reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Usury, or lending money at interest, was historically illegal in Christian nations, leading to Jewish individuals filling that role. Over generations, this resulted in significant economic power for Jews, prompting kings to expel them repeatedly. This cycle of exclusion occurred across various countries for centuries, contributing to the Jewish diaspora. Napoleon highlighted the dangers of compound interest, suggesting it could lead to widespread property loss. Today, debt slavery has replaced traditional forms of slavery, with credit card debt and student loans binding individuals financially. Pareto's principle observed that a small percentage of families owned most of the land, coinciding with the rise of modern banking in Italy.

The financial system is the root of control, enslaving people through debt like mortgages. Those with power use money to manipulate and buy influence, rewarding the corrupt and punishing the morally upright. This system benefits those without morals, who are easily compromised. In a world run by psychopaths, power is maintained by ensuring all in positions of influence are compromised.

In the past, slavery was physical, but now it's debt slavery where money must be paid back with interest. Pareto's principle, originating in Italy, shows that 80% of land is owned by 20% of families. Modern banking began in Italy with gold exchanged for notes by the Jewish population. The formula "time times compound interest equals power" emphasizes the power of compounding numbers over time. Investing for 30 years with compounding numbers can lead to significant growth.

All three Abrahamic religions initially considered charging interest as immoral, but over time, usury became more accepted in Western society. Fractional reserve banking allows banks to create money out of thin air and charge interest on loans. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and the Emergency Banking Act of 1933 further increased debt, while the banking cartel funded both World Wars. The US turned to its military and the petrodollar to maintain world reserve currency status. However, this Ponzi scheme is collapsing, with crashing markets and a quadrillion-dollar derivatives market. The banking cartel aims to convert everyone to an authoritarian CBDC, but without trust, they will face challenges. Hard times are approaching, and it is suggested to prepare and create a banking system that serves the people.

All three Abrahamic religions initially considered charging interest (usury) as immoral, but over time, it became more accepted in Western society. Fractional reserve banking allows banks to create money out of thin air and charge interest on loans. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and subsequent events led to the US printing money beyond its gold reserves. To maintain world reserve currency status, the US relied on its military and engaged in wars. The current financial system is compared to a Ponzi scheme, with the markets crashing and the derivatives market being worth more than the world's financial assets. The speaker suggests that the collapse of this system will result in the loss of money in banks and calls for a banking system that serves the people.

Rothschild, a man who claimed to be Jewish, controlled the families by sending his sons to different parts of Europe. They established central banks in England, France, Italy, Austria, and the US. The Rothschilds manipulated money and financed both sides of wars, including the American Civil War. They owned slaves, which contributed to their wealth. Abraham Lincoln's interference threatened their interests. The Rothschilds profited from wars, while poor idealists fought for noble principles, unaware of the manipulation. The rich became richer at the expense of the bloodshed of others.

Early Roman Jews engaged in crafts, trade, and money lending, sometimes at high interest rates. Despite expulsions, their presence as usurers grew, contributing to the empire's decline. Julius Caesar combatted usury by implementing social and monetary reforms, including debt reduction, regulation of interest rates, and wealth redistribution. These actions angered aristocrats who then assassinated him. The adoption of the gold standard led to financial instability due to gold scarcity and outflow to the East. Counterfeiting was severely punished. The church's accumulation of wealth via tithes further strained the economy, concentrating wealth and hindering circulation. Social injustice, excessive taxation, and a weak industrial base also contributed. The empire's collapse led to the Dark Ages and a deflationary depression. Factors included wealth concentration, lack of mining resources, and a decline in genetic value due to non-white slaves. The primary economic cause was an inadequate money supply and the treatment of money as a commodity. The transcript concludes that a dishonest economic system leads to dissolution, and a functional society requires debt-free currency issued by the state.

Who runs most financial institutions? There's a perception that Jews dominate banking and law, which has led to accusations of anti-Semitism. A Jewish banker friend, Mari, shared that members of his community can access zero-interest loans in the U.S., a benefit I find deeply unfair since I pay interest on my loans as a venture capitalist. This raises questions about religious doctrines favoring one group over others. To qualify for these loans, one must be Jewish, as lineage matters—only those with a Jewish mother can claim this benefit. Hebrew free loans are available to Jewish individuals, while Gentiles do not receive the same opportunity. This disparity is surprising and highlights a significant financial advantage for one community.

