reSee.it - Related Video Feed

An illegal immigrant, El Mano Negro, admitted to assassinating over 25 people in the county for a cartel that was dismantled. Members of the cartel admitted that moving human beings, drugs, guns, and fentanyl is easier now than ever before in the cartel's history. According to the speaker, law enforcement resources are quickly depleted because of the Biden and Harris administration. The speaker stated that law enforcement sees victim after victim, and these stories are not unfamiliar to law enforcement throughout California.

The speaker questions Miss Cheadle about security measures at an event. Miss Cheadle refuses to provide specific names or details. The speaker criticizes her lack of preparedness and questions why a potential threat was not neutralized sooner. Miss Cheadle states they are investigating the incident. The speaker demands her resignation, suggesting a possible conspiracy. Miss Cheadle does not provide a direct answer and is urged to resign before leaving.

The speaker demands the resignation of the director of the Secret Service due to security failures during an event where President Trump was shot. Questions are raised about why the threat was not neutralized sooner, despite warnings from the crowd. The director is pressed on whether there was a stand-down order or conspiracy. The director states an investigation is ongoing, but the speaker insists on her resignation.

Speaker 0: It was January 2022 when a colleague of mine in the unit came to me saying, something's up. We've had a doubling or tripling of baby deaths in the last year. And that's what got my curiosity piqued. Speaker 1: Their own government told us a medical treatment was safe, and it killed babies. Speaker 2: I have lost all faith that Health Canada is looking out genuine for the best interests of Canadians. Speaker 3: Doctors made extra money to push vaccines and they were given a billing code to do it. I have pulled all the billing codes. Speaker 2: They've purchased the vaccine that hasn't been approved. They've distributed it to the province so the second it's approved, we can start jabbing ourselves with it. We can start jabbing pregnant mothers with it. Speaker 4: Why did we have to get these vaccinations? Like, why was this something that we had to do? You go to the hospital, you expect to have a baby, and you expect to go home, And then you don't. Speaker 0: I was suspect that there was criminal negligence on part of the government and the public health officials. Possible. They pushed on with this narrative to everybody, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, that the mRNA shots were safe and effective. Speaker 2: They had wiretapped her phone. They had harassed her. They had charged her. They didn't allow any expert witnesses to testify. Speaker 1: Our Canadian babies died, and the police are trying to cover it up to the point of stopping detective Helen Greaves from testifying about it. Speaker 2: The dominant individuals keep the subordinates in their place by constant aggression. Speaker 4: If you don't want to get vaccinated, that's your choice. But don't think you can get on a plane or a train besides vaccinated people and put them at risk. Speaker 2: It started off with CBC running a story to implicate her and to paint her with a brush that looks uncomplimentary to the public. Speaker 5: Canada has to shift their understanding of what the CBC is. It is a state broadcaster pushing the agenda of the Liberal government of Canada. Speaker 2: This is the most significant matter affecting our children today from a health perspective, and they're still not investigating. Everything emanates outward from this case involving law enforcement, the judicial system, the pharmaceutical industry, our health agencies, how they work together, how they censored information. It all ties together to this one case, and that's what makes it so dangerous.

"These people are directly being taught by USX military." "They got Pegasus from Israel." "She wants Mexico to stay Mexico. She doesn't wanna see American forces coming in." "A 100%." "Does she have narcoties? 100%. 100%." "I believe she definitely has narcoties." "She's with the Morena Party. So many political figures in this party have now, just recently, been sanctioned by The US, had their visas revoked by The US, have been tied to shell companies in The US that are cleaning money for the cartels." "This was the most violent Mexican election in the history of Mexican elections." "And then prior to her, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, the previous president of Mexico, who basically took Sheehanbaum and put her up and said, everyone who voted for me, for her, and she won by a landslide." "He had been reported to have received a significant multimillion dollar payout from the Sinaloa cartel." "If she really cared about the Mexican people, the cartel crackdown would be to the next level." "I published that list. And then exactly a month later, Marina del Pilar, her US tourist visa and her husband's were revoked."

