reSee.it - Related Video Feed

- Speaker 0 expresses a core problem: how to support the Donald Trump presidency when the figures associated with his circle (Alex Jones, Owen Shroyer, Ian Carroll) embody traits they oppose, prompting questions about alignment with their side. He asks how to reconcile supporting Trump with these associations, calling it an objective problem. - Speaker 1 responds that he has not researched certain controversial items (Eric Prince’s phone) and notes that Eric Prince is a polarizing figure from the military-industrial complex world. He argues that involvement in war fighting does not automatically make someone evil and that a full picture requires digging beyond initial impressions, acknowledging he hasn’t done all the research. - Speaker 0 challenges this, citing his own video: Eric Prince has three CEOs for Blackwater, all with intricate ties to the IDF. He questions coincidence between Palantir Technologies and the surveillance state, Israel’s influence, and three IDF-affiliated Blackwater CEOs, referencing USS Liberty and suggesting Eric Prince’s past atrocities and a lack of accountability. He asks whether such a figure could ever be considered a good person and whether repentance is possible, noting he hasn’t seen Prince acknowledge past wrongs. - Speaker 0 adds BlackRock as another easy target, claiming BlackRock, with help from the Trump administration, bought two ports in the Panama Canal for $22.8 billion, and contends Trump mentioned a company would buy the Panama Canal during the State of the Union, but did not name BlackRock. He challenges the listener to consider whether Trump is on their side given this nugget of information. - Speaker 1 says he was not endorsing a specific device or action, calling the “phones” comment offhand and irrelevant. He reiterates he isn’t waiting for Trump or Elon Musk to act in the interest of people, and states he’s intentionally not waiting for them to do so. He emphasizes starting change bottom-up, and encourages starting conversations rather than trolling, suggesting Seven Seas could help. - Speaker 0 shifts to a broader miscommunication problem: there’s a gap where people misread each other, treating allies as enemies. He advocates filling this gap through dialogue with diverse figures like Seven Seas, Ian Carroll, Joe Rogan, Whitney Webb, Derek Brose. He mentions a planned March sit-down interview between Derek Brose and Ian Carroll, hoping for a productive exchange, while noting past heated exchanges where ad hominem attacks diminished constructive dialogue. He cites Clint Russell and redheaded libertarian as examples of contentious interactions. - They discuss disagreements over Trump’s ideology and policies, including concerns that Trump still praises the VA, pharma, and large-scale spending, which confounds libertarian critiques. He cites a national debt comparison between Obama and Trump era spending, arguing that debt devalues the dollar and harms Americans, regardless of party. - Speaker 0 reiterates suspicion that the criticism of Trump and Elon Musk coexists with perceived support for them, labeling it an inconsistency. He promises to withhold calling someone a shill until there is clear intent to deceive. Speaker 1 suggests focusing on good-faith arguments, mentioning Glenn Greenwald with respect, and invites Seven Seas to share their take on Ian Carroll’s reaction to Seven Seas’ post.

Speaker 0 suggests Speaker 1 is aligned with President Trump and has identified over $100 billion in government waste, fraud, and abuse. Speaker 1 responds that people whose fraudulent money is taken away get upset and want to harm him and Tesla because he is stopping government corruption. He attributes this to "bad people" doing "bad things." Speaker 0 expresses concern that those hurt by these actions will be dealership employees and Tesla factory workers, which he finds despicable due to perceived political differences.

Speaker 0 questions why Eric Adams would allow something to happen to Trump if Trump is helping him and is his ally. Speaker 0 states they have accumulated a preponderance of evidence. Speaker 1 says they are going to the Elon Musk protest and are wearing a blue jacket. Speaker 1 says they didn't think about the color until that moment.

The speaker, when asked about their message to Elon Musk while holding a flag, stated, "You wanna repeat history then get in the basket." Regarding firebombing of Teslas, the speaker responded, "I mean, the French do it." When asked if Elon Musk is a Nazi, the speaker claimed, "He did the slew," and affirmed that they believe he is literally a Nazi. The speaker supports boycotting Tesla. They were then asked if they think it's ironic that climate activists are boycotting the most popular EV in America. The speaker revealed the phone number they were holding is the hotline for Legal Aid in NYC, "just in case" anything goes wrong during protests. They stated that most protests they attend are permitted, with police present to protect both protesters and the public.

