reSee.it - Related Video Feed

An official UN report from 2000 outlines a strategy for addressing declining populations in developed nations through mass migration. It suggests that countries like Italy and Germany would require millions of migrants by 2050 to maintain their working-age populations. This isn't merely about immigration; it's about demographic transformation and control. Current migration crises in the U.S. and Europe reflect this agenda, as governments allow large influxes of migrants, straining resources and altering social dynamics. The report indicates that such demographic shifts could dilute national identities and centralize power, leading to increased surveillance and loss of sovereignty. This orchestrated migration is seen as a means to create chaos, allowing elites to expand their control under the guise of addressing population issues. The plan outlined in the report is now being executed, revealing a broader strategy for global governance.

In 2015, Josh Roche proposed a plan for the EU to accept 1 million asylum seekers yearly, issue euro bonds for financing, and establish safe channels for migrants. He accuses George Soros' NGO of influencing EU institutions to implement this plan, which he believes undermines Christian and national political forces in Europe. This migration issue is not random but part of a deliberate agenda.

In 2015, Josh Roche published a plan stating the EU must accept at least 1 million asylum seekers annually. Financing is critical, and he proposed issuing long-term Euro bonds to finance the migration crisis, including migrants' social welfare. Safe channels must be established for asylum seekers, starting by transporting them from Greece and Italy to destination countries, including Hungary and Austria. This is not accidental but a deliberate plan. The speaker claims they are fighting an organized gang called the Empire of George Soros and NGOs. They allege this group supports those transgressing the legal system, finances illegal activity, and aims to capture main positions inside EU institutions by buying out MPs and leaders. The speaker asserts this plan aims to change Europe, push aside Christian, conservative, and national-based political leaders and voters from EU decision-making bodies, and that migration is not just about migration.

In 2015, George Soros proposed a plan involving the EU accepting 1 million asylum seekers annually, issuing euro bonds for financing, and establishing safe channels for migrants. This plan is seen as an organized effort to change Europe by sidelining conservative, Christian, and national-based political leaders. Soros is accused of influencing EU institutions and supporting illegal activities against nations. The focus is not just on migration, but on reshaping the European Union's decision-making process.

In 2015, George Soros proposed a plan to the EU, calling for the acceptance of 1 million asylum seekers annually, issuing euro bonds for funding, and creating safe channels for migrants. This plan is seen as an organized effort to change Europe by influencing EU institutions and sidelining Christian conservative leaders. Critics argue that Soros and NGOs are undermining national sovereignty.

Prime Minister Orbán is seen as a controversial figure in the West due to disagreements with figures like George Soros, who believes borders are obstacles and migration is the goal. Orbán's resistance to this view has made him a target for left-wing media. Accusations of centralizing power, being undemocratic, and violating civil rights are addressed with a focus on Hungary as a "conservative island of difference." Orbán's nationalism clashes with international organizations like the EU and ICC, the latter of which Hungary exited due to disagreements over justice. Orbán is fighting postmodern secularism and radical Islamic immigration. On the Ukraine conflict, where Hungary takes a middle position, the question is raised whether it matters if Putin takes Ukraine and what the off-ramp is. Orbán defines Hungarian nationalism and the government's role in promoting Hungarian culture, including pronatalist policies. He emphasizes the importance of Christianity to Hungarian identity and fostering cooperation between government and religion. Regarding the U.S., Orbán has a warm relationship with President Trump and seeks U.S. foreign policy that strengthens allies like Hungary. He navigates a multipolar world with the U.S., China, and Russia, and considers the implications of China's rise. The U.S. president has tried to motivate Europe to move away from China.

