reSee.it - Related Video Feed

We're seeing more close calls between planes on the runway, so the FAA held a summit to address it. They're calling it a safety call to action because, despite the US airline industry being extremely safe, there are major warning signs of serious breakdowns. The NTSB is investigating six incidents since January and says talking isn't enough. They've issued seven recommendations on runway collisions, some of which haven't been acted upon for over 20 years. Air traffic controllers are critically short-staffed, with 1,200 fewer certified professionals than ten years ago. One pilot and former FAA safety team representative thinks the summit was more about PR than substance. It seemed like they wanted to make everyone think that they're doing something, but it is not clear that much came out of the meeting.

Over the past 3 years, Representative questioned FBI Director Wray and Attorney General Garland about federal assets at the Capitol on January 6th, but received no answers. The Inspector General announced a review of the DOJ response in 2021, paused it due to ongoing criminal cases, and reinitiated it last year. The report will include information on the number of confidential human sources operating on Capitol grounds on January 6th, but the exact number is not available yet due to the draft form and classification review. The report's release is not expected before the election, and possibly not before the next inauguration. The report will expose the presence of confidential human sources at the Capitol, and whether DOJ CHS protocols were followed. Representative inquired about the failed FBI investigation of the January 6th pipe bomb, citing lost information, deleted Secret Service texts, and corrupted cell phone data. The FBI allegedly lacks video footage of the DNC from January 6th. The Inspector General couldn't rule out the involvement of confidential human sources in the pipe bomb incident.

Hello, everyone. Thank you for being here. We're addressing the issues in North Carolina from the hurricane that struck nearly four months ago. It's been mishandled, and we aim to fix it. After that, we'll head to Los Angeles to assess a fire situation that could have been managed better with proper water flow. Some of you may join us on the plane. There's uncertainty about who will be traveling with us, but I hope everyone makes it. I was surprised by Collins and Murkowski's decisions, and Mitch seems to always be a no vote. Today is a bit cold, but it's a beautiful day. We’ll be monitoring the situation closely, and I’m confident in our representation. We’ll also discuss tax breaks for Italy soon.

It's January 29th, just nine days before a presidential transition. The FAA administrator has resigned, leaving no confirmed replacement. This period will involve significant public communication and investigations into recent events. What do you expect the implications of this transition will be for today's actions and the upcoming days as we uncover what occurred?

The speaker states they want to clarify whether an offer was made to Joe Biden and Kamala Harris to send a rocket to rescue astronauts sooner. According to the speaker, SpaceX offered to return astronauts earlier, even though they were only supposed to be in space for eight days but have been there for almost ten months. The speaker claims SpaceX could have brought the astronauts back after a few months, but the offer was made to the Biden administration and rejected for political reasons.

It's been two weeks since everything changed. I lost my job last night – a devastating blow after seven years as a shift lead on a project studying the wheels on the bus. Elon Musk's actions with USAID have had real consequences for me and my family. I'm unemployed, and I don't know what to tell my kids. This isn't a joke; it's affecting real people. The worst part? We may never know if the wheels on the bus go round and round, and nobody seems to care. This situation is incredibly serious and deeply upsetting.

The speaker thanks supporters for sharing a video that went viral, leading to support from congressmen and private sector helicopter assistance. Civilian helicopters are actively flying rescue missions. Government military support is reportedly en route. Flights are typically delayed until 9:30 or 10 AM due to fog, but a temporary flight restriction (TFR) due to Joe Biden's visit is further impeding rescue efforts. Search and rescue teams are being deployed to the mountains via helicopter before the TFR goes into effect. The helicopters must then travel to another airport to obtain a special code allowing them to fly during the TFR. No rescue missions will occur between approximately 12 PM and 4 PM due to the TFR. If the TFR is lifted around 4 PM as scheduled, only two rescue missions will likely be possible before nightfall. The speaker suggests that political considerations are hindering rescue operations during favorable weather conditions.

Have you ever flown a plane? No. Were you a military or commercial pilot? No. Have you worked for an airline or as an air traffic controller? No. Have you worked for a company that manufactures or repairs airplanes? No. The FAA administrator role requires specialized knowledge, which I lack. I have no experience in aviation safety, and it would be unwise to put me in charge. The public expects an FAA administrator to understand aviation safety, especially after incidents like the near collision at Austin's airport. It’s concerning that someone without aviation safety experience could be in such a critical position.

