reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Yesterday I put up a video about parasites being made by the body, and YouTube decided to delete it. So let's do a giveaway, share this video, and talk about the truth. Comment dragon's blood for your chance to win one. It all starts with John D. Rockefeller—the one who owns the medical system and the school system, tied to Bill and Melinda Gates. He did the mass deworming programs to help assist society and then vaccinate them as well too. And somebody's gonna say, well, I have parasites. Really, you have a heavy metal overload is what you have. See that? Parasites have an accumulation indicator of heavy metal overload. Parasites suck toxins from the body and respond to pollution. Google doesn't want you to know that. But what Google does want you to do is take pharmaceuticals. Johnson and Johnson, Bayer, Merck, they create the ivermectin, the fenbendazole, the mebendazole, all of this garbage. They also create the vaccines too. It also gets deeper when you find out the animal dewormer sold by the veterinarians. Same companies, poisoning the animals causing blindness and infertility. And here's another example for you to learn about: mold and parasites eat heavy metals. Yes. Candida, mold, parasites eat the toxic metals in your body to keep you alive. And if we take it a step further, this is an image of a parasite on grass. This is the Rockefellers telling people not to step on grass because those little specks of dust are gonna get you. Do you see how they deflect everything? So let's hit on some censored solutions. Yes, detoxing is censored. So, chilogyon, you can do tree sap like dragon's blood, you can do salts like borax, you can do raw meat, big rabbit hole right there, lymphatic massage, moldy berries, organic moldy berries pull the metals out of the body, so does raw unpasteurized cream. Tamarind paste, papaya seeds, you know why everything's seedless. And then the last one's wormwood, which everybody takes to detox the heavy metals out of their body. So that's all I just wanna hit on today and good luck on the giveaway.

Where does any synthetic molecule serve the living? They don't. Medicine by definition contains synthetic molecules, registered, patented, and put into the market as a medicine. A quadrillion dollar enterprise is at work amongst us decimating the human family intentionally, using synthetic molecules which by design are cancer aids. It's for purpose of sterilization and population control. There's too many people on the planet we need to get rid of. In the words of Bill Gates, at least three billion people need to die. So we'll start off in Africa and eliminate most of the Africans because they're deplorable. Multilateral agencies and the health and regulatory authorities appear to have become weaponized and appear to be working in collusion against the living men and women of the soil. It is. It's not a bacterial war. It's a systemic poisoning war. And they're using chemical warfare against all of us.

The speaker discusses Ivermectin, a Merck product, and its ingredients, including benzo alcohol, glycols, and polysorbate 80, which is also used in vaccines to help heavy metals cross the blood-brain barrier. Propylene glycol, also found in antifreeze, is another ingredient. The speaker claims parasites accumulate due to heavy metal pollution, and while Ivermectin may kill the worms, it doesn't address the underlying heavy metal issue. The speaker alleges the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has rights to Ivermectin pills. The speaker suggests using natural foods like pumpkin seeds, papaya seeds, beets, carrots, and dragon's blood to remove heavy metals from the body instead of funding big pharma.

Synthetic molecules do not serve the living. Medicines, by definition, contain synthetic molecules. A quadrillion-dollar enterprise is decimating the human family intentionally, using synthetic molecules which are, by design, cancer aids. This is for sterilization and population control because there are too many people on the planet. Bill Gates believes at least three billion people need to die, starting in Africa, because Africans are deplorable and worthless. Multilateral agencies and health authorities appear to be weaponized and working in collusion against living people. It is not a bacterial war, but a systemic poisoning war, using chemical warfare against everyone.

