TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Eva Braun and Adolf Hitler had met when she was just 17 and she worked as an assistant to the photographer Heinrich Hoffmann, who went on to become Hitler's personal cameraman. Hitler and Braun became lovers in 1932. Now, thirteen years later, as the remaining German forces were overwhelmed, Eva wrote in a letter to her friend, Hertha Schneider, we are fighting here until the last, but I'm afraid the end is threatening closer and closer. On April 29, Hitler decided to marry his longtime mistress Eva Braun. The ceremony was concluded with Goebbels and Bormann as witnesses. Hitler signed the wedding certificate but when it was Eva's turn, she began to write her surname as Braun before crossing out the letter B and instead writing Eva Hitler. Arm in arm, Hitler led his bride to the study for the wedding reception. Hitler now admitted for the first time that all was lost. Hitler said, everything is lost. Pack your things and go. You to have leave and within an hour, the last plane would bring you out. After that moment of silence, Eva Braun stepped forward, went to him and took his hand and said, but you know I will stay with you. Less than two days after the wedding on April 30, Hitler and his bride ended their lives together. They had been married just a few hours. Eva took a cyanide capsule, popped it into her mouth, she died instantly. Hitler picked up his gun, put it to his right temple and fired. Hitler's dog Blondie was also poisoned. Members of the staff carried the bodies in blankets and soaked them with what petrol they could find and set them alight. Hitler did not want to be handed over to the barbaric Bolsheviks because he knew what they had done to Mussolini. Thus, taking his life and setting his body on fire was his own wish. One day before committing suicide, Hitler dictated his political testament, a suicide note, in which he denied any responsibility for starting the war. Right up until the very end, when Hitler had nothing to gain, he wanted the world to know that he had never wanted war.

Wir sind eine stark verschworene Gemeinschaft und wollen in Ruhe gelassen werden. Unser Vorteil ist unsere Friedensliebe, niemandem Leid zuzufügen. 1939 haben die Westmächte die Maske fallen lassen und Deutschland den Krieg erklärt. Trotz Versuchen und Entgegenkommen geben sie zu, dass Polen wahrscheinlich eingewilligt hätte, aber sie wollten den Krieg. Innere Gegner bestätigten dies. England wird den Kampf bekommen. Nachdem Bomben auf die Bevölkerung in Westfalen geworfen wurden, wartete ich 14 Tage, weil ich dachte, der Mann ist wahnsinnig. Er führt einen Kampf, bei dem nur ein Volk gewinnen wird. **Translation:** We are a strongly united community and want to be left alone. Our advantage is our love of peace, not to cause suffering to anyone. In 1939, the Western powers dropped the mask and declared war on Germany. Despite attempts and concessions, they admit that Poland would probably have agreed, but they wanted the war. Internal opponents confirmed this. England will get the fight. After bombs were dropped on the population in Westphalia, I waited 14 days because I thought the man was crazy. He is waging a battle in which only one nation will win.

During World War II, the Soviet Union was a military ally whose anti-Nazi propaganda was accepted and later integrated into historical accounts. One speaker states their belief that 6,000,000 Jews were killed in the war by Adolf Hitler and the Nazis. They then ask another speaker, the president of Iran and a scholar, if he believes that 6,000,000 Jews were killed by the Nazis, or if he thinks that is not true. The other speaker says he doesn't think 6,000,000 Jews were gassed, and cautions that this statement is against the law in Germany, and could result in imprisonment.

We're not here to kill Russians, but to defeat them. If persuasion fails, we will eliminate as many as necessary, even millions if needed. Those who resist will face consequences. We need to eradicate local dissent. They indoctrinate our soldiers to hate Ukrainians. They claim that Ukrainians would live like the French if it weren't for the Muscovites. We need massacres. We must drown these children where the duck swims. This is our honey, not yours. If someone says the Muscovites have occupied them, throw them in the river. Drive these people into the old wooden house.

If you hadn't given us our military equipment, this war would have been over in two weeks, maybe even less. Actually, I heard from Putin that it would have been over in three days.

Our policy is to wage war by sea and air with all our might, aiming for victory at all costs. Germany suffered nearly 5 million military deaths and half a million civilian deaths in allied bombing raids during World War II.

At the start of the war, we weren't in a good position and didn't have the upper hand. Now, things are different; we're gaining leverage. But you're playing a dangerous game, gambling with the lives of millions and risking World War Three. Your actions are disrespectful to this country. I've given more than many suggested, and yet, there hasn't been a single thank you, not even once.