Bob: Madame Ambassador, he says that this is something that has been in the planning stages for months. I understand you have been saying that you think it was spontaneous. Are we not on the same page here? Madame Ambassador: Well, Bob, let me tell you what we understand to be the assessment at present. First of all, very importantly, as you discussed with the president, there is an investigation that the United States government will launch led by the FBI that has begun. Bob: But they are not there. Madame Ambassador: They are not on the ground yet, but they already begun looking at all sorts of evidence of various sorts already available to them and to us, and they will get on the ground and continue the investigation. So we'll want to see the results of that investigation to draw any definitive conclusions. But based on the best information we have to date, what our assessment is as of the present is, in fact, what began spontaneously in Benghazi as a reaction to what transpired some hours earlier in Cairo, where, of course, as you know, there was a violent protest outside of our embassy sparked by this hateful video. But soon after that spontaneous protest began outside of our consulate in Benghazi, we believe that it looks like extremist elements, individuals joined in that effort with heavy weapons of the sort that are unfortunately readily now available in Libya post revolution, and that it spun from there into something much, much more violent. Bob: But you do not agree with him that this was something that had been plotted out We several months do Madame Ambassador: not have information at present that leads us to conclude that this was premeditated or preplanned.

The conversation centers on the Epstein file controversy, the DOJ's handling of it, and what the speakers see as systemic failures and political risk for Donald Trump and allied figures. - The Epstein/file issue is framed as predictable and frustrating. Alex Jones notes a “slow drip of nothing” and calls the initial promise of full file disclosure a pattern of “promise something, deliver nothing.” Pam Bondi’s statement that “the files were on my desk” is discussed as an apparent misstep or staged moment, but the core point is that large amounts of material are not being released despite public promises. - The discourse questions where the files actually reside and who controls access. The claim that a “truckload of files” existed and was hidden at DOJ is rejected as a mischaracterization; the speakers emphasize that the FBI and DOJ have files, but access and disclosure have been hampered by internal political dynamics. They highlight the tension between the Southern District of New York and the DOJ, noting that SDNY answers to the DOJ and the Attorney General, thereby questioning the premise that one regional office is independently sabotaging access. - There is a persistent critique of DOJ leadership and governance. The argument is that DOJ has not been “rooted out of corruption,” with mid-level and high-level managers and appointees still in place, propagating practices that the speakers deem contrary to transparency and accountability. They point to supposed failures by individuals such as Cash Patel and Pam Bondi in relying on FBI briefings rather than verifiable records, suggesting that power in intelligence agencies is still too dependent on information control. - The Epstein files are treated as emblematic of a broader issue: a two-tier or selective justice system. The speakers argue that there’s a pattern whereby powerful individuals have access to information and protection, while the public lacks full visibility. They mention that Trump’s response and the way the files have been handled have become a larger “Russiagate-like” narrative, with Epstein serving as a lightning rod for accusations of corruption and cover-up. - The political dynamic is central. Several participants emphasize that Trump’s stance and the responses of his allies are under intense scrutiny. They discuss the risk that Trump’s association with the Epstein disclosures could become a political liability if the files aren’t released. Marjorie Taylor Greene and Tom Massey are mentioned as consistent voices pushing for full disclosure, while Roger Stone’s warnings about CIA and foreign involvement in the Epstein nexus are cited as supporting the view that a larger, international financial/transnational network may be implicated. - There is criticism of how the media and political opponents handle the issue. The speakers claim Democrats are using hearings to turn the Epstein matter into a broader political weapon and to portray Trump as obstructive or complicit, regardless of the factual state of file disclosure. They argue that the public is being led by a PR war, with “photoshopped” or redacted material used to frame narratives rather than to reveal truth. - The discussion turns toward accountability and remedies. The speakers insist that federal law requires the release of the Epstein files by a deadline, and that failing to comply constitutes a constitutional or institutional crisis. They argue that Congress lacks direct enforcement power and must consider funding or other leverage to compel compliance, noting the apparent reluctance of Congress to act decisively. - There are predictions about personnel changes and institutional reform. Dan Bongino is discussed as likely to depart from his DOJ-related role, with Todd Blanche as the lead prosecutor taking heat for not meeting deadlines. Andrew Bailey is floated as a potential replacement. The broader implication is that there will be a shake-up in DOJ and possibly FBI leadership in the near term, though the speakers acknowledge uncertainty about how far reforms will go or whether entrenched interests will impede real change. - The Epstein matter is used to illustrate how compromises and cover-ups operate across power structures. The speakers argue that the problem isn’t just the existence of the files but how the system treats those files—how access is controlled, how redactions are justified, and how political narratives are constructed around high-profile investigations. Harmony Dillon and Liz Harrington are cited as voices who underscore the need for mid-level reform and more transparency, suggesting that the deepest issues lie in organizational culture and incentives rather than in isolated acts by a few individuals. - A broader reflection on American governance finishes the discussion. The speakers warn that a failure to release the Epstein files or to purge corrupt practices could deepen distrust in federal institutions and threaten the legitimacy of the government. They suggest that if reform stalls, the country might devolve into a state-by-state dynamic or other less cohesive arrangements, as confidence in a functioning central government erodes. In summary, the transcript frames the Epstein file disclosures as a litmus test for DOJ integrity and political accountability. It portrays a pattern of delayed or selective disclosure, questions about who controls information within the FBI/DOJ, and a risk that political calculations are interfering with lawful obligations. It also foresees significant leadership changes and intensified scrutiny of the department in the near future, with Epstein serving as a focal point for broader critiques of how power and information are managed in the United States.

