reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Judicial Watch has filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the Department of Justice for details about a meeting between Attorney General Merrick Garland and General Mark Milley, where they reportedly discussed President Trump. Milley allegedly pressured Garland to investigate far-right militia groups, a meeting described as unusual by journalist Bob Woodward in his book, War. Judicial Watch's lawsuit follows the DOJ's failure to respond to a FOIA request regarding this meeting. Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton stated that the meeting highlights the Biden administration's conflict with constitutional principles and the DOJ's disregard for transparency. Additionally, President Biden is reportedly considering granting General Milley a preemptive pardon similar to that of his son, Hunter.

Weeks of controversy over allegations of an improper romantic relationship between Fulton County District Attorney Fonny Willis and a special prosecutor in the 2020 election interference case culminated in a lengthy court filing from Willis. The filing, more than 170 pages, includes Willis’s admission of a “personal relationship” with special prosecutor Nathan Wade, but she asserts that relationship should not impact their roles in the case. In January, a defendant in the ongoing 2020 election case moved to disqualify Willis, arguing that she appointed Wade as a special prosecutor and that she financially benefited from the relationship. Willis’s latest motion disputes that portrayal. Eleven Alive previously reported that Wade paid for airline tickets for the pair to travel to San Francisco and Miami; Willis, however, writes that financial responsibility for personal travel is divided roughly evenly between the two, with all expenses paid using individual personal funds. The outlet had also reported that Wade was paid more than $500,000 more than the two other special prosecutors on the case; Willis contends Wade earned more money because he “made much more work.” Legal experts Daryl Cohen and Clark Cunningham offered differing views on how the filing might affect the case going into the February 15 hearing. Cohen suggested the judge could determine that the matter does not require disqualification but that the parties are under intense scrutiny. Cunningham anticipated the disqualification issue would not be resolved at the hearing and described the matter as very complicated. The February 15 hearing will be the first time these allegations are publicly addressed in open court. In a related matter, the US House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan released a letter indicating he subpoenaed documents from Willis. The subpoena seeks documents related to the DA’s use of federal funds after a conservative outlet published accusations that Willis fired an employee who attempted to halt the misuse of federal funds intended for youth gang prevention programs. The documents are also linked to the January 6 investigation. Atlanta News First political reporter Doug Reardon reported from outside the Fulton County Courthouse that the open records requests were issued through Georgia’s open records law. The judge, Robert McBurney, previously admonished Willis for not complying within required time frames, with the court asserting that Willis must turn over documents requested by the conservative nonprofit Judicial Watch. The judge stated that Willis had five days to produce the documents and that, according to him, the court had effectively declared a violation of the Open Records Act. Some communications, he noted, are of public interest and not protected by privilege.

Judicial Watch has been engaged in open records lawsuits for over 30 years, and this situation is unprecedented. A government official has been found in default by a court in a straightforward open records case. This raises concerns about Fannie Willis' capabilities or potential corruption.

For two and a half years, we've been trying to find out who paid for the Jesse Morgan truck. The postal service changed their document retention policy from 6 years to 30 days in April 2020, and then changed it back in March 2021. They destroyed some documents after the election. They got a federal judge, Emmett Sullivan, to sign off on this change. When they finally turned over the requested information in October 2020, they had whited out the important dates. Their own lawyer reprimanded them for not following the law. They refuse to disclose the information, even if ordered by a federal judge. The government is going rogue and disrespecting the judge overseeing the case. The new judge is an Obama appointee, and it seems like they're trying to delay until their own people are in power.

Yesterday, we told you that new documents we got showed that Fonny Willis was recording was working secretly behind the scenes with the Biden justice department, the Biden White House, and the j six democrats to create a double jeopardy, double drain on Donald Trump's supporters by creating a similar indictment to Jack Smith, but in Georgia to move resources and lawyers and and attention span and divide it. We have we're supposed to have a justice system that avoids double jeopardy, but in this case, you can see the plot being created by these lawyers and by the collaboration. Today, we raise a question or we provide some evidence to a question that Jim Jordan raised about a year ago, the House Judiciary Committee Chairman. He believed that Fonny Willis' prosecution of Trump was being underwritten by the justice department because he saw a stream of funding. What we see, what we've provided to the public, is an unusual situation. In the middle of Willis building your case against Donald Trump and 18 of his allies and and to charge them with conspiracy in and racketeering in Georgia to double up on what Jack Smith charged in Washington, The justice department comes to Fonny Willis and says, hey. We just want you to apply for this grant, and we're gonna take this grant, which is normally competitive. We're gonna make it noncompetitive. Basically, you're the only one that's gonna get the money. Just fill out the paperwork and take your cash, about $2,000,000. It's that classic Washington grant, go help kids, not really much specificity, but they move it from competitive to sole source, meaning that it's wired just for her. It looks like the old Boss Hogg way of doing business or Tammany Hall way of doing business. And I think for Jim Jordan or Barry Loudermilk who was on our show last night investigating January 6 from the judiciary committee, this is a pretty serious issue for them to investigate. This looks like a gift grant to Fonny Willis while she's doing the bidding of Joe Biden to pursue and tie down Donald Trump and his friends in a criminal prosecution in Atlanta. It looks just like Tammany Hall, Chicago style politics, and there's now a complete body of documents for congress to look at this. It's it's a pretty pretty clear case of what's going on.

