reSee.it - Related Video Feed

It were me, a 100% of my red money would go into jay proof. A 100% of it. You've got a dev sitting here with his face on the screen every day telling you he's never gonna sell a penny and who never has. Who admits to mistakes when they were made like the market maker, Gambling on some shitcoin. Big mistake. Market maker. Gone. Dealt with.

I want you to know that everything will be shared on social media. I have twenty thousand followers myself. The money is there, look, the money is right there.

The Pentagon hides billions of dollars, with no accountability or audits. We've never received a satisfactory explanation. To uncover the truth, someone will likely have to leak information online before being silenced—a scenario I've often predicted.

I now see how committed and dedicated Stu Peters is, and inevitably, this thing is gonna rocket into the billions. It's Jew proof. It's Jeep proof. I made a bunch of money. I should have never got out. Well, guess what? It's not too late. It's going into the billions. This is going to be the coin that people regret not buying. Mark my words. Guess what? You have that opportunity. This thing is going into the billions. A dollar for this thing, inevitable, very soon. Very soon, this thing is gonna go to a dollar. We have a coin that's right now worth 7 or 8¢. That's insane.

The Brooklyn Bridge is crashing. Sales are hitting great. Something is going on.

Lies about Jay Proof, including claims of 271,000 and 6,000,000 falsehoods, are being spread by a foreign-born Italian who is cosplaying as white and has teamed up with Jews. This individual has announced meetings with billionaire Jews with the expressed intent of attacking the speaker, the network, and Jay Proof. All of these lies can be easily discredited because Jay Proof is a cryptocurrency meme coin, and everything is on the blockchain.

On 03/26/2026, the Pentagon's Strategic Capabilities Office (SCO) quietly announced BIOW, basic information awareness operations, a cognitive warfare program that changes the rules of the battlefield through belief rather than bullets or bombs. The SCO sits inside the Office of the Secretary of Defense, with a mandate to deliver breakthrough capabilities to war fighters typically within three to five years. Sam Gray, SCO's chief technology officer and lead for autonomy and artificial intelligence, leads BIOW. Speaking at the National Defense Industrial Association's Pacific Operational Science and Technology Conference in Honolulu, Gray stated: the goal of cognitive warfare is to disrupt the cognition and the thinking ability of an adversary or person and influence how they perceive, sense make, and act. This is not propaganda in the old sense. This is something fundamentally different. For most of military history, influence operations required a physical observable. In World War Two, the Allies inflated fake tanks to fool German reconnaissance. You needed something the enemy could see. Gray said that era is over. Quote, I don't actually need the physical observable because I can generate both the physical observable and the associated narrative that comes along with it, and I can promulgate it across the digital environment that allows it to go everywhere. BIOW. BIOW is built on three technological pillars. Pillar one, detection: systems designed to identify adversary generated materials to see what the enemy is pushing into the information space before it takes hold. Pillar two, multimodal effects: AI models capable of generating text, video, and audio, synthetic content designed to shape how target populations perceive events in real time. Pillar three, population modeling: a large scale simulation environment that can model entire populations and produce quantitative metrics. Answering the question Sam Gray himself asked, how good am I doing with this narrative? Did it resonate like we thought it was going to? The technology architecture Gray described is deliberately lean and distributed. Quote, give me 100 Mac minis with 100 different agents on them that are out running and operating, that are lightweight, small, do not require gigawatts of power. This is not a massive fragile supercomputer. This is a swarm. But there's a problem Gray openly acknowledged: the off the shelf AI systems we all use, ChatGPT, Gemini, do not think like Russia. They do not think like China. They were trained on American data shaped by American assumptions. Gray said directly, we have to get to a point where we can understand what it is that they think about and what we can create from a model perspective to emulate and behave like our adversary does. BIOW's goal is to build bespoke AI models specifically tuned to adversary cognitive frameworks. Why is this urgent? Gray pointed to two ongoing adversary campaigns as evidence: The United States is already behind. First, Iran's information operations during Operation Epic Fury. Second, China's large scale efforts to, in Gray's words, change the way that certain populations are thinking. And then Gray stated plainly, The United States is not currently positioned to counter these operations at machine speed. Quote, we need to start to get into that space. Congress didn't wait. The 2026 National Defense Authorization Act directed the Secretary of Defense to formally define cognitive warfare for the department, assign organizational responsibility, and assess the value of narrative intelligence with a deadline of 03/31/2026. BIOW does not operate in isolation. In 2025, the US Army created Detachment 201, the Executive Innovation Corps, commissioning four Senior Silicon Valley technology executives directly into the Army Reserve at the rank of Lieutenant Colonel: Andrew Bosworth, Kevin Weil, Shyam Sankar, and Bob McGrew. They wear the uniform and serve within the chain of command. Together, BIOW's technology stack and Detachment 201's Silicon Valley expertise represent a deliberate convergence of artificial intelligence, influence operations, and military command structure. NATO's chief scientist framed the stakes: cognitive warfare targets trust networks, identity narratives, and institutional legitimacy. The battle space is continuous, operates below the threshold of armed conflict, and the measure of success is not a message received, but a durable change in how a population thinks, decides, and acts. The human mind is now a contested domain. As of April 2026, BIOW is active: performers are being on-ramped, models are being built, simulations are running. And Gray made one thing clear about the vendors chosen to build this system: those who don't keep up will be cut. Quote, I will offramp you. The battle for cognition has begun. Whether you believe this program is an essential shield against adversary manipulation or a capability that raises profound questions about who defines the adversary and where those tools can be aimed, one fact is not in dispute. This is real. It is funded. It is operational. And you are now aware.

