reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Antisemitism is “you know, it’s always kind of lurking underneath, and you need sometimes sometimes events over the years, you know, pull it out.” The speaker recalls Captain Dreyfus being accused of treason in France and Theodor Herzl watching, and suddenly, “kill Dreyfus, kill all the Jews.” The question is, where did “kill all the Jews” come from? The response is that, from one guy, antisemitism can surge. The speaker notes that today we have our Dreyfus again. We have the war. We have Jeffrey Epstein, who, the speaker says, “hated Israel,” and “had nothing there was nothing about him that was Jewish. Didn’t observe Judaism, didn’t practice Judaism.” The speaker adds as a side thought: “If you don’t mind me jumping in on this,” and then discusses a common claim: people say you can be anti-Zionist without being anti-Semitic, arguing that Judaism is just a religion, not a nationality, so they are not against the religion but against the nation, and it “shouldn’t be considered a nation.” The speaker then contends that Epstein is not a Jew under that standard because there is nothing about him that identifies with Israel. The only related claim is that “one of his emails says, I hate Israel. Right? There’s nothing about him that is religious at all.” However, when it comes to antisemitism, the speaker asserts, “he’s a Jew.” That is presented as the final point on Epstein’s case. The speaker mentions Epstein “tried to work with a former prime minister,” calling that his only connection. The former prime minister referred to is David Barak, described as not in politics for many, many years and having no influence in Israel, and “is the, kind of, the main political antagonist of Netanyahu.” The transcript notes that Epstein’s only connection was with David Barak, and that Barak is viewed as Netanyahu’s main political antagonist, despite Barak’s long absence from active politics. The passage ends with that acknowledgment of Epstein’s connection being limited to Barak.

The speaker accuses a certain community of destroying schools, hospitals, and the army. They claim that the police have been infiltrated by this community. The speaker warns against blaming their own community and states that they have not made any reproaches. The transcript is in French.

The speaker contrasts European political responses to immigration and crime with American policies, arguing that European left-wing politicians ignore urgent problems. They claim: - In Spain, “they just legalized residents of half a million illegal aliens.” - In France, “they throw grenades into hair salons in a broad daylight.” - In Germany, “not a single day goes by without someone being murdered with a knife.” - In Sweden, “you have bomb attack every other day.” The speaker asserts that these are real problems for the European left-wing politicians, yet contends that those politicians do not care. The immediate target is a European debate about the rule of law in the United States and deportation policies: the speaker says, “You are seriously discussing here the rule of law in United States and criticizing American government for deporting illegal aliens, for deporting criminals out of their territory in the same time when Western European cities are gradually turning into a war zone.” A call is made to apply the same approach in Europe: “We should do exactly the same. We should deport them from Europe and not legalize their stay.” The speaker urges listening to them and not to “what you are proposing to all of us,” asserting that “Everybody can see, no, you are enemies of Europe. You hate Europe.” The rhetoric culminates in a warning: “You hate our nations, and you want to destroy the future for our children. We should stop you. We should defeat you politically if we want to survive. Otherwise, it will be the end of Europe.”

Every store on this street has been broken into, except for the red wing store. It's strange because there's no broken glass or graffiti there. The Champion and North Face stores were targeted, even AT&T was hit, but the red wing store remained untouched.

There is a growing antisemitism in France and Europe, but it is not accurate to say that the French people are antisemitic. The antisemitism comes from the Islamized suburbs, influenced by Arab and Islamic culture, which expresses hostility towards Jews and Christians. This hostility is rooted in texts like the Quran and hadiths, which refer to Jews and Christians as pigs and dogs. The rise in antisemitism is not due to the French population, but rather the importation of a population that has been anti-Jewish for centuries. Some individuals exploit this situation for political reasons, using the anti-Jewish sentiment along with anti-police and anti-French sentiments prevalent in these Islamized suburbs.

Speaker 0 asserts that specific issues like murder, rape, and pimping are happening in towns and cities and are unique to the Islamic community, not occurring within the Sikh or Jewish communities. While acknowledging the existence of white drug dealers and gangs, Speaker 0 claims certain problems, such as terrorism and hostile activity towards youth, stem solely from the Islamic community. Speaker 0 suggests this community is "spreading" these issues, leading to problems like groups of Muslim men congregating near school gates and targeting youth for pimping. Speaker 0 argues that while white people may commit similar crimes, it's not in the same manner or group dynamic, implying a cultural aspect within the Islamic community.

