reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In the clip, the participants discuss a chaotic, dangerous incident. Speaker 1 confronts Speaker 0 about a supposed leakage: “Release the cookie file. That's all you wanna know. Release it. Tell him about the n word. You said it today.” Speaker 1 and Speaker 2 push back on a racial slur, saying, “Common black people to nigger is bad. You can't say that,” and urge Speaker 0 not to use the term, insisting, “You can't call us niggers. We work hard for our,” as Speaker 0 is told to “just go.” The tension escalates as Speaker 0 expresses violent intent: “Yeah. I know the best course of action, but I wanna kill each and every one of these guys.” The group describes terrifying moments around their vehicle: “they were surrounding our car,” and “you hit that gas, you hit that other car. You couldn't see nothing because he's on top.” There is uncertainty about injuries: Speaker 0 asks, “Is he dead?” and Speaker 1 replies, “No. I don't know. Hopefully.” They note armed individuals nearby: “There’s armed people surrounding my car. And they’re armed. They all have pistols.” The dialogue reveals a confrontation in which weapons are present and self-defense is discussed. Speaker 2 says, “That was like … flashed on?,” and Speaker 0 notes the presence of armed people and a tense environment: “the ones with pistols, the open carrier.” The scene seems to involve threats, a possible arrest or detainment, and concern about safety. There is a mention of external pressure and harassment: someone comments on “Kodak Black sent me to press you for throwing ramen on Marquee,” followed by references to people at a house and the possibility of being towed. The participants discuss who did what and why, with Speaker 0 insisting on a separation from a situation, noting, “I wasn't nowhere near here. I had left,” and indicating prior interactions with others in the group. The group supports staying with a friend described as “the good guy,” while another person is described as “the motherfucker on the ground, the bad guy.” They attempt to verify safety and proximity to others, with statements like, “Tell me. Brother safe. He did everything.” They recount attempts to handle the situation and who was there during the incident, including a clarification that there were people around and an account of someone entering a car. Media handling and legal strategy are addressed toward the end: Speaker 0 reveals his livestream status and that his channel was banned, though Speaker 2 clarifies, “They didn't ban you.” Speaker 2 advises Speaker 0 to stay quiet and stay recorded: “Just do not say anyone, yes. Of course, I do. Look. Just hang tight. Record. Don't say anything. Don't answer questions.” They emphasize the importance of documentation and having a lawyer, with a concluding remark that, “It the good thing is listen. It's Christmas, and a lot of my lawyers don't celebrate Christmas. So you're gonna be good.”

