reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 1 administered COVID-19 vaccinations but is unsure of the number. Speaker 0 suggests COVID is a hoax for depopulation, causing deaths and disabilities worldwide. Speaker 1 took responsibility to protect their company. Speaker 0 finds the revelations interesting.

We must address anti-vax campaigns to save lives. I am willing to collaborate with the government on emergency legislation to combat misinformation. The discussion of censorship on morning TV in the UK is concerning, as it threatens freedom of speech and individual rights. It is important to be skeptical about products and protect our collective duty to question.

The speaker claims that Jews were behind the creation of the COVID vaccines. Specifically, they state that Tal Zaks, an Israeli scientist, was the chief medical officer in charge of research and development for the Moderna vaccine. They add that Albert Bourla, a Greek Jew, is the CEO of Pfizer, and Mikhail Dolsten, a Jew from Sweden, is the chief scientist. The speaker concludes that both COVID vaccines were created by Jews. Another speaker states they are 59 years old, in good health, and not working on the front lines, therefore vaccination is not recommended for them.

People are finally starting to see the evidence against vaccines, with new studies linking boosters to cancer. Most MPs are still supporting vaccines, but only to save face until after the upcoming election. The speaker believes the vaccine rollout is a crime against humanity, with potentially millions of deaths worldwide.

The speaker suggests distinguishing between the vaccinated and unvaccinated. Another person questions this, arguing that it infringes on human rights and that new variants have little impact. They present data from the UK to support their point. The first speaker emphasizes the importance of maximizing freedom for vaccinated individuals, especially for travel, as an incentive to get vaccinated. The second person accuses the first speaker of having ulterior motives, mentioning their connections to the pharmaceutical industry and past controversies. They strongly oppose the first speaker's involvement in public health and the protection of rights. The first speaker concludes by stating that vaccination is the path to freedom.

Deborah Brooks questioned the effectiveness of COVID-19 shots, stating that she always knew they wouldn't provide protection against infection. With millions of injections administered worldwide, the speaker wonders if this is a crime. Another speaker believes it is a crime and a cover-up, as they mentioned in their book in December 2022. They argue that the situation has worsened since then and that people are dying. The speaker expresses frustration with vaccine mandates at universities and workplaces, as well as the UK's requirement for school children to get vaccinated. They conclude that this is a joke, a crime, a cover-up, and even murder.

The speaker emphasizes the need for a pandemic treaty and global preparedness. They express optimism despite setbacks and stress the importance of learning from failures. Another speaker discusses concerns about big pharma's influence and the development of new vaccines. They highlight issues with peer-reviewed studies and the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. Additionally, they promote natural health products available at doctorjonesnaturals.com.

We must address anti-vax campaigns to save lives. I am willing to collaborate with the government on emergency legislation to combat misinformation. The discussion of censorship on morning television in the UK is concerning, as it threatens freedom of speech and individual rights to be skeptical about certain products.

The speaker discusses the safety concerns of COVID-19 vaccines and emphasizes the importance of getting vaccinated. They mention the risk of blood clots with the J&J vaccine but assure that all vaccines are good and safe. The speaker urges parents to vaccinate their children, even though COVID poses minimal threat to healthy kids. They recommend adolescents to get two doses of the vaccine and mention the possibility of needing a booster shot. The speaker suggests that innovative solutions may be required, including a fourth immunization. They highlight the importance of getting vaccinated to protect against hospitalizations and rising COVID cases. The speaker also addresses misinformation and emphasizes the need for everyone to be vaccinated, including children. They mention the possibility of needing additional boosters in the future. The transcript ends with praise for the speaker's expertise and a brief mention of monkeypox being transmitted among a specific social network.

In 1909, Dr. Clark claimed vaccinations cause cancer, stating he'd never seen cancer in an unvaccinated person. Saint Savior's Cancer Hospital made a similar claim in 1887. In 1885, the speaker alleges that vaccinations were driven by profit, including profits from side effects. Going back to 1799, the speaker claims that after Dr. Jenner introduced the smallpox vaccine, deaths increased, enraging people and medical professionals who wanted him put on trial. The speaker connects the origin of Raggedy Ann dolls to a father whose daughter died after being vaccinated without his consent. The speaker suggests people should consider this history when told that vaccines will fix cancer.

Doctors' fallibility and the lack of consideration for natural immunity are discussed. The conversation touches on mandatory vaccination, anecdotal evidence, and the risks and benefits of vaccines. The speakers debate the number of children who died from COVID and the importance of vaccines. They also mention the potential harm caused by vaccines and the need for individual choice. The conversation ends with a mention of the COVID vaccine's testing and the speaker's personal experience with it.

