reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker explains they paid $15,000 to go and interview Clavicular for a thirty-minute session. The purpose was to ask about Clavicular’s funding, his business, and rumors about him and Peter Thiel, because those rumors are everywhere. However, the moment the interviewer brought up Peter Thiel and Palantir, Clavicular panicked, flipped it on the interviewer, and claimed that the interviewer was the one funded by Peter Thiel. Clavicular stated that his team did research on the interviewer and that there were blockchain ties from Thiel-funded parties to the interviewer’s wallet, which, according to him, there’s zero proof of because it never happened. He claimed he literally couldn't show one single receipt that the interviewer is Peter Thiel funded or Peter Thiel backed, and he said, “I'll wait.” The interviewer asks for clarification: “So let me get this straight. You charge $15,000 for thirty minutes, and then you can't handle a single question. Like, source, I just made it up.” The interviewer adds, “And then you're calling me a scammer, but literally what you just did is scamming. Like, nobody told me to do this. I went solo. I came alone.” The interviewer explains that the only reason for asking about Thiel was because everybody was saying that Peter Thiel is the one that got clavicular released from jail and dropped all of the charges. The interviewer concludes, “So, yeah, I just got fraud maxed, but it's pretty pretty clear that clavicular is funded by Peter Thiel.”

I want to share my experience of being tortured in federal prison. Roger Ver has been arrested, and it's crucial to support him. I ended up in prison for expressing views like "taxation is theft." Roger is a true pioneer, advocating for individual empowerment globally. Despite paying a million dollars to the government, they claim it's not enough. His lawyers argue he complied with the law, yet he's being targeted. This case reflects a broader trend of the government silencing dissidents. Roger has significantly contributed to Bitcoin, which has the potential to challenge oppressive systems. It's alarming that the only person prosecuted for an exit tax interpretation is someone exposing government attempts to infiltrate Bitcoin. We can't change the past, but we can unite to shape the future. Free Roger.

The Samurai Wallet software developers, Kiano Rodriguez (37) and William Hill (67), are going to spend the next five years and the next four years in prison for writing an open-source, non-custodial Bitcoin wallet that kept users’ Bitcoin private. The speaker says this case wasn’t a fair trial and mirrors the corruption of the system, noting the court pulled out 2018 text messages from conversations with friends. In those messages, Keanu explains that mixing Bitcoin is about privacy, not crime, and is a way for people not to be tracked or to see how much Bitcoin they own, since Bitcoin is a public ledger. He jokes that it’s “money laundering for Bitcoin,” but the court only highlighted the money-laundering aspect. Six months before the charges, FinCEN (“the actual money transmission regulators”) asked them if they were breaking the law, and they said no, because Samurai Wallet does not take custody of funds. The DOJ allegedly buried that information for years, a year after they said they weren’t breaking the law, which the speaker calls a complete violation. The judge is described as not caring. The speaker says Samurai Wallet operated legally for ten years with legal advice and never took custody of anyone’s Bitcoin, so they were not a financial institution, merely a service. Last year, 50 FBI agents raided Rodriguez’s house, treated him as if he were El Chapo. The speaker cites a memo by Tom Blanch, Trump’s deputy attorney general, from April stating that software developers should not be prosecuted because they are not committing the crime—described as “ending regulation by prosecution.” The claim is that arresting coders is absurd, likening it to jailing Bill Gates for creating Microsoft or jailing the CEO of OnlyFans for its content. Additionally, the speakers allege the defendants were obligated to hand over over $6,000,000 worth of Bitcoin to the New York Justice Department and sold it within the first hour, contrary to higher-level statements about how Bitcoin should be held. They criticize the situation as a retreat from privacy and liken it to a repeated, dangerous playbook seen in other cases, such as Ross Ulbricht. There is hope, as Trump reportedly took 37 seconds to analyze the Samurai Wallet case and asked a lawyer to see if a pardon is possible. A petition to help them is mentioned, along with a donation option to their families, with a link promised below. The speaker then promotes Casa, stating they enable self-custody wallets with multisig, multiple fail-safes, inheritance planning, and hardware wallets, offering one-on-one support and a code “YOLO” with $200 off or 10% off, and promises a link below.