In Christian nations, lending money for interest was illegal, so Jews became the lenders. They charged interest and eventually owned everything. Kings would then round them up and kick them out of the country. This cycle repeated for centuries, as Jews would go to the next country and start lending again. Compound interest was seen as a powerful force that could enslave people, which is why it was illegal. Today, credit card and student loan interest continue to enslave people. The start of modern banking in Italy saw 80% of the land owned by 20% of the families, with a significant Jewish population.

For 3300 years, our goal as Jewish people has been to control the world. We aim to alter Americans' perception of reality, using a slow, four-stage brainwashing process. Demoralization, the first stage, takes 15-20 years to erode values by exposing generations to enemy ideology. This is complete, even exceeding expectations due to declining moral standards. Compound interest, historically illegal and termed usury, led to Jews becoming moneylenders when Christians couldn't. Over generations, this led to economic control, resulting in expulsion. Compound interest enslaves people through debt. Jewish individuals are overrepresented in financial crimes. The Talmud permits cheating non-Jews. I'm telling the truth even if it sounds offensive to some. COVID responses were absurd. A small group controls information and money, but you can't name them without being called an anti-Semite.

In Christian nations, usury (charging interest) was illegal, leading Jews to dominate money lending. Kings would expel Jews for competing with central banks. Compound interest was feared for enslaving people. Debt, like credit card and student loan interest, is a modern form of slavery. Pareto's principle originated in Italy, where 80% of land was owned by 20% of families. Time multiplied by compound interest equals power in investing over 30 years.

In Christian nations, usury (charging interest) was illegal, so Jews became money lenders. Over time, they owned everything, leading to expulsion by kings. This cycle repeated for centuries, as kings feared Jews' financial power. Napoleon warned of compound interest's ability to consume property. Today, credit card and student loan interest enslave people, replacing physical slavery with debt slavery.