We need to expand our support to make a significant impact, even if it means spending millions of dollars. This amount is small compared to the billions at stake in this game. My goal is to convey this message while fundraising and talking to the community. We aim to demolish everything, seize their assets, and see what results from that. However, this task has not been easy or smooth.

100% of my money would go into Jay Proof. The dev is present daily and claims he has never sold and never will. He admits to mistakes, such as the market maker gambling on a shitcoin, which was dealt with. Everything I do is to bolster this token.

- The speaker explains mark-to-market profits from a given amount of gold, using a simple example: 50 ounces of gold, gold rises by $1,000 per ounce, yielding $50,000 in profit; another $1,000 rise yields another $50,000, and so on. People think in terms of the thousand-dollar increments and the real money those increments represent. - However, each $1,000 increment becomes easier to achieve as the price base rises, because the percentage gain shrinks. Example progression: - From $2,000 to $3,000 per ounce: 50% gain. - From $3,000 to $4,000 per ounce: 33% gain. - From $4,000 to $5,000 per ounce: 25% gain. - From $9,000 to $10,000 per ounce: 11% gain. - From $19,000 to $20,000 per ounce: 4% gain. - Thus, the same $50,000 profit corresponds to smaller percentage gains as the price rises. The point is that benchmarks at thousand-dollar steps get easier to reach over time, and the market can move to higher levels more quickly than people expect. - The speaker notes that, while these benchmarks are real money and meaningful, the relative difficulty of achieving each increment decreases as the base price grows, implying faster potential moves to new high levels (e.g., reaching $20,000 an ounce) than audiences might anticipate.

It were me, a 100% of my red money would go into jay proof. A 100% of it. You've got a dev sitting here with his face on the screen every day telling you he's never gonna sell a penny and who never has. Who admits to mistakes when they were made like the market maker, Gambling on some shitcoin. Big mistake. Market maker. Gone. Dealt with.

We can't track $2.3 trillion in transactions. That's two trillion, three hundred billion dollars.

Nobody had advanced knowledge of the launch. I mean, that's what insider trading is. Nobody, absolutely nobody besides myself and Andrew, knew that J Proof was even a thing until after the launch, thereby negating any claims of insider wallets. Anybody can buy these things immediately when they hit the blockchain.

We need to expand our support to make a significant impact, even if it means spending millions of dollars. This amount is small compared to the billions at stake for those involved. I'm conveying this message in my fundraising efforts. Our goal is to demolish everything, seize their assets, and see what happens. However, this task has not been easy so far.

But of all of the red money or crypto or meme coin investments, it's my personal opinion that J proof is the most solid. And all of that, again, the evidence of that is available on the blockchain where you can see what the dead wallet holds, what the dead wallet started with, how I have continued to pour LP rewards back onto the chart, not taking any money for myself. It's not a get rich quick scheme. Never has been. It's a long term play. You should be less concerned about the dollar value of your J proof wallet as you are concerned with the amount of J proof tokens that you are holding.

But of all of the red money or crypto or meme coin investments, it's my personal opinion that J proof is the most solid. And all of that, again, the evidence of that is available on the blockchain where you can see what the dev wallet holds, what the dev wallet started with, how I have continued to pour LP rewards back onto the chart, not taking any money for myself. It's It's not a get rich quick scheme. Never has been. It's a long term play. You should be less concerned about the dollar value of your J proof wallet as you are concerned with the amount of J proof tokens that you are holding.