A group of boys threatened a police officer, promising harm to a dog. Later, they marched through London streets, shouting anti-Semitic remarks, while the police took no action. This incident highlights the rise of anti-Jewish sentiment. Shortly after, we were violently attacked while leaving a kosher restaurant, making us question the future for Jews in this country. Extremists target us on the streets, and the police remain inactive. In another incident, a pro-Palestinian convoy threatened to rape Jewish women and children in a Jewish neighborhood. The perpetrators then drove through the same neighborhood, spreading inflammatory messages.

The speaker asserts that organized grooming gangs, mostly of Muslim origin, exist in various locations, citing Rochdale, Rotherham, Telford, and Norfolk. They claim court cases reveal most perpetrators are of Kashmiri Pakistani origin. The speaker alleges police and social workers avoided addressing the problem due to fear of being labeled racist. In response, another speaker accuses them of turning a question about sexual violence into one about religion. They state that the majority of rapes and sexual violence in the country are perpetrated by white people.

Immigrants are accused of committing crimes such as rape and burglary. They are seen as savages who don't speak the language and view us with disdain.

There is a problem of anti-Semitism in certain Muslim communities, which has been imported due to mass migration. The insecurity and anti-Semitism in France today are a result of uncontrolled immigration over the past 50 years. With 6 million Muslims and only 600,000 Jews, being both French and Jewish can make you feel like a foreigner in your own country. Muslims, including those working on construction sites, have access to explosives and firearms, which could lead to daily attacks if there was a directive to kill Jews. The goal of Islamists is to create the perception of Muslim persecution.

I was arrested, interrogated, and threatened multiple times. Western countries need stricter immigration laws to prevent our defeat. People label us as Islamophobes, but if you examine the text and history, you'll see how Muslims have historically applied hate towards Jews and Christians. In 1948, when Israel was established, all Muslim countries expelled Jews, resulting in 830,000 deaths. Hate is the underlying cause, and it is deeply ingrained in Islam.

There is a discussion about immigration and its connection to criminal activity in New York City. The speaker mentions that while many immigrants are hardworking and looking for a better life, there is a small group involved in organized theft. This group operates on mopeds and scooters, stealing items like iPhones and clothing. The speaker highlights the criminal charges against them and the pattern of their activities. It is noted that these criminals travel to Florida to spend the stolen money before returning to New York. The speaker questions why they don't just stay in New York to commit crimes, to which the response is that they would end up in jail.

