reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The transcript presents a cascade of allegations and observations surrounding the COVID-19 outbreak and related operations: - It is claimed that “every time there is something that comes out that is in fact false information that is starting to actually hamper our ability to address the pandemic,” and that there are two months during which “we have all these modern technologies” in place to respond after false information emerges. - A suggestion is made that the outbreak was simulated or anticipated two months before it began, with dialogue implying the virus had already circulated for two months, and that such foresight was connected to a simulated scenario tied to the Wuhan military games in October 2019. - The speakers allege that information about a novel coronavirus with a “fern cleavage site insertion” leaked during the Wuhan games, and that “they” knew this and prepared a cover-up over the next two months, launching a tabletop exercise with media, intelligence agencies, the Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum, and others. - They describe a “tabletop exercise” for a pandemic, described as event two zero one, conducted with pharmaceutical executives, the deputy director of the CIA (who later became the director of national intelligence), Avril Haines, and others. They claim this exercise was run “the week of the Wuhan games,” and that it involved a simulated global spread beginning with a coronavirus outbreak and evolving into a pandemic. - The dialogue asserts that the exercise was “hosted at Johns Hopkins, funded by Bill Gates,” and references a scenario where pigs in Brazil, not pangolins in China, are the initial hosts, with the simulation detailing widespread illness, hospitalizations, and international travel turning local epidemics into a global pandemic. - They allege that the Central Intelligence Agency, in 2015, under Avril Haines (then deputy director), approached Ralph Baric to discuss gain-of-function research on coronaviruses, and that Baric was in contact with the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s Shi Zhengli (the “Bat Lady”) regarding a possible project on coronavirus evolution in humans. - The speakers question Haines’s qualifications, noting she is described as a physicist and “research engineer,” and suggesting she could run the CIA or the entire intelligence community, including participating in a coronavirus response simulation. - They cite today’s reports about social media platforms detecting and removing accounts spreading pandemic-related misinformation, and argue that the deputy director of the CIA—who later became DNI—led a pre-pandemic censorship conference about pressuring social media to ban conspiracy theories that the virus originated from a lab or was linked to U.S. military projects. - The overall narrative ties together claims of advance knowledge, the existence of pre-pandemic simulations (event 201), connections between Johns Hopkins, the Gates Foundation, NATO, and corporate media, and the involvement of Avril Haines in both pre-pandemic discussions and post-pandemic censorship efforts.

Event 201 was a simulation right before COVID hit, a drill for handling pandemics, but focused on imposing censorship and turning America totalitarian. My book reveals 22 such simulations, CIA-sponsored, with Fauci and Bill Gates playing key roles. Gates invited Fauci to his home, proposing a partnership to "vaccinize the world." These simulations involved hundreds of thousands—police, healthcare workers—drilled on censorship, tracking, and control, effectively practicing a coup against American democracy. The CIA's techniques for causing chaos in indigenous countries—shattering society, destroying the economy—were used to impose a lockdown and induce Stockholm Syndrome. CIA mind control experiments like the Milgram experiment showed that authority figures, like doctors, could compel 67% of people to violate their conscience. Doctors were put in charge, ordering us what to do, with direct CIA involvement in creating these scenarios alongside Gates and Fauci.

In this video, the speaker discusses a simulation event that took place in October 2019, hosted by Bill Gates, Thao Chi, and April Hayes. The last simulation focused on pandemic planning and the suppression of freedom of speech. The speaker mentions that COVID-19 was likely circulating by mid-September, but the Chinese government restricted information about it. They also mention that Bill Gates bought and sold shares of BioNTech vaccine, which later became the Pfizer vaccine. The speaker suggests a connection between Gates' actions and the announcement that the vaccine didn't work. They also mention that Gates provided funding to the speaker's institution.

In a pandemic simulation called event two zero one, the CIA discussed using the pandemic as an opportunity to limit free speech and control government criticism. They aim to flood communication channels with trusted sources and ensure access to specific information. These simulations have been conducted since 2001, with the intention of executing a coup d'etat against American democracy and the bill of rights. This raises concerns about the CIA's actions and their potential impact on society.

