reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 summarizes the issue with prepackaged ground meat at multiple major retailers, including Kroger, Target, Walmart, Aldi, Food Lion, Piggly Wiggly, Whole Foods, and Fresh Thyme. He states that none of these packages tell you where the meat comes from, where it’s packaged, or what procedures were used to ensure safety. Behind the counter, employees say there’s information on the back to scan with your phone that leads to an FDA website. He claims the FDA website “could either be three d printed” and “could be a how do I put a cloned animal,” and that if that’s a problem, “well, TikTok, you need to check the the FDA website because it says it could be.” He urges caution, concluding with, “Let’s just say this, our food ain't food anymore.”

The speaker discusses the connection between financial control and the food supply, highlighting a push for synthetic lab-grown food controlled by the pharmaceutical industry. They warn against the potential consequences of losing control over transactions, which could lead to mandated consumption of artificial food products. The speaker emphasizes the importance of supporting farmers and fishermen to prevent the mass production of lab-grown meat in manufacturing plants and laboratories.

There is a concerning loophole in the law regarding the food supply. If a cow or pig receives an mRNA gene therapy, they can still be labeled as organic. This means that organic food can potentially contain these therapies. The issue arises if the therapy alters their DNA, can be transmitted to humans, or remains in their system. These factors make it possible for consumers to unknowingly consume these substances in their organic food.

UC Riverside and UC Berkeley have developed vaccines in lettuce and tomatoes, while tobacco companies have done so in tobacco products. The concern is about proper dosing and labeling of these products to ensure consumer safety. The bill aims for transparency in grocery stores selling vaccine-containing produce. The technology is still in development, but the goal is to prevent issues like improper dosing seen in the cattle industry. The discussion highlights the need for consumer awareness and regulation in this emerging field.

The speaker expresses concern over the mandatory electronic ear tag bill in the pharma community and on TikTok. They are puzzled by small-time farmers who support it, believing that it is a Trojan horse to control and put small farmers out of business. They advise always saying no to bills that increase government control and urge listeners to look at who supports the bill to understand its true motivations. The speaker warns against allowing government interference in running businesses and predicts that even if the bill starts as voluntary, it will eventually become mandatory. They encourage contacting representatives and cattlemen's associations to oppose the bill.

Human vaccines can be integrated into foods like lettuce and tomatoes, as demonstrated by research from the University of California Riverside and UC Berkeley. There are concerns about the legality and consumer awareness regarding these products. If a food contains a vaccine, it should be labeled as a pharmaceutical to ensure proper dosage information for consumers. The discussion highlights the importance of transparency in food labeling, especially regarding potential vaccine content. The aim is to prevent issues similar to those seen in the cattle industry, where improper dosing led to resistance. Ultimately, consumers should be informed about what they are purchasing in grocery stores.

Genetically modified food is not labeled in the US due to FDA regulations, as it's considered equivalent to unmodified food. Consumers are kept in the dark about GMO ingredients to prevent confusion. The FDA relies on safety assessments from the patent-holding companies like Monsanto, Pfizer, or Syngenta, without conducting independent studies. FDA scientists have expressed concerns about this practice, urging against allowing GMO foods on the market due to unknown consequences.

A bill in Tennessee proposes labeling food with vaccines, while Idaho has a similar bill. Edible vaccines are being studied at UC Riverside, where scientists are exploring the use of plants like lettuce to produce mRNA vaccines. Traditionally, vaccines are grown in eggs or animal cells, but plant-based vaccines are being developed. Genetic editing is being used to create edible vaccines in plants like bananas, potatoes, tomatoes, lettuce, rice, wheat, soybeans, and corn. Medicago is using gene editing to turn plants into mini bioreactors for vaccine production. There are concerns about mRNA vaccines being used on livestock, with the potential for transference to humans through meat consumption. Transparency laws are being debated to inform consumers about genetically modified products in livestock.

The speaker attempted to defund research on transgenic edible plant vaccines in the ag approves bill, arguing that taxpayer dollars are funding research into vaccines grown in lettuce and spinach. The concern is that people will be vaccinated when they eat these plants. The speaker believes there should be tighter regulations due to the risk of pollen escaping and contaminating neighboring farms that do not intend to grow vaccines in their food. Although the speaker was able to initially stop taxpayer spending on this research in the ag approves bill, the bill was discarded in favor of an omnibus bill, resulting in another year of funding for transgenic edible plant vaccine research.

Speaker 0 explains that the time from hatched egg to market for chickens has dramatically shortened over the years. He notes it was four months when he started fifteen years ago, then eighteen weeks, then sixteen, fourteen, and twelve weeks, and recently reads that organically raised chickens are going to market in eight weeks. He questions how the industry can claim there are no hormones, given these rapid changes. He asserts that the key lies “in the field” and describes the practice of modern farming: a farmer buys fertilized eggs and signs a contract to buy food only from that egg supplier, with big multinational companies involved. He adds that the farmer also signs a contract prohibiting any attempt to find out what is in the food, stating that it is proprietary. He asserts that this lack of disclosure is accepted and enforced by the government. He emphasizes, “We don’t use hormones, but we won’t tell you what we give them,” highlighting a lack of transparency. The overall claim is that the industry maintains there are no hormones, while underlying contracts and proprietary practices control information about the feed, and government support reinforces this arrangement.