There is a dark matter still in the world today: human ritual sacrifice, an ancient practice, and it has been something for which Jewish extremists have often been accused throughout time. Understandably, many people are skeptical of this bizarre accusation that has the Jewish people for at least two thousand years. After all, why would fanatical Jews in the past and perhaps even to this very day commit human sacrifice? Many people do not like to even think about the topic, believing it to be pure anti-Jewish propaganda. Likewise, the Jews themselves are quick to say that such claims are lies handed down through the centuries. However, there are two sides to this issue. One side believes Jewish ritual murder is not merely anti-Jewish propaganda, but a fact that has had a terrible impact on society since it began. Perhaps some viewers may doubt what is uncovered in this video, but an honest glimpse into this matter may make you think. Likewise, an in-depth and fair examination will make most skeptics into true believers. It is true that many of the people who conducted research into these matters were branded by Jews with the epithet of anti-Semite. A term used by Jews to stifle discussion on any topic that criticizes them. Certainly, however, if someone who is branded an anti-Semite by Jews says the sky appears blue on a sunny day, is it any less blue just because the so-called anti-Semite said it was? This is usually the case with respect to these matters. While some people who investigated these matters were really anti-Semites, it was the fact that human sacrifice was practiced by Jews that caused many of these people to become anti-Semites. After uncovering the secret among the Jewish cult in times past, how could a Gentile feel otherwise? After all it is not the anti-Semite who commits the foul act of human sacrifice, now commonly referred to as Jewish ritual murder. Yet Jews sought to make the Gentiles who reported these crimes appear worse than the Jews who committed them. Most historians know and admit that human sacrifice has occurred in the past amongst various sects. The Aztecs’ blood-stained temples attest to this. Many innocents met their fate that way with their hearts plucked from their bodies. The practice called in India where women would sacrifice themselves in flames is still practiced today in obscure parts where some of India's 1,000,000,000 mostly Hindus live. In Mexico, even just a few years ago, a strange cult was uncovered that had sacrificed many people, including American college student Mark Kilroy. The same is true of Africa and various parts of South America today. If you merely comb the Internet, you’ll realize that, yes, there are some groups who still engage in barbaric practices such as human sacrifice. So what are the facts about the Jews? Have they also engaged in such terrible acts in the past? And could there be some proven sect amongst Jews, extremists no doubt, who to this very day still commit the wicked crime of ritual murder. Most Jews have asked about ritual murder will vehemently deny any knowledge of it, of course. And they’re probably telling you the truth. If there are Jewish hate mongers who engage in these acts and there is strong evidence to indicate such, it is probably only a small number of them. So if this is indeed the case, one question still remains. What makes these crimes stand apart from other cruel acts committed by man against man in the past? The answer to this question is not a pretty one. Based on numerous reports from the past to modern times, the main difference is the degree of cruelty. Reports say children sacrificed in Jewish occult rights were tortured to death in the most cruel and heartless ways imaginable. After the ceremony, Jews reportedly dried the child’s blood, often absorbing it into paper, for their various occult rights. Aside from claims of Jewish ritual murder being carried out in an extremely vicious manner, there’s one other difference that sets this crime apart from others. When such crimes are uncovered, not only the local Jewish groups, but Jews from all over the entire world seek to conceal it. In the past, Jews have even set aside a special fund to cover up such acts. However, by doing this they become as a police might say, an accessory after the fact. From time to time, there have been brave and honest Jews who would deviate from their kinsfolk and admit to the truth of these crimes. While such honesty was not common amongst Jews, it still occurred on occasions. For this reason alone, indictment against all Jews cannot be made. Indeed, some Jews, young and old, have admitted these crimes in front of court, written about them in books, discussed them in debates, and so forth. For the most part, however, Jews typically deny such accusations. They have even developed a phrase for this type of accusation, blood libel. This term is often used as a rallying cry amongst Jewish groups.

Nonwestern migrants have been entering Europe for years, causing concerns about the changing political landscape and cultural clashes. Some individuals express fear that their way of life is being threatened and worry about the rise of Sharia law. There are also claims of a supposed increase in rape cases attributed to immigrant non Western males. Police statistics from Oslo indicate that all assault cases between strangers were committed by these immigrants, with the majority of victims being native Norwegian women.

The people committing violence are not the same ones peacefully protesting immigration enforcement. The violent individuals wear hoodies and face masks, using similar tactics across different civil unrest situations. They are connected, and some might call them anarchists. Many of these individuals come from other places specifically to hurt people and cause havoc.

Je dis que les noirs musulmans sont inférieurs aux Roms, qui sont mieux organisés. Les noirs sont en bas de l'échelle. C'est mon expérience de vie.

The speaker, an experienced nurse in Marseille, disagrees with the negative views on immigrants. She mentions that most of her patients are elderly immigrants who have contributed to France and have raised their children well. However, these patients express harsh and violent opinions about the country and its people. The other speaker acknowledges the colonization history and the fact that immigrants have now settled in France and have many children. The nurse mentions that some elderly immigrants even consider the French people to be their slaves. The other speaker asks if the nurse has heard such comments frequently, to which she responds that it requires a certain level of trust for patients to share these views.

Europeans and Jews have a long history of conflict, with Jews being expelled from many nations. They were accused of exploiting and corrupting host nations, leading to their expulsion. Jewish supremacists often blame antisemitism for these conflicts.

Many people of European descent are seeking to assign blame for ongoing societal changes, particularly regarding immigration. It is acknowledged that some individuals of Jewish background are involved in organizations that promote third-world immigration into Western countries. This has led to a perception among some Europeans and Americans that there is a Jewish conspiracy aimed at undermining white societies. Some even claim this is a deliberate act of revenge.

