TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

So once I knew it was safe, then I started using it, and then I found it worked. And then, yeah, all in all, I treated well over 6,000 patients, and everybody that got early treatment stayed out of the hospital. I also had patients come in that were really sick in the second week. And that was such a learning experience for me because normally if somebody walked into my office with an oxygen saturation in the low 80s, I would call an ambulance. But I had patients who were refusing to go to the hospital, and I had to give them the option to possibly die in my office, which is scary. But we saved them. I mean, we just threw the kitchen sink at him, and we didn't have monoclonal antibodies. So we brought him in every day. We did IV steroids. We did IV antibiotics. We gave him home oxygen. We gave him high dose of ivermectin.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker claims that ivermectin, not the vaccine, saved people from COVID. They criticize the use of ventilators for COVID patients, citing pulmonary edema risks. A nurse's story about a stroke post-vaccination highlights a lack of documentation and discouragement of questions by senior staff. The nurse was reassigned after questioning. Translation: The speaker believes ivermectin, not vaccines, saved people from COVID. They criticize using ventilators for COVID patients due to risks of pulmonary edema. A nurse's experience with a stroke post-vaccination reveals a lack of documentation and discouragement of questions by senior staff. The nurse was reassigned after asking questions.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

I have a chart that shows the CDC and FDA's own numbers on adverse events. Despite social media censorship, these are the true numbers. Over 28 years of reporting, Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, and Dexamethasone are shown to be safe drugs. However, since the COVID pandemic, remdesivir and the COVID vaccines have had adverse events. Our response to COVID has been a failure, with 4% of the world's population but supposedly 16% of the deaths. The VAERS system has recorded 1,600,000 adverse events from the COVID vaccines alone.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

There was a panic within the FDA to silence discussion of chlorine dioxide, similar to their stance on ivermectin. We now know ivermectin saves lives and reduces symptoms. The pandemic elements were faked, and there was an attempt to block discussion of both substances. In 2020, they tried to stop us, but we refused. After you were kicked off of YouTube, they took down 3,000,000 views of our content. I moved everything to what became Brighteon. We were broadcasting worldwide how to make it yourself. They told us to shut up, but we asserted our First Amendment rights. I even wrote a 35-page letter to the FDA, explaining our rights as a church to practice our beliefs. This wasn't a scam; we've been doing this for twenty years before COVID.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Ivermectin is a safe and effective drug for treating COVID-19, with studies showing it is safer than Tylenol and can help patients recover quickly, even those with low oxygen levels. A study in 2020 found a 50% reduction in hospitalizations when Ivermectin was used. Despite its proven benefits, hospital staff often resisted giving it to patients, leading to legal battles. However, when administered, even late in the illness, many patients improved and survived. The use of Ivermectin in hospitals is crucial for saving lives. Translation: Ivermectin es un medicamento seguro y efectivo para tratar el COVID-19, con estudios que muestran que es más seguro que el Tylenol y puede ayudar a los pacientes a recuperarse rápidamente, incluso aquellos con bajos niveles de oxígeno. Un estudio en 2020 encontró una reducción del 50% en hospitalizaciones cuando se usaba Ivermectin. A pesar de sus beneficios comprobados, el personal hospitalario a menudo se resistía a administrarlo a los pacientes, lo que llevaba a batallas legales. Sin embargo, cuando se administraba, incluso tarde en la enfermedad, muchos pacientes mejoraban y sobrevivían. El uso de Ivermectin en hospitales es crucial para salvar vidas.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Is false information telling you what happened to me? Facebook thinks it is. It took them two weeks, 25,000,000 views, $240,000 worth of monetization. I never thought I'd ever have a video that hit 25,000,000 views. This has better ratings than CNN, Fox News, everything. I told you how my wife cured her cancer of the uterus and how I cured my nose cancer. Since then, we've had armed IRS agents visit me at the ranch multiple times, and big companies have said they’re not happy about me doing the ivermectin videos. There’s only one thing to do: keep on telling the truth: what happened to me and my wife because of ivermectin. It saved my family, my life, and my wife's life. The balance Facebook owed for monetization disappeared. Zuckerberg on Joe Rogan saying they're not censoring? That's false. Next video: rheumatoid arthritis neuropathy and doctors with great success with ivermectin.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

