reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I first stumbled across agenda 21 in about 2008, and my first reaction was to dismiss what I was reading because I didn't believe that any government in Australia would take us down this road. Then I began to see a legislative pattern emerging in parliament which concerned me greatly, and I also started to see the tenor of legislation that we were passing. I did air those concerns in parliament, and it was dismissed and ignored. The words agenda 21, ladies and gentlemen, were never meant to be spoken. And if they were, then, of course, it would be dismissed as a conspiracy theory. Because if people knew agenda 21 and what it stood for, there's plenty of information out there where they could actually learn what the end game was, and governments didn't want that to be known. My dad always said to me that people only lie for two reasons. One reason is because you're ashamed of what you're doing, and the second reason is that you don't want people to be warned just before you screw them. And I honestly believe that these secrets have been kept for both of those reasons. Ladies and gentlemen, the origins of the environmental movement as we see it began back in 1968 when the Club of Rome was formed. The Club of Rome has been described as a crisis think tank which specializes in crisis creation. The main purpose of this think tank was to formulate a crisis that would unite the world and condition us to the idea of global solutions to local problems. In a document called the first global revolution authored by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider on pages 104 and 105, it stated, in searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine, and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers, of course, will be caused by human intervention that will require a global response. That's the origin of global warming, ladies and gentlemen. In 1975, Australia agreed to bring in a new economic order via the Lima Declaration on the second conference of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization. The outcome of this was, as I said, the Lima declaration which was a blueprint for the redeployment of tools, jobs, and manufacturing to the developing nations, leaving countries like Australia short of technology, a manufacturing base, and jobs. Blind Freddy can now see what the outcome of that has been for our country with their unworkable trade and tariffs agreements hand in hand with this that have followed as a matter of course. This has now become a reality with around 90% of our agriculture and manufacturing just gone. Australia signed the Lima declaration in 1975 and hundreds of others with the support of all major political players, Whitlam, Fraser, Hawke, Keating, Houston, Howard, Rudd, the democrats, the greens, and even the Nationals. It has been put to me that all of these treaties were the foundation for the rollout of agenda 21. And it seems that Australia has been moved around the global chessboard, and our so called leaders were either complicit or naive to the long term consequences. And now we're almost at checkmate. Sorry. In 1992, former president of The United States George Bush senior said, effective execution of agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of human society unlike anything the world has ever experienced. A major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action will be integrated into individual and collective decision making at every level. Cutting through the code, I want everyone here tonight not familiar with agenda 21 to consider what the words profound reorientation of all human society and unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources actually means. For everyone here tonight not familiar with agenda 21, I would suggest that this is the beginning of your learning curve, not the end. In 1992, Morris Strong, secretary general of the UN Earth Summit and member of the Club of Rome said, it is clear the current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, ownership of motor vehicles, small electrical appliances, home and workplace air conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable. Put those statements together with the previous one, and it must become clear that agenda 21 is about controlling every aspect of our lives, how we eat, what we eat, how much we eat, how we move around, food production, the amount of food, and where we even live. Dixie Ray, former Washington state governor and assistant secretary for oceans and international environmental and scientific affairs stated, agenda 21 seeks to establish a mechanism for transferring the wealth from citizens to the third world. Fear of environmental crisis would be used to create a world government and UN central direction. From a report in the September Habitat One Conference, land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument

During the COVID crisis, there has been a conspiracy theory suggesting that population control is an underlying agenda. Official US government documents dating back to 1973 reveal that population control to limit global growth at 8 billion is US policy. The documents propose various methods such as birth control, abortion, and technological advancements to reduce population. The logic behind this policy is to suppress population growth in least developed countries, which could compete with US interests in extracting resources. This theory is influenced by the idea that the Earth has limited resources and can only sustain a certain number of human beings. The fact that the global population was approaching 8 billion in 2020 adds to the conspiracy theory.

In 1972, the Club of Rome released the "Limits to Growth" report, predicting societal collapse by 2030 due to resource scarcity and population growth. The World Economic Forum (WEF) and the Club of Rome share the same views on humanity and have been working towards their 2030 plan since the 1970s. The WEF originated from the Council on Foreign Relations and Henry Kissinger, with the 3rd meeting in 1973 setting everything in motion. The WEF's sustainable development goals, along with the UN's Agenda 2030, have led to global chaos, economic destabilization, and the rise of authoritarian governments. The WEF and the Club of Rome manipulate public sentiment through environmental issues, using it to control people. They believe in a centralized global authority and view human sacrifice as necessary for their utopian vision. Elon Musk spoke against world government at the World Government Summit, emphasizing the importance of civilizational diversity to prevent collapse.