I'm being extradited from Spain to the US to face 109 years in prison for tax evasion, even though I'm not a US citizen during the period in question. I believe this isn't about taxes; it's about my defiance. I was the first to invest in Bitcoin and promote its use globally as an alternative to government-controlled currencies. This threatened governments, and I knew it was dangerous. I renounced my US citizenship in 2014 and became a citizen of Saint Kitts, believing this would protect me. Despite meticulously following tax laws, I was arrested shortly after publishing a book exposing the hijacking of Bitcoin. My arrest is retaliation for promoting cryptocurrency as a competitor to the US dollar and other established currencies. Effectively, they want me dead in prison. As the founder of several major cryptocurrency companies, I seeded the first generation of cryptocurrency firms, and my actions directly challenge the status quo.

I was part of the group arrested for the Whitmer kidnap plot, which was set up by the FBI. I was acquitted. I thought I was doing security work, but it turned out to be targeting Whitmer's cottage. I got charged for material support terrorism and felony firearm possession. The government lied about the situation. I urge people to take action to ensure real justice in the face of government overreach.

Steven Narioff, a key figure in the development of Ethereum, declined a significant amount of money in ether when the cryptocurrency was founded. He believed in the vision of a decentralized network and wanted to eliminate conflicts of interest. However, his actions have caused controversy in the crypto community, with allegations of conspiracy and government targeting. The dispute revolves around the centralization versus decentralization debate. There are also claims of attempts to control and manipulate the Ethereum network. The involvement of various individuals, including Joe Lubin and Michael Haledi, further complicates the situation. The FBI's actions and charges against Narioff have raised suspicions of a coordinated effort to prosecute him. The next installment will delve into allegations of connections to the Chinese Communist Party and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

I've always been against crypto, especially Bitcoin, because it is mainly used by criminals for activities like drug trafficking, money laundering, and tax evasion. Its anonymity and instant money transfers allow it to bypass systems like know your customers, sanctions, and OFAC. If I were in power, I would shut it down. On September 12th, Jamie Dimon called Bitcoin a fraud and threatened to fire any trader buying it. This caused a 24% drop in Bitcoin's value. Interestingly, Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan, companies led by Dimon, were the largest buyers of a Bitcoin fund in Europe. It's unethical for Dimon to criticize Bitcoin while his own company is investing in it.

My name is Roger Veer, and I'm a former American citizen now facing a possible life sentence for crimes I didn't commit. Growing up in Silicon Valley, I became fascinated with free market economics and libertarian ideals. I even ran for office as a Libertarian. My criticism of the ATF led to politically motivated charges related to selling firecrackers. After serving time, I left the U.S. Later, I became an early advocate for Bitcoin, recognizing its power to promote economic freedom and undermine government control. Now, I'm arrested in Spain on tax evasion and mail fraud charges that I believe are politically motivated, and a form of lawfare. I had sought legal counsel to ensure compliance with the law. This isn't about taxes; it's about suppressing freedom.

Damian Williams, the United States attorney in the Southern District of New York, accuses Sam Bankman Fried of committing a massive financial fraud to establish himself as a crypto king. While the cryptocurrency industry and players like Sam are relatively new, this type of fraud and corruption is not. Williams emphasizes that they have zero tolerance for such behavior.

The speaker claims the individual credited with inventing Bitcoin, Santoshi, denied creating the technology in an interview. The speaker suggests three-letter agencies are actually behind Bitcoin and cryptocurrency, giving it a false origin story of a rebel fighting the system. They question how Santoshi would have acquired the necessary technology and infrastructure, given the fate of historical figures who opposed the system. The speaker implies Bitcoin may have a backdoor and notes Google possesses decryption technology developed before the cryptocurrency boom, suggesting this is not coincidental.