The discussion connects multiple individuals and organizations to alleged covert intelligence activity and influence over major events. It begins by referencing Robert F. Kennedy’s campaign and Teddy Kennedy’s chief counsel, then claims that attorney Jeffrey Blattner (executive chairman of HIAS) told Ted Kennedy not to run against incumbent Linda B. Johnson, after which Robert Kennedy ran anyway. The transcript then links Jules Kroll to Robert Kennedy’s campaign team and asserts that Jules Kroll is IDF unit 82,300 while Jeffrey Blattner is Mossad. It claims that in 1972 Jules Kroll and his wife Lynn Korda Kroll began a private intelligence operation called J. Kroll and Associates, which later became Kroll Incorporated and grew into a major private intelligence and investigative firm. The speaker says Kroll and K2 Intelligence are related “distinction without a difference,” and that Kroll worked for clients including the Vatican and Bernie Madoff, as well as being used in cases such as Harvey Weinstein investigations. The transcript also claims that the firm’s Tel Aviv spinoff later had a chief technology officer who was an IDF sergeant in unit 82,300, described as an Israeli signals intelligence equivalent to the NSA. The “plot” relevance is tied to the speaker’s claim that Kroll’s wife had a role in UJA Federation (United Jewish Appeal), and it expands into UJA Federation’s alleged connections to broader power networks. It identifies Larry Silverstein as former chairman of UJA Federation (1994–1997), describes him as connected to “old money” Jewish families and Mossad-related figures, and brings in Brian Michael Jenkins (described as deputy chairman of Kroll) and L. Paul Bremer. The transcript claims French intelligence suspected Jenkins and Bremer of promoting threat prevention strategies and then causing attacks when organizations didn’t adopt them. It further states that the New York Port Authority hired Kroll in 1993 to conduct a terrorism vulnerability threat analysis for the World Trade Center Plaza and that the report included a line item suggesting (it said) it was unlikely but possible that the towers could be vulnerable to being hit by jet airliners. The transcript then asserts the Port Authority hired Kroll to run security for the World Trade Center Plaza immediately after Jenkins’ report, and links that year to Larry Silverstein becoming president of UJA Federation. A Mossad whistleblower is introduced: Victor Ostrovsky. The transcript says Ostrovsky, after serving in the Israeli Defense Force beginning at age 14 and becoming a Mossad agent for fourteen months, became a “burn notice”/whistleblower and wrote two books: *By Way of Deception* and *The Other Side of Deception*. It claims the books’ content was managed to avoid “mass scale antisemitism,” and lists ADL (Jonathan Greenblatt), APAC, and UJA as entities said to be arms of Mossad, citing social media training claims and appointment/training activities mentioned in the transcript. The transcript then moves to post–September 11 financial and structural changes, asserting that Solomon Smith Barney (described as the largest tenant of World Trade Center Building 7) was “crashed” and consolidated, and it claims $2.3 trillion referenced by Donald Rumsfeld was consolidated among Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, BlackRock, Blackstone, Apollo, and a little to Goldman Sachs. It states there were 3,800 Jews who worked in both towers and claims only four Jewish deaths were reported on 09/11, including Daniel Lewin (cofounder of Akamai) described as reportedly the first 9/11 casualty and said to be IDF. Additional claims focus on corporate ownership: the transcript asks who is the largest shareholder of BlackRock and asserts Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley ownership (with Merrill Lynch said to own 45%), and it links BlackRock’s founding to Steven Schwarzman of Blackstone, and Rob Capito as UJA Federation. It further asserts connections among Blackstone, BlackRock, Apollo Global Management, Larry Silverstein, and James Tisch, alongside Mark Rich (born Marcel Reich), and describes Mark Rich as having brokered deals involving Iran, Israel, and the Ayatollah through Mossad agents that allegedly reduced oil costs despite US sanctions. It then identifies Michael Chertoff as “second generation Mossad” and claims he coauthored the Patriot Act with provisions to protect Israel from future investigation, later appointing him as secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and later chairman of BAE Systems. The transcript claims Rumsfeld later chaired a pharmaceutical company (Eli Lilly) and sat on boards connected to Investor AB. The discussion culminates in claims about COVID-19: it introduces Alvin Krongard, alleging he controls conservative media, helped plan and cover up COVID, and made trades before September 11 and before related outcomes. It asserts that BlackRock’s Aladdin (and similar tools “In-Q-Tel” and “Lab 72/Lab 41”) was used to model pandemic impacts, and claims Avril Haines (described as working directly for Tony Blinken) was sent to “Event 201” to seize control of the global financial system. Finally, it asserts COVID was “calibrated” to affect certain populations through ACE2 receptor polymorphisms, and it connects Sergei Brin and 23andMe to access to patient DNA data used for calibration. The transcript ends mid-sentence as it continues discussing these claims.

In October 2019, an event called event 201 took place in New York, simulating a pandemic. The speaker questions why the CIA was involved, suggesting they want to use the pandemic as an excuse to limit free speech and control the population. They mention that the CIA discussed restricting criticism of government policies and the lab leak theory before the Wuhan outbreak. Another speaker suggests flooding communication channels with trusted sources instead of controlling communication. The speaker expresses concern about the CIA using future pandemics to undermine American democracy and the bill of rights.

