknowledge of the attacks and a cover-up.

Dave Rubin announces a shift of the Friday Roundtable to Thursdays, welcoming guests John Cardillo and Spencer Claven. They discuss President Biden's apparent cognitive decline, suggesting that his inability to read a teleprompter reflects broader concerns about his leadership. Cardillo notes the Democrats' dilemma regarding Biden's replacement, while Claven emphasizes the seriousness of the situation, likening it to elder abuse. The conversation shifts to college campuses, where protests have erupted in support of Hamas, with Rubin criticizing the media's handling of anti-Semitism. They highlight the role of outside agitators and the failure of university administrations to maintain order. Cardillo expresses frustration with the NYPD's limitations under current leadership, while Claven argues that the far-left's tactics are destructive and rooted in a hatred of America and Israel. They also touch on the implications of progressive policies in cities like Los Angeles, where crime is rising amid calls to reduce prison populations. The hosts conclude that the consequences of such policies are dire, with cities like San Francisco serving as cautionary tales for the future.

The PBD podcast, hosted by Patrick Bet-David, discusses various current events and topics. Patrick reflects on a recent interview with Khabib Nurmagomedov, highlighting two intense questions he posed regarding gender identity in Russia and the emotional impact of Michael Jordan's documentary on Khabib's career. The podcast also touches on the backlash against Disney's new Snow White film, where the lead actress expressed a desire to not have a love story with a man, leading to criticism from fans. The conversation shifts to Michael Burry, known for predicting the 2008 financial crisis, who has made a significant $1.6 billion bet against the stock market, raising discussions about potential market downturns. The hosts analyze Burry's history of accurate predictions and his contrarian investment strategies, suggesting that his bearish stance may indicate an overvalued market. The podcast covers various economic issues, including Target's first quarterly sales drop in six years, attributed to backlash from its Pride Month initiatives, and the rise of stay-at-home dads as more men drop out of the workforce. The hosts also discuss the implications of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) ratings being scaled back by S&P, indicating a shift in corporate focus away from these measures. In a more serious segment, the podcast addresses the humanitarian crisis in Nagorno-Karabakh, where ethnic Armenians face potential genocide due to Azerbaijan's blockade. The hosts express concern over the lack of international intervention and the dire situation for the residents. The discussion also highlights the alarming rise in heart attacks post-pandemic and the concerning state of commercial real estate, with Wall Street firms poised to buy distressed properties at low prices. The hosts emphasize the importance of being proactive in business and investment strategies during uncertain economic times. Lastly, the podcast touches on the chaotic crime situation in San Francisco, where employees are advised not to drive to work due to rampant crime, and the implications of failed policies leading to a decline in safety and quality of life in major cities. The hosts conclude with a message of hope and resilience, encouraging listeners to remain informed and engaged in societal issues.

Megyn Kelly discusses various controversial topics with guests Carrie Prejean and Jason Rantz. They start by addressing Megan Rapinoe's retirement from soccer, criticizing her disdain for the national anthem and her perceived lack of gratitude towards the country that supported her career. They also highlight the introduction of a non-binary character in a popular children's show, Paw Patrol, suggesting it is an attempt to indoctrinate children with gender ideology. Carrie Prejean expresses her outrage over California State Senator Scott Weiner, who she accuses of promoting harmful legislation affecting children, particularly regarding gender identity. She describes a recent event in San Francisco, the Folsom Street Fair, as graphic and inappropriate, criticizing Weiner for celebrating it. The conversation shifts to the broader implications of such legislation and the perceived moral decay in society. Jason Rantz joins to discuss his book, "What's Killing America," focusing on crime and homelessness in progressive cities. He points out the surge in juvenile crime due to policies that decriminalize certain behaviors and the failure of restorative justice programs. Rantz emphasizes the need for accountability in the justice system, especially for violent offenders, and critiques the harm reduction approach to drug addiction, which he argues has led to increased fatalities. The discussion also touches on the homelessness crisis, with Rantz explaining that simply providing housing without addressing underlying issues like addiction is ineffective. He highlights the failures of the "housing first" model and the negative consequences of policies that prioritize compassion over public safety. The conversation concludes with a focus on the fentanyl crisis, detailing how drug cartels are lacing pills with fentanyl, leading to increased overdoses and deaths. Rantz stresses the urgency of addressing these issues, arguing that the current approach is failing to protect children and communities.