A lady in Canada recently held a press conference urging people to get vaccinated and wear masks. The speakers discuss their observations on the vaccine situation, including the loss of jobs for those who choose not to get vaccinated. They mention that the vaccine doesn't prevent transmission or guarantee protection from the virus. They also criticize the use of masks, stating that cloth and surgical masks are ineffective. The speakers express their disbelief and question the lack of scientific evidence supporting these measures. They speculate about the motives behind these decisions.

Some people love the vaccines, while others hate them. The speaker acknowledges that vaccines have saved lives, but also mentions concerns about their safety. Reports vary on the effectiveness and problems with the vaccines, but the speaker claims to have saved 100 million lives. They argue that those who get very sick and go to the hospital are usually the ones who haven't taken the vaccine. The mainstream media is accused of stifling information about adverse reactions. The speaker believes the vaccines have saved millions of lives but criticizes the media for pausing the Johnson and Johnson vaccine over a small number of cases.

The speaker claims colored vaccines are dangerous, with no clinical benefit and over 10,000,000 deaths worldwide. They suggest avoiding vaccination altogether, citing studies showing unvaccinated kids are healthier. They criticize censorship by the government and medical boards, leading to job loss and license revocation for speaking out against the narrative. The medical journals are also deemed corrupt. Speaker 1 mentions not every batch causes harm, as they themselves took a few shots without issue.

The speaker suggests that the recent passing of the queen is not a coincidence. They claim that during a jubilee ceremony, the queen and other world leaders revealed their involvement in altering the genetic code of humanity through vaccinations. The speaker believes that these leaders are descendants of fallen angels and are intentionally keeping this information hidden. They argue that those who have taken the vaccine will experience fear and regret as their genetic code, including the name of God, has been changed. The speaker advises seeking the truth, relying on God, and not trusting pharmaceuticals.

In 2021, the speaker believed the pandemic was exaggerated to frighten people and was concerned about the injections due to their pharma research background. Their thinking has since advanced, but they maintain the injections cannot help anyone. They claim the "vaccines" contain unnecessary features, leading to the conclusion that they were intentionally designed to injure, kill, and reduce fertility, though not quickly or in large numbers initially. The speaker connects the injections to a broader plan involving electronic money, the removal of cash, and digital IDs. They cite an EU commission scheme called EU Vabeco, started in 2018, which anticipates a future where EU citizens' digital IDs are governed by their mRNA-based "vaccine" status, requiring regular injections. The speaker believes the claim that these injections improve health and safety is a lie, and recommends against all vaccines. They assert governments do not care about people's health and safety, and that the real reason for the injections is to make people ill and kill them.

