reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Anthony Fauci is accused of having publicly promoted natural origins for COVID-19 while privately being aware of evidence suggesting a lab origin. The speaker argues Fauci should explain why dangerous research was funded by NIAID in Wuhan under inadequate safety standards, apologize, admit risk exceeded benefits, and help design safeguards to prevent a man-made epidemic. The speaker contends Fauci avoided responsibility regarding lockdowns, while officials invoked his authority and his recommendations were presented as science dictates. The speaker cites Fauci’s writings (including 03/14/2020) tying task force recommendations to specific individuals, and additional claims that television influence contributed to closing schools and other restrictions. The speaker asserts Fauci privately faced warnings about lab manipulation. They claim early 2020 a handpicked virologist warned the virus appeared manipulated in a lab, and that participants in a call believed deliberate insertion was possible. They also claim NIH reviewed and approved Wuhan-related experiments, and that a pattern emerged: private alarm, an inquiry about whether NIAID funding related to the suspicious research, rapid public certainty, continued private doubt, and years of resistance to disclosure. The speaker says “Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2” flipped privately doubting lab origin to almost certainly not a laboratory construct, and was used in public to discredit Americans asking the same questions. The speaker alleges Fauci cited that paper publicly without disclosing his role, prior discussions, and editorial comments, and without disclosing doubts persisted privately, including concerns about FOIA and communications. The speaker details a long history of gain-of-function support. They cite 2011 funding involving Ron Fouchier’s avian flu work, describe it as a “tipping point” and say federal biosecurity concerns existed about publishing a road map to bioweapons. The speaker claims NIAID began funding Wuhan bat coronavirus work in 2014, describes later NIAID-supported research combining a bat coronavirus spike with a SARS backbone to infect human airway cells, and claims transmissibility and function increased. They state that in 2018 a proposal involving insertion of a furin cleavage site was submitted, DARPA rejected it as too dangerous, and they claim that when COVID-19 was sequenced in early January 2020, scientists discovered it had a novel furin cleavage site matching the proposed work. The speaker claims Fauci testified to the Senate on 05/11/2021 that NIH did not fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan and says Fauci refused to correct the record. They argue the debate was reduced to semantics while the public asked whether the research was dangerous and whether NIAID supervised it adequately. The speaker also raises allegations about records deletion: an assistant deleted “tons of emails,” despite 2024 testimony denying record deletion, and committee claims of instructions to delete communications (including an email dated 02/02/2020 to Francis Collins). The speaker describes an “auto pin” pardon from President Biden extended back to 2014, and argues it does not rewrite history or erase documents. They warn future pandemics will again tempt officials to hide uncertainty, demand obedience, and invoke science while refusing to admit error—arguing secrecy destroys trust. The speaker says trust can’t be ordered and calls for accountability. Senator Gary Peters and others dispute the hearing’s fairness and character. Peters says the hearing departs from bipartisan oversight, alleging biased, selected efforts to validate predetermined conclusions; blocking minority participation; excluding documents; and selectively releasing records. Peters contrasts this with prior bipartisan biosecurity investigation work that included oversight of risky research and COVID origins. He criticizes the majority’s focus on one individual and argues the committee should also address preparedness and the deterioration of public health capacity, including cuts and workforce reductions. He cites impacts on FDA response to outbreaks, reduced global health programs, and domestic biodefense readiness. The hearing proceeds with assertions from the chairman that the committee’s investigation is transparent, including a website and access claims. Anthony Fauci then refuses to answer questions, invoking the Fifth Amendment after being sworn in and after acknowledging a broad pardon dated January 2025 covering alleged offenses from 01/01/2014 onward related to his federal roles. The chairman repeatedly directs Fauci to answer despite refusal, stating a crime exists for material false statements and that subpoena compliance is required. Fauci continues to decline based on Fifth Amendment rights. During questioning, senators and the chairman ask Fauci about: - Rationale and discussions behind funding COVID-related research in Wuhan and whether he believed a totalitarian country could safely conduct it. - Whether intelligence agencies transferred funds to NIH under interagency agreements and whether NIH conducted research coordinated with intelligence community elements. - Whether Fauci was aware of gain-of-function research related to monkeypox at certain facilities. - Whether scientists at Wuhan Institute of Virology could insert a furin cleavage site. - Whether Wuhan researchers combined SARS backbone and spike proteins to create viruses infecting humans and the risk of creating function-gaining viruses. - Whether labs had American oversight and whether inspectors visited them. - Whether Shi Zhengli had discovered more than 100 unpublished viruses that could be close enough to create COVID-19. - Whether Fauci funded gain-of-function research in other labs globally. - Whether he still stands by prior statements that knowledge benefits outweigh risks, particularly in light of alleged deaths. - Records questions, including whether he deleted federal records, whether communications were deleted at his instruction, and whether he destroyed records after learning of congressional investigations. - Revenue and financial ties, including whether he received royalties tied to COVID IP, whether Gates partnered with NIAID/NIH, and whether funding influenced decisions. - Whether he partnered with Bill Gates on global health initiatives, and whether Gates entities received security clearance, among other governance and biodefense questions. - Whether he attempted to obstruct early treatment alternatives or influenced treatment guidance, including references to ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, and remdesivir. Multiple senators also present extended opening or closing remarks about perceived pandemic harms and failures, while Fauci generally declines to answer based on Fifth Amendment rights. Some members argue the hearing is a biased attempt to prosecute or scapegoat Fauci, while others emphasize accountability, trust, oversight, and unresolved issues about origins, research funding, safety signals, records, and public health decisions. One senator (Johnson) cites 2020 diary entries and alleged internal concerns, and emphasizes pandemic impacts including missed measles vaccinations during shutdowns. Another (Blumenthal) argues the hearing is part of a campaign to rewrite history and smear vaccines, demeaning researchers and targeting public health officials, while insisting Fauci’s legal rights should be respected. Several members reference measurable public health consequences during and after COVID-19, including school disruptions, mask and distancing debates, vaccine hesitancy and other outbreaks, staffing cuts, and preparedness gaps. Some senators read allegations from documents and diary excerpts, including claims about Fauci’s private notes expressing uncertainty about origins and alleged concerns about WHO dependence on China. Others cite claims from internal investigations or external reports regarding VAERS algorithms, FDA actions, and suppression of certain studies. Senators also raise claims about ethical concerns, including allegations that treatment guidance was influenced by conflicts and that safety signals were masked. Later, the chairman orders additional documents inserted into the record, including a letter from the Department of Energy about alleged Bill Gates security clearance during Fauci’s tenure. The chairman also inserts a folder of authorities provided to Fauci, including the pardon. A video is played as part of the hearing’s effort to contrast Fauci’s public and private positions. In the video, a passage from Fauci’s journal entries is presented as contradicting his public statements about wet markets and origin timing. The chairman uses this to argue there was a juxtaposition between private beliefs and public messaging. The hearing ends with the chairman stating future actions are expected, including a vote next week on a contempt resolution, and ongoing legal questions about how Fifth Amendment invocation interacts with testimony and a presidential pardon. The chairman also states that despite the pardon, he will press for answers limited to the pardon period and to questions already directed. Throughout, Fauci repeatedly refuses to answer questions, invoking Fifth Amendment rights, even when directed by the chairman to comply after acknowledging the subpoena and the pardon.