The Obama administration, and even the early Trump administration, used taxpayer money to support the socialist government in Albania. This involved partnering with George Soros on projects aimed at weakening the independence of the Albanian judiciary. This wasn't isolated to Albania; similar activities occurred in Romania, Hungary, Guatemala, and Colombia. Soros, a billionaire, doesn't need this funding, yet the State Department and USAID enabled his influence, allowing him to shape foreign policy and even review funding applications. This taxpayer funding, the speaker argues, indirectly subsidizes Soros’s activities, both domestically and internationally, and is a way for the State Department to oppose conservative agendas. The speaker highlights this as an example of the government funding groups that oppose American interests, while right-leaning organizations are largely ignored. Legal action was necessary to obtain the documents revealing these activities.

The exchange centers on claims regarding a plan attributed to George Soros and its alleged global implementation to increase migration to the United States and Europe. Speaker 0 references a 2015 publication by George Soros, stating that the plan has now been implemented worldwide to bring millions of illegals into The United States and into Europe, and notes that Viktor Orban, Hungary’s leader, recently pointed this out. Speaker 1 recalls the details from the 2015 Project Syndicate publication, outlining two main components. First, Soros purportedly argued that the European Union must accept at least a million EU seekers annually. Second, he purportedly emphasized that Abekwa financing is critical and proposed issuing long-term euro bonds to finance the migration crisis, including funding related to migrants, social welfare, and care as they arrive in the European Union. In addition, the plan allegedly called for establishing safe channels for asylum seekers, beginning with moving them from Greece and Italy to their destination countries. The dialogue attributes these specific elements to Soros, presenting them as a policy framework or strategy. Throughout the discussion, Speaker 0 adds a brief, fragmentary remark, “that’s why they don’t like,” which appears to reference opposition or criticism without elaboration within this excerpt. Key claims highlighted in the conversation include: (1) a 2015 Soros plan published in Project Syndicate proposing that the EU accept a minimum of one million asylum seekers annually; (2) the proposal of Abekwa financing as a critical element, including the idea of issuing long-term euro bonds to fund the migration crisis, along with supporting migrants’ social welfare and care needs as they arrive; and (3) the suggestion to create safe channels for asylum seekers, starting with relocating individuals from Greece and Italy to other EU destination countries. The participants frame these points as explanations of a policy approach that they assert has been implemented globally, and they reference Viktor Orban’s commentary to support their argument. The transcript captures a concise allegation-based discussion about Soros’s 2015 proposals, their supposed financing mechanisms, and the establishment of safe relocation channels for asylum seekers, tied to ongoing political debates surrounding migration in Europe and the role of opposition figures such as Viktor Orban.

George Soros's Open Society Foundations have been revealed to be actively trying to influence political processes in Europe and Russia through funding local advocacy groups, social media projects, and journalists. For example, they provided over $130,000 to EU Observer, which used professional news reporting to promote open society values during the European elections. Additionally, leaked documents show the organization's half a million dollar effort to find evidence of Russia's alleged influence in European politics, although they acknowledge the challenges of accusing Russia. Some critics argue that Soros aims to disrupt Europe and promote open borders, referring to his version of democracy as "Sorosocracy."