We will now talk about the future of Ukraine with you, as it seems you are serious about it. Putin had asked the Americans in December 2021 for written confirmation on how to handle Ukraine, but President Biden refused to negotiate on this matter. There should have been an uproar on the German side, as a potential war would involve Germany in the issue.

We can't take a chance after having done this incredible thing last night of letting somebody else take over where we have to do it again. We can do it again too. Nobody can stop us. There's nobody that has the capability that we have. When I watch that war in Russia going on and on and on and everybody dying, it's primitive. It's primitive. It's horrible. Could you tell could you tell us, mister president?

Hitler had two poison gases, Tabun and Sarin, nerve gases against which none of the Allies had defenses, yet he ordered that these gases not be used because Germany had signed the deal with invention. The speaker urges historians to investigate contradictions, offering "a thousand pints, anyone who can find one line of evidence." Hitler's euthanasia order is in the files with his signature, issued in 1940 but backdated to the first day of the war. The order to kill Russian commissars after the campaign began is documented in the military files; "Hitler ordered their war to be liquidated." The order to kill British commandos, "that Hitler order of October 1942 is in the files," is described as criminal. He could have wiped out the Normandy Beachhead with the gases and won the war; "on no account was poison gas be used because it was convicted of the G Convention."

After World War II, there were massive stockpiles of chemical weapons, particularly mustard gas. These weapons were extremely dangerous and corrosive, causing death by liquefying the lungs. During the war, both the Germans and the French used mustard gas, often resulting in self-inflicted harm when the wind changed direction. After the war, the issue of what to do with these stockpiles arose. Some were dumped in the ocean, while others were destroyed. The dumping of chemical weapons has caused pollution in places like the Adriatic Sea and the English Channel. In the 1960s and 1970s, the denial of this issue was prevalent, but now it is widely known.

Speaker 0: In the best documented cases, the Auschwitz Camp, vast documentation shows how these order of save everyone's life is being implemented with huge efforts of improving sanitary hygienic conditions, building massive hospital complex complexes that treat inmates, and then you see the records of how they were treated, how all these people, these inmates unable to work. Mhmm. That's the cliche. If you're unfit for work and more than two weeks you get killed. You see the records of all these inmates, tens of thousands of them, being unable to work, being kept in hospitals, being fed, being cured, and until they are fit again and they get released. It's lot of work. Massive amount of investment in most modern medicine of the time with x-ray investigations and surgeries and lab tests all over the place. Tens of hundreds of thousands of document proving that. And you look even in the financial side in today's dollars, almost a quarter billion dollars of money invested in order to get a medical facility going that is On Auschwitz? In Auschwitz. In order for for the entire region, for every inmate that in the the greater part of of Poland and what is East Germany, all inmates who get sick and can't be treated in in the other camps get sent to Auschwitz into this massive hospital camp facility to get proper treatment. Mhmm. You look at the the technology they use. We don't know about Zyklon b saying it's being used to save Yeah. Their They're using Zyklon b to do To kill lives. So Zyklon B is sent there to save lives, but what I'm getting at is to what 1944, Zyklon B kind of phases out because we have new technologies. DDT from today's perspective, unfortunately, but it worked better, and microwave delousing facilities.

Speaker 0 argues that parasites have become a problem because they have been weaponized. They reference a Nobel Prize-winning finding showing that a certain parasite could produce stomach cancer in rats, and that a different parasite produced this effect in Japan. They note these results only worked in animals that ate a high-sugar diet or were vaccinated, not in healthy animals. They then connect this to twentieth-century American policy: vaccination began with troops during World War I and continued in the military, then expanded to schoolchildren after World War II. The speaker predicts that vaccines at school would eventually affect broader segments of the population, not just children, and claims that vaccines have the effect of making people more susceptible to parasites, including those that cause cancer, not just toxoplasmosis. Regarding diet, the speaker mentions the food pyramid of the twentieth century, pointing out that the bottom consisted of carbohydrates, implying a link to susceptibility. The speaker then discusses bioweapons policy: in 1971, Nixon declared an end to the United States bioweapons offensive program and signed a treaty (they mention a 1978 figure, implying a multinational agreement). They claim that, despite this treaty, the Soviet Union and others violated it, and that perhaps everyone violated it. They assert that, at the same time the treaty was signed, Fort Detrick was converted from a bioweapons lab to be part of the National Cancer Institute. They compare this to Nazi Germany, stating that they hid bioweapons under cancer research, and claim that the United States did something similar. The transcription ends with emphatic agreement.