Speaker asserts that "the state, however you define that, the military, CDC, Tony Fauci, Ralph Barack at the University of North Carolina created a weaponized virus. Correct? Gain of function research. They contracted it out to China, and it caused a pandemic around the world once it was released. The government created a weaponized virus that then got out and caused a global pandemic." They ask, "When are we gonna have accountability for that?" They seek accountability for "the COVID era," and for "the CDC has known since 1999 that vaccines cause autism, and they've covered it up for twenty six years." They ask, "How do we begin to have accountability?" and conclude, "You want to call it something different? Truth Commissions, criminal trials? You're I would love to comparing"

Prominent figures like Fauci, Soros, Gates, Zuckerberg, and others are being called out for their alleged involvement in what is claimed to be the largest mass poisoning event in human history. Accountability is being demanded for their roles in this situation.

According to a report sent to Washington, SARS CoV-two was created in a Wuhan lab with unsafe conditions, funded by Fauci. The US intelligence community was actively involved and aware, using groups like In-Q-Tel. This was allegedly done despite the Chinese Communist Party's desire for bioweapon technology. The speaker calls for investigations into public and private partners connected to EcoHealth Alliance and Wuhan, including Meta Bioda and Rosemont Seneca, questioning if the president was involved in a cover-up to protect his son. Fauci allegedly coordinated a cover-up with Peter Dasek on the lab leak theory. Ralph Barack and UC Davis were also allegedly involved. The speaker accuses Fauci of lying about gain-of-function research and suggests he should be in jail. Fauci and others are allegedly profiting from the pandemic. The speaker advocates for focusing on those responsible for the pandemic instead of internal conflicts. Others discuss the potential for future outbreaks and the need for better preparedness and funding for research and vaccine development, including mRNA technology.

In this video, the speaker discusses the findings of a deposition regarding Dr. Fauci's role in the global response to the pandemic. They highlight how a single individual's observations in China led to the implementation of lockdowns worldwide, without any scientific evidence or peer-reviewed studies. The speaker emphasizes the devastating impact of these actions on the economy, education, and small businesses. They argue that this should be major news, but mainstream media is not covering it adequately. The speaker suggests that the United States was brought to its knees by Dr. Fauci's actions, influenced by the Chinese Communist Party.

