reSee.it - Related Video Feed

There are thousands of pets out there dining out every day. While we sat at this table, five, six pets died in The United States from a rabies vaccine they didn't need. Anybody can walk in here, sit down and say whatever they want, but I gave you silence. I said to the state board, if I had to kill an animal to obey that law, would I have to do They said yes. One rabies vaccine is good for life. All this is unnecessary if that dog had a titer check, it would not need a vaccination. So this is the real problem here. I had put upstairs in the public health department 45 articles that show vaccines are dose dependent. Titers indicate immunity. It's been proven. Okay. But who's the we? Who's the we? The researchers. The researchers. These are the researchers. They're the ones who do the research. Okay. I spent a career the pharmaceutical. And I spent a career being a veterinarian watching the animals die. See. Think that happened before. But I completely don't agree with what you're saying. Do you know of any studies that the vaccine can sometimes create other health concerns for animals? Can you talk a little bit about that? Absolutely. You get tumors at the injection sites. You get autoimmune diseases that start later in life, but you get the immediate reactions. Some dogs die immediately of anaphylaxis. Others get just serum sickness and they vomit. Maybe you hide under the bed for a day or two. But if I lower my dose to protect the animal, then I'm in trouble. So I have to do what the manufacturer says. And like the State Board of Connecticut said, if I have to kill my pet, I have to kill my pet. It's the law. Well, guess what? I have a Hippocratic oath that is greater than any law that's passed in the state of Connecticut that would make me kill my patient. I won't do it.

Healthy beagles were subjected to an experimental drug and intentionally infested with disease-carrying flies, known as maximum pain experimentation. FOIA documents reveal the animals suffered greatly, being eaten and gnawed raw until infected. Dr. Fauci's budget has reached over $6 billion in annual tax-funded funding, with at least half being wasted on questionable animal experiments like these beagle tests and other maximum pain experiments. It is important to hold Fauci accountable for the significant waste and abuse, both domestically and internationally.

According to the speaker, most vaccines have never been tested in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate their safety. The speaker claims that vaccines contain aluminum compounds because many dead vaccines don't mount an immune response without them. The speaker alleges that in a Gardasil vaccine study, the placebo group received an aluminum adjuvant instead of a true placebo, resulting in similar side effect profiles between the active vaccine and placebo groups. The speaker asserts that Merck used a novel aluminum compound and that data suggests aluminum in vaccines is profoundly toxic. The speaker states that the only true randomized controlled trial involving a vaccine was conducted on sheep with blue tongue disease. The results allegedly showed that the aluminum in the vaccine was toxic, causing the sheep to become sick, unsociable, and, in some cases, die. The speaker concludes that the assumption that aluminum adjuvants in vaccines are safe is unfounded and has never been tested.

The speaker discusses rabies and vaccines in a conspiratorial frame, arguing that rabies is fake and that the treatment and vaccine are worse than the disease. They state that the vaccine is claimed to be mandatory, but argue that mandating is “voluntary to a service” and that the true situation is a game where “mandatory” only applies once you agree to it. They claim the test for rabies is the same as used during the pandemic, asserting that “the fruit came up positive for an illness,” and suggest that this demonstrates that “we’ve been lied to,” with implications that vets benefit from the situation. The speaker recounts an historical diagnostic method: in the early nineteen hundreds, rabbits were the primary diagnostic tool to determine if an animal had rabies. They describe a procedure where, if a person was bitten by a suspected dog, “the brain tissue of the dog was injected into the two rabbits,” and “If the two rabbits died, rabies was proven.” They present this as the science behind rabies diagnosis. They then criticize the vaccine’s safety, claiming “that vaccine comes with a lot of side effects.” They cite an example case: “38 dogs and cats took the new vaccine that was made out by Merck,” and claim that these subjects “started having seizures, aggression, and death,” concluding with the statement that the vaccine is portrayed as “Safe and effective” by others. On a path to alternatives, the speaker says you could find a holistic vet who will give a medical exemption so you don’t have to receive the vaccine, or you could simply say no. They claim that if a vet “doesn’t wanna play ball,” you can make them sign a vaccination guarantee that nothing will happen to your animal after taking the injection, and predict that the vet “won’t sign it.” The segment ends with a provocative note encouraging skepticism about viruses, followed by the assertion that if you are unvaccinated and the virus enters your community, the virus will … (the clip ends here with an incomplete thought, implying a cautionary consequence).

