TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Johnson & Johnson is recalling Neutrogena and Aveeno sunscreens due to benzene contamination. Benzene is a colorless, odorless chemical linked to cancer, particularly leukemia. Despite generating $81.6 billion in revenue, only $14 billion comes from consumer products like sunscreen; the majority is from pharmaceuticals and medical devices. Their growth is driven by drugs like IMBRUVICA and DARZALEX, which are used to treat leukemia. This raises questions about the presence of a known carcinogen in their sunscreens.

The largest merger ever done in Germany was Bayer and Monsanto. Bayer is a pharmaceutical company, and Monsanto is an agrochemical company in the United States. Bayer makes cancer drugs for diseases like non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Monsanto makes Roundup, the most widely used pesticide in America, and the cancer that it causes is non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Monsanto paid out $11 billion in the past couple of years for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma cases. The companies merging are directly known to cause the disease with a medical company that has a treatment for the disease.

The speaker discusses chemical exposure and endocrine disruption, focusing on atrazine and common consumer products. Atrazine is described as a herbicide and the second most used herbicide in North America, after glyphosate. The speaker notes atrazine is illegal in Europe and claims that in Europe it’s not allowed at all. They state that “they’ll call it male feminization” when animals are exposed to atrazine, giving an example: a frog exposed to two hundred nanograms per deciliter of atrazine becomes female, turning a male frog female. The implication is that such exposures reflect effects seen in many Americans. Beyond atrazine, the speaker mentions plastic water bottles and the presence of fragrance and parabens that rub onto the skin, leading to skin absorption of these chemicals. The discussion then shifts to sunscreen chemicals, specifically oxybenzone, described as by far the most widely used chemical in sunscreen and an estrogen endocrine disruptor that acts like estrogen in the body. A study is cited: after publishing a book, a study on oxybenzone and one application of sunscreen found that seven days later, oxybenzone levels in people’s blood were above government safety limits. This observation is presented as applying to an adult who used oxybenzone once, with some people applying sunscreen five days a week to children or more, contributing to multiple daily applications. The speaker ties this to personal care products that claim to keep the face protected from the sun, implying frequent use leads to higher exposure. Key points emphasized include the prevalence of atrazine use in North America, its alleged legal status in Europe, the concept of “male feminization” in animals due to atrazine exposure, and the broader concern about everyday products—plastic bottles, fragrances, parabens, and sunscreen (notably oxybenzone)—as sources of estrogenic or endocrine-disrupting chemicals, with a cited study showing one application of sunscreen resulting in blood levels exceeding safety limits after seven days. The overall narrative links environmental chemical exposure to potential reproductive and hormonal effects, highlighting concerns about consumer products and regulations across regions.

In the US, 23 sunscreen brands were pulled from the market for allegedly containing cancer-causing properties. The law regarding sunscreen filters hasn't changed in over 20 years, which is why European sunscreens are considered better due to more modern filters. Filters in skincare are not the greatest ingredient. Damaging the skin constantly with treatments like retinol and peels makes it vulnerable, allowing the sun to penetrate harder, leading to pigmentation, aging, inflammation, and potentially cancer. Instead of constant sunscreen use, it's better to strengthen the skin through hydration, nutrition, telomerase activation, and exosomes to make it the best it can be and reduce inflammation.

Chemical filters in sunscreen, like oxybenzone, avobenzone, and octinoxate, have raised concerns due to potential toxic effects. Studies suggest oxybenzone, an endocrine disruptor, can interfere with hormone systems, potentially leading to reproductive issues, hormone imbalances, and cancer. The EU Scientific Committee for Consumer Safety has outlined health issues linked to these UV filters. These chemicals may not completely wash off, absorbing into the bloodstream and accumulating over time. Evidence suggests widespread exposure, with 97% of people having oxybenzone in their urine. Given the recommendation for daily, liberal, and frequent sunscreen application, even for children as young as six months, there are concerns about toxicant exposure, especially since children are particularly sensitive to toxic injury. It's important to make informed choices to protect our health.

Simply Orange, owned by Coca Cola, is facing backlash for high levels of toxic forever chemicals found in their juice. These PFAS chemicals, used in nonstick pans, are 100 times above federal limits. Despite the brand's image, the juice contains harmful pesticides and synthetic vitamins. Coca Cola is being sued for misleading consumers about the product's safety. Let me know in the comments if you have consumed this contaminated juice.

According to the speaker, 15-20% of women who developed ovarian cancer in the last 50 years did so because of Johnson's baby powder. The speaker claims tens of thousands of women died in the last century due to using Johnson's baby powder. The speaker alleges Johnson & Johnson knew for decades that their baby powder was contaminated with asbestos. The FDA tested the product in 2019 and reportedly found asbestos. The speaker asserts Johnson & Johnson has avoided accountability for decades.