Anthony Fauci has been accused of funding the Wuhan lab and engaging in a cover-up. Multiple government agencies are allegedly involved in hiding their support for the lab. Despite Congress declassifying information, there is still classified unclassified information being withheld. Emails have emerged showing Fauci's knowledge of gain of function and concerns about the virus's origin. He allegedly lied in hearings, which is a felony. It is claimed that Fauci bypassed the safety committee that should have reviewed the Wuhan funding. These revelations are expected to have serious consequences for Fauci. This is the fourth round of the COVID cover-up.

The speaker expresses outrage over the global death toll of 6,500,000 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. They accuse Anthony Fauci and Peter Daszak of being involved in the pandemic's origins and call for criminal charges and investigations. The speaker questions why Fauci can lie to Congress without consequences while others face contempt charges. They believe that the responsibility lies with individuals within the US government and the Chinese Communist Party. The speaker calls for accountability and suggests that the pandemic was a result of negligence and criminal actions. They mention Peter Daszak's involvement in investigating the lab leak, despite his connection to the lab in Wuhan.

Doctor Fauci was accused of failing in his leadership roles during the pandemic, allegedly covering up the lab leak theory and funding gain-of-function research. Testimonies revealed attempts to hide information, delete emails, and avoid transparency. The speaker criticized Fauci for prioritizing personal interests over public health, eroding trust in the public health system. The speaker vowed to seek accountability despite ongoing cover-up efforts.

The speaker discusses the alleged cover-up surrounding the origins of COVID-19. They claim that the US government, led by Anthony Fauci, funded dangerous gain-of-function research in China, which involved combining viruses to create a new super virus. They highlight the lack of transparency and exemptions given to this research, as well as the reopening of the door for it to continue. The speaker emphasizes the need for access to the deliberations and funding decisions. They also criticize the actions of Peter Daszak, who allegedly funneled money to Wuhan and continues to receive grants. The speaker believes there has been a significant cover-up and calls for a ban on further funding.

The speaker accuses Dr. Anthony Fauci of knowing that the drug remdesivir would be deadly and deliberately denying effective treatments for COVID-19. They claim that treatments like zinc, hydroxychloroquine, and ivermectin, which have been shown to reduce the spread of the disease, were not used. They also allege that remdesivir causes kidney and organ failure and that it was responsible for many deaths during the pandemic. The speaker suggests that the pharmaceutical companies and healthcare organizations should be held liable for the damage caused by their products and actions. They mention the deaths of two teenage boys after receiving the Pfizer vaccine and question the safety and effectiveness of vaccines for children. The speaker accuses Dr. Fauci, Ralph Barrick, and Peter Daszak of colluding to create and weaponize the coronavirus. They argue that these actions constitute genocide and crimes against humanity. They call for the prosecution of those involved and the destruction of the system that allows such crimes to occur.

In this video, the speaker addresses Congress and the Biden administration, emphasizing the serious implications of the SARS CoV 2 origin narrative. They highlight how the suppression of information regarding HIV 1 inserts and the furin cleavage site delayed the global response to the pandemic. The speaker accuses officials like Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins of prioritizing their own protection over the well-being of the public. They argue that justice for the millions of American victims should be prioritized over national security interests or censorship. The speaker concludes by expressing their determination to speak out on behalf of those who cannot, emphasizing their commitment to truth and justice.

Fauci, Soros, Gates, Zuckerberg, and others must be held accountable for their involvement in what is claimed to be the largest mass poisoning in human history.

People are losing security clearances and government contracts, but this is not enough. Dr. Fauci is responsible for the death of millions, and merely losing his job is insufficient. USAID is funding a radical Marxist agenda globally, and business loans are being given to children. Social Security and Medicare payments are being sent overseas and to dead people, including 50-year-olds. No one has been held accountable for any of this.

COVID-19 had telltale signs of being made in a laboratory from the beginning. The CIA has stated the virus came from a lab, but what they didn't say is that it was almost surely made in a US laboratory, possibly at the University of North Carolina, and may have been tested in a Chinese laboratory. The Biden administration hid this. One theory is that US scientists wanted to test the virus on a specific bat population in the Wuhan facility. The FBI should crack the case, as it is an inside US job. The University of North Carolina is withholding 2019 emails and fighting to keep them from public scrutiny. There is reason to believe that Tony Fauci funded reckless, dangerous research that went awry.

We need to hold accountable individuals like Fauci, George Soros, Bill Gates, and Mark Zuckerberg for their roles in what is being called the greatest mass poisoning in history due to the COVID-19 vaccines. These vaccines are deemed unsafe and defective, with claims that they have harmed billions globally. The shots are described as toxic, and there is a call to stop their distribution worldwide. There are concerns about the potential introduction of harmful substances into our food supply. Immediate action is urged to arrest those responsible for promoting these vaccines.

