reSee.it - Related Video Feed

"Out the crime statistics? Not not exactly like I need you need conservatives to be afraid of getting killed when they go to events so that they look to their leadership to turn down the temperature." "The issue is right now, they don't feel like there's any fear." "It's like memes. It's just memes to everybody, I guess." "I'm playing video games. Okay? I'm done today. I don't give a fuck." "God, I'm it's gonna be so fucking gay if I get killed in the next fucking two months of shit I'm doing." "Well, the cuck shit out here, please don't anybody make any actual fucking the most cucked weak ass fucking bullshit ass speeches on my side." "God, if it happens, holy shit. I'm gonna make a death note before I go out to go live and not god, it's so cucked. It's so optics cucked."

The speaker records a conversation with law enforcement officers regarding online threats they have received. They clarify that they do not advocate violence and are only using words to express their opinions. They mention receiving death threats and express concern for their family's safety. The officers advise them to report the threats and offer to make their house a lookout. The speaker emphasizes that they have no criminal record and do not possess any weapons. They believe that criticism should be allowed for all groups and advocate for peaceful dialogue. They express frustration with being labeled as hateful for expressing their views.

Ready to throw a punch at Trump, suggesting violence. Talk of beating him up in high school, taking him out, putting a bullet in him. Mention of blowing up the White House, getting in the face of congresspeople. Warning to Kavanaugh about paying the price. Soldiers should make them pay. Question about surviving an elevator with Trump, Pence, or Sessions.

Officers arrived at Farzin Khurthin’s private home without a warrant and without stated exigent circumstances, demanding the resident open the door and produce his daughter for an unannounced inspection. Khurthin responded that he could not open the door at that time and offered to communicate by message or intercom. When officers insisted he come to the door, Khurthin said he would rather talk over the intercom and objected to the officers’ presence. Khurthin asked what gave them the right to come to his home, demanded the reason for their presence, and stated that he was being harassed and that his constitutional rights were being violated. He said he would record the encounter, questioned the officers’ authority given they had no warrant, and said they were on his property illegally. He repeatedly refused to bring his sleeping daughter to the door and argued that the officers were attempting to scrutinize his child without lawful authority. Khurthin requested the officers’ full names and badge numbers. Deputy Adler provided a badge number (3783) and said the department was the County Sheriff’s Office. Khurthin told officers that if they obtained a warrant and arrested him for any suspected crime, he would go that route, but he did not trust law enforcement to act correctly. During the exchange, Khurthin accused someone of filing false charges and described an alleged history of prior complaints and charges, including that an assault charge was null crossed for lack of evidence. He stated that this was harassment under color of law, threatened prosecution and legal action, and said he would take further steps with his lawyer. He also referenced the use of taxpayer dollars and claimed “government abuse.” Khurthin characterized the situation as a violation “at the deepest level,” maintained that officers had no right to be on his property without a warrant, and ordered them to leave and return only with a warrant. The account concludes by asserting that the Fourth Amendment prohibits warrantless government intrusion into the home absent consent, a valid warrant, or clearly articulated exigent circumstances, and that officers did not establish such circumstances during the encounter.

"Why am I being arrested? We told you. We tried to take what do you mean he tried to kill me? He tried to assassinate me." "You know, one of your people tried to kill me. Right? Female? Why are you getting close to my breast? You just touched my breast with your chest." "Ma'am, step out. You're not okay." "We're gonna step back out. My female partner here is gonna do a search." "There's no player in the game, and you know it." "You are Islamophobic." "Don't get in my do not touch my privacy. Do not touch my private." "I am not giving you any of my information." "I am under duress. You are under arrest." "Where is your ID at?" "Her purse? Just her ID."

In the aftermath of a crime, publicity is common, but the judge ultimately decides at trial. The speaker wants a trial in Collin County so Collin County citizens can decide the case. The speaker no longer understands the situation. The individuals involved have had their personal addresses exposed and have received graphic and racist threats. Authorities are limited in what actions they can take, even if they wanted to do more.

- "Do you know who Ray Epps is, and where is he? And, is he sitting behind bars like some of these other, protesters who've been sitting there without bail for so long?" - "And what we need to know is whether or not that cooperation existed on January 5 and January 6 to get people to do things that they might otherwise not do, like enter the capital." - "We already know as a consequence of reporting in revolver.news and in re really, that was confirmed by the New York Times that there were people texting their handlers from the crowd in January 5 and January 6." - "Now we just need to know whether the folks being controlled by the federal government were, in fact, the very people that were doing the worst things on January 6."