The speaker is part of a senate bipartisan investigation into an assassination attempt. According to the speaker, the Secret Service and FBI are dragging their feet and not providing requested documents, such as 302s and interview transcriptions. Documents that are provided are heavily redacted and delivered the day of the interview, making them unusable. The speaker believes this behavior is suspicious and fuels conspiracy theories. They claim releasing the body for cremation before autopsy or toxicology reports further drives suspicion and conspiracy theories.

I talk about my uncle's assassination and my belief that intelligence agencies were involved. Despite being aware of the danger, I don't live in fear but take precautions to protect myself.

Speaker 0 expresses concern about the administration’s response to the incident, noting that very quickly, very high up people, including Christine Ohm, Donald Trump himself, and Shady Vance, started calling the killed woman a domestic terrorist and saying she deserved it. The speaker argues that when a relatively young mother of three is killed by a law enforcement officer, government officials should say this was a tragedy, that they will conduct an investigation, and they will see what happened, instead of “running cover for the officer,” because such conduct erodes public trust. The speaker emphasizes that many things about the response freaked people out and describes it as disturbing to have people calling the woman a domestic terrorist. The question is raised: “What the fuck does that even mean?” The speaker notes that even if she did try to run the officer over, it’s not terrorism, and questions what people are talking about when they use that label. There is a critique of how words like “terrorist” are used loosely and how they have “lost meaning,” with the speaker asserting that this is the kind of rhetoric that is used to paint people in certain ways. The speaker draws a comparison, suggesting that labeling someone a terrorist resembles tactics used against Palestinians, where everyone is painted as a terrorist. The rapid labeling is described as part of a broader pattern of invoking terrorism to justify actions or narratives. The speaker concludes with a conditional reflection: if someone is a terrorist, then “actually anything goes,” signaling a perception that the label is being used to bypass normal standards or accountability.

The Deputy Minister of Security, Dr. Julissa Villanueva, revealed that the police used their weapons and ammunition in the massacre at the women's penitentiary. Human rights organizations and prisoners are demanding a new investigation based on her statements. The Public Ministry has been working on the case since the tragedy occurred, and they have not stopped their investigation. The police released a statement denying the allegations and stating that their investigations are conducted in accordance with the law. The director of the Association of Families and Prisoners of Liberty also shared her experiences from the day of the massacre. The investigation is ongoing, and various testimonies and evidence will be presented to the court for further examination.

Carmela is asked if she has anything to say to the victims' families. She is then questioned about why she was armed at school and asked to explain how it was self-defense.

The Justice Department is vital to democracy, ensuring investigations are fair and free from political influence. Protecting sensitive investigations is crucial. Despite attacks, we remain committed to following the law. The pace of justice system trials is out of our control. Thank you, everyone.

The speaker questions the lack of immediate action by law enforcement in response to threats. They suggest negligence or intentional failure in security measures, prompting the need for a thorough investigation. The speaker emphasizes the importance of transparency and accountability in ensuring the safety of public officials. They advocate for a comprehensive inquiry before making any accusations.