I now see how committed and dedicated Stu Peters is, and inevitably, this thing is gonna rocket into the billions. "It's Jew proof. It's Jeep proof." "I made a bunch of money. I should have never got out." "Well, guess what? It's not too late." "It's going into the billions. This is going to be the coin that people regret not buying. Mark my words." If you missed out on Bitcoin all those years back and you're like, man, I had the opportunity, I thought about it. "Guess what? You have that opportunity." "This thing is going into the billions." "A dollar for this thing, inevitable, very soon." "Very soon, this thing is gonna go to a dollar." "We have a coin that's right now worth 7 or 8¢. That's insane." But because people got that shock of the 200,000,000, they expect that green candle to just keep going up and up and

It were me, a 100% of my red money would go into jay proof. A 100% of it. You've got a dev sitting here with his face on the screen every day telling you he's never gonna sell a penny and who never has. Who admits to mistakes when they were made like the market maker, Gambling on some shitcoin. Big mistake. Market maker. Gone. Dealt with.

"It's not what this is. We can get into that. But that's what these people did. They bought in at $200,000,000, and now they're freaking out because we're rock solid at, well, now approaching $70,000,000 market cap value. It's a ticking time bomb." They predict: "This is gonna go to billions. The Jews can't fuck with it. The Jeets can't control it. Nobody can control it." "Screen record what I'm saying right now." They add: "They can lie about us. They can talk shit about us. I'm ignoring the noise, and I'm looking at the zoomed out view of this chart."

"They bought in at $200,000,000, and now they're freaking out because we're rock solid at, well, now approaching $70,000,000 market cap value." "It's a ticking time bomb." "You never know when this thing is gonna go to a billion. It's going. Inevitably, it's gonna go into the multibillions. That's what's gonna happen with this coin. Mark my words." "Screen record what I'm saying right now." "This is gonna go to billions." "The Jews can't fuck with it. The Jeets can't control it. Nobody can control it." They can lie about us. They can talk shit about us. I'm ignoring the noise, and I'm looking at the zoomed out view of this chart."

Speaker 0: I had a guy who worked, very, very, very high up at Citibank. And he told me around 2008, he said, Glenn, you know, don't worry about the financial system. And I'm like, uh-huh. And he said, you know, we're never gonna go broke. I mean, do you know how much just the national parks are worth? And I looked at him and said, are you seriously telling me that we should commoditize the national parks? And he said, it's gonna happen. And I wonder now if this is what he was talking about. If it was just a digital not actually selling them, it's just a digital commoditization of our parks. Speaker 1: Yeah. So apply this now to the the phrase that we all heard during the COVID era, you'll own nothing and be happy. Well Yes. There's certain people that want to own everything, and that includes things that have never been able to be owned before that were considered things like the public commons, like rivers, lakes, the ocean itself, natural forests, all sorts of it. These people want to put all of that into the financial system, fractionalize it, tokenize it, and sell pieces of it around, use it to speculate on. Mean, it's It's very insane. Yeah. And so, this is just one aspect of digital currency play. Obviously, there's a lot more than that just going on as well. I would argue that a lot of this push, particularly in The US for dollar stablecoins supposedly being better than a central bank digital currency, also falls into this paradigm we talked about earlier of, you know, moving from the public to the private of the public private partnership because a lot of these stablecoin issuers, you know, if the the big concerns about CBDCs was that they're seasable, they're surveillable and they're programmable, Well, all of those three things also can apply to stablecoins. The only difference is that you would have a private company issue it and control it. But we've seen time and again how a lot of these private entities are willing to do that. When contacted, just look at how Bank of America behaved with January 6, people accused of wrongdoing on that day, for You know, they have no qualms in doing that and engaging in those type of activities. And the biggest dollar stablecoin issuer, Tether, which just hired Bo Hynes from the White House, they have openly said that they are a close partner of the US government for dollar hegemony globally and have uploaded the FBI, the Secret Service and other aspects of the US government onto its platform directly and have seized tethers from people just because government told them to, and this was during the Biden administration. So they obviously are willing to do that under any administration, and it's essentially functioning as a de facto public private partnership, even though we're being told it's a it's much better than a CBDC, but in terms of its impacts on civil liberties, you know, that's not necessarily true. So, again, vigilance is is important here.

We are discussing reaching the wall. Watch this.

The Brooklyn Bridge is crashing. Sales are hitting great. Something is going on.