The speaker discusses peptides and their rise in popularity on social media, describing them as big pharma products. They claim peptides are essentially the same as big pharma vitamins, just in injectable form, and assert that people are now supporting the same pharmaceutical companies by using peptides rather than taking vaccines. The speaker expresses astonishment that, after 2020, people would inject things into their bodies without knowing what they are putting in, yet peptide injections have become a trending topic across the Internet and social media. They extend the critique to other substances, stating that methylane blue, ivermectin, and nicotine are also part of the same pattern: if something is trendy on social media, it is backed by big pharma. The speaker asserts that this is what is happening with peptides and that big pharma maintains powerful marketing to influence public perception. They claim that big pharma gets people to believe in certain products and to ignore other concerns, such as “cell phone towers out in front of their house,” while encouraging them to jump on the bandwagon of other products to put into their body. The speaker argues that peptides represent a broader phenomenon where trendy health products are promoted by big pharma, similar to the way vaccines were promoted in 2020. They state that after 2020, one would think people would avoid injecting anything into their body because they don’t know what they are putting into it, yet the trend continues with peptides and related products. The overall assertion is that big pharma has strong marketing that convinces people to adopt various products and to overlook potential concerns, shaping consumer behavior through trends on social media. The speaker notes that the peptide trend is part of this larger pattern, alongside other substances like methylane blue, ivermectin, and nicotine, all of which are implied to be backed by big pharma when they gain online popularity.

Speaker 0: Ivermectin is owned by Merck. Merck created the first vaccine. Anything ivermectin, I wouldn't be touching any of that stuff. Here's the thing. If they didn't get you with the vaccine, they're getting you with ivermectin. You're still funding big pharma either way. Like, you're still giving money to big pharma. You might not be taking the vaccine, but you're giving money to pharma on the other side, which would be ivermectin. So they're getting you either way. They're putting in graphene oxide in both of those. Think about it. Like they know exactly what they're doing. It's a $30,000,000,000 business. Parasites is a $30,000,000,000 business. $30,000,000,000. They're not gonna tell you to eat some papaya seeds. They're not gonna tell you to cleanse the heavy metals. They're not gonna tell you to do a little dragon's blood or some turpentine. They're going to sell you the solution which comes with x y z side effects. Keeps big

One question for me. Where does any synthetic molecule serve the living? They don't. And am I right in suggesting that a medicine by definition is something which contains synthetic molecules, something that that is registered, patented, and put into the market as a medicine? Absolutely. a quadrillion dollar enterprise is at work amongst us decimating, culling the human family. Intentionally. Intentionally, using synthetic molecules, which by design are cancer aids, all of them. It's so for purpose of sterilization and population control. There's too many people on the planet we need to get rid of. In the words of Bill Gates, at least three billion people need to die. It is. It's not a bacterial war. It's a systemic poisoning war. And they're using chemical warfare against all of us.

The speakers discuss the politicization of Ivermectin, an antiparasitic drug that also shows potential in stopping viral replication. They mention its success in treating yellow fever and winning the Nobel Prize. They express confusion over why a drug would be demonized and politicized. The conversation touches on the motivations behind this, including the desire to create a monopoly for vaccines and the Emergency Use Authorization Act. They highlight the affordability and accessibility of Ivermectin, which can be manufactured by anyone and costs only 7¢ per dose. The speakers also mention the discouragement and suppression of alternative treatments like monoclonal antibodies.

Two hundred congresspeople have been treated with ivermectin for COVID. I did not know that. You could probably find it on doctor Pierre Corey’s Twitter page. Before there were vaccines, this was a common treatment, an off-label treatment for COVID. I do not know what the motivation for demonizing this particular medication is. Again, I’m not a doctor, and I’m not a scientist. But I would imagine some of it has to do with money. The reason being is that it is a generic drug now. They’ve the patent has run out. So anybody can make it, and it’s worth, like, 30¢ a dose.