Laura Logan hosts a discussion with Dr. Sherri Tenpenny on vaccines, public health policy, and what they see as failures and harms within the system. The conversation weaves together personal history, policy details, scientific debates, and broader social concerns, intercut with promotional content for GiveSendGo. Key points and claims raised by Dr. Tenpenny - Vaccine ingredients and aluminum exposure: Tenpenny asserts that if someone receives every vaccine on the schedule, they would be injected with a total of about twelve thousand micrograms of aluminum, which she says is inflammatory to every organ system and can be stored in bones (60% of aluminum exposure). She notes aluminum is present in vaccines in order to replace mercury, which she describes as also a poison. - Early vaccine industry liability and the 1986 Act: The discussion explains that prior to 1986 there were liability concerns for vaccine makers due to injury lawsuits. Tenpenny recounts that in 1986 Congress passed a law giving the pharmaceutical industry liability immunity for vaccines, creating what she describes as a ramp in the vaccine schedule. She cites that by 1991 additional vaccines were introduced (Hep B at birth, Hib, chickenpox, Prevnar, Gardasil, Hep A, and more) and alleges this resulted in a rising autism incidence aligned with new vaccines. - The vaccine injury system: Tenpenny explains the Injury Compensation Act and the existence of VAERS as a tracking system, along with a separate pathway created under the PREP Act (the Preparedness and Readiness Act). She states that during the COVID era a separate program, the Covered Countermeasure Program (CICP), existed under the PREP Act, but it had no funding and a one-year statute of limitations, leading to under-compensation and very few adjudicated cases; she contrasts this with the earlier 1986 act, which funded vaccine injury compensation through the Federal Court of Claims and VAERS. - Perceived safety and effectiveness concerns: The speakers discuss studies suggesting that the flu shot might not prevent flu and that some studies indicate vaccines including pneumonia vaccines may be associated with higher risk of the conditions they aim to prevent. Tenpenny frames this as evidence of cracks in the vaccine program and argues that vaccines are linked to a broad spectrum of health issues, including autoimmune diseases, infertility, and cancers, which she says have been increasing. - Pediatric vaccination schedule and “pediatric poisoning program”: Tenpenny asserts that infants receive multiple injections early in life, with claims that by age two they will have thousands of micrograms of aluminum and other compounds that remain in the body, including in the brain. She characterizes the pediatric schedule as a systematic poisoning program for children and a parallel “adult assault program” for adults receiving vaccines. - COVID-19 vaccine controversy and health impacts: The conversation covers the COVID vaccines, including assertions about adverse effects such as myocarditis, strokes, kidney injury, autoimmune diseases, neurological issues, and cancers. Tenpenny describes long-term concerns (long COVID, autoimmune diseases) and claims of widespread injury and death, contending that the pandemic revealed how the health-care and pharmaceutical systems operate, including alleged corruption and profit motives. She discusses the difficult experiences of families during the pandemic, including restrictions on care and the use of alternate treatments like ivermectin in some cases. - The claim that COVID vaccines were not properly evaluated and that mandated vaccination reflected coercion: The speakers discuss mandates and the experiences of individuals in workplaces and educational institutions who faced pressure to receive vaccines, including religious exemptions and disputes about mandates. Tenpenny suggests a broader pattern of overreach in public health policy and questions about the balance between individual rights and mandates. - History and philosophy of public health programs: They discuss the Healthy People initiatives, arguing that the program’s goals have expanded in scope (from 15 goals to 1,200 for Healthy People 2030) and that the expansion is associated with greater surveillance and control over personal lives. Tenpenny claims that this is part of a broader trend toward data collection and governance of individual health and behavior. - The economics and incentives around vaccines: The conversation notes how physicians are compensated in part through vaccine administration, implying financial incentives influence clinical decisions. Tenpenny emphasizes the profit motive behind vaccines and the pharmaceutical industry’s financial interests, citing extreme examples like the one boy in a photo who allegedly became heavily medicated due to vaccines. - The role of media and information control: They discuss the influence of advertising in media since the 1990s and the difficulty of reporting critically on vaccines when major advertisers are pharmaceutical companies. They also mention AI and misinformation concerns, including examples of AI fabricating sources and the need to verify information. - Personal stakes, accountability, and political possibilities: Tenpenny discusses personal cost for challenging the vaccine paradigm, including an earlier period of potential licensing scrutiny and professional pushback. She names figures such as Fauci and Birx, argues that accountability has not yet occurred, and expresses hope that public interest in accountability could shift through advocacy and political leadership, citing RFK Jr. as a potential ally though acknowledging political and institutional obstacles. - Treatment and detoxification approaches: For those who have already received vaccines, Tenpenny outlines two separate tracks: detoxification for childhood vaccines and detox for COVID vaccines. For detox, she mentions products such as PureBody Extra (PBX), a zeolite-based supplement she says helps remove metals like aluminum and mercury from the body. She notes it is usable across age groups and even for pets, and she personally uses it. She also discusses non-specific detox approaches such as vitamin D optimization, lymphatic stimulation, exercise, and a diet focusing on avoiding white foods and reducing inflammation. She cautions that there is no proven blood or urine test to quantify spike protein after a COVID vaccine, and that detox strategies aim to support overall health rather than remove embedded spike protein from tissues. - The role of faith and resilience: The interview includes discussions of faith as a guiding force for Tenpenny, including her personal journey toward Christian faith in 2020. They reflect on fear, hope, forgiveness, and the idea that one can act with integrity and do the right thing even when faced with controversy or personal cost. They discuss existential questions about meaning, purpose, and moral responsibility, including the belief that life has a spiritual dimension that informs how to respond to public-health challenges. - Community and parenting: The conversation emphasizes the importance of community networks for new parents, including seeking mentorship from experienced parents and trusted health advocates, and maintaining parental agency in decisions about vaccines, medical interventions, and child-rearing. They discuss the value of critical thinking, asking questions, and avoiding blind trust in professionals or institutions. - Closing notes and resources: Tenpenny provides her websites and a Substack for ongoing information, including dr10penny.com, dr10penny.substack.com, and 10pennywalkwithgod.substack.com, as well as her X profile busy doctor t. The episode closes with a call to viewers to stay informed and to seek second opinions, while thanking the audience for supporting independent journalism. Overall, the dialogue centers on a critical, conspiratorial framing of vaccines, public-health policy, and the medical establishment; it weaves together testimonies about personal experience, policy history (notably the 1986 Act and the PREP Act), alleged systemic failures in compensation for vaccine injuries, criticisms of COVID-19 responses and vaccine mandates, and practical detoxification and faith-based guidance. The promotional content for GiveSendGo lightly interrupts the core discussion, but the majority of the exchange remains an extended argument about vaccine safety, accountability, and the perceived influence of big pharma on health care and public policy.

