TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
There are some very suspect things about how the Hillary Clinton email investigation was handled. The fact that Loretta Lynch, who was the attorney general at the time, met with Bill Clinton on the tarmac right before Hillary had to speak with the FBI is definitely one of them. Also, Loretta Lynch told Jim Comey to publicly call this a matter, instead of a criminal investigation. These actions downplayed what Hillary Clinton had done while all the drama was being created around Donald Trump and the Russia collusion, which never materialized. What the American people are going to find out about the FBI is astonishing, especially the level of bias.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker advocates creating a twenty-four-seven declassification office in the White House that reports directly to the president and handles incoming from the United States of America. The office would pursue declassification of high-profile documents, stating a desire to obtain JFK files, the 9/11 files, and other materials. The speaker asserts that the deep state primarily uses an illegal application of the classification system to cover up its corruption. They reference the so-called “Lovebirds” texts from FBI and DOJ officials involved in the Russiagate investigation, specifically Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, who allegedly were having an extramarital affair while coordinating support for their stance against Trump. The speaker claims these texts expressed hatred for Trump and discussed creating an “insurance policy” to stop him. According to the speaker, after discovering these texts, the FBI and DOJ redacted them before congressional investigators and members overseeing those agencies for an extended period. The speaker emphasizes that this is one example among broader claims of improper behavior by the agencies. The speaker then notes a recent development: Strzok and Page received a $1,500,000 payout from the Department of Justice to settle a lawsuit over the improper disclosure of their personal text messages on FBI phones. The DOJ allegedly rewarded them, despite claims that they broke the law, violated the chain of command, and weaponized the justice system against a political target they despised. The speaker claims that the text messages were eventually declassified in full when the speaker became deputy director of national intelligence, allowing the world to read them. This, they say, demonstrates the best form of transparency. With this context, the speaker reiterates the rationale for the proposed 24/7 declassification office: to provide direct access to documents, files, and memos rather than regurgitated summaries. They argue that the deep state completed a full circle by rewarding those involved and that this office would enable America to receive the truth. The speaker frames the next step as obtaining the truth for the country, with the office serving as the mechanism to accomplish that objective.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Attorney General Garland was questioned about overruling FBI agents in a raid on ex-President Trump's residence. He stated he approved the decision but did not make it. The senator cited a Washington Post article claiming FBI agents were against the raid. Garland denied discussing this with the White House and faced criticism for FBI leaks distancing themselves from his decisions. Garland deflected the accusations, questioning the motives behind the leaks. Senator Cotton's time for questioning expired. Translation: Attorney General Garland was questioned about his involvement in a raid on ex-President Trump's residence. He approved the decision but did not make it. The senator referenced a Washington Post article claiming FBI agents opposed the raid. Garland denied discussing this with the White House and faced criticism for FBI leaks distancing themselves from his decisions. Garland questioned the motives behind the leaks. Senator Cotton's time for questioning expired.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Attorney General Garland was questioned about an article in the Washington Post stating that FBI officials resisted raiding former President Trump's residence. Garland denied the accuracy of the article and stated that he cannot comment on the investigation. He clarified that he approved the decision to seek a search warrant after probable cause, but did not make the decision himself. The senator insisted that the article be entered into the record, but Garland objected. The senator questioned Garland's leadership based on the FBI agents' reluctance to conduct the raid. Garland responded by mentioning previous claims of leaks favoring the left. The senator's time expired, and the transcript ended.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator Hawley questions Mr. Abadi about the existence of a document that alleges the President has received bribes from a foreign nation. Initially, the FBI director denied its existence, but later acknowledged it after Senator Grassley mentioned reading it. Senator Hawley asks why the document is not being released and if it is classified. Mr. Abadi confirms that the document is unclassified but does not commit to releasing it. Senator Hawley insists that the American people have the right to see it, suggesting that the source's name can be redacted.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1, who was the CFO of Hillary Clinton's campaign, about facilitating payment for the Steele Dossier. Speaker 1 denies any knowledge of it. Speaker 0 brings up John Podesta's involvement and accuses Speaker 1 of being aware of the campaign's payment for the dossier. Speaker 1 maintains that they were not aware. Speaker 0 criticizes Speaker 1 for not holding themselves to the same standard as private sector CFOs. Speaker 1 clarifies that the SEC's focus is on financial accuracy, not campaign payments. The conversation ends with Speaker 0 asking if Speaker 1 accurately paid for the dossier.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Attorney General Garland was questioned about a Washington Post article stating that senior FBI officials resisted conducting a raid on President Trump's residence and wanted to seek his permission instead. Garland clarified that his earlier comment about deferring to FBI agents was in reference to tactics in specific cases. He approved the decision to seek a search warrant after probable cause, overruling the FBI agents who were hesitant. When asked if he discussed this with the White House, Garland stated that the article did not mention such details. The senator requested the article to be entered into the record. The senator then questioned Garland's leadership based on the FBI's lack of confidence. Garland responded by mentioning conflicting claims about FBI leaks. The senator's time expired, and the hearing moved on to the next senator.