- Speaker 0 highlights “the most popular trends on social media sponsored by Big Pharma” and claims “it's all made by Big Pharma.” - It cites “Ivermectin drug induced liver injury causing liver failure, blindness, and infertility.” - It mentions “the nicotine push,” allegedly “backed by big pharma,” and references “peptides, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, same ones who make vaccines.” - It references “Bill Gates” and “Rockefeller,” including “Muppets turning their tongues blue, methylene blue, John D. Rockefeller, product of chemotherapy and synthetic dyes.” - It asserts “Rockefeller's and the vitamins the pharmaceutical industry and the government pushing the pharmaceutical vitamins.” - It mentions “global vaccination programs,” by “the same people who make all the products I just mentioned” who “also wanna globally vaccinate and depopulate the world.” - It ends urging reading “Murder by Injection, keyword murder, by Eustace Mullins” as “the most important book you're ever gonna read so you can understand what we're living in of the monopoly of the medical system and how it controls all these other systems and then sells it back to the people without them knowing.”

- Today, we're gonna hit a deep dive on parasites and propaganda by John D. Rockefeller and the connection of ivermectin and methylene blue. - It's all planned. - They use a PCR test to find out you have parasites, honestly. - Propaganda became so large that John D. Rockefeller got together with Bill and Melinda Gates and all the pharmaceutical companies to get people on dewormers. - Then it gets deeper when you find a global vaccination plan with the Rockefellers and all the same companies that are making the parasite pills. - And this is where it all ties back to methylene blue, an insecticide, a dye that's linked to CNS toxicity and was used to stain the parasites and find them. - If parasites are real, they are an indicator of heavy metal pollution.

Rockefellers own the medical system and produce ivermectin with all their companies, trickling it down to others and selling in other countries—it's the same thing. It's a monopoly; we literally live in the game monopoly. After posting ivermectin-toxicity, viewers asked who I'm paid by, but the speaker says it's a pharmaceutical product and they are not paid by anybody. They caution that if you're still using pharmaceuticals after 2020, you should check yourself, referencing mask-wearing and sticker policies as part of what happened. Vitamins are described as synthetic, fake, and made in a lab, and peptides as made in a lab. The speaker concludes: Eat from food. That's what we're supposed to do.

The discussion centers on ivermectin and various claims about its origins, promotion, and effects. One speaker asserts that ivermectin is made by big pharma, specifically naming Merck and vaccine companies, and that people are using it because influencers told the public to take pharmaceutical pills after the pandemic, while not disclosing that cell phone towers are in front of their houses. The speaker claims that people took ivermectin instead, and states that ivermectin is linked to liver toxicity, jaundice, brain damage, and infertility, suggesting these risks are part of a broader strategy to reduce fertility in the population. The other speaker counters by describing ivermectin as having productive toxicity, noting this is observed in animal studies, including rabbits and other mammals, and rejecting the idea that its toxicity is limited to arthropods like crabs or cockroaches. This speaker claims it is a well-proven reproductive toxic substance for many mammals. They reference another video discussing the neurotoxic effect of ivermectin and mention that veterinarians discuss routine use and continued use of ivermectin, associating it with various adverse outcomes.

Methylene blue is a synthetic dye used in chemotherapy and is controlled by Bayer, a company owned by the Federal Reserve, Rothschilds, and Rockefellers. The Rockefeller Institute owns the American Cancer Society and the entire medical system since the Flexner Report. Methylene blue can cause dopamine and serotonin overload. Cancer is diagnosed with a PCR test, which is also used to fake things. Eustace Mullins' book, "Murder by Injection," discusses the Rockefellers' and Rothschilds' monopoly of the medical system since the 1900s. The speaker recommends natural alternatives like lion's mane and blue spirulina to boost energy and brain function instead of funding big pharma, which they believe is trying to cause harm.

Speaker claims ivermectin is part of a diabolical Rockefeller plan devised in 2010, predicting people would reject vaccines after 2020 and turn to another pharmaceutical. They question ivermectin’s safety by listing side effects such as blindness, liver failure, and infertility. They argue the Rockefellers own the entire medical system worldwide, so buying from a different country is ineffective. The discussion notes ads for pharmaceuticals on alternative-health platforms, suggesting a marketing push. They say parasites are really heavy metals in the body, and that ivermectin contains heavy metals. The claim is that ivermectin, like antibiotics, suppresses symptoms. They describe a $32,000,000,000 industry fueled by this narrative, and when they researched producers, they found Merck, Johnson and Johnson, Pfizer, and Bayer. The same companies making vaccines in 2020 allegedly also make ivermectin, framing it as a bait-and-switch.