The discussion ties together a web of individuals, organizations, and events to present a claim-driven narrative about control of politics, security, finance, and health crises. Key figures and their alleged connections: - Jules Kroll: On Robert Kennedy’s campaign staff; an IDF Unit 82,00 agent. With his wife Lynn Korda Kroll, he founded J. Kroll and Associates (later Kroll Incorporated) and then K2 Intelligence with his son Jeremy. Kroll reportedly worked for the Vatican, Bernie Madoff, Harvey Weinstein (via Black Cube), and other major cases; a chief technology officer in Kroll’s Tel Aviv spin-off allegedly came from IDF signals intelligence. - Jeffrey Blattner: Chief counsel to Ted Kennedy; executive chairman of HIAS; described as central to the plot. - UJA Federation (United Jewish Appeal): Described as a critical, undercredited organization tied to the plot; Larry Silverstein is named as former chairman (1994–1997). The claim extends to UJA’s alleged Mossad alignment rather than a pure philanthropic lobby. - Larry Silverstein: Chairman of UJA Federation (1994–1997) and owner of the World Trade Center towers; linked to other financial and political actors in the narrative. - Warburg family: Mentioned as early leadership of UJA; ties to Warburg Pincus and broader Jewish financial networks. - Tony Blinken: Described as a direct descendant of the Warburg clan; linked to Mossad-inflected networks via family connections. - Mark Rowan (Apollo Global Management), Leon Black (former Apollo chair), James Tisch: Named as figures connected to UJA and to financial consolidation post-9/11, including relationships to Epstein and related entities. - Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley: Identified as pivotal players around 9/11 with connections to World Trade Center security contracting and consolidations that allegedly funded later financial behemoths (BlackRock, Blackstone, Apollo). - BlackRock, Blackstone, Apollo, and related firms: Described as products of post-9/11 consolidation, with alleged Mossad founders or ties through various executives; linked to funding and ownership structures of today’s financial system. - Alvin Krongard (Krongard): Alleged to control conservative media and to have inside-traded around 9/11; connected to Alex Brown and to the broader pandemic and financial narratives. - Michael Chertoff and Philip Zelikow: Named as key figures in surveillance, Patriot Act architecture, and the 9/11 and post-9/11 security/legal framework; Chertoff is described as second-generation Mossad, involved with DHS and later corporate boards. - Johns Hopkins, Carlyle Group, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation: Linked to pandemic planning and global health policy through a web of relationships; Carlyle’s David Rubenstein and Johns Hopkins are cited as central nodes in coordinating policy and funding. - Jeffrey Epstein connections and related entities: Mentioned as part of the broader network. - Viktor Ostrovsky (Mossad whistleblower): Cited for his books detailing Mossad’s global influence and for claims about how Israel’s intelligence apparatus interacts with global policy and law enforcement. - Aladdin (BlackRock’s platform): Described as the AI/quantum platform used to model financial and crisis scenarios; alleged to have been used to plan or simulate impacts of crises like a pandemic. - Event 201 and related figures (e.g., Avril Haines): Described as part of a coordinated effort to influence and seize control of the global financial system in the wake of crises. Chronology and claimed causal threads: - 1968–1972: Jules Kroll’s path from campaign staff to private intelligence to Kroll, Inc., with ties to IDF and Mossad-linked figures; Jeffrey Blattner’s roles tied to Kennedy politics and HIAS. - 1990s–2000s: Kroll’s expansion (Kroll, K2 Intelligence; Tel Aviv spin-off); Larry Silverstein’s leadership in UJA Federation; Brian Michael Jenkins and L. Paul Bremer’s roles in security analysis for World Trade Center planning; post-9/11 consolidation among major financial firms (Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley) leading to BlackRock, Blackstone, Apollo. - Post-9/11: Claims of insider trading patterns and the consolidation of financial power; ties to Mossad-linked individuals and entities; discussion of Mark Rich’s pardon and energy/policy maneuverings involving Iran, Israel, and sanctions. - COVID-19 era: Allegations that COVID was engineered or calibrated via genetic/polymorphic targeting (ACE2 receptor) with involvement from 23andMe’s linking data and a chain of actors (Gates Foundation, Rockefeller-associated groups, Carlyle Group, DHS-linked individuals); use of Aladdin to model crises; Avril Haines cited in Event 201 alignment; claims of deliberate health and economic disruption to reshape global systems. The speakers emphasize interwoven elite families, intelligence agencies, and financial behemoths as the unseen drivers behind major historical events, asserting deep Mossad and Israeli-lobby connectivity across politics, infrastructure, and health policy.