Immigrants are allegedly behaving according to their customs, such as killing ducks in the park for food. A van was reportedly pulled over containing over 100 cats with Haitians who admitted to eating them. The speaker claims to have witnessed this incident, with the people in the van admitting to the police that they were eating the cats.

In a field report from the Holy Land, Tucker Carlson and his team explore the lived experience of Christians in a region where religion, politics, and funding intertwine. The segment frames Christendom’s presence as both historical and fragile, shaped by borders, custodianship, and shifting demographics. - The setting and question: Carlson pulses between Nazareth and Jerusalem-adjacent areas, noting that the Holy Land lies within Jordan—a predominantly Muslim monarchy that funds much of the region’s religious and cultural life. The central question is how Christians are faring: thriving or suffering? The host asserts that in Israel, Christians are not thriving; their numbers are shrinking in absolute terms and as a share of the population, especially since the Gaza War and the rise of extremism. Clips circulating online purportedly show Christian clergy in Jerusalem spat upon by Jewish extremists, raising concerns about anti-Christian hostility that US funding seems to overlook or deny. - The Archbishop of Jerusalem (born in Nazareth) speaks frankly about decline and exposure to oppression: he says Christians in the Holy Land have been here for two thousand years, but today they are in a period of decline. Since 1948, many Christians fled or were expelled; the Christian population halved, with subsequent declines after 1967. He emphasizes Jerusalem as the spiritual capital of the Christian faith, but notes the thinning presence and the difficulties of sustaining communities, particularly in Nazareth and the Galilee, where emigration has increased in two recent decades. - Refugees and the Christian presence: The Archbishop notes that many Palestinian refugees from the 1948 creation of Israel were Christians, contradicting the stereotype that Palestinian refugees are predominantly Muslim. He gives an example of Beirut’s All Saints Anglican community, which is 90% Palestinian Christians from Galilee, illustrating long-standing Christian diaspora within the region. Bethlehem is highlighted as a site of economic and religious pressure due to the separation wall and movement restrictions; the Christian population in Bethlehem has fallen from about 100,000 to under 30,000. He attributes some of these declines to limited aid, both domestically and from Western churches, and to concerns that donations can end up in the wrong hands. - Aid and funding dynamics: The Archbishop argues that while Western churches provide some support through bodies like the American Friends of the Diocese of Jerusalem, a disproportionately large share of Western Christian aid flows to Jewish settlements rather than to Nazareth or Bethlehem. He contends that money from the West can be linked to settlement expansion and land confiscation in Christian areas, creating moral tension for Western Christians who fund the region. He cites Jordan’s King Abdullah as a donor who has funded repairs to sacred sites such as the Nativity and the Holy Sepulchre, illustrating a different model of custodianship and interfaith stewardship. - Custodianship and Jerusalem’s status quo: The Jordanian king is described as the custodian of holy sites in Jerusalem, including Al Aqsa and the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, a framework the Archbishop says maintains a shared space for Christianity, Judaism, and Islam. He argues that handing custodianship entirely to the Israeli government would produce exclusivity and degrade the three-faith balance that has historically preserved access to sacred sites. - Practical realities for worship and safety: The Archbishop details routine security constraints around the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, especially on Holy Saturday during Holy Fire, where Israeli police restrict attendance and limit pilgrims, sometimes to a fraction of typical numbers for “safety reasons.” He notes that similar restrictions affect other holy sites and events across Israel and neighboring areas, including Orthodox and Jewish observances. He references efforts to engage U.S. diplomats, like Ambassador Mike Huckabee, to address these access limits, though without consistent success. - Everyday threats and incidents: The Archbishop describes spitting at clergy as a recurring, if not constant, problem in Jerusalem, tied to fringe groups and to a broader climate of secular or religious animus. There is talk of vandalism and intimidation directed at Christian sites, with limited legal recourse because spitting and harassment are not consistently criminalized in the way the clergy and authorities would hope. - The West Bank and Jordan as a model: The Jordanian Christian interlocutor (Speaker 3) frames Jordan as a regional model for coexistence, arguing that Christians in Jordan feel integrated with Muslims and receive constitutional protection and equal rights. He highlights three pillars of Jordan’s Christian flourishing: constitutional equality, political and social stability, and Hashemite leadership that prioritizes interfaith dialogue, meritocracy, and mercy. He notes Christian representation across government and business, suggesting that, despite being a minority (roughly 3%), Christians are disproportionately represented in leadership roles, which he sees as evidence of a functioning model for minority resilience. - Refugees as a regional test: The Jordanian interlocutor emphasizes Jordan’s long history of hosting refugees from Jerusalem, Gaza, Syria, and Iraq, framing Jordan as a nation built on refugee experience and humanitarian responsibility. He stresses that stability in Jordan—economic, political, and social—depends on leadership, constitutional rights, and the willingness of the international community to sustain support, particularly given donor fatigue and shifting attention from the US and other partners. - A plea to Western Christians: The interview closes with a call for American Christians to engage directly with ancient Christian communities in the Holy Land, to listen to their experiences, and to support stability and coexistence without reducing faith to political slogans or demonizing one group. The Archbishop concludes with a hopeful vision: Jerusalem should belong to all people, a sacred center for Christians, Jews, and Muslims alike. In sum, the conversation juxtaposes narratives of Christian decline and resilience, heavily weighted by political context, funding flows, and interfaith custodianship. It presents Jordan as a contrasting, stabilizing model for minority Christian life in the Middle East while insisting that Western Christian communities rethink their engagement and support for Christian communities in the Holy Land.

