reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I'm tired of the complaints from those who feel threatened. If you're competent, you shouldn't be worried. I walk into Congress confidently because I know I've worked much harder to earn my place. When compared to others like Marjorie Taylor Greene or Lauren Boebert, the difference is clear. The only ones upset are those who feel overshadowed by individuals who have historically faced greater challenges. This is why there's resistance to education for all.

She approached me and said that Donald Trump's wall is meant to keep out women. I asked what he was keeping them out of, and she pointed to how he talks about and treats women, including his wife. She mentioned the inauguration, where he walked ahead and left her behind, showing a lack of care. She expressed that he has disdain for women, citing his infamous comment about grabbing women. I suggested he might have been referring to women who tolerate such behavior, but she had no response to that.

I have experienced the consequences of abuse and believe women's private spaces should be exclusively for women. Rape victims should not have to undress in front of men. This issue is pervasive in schools and public facilities, and I will fight against it. Critics claim my language fuels transphobia, but I have supported LGBTQ rights while opposing policies that allow men in women's spaces. I've received numerous death threats for my stance, highlighting the extreme reactions from some. Many women, including those from the left, feel marginalized by these policies. It's crucial to protect women's rights without compromising safety. The hypocrisy of those who preach kindness while attacking dissenters is evident. The focus should be on protecting all women's rights, not just those of trans women.

Republicans are accused of hating gays and women, but I'd rather vote for them than a party that doesn't recognize women. While some criticize Republicans for taking away rights, they argue that the other party is doing the same by not protecting women's rights. The speaker expresses frustration with the focus on trivial issues like bathroom policies while important rights are being eroded. Ultimately, the speaker is confident in their voting choice despite the criticism.

The speaker urges people to resist an administration that is predominantly male, white, and outdated. They emphasize that they will not remain silent or disappear.

The speakers express their frustration with being criticized and labeled by others. They discuss how they are not bothered by the negative comments and emphasize the importance of standing up for their beliefs. They mention a quote by John Adams about the constitution being meant for moral and religious people. They argue that there is a clear distinction between right and wrong, and between different genders. The speakers conclude by stating that they will continue to be outspoken and assertive.

The speaker expresses concern about the replacement of the term "mother" with "birthing people" in official policies. They argue that the current societal environment lacks respect for women, children, and men, and emphasizes the importance of women in shaping nations. The speaker suggests that attacking the concept of motherhood and removing fathers is a strategy to undermine the security and conditioning of society. They highlight the significance of masculinity and femininity in protecting and nurturing individuals and society as a whole.

Speaker 0 describes an encounter where a person tells her, “good luck to your husband dealing with you,” and she responds, “my husband loves me.” The other person replies that “that’s why we’re trying to get him fired,” indicating to Speaker 0 that this is not an isolated incident but part of an organized group aiming to destroy both her and her husband’s livelihoods because of her political criticisms of a foreign government. Speaker 0 emphasizes her husband has nothing to do with her career, works in athletics at a school, loves his students, and is not going to issue a statement condemning his wife. Speaker 0 explains that the group’s goal is to destroy her husband’s livelihood for failing to condemn her publicly. She notes that the husband wants no part in politics and is not responsible for her career. She decides to file a police report and asks for identifying information about a woman she encountered, including video of the woman and her dog, to corroborate the incident. Speaker 0 highlights the woman’s alleged attempt to sic her dog on Speaker 0 and her dog, pointing to the dog’s behavior as evidence. She asks the woman if it was appropriate to use her dog in that way, and the woman denies it, insisting she did not sick the dog on them. The conversation shifts as Speaker 0 presents a separate video that she claims proves her account. The other person attempts to interrupt, insisting, “You’re trying to get me fired,” and Speaker 0 counters that everyone is trying to get her fired and that the other person is part of that group. Speaker 1 admits that others are trying to get Speaker 0 fired and acknowledges that the other person is “part of that everybody.” Speaker 0 reiterates that the woman tried to sic her dog on them and threatens her husband’s livelihood, asserting she will not be intimidated. Speaker 0 emphasizes she will continue her commentary and will not apologize for her actions or stance, even if the confrontation involves threats or stalking behavior online. Throughout, Speaker 0 frames the situation as an organized effort to silence and ruin both her and her husband over her political critique of a foreign government, while defending her husband’s innocence and his separation from her professional life. She asserts resolve to document the incident and press charges, and to persist with her public commentary despite the confrontation.

The speaker asserts being a serious lawmaker despite any negative rhetoric. The speaker also declares, "if you try me, you will find out." They state they do not want to be mean, but simultaneously identify as a "black woman."

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the need to address child abuse and dangerous policies in British Columbia. Speaker 1 recounts being kicked out of the NDP headquarters for raising concerns about a violent criminal transferred to a women's prison. They emphasize the importance of voting out the NDP and promoting conservative values for a return to sanity in the province. The conversation highlights the challenges of discussing controversial topics and the need to change the culture to ensure all voices are heard and valued.

I will not apologize for trying to protect women and girls in sports. This hearing was about protecting women, and I am here to stand up for their rights. We have fought for decades to win these rights, and I will continue to protect them. I am a woman, and I will not stop roaring to protect women, because we have rights too.

