TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker admits to reporting the attorney general to the FBI without evidence of any criminal activity. When questioned about this, the speaker avoids directly answering and instead emphasizes their "good faith belief" that a crime had occurred. They also claim to have not collected any evidence after making the complaint. The questioning becomes tense as the speaker is repeatedly asked if they had any evidence to support their claims, but they continue to evade a direct answer.

With a swipe of my pen, I can charge someone with a misdemeanor, the lowest level of attempts possible. By virtue of that swipe, you will have to go to a courthouse and stand in line. You will have to hire an attorney. You may get arrested for a few hours and be embarrassed in your community. You will miss time from coming on to the Google campus, all because I've charged you with a crime, which I may choose to dismiss 2 weeks later. It's an incredible amount of power.

Director Wray is questioned about the FBI's handling of the Steele dossier and the investigation into Brian Oden, an FBI intelligence analyst. The speaker highlights that the FBI continued to use the dossier's allegations in FISA applications despite knowing they were false. They also mention that Oden, who was under investigation for potential corruption and FISA abuse, was assigned to assess evidence against the Biden family. The speaker expresses concern about the FBI's actions and asks about consequences. Director Wray acknowledges the conduct described in the Durham report as unacceptable and assures ongoing personnel processes. The speaker emphasizes the need for transparency regarding FISA court abuse.

The speaker states they have referred documents to the Department of Justice and the FBI to investigate potential criminal implications, including those for former President Obama. According to the speaker, evidence directly points to President Obama leading the manufacturing of an intelligence assessment. The speaker claims there are multiple pieces of evidence and intelligence confirming this.

The speaker discusses the FBI's investigation into a person accused of espionage. The FBI mistakenly believed that the person had left the country, but he was actually living in DC. Despite this, the FBI hired him and paid him over $200,000, even though they knew he was a Russian spy. The speaker also mentions another individual, Charles Dolan, who was a source for the false dossier used to spy on American citizens. Dolan and the Russian spy even met on a park bench, but the FBI refused to interview Dolan. The speaker criticizes the FBI's actions and highlights the problem of running investigations from headquarters instead of assigning a US attorney.

Speaker 1 asserts that there is a two-tier justice system weaponized to persecute people based on political beliefs, and that Director Wray has personally helped weaponize the FBI against conservatives. He references the Twitter files, Missouri v. Biden disclosures, the Durham investigation and report, and the exposure and collapse of the Russian collusion hoax. He asks Director Wray what he is prepared to do to reform federal law enforcement to earn back the trust of the American people, noting that he asked Mister Durham about this, and Durham said he did not think things can go too much further given that law enforcement, particularly the FBI or Department of Justice, runs a two-tiered system of justice. Speaker 0 responds by disagreeing with the other speaker’s characterization, saying the description of his bias against conservatives seems insane given his personal background. He explains that the approach to protecting the American people and upholding the Constitution starts with emphasizing to his staff to do the right thing in the right way, which means following the facts wherever they lead, no matter who likes it. He outlines several actions: enhanced procedures, safeguards, approvals, double checks and triple checks, record-keeping requirements, accountability policies, and funding for new functions like an Office of Internal Audit that didn’t exist before. He notes the installation of an entirely new leadership team from his predecessor and asserts that where he can take action, he will to hold people accountable by removing them from the chain of command. The exchange ends with an invitation to speak further, though the remark is truncated: “Gentlemen, ladies, time to speak to the….”

The FBI's key witness in the trial against Ahmed Abu Khatallah was paid $1 million and brought to the US, despite being related to members of the mortar team. The witness falsely accused Khatallah of being the mastermind behind the attack, when it was actually AQIM commander Mokhtar Belmokhtar. This reveals a pattern of protecting terrorists in Benghazi, including harboring them in America. The FBI's mishandling of the case poses a threat to national security, as the witness lives close to the CIA. It is crucial for someone to address these errors and protect Americans.

If an FBI employee leaked an ICE memo, allowing gang members to evade capture, there should be consequences. Interfering with legitimate law enforcement operations, like deporting criminals, is a serious offense that should be prosecuted. Leaking information to criminals that jeopardizes the safety of law enforcement officials is as wrong as it gets. I believe the Justice Department will investigate and prosecute anyone found to be tipping off criminals and helping them evade law enforcement.

DNI Gabbard released 100 documents proving Hillary Clinton created a dossier. Obama's team was informed and then created a diversion to make it about Trump. The bureaucracy and the swamp must be drained. FBI and DOJ career employees who participated should be fired and prosecuted. The federal government was weaponized against a citizen and political opponent because the American people were not doing what they wanted. There was anecdotal evidence this was happening, and now the receipts have been shown. Prosecutions should begin.

After a 4-year investigation, the justice department released a 300-page report on the FBI's failures. Members of Congress will bring in John Durham to review the findings. The investigation confirms what we already knew from a previous inspector general report: the FBI did not uphold their duty to follow the law in certain events and activities related to the crossfire hurricane and intelligence operations.