Samuel Bankman Fried, accused of a major financial fraud, was arrested. Gary Gensler, the SEC chairman and former Wall Street multimillionaire, had meetings with Fried during the fraud. Gensler made a lot of money on Wall Street and refuses to answer Congress's questions about his interactions with Fried. Congress is considering issuing a subpoena to the SEC to get answers from Gensler. The question remains: What is Gensler hiding?

The speaker identifies as a January 6th defendant who was held pretrial for four years. They claim the government wanted them to make a false statement about Roger Stone's involvement, and that they were offered no charges in exchange for the statement. The speaker alleges torture of pretrial American citizens and contrasts their situation with the handling of BLM and Antifa rioters, claiming those rioters received lighter sentences. They mention a $30,000,000 settlement in the Ashley Babbitt lawsuit. They state they have 5,000 pages of documentation available open source. As a result of their experience, the speaker says they lost their wife, child, house, job, and name, but anticipates being "stupid paid" by the government.

The old content from ten years ago is being conflated with the current charges from 2021, but anything before 2021 has nothing to do with the case. Here's context for a video circulating of me talking about the "Lover Boy method." You can't just ask a girl to work for you doing webcam. My recruitment process is like a PhD course; I message them on Instagram. I don't mention webcam until after I've had sex with the girl. After that, she takes the PhD test. If she passes and wants to be with you, then you can suggest she works for you. Approaching girls directly about webcam doesn't work. Also, tax is important for controlling your woman. Tell her you're paying the tax, even if you aren't because you are being paid in Bitcoin. This makes her think her taxes are taken care of, so you can pay her less.

Together because they are completely interlinked. Epstein is linked with Howard Lutnick, our commerce secretary whose firm manages the treasuries that back tether, the largest stable coin. And Brock Pierce, who was Epstein's crypto adviser, who was a cofounder of Tether and was the head of the Bitcoin Foundation before it collapsed, and then MIT took over the developers is right in the middle of this. So in essence, the endgame of this is what they have figured out as a way to have a backdoor CBDC where they specifically profit. I'm starting to call this now the creature from Epstein's Island because in the end, what are we getting out of this? We have something called USAT, which is the new official stable coin that complies with the genius act. So we have a situation where it's a digital token backed by fiat, backed by treasuries that can be programmed, tracked, and censored. And the biggest financial beneficiary is Howard Lutnick's firm. They managed to create so think about it this way. He's managed to create a central bank digital currency where only one firm profits from all of the fees for managing the treasuries. This is the biggest financial heist probably in human history. And it is connected directly to Epstein and Brock Pierce and the hijacking of Bitcoin. That's how they're linked. Now, do I think were they playing five d chess and this is what they thought was gonna happen? I don't know. May be if so, it's very clever or were they opportunistic about it? But make no mistake about it. These government regulated stablecoins are backdoor CBDCs in not in the sense that they're issued by the central bank, but in the sense that they are controlled and surveilled by the government and tracked by the government, which after all is the thing that people are worried about with CBDCs. The concern isn't really so much about the central bank. Of course, the central bank is complete unnecessary third party, but financial surveillance comes from Congress. All of the bank secrecy laws, all of the tracking and the suspicious activity reports, this is Congress. This is not the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve does not initiate any of that. So this is in many respects worse than the creature from Jackal Island. This is worse than the creation of the Federal Reserve itself because what it's done is created a digital dollar where one political member of a cabinet, his family and his company is the biggest single beneficiary. One of the things that came out of the Epstein file is Lutnick's claim that he was disgusted by Epstein and had nothing to do with him after 2006. The emails show Lutnick emailing Epstein coordinating to visit Epstein on Epstein's Island with his yacht and with his family. There's another email showing Lutnick contributing $50,000 to an event that Epstein was running. Lutnick flat out lied, and I will have to check whether that was under oath about his relationship and association with Epstein. He was a next door neighbor of Epstein and bought his house from Epstein. The connections here are overwhelming. It's so much data to map that I'm using AI to start making initial connections, then humans correct. How do these pieces fit from a timetable perspective? This is game changing. Epstein's hijacking of Bitcoin has not been widely acknowledged, and some Bitcoin Maxis resist this information. I urge people to do their own research, not to rely on spin. Look into Epstein's emails via Jmail and other sources. The information is out there, including the Epstein files, and the article I wrote for Brownstone at brownstone.org with screenshots of emails. Do your research. Don't accept a single influencer's take. Epstein literally funded changing the Bitcoin protocol to make it digital gold, yet there is no indication he actually held Bitcoin. This warrants investigation. Roger Ver, once a prominent Bitcoin advocate, has described hijacking in his own book, and his later treatment suggests suppression. The broader point is that there are deeply interwoven connections among Epstein, Lutnick, Pierce, Tether, and the Bitcoin ecosystem, with implications for who profits and how governance and surveillance could unfold.