The speaker outlines a project to map US State Department involvement with George Soros, The Open Society Foundations, and related entities across many countries, noting that the WikiLeaks cables (Kissinger, Carter, and Cablegate) cover 1973–2010 but omit the 1980s and 1990s. The goal is to create a comprehensive picture of how US policy has aligned with “George Soros, The Open Society Foundation, The Open Society Institute, every open society spandrel in every country.” The speaker highlights that Strobe Talbott in 1995 said US foreign policy had to be synchronized with allied governments and with Soros, describing it as “like working with a friendly, allied, independent entity, if not a government,” and stating that Soros then became “the number one political downer.” The narrative begins with precedents before the Open Society Foundation’s creation in 1979. In 1973–1975, Soros references appear in cables before the Open Society Foundation started. The speaker then focuses on a troubling example from 1976 in Gabon, via a Kissinger cable titled Visit by Brown and Root Executives to Gabon. Brown and Root, later Halliburton, is connected to George Soros through Brown and Root’s executives and projects. The CIA’s reaction to a Ramparts article about Brown and Root is discussed, showing Herman Brown (founder of Brown and Root) and his son George Rufus Brown as covert associates with the CIA under project LP coin, with Herman Brown serving as president and director of Brown and Root and trustee of the Brown Foundation. The claim is that both Herman Brown and his son had covert security clearances and were involved with CIA projects from 1965–1967, including potential service on the board of a CIA creation in Thailand/Laos. Brown and Root is described as one of Soros’s top five holdings in the mid-2000s, implying a CIA-connected origin for the company. A note is given that in Gabon, Soros Associates (founded by Paul Soros, George Soros’s older brother) is involved in port projects. Paul Soros’s shipping and engineering influence is illustrated by a Washington Post obituary, and the speaker mentions a related anecdote from Bill Burns’s autobiography The Back Channel about embassy construction projects in Russia being prebugged, and the implication that Western engineering firms with ties to intelligence could have facilitated spying. Before Open Society Foundations existed, in June 1975 Bandar Abbas Port Project in Iran involved three senior Dravo Corporation executives, plus International Systems, Van Houten Associates, and Soros Associates. The embassy was instructed to assist American bidders to ensure Soros Associates’ bid, noting Soros Associates’ engineering focus and the aim to eliminate competing bids. The government of Iran’s consideration of the American group and the influence of Soros’s bid on Iran’s judgment are documented. In Gabon, 1975–1976, financing arrangements are described: a financing package for Soros’s contract including a down payment by the Gabonese governor, an Export-Import Bank direct loan, and a First National City Bank loan, with the U.S. embassy consulting to emphasize more favorable terms and to potentially extend financing into a larger package. The accounts emphasize multiple U.S. government roles: Commerce Department, State Department, Export-Import Bank, and embassies, colluding to support Soros financing and projects, with the claim that this occurred years before the Open Society Foundations were created and began collaborating with U.S. agencies. The speaker suggests a long-standing family involvement, with older brother Paul Soros already coordinating with the State Department to secure deals for Soros Associates before 1979. The Mongolia story is promised as a later highlight. The compilation is framed as a five-decade pattern of government support for Soros-related deals, starting in 1973 and continuing through the Cablegate era.

European leaders favoring restrictive migration policies are meeting in Budapest following Hungary's vote to criminalize those aiding asylum seekers, a move defying the EU and human rights groups. Austrian Chancellor Kurz and Hungarian leader Orban, both immigration hardliners, are attending. Hungary also outlawed EU attempts to relocate asylum seekers. Orban views himself as the defender of Christian Europe against a perceived Muslim invasion, a rhetoric that led to his election victory. The "Stop Soros" campaign was popular, despite Hungary having one of the EU's lowest immigration rates. Soros is seen as the personification of a foreign invasion. Human rights groups are disappointed and hope for intervention from the EU and the Council of Europe, which is reviewing the bill. The European Commission is expected to react, but human rights organizations risk jail sentences if they help illegal immigrants apply for asylum. The EU has warned Hungary before, but Orban continues to defy them. The EU can threaten, but excluding a member state is difficult and unpopular. A mini-summit on migration is planned in Brussels this weekend. Despite low immigration numbers, the issue remains urgent, highlighting a gap between reality and perception.

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, George Soros stepped in to fill the power vacuum in Hungary, Poland, and China in the late 1980s. This marked the rise of what some call the Soros Empire, taking over where the Soviet Empire left off. How successful do you think Soros has been in his imperial ambitions?

I see NGOs as a hack, and George Soros was a master at it. He understood how to use a relatively small amount of money to establish a nonprofit, and then lobby politicians to funnel large sums of money into it. For example, a $10 million donation could be leveraged into a billion-dollar NGO. These NGOs, or nongovernmental organizations, often have appealing names, but they can essentially be graft machines. They receive grants with minimal requirements, and the government often assumes they're doing good work, even when they might not be. Many within the government are aware of this dynamic, but the funding continues.