We've recovered the black boxes from the passenger plane and the military helicopter involved in the collision at the Washington airport. The military helicopter was also equipped with some form of recording devices, and those will be read either by DOD or by us. We have agreements to share data on those recorders. The crash killed all 67 people onboard the two aircrafts, making it the deadliest US air disaster in over two decades. The cause remains unclear. Forty bodies have been recovered from the Potomac River. The black box flight recorders from the passenger plane were also recovered and are being examined. Investigators have pledged to release a preliminary report within thirty days.

The plane is landing. A person asks if the president plans to take Greenland by force and about the impact of today's inflation report. Someone says they don't want to see anyone get hurt. Another person wishes the president good luck and tells him to be careful.

Documents will be released shortly, following last week's release. The speaker is encouraged by intelligence community whistleblowers coming forward, who were disgusted by past events and hope the truth will come out. The most important thing is accountability for the American people. All current and future documents have been sent to the Department of Justice to ensure the integrity of the democratic republic. The goal is to ensure Americans have faith that their votes will be respected by those leaving power.

Speaker 0: There have been briefings to Congress that lead us to believe there is definitely an advanced technology out there that's not created by mankind. Speaker 1: About a decade ago I revealed on Joe Rogan that from my research in the Global Sun Admissions, aliens don’t come from distant star systems—they come interdimensionally. We have limited sight across our normal light spectrum and into other dimensions. I’ve spoken to high-level Pentagon people, CIA, scientists, physicists, who’ve said it’s an interdimensional invasion. The Bible and other ancient religions reference an unseen presence entering our universe, our domain, our dimension. There’s a clip of her on Fox News Friday night saying it’s interdimensional, but classified. A craft will show up 100 miles away instantly or fly Mach 20 and make a perfect turn—things that would crush solid stainless steel due to gravity. So we know they’re interdimensionally jumping. Now Trump talks about a big reveal; Obama says aliens are real. This isn’t just about UFOs—it's part of a broader awakening. It’s a distraction from Epstein, perhaps, but Trump said after reelection he’d disclose, and there’s a report due. Disclosure is happening on many fronts. We’re focused on UFOs and extraterrestrials, not taking away from exposing Epstein. There’s a lot of disclosure and crazy stuff happening on every front. Speaker 2: He (the other speaker) gave classified information and wasn’t supposed to. Speaker 1: Aliens are real? He gave classified information, whether they’re real or not. Speaker 3: Hours later, the president posted on Truth Social directing the release of government files related to alien and extraterrestrial life and UFOs. We bring in Florida Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna, chair of the Oversight Committee Task Force on declassification of federal secrets. She has said there is evidence of interdimensional beings that can operate through the time spaces we have. You told Joe Rogan you’ve viewed evidence of interdimensional beings on Earth that operate through time spaces—can you explain? Speaker 0: Yes. In classified briefings we’ve seen evidence suggesting advanced technology not created by mankind. There are videos, including one where a UAP deflects a Hellfire missile, taken from ISR footage off the coast of Yemen. Some physics defy explanation; not the only government to examine this. I view it through national security: are these technologies adversarial weapons or not? The federal government denying access to Congress is alarming in a free society. We expect the American people to decide after reviewing the evidence. Gates has said that if you’ve seen what we’ve seen, you’ll believe it too. Speaker 3: So you’re saying the Air Force has covered up UAP sightings? Is it because we or others have advanced technology, or because a foreign actor has abilities beyond our understanding? Speaker 0: Based on our interviews and testimony, we have reason to believe this tech is not created by mankind. It’s possible there are advanced US weapons denied access to the public. Unelected bureaucrats denying access to Congress is problematic, and there have been whistleblower threats and even deaths discussed in testimony. There’s bipartisan momentum toward disclosure, and we’ll continue to explore with the American people. President Obama’s remarks and Trump’s anticipated declassification are fueling this process. Speaker 1: The elite seek transcendence and to know the secrets of the universe; some are good, some bad, some mixed. Einstein and Planck suggest multiple dimensions; top scientists and billionaires are now speaking of a false hologram, artificial constraints, and gravity bleeding into this universe, with dark matter as a sign of something deeper. Some say we’re in a computer-generated projection, a thought or dream in a programmer’s mind. There’s talk of a sub-transmission zone below the third dimension fighting to ascend. Some believe humanity is at a fifth or sixth dimension intellectually, while a war rages to determine whether humanity will advance or be controlled by a breakaway civilization merging with machines. Google and others allegedly contemplated building a giant artificial system—a hive-mind AI connected to billions of people—that could predict and influence the future, potentially erasing individual free will. A counterstrike is underway to block such systems and promote genuine debate about humanity’s path, including addressing alleged pedophiles and “psychic vampires” in control of AI before humanity is harmed. The interdimensional force behind these developments is said to grant advanced knowledge to certain groups, sometimes described in religious terms as Satan. There’s more to come as disclosures unfold, including anticipated declassification next week when Trump allegedly releases UFO files. Speaker 3: We’ll be watching and covering it next week as disclosure unfolds.