Just the News reports a story based on thousands of pages of documents obtained over years with the help of America First Legal, focusing on Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and her prosecution of a state case against Donald Trump that mirrored the federal case led by Jack Smith. The documents, they say, show that Willis was in deep collusion with the Justice Department, with the January 6 Democrats, and with the Biden White House. The claim is that the Biden White House said it would waive Donald Trump’s executive privilege for Willis, and the Justice Department said it would waive and approve Willis’s 2E requests to obtain federal workers to help build a case against a national figure at the state level. The report asserts the “fix was in” and that this constitutes the strongest evidence to date of coordinated action to pursue Trump across jurisdictions. The asserted significance is that the Democrats intentionally and strategically created a double jeopardy, double drain machine to go after Trump, potentially infringing civil liberties by pursuing prosecutions in multiple venues for the same or related conduct. The narrative claims this involved the Biden White House, the Biden DOJ, and the January 6 Democrats pressing Willis to create a system where Trump could be targeted in more than one place, a scenario described as a “double jeopardy, double drain.” The report suggests this development is now focused in Miami and anticipates further disclosures. Looking ahead, the program teases next steps: tomorrow they plan to reveal whether there was a financial incentive or “financial follow the money” stream to Willis tied to her pursuit. They note that if this pattern occurred in Georgia, there are similar election cases in Wisconsin and Arizona, raising questions about federal taxpayers funding state efforts to smear Trump and create multi-state double jeopardy scenarios. The discussion frames these elements as part of a conspiracy case beginning to unfold in Miami. Upcoming segments are promised to include new election integrity revelations from figures like Tulsi Gabbard, Kash Patel, and Pam Bondi. These revelations are expected to concern intrusions and issues targeting the 2026 election, with the aim of informing Senate members—potentially swaying those on the fence about the Save or related measures. The program signals that these developments will be explored in upcoming appearances, including guests such as Barry Loudermilk.

Fox News reports new information that appears to contradict the Biden administration’s stance that it had nothing to do with DOJ investigations into then-President Trump’s alleged retention of classified material and the Mar-a-Lago raid. Correspondent David Spunt notes emails obtained by Fox News show coordination between the White House counsel’s office and the DOJ regarding an interview of Walt Nada, a current White House aide to President Biden who was then a former Trump aide in Florida. Nada was later charged alongside Trump by Special Counsel Jack Smith. The May 10, 2022 email reads in part: “coordination with DOJ and White House counsel are in work to start the process to confirm and interview current administration employee Walt Nada. This event is dependent upon the timeline of president Biden's brief decision and coordination between White House counsel and DOJ and, in turn, Evan Corcoran's position on the override of privilege assertion and whether or not he seeks an injunction to prevent access.” The email was written by an FBI agent and Evan Corcoran, one of Trump’s lawyers at the time. The report notes that August would mark four years since the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago. Following this, then-Attorney General Merrick Garland stated, “I personally approve the decision to seek a search warrant in this matter. Second, the department does not take such a decision lightly.” Reaction to the emails includes House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan stating, “it's always worse than we thought” and that the newly released documents confirm the Biden DOJ’s raid on Mar-a-Lago was politically motivated. Attorney General Pam Bondi weighs in, saying the more we learn about the DOJ weaponization under the prior administration, the worse the story gets. Bondi adds, “we will continue disclosing key evidence to our congressional partners to deliver the truth and bring those who committed crimes to justice.”

Speaker 1 mentions waiting for Bonnie Willis to respond. They discuss a whistleblower in her office who raised concerns about misuse of funds. Willis fired the whistleblower, prompting a subpoena for related documents. Willis made US Marshals serve the subpoena. They joke about Willis' behavior and mention CPAC. They express appreciation for CPAC's support of conservative principles. Translation: The speakers discuss Bonnie Willis not responding, a whistleblower's concerns, a subpoena for documents, and Willis' behavior. They joke about CPAC and express gratitude for its support of conservative principles.

Congressman Jim Jordan has set a deadline for Fulton County DA Fonnie Willis to provide documents related to allegations of collusion with the Biden administration during her investigation of President-elect Trump. Jordan claims Willis conspired with the Justice Department and questions her motives regarding Trump's interference in Georgia's 2020 election. In response, Willis accuses Jordan of violating the US Constitution in an attempt to disrupt her prosecution of Trump and his co-defendants.