Speaker 0: You trust Costco with your family's dinner, but their meat undergoes a controversial process that's banned in several countries. Speaker 1: Everyone loves Costco chicken or even that rotisserie chicken from Walmart or your favorite grocery store. But what if that label on that rotisserie bird isn't telling you the whole story? What you're about to learn could change the way that you buy protein forever. Costco chicken is beloved and seen as a great deal. I know this. But recent discussions about preservatives, labeling accuracy, and contamination has put that belief at risk. Guys, look. Speaker 2: Costco is facing a lawsuit over its popular rotisserie chickens. A group of shareholders filed the lawsuit against the company over its treatment in raising chickens. Speaker 0: You trust Costco with your family's dinner, but their meat undergoes a controversial process that's banned in several countries. Most shoppers have no idea this is happening right under their noses. The real question isn't what they're doing. It's why they're allowed to do it. You know that famous $5 rotisserie chicken at Costco? The one that's been the same price since Obama was president? Well, there's a juicy secret they don't want you knowing about. Speaker 1: They label it as no preservatives, guys. And this goes hand in hand with Walmart and your probably your favorite grocery store. This is what I would call a huge scandal. There's a reason why those chickens have been four ninety nine since 2009. It's to get you in the store. It's to get you to spend a ton of money, and they've cut a lot of corners to make sure that it's cheap and easy to produce for you. Welcome, guys. My name's Cohen from Riverside Homestead. What I do is I give you guys value. I do the digging so you don't have to do it. So if you appreciate that, hit the thumbs up right now. Let the community know where you're chiming in from, what state, and let me crush your dreams on rotisserie chicken like ugh. Trust me. I know. So watch. This chicken is labeled as no preservatives, guys. And this goes hand in hand with Walmart and your probably your favorite grocery store. This is what I would call a huge scandal. There's a reason why those chickens have been four ninety nine since 2009. It's to get you in the store. It's to get you to spend a ton of money, and they've cut a lot of corners to make sure that it's cheap and easy to produce for you. Welcome, guys. My name's Cohen from Riverside Homestead. What I do is I give you guys value. I do the digging so you don't have to do it. So if you appreciate that, hit the thumbs up right now. Let the community know where you're chiming in from, what state, and let me crush your dreams on rotisserie chicken like ugh. Trust me. I know. So watch. This chicken is labeled as no preservatives, organic, healthy as it gets. We've talked about this before on this channel. Loopholes. Speaker 0: Costco injects every single rotisserie chicken with a phosphate solution before it hits those warming lights. Think you're buying pure chicken? Think again. You're paying for water with a side of poultry. This liquid injection makes each bird weigh significantly more, So you're essentially buying a sponge that's been soaked in chemical juice. Speaker 1: Did you guys know that these chickens are only about six weeks old because of everything that they pump into them? It's a marketing ploy to get you through the door for the cheap chicken and buy everything else. And there's active lawsuits right now. This is especially bred chicken in horrible conditions. Speaker 3: Grown and fattened on likely corn and soy that's GMO to create this chicken in six weeks that you're eating. They take it to a mass slaughter house where they dip it in chlorine and other toxins to make it safe, and it's leaving those residues on the chicken. And this bird isn't just seasoned with normal herbs and spices. They have preservatives in here like sodium phosphate that's linked to liver and kidney damage and carrageenan, which can degrade into polygenin, which is a known inflammatory agent and possible carcinogen. Speaker 1: Yeah. I found information on that from another doctor. Speaker 4: Doctor Tanya, what's one thing you never buy from the grocery store? Rotisserie chicken. Why? The bag the chicken is stored in is plastic, and it leaches chemicals that get into the food when it's sitting under the heat. Most stores inject the chickens with additives so that they can last on the shelf longer. Chickens are often marinated in a preservative solution. We opt for preservative free cosmetics, and then we're eating preservative infested chicken. And carrageenan. This is a chemical that precooked poultry is injected with to make it tender and juicy, but guess what? It can also inflame the gut. Carrageenan is banned in Europe, but not in The United States. Speaker 1: Yet again, another ingredient item banned in other countries, but allowed in The US. I know we love it because it's such a good deal. It's cheap. It's easy. It's taste great. I'm on the struggle bus with you guys on this one, but I'm reading countless articles, discussion about preservatives, labeling accuracy and contamination that has put all this belief at risk. Now I recently was at a Costco filming this right here. I was there. I saw it. It says no added hormones or steroids in a chicken that is fully developed in six weeks. Right there at the bottom, you can see it says no added preservatives. And have you ever wondered why it's in a plastic bag that you can put in your microwave? Microwave safe, plastic bag, put the two and two together. Speaker 3: Right out of the oven stored in a plastic bag. Nobody really knows what type of plastic bag this is, but it's likely a mix of polyethylene terephthalate. Remember that word phthalate? It's a known hormone disruptor, and this is microwave safe. So you're putting hot food into a plastic bag that can leach these hormone disrupting chemicals, and a 117,000,000 of these are eaten each year in The US. So share this video with your friends. Speaker 1: This is what I'm talking about. Hundreds