The negative impact of population growth on planetary ecosystems is becoming evident, with concerns about energy and water exploitation and dangerous levels of atmospheric pollution. Unless nations collaborate to address population growth, overconsumption, and environmental degradation, the prospects for a decent life will be threatened. The UN should help stabilize population and stimulate economic development in a manner that is sensitive to religious and moral considerations. Economic growth is essential to improve living standards, but unrestrained growth threatens the environment. The Rio de Janeiro conference focused on sustainable growth and global development, noting that growth is efficiently managed by the private sector, but regulation by national governments and international bodies is needed. The UN should be among the catalysts and coordinators of this process.

In January 2019, my leadership team and I met in California to set goals for the next five years. One of our dreams was to reduce the global population by 50% by 2023.

At the Economic Forum, I spoke about the need to address overpopulation and its impact on the environment. Agriculture and textiles are major contributors to ecological issues. With the global population projected to reach 9.7 billion by 2050, reducing human impact is crucial. We must consider limiting the number of children we have to preserve the planet's delicate balance, as the decline of insect populations poses a serious threat. Our existence is intertwined with the health of the Earth.

The environmental movement originated in 1968 with the formation of the Club of Rome, a crisis think tank. Their goal was to create a crisis that would unite the world and promote global solutions. They identified pollution, global warming, water shortages, and famine as threats caused by human intervention. In 1975, Australia agreed to the Lima Declaration, which led to the redeployment of jobs and manufacturing to developing nations, resulting in the loss of agriculture and manufacturing in Australia. Agenda 21, a plan for global control, was introduced in 1992 by George Bush Senior and Maurice Strong. It aims to reorient society and redistribute wealth. The government's actions, such as increasing taxes and reducing services, contribute to wealth redistribution and control over citizens' lives. The legislative council is crucial for checks and balances. The Club of Rome and its members, including Ted Turner and Mikhail Gorbachev, advocate for depopulation and view environmentalism as a new world religion.

Human population growth is a major issue that impacts many other problems. If the population was the same as it was 500 years ago, many of these issues wouldn't exist.

Climate change is a symptom of promoting growth on a finite planet. If we solve it, other pressures like water scarcity will emerge. The book "Limits to Growth" predicted this in 1972, showing that global growth is unsustainable. Despite focusing on energy and fossil fuels, population and consumption are ignored. Politically, addressing these issues is challenging. Lowering living standards and discussing birth rates are taboo. However, creating circumstances where women can choose the number of children they want can help address population growth.

Speaker 0 outlines a narrative linking the origins of the environmental movement to the Club of Rome, described as a crisis think tank that purportedly specializes in crisis creation. The speaker cites a document, The First Global Revolution by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider, claiming it states that pollution, global warming, water shortages, famine and similar dangers would fit the bill as a new enemy to unite the world and justify a global response to local problems, thereby claiming “the origin of global warming.” The speaker then connects this to Australia, asserting that in 1975 Australia accepted a new economic order via the Lima Declaration at the UNIDO conference. The Lima Declaration, they say, was a blueprint for redeploying tools, jobs and manufacturing to developing nations, leaving Australia short of technology, a manufacturing base and jobs, and that unworkable trade and tariffs agreements followed. They claim these treaties were the foundation for the rollout of Agenda 21 and contend Australia has been moved on a global chessboard with leaders either complicit or naive to long-term consequences. The segment cites 1992 remarks by former U.S. president George Bush Sr. about Agenda 21, describing it as requiring a profound reorientation of human society and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources, integrating concern for environmental consequences into decision making at every level. The speaker urges the audience to consider the implications of “profound reorientation of all human society” and “unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources.” The speaker references Morris Strong, then secretary-general of the UN Earth Summit, stating that affluent middle-class lifestyles are not sustainable, including high meat intake, frozen foods, fossil fuels, vehicle ownership, and other consumption patterns. The implication drawn is that Agenda 21 is about controlling every aspect of life—what and how we eat, how we move, food production, quantity of food, and where we live. Dixie Ray, former Washington state governor and assistant secretary for oceans and international environmental and scientific affairs, is quoted as saying Agenda 21 seeks to transfer wealth from citizens to the third world. A fear-based trajectory is described where fear of environmental crisis would be used to create a world government with UN central direction. The speaker quotes a Habitat One report suggesting land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset and that private land ownership contributes to social injustice, implying a redistribution of wealth through land and resource control. A report from the president’s council on sustainable development is cited as advocating a new collaborative decision process for better decisions and more rapid change in resource use. Harvey Ruben of the Wildlands Project and Jay Gary Lawrence are invoked to suggest that individual rights would be subordinated to the collective, and that participating in UN-planned processes would provoke conspiracy-minded groups to resist, leading to alternative labels like comprehensive planning or sustainable development. The narrative claims that costs are rising for citizens while services are cut, portraying this as wealth redistribution and redeployment of resources that harms the working poor. It references debates over land rights and water allocation, the native vegetation act, and development and planning acts as threats to food producers and long-term security, with alluding to heritage status used to justify control over land titles. The speaker argues for legislative Council checks and balances as a safeguard against parties colluding to pass restrictive policies, urging public participation to restrain erosion of common law, and portraying agenda 21 as an ongoing threat since 2008. The account then traces the Club of Rome’s 1972 Limits to Growth and its environmental alarmism, linking Ted Turner and Mao to early endorsements of the movement, and cites 1987 and 1996 statements about a new world order and an environmental crisis unlocking a one-world government. It asserts the Earth Summit produced the Earth Charter, co-written by Morris Strong and Mikhail Gorbachev, as a new set of commandments with environmentalism as a new world religion, and connects this to Agenda 21. Ted Turner’s 1996 reductionist population statements are included, along with a 1998 Baltimore Sun report on Turner’s donations to the UN aimed at stalling population growth and supporting sterilization to “save mother earth.”