Speaker 0 notes: “Have them write the information.” Speaker 1 points out that two people were sitting together: George Gao, director general of the Chinese CDC, and the deputy director of the CIA, who later became head of the entire intelligence community, at an event during the Wuhan military games two months before the Wuhan outbreak. They remark on how conveniently they were seated near each other given how closely they would coordinate two months later. In this segment, social media is mentioned 19 times. Speaker 2 comments that social media is now the primary channel for news, that interruptions to platforms could curb misinformation but also limit access to legitimate sources, and that health ministries worldwide are trying to combat misinformation and disinformation. Speaker 1 describes the tabletop exercise: the deputy director of the CIA becomes head of the ODNI as soon as Biden takes office and is dealing with social media issues. The speaker notes that George Gao attended the exercise, asking why the simulation—which was about an animal-borne coronavirus outbreak in Latin America—had the China CDC head at the table and the U.S. ODNI head present, while the outbreak was said to start in Brazil, and there were no Latin American health officials present. The president of the UPS foundation is mentioned as the only Latin-named figure. The speaker questions why the Brazil CDC director isn’t in the exercise if it’s simulating a Latin American outbreak and points to the arrangement as contradictory to the premise. Speaker 3 repeats that experts agree new disinformation campaigns are generated daily, describing the problem as huge and potentially undermining pandemic response and governance. Speaker 1 emphasizes disinformation keeping us from ending the pandemic, noting the Wuhan games are ongoing in Wuhan, and describing rumors that the US military engineered the virus and that USAID funded work, with a web of claims about public health, vaccines, and pharmaceutical company misdeeds. The speaker asserts that Pfizer, Moderna, and Gates Foundation funding are involved, including claims that Moderna patented the coronavirus vaccine before the outbreak and that Moderna is a Pentagon arm with no prior successful vaccine. Speaker 2 warns that unrest from false rumors and divisive messaging is rising and undermining response efforts as trust declines. Speaker 1 mentions the “China CDC, in charge of the Wuhan lab,” and notes that healthcare workers, if poorly trained, might give wrong information or say “I don’t know,” which erodes public trust. Speaker 0 recalls a Sierra Leone radio interview about whether Ebola was man-made, highlighting the importance of the TOT (tabletop exercise) and ensuring that nobody suspects a man-made origin. Speaker 4: Proposes steps to prevent spreading misinformation on social media by collaborating with telecommunications companies to control information access and ensuring a trusted source floods the zone with messaging, including trained influential community leaders and health workers to disseminate the desired messaging. Speaker 1 questions the idea of flooding the zone with messaging and notes the need for a rapid response to disinformation, while acknowledging that there are intelligence sources identifying foreign disinformation campaigns as part of a larger effort to address the pandemic.

In a pandemic simulation called Event 201, the CIA discussed using the pandemic as an opportunity to limit free speech and control communication. They aim to prevent criticism of government policies and discussions about a lab leak. The CIA has been conducting these simulations since 2001, practicing how to execute a coup d'etat against American democracy and the bill of rights. This raises concerns about their intentions and actions.

"In 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation had published a report about technology in the future, and one of the scenarios was a flu pandemic. And what we followed in 2020 was exactly what was written out for that script." "fall twenty nineteen, the Johns Hopkins, the Gates Foundation, and the World Economic Forum put together a three and a half hour event online called event two zero one." "Critical really critical a so called tabletop exercise." "Nothing about health. Nothing about vitamin d, good nutrition, repurposed available drugs." "It was all about suppressing dissent. It was all about militarization of society." "It was led by Averell Haynes who had been with the CIA." "In my view, clearly, explicitly, Operation Warp Speed was a military operation." "Department of Defense was over health and human services and over the pharmaceutical industry."

The discussion threads a complex web of individuals, organizations, and alleged plots spanning the Kennedy era through contemporary finance, intelligence, and public health events. The speakers assert that Jules Kroll and Jeffrey Blattner are central to a continuing plot, with Kroll connected to Robert F. Kennedy’s campaign and Blattner as Teddy Kennedy’s chief counsel and chairman of HIAS, and with both tied to a broader border-invasion strategy attributed to Cloward and Piven. Jules Kroll is described as IDF Unit 82,200 and as founding Kroll Associates, later Kroll Inc., then K2 Intelligence, with a Tel Aviv spinoff. Blattner is identified as Mossad-linked, and as chief counsel to Ted Kennedy and an attorney who advised Robert not to run against incumbent Lyndon B. Johnson. Kroll’s wife, Lynn Korda Kroll, is described as former vice chair of UJA Federation, linking Kroll to Larry Silverstein and to the UJA’s influence. The narrative then traces a long arc: Jules Kroll’s private intelligence enterprise allegedly expanding into global operations involving Vatican business, Bernie Madoff, Harvey Weinstein, and Black Cube, with Kroll and its offshoots connected to Mossad-linked operations and Israeli signals intelligence (IDF unit 82,000). In 2010, Jules and his son Jeremy allegedly launched K2 Intelligence, with a Tel Aviv spin-off and an IDF chief technology officer involved in signals intelligence. The conversation then links these individuals to Larry Silverstein, former chairman of UJA Federation (1994–1997), and to Warburg as the first chairman of UJA. Tony Blinken’s lineage to the Warburg clan is noted. A key throughline asserts that Brian Michael Jenkins (former deputy chairman of Kroll), linked to Rand Corporation and MKUltra-era work under Alan Dulles, is alleged to be a conspirator behind September 11 investigations and events. Jenkins is said to have prepared an analysis for the New York Port Authority that foreshadowed vulnerability of the World Trade Center to jet strikes, and the Port Authority allegedly hired Kroll to manage security for the World Trade Center Plaza, while Larry Silverstein rose to UJA Federation presidency. Victor Ostrovsky, a Massad whistleblower, is cited to explain Mossad’s control over various organizations including ADL, APAC, and UJA as Mossad arms, and to claim Mossad’s influence over U.S. elections and federal law enforcement. The panel asserts that APAC’s political wins and ADL’s FBI training programs illustrate Mossad control. The group asserts that private equity firms BlackRock, Blackstone, Apollo Global Management, and others arose post–9/11, funded by Mossad-connected figures, with ownership links to Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley. It is claimed that Merrill Lynch owns 45% of BlackRock, that Morgan Stanley occupied a floor in Tower 2, and that Solomon Smith Barney was the largest tenant of the World Trade Center—that the 9/11 fallout led to consolidations that benefited BlackRock, Blackstone, Apollo, and Goldman Sachs. The discussion names Mark Rich (Marcel Reich) as the Ashkenazi founder who obtained a pardon for dealings with Iran post–9/11 and claims collaboration among Mossad and U.S. actors through Mark Rich’s network. Michael Chertoff is described as second-generation Mossad and chief coauthor of the Patriot Act; his family background includes involvement with Operation Magic Carpet. Philip Zelikow is named as the 9/11 commission associate, and Avril Haines is described as a Mossad asset tied to Event 201, which the speakers connect to planning and execution of a new global financial reset. Event 201 is paired with the use of Aladdin, BlackRock’s AI/quantum platform, to model financial fallout and the pandemic’s impact, with the Bank of Israel adopting Aladdin in 2019. An alleged collaboration among In-Q-Tel and Lab 41, plus Mossad assets, is claimed to have guided the COVID-19 pandemic’s targeted impact. The speaker connects Johns Hopkins University leadership, the Carlyle Group, and prominent figures like David Rubenstein to this broader scheme and asserts that COVID-19 was engineered and managed through a fusion of intelligence, finance, and public health institutions. Throughout, the speakers insist on the centrality of Mossad, UJA Federation, and major private equity and financial players in shaping U.S. policy, security, and pandemic response, asserting deep, coordinating influence across multiple eras and events.