The year was 1871, and while the events of this year have been purposefully hidden from the masses, 1871 must never be forgotten. Much like Vatican City and the City Of London, Washington, D. C. Has its own sovereignty. Basically, D.C., City Of London, and Vatican City are totally separate territories from the nations in which they reside. Vatican City is technically enclaved within Rome, outfitted with its own special police force and political structure, the same way the City Of London is situated within the city called London, and it has its own flag, crest, police force, ceremonial armed forces, and a mayor. And sure, there are states within The United States that have their own constitution and distinctive flags, but I think most people you'd ask would know that Washington, D. C. Isn't a state. Most folks would tell you that Washington, D. C. Is where our laws are made, where our politicians congregate, and where our White House resides. But on the D. C. Flag, which is said to have been reflective of George Washington's coat of arms, there are three stars. And I wonder, are those stars representative of the three city states that exist as corporate entities outside of their respective nations? Vatican City, the religious hub, the city of London, the banking central, and Washington, D. C, the military leg of the empire. Being its own city state, DC has its own police force that shares a direct link with Congress, its own mayor, and its own set of laws. But our founding father certainly didn't set it up like this. So how did it come to be? The year was 1871. The US was going through a lot of turmoil. The nation was bankrupt and vulnerable after the civil war, and the London bankers, which included the notorious Rothschild family, were ready to make a deal with congress to remedy that turmoil. Turmoil, I might add, that is suspected that the bankers had a hand in creating in the first place. At any rate, these bankers made a lot of credit available in the aftermath of the civil war as a means to, one, fight Lincoln's greenback after he was murdered, with some theorizing that part of the motivation for his assassination came from his push to privatize the monetary system. The second reason that the bankers made so much credit available was to collect on the interest from those who desperately needed the money, which would be the United States government at the time. Now, this was nothing new, this was practice as old as time. Well, as old as Mystery Babylon. Not much has really changed since the days of Babylon, not the usury, not the debt slavery, not even the iconography. Passed by Congress, the Act of 1871 provided a government for the 10 mile parcel of land known as the District Of Columbia, allowing Washington, D. C. To act as a corporation outside of the original Constitution of The United States. So, okay, why does the Washington, D. C. Constitution have nothing to do with The United States constitution? Why exactly is Washington, D. C. Totally separate from the rest of The United States? Why does it need to be separate from The United States, as a separate territory at the epicenter of the Virgin Mary, tucked right between Virginia and Maryland? The Act of 1871 changed our country's founding fathers' original constitution for The United States for America to the constitution of The United States Of America. If you blink, you might miss it because it's a mixture of impactful wording and some weird capitalization thrown in there that pretty means nothing to the average person upon initial inspection. But these subtle changes are a huge deal in the realm of legislation. Compounded with these minor changes was clever marketing of the act as a way to unify the territorial government for the entire District of Columbia. The aforementioned are contributing factors as to how such a major act flew under the radar, ultimately overturning the United States Constitutional Republic. Since 1871, the federal government has usurped nearly all of the power that was formerly held in the hands of the people. But how on earth was Congress able to pass a separate constitution and incorporate The United States? A bunch of attorneys have contacted me about this subject, explaining it to me, thank you for everyone who's done that, but let me break it down to you in a way that won't make you just totally fall asleep. A corporation, by definition, is a legal entity from its owners. A corporation protects its owners from personal liability for corporate debts and obligations within limits. So was the Act of 1871 as harmless as some claim just an act to provide a government for the District Of Columbia and nothing more? We can answer that question by simply stepping back and taking a look at the dominoes that fell after this act was passed, and asking the question: Who benefited from this piece of legislation? Is the Act of 1871 the reason why Congress passed the sixteenth amendment, which allowed the federal government to tax individual personal income regardless of state population? Is the Act of 1871 the reason why the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was passed, handing over America's gold and silver reserves and ultimately the total control of America's economy to the Federal Reserve Bank. Think about it. A private corporation established their private bank, acting as the central bank of The United States, But it isn't even a government institution, but a privately owned banking system. Is it a coincidence that social security numbers started being assigned in 1935, social security numbers being the nine digit numbers given to every U. S. Citizen, and used for income tracking and taxation purposes. Ultimately, individual income taxes have been the primary source of revenue for the U. S. Federal government since the 1950s. These moves make a lot of sense when examined through the lens of The United States as a corporation and its citizens as employees, a corporate government asset before they even go through puberty. But still, throughout all this time, there was a promise that the American dollar was actually worth something. Something tangible, not just the confidence to exchange it for goods and services. A dollar was worth one thirty fifth an ounce of gold. But then President Richard Nixon came along and screwed that up for us. Severing the final link between the dollar and gold in 1971. In other words, he took the dollar off the gold standard once and for all. Steadily, the purchasing power of the dollar has declined while federal and consumer debt has increased. Currently, we're witnessing the culmination of all of these decisions, and it ain't pretty. We're one bad flu season removed from Weimar Republic wheelbarrow money. So who would you say benefited from the Act of 1871? The average US citizen, or the bankers who incorporated The United States, who have been buying politicians ever since? The same Federal Reserve who serves absolutely no real function except stealing the purchasing power of your sixty plus hour work week and then redistributing those funds to destroy your rights and enslave you on your own soil. Hey, just like they did back in Babylon. It's the same folks using the same debt slavery system, time after time. When will we learn that debt with interest is a system of perpetual debt, and is continually passed on to the people beneath, until until the debt gap consumes all but those who own the debt? Well, like I said in the beginning of this video, the most pivotal year in United States history was never taught to me in schoolpublic or privateand never taught to me at a college level. But as Americans, it's so important that we not let this information die with our generation. One of the most important lessons you can teach your children is how to obtain their own freedomhow to identify when their freedoms are being taken from them, and how to demand those personal freedoms and liberties back, instead of waiting around for a hero in the form of a politician to represent them, to offer solutions. During this time, we've seen people of all ages crying out for change. And instead of focusing on the changes we could make that could fundamentally change The United States for the better, especially on an individual level, politicians are selling socialism and communism, aka more government control, to young people looking for an answer. And they beg for it because the future seems so bleak. Whether you play with paper or with digital money, the future will always be bleak if you're a debt slave. If before your foot even touches this earth, you're scanned into the system as an employee of this corporation who does not care about you one bit. The United States is still a great country, but it has its problems, and you know you can riot and loot and protest protest all all you you want. Want, But until the Federal Reserve is ended, until the Act of 1871 is torn into a thousand pieces and thrown into the wind, until the IRS is abolished, and until we move back to the gold standard, we have no chance at experiencing any iota of freedom.