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Tonight, we're gonna tell you about the other Clinton investigation, running in three FBI offices: New York, Washington, and Little Rock. It was a predicated criminal investigation examining whether Hillary Clinton ran a pay to play scheme that delivered favors from her role as Secretary of State while foreigners and others paid large sums to her family foundation, run by Bill Clinton and Chelsea Clinton. Three separate agencies, three separate bureaus, the FBI believed they had predicated evidence to pursue it, but "every time they tried to move the ball down the road in shadows of the twenty sixteen election, they got shut down at the highest levels of their agency." Andrew McCabe attended the meeting where that assistance was solicited; he was conflicted out, but "not before he gave the order to his agents that you won't investigate or do anything on this unless I approve it." Four US attorney's offices under Barack Obama were asked for help; "All three of those four offices told the agents, you're on your own." Sally Yates explicitly told the FBI, "shut it down." Prosecutors have come forward to cooperate with Pam Bondi and Kash Patel, who found this document. This is the beginning of a "double headed, scandal": first pursuing false allegations against Republicans, then forming a protection racket around Democrats like Hillary Clinton and Biden family and others, Joe Biden himself when it came to classified documents.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions why the FBI paid Christopher Steele $1 million to verify a dossier on Trump and offered $3 million to Twitter to suppress a story on Hunter Biden. They express concern over the FBI's actions being politically motivated. The FBI director responds by explaining the payments to social media companies are for legal process costs. The speaker accuses the FBI of damaging its reputation and questions if the FBI requested financial institutions to provide customer data. The FBI director is unsure and the speaker presents an email from Bank of America as evidence.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
After a 4-year investigation, the justice department released a 300-page report on the FBI's failures. Members of Congress will bring in John Durham to review the findings. The investigation confirms what we already knew from a previous inspector general report: the FBI did not uphold their duty to follow the law in certain events and activities related to the crossfire hurricane and intelligence operations.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
There are more documents to be declassified that will show how sinister the FBI was in amplifying Hillary Clinton's steel dossier as real and credible, and how they buried the counterintelligence referral memo. According to Speaker 1, he and FBI director Patel will be declassifying these additional documents. Speaker 1 stated that there is no Russia collusion hoax file cabinet at the FBI or CIA, and that they have to look for well-hidden documents by tracing through emails and looking for signs and clues. The Trump administration will continue to shed transparency, light, and truth because this was the greatest political scandal of our lifetime. It derailed the country and President Trump's first four years in office, and Donald Trump is committed to making sure it doesn't happen again.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The witness testified that they were at the Justice Department when Bill Barr, who was the attorney general at the time, called Tony Schafer. The call was on speakerphone, and about six or seven other people were able to hear the conversation. Barr was described as irate and told Schafer to stand down on an investigation. Schafer's response was described as sufficiently strong, stating that the evidence had already been found. Barr reiterated his directive to stand down. The conversation was not long but was agitated.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
We reached a settlement to move on from this matter. The president and congress should focus on solving the issues they were elected for. Miss Jones' new counsel met our conditions, including ensuring Hirschfeld's money wasn't involved. The settlement amount is $850,000, distribution details unknown. Miss Jones' legal fees are $3-4 million, not our concern.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1, who was the CFO of Hillary Clinton's campaign, about facilitating payment for the Steele Dossier. Speaker 1 denies knowledge of it. Speaker 0 brings up John Podesta's involvement and accuses Speaker 1 of being aware of the campaign's payment for the dossier. Speaker 1 maintains that they were not aware. Speaker 0 criticizes Speaker 1 for not holding themselves to the same standard as private sector CFOs. Speaker 1 clarifies that the SEC's focus is on financial accuracy, not campaign payments. The conversation ends with Speaker 0 asking if Speaker 1 accurately paid for the dossier.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
These remarks were notable as Crooks reached the final phase of his YouTube commenting, during which a new figure, Willie Tepes, pressured Crooks to embrace violence. Tepes wrote, “if a gun and a badge is all that is needed, then authority obviously comes from the barrel of a gun. We have more guns than they do. There is no way we can avoid a war at this point, so you better just get used to the idea. We have nothing to lose and everything to win. And the alternative, a global police state, is unacceptable.” The identity of Willie Tepes remains unknown; the FBI has not publicly mentioned him, though they are aware he exists. Days after the shooting, someone screenshotted Tepes’ YouTube account page despite him having few followers. The user’s online footprint now appears on a foreign Antifa website linking Tepes to the Nordic Resistance Movement, a group designated a terrorist organization by the US State Department. Crooks’ online footprint abruptly ends after his encounter