Speaker 0 suggests Trump's history of targeting businesses and leaders who he perceives as political enemies should make him "radioactive" to the business world. Speaker 1 notes that, with the exception of Elon Musk, few CEOs of large companies publicly support Trump, fearing retribution. Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 to elaborate on a statement that some business leaders support Trump because they believe they can manipulate him. Speaker 1 explains that these leaders see the relationship as transactional, believing they can influence policy with the right amount of money, citing crypto as an example.

Speaker 1 says that the real information about the Epstein files has not come out and that “there were only four Republicans, four of us that’s really fought to get them released,” who “signed the discharge petition, went against the White House,” and were “threatened,” with Donald Trump calling him a traitor and saying his friends would be hurt. He questions why anyone would vote for Republicans if the administration doesn’t release all the information, framing it as a line in the sand for many people. Speaker 0 asks why they think the Epstein files are being hidden. Speaker 1 responds that it’s because the hidden information would protect “some of the most rich, powerful people,” arguing that Epstein was “definitely some sort of part of the intelligence state” who was “working with Israel” and with the “former prime minister of Israel.” He asserts that these are “the dirty parts of government and the powers that be that they don’t want the American people to know about.” He concludes that, sadly, he doesn’t think the files will come out. Speaker 0 presses on whether Trump is in the Epstein files. Speaker 1 speculates that if someone is “living under blackmail” or “living under threat” and told not to release information, that fear could influence actions. He suggests that someone might be warned by threats to prevent disclosure, giving a hypothetical example: after standing on a rally stage, you could be shot in the ear and warned that “next time we won’t miss,” or that the bullet might be for someone you care about. He says he is “speculating,” but notes he has “a strong enough reason to speculate like that.”

Speaker 1 is asked about their previous tweets regarding Trump and Brian Kemp stealing elections. Speaker 1 dismisses the comparison as ridiculous and clarifies that they were referring to the threat to voting rights at that time.

Donald Trump posted a picture of Judge James Blasberg standing next to Doug Emhoff, Kamala Harris's husband. The speaker questions the coincidence, suggesting it's suspicious. The speaker identifies Blasberg as "third from the right" in the photo, with Emhoff to his right. The speaker alleges that Blasberg, a federal court judge, consistently blocks Donald Trump's actions. The speaker believes it's not coincidental that Blasberg is friends with Emhoff, the former Vice President's husband, and calls it "deep state" activity. The speaker asks viewers for their opinions.

**Speaker 0:** Why is Elon Musk criticized while George Soros, who influences government decisions and backs progressive prosecutors, is not? Is this hypocrisy? **Speaker 1:** Absolutely. Elon's actions are heroic. He's bringing transparency to the federal government and the "deep state." I told him that his work can restore the original intent of the Constitution. Congress has struggled to oversee the bureaucracy because it has not been provided key information. Now, Elon is revealing things we suspected but couldn't prove. This is revolutionary and will restore the government to its intended form. That's why big government advocates are afraid; it's exciting for the people. **Speaker 0:** If you love the country and the Constitution, you are supporting this effort. Thank you. **Speaker 1:** Thanks. Great to be here.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss whether arrests will occur under Trump and how they might be framed. - Speaker 0 asks if arrests will happen under Trump and if figures like Bill Clinton or Obama will be arrested, suggesting that any arrests might be part of “dark handing the keys off to the light” and that the deep state would sacrifice some players. - Speaker 1 responds by outlining alleged close connections: Trump was one of Epstein’s closest friends; Howard Letnick was Epstein’s neighbor; the first lady was Epstein’s girlfriend. He argues that Epstein’s relationship to Israel and the Mossad, and the president’s loyalty to Israel, are significant, and contends that many would say this loyalty goes beyond the United States. He adds a dismissive remark that the other speaker is “smoking dope.” - Speaker 0 contends there will be arrests but believes they will be for optics to bolster support for Trump, implying the releases would be to energize followers and that “deep state players” will be sacrificed. - Speaker 1 refers to certain individuals as “chew toys,” naming Fauci and Gates, suggesting they are used as targets or distractions. He reiterates skepticism that any arrests have occurred so far, noting that Trump has been in power for a year and there hasn’t been an arrest. - The conversation touches on the speed of data-center-related actions and mentions “Stargate” as part of what Trump did, implying rapid actions or moves on day one.

