reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Fulton County, Georgia admits in a consent decree that 3,600 ballots were duplicated, with 36 batches involved. This raises concerns about potential wrongdoing. We eagerly await further information and facts to emerge. It marks the start of a significant period in the ongoing voter situation.

The speaker discusses the upcoming May 7th state election board hearing regarding the investigation into the 2020 election count in Fulton County, Georgia. They touch on the board's authority to investigate the secretary of state and express a desire to meet with Gabriel Sterling to discuss recount errors. The speaker emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability in election processes.

The speakers discuss the redaction process for absentee ballot envelopes and the use of the BlueCrest sorting and signature verification machine. It is revealed that the machine was not operational and the envelopes were not scanned for signature verification. The request for scanned images of the envelopes is denied as they were never scanned to begin with. The speakers express concern about the lack of verification and the potential impact on the case. The subpoena requests are left unresolved.

Many Georgia counties have failed to provide electronic ballot images from the 2020 election, with as many as 74 counties admitting to destroying these records. Legal action is being considered due to violations of federal and state law, as well as obstruction of open records requests by over a dozen counties. The possibility of two separate lawsuits arising from these issues is being discussed.

The speaker explains that they filed a complaint with the Inspector General against the Georgia Secretary of State. They believe that the hand count of ballots was altered and intentionally entered to match the machine count. The speaker also mentions that evidence of the hand count being incorrect was concealed during a hearing. They filed a second fraud report with the Attorney General, who also buried the evidence. As a result, the speaker has turned to the Inspector General to investigate the concealment of evidence.

The speaker discusses the issue of bleed through on ballots and its potential impact on voting. They mention that if the bubbles on the ballot bleed through, it can cause an overvote or result in voting for a different candidate than intended. They refer to a newsletter from Maricopa County stating that they use VoteSecure paper, which is thick and has a special coating to prevent bleed through. However, the speaker points out that they have observed bleed through on actual ballots, which raises concerns. They mention the need for further analysis to determine the extent of the impact on votes. The second speaker seeks clarification and confirms that Maricopa County's newsletter stated they only use secure paper that does not allow bleed through. The first speaker affirms this and adds that paper experts have confirmed the thickness of the paper should prevent bleed through, but they have observed thin paper stock being used on Election Day.

Governor Kemp is being challenged to prove the fairness of the election. The speaker suggests unsealing 150,000 mail-in ballots stored in a Fulton County warehouse for three and a half years. They claim that six affidavits state that 30,000 of these ballots were fake and ran through a scanner at night. The speaker urges the governor to order a forensic audit of these ballots, as they allegedly show signs of fraud. They argue that if the governor truly believes the election was fair, he should take this step. However, the speaker doubts that the governor will do so.

There are concerns about duplicate ballots in the audit. The speaker mentions that there should be a lower count due to duplicates, but they are not seeing any reference to duplicates in the forms. Speaker 1 explains that duplicate ballots are created when the original ballot is damaged and cannot be processed. These duplicates should have a matching 6-digit serial number with the original damaged ballot, but they cannot find the matching originals. Speaker 2 confirms this, stating that they are finding duplicate ballots without corresponding serial numbers on the damaged originals. They are struggling to match the duplicated ballots with the missing originals.

We subpoenaed Fulton County for 518,000 ballot images from the recount, not from election day. There are 380,761 missing ballot images from election day. Fulton County has not provided an explanation for this discrepancy. It is important for every vote to have a corresponding ballot image. Translation: We requested ballot images from Fulton County for the recount, not for election day. There are 380,761 missing ballot images from election day that have not been explained. It is crucial that every vote has a corresponding ballot image.

The speaker asks who determined the number of failed signatures in the 2020 election. Speaker 1 explains that their organization reviewed a quarter of the 1,900,000 envelopes from the election using 150 trained workers. They followed the guidelines in the secretary of state manual and analyzed each voter record individually. The statistics from the first 25% of the ballots were extrapolated to determine the final number, which is specific to Maricopa County. Speaker 0 acknowledges that Maricopa County alone had over 2 million ballots, with about 1.9 million of them being mail-in ballots. Speaker 1 confirms this and the conversation continues.