A restaurant in Porte de Saint-Cloud was burglarized, with the manager finding a locked toilet door and an unconscious thief inside. The burglar, a 17-year-old repeat offender, was taken into custody. The restaurant owner expressed anger and frustration, feeling helpless and concerned for the safety of their children. The issue of unaccompanied minors involved in criminal activities was also discussed, with a rise in incidents in the 15th arrondissement. These minors find new locations to hide from the police, committing various crimes. The problem remains unresolved due to the complexities of dealing with underage offenders and the inability to deport them. The impact of their actions is significant, as seen in incidents such as a pregnant woman being attacked by Moroccan minors in Paris. The woman's condition and the fate of her fetus are currently being assessed.

The speaker claims that the individuals committing violence are distinct from those peacefully protesting immigration enforcement. These violent individuals are hooded, masked, and move from one civil unrest situation to another, employing similar tactics. The speaker alleges these individuals are connected, often labeled anarchists, and travel from city to city to instigate harm and chaos. The speaker finds it disgusting that many of these people come from other places just to hurt people and to cause havoc.

These immigrants are accused of committing crimes such as rape and burglary. They are also seen as uncivilized because they don't speak the local language and view the native population with disdain.

Speaker 0 describes a conversation with a Somali neighbor about what he calls "Somalian fraud" in Minnesota. The neighbor explains that many Somalis come from clan-based and Muslim-majority backgrounds with distinct beliefs about spoils, subjugation, and taxation. He says that, in Somalia, Muslims believe the spoils of war are rightfully theirs and that, when they subjugate non-believers, they impose a tax on them. He asserts that Somalis in Minnesota view their “plunder” as something that non-believers pay to them, effectively framing it as a tax paid by white people to Somalis and Muslims. The neighbor further claims that Somalis “do not comprehend the Western laws” and do not see them as competing with the Sharia law they practice. He explains that the outrage over fraud is hard for them to grasp because, in their belief system, these actions are permitted. He also states that in their religion, they are permitted to lie, and that their behavior in Minnesota—being outraged when fraud is exposed—aligns with teachings that permit lying, taxing non-believers, and plundering because it is viewed as rightfully theirs. The speaker reflects that this perspective might make sense if one is raised under one belief system and moves to another, and notices dissonance with Western norms. He adds a postscript noting that the neighbor suggested people might be upset about issues like marrying very young girls, pointing to cultural practices they say have been happening in Somalia. In sum, the speaker relays a neighbor’s claim that Somalis view Western laws as subordinate to their Sharia-based beliefs, justify exploitation as rightful “plunder” and taxation of non-believers, and may excuse deception as permissible, framing these actions as consistent with their religious and cultural background.