Life in prison is dystopian, but I'm not in physical danger and some staff are helpful. It's crushing to be locked in a room with others charged with crimes, where trivial things become everything. Trial was difficult; I'd wake at 4AM, spend hours in transit, then trial all day, getting back too late for legal work. Now, I read, play chess, and work on my case. I regret not communicating effectively during the crisis, getting lost in details. The digital world is productive, but limiting without it. I've made some friends, even Diddy, who's kind. The other inmates are alleged ex-gangsters. I've learned that intelligence isn't everything; grit and instincts matter. I was shocked by DC politics. Gensler's SEC was a nightmare, blocking crypto innovation. I didn't call in favors when things went south, DOJ had already decided. Crypto's future depends on regulatory changes and focusing on technology, not just investment.

Do my family and friends know I'm in this business? Yes, they do. You think I'm stealing? How? It's not stealing, it's legal. The tokens are real, people buy them. You say the tokens are worth nothing? No, they're worth something. You can still sell. People investing don't know their money will disappear? It's a gamble and they lost. It's a legal way of making money, a legal way of stealing. We wear masks because I'm recognizable. I'm connected with celebrities. It would put a stop to my lifestyle. Do I feel bad about people losing money, like their retirement? I'm just trying to get it. So, no, I don't care.

Speaker 0 notes that the people are not accusing him of rape or selling anyone; they are facing charges including human trafficking, rape, and forming a criminal gang to sexually exploit. Speaker 1 describes OnlyFans as “the best hustle in the world.” He explains the alleged methods: using the “lover boy method,” coercing by being nice, and not mentioning webcam until after sex. He says mentioning webcam on dates “just doesn’t work” and claims he would never do that, arguing the technique is to proceed normally and introduce webcam later. Speaker 2 and Speaker 3 discuss a program called PhD on corporatetake.com: “PhD is a pimp and hose degree.” He claims it teaches how he met girls, how he got girls to like him, how he got girls to fall in love with him to work on webcam, and how to have them spend more time with him. He describes inviting a prospective recruit to a meeting and bringing a girl who works for “Your bottom bitch” to explain the selling. The process emphasizes a “first girl” as pivotal, with girls on camera together the first day so the new girl can observe and imitate. Speaker 4 recounts specific experiences: being bought wine and becoming nervous about webcam work; the narrator describes wealth from webcam operations and retaining girls; he mentions four locations and 75 girls, with roughly half of the money going to the workers, claiming a 50% split and suggesting taxes explain the disparity. Another worker, paid a flat £15 per hour, notes large sums from clients who believed they would meet the girl. Speaker 1 describes a pattern where men fell in love with his models and sent large amounts of money, including people selling houses and life savings. He states: “I used sex as a tool to make women love me so they'd obey me and live in my house to make me money. That’s what I wanted. So I was a pimp in that sense.” He discusses the emotional manipulation that led clients to believe they would meet the girl. Speaker 5 remains skeptical, labeling the operation “pimpy.” Speaker 1 argues about the Me Too era, saying he is not a rapist in a way that would be labeled, yet he admits he likes the freedom to do what he wants. Speaker 6 challenges Speaker 1 by quoting his own statements: that his job was to meet a girl, sleep with her, get her to fall in love, and then get her on webcam to become rich together. Speaker 1 denies that exact quote, but Speaker 6 insists it matches what was said on the website. Speaker 0 reiterates that the belief is he was charged with human trafficking, and Speaker 1 clarifies that “human trafficking” is framed as forcing a girl to work for financial gain, noting TikTok accounts from some girls as part of the justification. He reiterates the PhD as a pimp and hose degree he claims to be pleasant about.