Human population growth is a significant issue that cannot be ignored. It is the root cause of many other problems we face today. If the population size was the same as it was 500 years ago, the problems we discuss would not exist.

The project explores the origins of population control, its founders, and the intersection of the military-industrial complex, philanthropy, and academia. Research is based on Phyllis Pietro's book, "World Population Crisis, The United States Response," with a foreword by George H.W. Bush, noting his father's involvement with Planned Parenthood. The research uses visual representation to map connections between organizations and individuals involved in population control. Milestones are tracked from the 1920s to the 1970s, highlighting influential figures and organizations. International Planned Parenthood's development is traced from the American Birth Control League, noting the involvement of figures like Corolla Warburg Rothschild and Margaret Sanger. In the 1950s, the UN became involved, and the Draper Committee was formed post-World War II to address global issues, including population. The committee included industrialists, high-ranking military officials, and members of Skull and Bones, the Council on Foreign Relations, and people connected to the military industrial complex. These individuals were also linked to International Planned Parenthood and the Population Crisis Committee. The speaker claims Planned Parenthood served US hegemony and instituted control over the planet.

In 1969, I released a report on the Club of Rome, an organization that was relatively unknown at the time. Many people dismissed it as a paranoid conspiracy, even suggesting it had ties to the Catholic church. However, last year, the Club of Rome celebrated its anniversary, proving its existence. Alexander King, the chairman, made a shocking statement that the American people should accept the fact that they will never experience full employment again in their lifetime. It is scandalous that our government is collaborating with this organization, which was established by the Royal Institute for International Affairs. Their goal seems to be the destruction of the middle class in the United States and the implementation of policies that could lead to global genocide.

The world population has grown significantly over the past few centuries, reaching 7.4 billion today. Efforts are being made to invent and distribute vaccines to reduce sickness and population growth. A secretive meeting in 2009, attended by billionaires like Bill Gates and Warren Buffett, discussed using their wealth to address overpopulation. The negative impact of population growth on ecosystems is evident, and the United Nations should play a role in stabilizing world population. Stabilizing the population is crucial to combat global warming caused by excessive resource consumption. Suggestions were made to reduce the population by 85% or around 2 billion people. By improving healthcare and reproductive services, the population could potentially be lowered by 10-15%. The ultimate solution, a vaccine, is expected within the next two years.

The negative impact of population growth on planetary ecosystems is becoming evident, with concerns over energy and water exploitation and dangerous levels of atmospheric pollution. Unless nations collaborate to address population growth, overconsumption, and environmental degradation, the prospects for a decent life will be threatened. The UN meeting in Cairo focused on population growth, highlighting the difficulty of addressing divisive issues with moral dimensions. The United Nations should help stabilize population and stimulate economic development sensitive to religious and moral considerations. Economic growth, essential for improving living standards, poses environmental threats without careful coordination. The Rio de Janeiro conference addressed sustainable growth and global development, noting that growth is efficiently managed by the private sector, but requires regulation by governments and international bodies. The United Nations should be among the catalysts and coordinators of this process.