Drug companies are not interested in natural substances that cannot be patented. The FDA requires substances to be tested for safety and effectiveness before they can be used legally. However, since natural substances cannot be patented, drug companies are unlikely to spend the money to test them. As a result, the FDA will always consider natural substances unproven and condemn them.

Speaker 0 says people must “take a stand,” comparing vaccine skepticism to rabies prevention. They describe a scenario in which people vaccinate animals for rabies, instructing them to “say no” and “fire the vet,” claiming rabies “doesn’t even exist.” They also state that vets recommend many vaccines—citing examples like “14 different vaccines”—and ask “For what?” by arguing that wild animals do not need vaccines and live “perfectly fine” without them. Speaker 0 claims vets insist animals need vaccinations because “they need to keep the vets in business” and “keep their job,” telling pet owners they need to vaccinate animals. They add that some people get rabies vaccine for their dog, the dog later dies, and the vet responds “Oh, it must’ve been rabies,” while claiming the outcome is treated as if it was definitely rabies rather than potentially the vaccines. They refer to these people and vets as “Muppets,” describing this pattern as something they deal with regularly. Speaker 0 further asserts that vaccines have been “poisoning people and animals since 1626,” and claims anyone who says otherwise “work[s] for the system.” They say the system wants animals “poisoned and sick,” and argue that animals are meant to eat raw meat and “are healed” by doing so. They argue that animals in the wild eat raw meat, describing wild animals as consuming raw prey rather than cooked kibble or processed food. They extend this idea to common household species, saying cats, dogs, and chickens eat what is natural for them. Speaker 0 claims chickens are fed soy and corn and canola, while stating that chickens in the wild “eat bugs,” “eat worms,” “eat ticks,” and “eat everything that’s around.” Speaker 0 links this to human reactions to eggs and chicken, saying that when people eat eggs and “every time… feel sick,” it is because the chicken ate soy, corn, and canola, and people then consume the eggs or chicken. They state that this causes an allergic reaction because the body is “trying to tell you, stop poisoning me,” and reiterate: “straight up, stop poisoning me.” They conclude by describing the overall situation as “absolutely crazy.”

The speaker points out that the COVID-19 vaccine was released to the public without undergoing animal testing, which is unusual, especially for children. The animal testing was initially started but stopped due to the animals dying. This means that the American people are essentially being used as test subjects. Despite the rising death count, businesses are considering making the experimental vaccine mandatory for employees, and this issue is being ignored.

Anything from nature cannot be patented, so drug companies won't spend millions testing natural substances for FDA approval. The FDA requires efficacy and safety testing, but since natural substances can't be patented, no company will invest in the testing. Therefore, according to the speaker, the FDA will always condemn anything from nature as unproven, regardless of its potential effectiveness.

- The speaker asserts that there has never been a single animal with rabies and claims animals are injected to keep veterinarians in business. - If a vet recommends rabies shots, the speaker says you should fire them, alleging the shots promote poison to immunize and then cause a debilitating disease, creating a lifetime patient. - The speaker claims there are no rabid dogs roaming about, and that rabies is fabricated. - They describe the origin of rabies studies as involving rabid dogs kept in cages that went nuts, with the vaccine being placed in the dogs’ heads after they died, and claim this demonstrated the vaccine’s effectiveness. - The speaker asserts that today dogs are still injected for rabies to poison the dogs and create lifelong patients. - Two books are cited as debunking this view: The Contagion Myth by Tom Cowan and The Poison Needle by Eleanor McBean. - The speaker generalizes that professionals, including vets and doctors, are there to keep you as a patient for life.

The speaker raises concerns about the COVID-19 vaccine, stating that it skipped animal testing and went straight to human testing. They claim that the animal tests were stopped because the animals were dying. The speaker suggests that the American people are now being used as guinea pigs for this experimental vaccine. They also criticize businesses that want to make the vaccine mandatory for employees, despite the rising death count associated with it.

The worst animal testing I've encountered involved breeding kittens, forcing them to eat cat meat, and then killing them—thousands of them. The Department of Justice was also conducting live animal training exercises involving stabbing, shooting, and blowing up animals. We successfully stopped and defunded that. Additionally, NIH and Fauci-funded experiments in Tunisia involved placing dogs' heads in mesh cages filled with biting flies. These are just a few examples of the horrific, taxpayer-funded animal testing that's happening. The public is unaware of the extent of this cruelty, and if they were, they would be outraged.