The speaker discusses the connection between financial control and food supply control, highlighting the push for synthetic lab-grown food by the pharmaceutical industry. They warn against the potential consequences of losing natural food sources and emphasize the importance of preventing financial transaction control to avoid being forced to consume lab-grown meat. The ultimate goal is to maintain support for farmers and fishermen to prevent the widespread adoption of synthetic food.

Speaker 1 discusses Kerrygold and grass-fed butter, saying Kerrygold is facing heat after admitting their grass-fed cows are fed genetically modified corn and soy for weeks at a time. Speaker 2 adds that one Kerrygold block carries months of industrial residue, and asserts that the grass-fed label is not 100% accurate. The claim continues that for months, these cows are also fed lab-engineered rations, driving inflammatory omega-6s straight into the spread. Speaker 0 notes that when people look at healthy foods like grass-fed butter, they pay more believing it’s better, less inflammatory, with fewer omega-6s. The belief is challenged by the claim that one of the largest suppliers of grass-fed butter is not feeding their cows grass but GMO corn and GMO soy. The discussion labels this as consumer fraud at the highest levels and expresses a wish that the government would take action. Speaker 2 specifies that in 2023 Kerrygold was pulled from shelves for leaching PFA chemicals from the packaging, adding another layer to the controversy. Overall, the speakers allege that Kerrygold’s grass-fed butter involves cows fed GMO corn and soy for extended periods, with cows receiving lab-engineered rations that increase omega-6 inflammatory content, and that the product was retracted in 2023 due to PFA chemicals in the packaging. They frame the situation as consumer fraud tied to premium pricing for grass-fed butter, and call for governmental intervention.

Speaker 0 posits that every time you consume natural flavorings, you could be eating something developed by human fetal cells. They claim that major food companies, including Pepsi, Nestle, and Kraft, have used a biotech company called Cinomics to create flavor enhancers. The disturbing part, they say, is that these artificial flavors were originally tested using HEK293, a cell line derived from aborted fetal tissue, and that due to legal loopholes they don’t have to tell consumers. They insist: natural flavors don’t necessarily come from nature; they can be chemically engineered in a lab using biotech derived from human cells. The explanation provided is that the food industry knows processed food loses its flavor, so instead of relying on real ingredients, they turn to biotech companies to develop flavor enhancers. Ceramics reportedly found that HEK293 cells, originally from fetal tissue, react to flavors like human taste buds, and by testing these flavors on cells, additives were created to make processed food better, allegedly addicting millions of people worldwide. These chemical compounds were then rebranded as natural flavors. Speaker 0 asserts the why behind it: the food industry is described as one giant deceptive machine that uses loopholes to keep consumers in the dark. They claim that today, even natural flavors can contain over 100 synthetic compounds developed using biotech processes that consumers aren’t told about. The overarching claim is that the motive is profit, not health, and that people are the experiment. If this has been hidden for decades, then they ask what else might be hidden, urging listeners to wake up, check labels, and demand transparency. They warn not to trust food giants that profit from deception, arguing that if manipulation of what people eat is possible, it could extend to manipulating how they think and feel. They conclude by stating that the truth is out and invite viewers to share whether they’ve been fooled by natural flavors in the comments.

Florida Governor DeSantis signed a bill banning lab-grown meat in the state. Supporters claim it protects the cattle industry, while opponents argue it stifles innovation and limits consumer choice. Some believe it threatens the free market and is shortsighted. Concerns about lab-grown meat safety were raised, but industry members insist on its safety. Critics accuse Bill Gates of driving up land prices and hurting farmers, urging support for traditional farming over fake meat.

"They just slipped fake fish onto your plate, and Jeff Bezos is backing it." "This lab grown salmon approved by the FDA as safe is grown entirely from fish cells in stainless steel tanks, fed a nutrient formula, and molded into fillets that look just like the real thing." "Supporters claim it's sustainable and cruelty free, but the money trail shows billionaires like Bezos are pouring millions into replacing wild caught and farm raised fish with fully synthetic alternatives, shifting control of the food supply from fishermen and farmers to biotech labs." "The USDA's approval means these products can now quietly enter US restaurants without special labeling, meaning you could already be eating it without knowing." "The question isn't if it replaces your dinner, it's how fast."

This bill aims to ensure transparency and informed consent regarding gene therapy products and other medical interventions. It requires products potentially acting as gene therapy to be labeled accordingly, and information about potential exposure and shedding to be disclosed. The bill also emphasizes the importance of fully informed consent, including awareness of benefits, risks, and side effects. However, lobbyists, including those representing big pharma and agribusiness, are opposing the bill. The speaker urges support for the bill and criticizes those who oppose transparency and consumer knowledge. The bill's passage would reveal important information about adverse events and the use of gene therapy and mRNA vaccines in food.

