TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

A prosecutor in Fulton County has been accused of having a romantic relationship with the district attorney. The attorney for one of the defendants in a case alleges that the prosecutor and the district attorney have been in a relationship for a while and have traveled together. However, there is limited evidence to support these claims as some of the evidence has been sealed in the prosecutor's divorce filings. The allegations are currently unsubstantiated.

Fannie Willis, the Fulton County District Attorney, is facing allegations of corruption and campaign finance violations. Investigative reporter James O'Keefe exposed evidence of money laundering through radical organizations like ActBlue. Peter Berninger, a citizen investigator, found that Willis' campaign had violated campaign finance laws by failing to provide names and addresses for 220 donations and accepting $27,000 in excess of the donation limit. Berninger also uncovered evidence of "Smurfing," a form of structured campaign money laundering, totaling $160,000. A complaint has been filed with the Georgia State Ethics Commission. If proven, these violations could lead to Willis' removal from office and potential criminal charges. Similar allegations have been made against Senator Warnock.

We've stopped the $8,000,000 in taxpayer subsidies for Politico subscriptions. The team is working to cancel the payments immediately. Large organizations inevitably miss things. Claims of widespread waste and abuse haven't been substantiated with evidence. We haven't seen proof of the alleged misuse of funds.

Weeks of controversy over allegations of an improper romantic relationship between Fulton County District Attorney Fonny Willis and a special prosecutor in the 2020 election interference case culminated in a lengthy court filing from Willis. The filing, more than 170 pages, includes Willis’s admission of a “personal relationship” with special prosecutor Nathan Wade, but she asserts that relationship should not impact their roles in the case. In January, a defendant in the ongoing 2020 election case moved to disqualify Willis, arguing that she appointed Wade as a special prosecutor and that she financially benefited from the relationship. Willis’s latest motion disputes that portrayal. Eleven Alive previously reported that Wade paid for airline tickets for the pair to travel to San Francisco and Miami; Willis, however, writes that financial responsibility for personal travel is divided roughly evenly between the two, with all expenses paid using individual personal funds. The outlet had also reported that Wade was paid more than $500,000 more than the two other special prosecutors on the case; Willis contends Wade earned more money because he “made much more work.” Legal experts Daryl Cohen and Clark Cunningham offered differing views on how the filing might affect the case going into the February 15 hearing. Cohen suggested the judge could determine that the matter does not require disqualification but that the parties are under intense scrutiny. Cunningham anticipated the disqualification issue would not be resolved at the hearing and described the matter as very complicated. The February 15 hearing will be the first time these allegations are publicly addressed in open court. In a related matter, the US House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan released a letter indicating he subpoenaed documents from Willis. The subpoena seeks documents related to the DA’s use of federal funds after a conservative outlet published accusations that Willis fired an employee who attempted to halt the misuse of federal funds intended for youth gang prevention programs. The documents are also linked to the January 6 investigation. Atlanta News First political reporter Doug Reardon reported from outside the Fulton County Courthouse that the open records requests were issued through Georgia’s open records law. The judge, Robert McBurney, previously admonished Willis for not complying within required time frames, with the court asserting that Willis must turn over documents requested by the conservative nonprofit Judicial Watch. The judge stated that Willis had five days to produce the documents and that, according to him, the court had effectively declared a violation of the Open Records Act. Some communications, he noted, are of public interest and not protected by privilege.