Speaker 0 admits that the other person was right about something, but couldn't say much. They talk about making a film and how it's all fake. They mention not having their name or face on Instagram. Speaker 0 talks about wearing a Trump hat and attending a Trump rally during the daytime. They mention being a journalist and using a camera to record.

Speaker 0 asks Christopher if he will vote in the 2024 presidential race and shares their belief that their vote is useless. They express their preference for Biden over Trump due to Biden's support for Ukraine. Speaker 1 repeats the phrase "Come in this position" multiple times. They also mention something about a tattoo.

Speaker 0 asks if Democrats risk playing into the president's hands by focusing on the Kilmaro Burgo Garcia case. Speaker 1 responds that they don't know of any Democrat who defended Garcia. They claim Garcia was falsely arrested and removed from the country. They allege "they" are making up things about Garcia, such as associating him with MS 13 or claiming he coordinated the January 6 attack, even though he has never been prosecuted or convicted of any crime.

Speaker 0 says they are hot and can't see the police lines. They tell others to keep their eyes open for Antifa, stating that Antifa is all over. Speaker 0 asks where Rico is and then says they see him. Speaker 0 asks if Trump is still walking here. Speaker 1 says "they're suiting up." Speaker 0 says that "they're gonna trap everyone in."

Speaker 0 claims the Department of Government Efficiency found hundreds of billions in fraud, but Speaker 1 denies any fraud was found. Speaker 0 alleges Social Security is paying people over 220 years old, which Speaker 1 disputes. Speaker 1 criticizes Trump's anti-immigrant stance and calls Musk a "thug." Speaker 0 defends Trump, suggesting he might be the greatest president in modern American history. Speaker 1 calls Speaker 0 "deluded" for supporting Trump, characterizing Trump as rude, nasty, and racist. Speaker 0 accuses others of being in a cult, claiming they try to stop people from talking to those with different ideas. Speaker 0 says things got "hot" and troopers asked him to leave. Speaker 0 then shares the speech he planned to give, emphasizing that all are Americans with First Amendment rights and should unite to eliminate corruption.

Speaker 0 mentions feeling like a dog catcher and going to formation for president twice. Speaker 1 interrupts, wanting to discuss Jeffrey Epstein, but Speaker 0 refuses, saying they are walking and feeling sad about it.

The speakers are asked what makes Trump a fascist. One speaker says Trump "just does everything he wants" and is a "convicted felon." Another speaker claims Trump is trying to control the media narrative, citing the renaming of the Gulf of Mexico and allegedly not allowing the Associated Press into the White House. When asked if renaming the Gulf of Mexico is pointless, the speaker agrees. The speakers are asked again what makes Trump a fascist. One speaker says a core tenet of fascism is creating an enemy. The speaker admits they received the sign and talking points from someone else. They say they came out to protest because of executive overreach.

Are you on my side? Trump wants us all to bow to him, but we want him in jail. Also, Musk wants to rescue these government gremlins from working underground.

I am here to support President Trump because he has been unfairly targeting black men for years with false charges. I believe Trump is innocent and I stand with him against the corrupt justice system. As a black man, I proudly wear my "Niggas for Trump 2024" shirt. When asked about the indictment, I think it's all nonsense.

