reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Stretch, which is 04:30 in the morning, and they have cut the power to our side of the ostrich, pens. We have been now disconnected from power. This is absolutely psychological warfare, terrorism at its biggest on a family that has just been dedicated to doing everything good to protect Canadian farmers. And do it the right way. We've done it in peace, and love, and solidarity, and going through our proper legal channels. Remember, we have a leave into the supreme court with an emergency stay order impending, and they're still doing this with reconsideration material that they will not acknowledge with our expert witness reports. Just, anyway, a heads up that, yes. So they have now dropped our power as of 04:30 this morning on the side of all the ostriches. Send lots of prayers. We love you very much.

The speaker received a call that a car was found at 30 First, next to their farm, and authorities would be searching the area. They later received a text asking to set up a command unit on the property. The speaker discussed the terrain and buildings on the farm with law enforcement, mentioning an unlocked camper and house. They also informed them about an old, hard-to-access abandoned house on the hill. The speaker and a neighbor told the authorities that the buildings were unlocked. The speaker also heard reports of shots fired early in the morning. A neighbor claimed to have been awakened by a couple of shots while outside late at night.

I arrived 2 hours ago and saw a chaotic scene with cop cars and buses escorted in. Lots of police around. Suddenly everything went dark, then a mysterious event happened. QAnon hinted at something happening in the night sky. I believe people in the White House were arrested.

The narrator hired a new cybersecurity company run by the former CIO of Northrop Grumman, who has “thirty five years in counter espionage specifically for the navy, specifically for advanced propulsion,” and was the chief information officer for Northrop Grumman. The narrator promised the CIO a series of “really crazy ass stories” about electronic and physical surveillance, stalking, and “weird ass death and sexual threats” and asked him to reserve judgment until the end, ready to hear if they were insane or not. The CIO told him, “I wish I could tell you that you were insane, but you're totally not.” He apologized, saying he was trying to let him down gently, and that the stories he’d heard were not unique: “the stories you've told me, I've heard from other young women in technology positions.” They do it “on purpose” to make you feel you can’t tell anyone, and they “pose as, like, agents on their own government.” He urged the narrator to protect herself and to tell others, but he waits until he has five or six “smoking guns” before speaking up.

In Northern California, there are two concerning events. Firstly, the DOJ and FBI are causing issues with forest land. Secondly, a German military defense contractor, known as Society For Aerial Target Display, has brought 16 blue and white fighter jets to California. They usually operate from a German air force base but have been flying off the coast of San Diego for the past 10 to 12 days. Yesterday, they made a detour over Shasta Lake and the Shasta Dam area, which worries locals like me. It's important to note that the government invited these contractors, but their purpose here remains unknown.

Speaker 0: It has come to my attention that there are several flock cameras installed around our town. My resources count over 30 of them, and I have graphics showing where they are. I’d like to be passed around to the guests here tonight so they can see where these cameras are. These cameras utilize AI to track you and your family when you’re out in public. They run by a company Palantir. This company claims that they just record movement of vehicles and they will reduce the crime rate to zero. However, people much more educated than I on these cameras have proven this to be false when speaking to their city councils. They do not monitor where you drive, but they also monitor where you walk, what you do, what you say, what’s on your phone when you walk by, and they spy on you all the time. Today, I walked around and I noticed the one down by the bridge was pointed towards the courtyard and the field, not towards any roads. So why would it be pointed towards the river, not towards the streets if it’s just to monitor vehicles? Also, in order to bring the crime rate down to zero, they would need to be able to predict crime before it happens, and I think that that is a slippery slope. Some cities are discussing adding this AI to police body cameras, which would be constantly monitored by an AI, which would make a judgment call about releasing drones also controlled by this AI. Again, I see it as a very slippery slope along with the military drones that we’ve seen used over in Iran and in Ukraine. That is not my biggest problem with these though. The owner of Palantir, Peter Thiel, is a man mentioned in the Epstein files over 2,200 times, making him the fourth most mentioned individual in the files. He accepted $40,000,000 that we know about from Epstein. The victims of Epstein and Jalane Maxwell were human sex trafficked, reported almost all members consisting of high profile and ultra wealthy individuals, and they witnessed murders, ritual sacrifice, and cannibalism of infants. That being the consumption of human flesh and blood. They used code words for their victims like pizza, jerky, and grape soda. I have a hard time believing that any human being could do something so evil. This is something that I would be told in a story about vampires. And I don’t know about you, but I think that vampires are meant for campfires. They are supposed to be a mythological being, and they’re not supposed to be real and definitely should not be in charge of the security and safety of our city. I believe that any decent person would say no to giving up their safety and security to someone with such little value of a human life, let alone a potential ultra wealthy pedophilic vampire in the Epstein files. So the gazebo is right here. Right? So I’m trying to capture this area where we have people hanging out.