Taxpayer dollars fund transgender animal testing, involving surgically altering mice, rats, and monkeys with hormone therapies to mimic gender transitions. Research explores the effects of these transitions on their biology, psychology, and physiology, including vaccine responses and effects of substances like testosterone and estrogen. One grant, for example, involved giving female rats testosterone and then a party drug to study overdose likelihood. Accessing information on this funding is extremely difficult. Dr. Fauci funded approximately 95% of these experiments. The Trump administration planned to reduce EPA animal testing by 30% by 2025 and eliminate it entirely by 2035, a move that would save taxpayer money because animal testing is time-consuming, expensive, and inaccurate in predicting human health effects. The Biden administration reversed this plan.

The speaker discusses the testing of vaccines on animals and jokes about the potential advantages in the Olympics. They mention the emergence of AIDS and leukemia due to wild viruses, and how this was considered good science at the time. They also raise concerns about the potential negative outcomes of profit-driven and population control-focused science conducted by the military, medical, and petrochemical industries.

It's estimated that over $20 billion of taxpayer money is wasted annually on ineffective and inhumane animal tests. The NIH admits that animal models don't accurately predict how drugs will work in humans, leading to wasted time and money. Experiments range from injecting puppies with cocaine to putting dead turtles on treadmills. A lack of innovation, transparency, and accountability contributes to the problem. Agencies often don't report how much money is spent, how many animals are used, or what taxpayers are getting out of it. For example, cats had marbles shoved up their rectums and were electroshocked in constipation experiments. Also, over $240 million in NIH grants fund transgender animal experiments, including studies on the effects of party drugs on animals injected with testosterone and how hormones used for human gender transitions impact the size and shape of animals' genitals.

Pets have died in the US from unnecessary rabies vaccines. The speaker questions the need for these vaccines, suggesting that a tire check would indicate immunity. They mention having provided articles to the public health department that support the idea that vaccines are dose dependent. Another speaker, who has a background in the pharmaceutical industry, disagrees. The first speaker explains that vaccines can cause tumors, immune diseases, and immediate reactions in animals. They express their refusal to follow a law that would require them to harm their patients.

Animal testing is purportedly needed to see how humans interact with drugs and to find cures for diseases. However, the similarities between animal and human bodies are vastly different, so there may not be scientific justification for these experiments. It is argued that it is fear mongering to suggest that animal torture is needed for human cures. Data from the NIH, Defense Department, and FDA show that 90-99% of drugs fail in humans after being safe and effective in animal tests because animal tests don't accurately predict human reactions. Pharmaceutical companies lament being forced to experiment on animals because it doesn't provide useful data. RFK mentioned an FDA initiative to reduce animal testing, finding that AI and other modern technologies are more accurate at predicting human reactions. Mice and rats are not similar enough to humans to provide relevant data. Animal testing continues due to bureaucracy, institutional inertia, and because it's a profitable industry.

The aluminum safety study that allowed aluminum into US vaccines was based on a study of four New Zealand white rabbits, but the results from one rabbit were lost, leaving only three. The rabbits were killed after 28 days with no cognition tests. Upon sacrificing the rabbits, the aluminum adjuvants were still present in their bodies. 94% of one type of aluminum adjuvant and approximately 70% of another remained. The aluminum was found in the kidneys, liver, heart, lymph nodes, bone marrow, and brain. Despite the study's flaws and horrifying results, the FDA and CDC declared aluminum adjuvants in vaccines safe and effective. The speaker asserts that anyone who reads the study would not want to inject their children with aluminum adjuvanted vaccines.

It's estimated that over $20 billion of taxpayer money is wasted annually on ineffective and inhumane animal tests. The NIH admits that animal models fail to mimic disease or predict drug effectiveness in humans, yet billions continue to be poured into these tests. Experiments range from injecting puppies with cocaine to putting dead turtles on treadmills. A lack of innovation, transparency, and accountability exacerbates the problem. Agencies often don't report how much money is spent, how many animals are used, or what taxpayers are getting out of it. For example, taxpayer-funded cat experiments involved shoving marbles up cats' rectums and electroshocking them. We've also identified over $240 million in NIH grants for transgender animal experiments, including studies on the effects of party drugs on animals injected with testosterone and how hormones impact animal genitalia.

No vaccine has previously been released to the public without animal testing, especially for children. The animal tests were halted because the animals were dying. Now, the American public is essentially part of an experimental program, as human testing was not completed. Businesses are pushing to mandate this experimental vaccine for employment, despite a rising death count that is being overlooked.