Speaker 0: How was your weekend? You probably watched football, picked pumpkins, spent time with your family. Trump spent his weekend demolishing the East Wing to make room for a big beautiful ballroom. Vance hung out with the marines at Camp Pendleton. Speaker 1: Who rah, marines? Who rah. I didn't hear you. Who rah, marines? Who rah. Speaker 0: Look up in the sky. It's a bird. It's a plane. It's the Secretary of War. Pete spent the weekend doing flyovers and fighter jets. Oh, it was also No Kings Day. Speaker 2: Here in the friendly neighborhood Burger King, enjoying my No Kings Day, with some traditional flame broiled goodness in my hand right now. Like it says right there, if you're heading to Eli Grody, you rule America. We don't have a king in this country. We've got a president. He's doing a pretty darn good job. Speaker 0: Now if you don't know what no kings day is, you're not alone. Maybe you went downtown and got stuck in traffic and wondered, is that a transgender shark? Speaker 3: Why are you here today? Speaker 4: I'm here to stand up against our regimes oppression against the American people and immigrants in our country and minorities, including trans people like myself. Speaker 5: I am the unity uniform. I've got my head out of my costume because I can't breathe right now, but we're here doing a peaceful protest, trying to get our democracy back. Speaker 0: Spartacus and Pencil Neck didn't dress up as trans sharks and unicorns. This is what they really look like. Speaker 1: This is what democracy looks like. This is what democracy looks like. This is what democracy looks like. This is what democracy looks like. Speaker 0: Are they dating? We don't know, but they were hugging and singing on a parade float. In Chicago, Ribs got his steps in. JB back at the Windy City doing the electric slide. You know who can't move her hips like that? Nancy. Poor thing. But she was still tearing it up. Speaker 5: Gonna tear up the crown. Speaker 0: Schumer marched too. Schumer and Pelosi, that king and queen have been ruling America for a combined eighty two years. Trump's only been king for a minute. No Kings was a who's who of people with TDS. Even my mom was there. George Conway was walking around in an Antifa shirt. Irish Rosie must have had FOMO, but don't worry, Hollywood was in the house. Here's John Cusack. Speaker 6: Go to hell. Speaker 3: Is that the message from Chicago? Speaker 6: Yes. What's interesting is that he he doesn't understand that all the labor rights around the world came from this town, this place. So if he thinks this place is gonna be a fascist hub, no chance. Speaker 0: Dougie Not So Fresh was there too, but that kinda looked more like the women's march. Doug was on the prowl. He was going stag. Where's Kamala? Speaker 7: So get out there and join the No Kings event near you, and please take care. I'll see you later. Speaker 0: Kamala couldn't make it. She had other plans, big birthday plans. It's always about her. You know who else was a no show? Hillary. Trump world says, no queens. As for a king, the White House told MSNBC this about the march. Who cares? Do the people even know what they're protesting? Speaker 3: I was wondering how president Trump has put your your freedom in jeopardy. Speaker 1: I wanted to say my freedom is in jeopardy. Speaker 3: So whose freedoms and why are you out here at the no kings protest, I guess? Speaker 0: No one really thinks Trump's king. It just seems like it because he works harder than Biden. Speaker 8: I'm not a king. I work my ass off to make our country great. That's all it is. I'm not a king at all. Speaker 0: If Trump was king, there'd be no march, no MSNBC calling him Nazi, and no shutdown. The funny thing is the left actually loves the government telling them what to do. During the pandemic, Democrat kings and queens told you to close your business, what to wear on your face, how far away you could stand next to someone. They told you couldn't have grandma over for Thanksgiving and liberals obeyed. They took away your first amendment rights and democrats said, good, free speech is dangerous. They tried to