of thousand millions of these chickens are sold in The US a year. This is why you need to share this out. Sorry folks, but they're just cutting too many corners these days. And it comes down to us. And who's gonna suffer? Us. They're gonna make a ton of money. So if you dive into the legal term no preservatives, they found loopholes to where they can actually put this legally. This is where the class action lawsuit or the lawsuit from a couple people in California are like, hold up. Wait a minute, you guys are using this stuff and this is preservatives, but you guys are saying it's no preservatives. In short, the processing agents that they're using can be deemed not to be called preservatives. Oh yeah, you're getting something with no preservatives, organic as it gets. Yet at the end of the day, you and I would look at that cross eyed and be like, Yeah, what they're using works the same way. It's not what you think it is. That's just what it is. I'm not sure if you guys have seen what these large scale poultry processing facilities look like, but it's not happy chickens walking around a field eating green grass and bugs. Think about the cross contamination that occurs and what safeguards exist and where they fail. For certain that these huge plants they fail. Great thing for Costco is they can scale. They can pump out millions of birds in six weeks and give it to us for a low price even with them losing money. That's right. Like I said, scammedemic kind of they will take a loss on this because they're producing at such a large scale and cutting corners just to get you through the door for that $4 and 99 rotisserie chicken so that you put hundreds of dollars of their stuff in your cart and check out. Other stores, Walmart, other grocery stores, they have caught on to this. They know what Costco found out. They're all doing the same thing. This is information that you need to consider. Speaker 5: Alright, guys. Here are three scary facts about Costco chicken that'll hopefully make you never buy this shit ever again. Alright. So I had to move on over to Lowe's to show you part two of this video. So they start by bathing the chicken in chlorine. They actually put it in a chlorine bath, and it soaks in this chlorine for about thirty minutes. Why does that and should that matter to you? I'm gonna tell you. Next thing they do is they inject the chicken with a chemical compound called TSP. It's trisodium phosphate. Guys, I'm just at Lowe's pulling this stuff off the shelves. This is crazy. I mean, this is the shit that you're allowing into your body. Read the warning label on this and tell me that this is a good idea to ingest in the human body. And then the last thing, which is I don't know if it's scarier than the other two things. They're all really bad. But they they let the chicken sit in these plastic bags, and they sit there for days on end, hours, days, whatever. It's sitting in your fridge for probably a long time. There are microplastics being released into the chicken from the plastic bags that are getting into your body, and it is unbelievably bad for you. Mean, there's microplastics showing up in human hearts, in in in men's testicles. Like, it's really, really bad, guys. So here's the deal. Everyone's gonna ask me, what do I do? Buy your chickens local. Go to your local farmer's market. Go to your local farms. They are a little bit more expensive, so just eat less or go or or just be resourceful and find deals. But stop buying this shit because it's literally killing you. Speaker 1: When I go to Home Depot and I pull TSP off the shelves, what kind of chemical is that? Speaker 6: So when you grab TSP at Home Depot, you're holding trisodium phosphate. It's a heavy duty cleaner, often used to degrease and prep surfaces before painting. Powerful stuff. Just use it with care. Speaker 1: What's the caution label say? Speaker 6: The caution label on TSP usually warns about skin and eye irritation. So gloves and goggles are a must. It'll also say not to inhale the dust and to keep it away from kids. Basically, respect the power and you'll be good. Speaker 1: What if you eat it? Speaker 6: If you ingest TSP, it's no joke. It can cause serious irritation. Think burns in your mouth, throat and stomach. The label will tell you to seek medical help immediately. No waiting. Speaker 1: So yeah, definitely not a seasoning. Speaker 1: But if you go down the rabbit hole on that one, it's gonna say that it's a different type and it's the safe version and the FDA would never allow that specific one in your food. Just a different one. So when they put it in like rotisserie chicken, they're probably just putting safe amounts of it. Speaker 6: Oh no, don't worry. They're not putting TSP in your rotisserie chicken. That'd be a disaster. Some food safe phosphates might be used in processing, totally different and regulated, but the cleaning product TSP strictly for walls, not wings. Speaker 1: Are you sure it's not the same thing? Because a lot of reels say it's the same thing. Speaker 6: Yeah. I get why those reels pop up, but trust me, food grade phosphates and TSP cleaner are not the same. The food versions are heavily regulated for safety. If they try tossing the Home Depot stuff in your chicken, the FDA would have a feel day. So no worries. Speaker 1: I'm telling you guys, it's a deep dive in half. Make informed decisions. Realize that these big companies are all about making the money, not about bringing you the safest product. And trust me, it's a little bit of a stab to me too because I like easy, I like tasty and we need that sometimes. But in this case, they may have jumped through too many hoops too many times, and it's putting Us consumers possibly in a bad position. Speaker 1: I've got two other great videos. If you guys didn't see these videos, you gotta watch these. These will blow your mind equally as much. Please let me know what you think down in the comments. Thumbs up. Share this out and subscribe because I've got a lot more coming down the pipe. Keep prepping, keep learning, keep doing. We'll see you guys on the next one.