European leaders favoring restrictive migration policies are meeting in Budapest following Hungary's vote to criminalize individuals or groups aiding asylum seekers. This move defies the EU and human rights groups. Austrian Chancellor Kurtz and Hungarian leader Orban, both immigration hardliners, are attending. Hungary also outlawed EU attempts to relocate asylum seekers. Orban views himself as the defender of Christian Europe against a perceived Muslim invasion, a rhetoric that led to his election victory. The "Stop Soros" campaign, popular in Hungary, paints George Soros as the organizer of this "invasion," despite Hungary having low immigration rates. Human rights groups are disappointed and look to the EU and the Council of Europe for recourse. The EU Commission is expected to react, but Orban has defied the EU before. While the EU can threaten sanctions, excluding a member state is difficult, especially with rising populist support. A mini-summit on migration is planned in Brussels, highlighting the issue's urgency despite low immigrant numbers.

In 2015, George Soros published a plan to bring millions of illegal immigrants to the US and Europe, as noted by Hungary's Viktor Orban. Soros proposed the EU accept at least a million asylum seekers annually and establish safe channels for their relocation from Greece and Italy to other EU countries. Orban's criticism of Soros is attributed to his opposition to these policies.

George Soros is a foreign-born, left-wing individual who aims to change the nature of our country. Leaked memos reveal three key points: a belief in their success at influencing global immigration policy, the refugee crisis as an opportunity to further this influence, and the perception of the refugee crisis as the new normal. Soros is a strong supporter of open borders, advocating for unrestricted movement for all. He views the immigration crisis as a means to advance his broader immigration agenda.

European leaders favoring restrictive migration policies are meeting in Budapest after Hungary passed laws criminalizing those who help asylum seekers, defying the EU and human rights groups. These laws include an amendment stating that alien populations cannot settle in Hungary, thus outlawing EU attempts to relocate asylum seekers. Victor Orban sees himself as the defender of Christian Europe against Muslim invasion, a rhetoric that led to his election victory. The "Stop Soros" campaign was popular, even though Hungary has one of the lowest immigration rates in the EU. Human rights groups are disappointed and hope for intervention from the European Union and the Council of Europe, which is reviewing the bill. However, these groups risk jail sentences if they help illegal immigrants apply for asylum. The EU has warned Hungary before, but Orban continues to defy the EU. While the EU can threaten sanctions, excluding a member state is difficult and unpopular. A mini-summit in Brussels will address the migrant issue, despite the fact that immigration numbers are down. There are only around 3,000 refugees in Hungary, revealing a gap between reality and perception.

In September 2015, Josh Roche outlined a comprehensive plan for addressing the migration crisis, proposing that the EU accept at least one million asylum seekers annually. He emphasized the need for additional financing, suggesting long-term euro bonds to support migrants' welfare upon arrival. A key aspect of his plan involved establishing safe channels for asylum seekers, particularly from Greece and Italy to Hungary. This situation is not merely a series of random events but part of a deliberate strategy. There are concerns about organizations, referred to as the "Empire of George Soros," that allegedly support illegal activities undermining national regulations. The broader issue encompasses the transformation of Europe, aiming to marginalize Christian and conservative political forces from decision-making within the EU.

Josh Roche published a plan in 2015 calling for the EU to accept 1 million asylum seekers annually and issue euro bonds for funding. He proposed safe channels for asylum seekers to reach their destination countries, including Hungary. This plan is seen as part of a larger effort by George Soros and NGOs to influence European Union decision-making against Christian and national-based political forces.

George Soros is the speaker's opponent, commanding an army of money, NGOs, universities, research institutions, and Brussels bureaucracy. Soros uses this army to impose his will on opponents like Hungarians, believing their values caused 20th-century horrors. The speaker claims the opposite is true: their values prevent repeating history's mistakes. Nazi and communist horrors arose because some Western European states abandoned Christian values, and today's progressives are planning to do the same.