It's January 29th, just nine days before a presidential transition. The FAA administrator has resigned, leaving the position unfilled. This period will involve significant public communication and investigations into recent events. What do you expect the transition will mean for the upcoming days as we learn more about what happened?

The loss of life is the primary concern. The president's remarks about DEI hiring policies have raised questions. The Biden administration's FAA policy prioritized hiring individuals with disabilities, which some argue may have led to staffing issues. There are claims that DEI initiatives have lowered standards across various sectors. However, no specific cases were provided where DEI hiring expedited the training of air traffic controllers. The discussion also touched on the need for thorough investigations into the accident, including potential pilot error. Families deserve transparency about the investigation's progress, and broader issues beyond this incident will be examined.

I lost my job last night, just two weeks after the recent changes initiated by Elon Musk regarding USAID. I've been a shift lead on a project for seven years, and now I'm unemployed. This situation has serious consequences for real people like me. I’m left wondering how to explain this to my family and kids. The impact of these decisions is not just theoretical; it affects lives. What if we never find out if the wheels on the bus go round and round? Does anyone care about the real implications of these changes?

Speaker 0: We have a problem with the CIA and FBI in Washington. Speaker 1: What's your plan to start over and fix them? Speaker 0: They've gotten out of control, with weaponization and other issues. The people need to bring about change. We were making progress, but more needs to be done.

Well, folks, it's been quite a weekend. I received a call from the president, and after speaking with the attorney general and FBI Director Patel, I've been offered the role of deputy director at the FBI. It's an honor, and I've accepted the position. This means I'll be stepping away from the show, which is a lot to walk away from, but I'll share what I can about the situation. I'll also discuss the future of the show today. I'm going to play a speech I gave eleven years ago so you can understand why I made this decision. I hope you, the Bongino army, understand that I couldn't disclose this information earlier out of respect for the president, the attorney general, and the FBI director. Thank you for your support.

I want to emphasize that the recent aviation incidents will likely raise concerns about FAA and air traffic control staffing. Even though a recent incident occurred in a Canadian air traffic control tower, the discussion about potential staff cuts at the FAA, under the previous administration, is relevant. The FAA has been expressing concerns about being understaffed in critical positions, particularly air traffic control, for years. While air traffic control may not be affected by staff cuts so far, other positions related to maintaining critical equipment may have been cut. All of these recent incidents will feed into concerns about the safety of the air traffic system going forward, at least on this side of the border.