Anthony Fauci's involvement in funding the Wuhan lab is being covered up by multiple government agencies. Despite Congress declassifying information, I am still being denied access to classified and unclassified information. Evidence suggests that Fauci lied in hearings and knew about the lab's activities. Emails reveal his concerns about the manipulated virus and its origins. He dismissed these concerns for the past three years. Fauci bypassed the safety committee that should have reviewed the funding, allowing it to proceed unchecked. This revelation is significant and could lead to Fauci's downfall.

Anthony Fauci's involvement in funding the Wuhan lab is being covered up by multiple government agencies. Despite Congress declassifying information, I am still being denied access to classified and unclassified information. However, evidence shows that Fauci lied in hearings and knew about the lab's activities. Emails reveal his concerns about the manipulated virus and its origins in Wuhan. He dismissed these concerns for the past three years. Additionally, Fauci bypassed the safety committee that should have reviewed the funding, which is a significant revelation. Ultimately, this could lead to the downfall of Anthony Fauci.

The speaker is working with Jay Bhattacharya and Secretary Kennedy to investigate US-funded gain of function research, including at the Wuhan lab, and its potential link to the COVID-19 pandemic. They aim to provide evidence showing why ending this research is in the American people's best interest. The speaker claims that Anthony Fauci funded the pandemic and then denied it under oath to Senator Rand Paul. They also suggest Fauci sought a preemptive pardon from President Biden. The speaker was attacked for warning against US-funded biolabs in Ukraine, fearing potential pathogen releases. The speaker questions why the intelligence community was reluctant to conclude that COVID-19 originated in a lab, suggesting politicization of intelligence to meet objectives or influence policy. They draw a parallel to the intelligence used to justify the Iraq regime change war and its consequences. The speaker emphasizes the need to address these issues within the intelligence community and highlights the importance of leadership.

Doctor Fauci misled the country by withholding key information about the origins of the virus. He knew American tax dollars funded a lab in Wuhan conducting gain-of-function research. Despite this, he did not disclose the lab's deficiencies or compliance issues. Fauci organized a conference call with virologists who changed their tune on the lab leak theory shortly after. The government failed to share the truth, leading to misinformation about the virus's origins. The Director of National Intelligence believes Fauci and Collins withheld information to avoid scrutiny over their relationships with the lab in China.

Fauci should be in prison for mishandling the pandemic. He caused countries in Africa to have no COVID deaths, while shutting down our economy and schools, leading to a lost generation's education. This also resulted in the largest wealth transfer ever. Additionally, a million people died.

COVID-19 originated in a lab, and it took too long to acknowledge this due to the suppression of debate through accusations of racism. Big tech censored discussions about the virus's origins in the name of preventing misinformation, which ironically led to more confusion. We must learn from this history to avoid repeating mistakes. As president, I commit to holding accountable those responsible for the pandemic's origin, including using financial measures against the CCP and investigating U.S. officials who may have contributed to the crisis through gain-of-function research. It's time to move beyond complaints and focus on solutions. You have my commitment to do just that.

President Biden is considering pardoning Dr. Anthony Fauci. During a congressional hearing, Senator Paul questioned Fauci about his May 11th statement regarding NIH funding for gain-of-function research in Wuhan. Fauci firmly stated he has never lied to Congress and does not retract his statement. Senator Paul accused Fauci of being responsible for the pandemic, which he claims resulted in millions of deaths and significant financial costs. He argued that Fauci's funding of gain-of-function research contributed to the virus's transmissibility in humans. Fauci countered that while some conspiracy theories are false, many hold truth, and suggested that it is Senator Paul who is misleading the public.

Anthony Fauci's actions have raised serious concerns, as many believe he put people at risk without their consent. The research linked to the pandemic has resulted in immense loss, with estimates of 20 million deaths and a staggering economic cost of $25 trillion. There are suspicions that Fauci would rather promote falsehoods than address these issues openly.

In this video, the speaker discusses their investigation into the origins of COVID-19. They claim that the virus was created in a lab in Wuhan, China, and that Dr. Anthony Fauci funded it. They also suggest that the US intelligence community was aware of this. The speaker calls for investigations into the involvement of various organizations and individuals, including Ralph Barrick and UC Davis. They criticize Fauci for allegedly coordinating a cover-up and lying about gain-of-function research. The speaker believes that Fauci should be held accountable for the millions of deaths caused by the pandemic. The video also includes statements from Fauci about the importance of preparing for epidemics and the potential of mRNA vaccines.

Millions dead, no arrests made. Anthony Fauci compared to J. Edgar Hoover for authoritarian tendencies. Fauci under constant security, receiving large sums of money during pandemic. Conflict of interest with vaccine manufacturers. Accusations of lying to congress. Concerns about double standards and potential chaos in the country. Ideology over skin color may lead to trouble.