The speaker mentions the history of elections in Fulton County, Georgia. Another speaker brings up an interesting incident during a 99% audit on signatures. They found that many ballots did not have the required red initials, indicating approval. Once separated from the outer envelope, these ballots still had to be counted. This poses a problem as it undermines the accuracy of the audit. The speaker expresses concern about the lack of proper examination for dozens of ballots on Saturday. The conversation concludes with a thank you to Miss Fisher.

In the exchange, concerns are raised about mail-in ballots in Allegheny and Philadelphia counties and how they were counted. Speaker 0 notes that ballots were counted without observers, citing 682,770 ballots observed and asking about the 1,823,148 mailed-out ballots, contrasted with a final count showing 2,589,242 mail-in ballots. The core question is: what explains the roughly 700,000 mail-in ballots that “appeared from nowhere”? Speaker 1 responds that their cyber team uses white-hat hacking techniques to gather publicly available information from the secretary of state’s website, which has been updated as late as 11:16 this morning with provisional and mail-in ballots, though those numbers continue to change. He adds that the 2,500,000 figure is no longer on the website, and it has “just been taken off.” There is no annotation explaining why. Speaker 2 then describes an on-the-ground observation: a deputy sheriff, a senior law enforcement officer, was seen not being observed and walking in with baggies, with USBs being inserted into machines. The witness claims to have personally witnessed this 24 times, with additional witnesses including Democrat poll watchers. They were told by an attorney that every election leaves a couple of USB cards in the voting machines to be brought back by the warehouse manager, but this account is contradicted by law enforcement and other officials. The witness states that 47 USB cards are missing and “they’re nowhere to be found,” and that 32 to 30 cards uploaded were not present in the live vote update. The witness demanded timely live upload of vote results, which showed 50,000 votes; they assert those votes were for Vice President Biden, though they note that identifying who those votes were for should not matter to a computer scientist. Speaker 1 emphasizes that forensic evidence from the computers was not obtained: the procedure would involve turning off the computer, imaging the drive with BitLocker, under law enforcement observation, which would take about an hour for five machines. This forensic imaging was never performed, despite objections three weeks earlier. They later learned that virtually all chain-of-custody logs, yellow sheets, and forensic records in Delaware County were gone; a signing party attempted to recreate the logs with poll workers but was unsuccessful in recovering them all. The discussion concludes with a claim that there are 100,000 to 120,000 ballots, both mail-in and USB, in question, and that there is no remedy or “cure” within the local charter for certifying a presidential vote, leaving the speaker asserting that nobody could certify the vote in good conscience.

The investigation confirms 380,761 missing ballot images from election day. Fulton County was subpoenaed for recount images, not election day ones. It's unclear why the election day images are missing. Fulton County should ensure every vote has a corresponding ballot image. Translation: The investigation found 380,761 missing ballot images from election day. Fulton County was asked for recount images, not those from election day. The reason for the missing images is unknown. Fulton County should ensure that every vote has a corresponding ballot image.

The investigation confirms missing ballot images - 380,761 from election day not available. Subpoenaed 518,000 ballot images from Fulton County for recount, not election day. Fulton County does not have images for 380,761 election day ballots. County does not know why. Should every vote have a ballot image?

Fulton County, Georgia admits in a consent decree that 3,600 ballots were duplicated, with 36 batches involved. This raises concerns about potential wrongdoing. We eagerly await further information on this matter, as it marks the start of a significant period. The scale of voter impact is substantial.

I spoke to law enforcement agencies, urging them to collect forensic evidence from computers to prove or refute election fraud claims. Despite my requests, the evidence was not gathered. Chain of custody logs and records in Delaware County are missing, making 100,000+ ballots questionable. There is no remedy for this situation, which could impact the presidential election certification.

The investigation confirms that there are missing ballot images. Specifically, 380,761 ballot images from the election day machine count are not available. We subpoenaed Fulton County for all ballot images and received about 518,000, but these pertain to the recount, not the election day count. Thus, the missing images are a result of the focus on the recount rather than the original election day data.