A speaker discusses genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and the debate surrounding their safety, mentioning a petition signed by 17 Nobel laureates asserting their safety. The speaker says that while millions have consumed GMOs without apparent harm, the context is important. The speaker explains that GMOs are often engineered to resist glyphosate, and glyphosate is used heavily. Glyphosate is described as an antibiotic, patented for antibiotic use, that kills microbiota around plants. The speaker claims that glyphosate is the most prescribed antibiotic on Earth, especially in rice farming, and that the consequences of its widespread use are unknown.

We are unaware of what we are consuming in our food supply. Merck has been injecting mRNA into pigs since 2018, creating transmissible mRNA that can be passed on to those who consume it. Without informed consent laws, those who have refused mRNA vaccines may unknowingly receive them through their food. This technology could be used in plants and animals, leading to unintended vaccination through food consumption.

The speaker asserts that every time people consume natural flavorings, they may be eating something developed by human fetal cells. They claim that some of the biggest food companies, including Pepsi, Nestle, and Kraft, have used a biotech company called Cinomics to create flavor enhancers. The speaker emphasizes that these artificial flavors were originally tested using HEK293, a cell line derived from aborted fetal tissue, and that due to legal loopholes, companies do not have to disclose this information. They repeat that natural flavors do not necessarily come from nature; they can be chemically engineered in a lab using biotech derived from human cells. The explanation continues with a description of how the process works: the food industry knows that processed food loses flavor, so rather than using real ingredients, biotech companies are brought in to develop flavor enhancers. Ceramics (likely a misspoken or misnamed term) is cited as identifying that HEK293 cells, derived from fetal tissue, react to flavors like human taste buds. By testing flavors on these cells, additives were created to improve the flavor of processed food, allegedly addicting millions of people worldwide. The speaker claims that these chemical compounds were rebranded as natural flavors. The broader assertion is that the food industry operates as a large deceptive machine, using loopholes to keep consumers uninformed. The message is that even natural flavors can contain over 100 synthetic compounds developed via biotech processes that consumers are not told about. The speaker claims the issues are driven by profit rather than health, and that people are the experiment. They ask what else has been hidden if this has been kept secret for decades, urging listeners to wake up, check labels, and demand transparency. The speaker warns against trusting food giants that profit from deception, arguing that if they can manipulate what people eat, they can manipulate how people think and feel. The speaker ends by declaring that the truth is out and invites the audience to share whether they have been fooled by natural flavors in the comments.

The speaker discussed a bill granting pesticide companies immunity from lawsuits, which passed a subcommittee. The bill aims to protect companies like Bayer, who spend billions fighting lawsuits. However, only 1% of Bayer's suits come from Iowa farmers. The speaker believes it's unfair to prioritize industry over farmers' rights to legal action.

Lobbyists for cattlemen and pork associations will use mRNA COVID vaccines on livestock. Attorney Tom Rens warns there are no laws requiring informed consent for vaccinated food, nor are there laws requiring disclosure of food being vaccinated with the spike protein clot shot. The UK passed the Genetic Technology Precision Breeding Bill of 1990 to exclude references to precision bred organisms, another term for gene edited. Gene edited food can be legally marketed in the UK and can be labeled non-GMO in America. If butchered in America, it can be labeled Product of USA.

Speaker emphasizes 'no interference in research' and urges that 'this government or who or we, the people, stand up for, you know, righteous research and no retraction of data and no interference in research.' They argue that while the public may be educated by podcasts, 'doctors, the scientists are gonna be educated by watching by reading the data.' Addressing labeling, they state that 'mislabeling that that, the the labels that mislead the consumers, we're never gonna fix our micro I agree.' They reference Kennedy, saying 'Kennedy's saying it's propaganda. This research has been basically propaganda. And, now, hopefully, he's going to put an end to it, but it's a it's a long row.'

The speaker claims mRNA is in the food supply. Merck has been injecting mRNA into pigs since 2018 with a product called Sequebiti. They claim to be able to make transmissible mRNA, meaning they can put it in an animal so that it transmits to whoever is ingesting it, effectively vaccinating them. The speaker suggests this could be engineered into plants and animals. Without informed consent laws, people who refused mRNA vaccines may get them through their food.

A congressman from Kentucky opposes funding for transgenic, edible vaccines. He argues that taxpayer money is being used to study the possibility of turning plants like lettuce and spinach into mRNA vaccine factories. He believes this is a bad idea and that the American people should not be funding it. He mentions a previous incident where corn contaminated soybeans, leading to a recall and destruction of crops. He expresses concerns about the safety of genetically modified food and the potential for unintended consequences. The congressman urges adoption of his amendment to stop funding this research. The amendment is ultimately agreed to.

Hospital 1169 requires disclosure of gene therapy qualities in products, discusses transmission of gene therapy aspects, and mandates informed consent. However, there is opposition to the bill, particularly from big pharma and agricultural lobbyists. Research reveals that vaccines may be integrated into foods, with a product called Seqevity already on the market. This technology could potentially transmit mRNA gene therapies from animals to humans. Concerns arise due to the removal of country of origin labels on food products, making it uncertain if this practice is already happening in the United States. Opposition to the bill comes from companies like Bayer Monsanto, who are incorporating gene therapy into seeds and livestock. The fight against informed consent is puzzling.