TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker asserts that hospitals are not allowed to vaccinate patients without their knowledge, yet an alarming shift is occurring inside the medical system. They claim the word vaccine is quietly disappearing from hospital consent forms and is being replaced with a broad, vague category: biologics or biogenics. Under this new classification, a hospital can technically administer vaccines or other biological products without explicit patient consent. Insiders are reportedly observing that new surgical and hospital consent forms no longer list specific treatments. They allegedly do not say vaccine or injection; they simply say biologics or biogenics, a category so wide it can include almost anything made from living organisms and their byproducts. The scariest part, according to the speaker, is that most people sign these forms without reading them because they trust the system, because they are in pain, overwhelmed, or seconds away from being put under anesthesia. This creates a setup where a patient can enter for a routine procedure, sign a consent form filled with vague terminology, go unconscious, and wake up having received something they did not directly approve. The speaker emphasizes that no medical system should be allowed to hide procedures behind intentionally unclear language. They urge spreading the message because, in their view, most people are unaware that this is happening.

All childhood vaccines will soon contain mRNA, making them gene therapies that alter genetics. The vaccines won't require reapproval or go through any additional processes. The focus is on integrating mRNA into every vaccine, which is concerning because it involves tinkering with genes. The speaker urges people to be cautious and not get any vaccines, emphasizing their strong opposition to it. The speaker believes that there is a significant amount of money involved in this shift towards gene therapies.

There is a concerning loophole in the law regarding the food supply. If a cow or pig receives an mRNA gene therapy, they can still be labeled as organic. This means that organic food can potentially contain these therapies. The issue arises if the therapy alters their DNA, can be transmitted to humans, or remains in their system. These factors make it possible for consumers to unknowingly consume these substances in their organic food.

Speaker 0 discusses Bill Gates’ alleged involvement with Tyrana Biosciences, stating that Gates has donated $50,000,000 to a new company called Tyrana Biosciences, and that they are going to create a new category of biologically modified crops. One of Tyrana’s first targets is soybeans, according to the speaker. The speaker claims that the product will not be detectable as modified, nor labeled as GMO, because the EPA has said that it is, quote, “naturally occurring compounds and is not GMO.” The speaker explains the mechanism: it is taking RNA from a virus and using it to insert whatever gene they want into whatever crop they want. Once the RNA is inside the plant, it replicates, and it gives it different features. The company allegedly brags that they can create whatever feature they want. One of their targets is to make it more insect resistant, so the speaker says you’re going to put insecticides within the food. The speaker states that Tyrana is targeting tomatoes, corn, and soybeans first. The claim is that it will not be labeled as modified or GMO. The speaker asserts that Bill Gates is betting on making profit by genetically modifying our food without telling us. The speaker claims that the EPA has already given it the green light.

I support my amendment to prevent funding for transgenic edible vaccines. This concept is not far-fetched; research is underway to turn plants like lettuce and spinach into mRNA vaccine producers. The goal is for individuals to grow these plants in their gardens, which raises safety concerns. Past incidents, such as vaccine contamination in corn meant for livestock, highlight the risks of cross-contamination. We need to prioritize food safety and ensure the public knows what’s in their food. Contaminating our food supply with foreign DNA poses unknown dangers. Given recent experiences, we should be cautious about funding this research. I urge support for my amendment.

UC Riverside and UC Berkeley have developed vaccines in lettuce and tomatoes, while tobacco companies have done so in tobacco products. The concern is about proper dosing and labeling of these products to ensure consumer safety. The bill aims for transparency in grocery stores selling vaccine-containing produce. The technology is still in development, but the goal is to prevent issues like improper dosing seen in the cattle industry. The discussion highlights the need for consumer awareness and regulation in this emerging field.

A person knows a kid who works at a feedlot in Nebraska. The feedlot was bought out by a company, leading to an increase in vaccine use. The company plans to implement mRNA vaccines for cattle, which was trialed on pigs. The pigs experienced negative effects, with some dying and traces of the vaccine found in their meat. This raises concerns about the potential impact on humans.

Human vaccines can be integrated into foods like lettuce and tomatoes, as demonstrated by research from the University of California Riverside and UC Berkeley. There are concerns about the legality and consumer awareness regarding these products. If a food contains a vaccine, it should be labeled as a pharmaceutical to ensure proper dosage information for consumers. The discussion highlights the importance of transparency in food labeling, especially regarding potential vaccine content. The aim is to prevent issues similar to those seen in the cattle industry, where improper dosing led to resistance. Ultimately, consumers should be informed about what they are purchasing in grocery stores.

The current vaccines contain harmful monkey virus sequences and toxic lipid nanoparticles, which are not meant for human use. Many people have already experienced injuries and deaths from these products, but the full effects may take years to manifest. Research shows that these gene therapies can create abnormal proteins, potentially leading to autoimmune diseases. The idea of using this technology for cancer treatment raises concerns, as it disrupts natural immune functions. Health and wellness cannot be achieved through injections or pills; they come from a healthy lifestyle. Questions arise about why some countries, like China, do not administer these genetic injections to their military. Informed consent is crucial, but many patients are unaware of the risks and that these products are not fully approved. The technology remains as unsafe as it was in the past.