Bensouda, former chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and currently Gambia’s High Commissioner to the UK, described 17 years at the ICC, including eight years as deputy prosecutor and nine years as chief prosecutor, during which she faced intimidation, pressure, and threats related to the ICC’s investigations into war crimes, genocide, crimes against humanity, and the crime of aggression. She said this work “triggers pushback” against the court. She stated that in 2015, after opening an examination into Palestine, she began receiving threats involving both herself and her family. She described an early incident in The Hague when she was still living there: two men visited her house in a car parked not next to the residence. She said she did not know where they were from. The driver took the car’s number plate, and she eventually came out while the men stood outside and did not enter. She said they handed her an envelope containing about $500 and told her it was from someone she had helped, which she interpreted as showing they knew where she lived. She reported the incident to ICC security and to the registrar, returned the money, and submitted the number plate. She said the only established detail was that the phone numbers provided were from Israel. She also said Dutch authorities did not do more investigation “as far as I know.” She said Israel made her feel insecure and that this was the first clear Israeli attempt she knew of to persuade her to stop the Palestine investigations. She referenced other security-related incidents around the time, including someone caught near her house taking photos, and the broader context that she had also requested investigations into the US military regarding Afghanistan war crimes, and that Kenya and Côte d’Ivoire cases were still ongoing. Bensouda said she later met Yossi Cohen, the head of Mossad at the time. She described meeting him first in Munich and again in a hotel in New York during the UN General Assembly period, where she was meeting a head of state. She said Cohen approached and the meeting concerned the Palestine investigations. She said Cohen indicated that they did not want the Palestine investigations to continue and that she should stop. She portrayed the progression of the message as initially friendly and attempts to win her over, then increasingly direct: she said Cohen repeatedly insisted that she stop the investigations and that this was the “bottom line.” She said she responded by keeping it quiet and reporting to ICC security and informing Dutch authorities, while avoiding alarming general ICC staff to prevent panic and protect the work. She said she was not aware of extra support from the Dutch government beyond reporting. She also said some authorities urged her to stop because she could be harmed or killed, but she said stopping was “out of the question” to her. She argued that state parties established the ICC have a responsibility to protect and insulate the court from attacks and to ensure personnel feel protected, but that they were not doing enough, and that justice was being sacrificed to political interests. Bensouda said that in 2019 she announced the investigation in the Palestine case and that soon afterward the United States imposed stiff sanctions. She said the sanctions affected her daily life beyond travel, including blocking her bank account at the UN Federal Credit Union and disrupting simple transactions such as booking hotels and transferring money. She said the ICC registrar, working with Dutch authorities, managed for banks to accept to receive her salary, but she said other banks associated with her, including her mortgage bank, closed down. She also said her son’s account in the Gambia was blocked, and that efforts were made to investigate her husband through photographs and audio recordings to determine whether he was involved in anything illegal. She said the threats and sanctions had an impact on the ICC’s work, noting that even measures taken to keep cases moving cannot fully prevent disruption. She concluded that states should come together with structures that act immediately when attacks happen, instead of waiting and scrambling afterward, and that they do not speak with “the same voice,” with some states refusing to help.

In January 2022, a colleague alerted Speaker 0 that there had been a doubling or tripling of baby deaths in the last year, which sparked curiosity. Speaker 1 states that “Their own government told us a medical treatment was safe, and it killed babies.” Speaker 2 says she has “lost all faith that Health Canada is looking out genuinely for the best interests of Canadians.” Speaker 3 alleges that doctors “made extra money to push vaccines” and were given a billing code to do it, and that she has “pulled all the billing codes.” Speaker 4 asserts that “They've purchased the vaccine that hasn't been approved,” distributed it to the provinces so that once it’s approved, they can “start jabbing ourselves with it” and “start jabbing pregnant mothers with it.” Speaker 3 questions the necessity of vaccinations: “Why did we have to get these vaccinations? Like, why was this something that we had to do? You go to the hospital, you expect to have a baby, and you expect to go home, and then you don't.” Speaker 0 speculates on criminal negligence, saying, “I would suspect that there was criminal negligence on part of the government and the public health officials.” Speaker 3 notes that it is “highly recommended that pregnant women get their vaccine as soon as possible.” Speaker 0 contends that a narrative was pushed to everybody, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, that the mRNA shots were safe and effective. Speaker 2 claims wiretapping, harassment, charging, and barring expert witnesses: “They had wiretapped her phone. They had harassed her. They had charged her. They didn't allow any expert witnesses to testify.” Speaker 1 accuses police of trying to cover up Canadian babies’ deaths “to the point of stopping detective Helen Greaves from testifying about it.” Speaker 4 observes that “The dominant individuals keep the subordinates in their place by constant aggression.” Speaker 5 discusses vaccination choice versus public risk, remarking, “If you don't wanna get vaccinated, that's your choice. But don't think you can get on a plane or a train besides vaccinated people and put them at risk,” and claims CBC initially “started off with CBC running a story to implicate her and to paint her with a brush that looks uncomplimentary to the public.” Speaker 6 claims Canada must shift its understanding of what the is, describing it as “a state broadcaster pushing the agenda of the Liberal government of Canada.” Speaker 4 calls this “the most significant matter affecting our children today from a health perspective,” noting that authorities are “not investigating.” Speaker 2 concludes that everything emanates outward from this case involving law enforcement, the judicial system, the pharmaceutical industry, and health agencies, “how they work together, how they censored information. It all ties together to this one case, and that's what makes it so dangerous.”