Speaker 0 urges historical perspective, noting the wartime Soviet alliance and that their anti-Nazi propaganda was accepted by the Allies; as victors, the Soviets "got to commit their propaganda to the history books as fact." He says current knowledge of Stalin's despotism and the KGB's deception, and the camps Majdanek, Belzec, Kelno, Treblinka, and Sobibor, have required relying on Soviet sources. "I believe in the inarguable fact that 6,000,000 Jews were killed in the war by Adolf Hitler and Nazis." He asks Speaker 2 if he believes that figure. Speaker 2 replies, "But I don't think 6,000,000 Jews were gassed. Now be careful. I I beg of you. This is against the law in Germany. If there was a German somebody that's in German state, you could have me thrown into prison before I leave Germany."

Speaker 0 describes a stance to attack only on the front lines, not against women or children, noting that “that was a data loss,” and that they “did it to all fronts” and “we did not fly a night attack.” He argues that since bombs would be dropped anyway, before the German people he cannot permit his own Volksgenossen to perish while sparing foreigners, so the war must be fought and the sacrifices available must be used. Speaker 1, after acknowledging that he cannot deny this any longer, refers to himself as “the greatest strategist born so far” and declares that the Luftkrieg (air war) is his doing. He calls it a brilliant idea by Mister Georgill against the civilian population, noting England apparently rejected this in anticipation of future developments. He asserts that in this war he did not conduct night attacks on civilian populations in Poland, arguing that at night the objective cannot be hit as accurately, so he primarily targeted roofs and aimed at military targets. He says he did the same in Norway, Holland, and France. He contrasts this with a belief that the British Air Force would be unable to escape German scrutiny if night raids targeted civilians, implying that the German campaign aimed at military targets. As the war in the West ended, he extended his efforts toward “Henglad,” and faced pressure from many to act sooner: “how long, Führer, do you wait? They do not stop.” He waited over three months and then gave the order to commence the fight with the same resolve with which he had started every battle, continuing “up to now.” Speaker 2 portrays the enemy as incredibly cruel and determined to destroy Germany, stating that the enemy has proclaimed this thousands of times, and asserting that there is no reason to doubt it. He intensifies the claim by equating the enemies’ motives with biblical purge concepts, describing a wish for Germany’s extermination with “Mann und Maus und Jung und Alt.” He emphasizes that what would be done to German women and children cannot be imagined, urging that it will be a total war that affects every German, their lives, existence, family, wife, and child—the war threatens life itself. He concludes that wherever now flourishing cities and villages exist, a future of desolation would result, turning into a desert; the war, he says, is total and affects everyone.

Said to Kennedy, you watch when Adolf Hitler begins bombing London and towns in Britain like Boston and Lincoln, towns with their counterparts in The United States. You Americans will have to come in, won't you? You can't just stand aside and watch us suffering. But he knew from code breaking. He knew from reading the German Air Force signals, which we had broken on March or 05/26/1940, that Hitler had given orders that no British town was to be bombed. London was completely embargoed. German air force was allowed to bomb ports and harbors and dockyards, but not towns as such. And Churchill was greatly aggrieved by this, and he wondered how much longer Hitler could avoid carrying on war like this. But Hitler, as we know, carried on until September 1940 without bombing any English towns. The embargo stayed in force. You can see it in the German archives now, and we know from the code breaking of the German signals that Churchill was reading Hitler's orders to the German Air Force, not on any account to bomb these towns. So there was no way that we could drag in the Americans that way unless we could provoke Hitler to do it, which is why on 08/25/1940, Churchill gave the order to the British Air Force to go and bomb Berlin. Although the chief of the bomber command and chief of staff of the British Air Force warned him that if we bomb Berlin, Hitler may very well lift the embargo on British towns. And Churchill just twinkled because it was what he wanted, of course. At 09:15 that morning, he telephoned personal bomber command himself to order the bombing of Berlin, a 100 bombers to go and bomb Berlin. They went out to bomb Berlin that night, and Hitler still didn't move. Hitler ordered another aid on Berlin, and so it went on for the next seven or ten days until finally on September 4, Hitler lost his patience and made that famous speech in the Sport Palace in Berlin in which he said, this madman has bombed Berlin now seven times. He bombs Berlin once more than I shall not only just attack their towns, I shall wipe them out. A very famous speech. Of course, German school children are now told about the Hitler speech. They're not told about what went first. They're not told how Churchill sent out deliberately to provoke the bombing of his own capital. And on the following day, Churchill ordered Berlin bombed again. And the result was the German air force started bombing the docks in London, the East End Of London, finally, city Of London and the West End on the September 1940. In September 1940, 7,000 Londoners were killed in the bombing as a result of Churchill's deliberate provocation. The files are there. The archives are there. No wonder Harold Macmillan didn't want my book published.