The speaker criticizes the conservatives for prioritizing symbols over action during their time in government. They highlight the closure of 9 veterans offices and the lack of investments in cancer research. In contrast, they mention their own investment in the Terry Fox foundation. The speaker also mentions the desecration of the Terry Fox statue and accuses the conservatives of disregarding women's rights in Afghanistan.

Miss Green from Georgia accuses Hunter Biden of being afraid of her words and labels him a coward for not facing her. She claims that it is clear and obvious to everyone watching the hearing that Hunter Biden is terrified of strong conservative Republican women.

The speaker expresses frustration with people who criticize those who support a particular political candidate. They question why these critics attack white individuals instead of engaging in a meaningful discussion. The speaker finds such behavior hateful and believes it undermines their credibility. They urge the critics to sit down and stop acting foolish.

This person is frustrated with cancel culture and wants the speaker to stop talking because nobody wants to hear it. They are angry and tell the speaker to shut up and stop talking.

Trans women are women, but the speaker disagrees. They argue that nobody confronts the speaker's opinion and questions why anyone would want to be close to a trans woman. The speaker insults the trans woman, saying she doesn't look or act like a woman. The trans woman defends herself, stating that many people accept and support her. The conversation becomes heated, and the speaker asks the trans woman to leave their store. The trans woman mentions that some people find the situation hurtful, but the speaker dismisses their feelings, claiming not to care at their age. They mention their service in Vietnam as a reason for their indifference.

Miss Green from Georgia accuses Hunter Biden of being afraid of her words and calls him a coward. She claims that he cannot face strong conservative Republican women and expresses her disappointment in his behavior.

We must unite against the federal government and bullies. The current administration is criticized for being too male, too pale, and too stale. We refuse to remain silent and will not tolerate this oppression.

Speaker 0 questions Nicole about online posts to the Prime Minister of Canada, asking if she has anything to say about that. Speaker 1 asks for specifics: what post, what she specifically said, and whether there is a screenshot. Speaker 0 cites that she online said something specific and asks for clarification. Speaker 1 replies that she said, "he's a Zionist scumbag, and he's not my prime minister," adding that she believes she is not spoken to properly and questions whether she looks like a threat. Speaker 0 explains that they came to talk because those threats were made. Speaker 1 pushes back, saying that the officers should be busy addressing real crime rather than harassing her over things she says online, and questions whether she seriously looks like a threat. Speaker 0 acknowledges and continues. Speaker 1 accuses the officers of wasting tax dollars and asserts that they should not be harassing her for what she says online because she dislikes the prime minister. Speaker 0 states Nicole should be aware that if such behavior continues, there will be consequences, implying potential arrest for threats. Speaker 1 asks what kind of threats they are referring to and demands to see what she said, noting that she still has not been shown. Speaker 0 attempts to explain what she said and what constitutes threats, warning that if those threats continue, she could be arrested and charged. Speaker 1 complains about being interrupted, asking to show what she said, and then launches into a hostile remark, calling the situation Communist Canada and asking how the officers can take pride in their work. Speaker 0 reiterates that she may have her opinion, but she insists she cannot say what she says. Speaker 1 refuses to discuss further, telling them not to touch her door. Speaker 0 says a report will be filed, stating that the search behavior continues, and mentions Trump in a dismissive way ("the Trump blah blah blah blah blah"). Speaker 1 asserts she will say whatever she wants about the prime minister and that they cannot control her speech, calling it just words. Speaker 0 responds that they are asking for non-threatening language. Speaker 1 concludes by stating they will continue to speak freely and that the conversation is over, wishing them a nice day and goodbye.

"I'm surprised by the amount of women, you know, who continue to support him. You know, let's be clear. Women can be misogynists too. We internalize a lot of those values especially if we feel that's what we need to do to stay safe and protected and, you know, have our wealth secured." "And if you're, you know, if you're a right wing woman, you're gonna go along with what your husband says is like, you know, you're the lowly woman." "Yeah. And I and I'm not a person of color, so I don't wanna speak to this from a black, let Latinx, Latina perspective on this. But Tanya and I, as you can tell, you know, both have white skin. And, you know, we'll talk about our own peoples. How, you know, we look very similar, but there can be a lot of hatred of each other along tribal lines." "I mean, I can give an example of that."

The speaker expresses their reluctance to talk to the person they are addressing, specifically because they believe that person has contempt for conservative Canadians. They accuse the person of refusing to answer questions and spreading misinformation that harms Canadians. The speaker challenges the person to name one thing they said that was misinformation.

The speaker declares an end to "wokeness and weakness," specifying the rejection of pronouns, climate change focus, emergency vaccine mandates, and "dudes in dresses."

A speaker stated that anyone who believes males are smarter than females has serious problems. The speaker expressed frustration that some men would refuse to vote for a female president because they don't think females are smart enough. The speaker then said, "We could line all those guys up and shoot them," before immediately retracting the statement and asking for it to be removed from the recording. The speaker did not want the dean to hear that statement.

The speaker opposes Bill C-16 and refuses to use gender pronouns demanded by transgender activists. They believe it is ridiculous and an invasion of personal rights. They mention the importance of the word "Ms." in the English language, which provided dignity and authority to women regardless of marital status. They criticize the political agitation to change everyday speech and express their frustration with people searching for their own identity and imposing it on others. The speaker asserts that the English language belongs to everyone and rejects the idea of being told how to use pronouns.