The speaker claims that "The USDA last year approved self amplifying mRNA injections for our cats and our dogs for rabies and a few other things. And these are authorized and they're widely available for online purchase." They say "veterinarians across the country are currently injecting self amplifying mRNA into our pets." They warn that "This can probably shut on to humans and this this has to be stopped" and ask, "Has it started yet?" "Yes." They cite "Nobivac Nex NXT, it's the platform developed by Merck" and that "you will find it online, and you can even buy it." They claim it is "possible... they are either shedding the self amplifying RNA or the antigen products that the dogs or cats are now producing onto the owners through bodily fluids." They add that "none of this was tested" and "they just authorized it anyways because they don't care," and that "it's completely unknown really at this point."

The speaker points out that the COVID-19 vaccine was released to the public without completing animal testing, which is unusual, especially for children. The animal testing was stopped because the animals were dying. This means that the American people are essentially being used as guinea pigs for this experimental vaccine. Despite the rising death count, businesses are considering making the vaccine mandatory for employees, which is concerning.

According to the speaker, vaccines have never been tested in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate their safety. The speaker claims that vaccines contain aluminum compounds because many dead vaccines don't mount an immune response without them. The speaker alleges that in a Gardasil vaccine study, the placebo group received an aluminum adjuvant instead of a true placebo, so the side effect profiles of the active vaccine and placebo groups were the same. The speaker asserts that Merck used a novel aluminum compound and that data shows aluminum in vaccines is toxic. The speaker states that the only completely randomized controlled trial was on sheep using a vaccine for blue tongue disease. The speaker claims the aluminum was toxic, the sheep became sick, their behavior changed, and many died compared to the placebo group. The speaker concludes that the presumption that aluminum as an adjuvant is safe is unfounded and has never been tested.

Speaker 1 claims ivermectin is made by “big pharma,” specifically that it is made by Merck and “the vaccine companies.” They say people who promote ivermectin are “taking a vaccine product,” and then using it in a way that encourages others to take pharmaceutical pills during and after the pandemic. Speaker 1 describes that they “got a whole bunch of influencers on board to tell people to take pharmaceutical pills after the pandemic and during the pandemic,” and that this is done “without showing them that their cell phone tower is in front of their house,” after which people “have gone and take ivermectin instead.” Speaker 1 further states that ivermectin is “linked to liver toxicity,” listing “jaundice, brain damage, whole bunch of infertility, all that stuff.” They add that “that’s why they push it,” and that “anytime that they can make the population infertile, kinda goes hand in hand.” Speaker 0 responds by asserting that ivermectin has “productive toxicity” and that this is seen “in many different animal studies, rabbit studies, and other mammal studies.” Speaker 0 says the idea that ivermectin is “only toxic to arthropods, crabs, et cetera, cockroaches, is not true.” They say it is “a well-proven and well-known reproductive toxic substance” to “many different kinds of mammals.” Speaker 0 then mentions “the next one is another video on the neurotoxic effect of ivermectin,” and says they “know vets who talk about the routine use of ivermectin and the continual use of ivermectin resulting in all sorts of” effects.

Speaker 0 states that there has never been a single animal with rabies and claims animals are injected to keep vets in business. They assert that if your vet tells you your animal needs rabies shots, you should fire them. They claim all they’re doing is promoting poison so they can inject your animal, then your animal can come down with a debilitating disease, and then they have a patient for life. They define rabies as “There is no rabid dogs running around, and they're gonna get you in anything else.” They describe the first studies on rabid dogs as dogs that were locked in cages and went completely nuts, and allege the guy who created the rabies vaccine stuck it in the dog's head and said that the rabies vaccine worked after the dogs died. They assert that to this day, they are still injecting dogs for rabies, calling it a fake illness, to poison the dogs to have patients for life, calling it truly sick and twisted. They cite The Contagion Myth by Tom Cowan and The Poison Needle by Eleanor McBean as debunking this, and claim vets do the same thing as doctors—there to keep you as a patient for life. That is what they’re going to say about.

The speaker treats vaccine injuries, stating that 70% of their practice involves them. They claim rabies vaccines are among the worst. They were shocked to learn that there has been no canine strain of rabies in the US for 14 years, suggesting that dogs are being unnecessarily killed or restrained. The speaker believes that over-vaccination is occurring constantly. They assert that no vaccine is safe, and no vaccine is 100% effective.