Speaker 0 argues that it’s logistically absurd to claim the Holocaust involved gassing millions and hauling bodies from so-called gas chambers, noting the inefficiency of that method. He points out the irony that the person most famous for gassing people refused to use gas that could have won the war, because he would not be the first to use gas, despite having 20,000 kilograms of tabun and sarin. He asserts there were no counters to that chemical weapon, yet the decision not to use gas led to the downfall of his country. Speaker 1 adds that Hitler was gassed himself at the end of World War I, which blinded him. During the fall of the Kaiser’s empire, the Reich’s collapse and the emergence of Bolshevik and Weimar structures occurred as some German states did not join the Weimar Republic and became sub-states or Soviet-like entities. Speaker 0 emphasizes that anyone uncertain about Hitler’s legacy should read Mein Kampf and hear from Hitler’s own words to understand why he held his beliefs. He claims Hitler did not begin as an anti-Semite intent on killing Jews, and describes Hitler as someone who admired and observed the universe, was a truth-seeker from day one, engaged in political discussions, and was fascinated by philosophy, German history, the British Empire, and America. He notes Hitler was well-read and well-spoken, but deprived economically, working as a day laborer with little work available to feed himself. He claims Hitler went days without food to afford a book, showing a love of knowledge, and that he wasn’t a failed artist; he was a talented artist whose path could have been architecture rather than drawing. Speaker 0 contends that smear campaigns against Hitler fail and are “nonsense.” He dismisses more extreme claims as false, such as insults about Hitler’s sexuality or anatomy, and mentions that such accusations are common against many figures. Speaker 1 comments that a lot of the negative rumors about Hitler (e.g., perverse claims) are typical allegations made against many people, implying they are not unique to Hitler.

"In 1943, the communists will use the word Nazis, fascist, and antisemitic in order to push the public mind to make them believe something by using repetition." "Germany was arresting all the bankers because they were charging so much interest that they were destroying the country." "60,000,000 Germans died." "after World War two, all these generals in America actually realized they fought the wrong enemy. The enemy is within." "Even general Patton said we should have fought with the fascist against the communist, otherwise, our country will degrade." "There's also another part that was left out of the story." "Yes."

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss Nazi chemical capabilities and the use of Zyklon B. Speaker 0 states that Nazis had developed sarin gas and tabun, "nasty deadly nerve gases," and argues that the idea they would actually use Zyklon B, which was essential for maintaining health in the camps, is ridiculous. Speaker 1 agrees, saying it seems ridiculous and that “the whole story” appears ridiculous once examined. Speaker 1 adds that years ago they investigated because it was illegal, noting changes over time, and that they felt compelled to keep quiet. Speaker 0 then shifts to logistics, noting that there are documents on trains that came in, the amounts of coke used in the crematoria, and that everything is well documented, including the number of people who actually made it to Auschwitz. He mentions Red Cross–related deaths as part of the documentation but the sentence trails off: “The deaths by the Red Cross I think were put.”

"the story we got about World War II is all wrong. I think that's right." "FDR's right hand man was a Soviet spy. Certainly was. Right? Confirmed." "One can make the argument we should have sided with Hitler and fought Stalin. Patton said that, so and maybe there wouldn't have been a holocaust, right?" "Stalin was awful by any metric and we weren't his ally." "The story is that there were a few missing American soldiers at the end of World War II in Russian territory. 15 to 20,000 were missing and we left them there." "we knew to the morning that Pearl Harbor was Stalin going to get knew it going to be attacked."

The speaker discusses a turning point in how the international community views morality in warfare. They describe this as a really important moment in history, highlighting that debates about what is permissible in war were taking place on a global scale. The narrative anchors this moment in the experiences of World War I, pointing to the horrors that occurred during that conflict as a catalyst for reflection on ethical boundaries in warfare. A central example used to illustrate the shift is the devastation caused by poisonous gas in World War I. The speaker emphasizes how the use of chemical agents revealed the severe human cost of such weapons and underscored the need to reexamine what should be allowed during armed conflict. This exposure to the brutal consequences of certain weapons helped drive an international rethinking of permissible conduct in war. As a concrete outcome of this rethinking, the Geneva Protocol is highlighted as a landmark agreement signed in 1925. The protocol prohibited chemical and bacteriological (biological) weapons, marking a formal restriction on what could be employed in warfare. The speaker frames this as a key moment in history because it represented a collective commitment to limiting the means of war in order to protect human rights, even while hostilities were ongoing. The underlying message conveyed is that there are defined lines in war—certain weapons or methods that should not be crossed regardless of military objectives. The Geneva Protocol is presented as an institutional embodiment of that principle, signaling that even in the midst of conflict, there is recognition of fundamental human rights and a willingness to place restrictions on how warfare is conducted. In summary, the speaker highlights a historical arc from the wartime horrors of World War I to a postwar commitment to moral constraints in warfare. The devastating impact of chemical weapons prompted international action, culminating in the 1925 Geneva Protocol, which prohibited chemical and bacteriological weapons and asserted that human rights should be protected even during armed conflict. The emphasis remains on the idea that certain practices in war are unacceptable and that there are explicit lines that nations agree not to cross.