Speaker 0 describes having friends in the US embassy in Belize and knowing what was coming. He says he arranged with the head of security to enter the embassy, but the head of security told him, “we have it from the highest authority. We are not to allow you entry into the US embassy. Understand me.” He asserts, “Who was the highest authority in the state department? Hillary Clinton.” He emphasizes that he is an American citizen with “a fucking American passport,” stating, “I'm sorry. I'm not wanted in America. I've got no crimes in America. Is it not reason to say, I don't think I'm gonna vote for you?” Speaker 1 notes, “And yet you're here now.” Speaker 0 explains that for a month and a half he was on the run. He claims the government wanted to collect him because, after they raided his property in 2012 in the jungle, they shot his dog, abused him, and destroyed “a half million dollars worth of my property over a bogus charge.” He says he was pissed off and then “donated too many secretaries within the government laptop computers, really nice ones that were preloaded with viral spyware.” He contends that within a week, “the entire government computer system was in under my control. I was watching, monitoring, listening.” He continues that he was looking for information that they had set him up for that raid, and he didn’t find that. Instead, he discovered that “the minister of national defense was the largest drug trafficker in all of Central America, and the minister of immigration, the largest human trafficker.” Speaker 1 responds, “We don't wanna get killed by them either, so we're probably not—” and Speaker 0 agrees, “You're not gonna,” adding, “That's fine.”

Last night around 2 AM, I heard a knock at the door and saw three men outside. They were going door-to-door, and I knew who they were and who they were after, so I didn’t answer. I watched as they took people from their homes, mostly my neighbors, who are all Mexican. This morning, the usual five work trucks in the parking lot were reduced to just one. The place feels eerily quiet; I don’t hear my neighbors anymore. I’ve been looking outside, and there’s no one around. It feels like they took my neighbors away, and it’s strange because they usually don’t speak English.

A man in a gray shirt and pants arrived in a Chevy pickup truck, leaving his door open. He approached me, insisting that I needed to leave the area. I was near a picnic table by the fence when he confronted me. He then moved on to two other individuals nearby. It seemed he was the only one driving the truck, which was parked across the property. After a while, he left but returned later before leaving again. I asked about a red pickup truck and mentioned that I was unsure if he had been shot at. He was seen coming down White Star Road, and I was informed that someone would come to take my statement.

A man in a gray shirt and pants arrived in a Chevy pickup truck and told Speaker 0 and others they had to leave. He said he worked for 35 years. The man approached Speaker 0 first, who was by the fence near a picnic table. After speaking to Speaker 0, he moved up the fence toward two other men. The man said no truck was allowed across the property. The truck left, came back, stayed for a while, and then left again. Speaker 1 mentioned Tyler was blowing the roof and that the same car was coming down White Star Road. Speaker 0 didn't know if Tyler was shot at. Speaker 0 is going to get people to take Speaker 1's statement.

I had a strange encounter with two private investigators who visited an old residence of mine. They claimed to be there to discuss my YouTube channel and whether I had received funding for my stories. My friend, who lives there, called me, and I spoke with them directly. They admitted they were investigating influencers on behalf of an undisclosed client, trying to find out if anyone had been paid to discuss Diddy's lawsuits and connections with other celebrities. They mentioned that if I had been paid, they would have offered to pay me to reveal the details and promote a different narrative. It was quite an unexpected and unsettling experience.

That's cop. That's cop. That's cop. That's cop. "Cops are moving in right now." I'm sitting here in the corner watching. "This isn't shift change either, folks." "That happens at 06:00 in the morning and 06:00 at night, but we got all these unmarked here moving in." "We need to call Katie." "It's just about a dozen cops rolled up the road just now towards Edgewood or sorry, towards the farm." "There was a white truck that went in with a bunch of black cases." "This black SUV at the corner there, they just went back in." "And a huge tripod that they seem to be assembling who knows what." "Oh, boy, folks. Okay. I got some work to do, man. I think we gotta get ready."

I filmed an unexplained object in the sky in New Jersey, and the video went viral before being taken down. Shortly after, the FBI visited me and my neighbors to ask about the video. They were polite and asked questions, but their visit was intimidating, especially since my personal information had been doxxed online. This led to a lot of negative attention, and I had to delete all my social media to protect myself and my family. I didn't intend to claim anything about what I saw; I just recorded it. I'm still processing everything that happened, but that's the gist of my experience.

After being elected governor, I was interviewed by 23 CIA members who wouldn't reveal their purpose. They refused to share their names or roles, which was unsettling. They questioned me about my election, and I was struck by the diverse group present, resembling everyday people. We need to engage with those in this field to understand their activities and who they are monitoring. It's important to uncover the extent of surveillance happening.