In 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation published a document predicting a pandemic like COVID-19. It described a scenario where governments imposed strict measures, citizens gave up privacy for safety, and misinformation spread. Event 201, a simulation hosted in 2019, eerily mirrored the pandemic. Experts warned of a highly infectious virus causing global catastrophe. The current situation is seen as a result of long-term planning.

In a pandemic simulation called event two zero one, the CIA discussed using the pandemic as an opportunity to limit free speech and control communication. They aim to prevent criticism of government policies and discussions about a lab leak. The CIA has been conducting these simulations since 2001, practicing how to use a future pandemic to undermine democracy and individual rights. This raises concerns about their intentions and actions.

- Gain of function research is a disaster that has given us diseases, and there is evidence that even Spanish flu came from vaccine research. HIV may also have come from a vaccine program. - Event 201 was a simulation right before COVID hit that focused on turning America into a totalitarian state and imposing censorship. There have been 22 of these simulations, sponsored by the CIA, with Fauci and Bill Gates playing key roles. Gates proposed a partnership with Fauci to vaccinate the world. These simulations involved hundreds of thousands of people, including police officers and healthcare workers, and were a way of practicing a coup d'etat against American democracy. - Tulsi Gabbard is working with someone who says the creation of weaponized SARS COVID goes back to Fauci and was an Obama project. The director of national intelligence is investigating Fauci for his role in creating COVID-19. - The Trump administration, through Kennedy and Gabbard, is preparing to bring forward irrefutable evidence that COVID-19 was made in the USA and shipped to China for plausible deniability as a political coup d'etat against the West. Trump is moving to reveal that COVID was made by Democrat globalists as a weapon against the West. - Methylene blue increases electrochemical activity and gives a tingling sensation.

The transcript discusses a 2010 Rockefeller Foundation document titled Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development, focusing on a scenario called Lockstep. In this scenario, a pandemic strikes in 2012, overwhelming even the best-prepared nations. Approximately 20% of the global population becomes infected and about 8 million people die within seven months. The pandemic devastates economies as international travel and global supply chains collapse, and even developed countries struggle with containment. China is highlighted as having greater success due to rapid, mandatory quarantines and near-closed borders, which saves millions of lives and enables a faster post-pandemic recovery. The account notes that highly intrusive real-time tracking of a largely compliant population was key to lifting lockdowns in Wuhan. The document also asserts that during the pandemic, leaders worldwide imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from mandatory mask-wearing to temperature checks at entry points to communal spaces. Even after the pandemic fades, there is a lasting shift toward more authoritarian control and oversight, with citizens accepting reduced sovereignty and privacy in exchange for safety and stability. In developed countries, biometric IDs and a suite of new regulations are introduced to restore order and economic growth, with the overall message that increased oversight helps achieve stability. The transcript then shifts to Event 201, a high-level pandemic exercise held on October 18, 2019, organized by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The exercise simulated the consequences of a pandemic and the societal and economic challenges it would pose, using a coronavirus-like pathogen codenamed Caps. Participants describe how a significant portion of identified cases require hospitalization, causing strain on health systems. They note that some individuals with mild symptoms can still spread the virus unknowingly, and emphasize that disinformation and misinformation undermine the response. There is discussion about how governments, international organizations, and businesses should counter misinformation and ensure reliable information reaches the public. It’s noted that social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook have identified and removed a large number of accounts spreading disinformation about the outbreak. Some participants argue that strong measures to manage information are necessary, even if it means restricting access to information, to prevent misinformation from jeopardizing the pandemic response or causing political instability. The video then intersperses commentary questioning the coincidence that the 2019 exercise apparently anticipated the 2020 outbreak, with a skeptical tone about whether the scenario was preplanned or predictive. Additional voices from public health organizations warn that an epidemic—whether naturally caused or intentionally—could cause massive harm, with the possibility of ten million excess deaths. A final note reflects on the sense that the world was already prepared in many ways before 2020, suggesting that the pandemic response was part of a long-standing preparation.