with Tepes. Regardless of Tepes’ motives or affiliations, Crooks was clearly ripe for recruitment; from early 2019 to mid-2020, his political views evolved and he searched for Trump more than 700 times online, as well as for Jack Ruby, the man who assassinated Lee Harvey Oswald. He submitted queries including “craziest chemical reactions,” “cars running over protesters,” “best places for mass shooting,” “mass shooting El Paso,” “Trump’s civil war,” “Orlando shooting reaction,” “firing an AR-15 as fast as possible,” “fertilizer bomb,” “how to make napalm,” “how to make Molotov cocktail,” “mass shooting Canada,” “Oklahoma bombing,” and “sniper in Dallas shooting.” He also searched for “American Nazi Party,” “German national anthem 1933, 1945,” “Hitler’s speeches with subtitles,” “neo Nazis,” and “why gays need to go.” Thus, a volatile, troubled, possibly mentally ill young man with a long record of espousing violence in public. The FBI clearly knew he existed. At the same time Crooks was making these posts publicly, the FBI was issuing contracts to private sector tech surveillance firms to harness mass data collection tools to monitor social media for people just like Crooks. It is hard to imagine Crooks, posting in his own name, had not been identified and looked at closely by federal law enforcement. The FBI had access to these YouTube comments, and instead of providing valuable insights, they selectively read them to mischaracterize Crooks’ thoughts. Two and a half weeks after the July 30 attack, a source familiar with the investigation told CNN that federal investigators were looking into a YouTube account possibly connected to Crooks that espoused political violence as well as antisemitic and anti-immigration themes. It wasn’t “possibly connected to Thomas Crooks” as the FBI knew it was Crooks’ account; the same day, the FBI’s deputy director made the same dishonest claim before Congress, and the previous week FBI Director Christopher Wray publicly questioned whether Trump was even shot. In February 2025, the New York Post reported that the FBI obstructed efforts to solve why Thomas Matthew Crooks, who left no manifesto, did what he did. The Post said this left local law enforcement, Crooks’ former friends, classmates, and teachers frustrated, and noted that the cremation timing raised concerns. Less than a month after the shooting, Congressman Clay Higgins of Louisiana, a former police officer, investigated in Butler and learned that the FBI released Crooks’ body for cremation ten days after July 13. Higgins reported that the coroner said Crooks’ body would not have been released to the family for cremation or burial without FBI permission. The cremation, the day House Homeland Security and Oversight Committees began investigations, made it impossible for investigators outside the FBI to verify the autopsy report; a new tox screen could not be performed because the body no longer exists.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: "What I'm saying is a reasonable suspicion is that there were agents. There's a video showing a guy with an earpiece pulling people into the building. Alright? Mhmm. You combine that with the evidence of Ray Epps, and it looks like you have a preponderance of evidence suggesting there may have been federal law enforcement involved in making that thing happen." Speaker 1: "I'll get you beyond a reasonable doubt. Two pieces of information. Ray Epps was on FBI's most wanted list one day, and the next day, he was off of the FBI's most wanted list. There are only two ways that happens. You die or your informant." Speaker 1: "Put that aside. Under congressional testimony, Jill Sanborn, who I used to work with, the head of the FBI counterintelligence division in charge of all these investigations, testified under oath when senator Cruz asked her, flat out, were there federal agents involved with January 6? And she said, quote, senator, I can't answer that at this time." Speaker 1: "The reason she said I can't answer that is because of the same stonewalling they gave us during Russergate with Christopher Steelehauper and everybody else. It's the same narrative, and and I'm telling you they were there." Speaker 0: "You're so you're saying that she said I can't answer that because the answer is yes Yeah. And that would compromise whatever their operation was. Exactly."

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2016-2015, FBI officials texted about an "insurance policy" against Trump. No FBI agents expressed disappointment about Trump surviving an assassination attempt. One individual made inappropriate comments and was referred for disciplinary action. The speaker will share any further incidents with the committee.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
"Ultimately, all we can do at the FBI is make sure that we stay focused on doing the work in the right way, following our rules and not letting preferences, partisan or otherwise, drive or taint the approach." "A Trump lawyer certified that all classified papers had been returned to the government, but the FBI said later it found 72 documents marked top secret or secret, at least one about US military strength." "I haven't had any interaction with the Biden White House, about investigations into the former president." "This is a hard job. You're inevitably going to make different people angry, often very powerful people. But part of the essence of the rule of law is to make sure that facts and the law and proper predication drive investigations. Not who's in power, not who wants it to be so or not so"

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator Cotton pressed Attorney General Garland, citing a Washington Post report that 'senior FBI officials who would be in charge of leading the search resisted doing so as too combative' and that 'these field agents wanted to shutter the criminal investigation altogether, but they were overruled by Maine DOJ.' Garland said, 'I've skimmed that article. It is not that's not an accurate reflection of what the article says, and I'm not able to comment on the investigation,' and added, 'What I said was I approved the decision.' Cotton asked if he talked to the White House; Garland replied, 'Washington Post article does not say what you're saying.' The record was entered. Cotton asserted, 'FBI field agents did not wanna conduct the raid and they were overruled by DOJ,' and they discussed leaks, with Garland noting, 'they're leaking left, right, and center and saying it wasn't us.'