Yesterday, we told you that new documents we got showed that Fonny Willis was recording was working secretly behind the scenes with the Biden justice department, the Biden White House, and the j six democrats to create a double jeopardy, double drain on Donald Trump's supporters by creating a similar indictment to Jack Smith, but in Georgia to move resources and lawyers and and attention span and divide it. We have we're supposed to have a justice system that avoids double jeopardy, but in this case, you can see the plot being created by these lawyers and by the collaboration. Today, we raise a question or we provide some evidence to a question that Jim Jordan raised about a year ago, the House Judiciary Committee Chairman. He believed that Fonny Willis' prosecution of Trump was being underwritten by the justice department because he saw a stream of funding. What we see, what we've provided to the public, is an unusual situation. In the middle of Willis building your case against Donald Trump and 18 of his allies and and to charge them with conspiracy in and racketeering in Georgia to double up on what Jack Smith charged in Washington, The justice department comes to Fonny Willis and says, hey. We just want you to apply for this grant, and we're gonna take this grant, which is normally competitive. We're gonna make it noncompetitive. Basically, you're the only one that's gonna get the money. Just fill out the paperwork and take your cash, about $2,000,000. It's that classic Washington grant, go help kids, not really much specificity, but they move it from competitive to sole source, meaning that it's wired just for her. It looks like the old Boss Hogg way of doing business or Tammany Hall way of doing business. And I think for Jim Jordan or Barry Loudermilk who was on our show last night investigating January 6 from the judiciary committee, this is a pretty serious issue for them to investigate. This looks like a gift grant to Fonny Willis while she's doing the bidding of Joe Biden to pursue and tie down Donald Trump and his friends in a criminal prosecution in Atlanta. It looks just like Tammany Hall, Chicago style politics, and there's now a complete body of documents for congress to look at this. It's it's a pretty pretty clear case of what's going on.

Just the News reports a story based on thousands of pages of documents obtained over years with the help of America First Legal, focusing on Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and her prosecution of a state case against Donald Trump that mirrored the federal case led by Jack Smith. The documents, they say, show that Willis was in deep collusion with the Justice Department, with the January 6 Democrats, and with the Biden White House. The claim is that the Biden White House said it would waive Donald Trump’s executive privilege for Willis, and the Justice Department said it would waive and approve Willis’s 2E requests to obtain federal workers to help build a case against a national figure at the state level. The report asserts the “fix was in” and that this constitutes the strongest evidence to date of coordinated action to pursue Trump across jurisdictions. The asserted significance is that the Democrats intentionally and strategically created a double jeopardy, double drain machine to go after Trump, potentially infringing civil liberties by pursuing prosecutions in multiple venues for the same or related conduct. The narrative claims this involved the Biden White House, the Biden DOJ, and the January 6 Democrats pressing Willis to create a system where Trump could be targeted in more than one place, a scenario described as a “double jeopardy, double drain.” The report suggests this development is now focused in Miami and anticipates further disclosures. Looking ahead, the program teases next steps: tomorrow they plan to reveal whether there was a financial incentive or “financial follow the money” stream to Willis tied to her pursuit. They note that if this pattern occurred in Georgia, there are similar election cases in Wisconsin and Arizona, raising questions about federal taxpayers funding state efforts to smear Trump and create multi-state double jeopardy scenarios. The discussion frames these elements as part of a conspiracy case beginning to unfold in Miami. Upcoming segments are promised to include new election integrity revelations from figures like Tulsi Gabbard, Kash Patel, and Pam Bondi. These revelations are expected to concern intrusions and issues targeting the 2026 election, with the aim of informing Senate members—potentially swaying those on the fence about the Save or related measures. The program signals that these developments will be explored in upcoming appearances, including guests such as Barry Loudermilk.

Lover boy finalizes divorce to be with Fannie, but they face subpoenas regarding their actions together. Fanny's office has a whistleblower, Amanda Timpson, who recorded Fanny's aide, Michael Kufi, allegedly misusing federal grant money. The whistleblower confronted Fanny about it. Fanny fired the whistleblower, claiming she didn't meet her standards. It seems that Fanny's office has a pattern of using public money for personal expenses, such as trips and swag. It's worth noting that Fanny is involved in prosecuting Trump.

The video discusses allegations of corruption involving the Fulton County District Attorney, Fannie Willis, and her boyfriend, Nathan Wade. It is claimed that Willis hired Wade, who had no experience in prosecuting felony cases, to prosecute former President Trump. Additionally, it is alleged that Willis used public funds to go on lavish trips with Wade. Documents suggest that Wade had meetings with the Biden White House while investigating Trump, raising concerns about collusion. The video argues that this case is riddled with conflicts of interest and corruption. The speakers express disbelief at the audacity of the alleged actions and criticize the lack of consequences for Willis.