In January 2022, a colleague alerted Speaker 0 that there had been a doubling or tripling of baby deaths in the last year, which sparked curiosity. Speaker 1 states that “Their own government told us a medical treatment was safe, and it killed babies.” Speaker 2 says she has “lost all faith that Health Canada is looking out genuinely for the best interests of Canadians.” Speaker 3 alleges that doctors “made extra money to push vaccines” and were given a billing code to do it, and that she has “pulled all the billing codes.” Speaker 4 asserts that “They've purchased the vaccine that hasn't been approved,” distributed it to the provinces so that once it’s approved, they can “start jabbing ourselves with it” and “start jabbing pregnant mothers with it.” Speaker 3 questions the necessity of vaccinations: “Why did we have to get these vaccinations? Like, why was this something that we had to do? You go to the hospital, you expect to have a baby, and you expect to go home, and then you don't.” Speaker 0 speculates on criminal negligence, saying, “I would suspect that there was criminal negligence on part of the government and the public health officials.” Speaker 3 notes that it is “highly recommended that pregnant women get their vaccine as soon as possible.” Speaker 0 contends that a narrative was pushed to everybody, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, that the mRNA shots were safe and effective. Speaker 2 claims wiretapping, harassment, charging, and barring expert witnesses: “They had wiretapped her phone. They had harassed her. They had charged her. They didn't allow any expert witnesses to testify.” Speaker 1 accuses police of trying to cover up Canadian babies’ deaths “to the point of stopping detective Helen Greaves from testifying about it.” Speaker 4 observes that “The dominant individuals keep the subordinates in their place by constant aggression.” Speaker 5 discusses vaccination choice versus public risk, remarking, “If you don't wanna get vaccinated, that's your choice. But don't think you can get on a plane or a train besides vaccinated people and put them at risk,” and claims CBC initially “started off with CBC running a story to implicate her and to paint her with a brush that looks uncomplimentary to the public.” Speaker 6 claims Canada must shift its understanding of what the is, describing it as “a state broadcaster pushing the agenda of the Liberal government of Canada.” Speaker 4 calls this “the most significant matter affecting our children today from a health perspective,” noting that authorities are “not investigating.” Speaker 2 concludes that everything emanates outward from this case involving law enforcement, the judicial system, the pharmaceutical industry, and health agencies, “how they work together, how they censored information. It all ties together to this one case, and that's what makes it so dangerous.”

The speaker praises the doctor for being a reliable source of information during the pandemic. They mention that the doctor discussed the origins of the virus, the effectiveness of vaccines and masks, and always provided objective and science-based information. The speaker then brings up a conspiracy theory about the doctor getting someone kicked off Twitter for questioning the COVID vaccine. The doctor chooses not to comment directly on the accusation and expresses concerns about social media platforms not being able to police threats made against individuals. The speaker clarifies that their own experience with COVID and vaccines has been positive. The doctor reiterates their concern about threats being made against people's safety on social media platforms.

The speaker expresses confusion over why there was such intense obsession and hysteria surrounding Ukraine. They mention losing friends over the topic and being confronted by someone who was mad at them for their views on Ukraine. The speaker also discusses the influence of the pharmaceutical industry in controlling media coverage through advertising. They admit to not having expertise in vaccines but had reservations about taking them. When they expressed their concerns, they faced backlash. The speaker questions the motives behind the strong push for vaccines and suggests there may be a powerful force influencing society. The other speaker briefly mentions that the vaccine is safe and effective in preventing serious illness and death.

The speakers emphasize the importance of distinguishing truth from misinformation and the need for everyone to be safe from COVID-19. They stress that until the whole world is safe, no one is safe. They advocate for vaccination, stating that it is the key to ending the pandemic and preventing the spread of the virus. They express frustration and anger towards the unvaccinated, calling them a threat and suggesting consequences for their choices. The speakers argue that vaccines are effective in preventing infection and transmission, while highlighting instances of breakthrough cases. They urge people to get vaccinated and criticize those who rely on their own research. The transcript also mentions the impact of the unvaccinated on the economy and society, and the ongoing battle against COVID-19.

We strongly support vaccinations, especially for younger generations. It can be daunting with warnings for those with health conditions, but it's crucial to ignore misinformation on social media. Vaccinations are vital for clinically vulnerable individuals.

The speakers believe mRNA vaccines were released prematurely, especially for a mutating virus, and should not have been mandated, particularly for children. They argue that vaccinating against a virus with spike mutations is ineffective, as the vaccine (ABC) won't match the virus (FGH). They claim the vaccine kills bifidobacteria, weakening the immune system and leading to repeated COVID infections. They suggest that treatments and vitamins are preferable. The speakers warn about "designer bugs," created by mixing microbes through CRISPR technology, which can be patented, leading to a cycle of new viruses and vaccines. They suggest this approach could extend to every virus, requiring constant vaccination and further weakening immunity, making people susceptible to various viruses. They believe the ultimate goal is to control the population through fear and mandatory vaccinations, potentially leading to a future where people live in protective bubbles.