The speaker explains how to dispute a charge on a Citibank credit card. Steps: log in to your Citibank credit card account, click on view transactions, scroll to the transaction you want to dispute and click on it, click on dispute charge, fill out the dispute form, submit it, and you are done. Remember to click on the submit dispute form.

The CDC is accused of hiding crucial information, with a 148-page report on myocarditis after COVID-19 vaccination being completely redacted. Debt is a growing issue in the US, with credit scores dropping and interest rates rising. Done With Debt offers innovative debt relief strategies to help individuals struggling with debt. Michael Pearson from Done With Debt emphasizes the importance of seeking help and provides solutions to manage and settle debts effectively. For more information, visit done with debt.com.

A senator questions a 23andMe representative about their data privacy policies, specifically regarding the sale of consumer data. The senator claims the company's privacy statement says they cannot share information without consent, yet they are selling it. The representative states customers can delete their data anytime, even after the sale. The senator points out that the deletion page went down after the sale announcement. The representative claims the issue was fixed and customers can now delete their data. However, the senator reads from 23andMe's privacy policy, which states the company retains genetic information, date of birth, and sex even after account deletion. The representative initially denies retaining genetic information, but then admits to retaining name, email address, and other data. The senator accuses the company of not allowing consumers to permanently delete their data and lying to them. The senator concludes that 23andMe controls consumer data and is violating its promises.

Speaker: The thing that makes the current system what they would call slavery is debt-based and secrecy. And the failure of their elected representatives to require, you know, to get obey the law. So you have lawlessness, you have debt-based, and you have secrecy. The problem is not that the currency is fiat. Because if you go back through history, if you read Alexander Del Mar, the most effective currencies in the world are fiat currencies that are well governed. We have a debt-based fiat currency that is not well governed in my opinion, but it could be. Now remember, there has been almost no support in the general population for managing it responsibly. Everybody was like, no. Don’t manage it responsibly. Get me my check. And if that means you’re irresponsible, that’s okay. I want my check. But you are not gonna fix this situation by going to gold and silver. You’re gonna make it much worse. Because while we’ve done this sort of hear no evil, see no evil, you know, speak no evil for thirty years, the central bankers have accumulated all the gold. So now that they have all the gold, you’re gonna tell me we’re gonna go to a gold system? Are you out of your mind? Because now they’ve got the gold. And if you start a gold transaction system, now you need gold from them, and they’ve got you over a barrel. Right? And what are you gonna do to get gold? You’re gonna have to sell your land. You’re gonna have to sell your kids. You’re gonna have to sell real assets to get their gold. Right? Why would you do that? Why would you create, you know, you’re dependent on your enemy now. You’re gonna increase your dependency on your enemy now? You’re out of your mind. Okay. That’s not a sound money system, especially because they wanna make it digital. And so they’re gonna have fiat gold, which is even— I mean, if you think fiat is bad, where do you see fiat gold when they own all the gold? So, what we want is we want a fiat system, and we want it with, you know, lawful and no secrecy or minimal secrecy. You’re gonna have to have some secrecy and a good governance system. Can we get there? Of course, we can get there. But we can’t get there if you have an entire population that is absolutely committed to corrupt short-term behavior.

To check if you're being tracked, dial *#62# on your phone. If you see any call forwarding options, you're being tracked. To disable this, dial ##002# on your phone. This erases all call forwardings. Like, share, and follow for more content like this. Translation: To check if you are being tracked, dial *#62# on your phone. If you see any call forwarding options, you are being tracked. To disable this, dial ##002# on your phone. This will erase all call forwardings. Like, share, and follow for more content like this.

Speaker 0 asks whether you need to show ID, questions if that has a warrant, and asks if you don’t have an ID.

In this video, the speaker discusses how to handle objections when asking for a sale. They explain that if someone says no, it means they haven't been given enough information about the value of the product or service. The speaker advises finding out specifically why the person said no, whether it's because of the price or a lack of fit. They emphasize the importance of showing value and giving a good reason to buy. If the person still says no, it's okay to move on if it's not a good fit. The speaker concludes by saying that if you handle objections well, you will be successful.

The speaker asserts that you cannot legally pay your taxes. They state: “tax dollars have been spent in a global crime syndicate,” and “you now know this and it’s provable,” which means “if you willingly pay your taxes you now are a willing participant and co conspirator.” The guidance given is for when you file an exemption: “This is what you’re gonna say when you file an exemption. Owe back taxes? This is what you’re gonna tell your agent.” The agent will threaten you, and you should respond with, “I said that I will not be a willing participant in a global crime syndicate.” The speaker says you should repeat it, “and you repeat it again.” They advise to “play the congress game” and claim that “you legally cannot pay your taxes now that you know this. It is against the law.”