Speaker 0 accuses the Democrat Washington DC establishment and mainstream media of gaslighting Americans and lying to them. He says Christopher Wray appeared at congressional testimony claiming ignorance about undercover FBI agents, and alleges that people were left in solitary confinement in the DC Jail for eighteen months without family visits, shaves, or haircuts. He claims the FBI and others orchestrated events to paint Donald Trump as a domestic terrorist and to portray Trump supporters as wild extremists, while agents within the crowd agitated and destroyed a peaceful protest, turning it into chaos in which people felt they were fighting for their lives. Speaker 0 asserts that four unarmed Americans were killed that day: Ashley Babbitt, Roseanne Boylan, Kevin Greeson, and Benjamin Phillips, and says the FBI set up their murders with no accountability. He mentions that President Trump posted about the alleged lying to Congress and predicts an impending federal indictment for Wray, and he says “Read the messages I left you in the DC jail walls. You deserve it. Sleep well on that metal mattress.” Speaker 1 responds with “That’s right,” then asks about plans for legal action, noting a $25,000,000 lawsuit and asking whether it has been filed. Speaker 0 explains they filed a form 95, an official notice to the FBI and DOJ seeking recompense and reconciliation, stating they are coming for recompense and the American people deserve redress for families of January 6 detainees and others whose lives were affected, including people whose careers were destroyed. He says they will be filing an official federal court lawsuit that week. Speaker 0 contends the DOJ and FBI are complicit in a cover-up intended to overthrow the government and describes a plan from January 6 to create a false insurrection narrative to use a constitutional amendment to block Trump from running for president, labeling this a coup d'etat amounting to subversion of the will of the American people. He asserts due process violations by Christopher Wray, including Brady material violations (exculpatory evidence withheld), and claims such evidence was hidden from them. Speaker 1 asks how long Speaker 0 was held, and Speaker 0 states he was held for four years and one thousand four hundred sixty-seven days without a trial, noting he has no criminal record and repeatedly asking why federal agents, DHS agents, and confidential human sources were not disclosed, asserting these omissions violated the Fourth, Fifth, and Eighth Amendments and amounted to cruel and unusual punishment without fair due process. He reiterates the duration: four years and 1,467 days in custody without trial.

Do you remember Sam Bankman-Fried? He was seen as a genius, so powerful and wealthy that he attended meetings with prominent figures like Bill Clinton and Tony Blair while looking disheveled. Where is he now? I believe he is in prison, as noted in a Netflix series. That's right, he’s a crook. And who was responsible for his downfall? The Department of Justice.

Life in MDC Brooklyn is dystopian but I'm not in physical danger, and the staff is trying to be helpful. The worst part is being locked in a room with 40 other people, where trivial things become everything. While on trial, I was woken at 4 AM, spent nine hours in transit, and couldn't work on my case. Now, I read, play chess, and try to work on my appeal. I wasn't on Adderall before, but I was overwhelmed by a billion things at FTX. I prefer the digital world for productivity, not leisure. I've made some friends here, including Diddy, who's been kind. Some inmates see me and Diddy as an "opportunity." I've learned intelligence isn't everything; grit and instincts matter. I regret making political donations; I think my shift towards Republicans after initially supporting Biden may have played a role in my situation. The SEC, under Gensler, was a nightmare, blocking crypto innovation with impossible regulations.