Margie, there's a scandal in Georgia involving Fannie Willis, who is running an anti-Trump operation. She allegedly paid her boyfriend $650,000 and went on expensive trips with him using taxpayer money. Some people are arguing that this undermines the racketeering charges against them. It's also been revealed that her boyfriend had consulting ties with the Biden White House. Many Georgians, including myself, are fed up with Willis using her position and taxpayer dollars to target Trump and his allies instead of prosecuting real criminals. I'm urging Governor Kemp and Attorney General Chris Carr to investigate and prosecute Willis and her boyfriend for their corrupt actions. This witch hunt needs to end immediately.

I visited a Hamas encampment at the University of Washington where supporters shared a phone number for a bail fund. The number given was different from the official one listed on the fund's website. Background checks revealed the number belonged to a 37-year-old woman in Washington State. When I called the number, it went to a generic voicemail. Questions remain about who is behind the number and where the money is coming from. It seems important to call in the afternoon or evening for assistance.

Donald Trump and Fulton County District Attorney Fawney Willis are engaged in a heated dispute. Trump is running an ad in Atlanta, accusing Willis of having a relationship with someone she was investigating. However, there is currently no evidence to support this claim. In response, Willis sent an email to her staff instructing them not to comment on the allegations or any negativity directed towards her or the office. She emphasized that employees are not allowed to make public comments on social media or any other platform. The leaked email has raised suspicions.

The video discusses allegations of corruption involving the Fulton County District Attorney, Fannie Willis, and her boyfriend, Nathan Wade. It is claimed that Willis hired Wade, who had no experience prosecuting felony cases, to prosecute Donald Trump. Additionally, it is alleged that Willis used public funds to go on expensive trips with Wade. Documents show that Wade met with the Biden White House while investigating Trump, raising concerns about collusion. The video suggests that the case against Trump should be dropped due to the conflicts of interest and corruption involved. The discussion concludes with commentary on the absurdity of the situation and the likelihood of consequences for Willis.

Fannie Willis, a district attorney, is facing allegations of corruption and campaign finance violations. Investigative reporter James O'Keefe exposed evidence of money laundering through radical organizations. Peter Berninger, a citizen investigator, found that Willis' campaign had violated campaign finance laws by not providing names and addresses for donations and exceeding donation limits. Berninger also uncovered evidence of "Smurfing," a form of structured campaign money laundering, totaling $160,000. He filed a complaint with the Georgia State Ethics Commission, accusing Willis of using fraudulent and illegal funds for her campaigns. The hope is that she will be held accountable and potentially face arrest and indictment. Similar allegations are being made against other candidates, including Senator Warnock.

I investigated payments made to attorneys from the civil forfeiture fund related to Young Thug's property confiscation. Just eight days after the action was filed, Nathan Wade, Fannie Willis' boyfriend, received multiple payments from this fund. In response to inquiries from Newsweek, Fulton County claimed it was a clerical error and that the fund was kept low, making attorney payments unlikely. However, I found substantial payments made from the fund, including to Wade and other lawyers in 2022. This contradicts the district attorney's statement, raising questions about their claims. The Fulton County District Attorney's Office needs to clarify this situation, and I will continue to investigate.

I'm calling for an investigation to uncover who in the government has been receiving kickbacks from USAID. Doge's congressional audits reveal that three Democrat senators have each inexplicably gained over $20,000,000 in net worth. When questioned, they claimed the wealth simply appeared. These files have now been handed over to Pam Bondi at the Justice Department. If they're found guilty of using taxpayer money to enrich themselves, what consequences do you think they should face? Share your thoughts in the comments on what actions should be taken against those who steal from American citizens.

We've uncovered some unusual financial discrepancies. Several individuals in bureaucratic positions with modest salaries have amassed tens of millions of dollars in net worth. One example involves a woman who walked away with approximately $30,000,000. We're curious about the source of this wealth. Perhaps they are skilled investors, but it seems more likely that they are enriching themselves at the expense of taxpayers. We are investigating to determine how this occurred.