There's evidence that the government colluded with social media to spread misinformation and suppress alternative COVID treatments and vaccine side effects. This was pre-planned by an elite group, as shown by Event 201, a simulation before the pandemic. These simulations, sponsored by the CIA, involved practicing censorship, tracking, and control, essentially rehearsing a coup against American democracy. Techniques mirror CIA tactics to destabilize societies, creating chaos and imposing centralized control. Bill Gates proposed a partnership with Fauci to vaccinate the world. The CIA conducted mind control experiments, like the Milgram experiment, demonstrating that people will violate their conscience under authority. They knew what they were doing. Studies link COVID vaccines to alarming syndromes and increased risks of autism and neurological disorders in children, mirroring warnings the FDA issued long before the rollout. This is their population control program.

The last major pandemic simulation occurred in October 2019, hosted by Bill Gates and others, focusing on pandemic management and freedom of speech. At that time, COVID-19 was not widely known, but it was likely circulating by mid-September. The Chinese government took down data from a lab linked to the virus around that time, indicating awareness of its spread. Shortly after the simulation, Gates sold 87% of his shares in BioNTech, which developed the Pfizer vaccine, making a significant profit. A week later, it was announced that the vaccine was ineffective. This sequence of events raises questions about the motivations and timing of actions taken by key figures during the pandemic.

The World Health Organization (WHO) allegedly conducted a two-day global simulation called Exercise Polaris, involving 15 countries and 350 experts, to test its Global Health Emergency Core (GHEC). This is framed as a "pandemic treaty dress rehearsal" by some, reminiscent of Event 201, a 2019 pandemic drill by Gates, the World Economic Forum, and others that preceded COVID-19. Critics claim the elite are planning a viral outbreak targeting the young, potentially a lab-created virus, to implement lockdowns and digital IDs. They cite a "physician" who claims Exercise Polaris is a blueprint for unleashing a virus that targets children, causing high fevers and lung failure. This individual alleges the virus is already in development, referencing models from 2022 and a hushed-up scare in Edmonton. Concerns are raised about efforts to control information and increase trust in government, similar to New Zealand's approach under Jacinda Ardern. The speaker urges viewers to resist digital IDs and wake up to the elite's agenda, accusing them of engineering problems to control the population.

- Gain of function research is a disaster that has given us diseases like Lyme disease, COVID, and RSV. There is evidence that even Spanish flu came from vaccine research. Medical and vaccine research has created some of the worst plagues in history, and HIV may have come from a vaccine program. - Event 201 was a simulation before COVID that focused on turning America into a totalitarian state and imposing censorship. There have been 22 of these CIA-sponsored simulations, with Fauci and Bill Gates playing key roles. Gates proposed a partnership with Fauci to vaccinate the world. These drills involved hundreds of thousands of people and practiced a coup d'etat against American democracy. - Tulsi Gabbard is working with someone who says the creation of weaponized SARS COVID goes back to Fauci and was an Obama project. The Director of National Intelligence is investigating Fauci's role in creating COVID-19. Evidence suggests COVID was made in the USA and shipped to Wuhan for plausible deniability as a political coup against the West. Trump is moving to reveal that COVID was made by Democrat globalists as a weapon against the West. - Methylene blue increases electrochemical activity and creates an out-of-body experience.