Johnson and Johnson knowingly sold baby powder with asbestos since the 1970s, leading to lawsuits. FDA recalls products for asbestos. Johnson and Johnson owns popular brands like Splenda, which contains harmful ingredients. FDA-approved Splenda linked to health risks. Top owners of Johnson and Johnson are Vanguard, State Street, and BlackRock, who also own major food brands. Research ownership of brands to uncover connections. Concerns about other harmful ingredients in products.

The speaker discusses the various criminal activities of Johnson and Johnson, including their involvement in the World Trade Center incident, the opioid crisis, and the talcum powder lawsuits. They highlight the company's fraudulent practices, bribery, and manipulation of clinical data. The speaker emphasizes that Johnson and Johnson knew their talcum powders caused ovarian cancer but did nothing about it. They also mention the company's bankruptcy declaration and the lack of accountability for the harm caused. The speaker concludes by urging people not to trust Johnson and Johnson and criticizing Congress for allowing such actions to continue.

In May 2019, the FDA reported that sunscreen chemicals penetrate the bloodstream after just one day of use, exceeding FDA standards. Oxybenzone reached that level after only two hours. These chemicals alter metabolic machinery, burden the liver and kidneys, and cause sickness.

According to the National Cancer Institute, melanoma has increased over 200% since sunscreen was introduced in 1940. Spray sunscreens like Banana Boat contain isobutanes, fragrances, and benzoates derived from fossil fuels. These chemicals disrupt the endocrine system, prevent proper sun absorption, and fry the skin. Isobutane, also found in lighters, is absorbed through the skin, the body's largest organ. Many sunscreen brands use similar toxic ingredients, which are harmful despite their convenience.

The speaker discusses the numerous unethical practices of Johnson and Johnson, a company that has faced lawsuits for fraud, bribery, and deceptive marketing. They specifically mention the issue of asbestos in talcum powder, which the company knew about but failed to address. The speaker also mentions a case involving a pharmaceutical called factor 8, which was infected with HIV and caused deaths. They criticize Johnson and Johnson for declaring bankruptcy to avoid liability. The speaker concludes by stating that Congress allows such behavior to continue.

The speaker discusses the numerous unethical practices of Johnson and Johnson, a company that has faced lawsuits for fraud, bribery, and deceptive marketing. They specifically mention the issue of asbestos in talcum powder, which the company knew about but failed to address. The speaker also mentions a case involving a pharmaceutical called factor 8, which was infected with HIV and caused deaths. They criticize Johnson and Johnson for declaring bankruptcy to avoid liability. The speaker concludes by urging people not to trust the company and criticizing Congress for allowing such practices to continue.

Johnson and Johnson is described as the largest, costliest, and deadliest criminal conspiracy in American history, allegedly causing or contributing to the deaths of 2,000,000 Americans. Grand jury documents reportedly show Johnson and Johnson sales reps told psychiatrists not to worry about killing patients because they wouldn't get caught, and to hide their tracks by diagnosing patients with late-onset schizophrenia, which the speaker claims doesn't exist. Johnson and Johnson has purportedly spent $35 billion on lawyers and litigation since February 2011. Experts, when consulted off the record, warned about the company's powerful lawyers. The speaker contrasts Johnson and Johnson's "no more tears" baby commercials with what they claim is the company's reality.

The Wall Street Journal questioned why sunscreen is not used. The speaker promotes a tallow-based sun balm as a healthier alternative to chemical sunscreens. They were fact-checked by the Journal, revealing conflicts of interest with scientists funded by Johnson & Johnson. The speaker suspects financial motives behind sunscreen recommendations.

Johnson and Johnson is recalling Neutrogena and Aveeno sunscreens due to the presence of benzene, a colorless and flammable chemical linked to cancer, particularly leukemia. Despite generating $81.6 billion in revenue, only $14 billion comes from consumer products, with the majority from pharmaceuticals and medical devices. Their pharmaceutical growth is driven by drugs like IMBRUVICA and DARZALEX, which are used to treat leukemia. This raises questions about the inclusion of a carcinogen in their sunscreens while profiting from cancer treatment medications.

Simply Orange, owned by Coca Cola, has been caught using high levels of toxic forever chemicals in their juice. These chemicals, known as PFAS, are used to coat nonstick pans and have damaging effects on the human body. The juice contains hundreds of times the federal limits for drinking water. This controversy is in addition to the fact that Simply Orange is not organic and contains pesticides and herbicides. Coca Cola is now facing a lawsuit for these issues.