I have three friends who had stage 4 cancer, and now they are cancer-free. They used treatments like Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, and methylene blue, which was originally a textile dye but has shown significant benefits for mitochondria. It's surprising to see effective treatments being overlooked, raising questions about the medical industry's priorities. Why are cures that aren't profitable often ignored or demonized? This situation highlights a failure in our medical institutions to promote genuinely effective solutions.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

I worked in a community hospital that cared for marginalized communities during COVID. I convinced the Chairman of the Board to turn the entire hospital into an ICU to handle the expected surge. Meanwhile, I co-founded the FLCCC with Dr. Paul Maric and Dr. Pierre Kory to develop guidelines and protocols. We had great success using the MAF plus protocol, cortisone-like agents, vitamin C, and repurposed drugs like Ivermectin. My hospital's mortality rate was only 4.4%, much lower than average.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

There are numerous studies showing the significant benefits of Ivermectin, with a 70 to 85% reduction in hospitalizations and deaths. It has been effective worldwide, including in countries like Nigeria, which has the highest burden of river blindness but the lowest COVID death rate. They use both Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Similarly, states in India like Kerala and Uttar Pradesh had comparable death rates by following a protocol that included Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. There are over 400 studies supporting the benefits of hydroxychloroquine and nearly 100 studies showing the devastating benefits of Ivermectin. However, a few government-produced studies financed by Bill Gates and the WHO claim no benefit, but these studies have been criticized.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

I have three friends who had stage 4 cancer, and now they are cancer-free. They used treatments like Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, and methylene blue, which was originally a fabric dye but is now known to have significant effects on mitochondria. It's surprising to discover that many effective treatments are overlooked or demonized, raising questions about the motives behind our medical institutions. Why are these cures not promoted when they are not profitable?

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

I'm Karen DeVore, a dermatologist in South Carolina. I've been prescribing hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin for over 30 years, off-label. In 2020, the FDA called Ivermectin horse medicine and doctors couldn't prescribe it. I knew these drugs were safe and effective, and I saw great results in my patients. None of the patients I treated with these drugs were hospitalized or died from COVID. They had no side effects and felt better within hours. It's frustrating that insurance companies and pharmacies denied access to these drugs. Even terminally ill patients on ventilators couldn't try them. How many lives could have been saved?

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

The United States had the worst COVID management record globally, with 4.2% of the population but 16% of the deaths. Countries using Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, like Nigeria and Japan, had significantly lower death rates compared to the US. Studies consistently show that 85% of the people who died could have been saved with early treatment. Around 650,000 Americans may have died unnecessarily. The origins of the virus, specifically the Wuhan lab and the subsequent cover-up, should be addressed. However, the most important issue is the censorship surrounding COVID.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Over 100 studies have shown that Ivermectin has had significant benefits, reducing hospitalizations and deaths by 70 to 85%. It was effective worldwide, including in Nigeria, where they used it for river blindness and had the lowest COVID death rate. Similarly, states in India like Kerala and Uttar Pradesh used our protocol with Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, ending the pandemic overnight. There are around 400 studies supporting the benefits of hydroxychloroquine and nearly 100 studies showing the devastating benefits of Ivermectin. However, a few government-produced studies financed by Bill Gates and the WHO claim no benefit, but these studies have been criticized.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

I fell for the propaganda and got double vaccinated, only to realize I was misled about ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, masks, and social distancing. I faced censorship, slander, and conspiracy accusations for speaking out. Wikipedia is controlled by intelligence agencies, labeling controversial topics as conspiracy theories.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Patients are dying not from COVID, but from treatments like remdesivir causing organ failure. One person's mother died after being given remdesivir against their wishes, leading to organ shutdown. There was a financial incentive for hospitals to admit patients and put them on ventilators, resulting in unnecessary treatments and deaths.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