Everything is blocked off, and there’s a heavy presence of military, police, and FBI agents. It’s strange that we’re being kept out of our own house. Things are definitely getting weird around here in Kelly.

Speaker 0 (anonymous whistleblower): Government seems to be involved. They’re definitely some kind of nonhuman sentience. We’ve recovered the vehicles and have physical proof. I was partially cleared into those activities and had access to the data, reading intelligence reports resulting from those programs. Speaker 1: And with your own eyes you’ve seen it. So when people say this is kooky, there’s nothing to back it up… Speaker 2 (NASA): NASA is open and transparent with our data. Do you believe what Mister David Crush said, or is he lying? Whatever he said, where’s the evidence? Speaker 1: What do you say? Speaker 0: Members of this administration are very aware of this reality; the current president is very knowledgeable on this subject, and I trust his leadership. I think he’s assembled a cabinet, and I believe if Trump wants to be the greatest president and the most consequential leader in world history, he certainly has the knowledge, the capabilities, and understanding of some of these sensitive government transparency issues. Speaker 3: I have access and have spoken to people about it. I’ve had meetings with very smart, solid people who believe there is something out there. It makes sense there could be, but I’ve never been convinced, despite that. It’s not my thing. Speaker 1: So you think, one, he knows, and two, he’s open to transparency on UAPs? He’s very well informed on this issue. Leave it at that. I don’t want to get ahead of what the president might want to reveal. There’s been a role to cover this up through administrations. Speaker 0: I was physically threatened even before I sent in my intelligence community inspector general report under the previous administration. I had to seek legal protection because I was fearful professionally and personally. Speaker 1: And when you mention recovering pilots or remains nonhuman, that’s something you saw in the intelligence with your eyes? Speaker 0: Yes. There were pictures. It’s uncomfortable to discuss because it’s outside a normal worldview to understand there is a biological sentience that piloted these crafts and does not necessarily look 100% like us. Speaker 1: Were there pictures? Speaker 0: There were. Speaker 1: When I said from another planet or outer space, you said you don’t know where they’re from. Is it interdimensional? What are we talking about? Speaker 0: I’ve talked to a lot of graybeards about the origin. I leave an open mind. There is an extraterrestrial hypothesis, and they could be coming from elsewhere off Earth, but I didn’t see that data. I’m not conversant in the high-confidence theories the US government had. I’m not aware of any remains the department has of extraterrestrial beings or technology. Speaker 1: Do other governments know? Do they have programs? Speaker 0: They have their own programs. Two and a half years ago we’ve been in an arms race with peer competitors—Russia and China—and they have their own programs. I viewed a body of intelligence that discussed adversarial programs. Speaker 1: We’ve recovered things—bodies and physical remains. Was there a sense of their motive or whether it’s peaceful or not? We’ve seen a mixed bag of motives. Speaker 0: Activity and motive vary; the reasons for visiting are not fully understood. Could it be because we have interesting genetic material on Earth and we’re a Jurassic Park tourist attraction? There could be a myriad of reasons. Speaker 1: For other people coming forward, what do you say about intimidation? There are reports of harassment. There’s hope. Congress values whistleblower information now, and there’s appetite to do the right thing. There are things happening behind the scenes that the administration may discuss when ready. Speaker 1: We’ll follow every element. It’s fascinating. Speaker 0: Thanks for having me. Speaker 4: Sean Hannity here. Subscribe to Fox News YouTube pay.

After the lockdown, I noticed a large number of police officers in my house. It seemed like they were there to confiscate and remove my belongings.

The speaker describes U.S. surveillance as more advanced than the White House ballroom “underground surveillance center,” claiming that a large-scale system is already deployed and not widely understood enough to stop it. They say they followed the money behind “Flock” after hearing about it. The speaker identifies Flock Cameras as the company behind surveillance cameras (not bird-monitoring game cameras), formed around 2018 by three Georgia Tech students. They claim Flock is deployed across “5,000 towns” with “over 80,000 cameras” in the United States, originally intended to catch crime using license-plate tracing. The speaker then claims that in the past two years Flock added accessories that they describe as “more electric dog collars,” shifting “innocent” crime-capture capabilities into “nefarious” uses. The speaker outlines three parts of the claimed system: 1) Flock cameras mounted on light poles that trace license plates, with added AI capabilities said to include identifying vehicles from “dents,” “scratches,” and “bumper stickers,” and then tracing the car using these features rather than license plates alone. 2) A drone-related capability, attributed to Flock buying a drone company: it is said to hear someone scream or respond to a camera detecting a crime, then automatically deploy a drone that surveils a chase “2,000 feet up in the air.” 3) “Nova,” described as an accessory added to Flock cameras that tracks people and “turns your license plate into everything about you,” including marital status, kids, address, and phone number, plus “pattern of life.” The speaker claims an investigation found Nova pulls data not only from legal/open sources but also from the dark web, including social security numbers, bank information, leaked email, leaked passwords, and other leaked data. They give an example involving a Texas police officer searching a “Flock database” for an abortion-related case and then seeking expansion into states where abortions were legal, after receiving “1800 results.” The speaker then connects the surveillance technologies to specific investors and related companies. They claim Andreas Horowitz is an investor in Flock. The speaker says they recognized Horowitz from research on Ehud Barak and asserts Barak created related companies including “TOCA,” described as technology that can alter live camera footage in real time, add or remove content, create fake footage, and “leave no forensic evidence.” They also claim Barak is connected to “Carbine,” described as a 911 system capable of accessing microphones, cameras, and location. The speaker further claims Horowitz and additional investors link Flock to these technologies through Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund, which they say also invested in Flock and Carbine. The speaker says all these companies connect through large investors and says it enables additional capabilities such as drone use and footage manipulation. They announce “part two,” claiming the next topic is a competitor that previously worked with Flock, branched off, and can track Bluetooth devices, described as linked to an Italian military defense company.