Genetically modified food is not labeled in the US due to FDA regulations, as it's considered equivalent to unmodified food. Consumers are kept in the dark about GMO ingredients to prevent confusion. The FDA relies on safety assessments from the patent-holding companies like Monsanto, Pfizer, or Syngenta, without conducting independent studies. FDA scientists have expressed concerns about this practice, urging against allowing GMO foods on the market due to unknown consequences.

A bill in Tennessee proposes labeling food with vaccines, while Idaho has a similar bill. Edible vaccines are being studied at UC Riverside, where scientists are exploring the use of plants like lettuce to produce mRNA vaccines. Traditionally, vaccines are grown in eggs or animal cells, but plant-based vaccines are being developed. Genetic editing is being used to create edible vaccines in plants like bananas, potatoes, tomatoes, lettuce, rice, wheat, soybeans, and corn. Medicago is using gene editing to turn plants into mini bioreactors for vaccine production. There are concerns about mRNA vaccines being used on livestock, with the potential for transference to humans through meat consumption. Transparency laws are being debated to inform consumers about genetically modified products in livestock.

The speaker attempted to defund research on transgenic edible plant vaccines in the ag approves bill, arguing that taxpayer dollars are funding research into vaccines grown in lettuce and spinach. The concern is that people will be vaccinated when they eat these plants. The speaker believes there should be tighter regulations due to the risk of pollen escaping and contaminating neighboring farms that do not intend to grow vaccines in their food. Although the speaker was able to initially stop taxpayer spending on this research in the ag approves bill, the bill was discarded in favor of an omnibus bill, resulting in another year of funding for transgenic edible plant vaccine research.

A Kentucky representative introduces an amendment to prevent funding for grants related to transgenic edible vaccines. He argues that taxpayer dollars are being used to fund research at the University of California, Riverside, where scientists are studying the possibility of using plants like lettuce and spinach to produce mRNA vaccines. The representative expresses concerns about the potential risks and contamination of food sources, citing past incidents where crops were contaminated with vaccines meant for animals. He emphasizes the need for a safe food supply and urges adoption of his amendment. The amendment is ultimately agreed to.

Speaker 0 notes that vaccines are entering the food chain in several species. He mentions that currently, all farmed shrimp are being vaccinated with mRNA, and that pork is an unknown amount being vaccinated with mRNA. He references Merck, described as one of the originators of ivermectin, and asks why they didn’t make a big fuss about the money they lost during COVID because of the inability to sell ivermectin into the whole thing, suggesting they could have been a kingpin in this, and they were silent. He says this is because they own a lot of mRNA companies. He notes that some of the companies state on their advertising, “we put the right gene in your livestock vaccine.” He states there are vaccines going into the swine industry, but there is no data on how much is being sold, where, and who the buyers are, so the volume remains speculative. The technology is described as customized vaccines where, on a farm, they take samples of the diseases on the farm, then go into the lab, and a few days later, they produce an mRNA vaccine customized to the farm’s diseases. He emphasizes that there’s no testing, no research, nothing. They have a general understanding of the mRNA aspect of it on a general standpoint, but for each of these antigens, there is known no understanding.

A congressman from Kentucky introduces an amendment to prevent funds from being used for grants related to transgenic, edible vaccines. He argues that taxpayer money is being used to fund research at the University of California, Riverside, where scientists are studying the possibility of turning plants like lettuce and spinach into RNA vaccine factories. He expresses concerns about the potential risks and contamination of food supply, citing past incidents where corn vaccines for pigs contaminated soybeans and caused recalls. He emphasizes the need for a safe food supply and urges adoption of his amendment. The amendment is ultimately agreed to.

There's a Pfizer subsidiary called ZOTIS that has mRNA injected over 100 million wildlife in the U.S., including pets. This initiative, funded by Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, has been ongoing for the past year and a half. Hunters were the primary source of information about this, as it was published in their magazines. A study on Staten Island involved injecting 100 white-tailed deer with Pfizer's mRNA vaccines, leading to widespread administration across the country without public knowledge. Concerns arise about hunters consuming venison, believing it to be organic. Additionally, mRNA technology is being used on vegetables and cattle, raising further worries about food safety.

This bill aims to ensure transparency and informed consent regarding gene therapy products and other medical interventions. It requires products potentially acting as gene therapy to be labeled accordingly, and information about potential exposure and shedding to be disclosed. The bill also emphasizes the importance of fully informed consent, including awareness of benefits, risks, and side effects. However, lobbyists, including those representing big pharma and agribusiness, are opposing the bill. The speaker urges support for the bill and criticizes those who oppose transparency and consumer knowledge. The bill's passage would reveal important information about adverse events and the use of gene therapy and mRNA vaccines in food.

We are unaware of what we are consuming in our food supply. Merck has been injecting mRNA into pigs since 2018, creating transmissible mRNA that can be passed on to those who consume it. Without informed consent laws, those who have refused mRNA vaccines may unknowingly receive them through their food. This technology could be used in plants and animals, leading to unintended vaccination through food consumption.