Johnson & Johnson is recalling Neutrogena and Aveeno sunscreens due to cancer-causing benzene. Benzene is used in various products and is linked to leukemia. The company's revenue is mainly from pharmaceuticals like IMBRUVICA, which treats leukemia. This raises suspicion about why benzene was in their sunscreens.

Simply Orange, owned by Coca Cola, is facing backlash for high levels of toxic forever chemicals found in their orange juice. These chemicals, known as PFAS, are harmful to human health and exceed federal limits by hundreds of times. Despite the brand's image of simplicity, the juice contains dangerous substances. Coca Cola is being sued for misleading consumers about the safety of Simply Orange. Let me know in the comments if you have consumed this contaminated product.

Breast cancer affects one in eight women and may be linked to environmental estrogens. Six billion pounds of pesticides are sprayed on food, acting as estrogen receptor agonists and are toxic to cellular biology. Pesticides include herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides. The merger of Bayer, a pharmaceutical company, and Monsanto, an agrochemical company, is concerning. Bayer makes cancer drugs for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, while Monsanto's Roundup, a widely used pesticide, causes the same cancer. Monsanto paid out $11 billion for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma cases. This merger creates a revolving door: companies cause illness, treat the illness, and hide the science.

Directly from the J and J website, they are doing a voluntary recall of Neutrogena and Aveeno sunscreen products due to the presence of benz According to the CDC, it is a chemical that is colorless, odorless, and highly flammable What does it use to make? Lubricants, rubbers, thighs, detergents, drugs, and pesticides And according to the American Cancer Society, benzene is known to cause cancer, specifically leukemia and other cancers of blood Well, if you look at their revenues, they have $81,600,000,000 in revenue, and only 14,000,000,000 of that is from consumer facing products like Neutrogena and Aveeno But the rest of all of this is from their pharmaceuticals and medical devices And apparently, their growth is primarily led by its pharmaceutical business, specifically their sales of IMBRUVKA and DARZALEX But what does IMBRUVKA do? You guessed it. Treats leukemia

The FDA issued a report in May 2019 stating that sunscreen chemicals penetrate the bloodstream, exceeding FDA standards after only one day of use. Oxybenzone reached that level after only two hours. These chemicals change your complex metabolic machinery, put a load on your liver and kidneys, and make you sick. Sunscreen sales have increased 38 times in the last 30 years. Since 1982, the incidence of melanoma has doubled.

Johnson and Johnson regulatory scientist Joshua Reese revealed the company is aware of asbestos and dangerous levels of heavy metals in their baby powder, which can cause cancer. This information has never been shared with the public. According to an executive and senior clinical analyst at J&J, David Altman, internal testing confirmed asbestos in talcum powder as far back as the 1970s. Altman suspects his own family members have been affected by J&J's baby powder. He stated that J&J doesn't care about people and is motivated by corporate greed, but he remains with the company for the money and longevity rewards. J&J allegedly knew about the harm caused by their products but didn't consider it statistically significant. The company is accused of creating a shell company to handle talc-related lawsuits and potentially bankrupt it to avoid payouts. Altman believes the company is "evil" and that they "don't really give a s*** about people."

If ingredient labels were accurate, sunscreen could warn of neurotoxicity issues like dizziness, seizures, depression, migraine, headache, and insomnia, and endocrine disruption, including reproductive and sexual abnormalities with long-term use, due to undisclosed fragrance chemicals and phthalates. Sunscreen labels could also state an increased risk of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and allergic contact dermatitis, including skin irritation, redness, and tightness, with ingredients like Octisalate and Octocrylene. Daily moisturizing lotion labels could warn of an increased risk of breast cancer and endocrine disruption, such as early puberty, decreased sperm count, and impaired mental development, with ingredients like parabens, such as methyl and propylparaben. Extra caution should be taken with leave-on products.

Johnson and Johnson regulatory scientist Joshua Reese revealed the company is aware of asbestos and dangerous levels of heavy metals in their baby powder, which can cause cancer. This information has allegedly never been shared with the public. J&J executive David Altman suspects his own family was affected by the company's baby powder. Altman stated that J&J doesn't "give a shit about people" and affirmed the company is "evil." He believes corporate greed is rampant and lawsuits should be settled immediately. Altman admitted he stays with the company for the money and longevity rewards. He also stated that J&J is aware that the talc mines they source from are not 100% accurate and contain impurities. According to Altman, J&J created a shell company to bankrupt it and avoid talcum powder lawsuits. He said the company decided to settle the cases to avoid paying lawyers.