I have three friends who had stage 4 cancer, and now they’re cancer-free. They took Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, and Methylene Blue, which has surprising benefits for mitochondria. It’s concerning how effective treatments are often ignored for profit. I got COVID and received remdesivir, which caused severe issues, while a friend died. There’s a troubling trend of prioritizing profit over lives in healthcare. Monoclonal antibodies were restricted to promote vaccines, which raises ethical questions. Mel Gibson and others are starting to speak out against these issues, highlighting the dangers of certain treatments and the need for awareness. We must recognize the importance of sharing knowledge and supporting those who fight against these injustices.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Monoclonal antibodies worked very well and quickly, and were initially readily available. The speaker believes the government intentionally made them harder to get to encourage people to take the COVID shot. The speaker didn't use ivermectin until the government took over distribution of monoclonal antibodies. In March, the government put out information on why people should not take ivermectin for COVID on the FDA's website. At the same time, they launched COVID-nineteen Community Core on 04/01/2021, an $11,500,000,000 slush fund to feed out propaganda.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Ivermectin is a widely used and safe drug that has been effective against SARS CoV 2. It could have saved many lives if it had been used more widely. Doctors who tried to use it faced prosecution, despite its safety and effectiveness. One doctor worked 715 continuous days without a day off because no one else wanted to care for indigent patients. The doctor's hospital had a low mortality rate compared to the rest of the country, thanks to protocols that included Ivermectin. However, the media ignored their success and the use of repurposed drugs. The doctor faced censorship on social media platforms for mentioning Ivermectin. The FDA claims there are no adequate alternatives to the vaccines, but many believe unnecessary deaths occurred due to censorship and lack of access to Ivermectin.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Over 100 studies have shown that Ivermectin has had significant benefits, reducing hospitalizations and deaths by 70 to 85%. It has been widely used around the world, including in Nigeria, where it helped lower the COVID death rate. Kerala and Uttar Pradesh states in India also used Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, effectively ending the pandemic. Numerous studies, including 400 on hydroxychloroquine and nearly 100 on Ivermectin, demonstrate their benefits. However, a few government-funded studies, including those by the WHO and financed by Bill Gates, claim no benefits but have been criticized for their methodology. For more information, you can visit the websites of Dr. Meryl Masse or Yale epidemiologist Harvey Riesch.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

I worked in a small community hospital that cared for marginalized communities during COVID. I convinced the Chairman of the Board to turn the entire hospital into an ICU to handle the expected surge. I also founded the FLCCC with other doctors and developed the MathPlus protocol, which included cortisone agents, vitamin C, thiamine, heparin, and repurposed drugs like Ivermectin. Our success rate was remarkable, with a mortality rate of 4.4% compared to the national average of 25-40%. However, the media never focused on our achievements and I faced censorship on social media platforms. Many people died unnecessarily due to this censorship. The MathPlus protocol, along with good nursing and physician care, helped save lives, especially among indigent individuals who were critically ill when they arrived at the hospital.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