A thousand years after the death of Christ, money changers, those who loan out and manipulate the quantity of money, were active in medieval England. They were not bankers per se; the money changers generally were the goldsmiths. They were the first bankers because they started keeping other people's gold for safekeeping in their vaults. The first paper money was merely a receipt for gold left at the goldsmith. Paper money caught on because it was more convenient than carrying around a lot of heavy gold and silver coins. Eventually, goldsmiths noticed that only a small fraction of the depositors ever came in and demanded their gold at any one time. Goldsmiths started cheating on the system. They discovered that they could print more money than they had gold, and usually, no one would be the wiser. Then they could loan out this extra money and collect interest on it. This was the birth of fractional reserve banking, that is, loaning out many times more money than you have assets on deposit. So, if a thousand dollars in gold were deposited with them, they could loan out about $10,000 in paper money and draw interest payments on it, and no one would ever discover the deception. By this means, goldsmiths gradually accumulated more and more wealth and used this wealth to accumulate more and more gold. Today, this practice of loaning out more money than there are reserves is known as fractional reserve banking. Every bank in The United States is allowed to loan out at least 10 times more money than they actually have. That's why they get rich on charging, let's say, 8% interest. It's not really 8% per year, which is their income. It's 80%. That's why bank buildings are always the largest in town. But does that mean that all interest or all banking should be illegal? Hardly. In the Middle Ages, canon law, the law of the Catholic Church, forbade charging interest on loans. This concept followed the teachings of Aristotle and St. Thomas Aquinas. They taught that the purpose of money was to serve the members of society to facilitate the exchange of goods needed to lead a virtuous life. Interest, in their belief, hindered this purpose by putting an unnecessary burden on the use of money. In other words, interest was contrary to reason and justice. Reflecting Church law in the Middle Ages, Europe forbade charging interest on loans and made it a crime called usury. As commerce grew, and therefore opportunities for investment arose in the late Middle Ages, it came to be recognized that to loan money had a cost for the lender, both in risk and in lost opportunity. So some charges were allowed, but not interest per se. But all moralists, no matter what religion, condemn fraud, oppression of the poor, and injustice is clearly immoral. As we will see, fractional reserve lending is rooted in a fraud, results in widespread poverty, and reduces the value of everyone else's money. The ancient goldsmiths discovered that extra profits could be made by rowing the economy between easy money and tight money. When they made money easier to borrow, then the amount of money in circulation expanded. Money was plentiful. People took out more loans to expand their businesses. But then, the money changers would tighten the money supply. They would make loans more difficult to get. What would happen? Just what happens today. A certain percentage of people could not repay their previous loans and could not take out new loans to repay the old ones. Therefore, they went bankrupt and had to sell their assets to the goldsmiths for pennies on the dollar. The same thing is still going on today. Only today, we call this rowing of the economy up and down the business cycle. Like Julius Caesar, King Henry the first

Usury is illegal. In Christian nations, lending money for an interest rate was illegal. Because it was illegal, who did the lending? The Jews. So there was Christians who could lend for 0% or didn't lend at all. And then these people called the Jews would come over and start lending money. They would start charging money. And in a couple generations, guess what would happen to the economy? The Jews owned everything, and then guess what the king did? Rounded them up and threw them out of the country. This went on for thousands of years. This is why the Jews in history have had no country, because the king would have it, it would say no usury, no money lending, and they would start the money lending, they would start the central bank, compete with the king. There is a reason why it was illegal.

Borrowing from banks leads to nations becoming dependent on loans, resulting in banks having power over them. This creates a system where banks rule instead of a sovereign democracy. This is known as plutocracy, which is a major issue in today's economies. For instance, Obama borrowed $2 trillion from big banks and gave it back to them, supposedly for lending to the public. However, this system allows banks to lend out much more money than they actually have through fractional reserve lending. The 2008 financial crisis showed that big banks were highly leveraged, and Obama even suggested eliminating reserve requirements altogether. This system allows banks to consolidate wealth and control the politics of the nation, undermining government sovereignty and public interest.

The financial system is the main source of control in the world. It doesn't matter who we think runs the world, what matters is the mechanism used to exert control, which is finance. Finance is designed to put people in debt and enslave them. For example, a mortgage is a death grip because it means you don't really own your house, the bank does. Even if you own your house outright, the government can still tax you and take it away if you can't pay. This system gives a small group of individuals infinite power and they have used their money to buy everything and everyone they can.