Speaker 0 argues that you must get your wealth out of the system and downsize all of your assets and resources, especially if you are a public figure and you have any presence on social media. The guidance is that if you’re fighting this “good fight” and you have a public presence online, you need to be downsizing your wealth and assets. The speaker stresses moving as much of your wealth into Bitcoin as possible, so that nobody knows you have it and there is no way to prove you possess it. Once it’s moved into Bitcoin, it’s described as “gone,” in the sense that it cannot be easily traced or proven in the same way as traditional holdings. The warning continues that you should avoid having Bitcoin on any centralized exchanges in a way that makes it obvious whose name is tied to the holdings. The explicit instruction is to get the money into Bitcoin and keep it off centralized exchanges where it can be seen in your name. After acquiring Bitcoin, the recommended setup is a cold storage air-gap multisig wallet. The speaker emphasizes that you should not leave Bitcoin in a system that can be easily accessed or monitored; instead, use cold storage that is air-gapped and protected by a multisignature scheme. The speaker describes the consequences of losing access to private keys: if you lose your private keys, you lose all your Bitcoin. The phrasing used is that you should “go on a boat ride and you fucking lose your private keys and it sucks,” underscoring the irreversible loss associated with losing keys. Overall, the message centers on aggressively relocating wealth into Bitcoin, prioritizing anonymity and security through cold storage and multisig setups, and recognizing the high risk of permanent loss if private keys are lost or compromised. The repeated emphasis is that you must get your wealth out of the system, stay light on your feet, and move assets into Bitcoin to maintain anonymity and reduce traceability.

Hello, I'm Clay Joyner, the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Mississippi. Be aware of calls, texts, or social media messages claiming to be from a government agency and threatening you with a problem. This is a scam. Federal agencies will never ask for personal information, pressure you to lie or keep secrets, or demand immediate payment. Specifically, federal agencies will never request payment via cryptocurrency like Bitcoin, prepaid debit cards, cash, or gold bars. If you receive such a request, hang up or ignore the message. Report the scam to the Federal Trade Commission at ReportFraud.ftc.gov. Thank you.

"We got them. We finally got them. We caught the IRS red handed." "They're frauds, fabricated, phantom tax returns the IRS claims that you filed but can't produce because they never existed." "Here's the crime. An IRS agent falsified the records." "A supervisor covered it up." "The DOJ marched into court and used those fake records against Americans and then admitted under oath they have no signed returns to back it up." "That's not sloppy paperwork. That's a RICO fraud, a criminal enterprise operating under color of law." "And it doesn't stop there. Judges look the other way." "Multilayered fraud, IRS, DOJ, and the judicial system." "It's time to shut down this rogue agency once and for all." "Chew on this, America."

Think you deleted your data? That's cute. The Internet doesn't delete. It archives. Every click, every typo, every late night search you hoped no one saw. It's all logged by your apps, your ISP, your phone, even your smart fridge if it's nosy enough. You think you've wiped the slate clean, but it's all still there, tucked away in the shadows. It's stored where you see it. It's stored where they can sell it. Because forgetting has no profit. But remembering, that's where the money is. Your data has a memory and it's not yours anymore. Those innocent searches, those fleeting moments of curiosity, they're commodities now packaged and sold to the highest bidder. Every detail, every secret you thought was yours is out there waiting to be exploited. Just remember, the Internet never forgets.

Speaker 0 describes a strategy for people having problems with law enforcement: file a Freedom of Information Act request with the county manager for any communique regarding your name, including emails or any entries in the NCIC system or state bureau of investigation records mentioning you. Send the request to the county manager or assistant county manager stating, under the Freedom of Information Act, you're requesting any communique regarding your name. The response should be a file dump showing what the FBI has entered, or what’s in the NCIC system about you. If you find false information, request its correction. If they ignore you, you sue them in federal court. The NCIC national database is governed by the FBI, and it’s a federal crime to use the NCIC system to submit false information. Lawyers may downplay it as casual talk, but it’s described as a very serious offense; most false NCIC-entry cases are settled quickly and quietly to avoid public scrutiny. Speaker 0 advises to file a FOIA request for any communication regarding your name, with the county, the state bureau of investigation, and NCIC systems. When you receive it, examine for false information and request corrections; if there’s no response within days (ten suggested), you sue. This is presented as a federal crime and a violation of federal law and state statutes. The speaker mentions ongoing litigation in Cherokee County, North Carolina against the sheriff and others for false NCIC entries, and urges people nationwide to pursue accountability, citing a personal grievance with Dustin Smith, a candidate for sheriff in Cherokee County, including an alleged incident where his wife faced an arrest warrant for second-degree trespass after being told there were civil papers to pick up, leading to property removal and stolen items, with the trespass charges later dropped and expunged. The discussion pivots to the founders: the last resort is emphasized, citing The Federalist Papers number 28 by Alexander Hamilton, about when representatives betray constituents and the people have no recourse other than self-defense. The Declaration of Independence is cited about abuses and usurpations, the right to alter or abolish a destructive government, and the right to revolution and to keep and bear arms. The Second Amendment is described as not just about hunting or self-defense but about securing freedom; the government cannot tell people what guns to have to resist tyranny, and peaceful gun ownership includes machine guns in the context of a right to bear arms, with peaceful not equaling harmless. Speaker 0 concludes by urging viewers to use FOIA to obtain documentation, pursue lawsuits for false information, and notes that public servants’ communications are not private, including text messages and emails, and that defamation per se laws can apply. The goal is to hold public servants accountable; a 10% turnout of suing viewers could deter abuse, and the speaker emphasizes willingness to go to trial rather than settle, even at personal cost. Speaker 1 ends with the words “Spark. Spark. Spark. Spark.”