Speaker 1 admits that mentioning being armed was to deter threats. They regret their choice of words and clarified their friend never said that. They received threats and harassment online even 14 months later, with a recent influx after a court subpoena.

The Supreme Court ruled that the felony charges against many January 6 protesters were unjust and should not have happened. We have been unfairly persecuted, prosecuted, and imprisoned. It is time to release my people.

I threatened violence against Trump, encouraged confronting politicians, and suggested physically attacking Trump. I also mentioned the need for street unrest until our lives improve and mentioned putting a bullet in Trump.

- One speaker claims to have known about vaccine problems for years, but was dismissed as a conspiracy theorist until it was reported on TV. - Another speaker alleges that a "hoax" was uncovered in highly classified documents related to the 2016 election, involving Hillary Clinton and the Steele dossier. They credit Tulsi for finding the information, describing it as an attempted but failed coup. - One speaker declares "I'm dynamite, TNT" and "Watch me explode. Win a fight." - Another speaker expresses concern about due process, freedom of speech, and secret police activity, claiming people are being picked up off the streets despite having a legal right to be here.

The speaker discusses a recently published Homeland Security Task Force website, hstf.gov, describing it as an onrushing, dystopian plan that involves a multi-agency force at local, state, and federal levels. They emphasize this is not ICE and insist it represents a regime rather than a single agency, likening it to stormtroopers or Hunger Games “peacekeepers” who would operate in every city, county, town, or borough. Key points highlighted include: - The executive order purportedly requires all individuals in the country without documentation to register themselves, including facing self-incriminating questions, with a claim that the government will eliminate documents needed to deport someone and that due process is over. The executive order is said to directly call out and link to other executive orders as part of a broader plan. - The speaker references an executive order described as “strengthening and unleashing America’s law enforcement to pursue criminals and protect innocent citizens,” which supposedly links to others and to the website, presenting a puzzle-like chain of documents and websites. - It is claimed that military assets would be used in ordinary towns, involving training of nonlethal capabilities, with personnel and nonlethal weapons possibly deployed on streets to prevent crime. - The rhetoric asserts that the regime will use this framework to charge state and local officials criminally if they obstruct criminal law, or if they engage in discrimination or civil rights violations under the guise of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives that purportedly restrict law enforcement activities and endanger citizens. - The speaker contends that this program would compel compliance from law enforcement at state and local levels or face criminal charges, and describes the situation as the makings of a civil war or the shredding and burning of the Constitution. - A universal alarm is issued: any American who believes in the Constitution should “rise up in the streets,” and the speaker urges listeners to look at the website themselves, arguing that federal, state, and local law enforcement would work as one. - The overall characterization is that this is a regime, not ICE, and that the actions described resemble Gestapo-like powers, marking the beginning of a restructuring that threatens constitutional rights. The speaker uses strong language to frame the task force as a nationwide, coordinated, militarized effort that would erode due process, expand surveillance and control, and subvert civil liberties, urging immediate public opposition.

The speaker explains he is trying to navigate possible collaboration with federal authorities while maintaining personal integrity. He says he has a statement that is “completely true” that he’s “never been in contact with any federal authority,” and he’s torn about how to start working with DHS to address threats he faces as a national figure. He claims “the Yemenis, a million of them came out into the streets” and that they want to kill him, with a fatwa on his head. He asserts he would need DHS to make a statement that “the Houthis and their fatwa that they placed on my head will not be stood,” and that “American citizens exercising our rights will not be, you know, subject to to Muslim murder, rituals.” He describes hundreds of thousands of death threats in his DMs and says, to deal with them, he would need to walk into an FBI building and give them a printout, but he “don’t fucking trust the FBI.” He accuses the FBI of having “destroyed my life,” pointing to past raids on his and others’ homes and references to the Mar-a-Lago search, stating he is trying to figure out how to navigate this situation without claiming contact with Harmeet or making contacts he “don’t want to.” He notes that when he and others exercised their rights in Dearborn, he views it as a civil rights hate crime, saying “the Muslim oppression of Christians in Dearborn” was a civil rights hate violation and that “they punched me in the face because I’m white” and “they punched me in the face because I’m Christian, not for anything else.” Harmony Dillon is described as wanting to prosecute this as a hate crime, with others subjected to spit, food thrown, assaults, pepper spray, etc. He mentions the Trump administration’s purported interest in bringing these people to justice, but he expresses a wish not to feed into it, citing personal integrity and caution. He questions whether the rank-and-file FBI officer’s motives are aligned with his interests, contrasting a year ago with a “grandma that walked through the capital” to now a Muslim who punched a Christian, implying hypocrisy or moral decline. He asserts there are “deep state embedded figures in the DOJ, in the FBI, in DHS,” who were involved in actions like the raid on Mar-a-Lago and other “schemes.” He says he needs assurance that these agencies have “our best interest” and that they are not “deep state shills.” Ultimately, he states he has refused to make contact because it’s “too risky” and he cannot be associated with people he deems “un American.”