Mind Pump hosts Sal Di Stefano, Adam Schafer, and Justin Andrews discuss the homelessness crisis in California with Dr. Drew Pinsky. They explore how Prop 47 and Prop 57 have contributed to the issue by legalizing drug use and theft, leading to a significant increase in homelessness, particularly in California. Dr. Drew highlights that around 70-80% of the homeless population suffers from mental illness or drug addiction, exacerbated by a lack of treatment facilities and ineffective public policies. He criticizes the narrative that homelessness is solely due to high living costs, arguing that untreated mental illness and addiction are major factors. The discussion also touches on the impact of COVID-19 on the homeless, noting that infections are surprisingly low among them, possibly due to outdoor living conditions. Dr. Drew urges citizens to advocate for better mental health policies and treatment options, emphasizing the need for a compassionate approach to address this public health crisis.

Bold warnings set the tone: in Washington, Tim Dylan and Saga describe a rising sense that the government has militarized the streets, with National Guard on standby and a system that claims to decide what crosses the line. They say a surveillance state is taking shape—tech monitoring, social media screening for anti‑Semitism, and a bureaucratic posture that would jail people for their thoughts. The conversation links these moves to long‑timed conspiracy theories, arguing this is the 'wet dream' Alex Jones warned about, now unfolding before the public eye. They shift to Washington, DC, crime, and policing. They recount incidents like a federal occupation of the city after January 6, discuss juvenile offenders and prosecutions, and cite Judge Janine’s decision to scale back firearm charges. They critique the Trump administration's approach as showmanship rather than execution, noting poll results showing DC residents largely oppose federal police takeover. They contrast perceived incompetence with the seriousness of crime, arguing residents want more lawful enforcement in poorer neighborhoods, even as city leaders push back against tougher policing. On drugs, homelessness, and policy, they link national trends to local conditions, arguing fentanyl, addiction, and a perceived lack of social safety nets drive crime and degrade quality of life. They advocate a shift from 'toxic empathy' to paternalism, supporting mandatory rehab or accountability measures, while acknowledging civil liberties concerns. They compare different cities, praising New York’s tougher stance and criticizing places like San Francisco. The dialogue ends by acknowledging the political backlash to these hardline tactics and the broader question of how to balance safety with rights.

On March 9, 2021, Dave Rubin discusses several pressing issues, starting with Joe Biden's apparent cognitive difficulties, highlighting his inability to remember names and locations, which he argues poses a national security risk. He criticizes mainstream media for not addressing these concerns, suggesting a reality disconnect for those only consuming traditional news sources. Rubin then critiques Don Lemon's commentary on racism within the British royal family, expressing concern over the dangerous implications of unchallenged accusations of racism. He also targets a New York Times piece on Senator Josh Hawley, arguing it unfairly relies on opinions from his past acquaintances rather than substantive evidence. Lastly, he addresses the closure of Walgreens in San Francisco due to rampant shoplifting, attributing it to lenient laws that treat theft under $950 as a misdemeanor, which he believes exacerbates crime and societal decay in progressive cities.

Michael Shellenberger, president of Environmental Progress and author of *San Francisco: Why Progressives Ruin Cities*, discusses his political evolution, revealing he no longer identifies as a Democrat due to moral concerns about California's state of affairs. He expresses frustration over the state's handling of homelessness and drug addiction, likening it to living in a morally unacceptable environment. Shellenberger emphasizes the need for a balanced approach to homelessness, advocating for a "shelter-first" and "treatment-first" policy rather than the failed "housing-first" approach. He highlights the alarming rise in drug-related deaths, particularly from fentanyl, and criticizes progressive policies that prioritize victim ideology over effective solutions. Shellenberger argues that the progressive agenda has worsened conditions for vulnerable populations, as it fails to address the root causes of addiction and homelessness. He notes that many Californians are dissatisfied with the status quo and calls for leadership that can articulate a comprehensive plan to address these issues. The conversation touches on the need for accountability and the importance of personal responsibility in overcoming addiction, while also recognizing the complexities of mental health care. Ultimately, Shellenberger advocates for a pragmatic approach that combines compassion with necessary consequences for behavior.