Okay, so this Reuters thing is way bigger than we thought. Elon Musk mentioned Reuters getting government payments, and it goes deeper. I checked out usaspending.gov and found over 41 payments to Reuters. When you look this up on USAspending.gov, you can see all the individual payments yourself. Also, there is a graph at the bottom of the page, and the numbers are insane! We seriously need answers about this.

We've uncovered some unusual financial discrepancies. Several bureaucrats with modest salaries have amassed tens of millions of dollars in net worth during their employment. One example involves a woman who walked away with approximately $30,000,000. This is particularly notable in USAID. We're investigating the source of this wealth. Perhaps they are skilled investors, but it seems more likely that this wealth accumulation is occurring at the expense of the organization. We're looking into it and trying to determine where this money originated.

Fannie Willis, the Fulton County District Attorney, is facing allegations of corruption and campaign finance violations. Investigative reporter James O'Keefe exposed evidence of money laundering through radical organizations like ActBlue. Peter Berninger, a citizen investigator, has found campaign finance violations in Willis' reports, including donations without names or addresses and donations exceeding the limit. Berninger also uncovered evidence of "Smurfing," a form of structured campaign money laundering, totaling $160,000. He has filed a complaint with the Georgia State Ethics Commission, alleging that over 50% of Willis' campaign contributions were obtained unlawfully. Berninger hopes for an investigation and potential arrest and indictment of Willis. Similar allegations are being made against Senator Warnock.

Atlanta mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms' campaign made payments to a consulting firm owned by Ralph Jones Jr., the son of a senior leader in the Fulton County election office. The payments were made just before the mayoral runoff election in December 2017, which Bottoms won by a narrow margin. The consulting firm's involvement raises concerns about a conflict of interest, as Ralph Jones Sr. is listed as the registered agent. The Georgia secretary of state's office is conducting a forensic review of the runoff due to allegations of irregularities. Mayor Bottoms' spokesperson stated that the payments were for Jones Jr.'s expertise as the campaign's social media director, while Bottoms' challenger, Mary Norwood, called for an investigation into the election results.

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis spoke publicly for the first time since being accused of hiring an underqualified romantic partner and paying him over $650,000 to help prosecute former President Trump and 18 co-defendants in the Georgia election tampering case. She defended special prosecutor Nathan Wade, implying that he is being targeted because of his race. Co-defendant Michael Roman's attorney, Ashley Merchant, argued that Wade is inexperienced and that his race is not the issue. The Fulton County DA's office will respond to the defense motion in a court filing.

In April 2024, the Biden-Harris administration, through the EPA, allocated $7 billion to the United Climate Fund, part of a larger $20 billion Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund hidden within the Inflation Reduction Act. This money was funneled to Power Forward Communities, connected to Stacey Abrams, lacking transparency and accountability. An EPA official revealed this as an "insurance policy" against Trump winning the election, indicating a rushed cash dump. The $20 billion was stashed at Citibank but is now being reclaimed by the government. This isn't incompetence; it's calculated theft.

President Trump's case in Georgia is facing a sex scandal involving the district attorney, Fannie Willis. She is accused of appointing her lover, Nathan Wade, as a special prosecutor in the case against Trump. Wade, who has limited experience in high-profile cases, has already been paid nearly $1 million in legal fees. These payments were authorized by Willis using taxpayer money. They have allegedly enjoyed luxury vacations together and Willis does not deny hiring someone she is romantically involved with to prosecute the case.

The judge overseeing the Trump Georgia election interference case has scheduled a hearing for February 15th to investigate allegations of misconduct by district attorney Fani Willis. Willis and one of her prosecutors are being examined for a potential improper relationship and misuse of public funds. While Willis has not confirmed or denied a romantic relationship, she referred to the prosecutor as a great friend. She believes that the criticism against her and the prosecutor is racially motivated. This development has sparked Republican attacks, including from Governor Kemp, and has fueled claims of political persecution against Trump.