"The president has been trying to provoke violence here, right here, in the black communities and in the brown communities, having ICE kidnap our neighbors, having black having the black community be harassed and profiled and want, want a response. We say, hell no. We won't go." "Today, we get today today, we gather to speak plainly about policy path that sounds strong, but in truth, it weakens the very safety we see." "Black people are more likely to be stopped, searched, questioned, arrested, and harmed encounters with the law." "When we add the president of federal agents or the national guard to daily life in these neighborhoods, the burden can multiply." "We're fighting for freedom and safety for all people."

Who are you, people of policing? Are you enforcing tyranny? No, you're not. You've broken into this property and are making an arrest without a warrant. Where is the warrant? It doesn’t exist. What are the charges? Why are you taking money? I just want to know your name.

If he did his job, I wouldn't need to do this. I received a malicious report. Look, they're all pointing. Someone's on the roof. There he is, laying down. We have dangerous people in our country causing trouble.

The speaker asserts that white supremacists who came with planned, premeditated threats were not peaceful, and states, “I don’t have to be peaceful. I don’t owe anybody peace.” They reference a sign described as “Piece of shit. That sign.” A few weeks later, felony indecent exposure charges were filed against this registered sex offender.

Speaker 0 questions Nicole about online posts to the Prime Minister of Canada, asking if she has anything to say about that. Speaker 1 asks for specifics: what post, what she specifically said, and whether there is a screenshot. Speaker 0 cites that she online said something specific and asks for clarification. Speaker 1 replies that she said, "he's a Zionist scumbag, and he's not my prime minister," adding that she believes she is not spoken to properly and questions whether she looks like a threat. Speaker 0 explains that they came to talk because those threats were made. Speaker 1 pushes back, saying that the officers should be busy addressing real crime rather than harassing her over things she says online, and questions whether she seriously looks like a threat. Speaker 0 acknowledges and continues. Speaker 1 accuses the officers of wasting tax dollars and asserts that they should not be harassing her for what she says online because she dislikes the prime minister. Speaker 0 states Nicole should be aware that if such behavior continues, there will be consequences, implying potential arrest for threats. Speaker 1 asks what kind of threats they are referring to and demands to see what she said, noting that she still has not been shown. Speaker 0 attempts to explain what she said and what constitutes threats, warning that if those threats continue, she could be arrested and charged. Speaker 1 complains about being interrupted, asking to show what she said, and then launches into a hostile remark, calling the situation Communist Canada and asking how the officers can take pride in their work. Speaker 0 reiterates that she may have her opinion, but she insists she cannot say what she says. Speaker 1 refuses to discuss further, telling them not to touch her door. Speaker 0 says a report will be filed, stating that the search behavior continues, and mentions Trump in a dismissive way ("the Trump blah blah blah blah blah"). Speaker 1 asserts she will say whatever she wants about the prime minister and that they cannot control her speech, calling it just words. Speaker 0 responds that they are asking for non-threatening language. Speaker 1 concludes by stating they will continue to speak freely and that the conversation is over, wishing them a nice day and goodbye.

Nathalie Rose Jones is now in custody, charged with two federal crimes for knowingly and willfully threatening to take the life of the President of The United States. She did come from New York to Washington DC, and she has been threatening and calling for the removal of the President and even worse as she got to DC. Her threats were on Facebook and Instagram, and she continued to call the president a terrorist and was working to have him eliminated. She is now in custody. She will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Make no mistake about that.

He isn't coming right now, but if he does, I might lose my temper. I'm prepared to face the consequences, even if it means going to jail. I'm frustrated about the situation involving trespassing on the Capitol grounds.