The video discusses issues with the Fulton County case, specifically regarding the lack of signature verification. It highlights discrepancies in the handling of ballots and equipment purchases that were not utilized. The speakers express disbelief at the inefficiencies and potential fraud in the election process. The transcript emphasizes the need for proper verification procedures and questions the validity of the Georgia election certification.

A motion was made to subpoena the clerk of the court for multiple documents from the November 2020 election, including consolidated return sheets, opening and closing scanner tapes, daily recap of advanced in person polling place scanners, pull pad recap sheets, absentee ballot recap sheets, electronic files, including ballot images, log files, and tabulation files, a numbered voter list, absentee numbered list of voters, absentee ballot envelopes, security verification forms, and chain of custody forms of the poll manager and technician. The motion also requests that Fulton County appear at the next meeting. The motion was seconded. One member stated the requested documents have nothing to do with the monitoring, while another stated it has to do with the same case. Despite advisement from the attorney general, a member thinks they should proceed with the motion. A vote was held, with results of three ayes and two nays, and the motion carried.

- The discussion centers on Fulton County’s ballot-seizure case and the implication that the affidavit relied on was built from recycled conspiracy theories by a known conspiracy figure. It is asserted that the judge was not told these issues had already been relitigated, and that the administration appears intent on applying the same approach elsewhere. - Question raised: can these efforts be stopped, given the underlying pattern and what the other side is pursuing? And what is their plan for 2026 if they lack the 2020 conspiracies to lean on? - Jen notes her role as counsel in the Fulton County matter and declines to comment further on the specifics. - Jessica forecasts that Trump-aligned actors will pull out 2020 ballots and photos, arguing that the numbers don’t add up and that the machines were faulty and the people fudged because, allegedly, in Fulton County they did. She emphasizes that there is no evidence that the irregularities would have changed the outcome in Georgia, but acknowledges there were thousands of irregularities, with records destroyed and chain-of-custody issues, and that the recount and audit were of poor quality. She warns that in 2026 the same approach could be used again with untrustworthy machines and flawed audits, and warns that even if actual facts are shown, they would highlight known errors. - Marilyn adds the point that a Barack Obama-appointee judge confirmed the unreliability of the machines and notes a demonstrator at DEFCON Voting Village showed how easily a Dominion machine can be hacked. She cites a view that Biden still won Georgia, despite the “fudged audits,” and argues that the intent behind the questionable procedures was to obscure errors. - Jessica identifies Raffensperger as the official who chose the machines and funded the expansive spending on them, suggesting he did not want critical issues to be exposed. She asserts that the process was designed to avoid scrutiny and that the results were obtained by running ballots through the machine multiple times to adjust numbers, including using test ballots to influence results. - The conversation concludes with a focus on the importance of recounts and audits, and the need for a transparent process in 2026. Jessica argues that Georgia’s issues stemmed from an audit with bogus processes and a recount conducted through machines rather than a hand count at counting tables with observers from both campaigns and the clerk. She asserts that the transparency of the counting process could have mitigated much of the controversy and that the lesson for 2026 is to implement a transparent system.

The discussion concerns a motion to subpoena documents related to the 2020 election. The attorney general has advised on the case. Member Johnson moves to subpoena the clerk of the court for multiple documents from the November 2020 election, including consolidated return sheets, opening and closing scanner tapes, daily recap of advanced in-person polling place scanners, pull pad recap sheets, absentee ballot recap sheets, electronic files including ballot images, log files, and tabulation files, a numbered voter list, absentee numbered list of voters, absentee ballot envelopes, security verification forms, and chain of custody forms of the poll manager and technician. Additionally, they request that Fulton County appear at the next meeting. The motion is seconded. A vote is held, with members Giselle and the chairman voting nay, and members Johnson, Jeffries, and King voting aye. The motion carries 3 to 2.

I want to find missing documents for proper vote counting in Fulton County. We couldn't find ballot images but have the ballots. Someone is preventing access to paper ballots. I'm focused on data and numbers.