The speaker discusses the problem with the Department of Justice's (DOJ) interview process. Currently, there is no verbatim record of suspect interviews, only a summary form called FD 302. This lack of recording was exploited in the case of Michael Flynn, where FBI officials manipulated the 302 to charge him with lying. To prevent such abuses, the speaker proposes the Fair Act, which would require all DOJ officers to record interviews of Americans accused of criminal offenses. This act aims to ensure fairness for defendants and hold the DOJ and FBI accountable. The speaker emphasizes the importance of protecting the rights of all Americans.

The FBI is being accused of corruption and targeting politicians, parents, and ordinary citizens. Whistleblowers have bravely come forward, facing retaliation and being blocked from working both inside and outside the FBI. This is a troubling time for the American people.

The FBI allegedly maintains a list of over 5,000 employees involved in the January 6 investigation, though US Attorneys are reportedly not included. Some individuals are purportedly being treated poorly for performing their assigned duties related to the investigation. These duties involved investigating facts and applying them to legal standards as guided by prosecutors. This work is described as non-political.

How many illegal FISA queries have occurred under your leadership? Reports indicate over a million errors among 3.4 million queries. Do you disagree with the inspector general's assessment? I don't have those numbers right now. The court noted over 200,000 violations during your tenure. Did you knowingly mislead Senator Lee about Pfizer's involvement in the January 6 investigation? I did not perjure myself; I believed Pfizer was not involved at the time. The court found FBI personnel conducted improper queries for personal reasons. What accountability measures have been taken? There have been disciplinary actions, but I can't discuss specifics. The FBI's trust is at an all-time low, and people feel you aren't providing honest answers. In Florida, applications to work for us have increased over 100%. We are proud of our agents and they deserve better.

The FBI was accused of treason and illegal spying, but the truth is that all of that was nonsense. I was wrong about the FISA process being handled in a thoughtful and appropriate way; I was overconfident. The Steele reporting played a central and essential role in the decision to seek a FISA order, but the FBI didn't conclude that Steele's reporting was bunk after talking to a sub source. As director, I wasn't informed on the details of the investigation. The inspector general did not find misconduct by any FBI people, but mistakes, negligence, and oversight. One FBI lawyer doctored a document. The inspector general did not find political bias or illegal conduct, but significant mistakes. The American people were given false information about the FBI. It is honest, and flawed. It's unclear if there was gross incompetence, negligence, or intentionality.

Speaker 0 questions if anyone has been held accountable for lying to the FISA court for the Carter Page warrant. Speaker 1 mentions an ongoing disciplinary process. Speaker 0 expresses concern about reauthorizing extraordinary authorities due to the agency's history of abuses and concealing information about allegations against the president. Speaker 1 tries to shift the focus to reforms, but Speaker 0 insists on discussing the reauthorization of section 702, highlighting the agency's track record of abuse, illegal surveillance, and political targeting.

The DOJ can't comment on ongoing investigations, but there has been a lot of activity recently. The DOJ doesn't act rashly; rules, requirements, and ethical considerations go into everything presented to a court, such as indictments or subpoenas. Despite the speaker only starting their job four months ago, and others joining even more recently, the DOJ has been incredibly active. The expectation is that there will be a lot of activity and increasing activity going forward on this front, as well as many others.

The speaker expresses concern about the politicization and weaponization of the justice system, specifically regarding the FISA process. They highlight how the FISA court found that the FBI illegally used FISA 275,000 times against Americans, including cases related to January 6th. The speaker criticizes Congress for reauthorizing FISA and argues that it has been turned inward, targeting Americans and groups associated with January 6th. They suggest that Congress should have implemented reforms to prevent abuse of power. The speaker also criticizes FBI Director Christopher Wray for not effectively addressing the issue and accuses the Republican leadership of rewarding the FBI for breaking the law and interfering in elections, particularly against Donald Trump.

The entire justice enterprise in The United States depends upon an honor system. It depends upon them telling the truth. It depends upon them abiding a promise they made to tell the truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth. And we are long past the days when that oath was backed in most people by a fear of going to hell. And so it turns out it's an honor system. To get information, to be able to find the truth, and the truth is a real thing. There are facts. That honor system has to be enforced with an iron fist so the system will work, so the truth can be found in a reliable way.

We should question our trust in the FBI and DOJ regarding their ability to police themselves under FISA. They have consistently shown over the years that they cannot be trusted. Congress needs to address this issue and stop relying on the surveillance state to fix it, as it has proven ineffective. Trusting these agencies again would be unwise based on their track record.