- "Honestly, if I catch a Muslim that's coming at me and blow his head off outside my home and I get it on video, be the most viral video of all time." - "Jake Lange blows the head off of a Muslim trying to jihad him, watched it in slow motion four k from a ring doorbell. Pretty cool." - "If I get the opportunity to to slay one of these disgusting animals that's trying to threaten me and my country and my family, You know, don't threaten me with a good time." - "I mean, kind of a kind of base." - "If that ever happens, this livestream is they're totally gonna, like, play this at your trial." - "No. I mean, hey. It was listen. It was premeditated defense." - "What the fuck? They have a fatwa on me. I didn't clear the fatwa." - "I never just It's gonna take the fucking breath. Get in the"

"you're under arrest currently, right, on suspicion of harassment." "the grounds of the arrest are that from the March 10, you've made apparently a number of posts online and on social media harassing an individual who came making serious allegations." "Someone from the church." "We've got serious safeguarding concerns." "But we need to interview you in relation to that investigation have been made." "My children are 12, 13, and eight." "First of all, there's three things that we need to do." "I've got three young children here on the property." "They don't I don't know where they are."

Two voices, Speaker 0 and Speaker 1, erupt in a heated argument filled with confrontation, insults, and conflicting accusations. Speaker 0 insists he did not assault anybody and denies any wrongdoing, repeatedly accusing others of criminal behavior and bullying. He berates the others as “piece of shit,” “fat bucks,” and “bunch of fucking pussies,” while predicting that they will die a “sad fucking lonely death.” He claims, “Arresting American citizens” and says, “You slam it on him,” denying that he slammed the door. He asserts that “you guys are abducting people off the streets” and challenges the group to meet him, asking for a street wave and directing them to a location. Speaker 1 challenges Speaker 0, urging him to avoid assault and to provide clarification on what just happened. He notes that they “exited here” and that they are “around you guys.” He and Speaker 0 discuss their location: “ Sheridan and Belmont. Sheridan and Belmont. We’re on the corner,” specifying the intersection to reach them. He asks for patience, saying “Hold on. Stand by.” He reports surrounding actions and voices concern about the confrontation, emphasizing they will soon be in contact with each other and that they are near the other party. The exchange grows more acrimonious as Speaker 0 continues to threaten and insult, telling the other party to tell a Facebook group where they are “Camping out like a bunch of buck bunch of fucking pussies.” He repeats the charge that others are “arresting American citizens” and asserts that the situation is not assault, while Speaker 1 maintains it could be considered assault “at the next stoplight.” The dialogue reveals a tense, personal clash, with Speaker 0 attacking the other side’s families and immigration background: “All your families came from different fucking countries.” As the tension escalates, both speakers exchange directions and indications of where they are relative to the others. Speaker 0 directs a left turn at various landmarks, asking, “Where do I turn? I turn left, turn left, right, turn left,” and acknowledges the need to communicate their location to the other group. The dialogue ends with continued dispute over the events, the concept of assault, and where each party should proceed, punctuated by raw insults and threats. The exchange centers on alleged abduction and assault, the fear of being targeted by authorities, and the urge to confront the other group at a nearby intersection near Sheridan and Belmont.

"Our intelligence indicates that these people are organized." "They're getting more and more people on their team as far as attacking officers, and they're making plans to ambush them and to kill them." "We have specific officers and agents that have bounties that have been put out on their heads." "It's been $2,000 to kidnap them, dollars 10,000 to kill them." "They've released their pictures." "They've sent them between their networks, and it's an extremely dangerous situation and unprecedented." "We 've put protective detail around those individuals, changed some of our operations to keep our officers safe." "But make no mistake, this isn't just about protesting free speech or that they don't like that people out here are upholding the law of our country." "They're actually going out there and saying, kill these people and we'll give you this much money to do it."

"I don't answer questions. Call them." "The days of you coming out here fucking the people is over." "They jumped out on you. Jumped out. Like some dumbasses." "No. We're not. We're about to make it so they can't come on the block no more." "I asked you to leave me alone if I'm not committing crime." "If I got a license to carry, there ain't no point in you talking to me no more." "Because you came here for me." "You came here because you gotta call somebody carrying guns, and I'm the only one here with a gun." "And I could contact Octavian Williams, which is my attorney, and I could file a suit against everybody here." "Call your supervisor." "Get the fuck out of my face." "You don't know me. You better Google me." "I will sue the fuck out of you."