Margie, there's a scandal in Georgia involving Fannie Willis, who is running an anti-Trump operation. She allegedly paid her boyfriend $650,000 and went on expensive trips with him using taxpayer money. Some people are arguing that this undermines the racketeering charges against them. It's also been revealed that her boyfriend had consulting ties with the Biden White House. Many Georgians, including myself, are fed up with Willis using her position and taxpayer dollars to target Trump and his allies instead of prosecuting real criminals. I'm urging Governor Kemp and Attorney General Chris Carr to investigate and prosecute Willis and her boyfriend for their corrupt actions. This witch hunt needs to end immediately.

Trump's judge, Eileen Cannon, released unredacted court filings showing coordination between the White House, DOJ, and National Archives in indicting Trump. Documents reveal the GSA demanded Trump's team retrieve boxes of documents, possibly containing classified info, from DC. Biden's White House, DOJ, and National Archives may be conspiring to charge Trump for keeping classified material. Jack Smith tried to hide this info. Biden, accused of mishandling classified info, mocked Trump's legal issues. Biden's administration met with National Archives and DOJ to prosecute Trump shortly after he left office.

The Heritage Foundation's Oversight Project is suing the FBI for refusing to release documents related to alleged retaliation against whistleblowers who exposed efforts to suppress the investigation into Hunter Biden's laptop. The former FBI agent involved, Tim Tippoldt, had a history of attacking Trump on social media. Whistleblowers claim Tippoldt tried to portray news about Hunter's business dealings as Russian disinformation and attempted to erase information from the FBI database. Tippoldt's girlfriend, in now-deleted social media posts, suggested that the FBI would retaliate against the whistleblowers. The Heritage Foundation seeks to determine if the FBI was aware of this intimidation and allowed it to continue. They believe this could obstruct Congress and are taking the case to Federal Court. The Foundation's outside counsel finds the FBI's claims of privacy interests in this matter to be frivolous.

Judicial Watch is in court regarding a Gaza cover-up involving USAID, where the recipients of cash in Gaza are being hidden. The State Department claims revealing the recipients would endanger them, implying potential Israeli retaliation. The Biden administration allegedly gave money to Gaza, and in court, it was argued that Judicial Watch waived its rights to access the specific names of those who received funds from the grant recipient. While Catholic Relief Services, which received $7,000,000, was identified, the groups in Gaza to which they distributed the money are being withheld. Judicial Watch plans to file another FOIA lawsuit to uncover who received USAID money in Gaza. They claim this is a Biden cover-up enabled by the Justice Department. The speaker expresses outrage, asserting that the Trump administration would not want to conceal this information. They believe USAID is providing support to terrorists and accuses the State and Justice Departments of playing a shell game.

Jack Smith, granted a subpoena to investigate Donald Trump's Twitter account. The subpoena requested information on users who liked, followed, and retweeted Trump. The scope of the subpoena is concerning, as it includes the names and user account information of everyone associated with Trump on Twitter. Twitter initially didn't challenge the subpoena's scope but fought against the restriction on disclosing the request. The Justice Department, led by Biden, is involved in this operation, which raises questions about potential targeting of Facebook users as well. This politicized investigation by the federal level Justice Department and FBI is seen as a form of political policing under Biden's administration. Trump has vowed to protect his followers from such intrusion.

Judicial Watch's $30 million lawsuit for Ashley Babbitt's family against the federal government faces challenges as the Biden administration tries to move the case from California to Washington, DC. The administration's motive seems to be seeking favorable judges in DC who may be biased against Babbitt. This move is seen as an attempt to manipulate the outcome of the case, which is viewed as shameful by Judicial Watch.

Judicial Watch is suing for the release of the Epstein files, including the client list and related documents held by the Justice Department and the FBI. They claim they have been stonewalled and that their FOIA request has not been answered. Judicial Watch states that going to federal court is the best way to determine what records exist, which are being withheld, and the scope of the search for these records. They assert their aim is to uncover government secrets related to the Epstein scandal that the government does not want the public to know.