The speaker discusses the national debt and how it has grown over the years. They question who the debt is owed to and how it is being paid back. They explain how the Federal Reserve controls the money supply and manipulates the economy. The speaker also highlights the impact of debt on individuals and society, urging listeners to break free from the cycle of debt. They emphasize the need to be aware of the system and make conscious financial decisions.

Speaker 0 describes smart meters as more than just electricity meters, asserting they function as personal surveillance devices. They claim smart meters sense when devices are turned on or off, measure watt usage (even for small devices like an electric toothbrush), and transmit that data wirelessly through neighbors’ meters to the power company. The data allegedly records electric consumption every minute, stored forever on computers the public cannot access, revealing when someone is home, asleep, on vacation, hosting visitors, using lamps or tools, running a business from home, or bootlegging energy off the grid. The speaker asserts this creates a vivid profile of private living patterns and indicates at-home presence on the night of a murder. The speaker contends this is not electrical metering but personal surveillance—a warrantless search daily. They claim personal life information travels from the meter to the power company, to the government, police, and insurance companies, and to anyone who partners with the power company to access it. The speaker further asserts that even without a direct data-sharing agreement, information can be intercepted via the wireless signal from the meter, because smart meters are radio transmitters. They identify a one-watt radio station licensed by the FCC as the transmitter sending all electrical life details to a data center. Examples are given of authorities in Ohio, Texas, and British Columbia using smart meter data to pinpoint marijuana grow houses, enforce business licenses, and punish private home activities, implying surveillance beyond what residents accept. The claim is made that the power company can sell personal life data to anyone, and that unusual power usage patterns can be used as probable cause to raid a home for growing marijuana or running a computer server without a license. The speaker describes this level of surveillance as “about as big brother as it gets,” with utility workers going door-to-door to install meters. They express a personal opinion that smart meters should be removed from homes, arguing that power companies cannot claim the right to install surveillance devices on residences. They equate smart meters with wiretapping and note wiretapping is illegal in all U.S. states and federal territories. The speaker asserts that allowing a smart meter is tantamount to walking around with a constant webcam on one’s head and accuses the industry of relying on implied consent—the idea that permission is granted if the utility can change the meter, even if residents don’t understand the scope of what’s happening. As a practical step, the speaker advises telling utilities not to change the meter, noting that older meters were billed successfully. They claim to have sent a certified letter denying installation of a smart meter and mention a copy of their letter is available in the video’s description for viewers to adapt. They state post office certified mail is used to obtain a receipt. The speaker concludes that if the meters are installed on every house in America, it would cease to be America.