Deagle.com was officially operated by Doctor Edwin A. Deagle Jr. In 2014, deagle.com published predictions of massive, abrupt population declines before 2025, mostly in Western countries, and the predictions were regularly updated for over five years. After the 2020 lockdowns, the page was removed from the website but remained accessible via the Wayback Machine. The site is described as having the look of an intelligence agency website. The site claims to be the personal website of Doctor Edwin A. Deagle Jr., who “recently passed away in February 2021.” The expose cited in the transcript connects the depopulation forecast to the CIA and Rockefeller Foundation. It states that Declassified FOIA documents from the 1970s show Deagle’s direct communication with Stansfield Turner, then director of the CIA. It also states that in 1976, Doctor Edwin Diegel moved to New York to become deputy director of the International Relations program at the Rockefeller Foundation. The transcript further claims the Rockefeller Foundation was created on 05/14/1913 and links the Rockefeller family’s role in establishing the Federal Reserve to “unlimited funds” and debt burdens on future generations. It says the Rockefeller Foundation funded eugenics programs, outlawed natural medicine and fuel (including hemp), and replaced them with chemical compounds derived from oil company toxic waste. It also claims the Rockefeller Foundation created the United Nations and that it has influence through NGOs in Western countries. The transcript says that in 2019 the Rockefeller Foundation funded “Event 201,” described as the blueprint for COVID lockdowns executed weeks later. It adds that Doctor Edwin A. Diegel Jr. is officially said to have retired in 2005. The transcript states that the 2014 depopulation forecast predicted that by 2025 the UK would decline by 77%, Ireland by 72%, the United States by 68%, and Germany by 65%, while Russia would experience practically zero decline. It claims that “official data” shows the predictions may be accurate, citing government shutdowns and mandated shots as causing “staggering levels of excess death.” It says UK government data indicates COVID-19 vaccines were the main cause of excess death and that more shots increased the likelihood of death, and it claims that over twenty million have died from COVID lockdowns and experimental shots (while noting this number still does not equal what Diegel predicted by 2025, because “we still have time”). A 2014 letter included with the forecast says the predicted decline would occur because collapse of the Western financial system would wipe out the standard of living, causing reverse migration and the demise of the United States. It states that changes in economic paradigms have historically produced death tolls rarely highlighted by mainstream historians, and it argues that the end of the petrodollar and the rise of resource-backed BRICs would bring the Federal Reserve’s “USD Ponzi scheme” to an end, making the forecast a reality without a “smart recovery plan.” The transcript ends by identifying the reporter as Greg Reiss, credited with the Infowars report.

The speaker ties a series of events to a ritual pattern, referencing theProject for the New American Century and arguing that support for its plans overseas would require a new Pearl Harbor, a claim linked to warnings a year before 9/11. They cite the World Economic Forum and Bill Gates’ Event 2010 simulating a pandemic out of China “just six weeks before the footage started appearing of bodies dropping in Wuhan.” They assert that such patterns are intentional signals, and that massive cyber attack drills and Klaus Schwab’s expressed fears of a coming cyber pandemic were steps toward that direction. They note that in December Israel hosted a cyber pandemic drill, and “on Monday just twelve weeks later their government was attacked in what they say was the largest ever cyber attack on the country.” Given Israel’s “infamous hacking capabilities,” the speaker suggests it feels like a controlled vulnerability, a way to create a plausible escape while the detective won’t suspect involvement in the metaphorical murder. The speaker argues that chess pieces are being moved in both Russia and Ukraine to bring about a scenario where “the world we once knew is gone,” destroyed, and a “new world, a world of their design, will emerge.” They claim a future in which “you’ll own nothing, and you’ll be happy, happy in your complete submission.” They invoke a historical allegory, “Like Xerxes to Leonidas,” to describe the perceived power struggle behind these actions.

The transcript discusses a narrative that connects Bill Gates, Jeffrey Epstein, and a global, pre-planned approach to pandemics, presenting a sequence of alleged events and structures designed to profit from health crises. It begins with a claim that new vaccines and health services could be improved and costs reduced by ten to fifteen percent over the next five to ten years, and that a future pandemic will occur regardless of current efforts. It is stated that the pandemic risk is two to three percent per year and that attention to preparedness will continue, noting that the pandemic was predictable and could be far more severe in the future. One speaker asserts they had predicted the risk of a pandemic and that it came true. The brand-new Epstein files are then introduced, claiming they show Epstein planned the whole thing from the start and expose a financial system designed around pandemics that operated long before COVID-19. The documents allegedly reveal a hidden network directly connecting Bill Gates, Jeffrey Epstein, and other powerful individuals. Epstein is said to have helped design the financial apparatus that later secured over 100 million dollars in funding for the Gates Foundation, advising JPMorgan executives on pitching a Gates Anchored Donor Fund to attract vaccine investments under the guise of philanthropy but designed to generate profits. It is claimed Gates had already invested in vaccines from the early 2000s but faced controversy over mass vaccine distribution and promises of disease eradication, which allegedly sometimes worsened problems. Gates is also quoted as saying vaccines could reduce the global population by a significant amount. There is a point-by-point timeline: the world’s population is described as 6.8 billion, headed toward about 9 billion, with a suggestion that great work on vaccines and reproductive health could lower that by ten to fifteen percent. In 2013, the Gates Foundation allegedly created the Global Health Investment Fund, allowing private investors to fund drug and vaccine development with a stated health purpose, while offering a 60% guarantee of principal, meaning investors would risk only 40% while the remaining 60% of potential losses would be covered by philanthropic and public money. This structure is said to convert global health issues into profitable opportunities with low risk, securing funds and enabling subsequent actions. Epstein’s role is described as expanding Gates’ influence in pandemic preparedness. The 2011 funding groundwork allegedly paved the way for broader governance, with Gates Foundation discussions in 2015 about pandemics and global responses, involving groups like the International Peace Institute, World Health Organization, World Bank, MSF, and UN officials. It is claimed Epstein acted as a back-channel intermediary to spread Gates’ influence, maintaining contacts even after funding refusals, by forwarding Gates’ articles on pandemic preparedness. The timeline continues with 2017 being a turning point, where pandemics were discussed as business opportunities rather than disasters, and Epstein was said to broker specialists into Gates’ office for pandemic simulations. A doctor’s text is cited indicating pandemic simulation as a key credential, with Epstein recommending a connection to Gates. That year also saw the World Bank launch the first emergency financing facility, raising $320 million in bonds named to cover coronavirus risks, implying planning for a coronavirus-style outbreak years in advance. In October 2019, six weeks before COVID-19, Event 201—a pandemic simulation modeled on a novel coronavirus—was co-hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, the World Economic Forum, and the Gates Foundation, focusing on government policy during a viral outbreak, distribution of drugs, media messaging, social media management, public compliance, and unified global response. Six weeks later, the real outbreak began. While the documents are not proof, and other evidence such as patents and gain-of-function funding are cited, the narrative suggests a pattern of pre-planned preparation, money, simulations, networks, vaccines, and elite alignment. The closing question asks readers to consider who benefits when such world-stage events occur, proposing that identifying beneficiaries clarifies the situation.