The speaker claims both vaccines and ivermectin fund big pharma, starting with a "graphene oxide rabbit hole" from 2015. Manufacturers of both include Bayer, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Merck, Pfizer, and Johnson and Johnson. The speaker alleges ivermectin and injections share ingredients that break down the blood-brain barrier. The Rockefeller Foundation, funded by the Rothschilds, owns the entire medical system, according to a document removed from Google and research by Eustace Mullins. For "parasites," which are supposedly heavy metal overloads, the speaker suggests alternatives like dragon's blood, pumpkin seeds, papaya seeds, fasting, borax, baking soda, turpentine, chili shots, cilantro, wormwood, or black walnut to remove heavy metals instead of funding big pharma. The speaker believes that funding big pharma perpetuates a harmful cycle.

Ivermectin, a Nobel Prize-winning anti-parasitic drug, has been vilified. Merck, who held the patent until 1996, claims it doesn't work for COVID-19. However, Merck has a 50/50 partnership with Moderna on mRNA cancer vaccines. Because Merck will make billions on mRNA cancer vaccines, they have no interest in investigating ivermectin for cancer. There is evidence that high-dose ivermectin is effective in treating many types of cancers.

The speaker discusses Ivermectin, a Merck product, and its ingredients, including benzyl alcohol, glycols, and polysorbate 80, which is also used in vaccines to help heavy metals cross the blood-brain barrier. Propylene glycol, also found in antifreeze, is another ingredient. The speaker claims parasites accumulate due to heavy metal pollution, and while Ivermectin may kill the worms, it doesn't address the underlying heavy metal issue. The speaker states that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has rights to these pills. The speaker suggests using natural foods like pumpkin seeds, papaya seeds, beets, carrots, and dragon's blood to remove heavy metals from the body instead of funding Big Pharma.

Speaker 0 summarizes a narrative connecting vaccines and IV ivermectin to funding for big pharma, beginning with a supposed graphene oxide rabbit hole dating back to February 2015. The speaker lists manufacturers associated with these products: Bayer, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Merck, Pfizer, and Johnson & Johnson, noting familiarity with these brands from 2020. The speaker highlights a date associated with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and claims that the foundation is linked to the discussed issue. The argument continues by pointing to ingredients claimed to be common between injections and pills, described as the same substances used to break down the blood-brain barrier, and asserts that these ingredients poison people. The speaker poses the question of who planned all of this and asserts that the Rockefeller Foundation funds, and is funded by, the Rothschilds, owning the entire medical system. A referenced document is said to have been removed from Google, and the claim is reinforced by referencing Eustace Mullins as providing deeper detail on the topic. In addressing solutions, the speaker shifts to concerns about heavy metal overload and parasites, offering a list of remedies: dragon’s blood, pumpkin seeds, papaya seeds, fasting, borax, baking soda, turpentine from the pine tree, a chili shot, cilantro, wormwood, and black walnut. The recommended approach is to pull heavy metals out rather than continuing to fund big pharma, with the speaker suggesting that the cycle benefits all sides and may perpetuate itself if unaddressed.

The FDA issues emergency use authorization for medical products when there are no approved alternatives. The effectiveness of Ivermectin as a treatment is questioned, as it would have affected the authorization of vaccines. Powerful forces with financial interests oppose Ivermectin, as it threatens global vaccination policies. Pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer, BioNTech, and Moderna have made significant profits from COVID-19 vaccines. Ivermectin is a cheap and widely available drug, but its safety is disputed by Merck, despite distributing it when it was under patent. It is important to be cautious of articles that may be biased or paid for.