Christopher Gronsky welcomes Jeff Berwick of the Dollar Vigilante to a conversation hosted at destinationfreedom.org. Gronsky says they typically handle tax-related matters, and he frames the discussion around income tax, since their audience includes Americans worldwide and has expanded to people in Australia, Canada, and the UK. Berwick responds by describing his worldview that government is mind control, using brainwashing to make people believe organizations are legitimate. He says people are told they are born in a place and owe money, and he rejects that framing as ridiculous. He also says these organizations are dangerous and may use violence, including death, if someone tries to run away from extortion. On fear, Berwick says he has heard people are afraid to take steps to remove themselves from a “trap” or “illusion.” He encourages viewers to do the paperwork to remove themselves through destinationfreedom.org and to practice meditation to realize “there is no authority over you.” He links indoctrination to schooling, claiming it trains people for years to believe in a lie about authority. He says that once people understand what they really are, they become less worried. Berwick says he had been cautious recommending Gronsky because he wanted evidence it works. He says members of his Vigilante Insiders Club—higher-level, higher-net-worth subscribers—reported that Gronsky’s process worked for them years ago with no problems. Berwick says that, based on long-term observation, he feels comfortable recommending people take the steps. He adds that increasing participation would “stop feeding the beast,” portraying the income tax as transferring energy and labor to “criminal” and “evil” parties. Gronsky emphasizes that their process is “peaceful,” “out in the open,” and driven by paperwork. He says they help people with IRS issues by reviewing how they communicated, whether they used others’ remedies, and what they’ve done on their own. He notes that people often ask for the law requiring most people to file and pay. He says their classes show the constitutional basis and specifically references Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 as giving exclusive legislative authority “in all cases whatsoever,” including jurisdiction described as the District of Columbia and federal territories. Gronsky argues that the income tax liability arises from how people are classified, describing income tax as an excise tax and the offered privilege as “citizenship of choice,” tied to District of Columbia citizenship. He says the tax system governs banking and other activities and that federal citizenship creates worldwide tax liability. He references the 16th Amendment language “from whatever source derived.” He also addresses the April 15 tax deadline by describing that if people do not file, “nobody at the IRS is thinking about you,” and that IRS work proceeds as generated paperwork and automated timelines tied to Social Security numbers, leading to letters. Gronsky says people who refuse to file should recognize it may not create the impact they expect, but they can leave the “swamp” voluntarily. He cites the idea that income tax does not run government but is collected by the IRS on behalf of central bankers, funding interest and transfer payments on debt. He invites viewers to correct what he calls a mistake: leaving the federal jurisdiction they are participating in. The conversation includes discussion of how people may be handled by intermediaries rather than directly by the IRS. Gronsky recounts an example where an IRS levy allegedly resulted in a bank taking money after an IRS agent said the issue was with the bank. He frames this as a system where parties other than the IRS handle practical consequences. Berwick recommends that viewers disconnect from financing and says fear can be met by taking a breath, recognizing the fear as the feeling of being a slave, and then filing paperwork and “walking away.” He also recommends viewers watch “Jones Plantation” to understand how deception works. Gronsky proposes a future conversation involving Pema from Freedom Law School and referencing Stu Peters, aiming to show a peaceful process and let people compare pathways. He directs viewers to destinationfreedom.org for resources and notes Jeff’s materials via dollarvigilante.com, including dollarvigilante.tv for shadow-banned or hard-to-access content. At the end, Berwick reiterates: if someone is in the US paying taxes and does not live in “Washington District Of Criminals,” they should correct that mistake because it will make life better. He closes by saying it is “that simple,” and Gronsky thanks him, mentioning they will connect through their Telegram group.

There is no law requiring payment of taxes in the US. The IRS manual states they have no jurisdiction over US workers, only those abroad. Share this info and challenge the IRS to prove tax obligations.

The speaker urges rapid downsizing of wealth and assets, especially for anyone who will have a public presence or an active social media profile. The core instruction is to get wealth out of the traditional system and keep it on a minimal, flexible footing so a person can stay “light on your feet” as they fight this good fight. The emphasis is placed on anonymity and mobility: if you have public visibility and your assets are traceable, you are vulnerable. A central recommendation is to move wealth into Bitcoin and to do so in a way that makes it effectively invisible to others. The speaker asserts that once wealth is converted into Bitcoin, “it's in Bitcoin. Right? So nobody knows you have it. Nobody can fucking prove that you got it.” The concern is exposure through centralized avenues: “it's on a centralized exchange in an area where they can obviously see that it's in your name.” The implication is that public names and on-chain records can reveal ownership and make one a target. To protect anonymity, the speaker prescribes using cold storage, an air-gapped multisig wallet setup. The process involves transferring funds into a secure Bitcoin storage solution that is not connected to the internet or any easily traceable accounts. The description suggests creating a robust, private system that resists easy attribution or retrieval by others. The narrative uses a stark metaphor about risk and loss: you might “go on a boat ride and you fucking lose your private keys and it sucks. You lost all your Bitcoin. Oh, well.” This underscores the consequence of losing access credentials in a highly secure storage arrangement—the assets could be irretrievable. Overall, the message centers on two intertwined ideas: (1) reduce and compartmentalize wealth to maintain mobility and privacy, especially for public figures, and (2) use Bitcoin and advanced storage methods (cold storage, air-gapped multisig) to keep wealth hidden from prying eyes, with the acknowledgement that missteps (like losing private keys) result in total loss. The speaker repeats the imperative: “Gotta get your fucking wealth out of the system,” reinforcing the urgency of downscaling and re-holding wealth in a way that minimizes exposure.