I investigated and provided supplies to women before and after the massacre. The question is, what is the massacre? The custody of prisoners is the responsibility of the state, and there can be opposing groups. The director of the Ilama center was applauded by everyone, including the military. The police mishandled the prisons, and the sub-secretary had a bad experience in two months due to work sabotage. This led to the events in the prisons, which could have been prevented.

The government of Peru is against the finding of bodies, claiming they are fake. They are now trying to confiscate the bodies, causing confusion and suspicion. The speaker did not expect this to happen and questions why the police are involved if it's not important. The attention on the investigation has now increased, leading people to question the motives behind the government's actions.

Speaker 1 notes that there are thousands of ongoing investigations and prosecutions in the country, and that some involve people and entities the president has previously criticized and believes should be investigated. He says this is not pressure and will not keep him up at night, except to ensure every case is investigated to the fullest extent of the law using all available resources. Regarding weaponization, he argues that it has become a contested word, but says it means nothing to him because it is “completely false.” He contends that for four years, some in the room witnessed weaponization of the department like never before, with a president indicted four times by the department, and with the department assisting two local district attorneys in going after the president. He also asserts the department stood idly by while states tried to keep President Trump off the ballot. He emphasizes that the past four years saw this pattern, and insists that today’s department is changing, not pursuing political enemies but pursuing justice as the president has repeatedly said he wants. He acknowledges the ongoing media narrative about weaponization but rejects it, stating it happens not to be true. He emphasizes that tens of thousands of prosecutors across the country are putting bad guys in jail, something that, in his view, did not happen as it should have in the past four years. He concludes by reiterating his commitment to continue this work, saying it will happen tomorrow and in the coming days.

Carmela is asked if she has anything to say to the victim's family. She is questioned about why she was armed and present at the school. She is asked to explain her self-defense and how her actions constitute self-defense.

The subsecretary of security in Honduras revealed that the ammunition found in the Támara prison, which led to the massacre of women, belonged to the national police. This is a serious matter as it raises questions about why police ammunition was used in the crime. The number of women killed was forty-six. The evidence, including different types of firearms and ammunition, points to the involvement of the national police. However, there are also weapons from other countries involved. This information is crucial and needs further investigation.

But one thing is clear: the Secretariat does not want to expose in any way those who arrange such provocations. And, by the way, as for Mr. Gutierrez, I've been asking him one question for the third year in a row, okay. You probably can't get access to the investigation. But can I ask you to use your authority, Mr? Secretary General, to get a list of those people whose corpses were shown in this city of Bucha on the Central Street. Moreover, a group of BBC correspondents, who unexpectedly found themselves there showed these corpses. I addressed Mr. Gutierrez both personally and publicly, by the way, at a security meeting, but he shyly averts his eyes. I think this is a disgrace for the Secretary General and for the entire Secretariat.

Senator Alex Padilla stated he has questions for the secretary regarding violent criminals. Another speaker is concerned about ICE agents being targeted and doxxed for doing their job. They specifically asked how many ICE agents have been doxxed.

Carmela is asked what she would like to say to the victims and the family of the victims. She is then asked why she was armed and to explain her self-defense, with the speaker questioning how it constitutes self-defense.

Carmela is asked what she would like to say to the victims' families. She is then asked why she was armed and how it was self-defense.

Carmela is asked if she has anything to say to the victims' families. She is then questioned about why she was armed at school and asked to explain how it was self-defense.