The speaker received a call that a car was found at 30 First, next to their farm, and authorities would be searching the area. They later received a text asking to set up a command unit on the property. The speaker spoke with someone from the BCA who inquired about the terrain and what was on the farm, including a camper and ice house, both of which are unlocked. The speaker and a neighbor informed the BCA about an old, hard-to-access abandoned house up on the hill. The speaker also heard reports of shots fired early in the morning. A neighbor claimed to have been awakened by a couple of shots while outside late at night.

The speaker recounts a long-standing pattern of interactions with federal agents, noting that jokes about agents reading their chats stopped being funny for a period. They describe being pressured to work for these agencies for months, a pressure that left no paper trail and was deliberately concealed. Each time agents visited their home, they were asked to shut off their phone and told not to tell anyone about what was happening. The speaker explains that the only reason they can discuss the situation now is that they made a deliberate, fear-driven decision to do so. They recall sweating and nearly vomiting, and they went so far as to clip a DJI microphone to their bra before every visit, anxious that the device would beep or reveal what was being discussed. This precaution reflects the level of fear and the stakes involved in the interactions. They claim to have later confronted Parliament about the surveillance and pressure campaigns they faced, actions taken after they recorded evidence of these activities. The speaker asserts a broader possibility: there exists a very real world in which they did none of that—where they would still be online today as an independent influencer while privately secretly acting on behalf of Canadian intelligence agencies—because they were made to believe they would go to jail. They emphasize that they are not the only person affected by this dynamic, suggesting a wider pattern or network behind these experiences.

The speaker explains that the government wanted to arrest them after raiding their property and causing damage. In response, the speaker donated laptops with spyware to government secretaries, gaining control over the entire government computer system. They were searching for evidence of being set up but instead discovered that the minister of national defense was involved in drug trafficking and the minister of immigration was involved in human trafficking. The speaker acknowledges the danger of sharing this information and suggests that it is best to keep it undisclosed.

There's a drone hovering over a group of trees, and it's not the same one as before. It's strange how it stays in that spot before moving towards my house and farm. I'm filming this to share on Twitter for others to figure out. The drone is very close, hovering silently, and now it's moving slightly to the left. Suddenly, it appears to be circling back to the other drone still over the trees. Now both drones are in view, and the one that was hovering is coming right towards me. It's flying directly over the cornfield, and I can hear its engine now. What is happening?

I apologize for betraying your trust, but I need to share this information. I run a small bed and breakfast hotel in England. The government asked me to house refugee families, but only men arrived. I received money for this and had to fire my staff. Recently, I received a call about a large parcel, but it didn't arrive until the early morning. I was asked to show the delivery team to a secure room where they unloaded big crates. I was given a smaller parcel with a letter containing names of the refugees and keys with numbers. When I opened two crates, I found AK47 machine guns and explosives. I can't allow these men to have these weapons, so I will move them to a secure garage. I fear the government's plan is to harm innocent people.

Speaker 0: "It could could happen." The speakers discuss: "People are waking up." They allege that "the hay trucks that were bringing the big males in here for them to corral these perverts and then shoot them, they turned around with oil." When asked how they knew about that, one responds: "Just happened. Just happened. Just happened." Another adds: "I seen them drive in here about, two hours or an hour ago, and they woke up." The conversation concludes with the claim that "They got the message, and they've gone home with the trucks."

One little-known aspect of my case involves a federal agent who claimed they intended to plant child pornography on my husband's computer. This was part of an operation by the FBI. In a separate case currently in litigation, an FBI agent has testified that such actions have occurred before, although it didn't happen in our situation. They halted this part of the operation before it could be executed. It's alarming to think about the implications, especially knowing we had a young daughter at home and that there was an alleged conspiracy to carry out such a heinous act.