To truly own property, whether it's land, a car, or a jet, you need to acquire it under an allodial title. This means you own it outright, without any superior claim, not even from God. I saw this happen when someone bought me a car. They specifically requested an allodial title. The sales manager understood and provided the special paperwork for it. An allodial title ensures absolute ownership. So, if the government wants to build a freeway through your property, they can't touch it if you have this title. The truth is hidden in plain sight, and if you want to know who controls the world, an ebook will unveil that to you.

The video provides a comprehensive overview of Admiralty Law, the concept of a straw man, and power dynamics between individuals and debt collectors or police officers. It emphasizes the importance of understanding the distinction between lawful and legal, as well as the manipulation of language within the legal system. The creation of money through promissory notes and the role of taxation are explored. Viewers are urged to be aware of their rights and not blindly consent to authority. The video also discusses interactions with law enforcement, highlighting individuals' rights to refuse personal information unless driving or suspected of a crime, and the legality of filming police officers in public. It emphasizes that debt collectors have no power unless individuals give it to them through contracts or agreements. Strategies for dealing with debt collectors and bailiffs are provided, including sending template letters and fee schedules, demanding proof of contracts and signed warrants. The importance of knowing one's rights and not allowing unauthorized entry onto one's property is emphasized. The video concludes by urging individuals to educate themselves about the system, work together for a fairer reality, and take action to prevent further erosion of freedoms.

You are not your legal fiction, which is a corporation created at birth. The government uses this legal entity to impose rules and contracts on you. To avoid unwittingly entering into contracts, always rebut any demands or fines by stating "I do not consent." Remember, common law only applies if harm is caused. Everything else is contractual and can be challenged. Stick to the script and protect your rights.

The video discusses recent changes in how Palantir is used to track Americans’ financial information and the potential impact on privacy, in the context of a legislative vote scheduled for the week of April 13. Key points: - Palantir’s Foundry platform, described as Palantir’s civilian platform, has been inside the IRS since 2017. It connects databases containing bank statements, IRS filings, and financial transactions to identify patterns for investigations. It has helped investigators by finding patterns they might miss. - The IRS has paid Palantir more than $200 million for this work. Historically, the use of Foundry was limited to cases that were already open, with investigators having a formal reason to look and an active investigation. - In December 2024, the IRS paid Palantir $1.8 million to build a tool called SNAP, standing for the selection and analytic platform. SNAP is described as taking the human out of the equation, scoring every American taxpayer and generating a ranked list of who the government should target next for audits, collections, and criminal investigations. - In the following months, the IRS paid Palantir an additional $2.25 million to expand SNAP. SNAP reportedly will pull transaction data from platforms like Venmo, Etsy, Depop, and Cash App. The threshold for reporting on these platforms reportedly dropped to $600 this year, expanding the scope of potentially flagged activities (including small-scale transactions such as selling a used couch or freelance dog walking). - There is concern about legality. In June 2025, ten members of Congress wrote to Palantir’s CEO suggesting the program likely violates the Privacy Act of 1974 and federal tax privacy laws, which limit tax information use to tax-related purposes. The IRS’s top lawyer reportedly agreed but was removed from the position two days after making that statement. - Two short-term actions are proposed: 1) Remove oneself from data broker databases to shrink the government’s data footprint, since it can access real-time location data, phone numbers, and spending habits through third-party data brokers without warrants. California residents can use privacy.california.gov/drop to send deletion requests to over 500 data brokers; the service is described as quick (about five minutes). Non-Californians can use services like Incogni or DeleteMe, with caveats about due diligence and potential fees. 2) Contact Rick Crawford, chair of the House Intelligence Committee, to push for warrant protections in FISA reauthorization. The vote is scheduled for the week of April 13. Crawford’s DC office number is (202) 225-4076, and the speaker demonstrates making a call to advocate for warrant requirements. The speaker emphasizes that if the legislation passes without protections, broader discussions about compliance and oversight will be necessary, and encourages viewers to begin by removing data footprints and calling Crawford.