I outline the speaker’s central claims about George Soros, the CIA, and global political influence. The speaker contends that George Soros has been one of the CIA’s most valuable private assets for over forty years, acting as the civilian, deniable funding arm of American regime-change operations worldwide. Because of this, Soros is not only allowed in the United States but protected there, enabling him to operate with impunity, which the speaker says explains his arrogance and continued influence. The speaker traces a pattern of Soros-backed “color revolutions” starting with Serbia in 2000, refined in Georgia in 2003, Ukraine in 2004, and the Arab Spring in 2011. They assert that logos for USAID, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), and the Open Society Foundations appear in all these cases, framing Soros as central to these movements. According to the speaker, the Arab Spring served as a trial run for Europe’s migrant crisis. They claim that in 2011 the CIA and Soros turned that playbook on Libya and Syria. Gaddafi allegedly warned in March 2011 that removing him would unleash millions to flood Europe from Africa; eight months later, Gaddafi was dead, Libya descended into chaos, and migrant waves began as predicted. By 2015–2016, the speaker asserts, battle-hardened jihadists and economic migrants were crossing the Mediterranean with iPhones, prepaid cards, and Twitter guides written in Arabic, described as the same social media mobilization tactics used in Kyiv and Tahrir Square. Wayne Madsen is cited as having called this pattern out in 2015, described by the speaker as a deliberate CIA social-engineering operation to fracture Europe from within, applying the same playbook to new targets. The speaker then asserts that the United States has been subject to this strategy from 2020 to the present, pointing to the summer riots of 2020 as an example. The claim continues that Soros’s Open Society Foundations donated at least $33,000,000 to groups that organized and sustained the 2020 riots, and that Soros-backed NGOs provided lawyers, maps, and logistics for the southern border caravans, as well as funding to influence police departments and district attorneys in major cities, effectively helping to elect them. The speaker argues that Soros is implementing the color-revolution playbook “on us now,” with the target being ordinary Americans rather than foreign nations. A historical reference is made to JFK, who allegedly spoke of splintering the CIA after the Bay of Pigs betrayal, a chance JFK did not realize, leaving the world the speaker claims the CIA built. The speaker notes that Hungary, a country of 9 million, has passed Stop Soros laws and expelled his operations, asking why the United States cannot do the same, and suggests finishing what JFK started.

George Soros is donating $500 million to help migrants and refugees start businesses, and he is urging others to do the same. Additionally, his foundation has committed $220 million to support leaders in black communities in the US. Soros previously pledged $1 billion to combat the spread of nationalism through a new university network. He considers this project the most important of his life and aims to build on the work of the Open Society Foundation.

George Soros is my opponent. He has a powerful army at his disposal, including money, NGOs, universities, research institutions, and Brussels' bureaucracy. He uses this army to impose his will on us Hungarians. Soros believes that the values we hold dear led to the horrors of the 20th century, but I disagree. It was the abandonment of Christian values by some Western European states that led to the atrocities of Nazism and communism. Unfortunately, today's progressives are planning to repeat those mistakes.

George Soros has been a target of misinformation and conspiracies since the 1990s, often portrayed as part of a globalist agenda. His Open Society Foundation has funded various initiatives, including support for migrant integration and democracy-building efforts. Critics argue that his influence extends to funding protests and movements in the U.S., including those opposing Israel. Allegations suggest that Soros indirectly supports groups through fiscal sponsors, complicating the tracking of donations. Discussions also touch on the ideological subversion tactics used by leftist organizations, with claims that they aim to reshape American perceptions and governance. Amidst these controversies, the narrative emphasizes a perceived threat to national security and the integrity of American values. The ongoing struggle against globalist influences is framed as a fight for sovereignty and identity.

George Soros, a Hungarian billionaire, is disliked in Hungary and many other nations for his attempts to influence governments. He was the first person to meet with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez after his election, as reported in Spain. Despite being questioned about this meeting, Sánchez has never responded in parliament. It is interesting to see the alliance between the left and extreme left with globalist billionaires. This alliance contradicts their previous anti-globalization stance and allows these billionaires to dictate how we should live while they live luxuriously.