The discussion centers on the claim that the Trump administration has been “draining the Washington DC swamp” by using a Biden-era policy, and that Trump actually tricked Biden into enacting it. The speakers present several linked points. - A report is cited: federal government employment fell by 9,000 jobs in April, and is down about 345,000 jobs since Trump took office. The speakers show a graph suggesting Trump’s entrance coincides with a “free fall,” and claim these are the lowest federal employment numbers in the country since 1966. - They attribute this purge of federal workers to a Biden-era policy that, according to their narrative, the Biden administration inadvertently made it easier for Trump to fire executive-branch employees. This claim is tied to coverage from the Heritage Foundation. - Speaker 1 recounts a sequence of events involving the firing of federal employees after Biden took office. They describe receiving an email in Biden’s early months stating that recipients must resign by a certain time or be fired, implying a policy or practice of compelled resignations. - They recount American First Legal’s attempt to sue the Biden administration, seeking plaintiffs to challenge the right to fire federal employees. They describe a process in which they hoped to lose in court so that Biden’s position would proceed to higher courts, claiming they ultimately lost at both the district court and the appeals level, with Trump then prevailing in the broader effort. - The narrative continues with the speaker mentioning contacting people and referencing it as “my servant v Biden,” followed by a call from the Washington Post about the Kennedy Center board being fired. The speaker jokes about being recognized for Dancing with the Stars rather than ballet, and the reporter’s line of inquiry is said to pivot to a statement issued by the Kennedy Center board. - The overall arc emphasized is that a Biden-era policy is claimed to have enabled broad layoffs in the executive branch, that this policy was “codified” or reinforced by actions in Biden’s early tenure, and that legal challenges by conservative groups to resist or contest these moves were unsuccessful, leading to what the speakers present as Trump succeeding in reducing federal employment and purging federal workers. The Kennedy Center firing is cited as part of the broader narrative of fired or compelled resignations as part of perceived administrative shakeups.

Fannie Willis recently revealed she has records of her communications related to the January 6 operation against Trump, following a Judicial Watch lawsuit. Initially, she claimed no such records existed, but a court found her in default for not responding to the lawsuit. Instead of complying with the court's suggestion to release the records, she is attempting to use legal exemptions to withhold them. This situation suggests she was involved in collusion with the Pelosi operation, shows a disregard for the rule of law, and undermines the public's right to know. Legal actions will continue to challenge this.

The White House confirmed Letitia James and Fannie Willis visited before suing Trump. Willis appointed her alleged lover to prosecute Trump, paying him $650,000 in taxpayer money. Nathan Wade conspired with the White House, billing them for meetings. Willis also collaborated with Adam Schiff on the January 6th case. Republicans were barred from the committee, which later destroyed evidence. Is the Biden White House orchestrating Trump's prosecution? - Armstrong Williams. Translation: The White House confirmed that Letitia James and Fannie Willis visited before suing Trump. Willis appointed her alleged lover to prosecute Trump, paying him $650,000 in taxpayer money. Nathan Wade conspired with the White House, billing them for meetings. Willis also collaborated with Adam Schiff on the January 6th case. Republicans were barred from the committee, which later destroyed evidence. Is the Biden White House orchestrating Trump's prosecution? - Armstrong Williams.

The Justice Department refused to provide Judicial Watch with audio tapes of Joe Biden's interviews with special counsel Robert Hearn, citing privacy concerns. The released transcript raises questions about Biden's memory and ability to serve as president. Judicial Watch plans to challenge this decision in court, arguing that the American people have a right to access this information. Biden has the power to waive his privacy rights and release the tapes, but has not done so.

Fannie Willis has acknowledged her communication with the Pelosi January 6th committee, revealing a potential collaboration in the efforts against Trump. This admission came after a court found her in default for not responding to Judicial Watch's lawsuit. Initially, she denied having the documents but now seeks to withhold them, citing privileges and exemptions. Judicial Watch plans to challenge this secrecy in court. This situation raises concerns about the integrity of Willis's prosecution, suggesting it is tainted by dishonesty and disregard for the law.

President Trump's case in Georgia is facing a sex scandal involving the district attorney, Fannie Willis. She is accused of appointing her lover, Nathan Wade, as a special prosecutor in the case against Trump. Wade, who has limited experience in high-profile cases, has already been paid nearly $1 million in legal fees. These payments were authorized by Willis using taxpayer money. They have allegedly enjoyed luxury vacations together and Willis does not deny hiring someone she is romantically involved with to prosecute the case.

Maricopa County officials are refusing to provide routers or router images to election auditors, defying a judge's orders. Initially, they claimed to have replaced the equipment and would provide it to the Senate, but later suggested virtual access instead. After weeks of delays, they now express concerns about potential risks to other agencies if they share the information. Additionally, it was noted that Hannah Klein, daughter of Biden's chief of staff, signed a document to the DOJ on behalf of the Brennan Center for Justice. There are questions about the Biden administration's involvement in this situation, but there is no comment on whether President Biden is hiding anything.

Judicial Watch exposed significant corruption involving the FBI and DOJ against Trump, revealing abuses related to FISA, Comey's actions, and a conspiracy against him. Key figures, including Obama, Clinton, and others, were aware of Trump's innocence but chose to target him nonetheless. This situation is portrayed as more severe than Watergate, emphasizing that Trump is a victim of these actions.