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that the FBI settled two lawsuits, agreeing to give Peter Strzok $1,200,000 and Lisa Page $800,000. The other speaker believes the Department of Justice was involved, not the FBI, but will confirm if the FBI had to sign off on the settlement. The speaker references Lisa Page saying to Peter Strzok, "Trump's not ever going to become president," to which Strzok replied, "No. He won't. We will stop it." The speaker wants to know if the FBI signed off on the settlement and who signed off on it. The speaker asks if the other speaker or Chris Ray signed off on it. The speaker states that Merrick Garland must have agreed to the settlement. The other speaker will direct the Department of Justice to answer these questions.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Republican senator Ron Johnson's committee released an interim report including FBI text messages that draw connections to President Obama. FBI agent Peter Strzok texts FBI lawyer Lisa Page, asking about talking points for Director Comey. Page replies that POTUS wants to know everything they are doing. The report notes that Strzok and others watered down language a week before Comey publicly closed the case. Strzok writes that his boss, Bill Priestap, changed "president" to "another senior government official." In November, Page writes, "I bottled the president's men. Figure I needed to brush up on Watergate." The next day, Page writes that being there makes her angry because of "highfalutin national security talk," while they have their task ahead of them. Senate investigators question a connection to an August text where the two discuss an "insurance policy."

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
During closed-door testimony, former FBI lawyer Lisa Page stated that the Obama administration's Justice Department advised the FBI against pursuing the gross negligence statute regarding Hillary Clinton's handling of classified information. This testimony seemingly contradicts James Comey's 2016 recommendation against criminal charges. According to released transcripts, there were concerns about charging Clinton initially. However, under Loretta Lynch's leadership, it became clear that charges wouldn't be pursued. A chart by federal investigators listed possible statutes, but next to gross negligence was a note that the DOJ was "not willing to charge this," except in military cases where information was lost. President Trump tweeted that the transcripts show the Obama Justice Department was "a broken and corrupt machine." Page's testimony also confirmed that Russian collusion was unproven when Robert Mueller was appointed.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator Chuck Grassley alleged on the Senate floor that there are 17 recordings of an informant from Burisma, a Ukrainian natural gas company. He claimed that 15 of these recordings are of the informant talking to Hunter Biden, while 2 are of him talking to Joe Biden. When questioned, the FBI representative refused to comment on the recordings. Senator Grassley accused the FBI of damaging the institution by not disclosing whether there is credible evidence of the president taking a $5,000,000 bribe. He also criticized the lack of hearings on these allegations and accused the FBI of stonewalling. The FBI representative maintained that they are operating within their parameters and denied stonewalling. Senator Grassley concluded by stating that the FBI believes it is unaccountable to Congress and the American people.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
A senator questions Deputy Director Abadi about allegations of a $5 million bribery scheme involving President Biden and his family. Abadi refuses to comment on the existence of a report or 17 voice recordings related to the allegations. The senator accuses the FBI of stonewalling and damaging its reputation. Abadi maintains that they operate within established parameters and will work with the committee to provide information. The senator criticizes the FBI for not being accountable and demands the release of the report and recordings. Abadi avoids directly answering questions about the investigation and the informant's reliability. The senator expresses concern that the evidence is being covered up by Democrats and the media. The exchange becomes heated and ends with the senator calling Abadi's behavior disgraceful.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion centers on the Inspector General's (IG) report on the FBI's investigation into the Trump campaign. Speaker 0 claims the report vindicates the FBI from accusations of treason and illegal spying. However, Speaker 1 points out the IG's findings of significant inaccuracies and omissions in the FISA applications, including 17 errors. Speaker 0 admits to being wrong about the FISA process but maintains the Steele dossier was part of a broader mosaic of facts. Speaker 1 counters that the IG found the dossier essential to obtaining the FISA warrant and that the FBI renewed the application multiple times despite knowing the Steele reporting was not credible. Speaker 1 highlights that the CIA informed the FBI about Carter Page's relationship with them, but this information was not shared with the FISA court. Additionally, an FBI lawyer allegedly altered a document to state Page was not a source. Speaker 0 states the IG did not find misconduct by FBI personnel, only mistakes. Speaker 1 notes that the case of Kevin Klein Smith has been referred for criminal investigation. Speaker 0 emphasizes the IG did not find criminal misconduct, political bias, or illegal conduct.
View Full Interactive Feed