For centuries, Christians were not allowed to lend money with interest, so Jews took on this role. Over time, the Jews ended up owning everything, leading kings to expel them from their countries. This pattern repeated for thousands of years, as the Jews would move to a new country and face the same fate. Compound interest was seen as a powerful force that could consume all property, which is why it was illegal in Christian nations. Nowadays, we have debt slavery, where people are burdened with repaying borrowed money plus interest. In Italy, economist Pareto observed that 80% of the land was owned by 20% of the families, and this coincided with the rise of modern banking and the exchange of gold for notes by the Jewish population.

All three Abrahamic religions initially considered charging interest as immoral, but over time, usury became more accepted in Western society. Fractional reserve banking allows banks to create money out of thin air and charge interest on loans. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and subsequent events led to the US printing money beyond its gold reserves. To maintain world reserve currency status, the US relied on its military and engaged in wars to protect the petrodollar. The current financial system is likened to a Ponzi scheme, with markets crashing and the derivatives market being worth more than the world's financial assets. The collapse of this system is imminent, and the future banking system should prioritize serving the people.

Banks, including the ones we use today, were built on the back of slavery. The forced labor of 11 million enslaved people helped Britain become a global superpower. Even after slavery was abolished, the British government compensated slave owners with £20 million, which was not given to the slaves themselves. The debt was only paid off in 2015, meaning taxpayers' money went towards compensating slave owners. The UK's largest banks, including Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds, and the Bank of England, have all been linked to the slave trade through these compensation payments. British banks also profited indirectly from slavery by providing finance to slave traders and offering plantation mortgages secured against the value of slaves. The city of London, a global financial hub, was built with the labor of enslaved people.

All three Abrahamic religions initially considered charging interest as immoral, but over time, usury became more accepted in Western society. Fractional reserve banking allows banks to create money out of thin air and charge interest on loans. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and the Emergency Banking Act of 1933 further increased debt, while the banking cartel funded both World Wars. The US turned to its military and the petrodollar to maintain world reserve currency status. However, this Ponzi scheme is collapsing, with crashing markets and a quadrillion-dollar derivatives market. The banking cartel aims to convert everyone to an authoritarian CBDC, but without trust, they will face challenges. Hard times are approaching, and it is suggested to prepare and create a banking system that serves the people.

Usury, or charging interest, was historically illegal in Christian nations, leading to Jewish money lending. As they provided loans, they accumulated wealth, prompting kings to expel them repeatedly. This cycle of expulsion occurred over centuries, contributing to the Jewish diaspora. Napoleon noted that compound interest could eventually consume all property, highlighting its potential for economic domination. Today, debt slavery exists, where individuals are burdened by loans and interest, akin to historical forced slavery. Pareto's principle illustrates that a small percentage of people often own most resources, a phenomenon observed in early banking in Italy. Understanding the formula of time multiplied by compound interest reveals its power, especially in long-term investments.

The financial system is seen as the main problem, with finance meant to enslave through debt like mortgages. Even if you buy a house, the bank technically owns it. This system benefits a small group controlling everything with money.

A small group of wealthy individuals, particularly the Rothschilds, gained control of central banks in Europe and created the Central Bank in the USA. They discovered that lending money to desperate countries during war times allowed them to manipulate governments and accumulate wealth. They even started wars themselves, funding both sides to control the outcome and exploit the resources of the countries involved. By printing unlimited amounts of money and lending it out, they enslaved individuals and governments through debt and excessive taxation. Throughout history, they have funded and profited from wars, set up monopolies, and reduced the population through unnecessary bloodshed. The CIA assassinated JFK because he opposed the Central Bank Mafia and their war machine. Events like 9/11 were used to further their agenda of population reduction.

All three Abrahamic religions initially considered charging interest as immoral, but over time, usury became more accepted in Western society. Fractional reserve banking allows banks to create money out of thin air and charge interest on loans. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and the Emergency Banking Act of 1933 further increased debt, while the banking cartel funded both World Wars. The US turned to its military and the petrodollar to maintain world reserve currency status. However, this Ponzi scheme is collapsing, with crashing markets and a quadrillion-dollar derivatives market. The banking cartel aims to convert everyone to an authoritarian CBDC, but without trust, they will face challenges. Hard times are approaching, and it is suggested to prepare and create a banking system that serves the people.