Hitler embargoed the use of poison gas, as evidenced by a document signed by him, references in the German high command vows, verbatim references by him, and shorthand records of meetings. If Churchill had used poison gas on German cities, the Germans would have won the war because they possessed nerve gases like sarin and tabun. In 1944, Germany had stockpiles of 30,000 tons of these nerve gases. Had Hitler used them in Normandy, it would have ended the Allied bridgehead because Allied gas masks were ineffective against German nerve gases. Hitler, despite being able to gain a strategic advantage by using nerve gas, did not because he signed the Geneva Gas Protocol, which forbade him from using gas first.

I attacked an unarmed village with rocket bombs and murdered 4,000,000 peaceful citizens of Oceania. This is cold blooded murder, not war. Until now, the war has been conducted with honor, bravery, truth, and justice. The endless catalog of bestial atrocities must be terminated. Forces of darkness and the treasonable minds who collaborate with them must be wiped from the face of the earth. We must crush them. We must smash them.

"There is considerable evidence to that effect that it was a a World War two propaganda device." "Once Germany lost the war, the lie or the propaganda lie or the atrocity propaganda persisted, and nobody was there to challenge it with facts." "I happened to have the onerous duty of going into Buchenwald right after the surrender of Germany. I saw the camp. I saw some of the survivors. I saw the ovens." "Under what is under dispute is whether there was a policy of planned genocide by by a government body." "I am not permitted to talk to you about the Holocaust per se under judge's orders." "Justice Jackson had, for instance, one reference to torture by one of the most famous of the Nuremberg accused expunged from the record."

The speaker discusses Adolf Hitler and poison gases, noting that Hitler possessed two nerve gases, Tabun and Sarin, against which none of the Allies had any defense. Despite this, Hitler ordered that these poison gases not be used because Germany had signed the Geneva Convention. The speaker asserts there are contradictions here that historians should have investigated, claiming to have spent thirty years in archives and even offering rewards for any evidence, yet suggesting that if such evidence exists, others would have found it. The argument pivots to the expectation of traceable chain-of-command documentation. The speaker points out the many people involved in the process—from the individual writing the teletype message on one end to the recipient at the other end, with twenty copies at each end—and argues that even if official files were destroyed, someone would have written home or kept a diary. The speaker asserts that such evidence should be in the records because Hitler’s other crimes are documented in various forms. Specific documented crimes and orders attributed to Hitler are listed: - Euthanasia: an actual order with Hitler’s signature, issued sometime in 1940 but backdated to the first day of the war, with Hitler’s euthanasia order in the files with the Signicharlotter. - The order to kill the Russian commissars after the campaign in Russia began, with those commissars described as political officers attached to the Russian armed forces; the order is documented in the military files of the day. - The order to kill British commandos, noted as a particularly sore point for Canadians, with Hitler’s order from October 1942 in the files, described as a criminal order and adequately documented. - The order to kill the male population of Stalingrad after capturing the city, recorded in the private diary of General Helder (Haldbr). - The order to Linzalla Airmen in May 1944, also attributed to Hitler, and documented. The speaker then raises an interesting question about Hitler’s character: how could he unhesitatingly issue orders that are crimes under international law, such as the order to kill prisoners, while at the same time ordering that poison gas not be used to avoid violating the Geneva Convention? The speaker notes that poison gas could have potentially changed the course of the war—specifically, around the Normandy Beachhead in July 1944, when it was established and near breakout—arguing that use of nerve gases against which Allied troops had no gas masks could have wiped out the entire Normandy Beachhead. The speaker contends that Hitler could have won the war by pulling out the Panzer divisions and redeploying them to the Eastern Front, potentially mopping up the Eastern Front in two to three months, but He did not.