The speaker discusses how the pandemic was used to assert control, profit the pharmaceutical industry, and introduce surveillance measures. They highlight the involvement of intelligence agencies and the military in the pandemic response, with the NSA and Pentagon leading Operation Warp Speed. The speaker also mentions that the vaccines were developed by NIH and manufactured by military contractors, not by Moderna and Pfizer as claimed. They discuss the numerous pandemic simulations sponsored by the CIA over the years and the involvement of April Haines, the former deputy director of the CIA. The speaker questions the origins of the virus and the role of the CIA and Chinese CDC in suppressing the lab leak theory. They also provide a historical context of the US bioweapons program and its connection to the CIA and Pentagon.

The speaker claims a CIA whistleblower will testify before a Senate committee that the intelligence community has covered up the origin of COVID for years. The speaker asserts evidence shows the U.S. government funded research in Wuhan and that the virus likely escaped from a lab, adding that CIA scientists concluded it came from a lab leak and that someone later “scribbled out” their conclusion at 2AM and changed the report. The speaker frames CIA involvement as part of a larger effort involving military-related covert operations, stating the CIA has two reasons to live: covert support for the State Department or for the military. The speaker argues that over time, long-term CIA covert actions become USAID programs for logistical reasons, especially when scaling beyond a small “need to know” group and security-clearance constrained operations. The speaker says covert action requires secrecy, skiffs, close-hold communications, and a small number of people, so a public-facing program is needed to broaden participation. In that model, the speaker says USAID or state department programs can engage the private sector, nonprofits, universities, researchers, activists, and media, with public messaging and political support to help scale the underlying aims while keeping the core plan secret. The speaker links this asserted COVID narrative to historical biological warfare and “gain of function” research, citing declassified documents from the 1950s and Operation Northwoods-era plans involving Cuba. The speaker claims Cold War U.S. military and CIA planning included “gain of function” research and the dropping of disease-infected ticks and insects over Cuban agricultural areas to induce crop failures and economically destabilize Cuba without a conventional military invasion. The speaker further claims the plans involved making biological agents appear to be of natural origin and avoiding traceable external attribution, describing discussion of using “nonlethal insect borne biological warfare agents” and coordinating planning information with specific people and labs. The speaker states that, according to their account, biological warfare planning involved references to Fort Detrick and the Rocky Mountain lab in Montana, which they say also played a key role in both COVID-19 and Lyme disease. They claim the same lab used for Lyme was connected to plans for accidental releases intended to look natural. From there, the speaker argues that COVID-origin research ties into personnel and timelines. They claim that in 2015 the CIA and ODNI reached out to Ralph Baric to discuss coronavirus evolution and adapting coronaviruses to humans, and that shortly afterward Baric collaborated with Zheng Li Shi (“the bat lady”) on research funded through USAID’s PREDICT program. The speaker also claims that in 2018 Baric and Zheng Li Shi were listed as collaborators on a DARPA proposal involving a furin cleavage site, and that in January 2020 Baric was summoned by ODNI biological sciences experts to brief officials on coronavirus origins, discussing a possible accidental lab release at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The speaker asserts Avril Haines, then deputy head of the CIA, later became head of ODNI and played a key role in the Event 201 simulator. The speaker concludes by tying these threads back to the alleged CIA-to-USAID scaling mechanism and to CIA contractors and censorship efforts, claiming that the CIA’s role explains why CIA-walked scientists concluded a lab leak and why the conclusion was allegedly altered. They also discuss NIE/DOD/USAID/NED linkages, asserting that NED is suited for the role of supporting covert objectives with indirect public-facing infrastructure.