take away your second amendment right, democrats said, good, no one needs a rifle. There's nothing the left loves more than submitting to government power. But Robert De Niro says, if you love freedom, you're a brainwashed hick. Speaker 9: Somewhere way out in the Midwest, somewhere out in out West, in certain places, the rural places. That's the truth. Because he gets the airtime. I think that we need more airtime. Just more push against and not I wish that you can't do this in some ways, but that the the news media could find ways to kind of ignore or tamp down nonsense from Trump. Speaker 0: The Democrat party rigged the primary, stole Biden's votes, crowned Kamala, and tried to put their rival in prison. And if you were a reporter who told the truth about Biden, they'd cut off your access. Trump talks to the press every day. Would a king do that? And if the press broke a mirror in the map room, would he let him live? Speaker 8: Oh, you gotta watch that. Watch that. You you're not allowed to break that. That mirror is 400 years old. The camera just hit the mirror. I just moved it up here special from the vaults, and the first thing that happens, the camera hits it. Hard to believe, isn't it? Hard to believe. But these are the problems in life. Speaker 0: Seven years of bad luck. A king would have tossed him in the gulag. Aye, aye, aye. And look what happens when they keep calling us Nazis. Speaker 3: Who are you gonna kill? Nazis. Who who do you Nazis. Define as a Speaker 6: What do you mean? It's pretty Speaker 3: In this in this context, who's a Nazi? Stephen Miller's a Nazi. So you're gonna kill Stephen Miller? If I had Speaker 6: a chance, yeah, I was. Speaker 0: Once you crack the surface at No Kings, there's a dark and violent underbelly seething with hatred. Speaker 1: You gotta grab a gun. We gotta turn around the guns on this fascist system. These ICE agents gotta get shot and wiped out. This state, the state machinery, there's a folder display right there has to get wiped out. Speaker 0: One woman with a Mexican flag was mocking Charlie Kirk getting shot in the neck when a MAGA truck rolled by. Who is this woman? Well, she's a teacher at an elementary school. These are the people in charge of our kids. Isn't it crazy how every time we ID these maniacs they happen to be teachers or professors? What is it about the left and death? Speaker 6: Okay. So for for a birthday present, what do you hope happens? You you wake up tomorrow morning. Speaker 3: I hope that I see the obituary that we're all waiting for tomorrow. That's what I hope for. Yeah. Speaker 6: You you wishing that president Trump is dead? Speaker 3: Yes. Absolutely. Okay. Absolutely. Speaker 0: Well, Trump was already shot in the head and almost killed during a round of golf. The Secret Service just found a sniper's nest in Palm Beach with a direct line of sight to Air Force One. Speaker 10: This hunting stand was appropriately dismantled, is being flown to our our lab. I believe it's there right now. And all of the forensic tools we have, from digital tools to biometric tools, They are all gonna be applied to try to find out who put this up there, and why. Speaker 0: In North Carolina, shots were fired over a Trump flag. A guy didn't like that a guy had a MAGA and flag over his house and then went and ripped it down. And then he came back in his vehicle, aimed the pistol from the sunroof and fired shots at his property. The vigilante's been arrested. Is this what we're doing now in America? We're shooting people over politics? Liberals have lost the argument, they've lost the election, and now they've lost their minds. Trump won the popular vote. That doesn't make him king, it makes him president. And he's taken a lot of action because Biden left such a mess. The president has a mandate to stop migrants, drugs, wars, and crime, and so far he's doing a really good job. And the Supreme Court says everything he's doing is legal. It was actually Biden that the Supreme Court ruled against over and over and over again. Just because there's a lot of gold in the White House doesn't mean he's sitting on a throne.