During the COVID crisis, there has been a theory that population control is an underlying agenda. Official US government documents dating back to 1973 reveal that population control to cap global growth at 8 billion is US policy. The logic behind this is to suppress population growth in least developed countries that the US wishes to exploit for resources. This theory is based on the idea that the Earth has limited resources and can only sustain a certain number of human beings. The goal is to use various means, including birth control and abortion, to limit population growth. These documents support the theory and raise questions about the intentions behind it.

At the Economic Forum, a speaker addressed population concerns, acknowledging the reluctance of others to discuss the issue. They emphasized the need for fewer people on the planet, as the current population of 7.3 billion is projected to reach 9.7 billion by 2050. The speaker suggested reducing the human footprint by limiting the number of children. They highlighted the importance of insects and worms for the planet's survival, stating that if they disappear, the planet will be destroyed. Ultimately, the speaker concluded that the planet would flourish if humans were to disappear.

The difference between the economic and engineering ways of thinking is highlighted by the Club of Rome report, Limits of Growth. The report argued that finite resources and exponential growth would lead to a future where we run out of essential resources like steel and coal. However, history has shown that innovation and discovery have allowed us to find substitutes for natural resources. The total volume of known reserves, including oil, is higher than ever before. This demonstrates that specific predictions about resource depletion should be met with skepticism, as the world is unpredictable and the future is uncertain.

The video discusses the concept of growth and its impact on the world. It highlights the finite nature of resources and the need for balance between human activities and nature. The study conducted by the Club of Rome concludes that continued growth will lead to crises such as pollution, resource depletion, and food shortages. The video explores different scenarios and the potential consequences of growth, including collapse and instability. It suggests that a shift away from the emphasis on material goods and economic growth is necessary to create a more sustainable and equitable world. The video emphasizes the importance of informed decision-making, political action, and individual responsibility in shaping a better future.

We cannot hide away from human population growth because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there were if there was the size of population that there was five hundred years ago. We cannot hide away from human population growth because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there were if there was the size of population that there was five hundred years ago. We cannot hide away from human population growth because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there were if there was the size of population that there was five hundred years ago.

Speaker 0: We tend to think about capital as only financial capital—cash and financial assets—but that is not the only value our economies depend on. Every aspect of the economy is fundamentally dependent on nature: the air we breathe, the water we drink, the soil, the oceans for the food we consume, and the minerals needed for technology and infrastructure. Without these forms of natural capital, economies wouldn’t exist; they are the fundamental building blocks. Yet the ways we have grown our economies and our models of economic development have been incredibly successful for global prosperity. But the unintended consequences of current growth models are not sustainable on a finite planet. The resources we draw from Earth and the pollution and waste we emit—greenhouse gas emissions, sewage, plastics into the ocean—are beyond the Earth’s carrying capacity. This is leading to significant direct impacts on society and substantial financial costs for the economy. Macro-level calculations show these costs, and they’re also showing up in practical ways as we breach environmental boundaries and undermine nature. These breaches translate into financial risks for institutions: lack of water disrupts operations and supply chains where water is an essential input for manufacturing or power production; soil degradation reduces agricultural yields; the decline of pollinator species affects agriculture. All of this leads to direct financial risks for organizations, for businesses, and ultimately for investors. The root cause is that decision-making within businesses and financial institutions currently relies on financial data and metrics that do not factor in nature. Nature is treated within the economy as though it is unlimited and predominantly free, and the risks and harms are not costed in financial terms. While macro-level costs can be calculated, they are not integrated into day-to-day decision making. The consequence is that our economies are placed at fundamental risk. We cannot do business on a dead planet. To protect natural systems, one solution is to bring nature onto the balance sheet—bring nature into the ways decisions are made within business, allocate a value to it, and integrate it into accounting and financial mechanisms.

Speaker 0: We cannot hide away from human population growth because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there were if there was the size of population that there was five hundred years ago.

In January 2019, my leadership team and I gathered in California to set goals for the next five years. One of our dreams was to reduce the global population by 50% by 2023. Today, it seems like this dream is starting to come true.

At the Economic Forum, a speaker addressed population concerns, acknowledging the reluctance of others to discuss the issue. They highlighted the ecological impact of agriculture and textiles, emphasizing the violence inherent in our way of life. The speaker pointed out the exponential growth of the human population, predicting a disastrous outcome with nearly 10 billion people by 2050. They suggested reducing the human footprint by limiting the number of children. The speaker also warned about the threat of declining insect and worm populations, stating that the planet would flourish without humans.