The speaker discusses the vaccine and IV mectin, claiming both fund big pharma. They allege a connection to a "graphene oxide rabbit hole" dating back to 2015. Manufacturers like Bayer, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Merck, Pfizer, and Johnson & Johnson are mentioned. The speaker claims IV mectin and injections share the same ingredients, which allegedly break down the blood-brain barrier. They state the Rockefeller Foundation, funded by the Rothschilds, owns the entire medical system, referencing a document removed from Google and a book by Eustace Mullins. The speaker suggests that parasites are actually heavy metal overloads and recommends solutions like dragon's blood, pumpkin seeds, papaya seeds, fasting, borax, baking soda, turpentine, chili shots, cilantro, wormwood, or black walnut to remove heavy metals instead of funding big pharma.

The speakers discuss the exposure of mainstream media and how it tries to dismiss and discredit them. They mention the framing of Ivermectin as horse medicine and find it amusing. They clarify that they took Ivermectin based on the judgment of a medical professional and list other medications they used for COVID treatment. They mention that 200 congresspeople have also been treated with Ivermectin. They speculate that the demonization of Ivermectin may be motivated by financial interests since it is a generic drug. The video ends with the information that Ivermectin costs around 30¢ per dose.

Speaker 0: Polysorbate eighty opens up the blood brain barrier so that mercury, formaldehyde, and all the other chemicals can pass into the blood brain barrier. You are 100% correct. Polysorbate eighty is the same ingredient they put in ivermectin. So when all these people are like, oh, I didn't get the vaccine, but I'm taking ivermectin. You're taking the same toxic chemical that allows chemicals to break down your blood brain barrier and mess up your body. It's in both ones. It's in the vaccines and it's in ivermectin. And if you go through the whole ingredient list of ivermectin, it's quite a rabbit hole because that's also a pharmaceutical product. You know, when you get into operation lockstep, which was done by the Rockefellers, they said that a solution would roll out that people would get poisoned with. Well, ivermectin is that. You look into the toxicity of ivermectin and it's quite a rabbit hole. That's for sure. All these people having kidney failure, liver failure, all because they're trying to take some solution when they could have just ate some organic papaya seeds. That's it.

The speaker believes that Ivermectin's effectiveness threatened the emergency use authorization for vaccines, which would impact the global market worth over $100 billion. The speaker suggests that Ivermectin's low cost and availability posed a threat to patented pharmaceuticals like PAXLOVID and Molnupiravir. They argue that Ivermectin could have ended the pandemic if widely used, but was suppressed due to its potential impact on the market. Translation: The speaker suggests that Ivermectin's effectiveness posed a threat to the emergency use authorization for vaccines and the global market, potentially impacting billions in revenue. They argue that Ivermectin's affordability and availability could have ended the pandemic if widely used, but was suppressed due to its potential impact on the market.

The speaker discusses pro powder and compares it to common magnesium supplements. The speaker asserts that pro powder provides minerals in natural forms, listing magnesium, selenium, iodine, glutathione, and calcium as examples, described as "natural forms" and "beautiful minerals which are very beneficial." In contrast, the speaker identifies several synthetic forms of magnesium—magnesium carbonate, magnesium glycinate, and magnesium oxide—and emphasizes that these are synthetic rather than natural. Beyond the mineral forms, the speaker notes a broader claim about the production of nutrients. It is stated that the same companies manufacture a wide range of products, including magnesium, vitamin C, vitamin B12, vitamin D, vitamin K, as well as protein products like creatine and whey protein. The speaker asserts that all of these items are produced by the same companies, implying a centralized or consolidated manufacturing sector. A controversial implication is raised regarding who controls the vitamin and supplement industry. The speaker singles out the Rockefellers as the entity responsible for making “the vitamins,” suggesting a powerful or shadowy influence over what is produced. This claim is presented as a factual assertion about the industry’s origins and control. Overall, the speaker contrasts natural, mineral-rich formulations with synthetic magnesium forms and highlights a perceived link between major supplement production through a single set of companies. The discussion frames pro powder as a natural alternative that includes multiple minerals and compounds in natural forms, while characterizing many widely used supplements as synthetic and part of a centralized manufacturing network allegedly led by the Rockefellers.