In Fulton County, Georgia, it has been acknowledged that 3,600 individual ballots were duplicated, with 36 batches being duplicated. This raises concerns about potential wrongdoing. We eagerly await the release of more information and facts regarding this matter, as it marks the start of a significant period. The voter integrity is at stake.

This week on Straight to the Point, Harmit Dillon, Assistant Attorney General of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, discusses a federal investigation into what she calls an attack on a Minnesota church, detailing charges and potential future arrests. Key points on the Minnesota church protest and related federal charges: - The 14-page indictment centers on violations of the FACE Act, which criminalizes disrupting a religious service or invading a house of worship, and also covers abortion clinics and crisis pregnancy centers. The case includes conspiracy to violate federal civil rights in connection with these offenses. - The accusation describes a two-stage attack rather than a simple protest: a first wave of participants, primarily white allies, sat in pews to appear as a church service, followed by a second wave that disrupted the sermon and caused fear among congregants. - The church scene included statements like “this isn’t God’s house, this is the house of the devil.” Nine individuals have been indicted so far; prosecutors say the broader group involved could number about 40 based on video evidence. - The DOJ is pursuing all individuals who invaded the church with the intent to disrupt prayer and deprive parishioners of First Amendment rights. Some suspects claimed to be journalists, though the government notes the content shows pregame activities, tailgating with donuts and coffee, and coordinated actions that support a conspiracy theory. Reaction to media and journalists: - Don Lemon’s remarks on late-night TV about overreach are addressed. Dillon emphasizes that the mic and camera do not grant a license to break the law, and prosecutors have pursued arrests with search warrants and evidence, while acknowledging that journalism status is not decisive in determining liability in this case. - The DOJ references specific individuals who claimed journalism status, noting that several arrested individuals made such claims. Investigations, scope, and law-enforcement context: - Dillon states the DOJ is examining all participants who invaded the church; the universe could extend beyond the nine indicted to roughly 40 people based on the video evidence. - The incident raised safety concerns for law enforcement and parishioners; she cites prior related church attacks and a fatal shooting at a Minneapolis Catholic church as context for a zero-tolerance stance on disrupting houses of worship. Other ongoing civil rights matters: - A separate civil rights review into the January shooting death of ICU nurse Alex Preti by Homeland Security agents is mentioned. The process involves evidence preservation, ballistic analysis, and collaboration with the FBI and DHS; it remains general and non-specific about current investigative steps. Anti-ICE activism and security measures: - Reports of anti-ICE activists setting up roadblocks and using license plate readers are described as a criminal matter—obstruction of federal law enforcement—and are framed against broader safety concerns for federal agents facing threats. - Tom Holman’s push to deploy full body cameras for Homeland Security agents, starting with ICE, is welcomed as a transparency measure to protect civil rights and assess potential violations. Georgia 2020 election ballots and civil/criminal proceedings: - Dillon outlines a timeline of two tracks: a civil suit to obtain Georgia’s voter rolls for a comprehensive review, and a parallel criminal investigation operation leading to a search warrant at an election hub in Fulton County. - The civil case sought ballots because of concerns about irregularities in Fulton County processing; the criminal case took precedence due to implications for Fifth Amendment rights and ongoing investigations. - There is mention of ongoing debates about the handling of ballots, with some Georgia officials acknowledging mishandling, though not framed as systemic fraud; the department may seek ballots in other swing states if appropriate, subject to legal preservation periods and evolving facts. - The timeline hints at potential action ahead of the midterms, with involvement from DNI Tulsi Gabbard on election-security matters. The interview emphasizes that the indictment details a wide-ranging, premeditated conspiracy to disrupt a church service, the DOJ’s commitment to pursuing all involved, and the broader context of civil rights investigations related to use of force, protest rights, and election integrity.

We asked Fulton County for all ballot images, but only received about 518,000 for the recount, not the 380,761 from election day. The focus was on the recount, not the original election. It's unclear why the election day images are missing. Shouldn't every vote have a valid image?