The Obama administration allegedly spied on the Trump campaign and presidency, misleading the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) to obtain search warrants. The court was not informed that the main evidence was the Trump dossier, which was funded by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic party. The dossier was described as unverified and salacious by FBI Director Comey. The court was also not told that the British spy who wrote part of the dossier was biased against Trump. Additionally, the court was not informed that the FBI fired the source of the dossier for leaking information to the media. The government presented a Yahoo article as corroboration, without disclosing that it was based on the phony dossier. The FISA court approved the warrant multiple times without knowing the full story. FBI and DOJ officials are accused of lying to the court and the American people. The dossier was crucial in obtaining the warrant, and without it, they would not have been able to do so. The Grassley-Graham memo and report further confirmed the deception by the FBI. The search warrant targeted Carter Page, a former Trump campaign volunteer, but it was also used to spy on others in the Trump team. The spying was seen as an attempt to ensure Clinton's victory and as an insurance policy in case Trump won. This is considered a serious violation of the US constitution and an attempt to subvert the will of the American people. Several high-ranking FBI and DOJ officials may face criminal charges for their actions.

John Nance and Hogan DeGidley discuss a recent FBI case and press conference. Patel’s FBI has been extremely transparent, and that transparency will continue to reassure the American people that information regarding this subject will flow as appropriate without jeopardizing the prosecution of the case. A key takeaway is the suggestion that forensic evidence could be the linchpin to identifying the suspect, despite millions of data lines to review; pieces such as DNA or a fingerprint related to the pipe bombs themselves may have been the actual “smoking gun.” There is emphasis on teamwork and the idea that information had been left to collect dust rather than being newly uncovered. AG Merrick Garland’s remarks are cited, highlighting that the evidence leading to the arrest had been sitting at the FBI for years. The FBI, along with US Attorney Piro and prosecutors, worked tirelessly for months sifting through evidence that had been at the FBI with the Biden administration for four years. The point is made that there was no new tip or new witness, just diligent police work and prosecutorial effort. Hogan DeGidley asks why the case wasn’t cracked during President Biden’s four years in office. The response suggests that it either couldn’t be done or wouldn’t be done, and that the American people suffered as a result. It is stated that this did not come from new evidence but from information already in the bureau and departments being sifted through. The discussion frames the case as a win for the administration, the FBI, and the DOJ, and a step toward transparency, accountability, and justice. They note that the attackers placed pipe bombs at both the RNC and DNC locations; the motives remain unknown, and questions about a possible Antifa link or other theories are mentioned as preliminary. Cash Patel is quoted as saying the FBI has committed to being the most transparent law enforcement operation in U.S. history while ensuring accountability in the courts with U.S. Attorneys and prosecutors. The aim is to divulge information when prudent and constitutionally permissible, safeguarding the case, to secure the nation’s capital and allow Americans to live in safe, secure neighborhoods. This is attributed to leadership from the FBI Washington Field Office. John Nance comments that Patel is doing a very good job and that the director’s social-media transparency is notable. He expresses encouragement about the FBI’s reform efforts and notes that the White House press narrative around January 6 is seen as misaligned with the pipe-bomb case. The arrest took place in Woodbridge, Virginia, a wealthy DMV suburb, prompting remarks about why the dots weren’t connected sooner.

There's a clear distinction between legitimate evidence for an investigation and fabricated evidence, as seen in the Russia collusion scandal where the FISA courts were misled. The Biden administration and the DOJ have also engaged in politically motivated actions, such as the indictments and the raid on Mar-a-Lago, which many view as unjust. This politicization of justice is concerning. It's important to acknowledge that many rank-and-file FBI agents are frustrated with the current situation and desire reform. I've been critical of figures like Merrick Garland and Jack Smith throughout this process.

The speaker testifies about the weaponization of the FBI and DOJ against its own employees and the American people. He served in the Army in Iraq and Afghanistan, then as a police officer, and later as an FBI special agent. Despite receiving high performance reviews and being selected for specialized units, he has been smeared as a subpar employee after witnessing weaponization within the FBI. He states that too many in the FBI prioritize avoiding difficulty over upholding the Constitution, leading to an Orwellian atmosphere that silences dissent. He is speaking out despite the potential personal cost, including the loss of his job and family's home. He claims the FBI allowed him to accept orders to a new position, sell his family's home, and report to the new unit before suspending him on his first day, rendering his family homeless. He concludes that bad actors have begun running parts of the government, but he will never stop trying to serve the nation and protect the innocent.

The discussion centers on the Inspector General's (IG) report on the FBI's investigation into the Trump campaign. Speaker 0 claims the report vindicates the FBI from accusations of treason and illegal spying. However, Speaker 1 points out the IG's findings of significant inaccuracies and omissions in the FISA applications, including 17 errors. Speaker 0 admits to being wrong about the FISA process but maintains the Steele dossier was part of a broader mosaic of facts. Speaker 1 counters that the IG found the dossier essential to obtaining the FISA warrant and that the FBI renewed the application multiple times despite knowing the Steele reporting was not credible. Speaker 1 highlights that the CIA informed the FBI about Carter Page's relationship with them, but this information was not shared with the FISA court. Additionally, an FBI lawyer allegedly altered a document to state Page was not a source. Speaker 0 states the IG did not find misconduct by FBI personnel, only mistakes. Speaker 1 notes that the case of Kevin Klein Smith has been referred for criminal investigation. Speaker 0 emphasizes the IG did not find criminal misconduct, political bias, or illegal conduct.