Lobbyists for cattlemen and pork associations will use mRNA COVID vaccines on livestock. Attorney Tom Rens warns there are no laws requiring informed consent for vaccinated food, nor are there laws requiring disclosure of food being vaccinated with the spike protein clot shot. The UK passed the Genetic Technology Precision Breeding Bill of 1990 to exclude references to precision bred organisms, another term for gene edited. Gene edited food can be legally marketed in the UK and can be labeled non-GMO in America. If butchered in America, it can be labeled Product of USA.

The speaker claims mRNA is in the food supply. Merck has been injecting mRNA into pigs since 2018 with a product called Sequebiti. They claim to be able to make transmissible mRNA, meaning they can put it in an animal so that it transmits to whoever is ingesting it, effectively vaccinating them. The speaker suggests this could be engineered into plants and animals. Without informed consent laws, people who refused mRNA vaccines may get them through their food.

mRNA vaccines are being introduced into the food chain, particularly in farmed shrimp and swine. Merck, known for ivermectin, has remained quiet about its financial losses during COVID, possibly due to its ownership of several mRNA companies. These companies advertise customized vaccines for livestock, created by sampling diseases on farms and producing tailored mRNA vaccines in a matter of days. However, there is a lack of data on the extent of these vaccines' use and no thorough testing or research on the specific antigens involved. The understanding of mRNA technology is general, but detailed knowledge about each antigen is absent.

The discussion centers on pets being used as self-amplifying mRNA vectors. The USDA quietly approved Merck's self-amplifying RNA shots called Novavac NXT for cats and dogs with no real safety testing. It says it gives a small dose of RNA particles delivered in the Novavac NXT vaccine. RNA copies exponentially in the cells, and the copies are transcripted into large amounts of the desired antigen. The antigen stimulates a more robust humular and cellular immune response. All sounds good in theory. However, these injections may shed messenger RNA and synthetic antigens to human owners through breath, saliva, or fluids may cause long term genetic damage similar to that seen in humans may recombine with wild viruses creating dangerous new pathogens. This rollout puts both pets and their owners into an uncontrolled genetic experiment without consent. “So says Nicholas Holcher, Miles per hour. So masters in public health. We don't know. Nobody tested it. Nobody did any studies. We don't have long term studies. We don't have short term studies. We just don't know. I'm a little scared. I really don't want to be a part of this.” And by the way, they're actually talking about spraying messenger RNA on our crops. How are we affecting our I feel like this is the everybody remember the book Brave New World by Aldous Huxley. I think I had to read it in high school. Was one of those required readings. Or what was the other book? 1984? Like, I feel like we're living in this dystopian universe where we just experiment with all these genetic things and we just throw it into the environment and throw it into our pets and throw it into people, and we don't know what the outcome is until we see. Are we all gonna go the way the dinosaurs? I don't know. Now I really sound like a conspiracy theorist. Are we all gonna like, is somebody gonna come along in a few thousand years and find fossil remains and try to figure out why we all died? I don't know. It's fine. It's fine. It's just a little nervous.” One speaker says they homestead: they raise their own chickens. They’re not treated with chemicals. Their dogs and cats don't get vaccinated with things that might shed into the environment, and they’re growing all their own organic fruits and vegetables. “Yep, I'm I'm I'm going that way. Y'all y'all do what you need to do. It's a little scary. I don't recommend that particular vaccine for your dogs. I I guess that's the bottom line. I don't know. Be careful what you eat.”

A congressman from Kentucky opposes funding for transgenic, edible vaccines. He argues that taxpayer money is being used to study the possibility of turning plants like lettuce and spinach into mRNA vaccine factories. He believes this is a bad idea and that the American people should not be funding it. He mentions a previous incident where corn contaminated soybeans, leading to a recall and destruction of crops. He expresses concerns about the safety of genetically modified food and the potential for unintended consequences. The congressman urges adoption of his amendment to stop funding this research. The amendment is ultimately agreed to.

SB 63 is a consumer right to know measure that requires labeling of cloned foods. One speaker criticizes the FDA for allowing the sale of meat from cloned animals without further research and without labeling. Another speaker from the California Farm Bureau opposes labeling, arguing that it creates unnecessary fear and that educating consumers about the value of cloning technology is more important. The first speaker highlights how various industries have fought against labeling in the past, emphasizing the importance of consumers knowing what's in their food. A third speaker expresses concern about potential legal consequences for criticizing the meat and poultry industry. The conversation ends with a mention of veggie libel laws being different.

Transgenic lettuce is being developed to produce mRNA vaccines. The idea is to genetically engineer lettuce and spinach so that consuming them can provide vaccination against biological threats. However, there are scientific problems and potential health risks associated with this proposal. Moreover, it is part of a broader plan to bypass informed consent by incorporating mRNA gene technology into food. Another concerning concept is self-spreading vaccines, where respiratory viruses carry the vaccine and infect others. These proposals are seen as dangerous, reckless, and ethically and scientifically unsound.