I think Elon Musk should be held accountable for his actions, he essentially organized a fascist coup. He spent millions to get Trump into office, who is now acting as his puppet. How is that different from what George Soros does? Soros isn't trying to slash federal benefits. Electing an incompetent, insurrectionist, fascist, idiot like Trump isn't going to help our problems in Oregon. Are you saying protesting Trump and Musk is more important than what's going on here in Oregon? Everything we have here in Oregon is going to be jeopardized by the loss of our democracy at the federal level. What did Elon Musk do to break the law? Look at what he has done in the last month. Each and every one of those things is something that we would have been arrested for. I'm hoping you could tell me something specific.

Speaker 0 explains that Epstein’s legal problems began with police investigations into allegations that underage women were coming to Epstein’s house. Epstein allegedly believed that Trump was the first to inform the police about what was happening at Epstein’s house, and from that point they became bitter enemies. Speaker 1 asks if this is what Epstein is telling him. Speaker 0 confirms that this is the version he is relaying, as presented by “Oh, the hoax yesterday.” Speaker 2 clarifies that “the hoax” refers to Democrats using a narrative to attack him. He says Epstein has never said or suggested or implied that the hoax is real; he has talked to Epstein many times. He states that the whole thing comes across as a hoax, not that Epstein’s actions are a hoax. He explains that Epstein believes himself innocent, and that when he first heard the rumor, he kicked him out of Maribago. He adds that Epstein was an FBI informant trying to take this matter down. The president knows and has great sympathy for the women who have suffered harms; it’s detestable to him. He and the speaker have spoken as recently as twenty-four hours ago. What he is talking about, according to Speaker 2, are the Democrats who are pursuing this with impure motives. If they truly cared, he asks, why didn’t they act during the four years of the Biden administration when the Biden DOJ had all the records? They didn’t say a word about it, and now they pursue it for political purposes. Speaker 3 notes that our current president has had relationships with Epstein in the past, and mentions Katie Johnson and possibly other victims who have accused Trump of involvement in similar matters. In the speaker’s experience, Trump supporters will not listen to such claims. He admits the court of law isn’t present here. He asks if there is anything that can be said about the validity of those claims or whether more is known. Speaker 1 responds that he can say nothing at all. He states that the only thing he can say about President Trump is that in 2009, when he served subpoenas and gave notice to connected people that he wanted to talk to them, Trump was the only person who picked up the phone and said, “let’s just talk.” Trump offered as much time as needed, provided information that checked out, and helped him so they didn’t have to depose him. He adds that this occurred in 2009. Speaker 3 asks if there is any truth to James Patterson’s claims that Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago. Speaker 1 confirms that he definitely heard that.

The transcript captures a short, informal discussion about Donald Trump’s handling of the Epstein files and the broader question of whether presidents protect rich and powerful people at the expense of victims in sex-crime cases. The dialogue unfolds between Speaker 0 and Speaker 1, with a recent history/politics flavor and an on-the-record moment later in the exchange. Speaker 0 begins by asking Speaker 1 how Trump fought to avoid releasing the Epstein files, noting that Trump initially indicated a release but then reversed course. Speaker 1 responds noncommittally, suggesting that Trump “probably” had friends who were involved and that Trump “saved them” from trouble. The question is framed as whether this constitutes presidential conduct—protecting powerful people rather than victims. Speaker 0 presses further, asking if protecting rich and powerful people over sex-crime victims is appropriate for a president, and whether such behavior is common in presidential history. Speaker 1 counters by pointing to historical examples, stating that many presidents have favored their friends and families, adding that while JFK’s affairs were noted, he claims Kennedy “got caught,” implying possible crimes. Speaker 0 acknowledges Kennedy’s infidelity but questions whether there were crimes, while Speaker 1 reiterates the point that Kennedy “got caught,” and asserts that such behavior is not becoming of a United States president. The conversation shifts toward evaluating current leadership: Speaker 0 asks whether Speaker 1 agrees with Trump’s protection of powerful individuals at the expense of crime victims. Speaker 1 answers, “All depends on who the powerful people are,” suggesting a conditional view rather than a blanket condemnation or approval. The discussion then veers to the expectation that a president should serve all Americans, not just the wealthy, and Speaker 0 reiterates the moral question. Speaker 1, initially evasive about personal details, asserts that they are a state representative and holds a badge, claiming to work for their country. The exchange ends with a sense of irony in the narrator’s commentary: the “moral of the story” being that it’s acceptable for Donald Trump to protect rich and powerful men because he himself is rich and powerful, effectively equating protection of the powerful with personal parity. Overall, the transcript presents a back-and-forth debate about why presidents might shield powerful individuals, how historical precedents factor into current judgments, and whether leadership should be equally accountable to all segments of society, ending with a skeptical, wrap-up sentiment about the perceived fairness of such protections.

Speaker 1 asks about a 2024 reelection video in which the speaker promised to show no mercy on the cartels and to employ every military asset to combat them, and to expose all bribes and corruptions involving politicians and the cartels. Speaker 0 confirms, saying they are pursuing that course. They mention investigating where money comes from, noting a recent weekend “garbage deal” as embarrassing to the opposition and that the crowds were not large. They observe that the signs for the protests—yellow and blue—appear professionally made, as if produced in a printing shop, suggesting someone is paying for them. They acknowledge they do not mind protest and sometimes protest themselves, but claim some protesters are “professional agitators” being paid, implying there is a source behind them. Speaker 0 states they have a lot of information about who these agitators are and that the public will be very surprised when they find out who is paying them.

Speaker 1 mentions ridiculous theories about Melania's statement, joking about a time traveler. They suggest a conspiracy involving the Democratic party using TEMO for a hit. Speaker 0 interrupts, ending the conversation.