In the discussion, Speaker 0 argues that word-of-mouth PR surrounding ivermectin “saved so many lives” and created widespread distrust in the industry, describing a shift where people questioned official stances: “My oxygen was low, and I did take ivermectin and it did work. Why are they telling me ivermectin doesn't work?” This view frames ivermectin as having proven effectiveness in practice, contrasting with public or institutional statements. Speaker 1 adds that it’s “really hard not to get angry” about the official trials, claiming that the WHO and, specifically, the Oxford trials demonstrated that ivermectin didn’t work, but that it “patently does.” They describe the fundamental problem as the way those trials were conducted, implying methodological issues. They discuss specifics of how the studies tested different drugs: Speaker 0 notes that hydroxychloroquine was given “with food” in the study, while ivermectin was given on an empty stomach, implying a potential misapplication of administration guidelines. They state that Merck’s initial labeling for ivermectin in other indications (scabies and lice) recommends administration with a fatty meal, and share a personal anecdote that their sister introduced ivermectin to the market for lice and conducted a clinical trial with many patients. Speaker 1 questions why leading clinicians would administer these drugs without knowing the correct guidelines, suggesting there should have been knowledge about administration with meals for hydroxychloroquine and with food for ivermectin. They remark, “Why the heck didn’t they know that?” Speaker 0 contends that physicians adhere to guidelines and hospital rules and fear lawsuits; they claim this fear leads to doctors “not even wanna know” certain information. They express the sentiment that the medical community was discouraged or constrained by fear of legal consequences and licensing actions, which contributed to doctors avoiding or stopping certain lines of inquiry or treatment. Overall, the dialogue centers on a perceived discrepancy between real-world outcomes of ivermectin use and official trial conclusions, the role of administration guidelines in trial results, and the influence of fear of legal ramifications on clinical practice.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Monoclonal antibodies worked very well and quickly, and were initially readily available. The speaker believes the government intentionally made them harder to get to encourage people to take the COVID shot. The speaker started using ivermectin when monoclonal antibodies became difficult to obtain. In March, the government put out information on the FDA's website about why people should not take ivermectin for COVID. Simultaneously, the government launched COVID-nineteen Community Core on 04/01/2021, an $11,500,000,000 slush fund for propaganda.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Once it was determined to be safe, the speaker began using a treatment and found that it worked. Over 6,000 patients were treated, and those who received early treatment avoided hospitalization. Some patients came in very sick in their second week, with oxygen saturation in the low 80s, refusing to go to the hospital. The speaker's office offered them the option to possibly die there. They treated these patients with IV steroids, IV antibiotics, home oxygen, and high doses of ivermectin, without using monoclonal antibodies, and the patients were saved.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

I've stated since May 2020 that remdesivir will result in at least 30% death in those who receive it in the hospital. I had data pulled for Medicare patients in New York, and found that 26.9% of those who received remdesivir died. As of October 2020, the cardiovascular toxicology journal found that remdesivir causes death of heart cells and can lead to cardiac arrest. Yet, in December, the NIH decided to update all guidelines for treatment drugs allowed for COVID-19, and remdesivir was the only FDA-approved drug for hospitalized Americans, despite the WHO publishing that it causes increased acute kidney failure. As of January of this year, the FDA extended an emergency use authorization, making remdesivir the only authorized medication that can be administered to newborns to 18-year-olds.

The Joe Rogan Experience

Joe Rogan Experience #1671 - Bret Weinstein & Dr. Pierre Kory

Guests: Bret Weinstein, Dr. Pierre Kory

reSee.it Podcast Summary

Bret Weinstein and Joe Rogan discuss the urgent need for an emergency podcast regarding COVID-19 treatments, particularly focusing on ivermectin. Dr. Pierre Kory, a lung and ICU specialist, introduces himself as part of a group that developed treatment protocols for COVID-19, emphasizing their expertise in ivermectin's use against the virus. Weinstein shares his background as an evolutionary biologist and how he and his wife, Heather, began analyzing COVID-19 data early in the pandemic. They encountered evidence suggesting ivermectin's effectiveness, which led to their discussions and research on the topic. Dr. Kory explains that their group, the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, was formed to create treatment protocols based on extensive research. He mentions initial studies showing ivermectin's efficacy in cell cultures, which prompted some regions to use it clinically despite the lack of human trials at that time. The conversation shifts to the censorship faced by Weinstein and Kory on platforms like YouTube, where their discussions about ivermectin have led to strikes and video removals. They highlight the inconsistency in guidelines from health organizations like the CDC and WHO regarding treatments and vaccinations, particularly around the use of remdesivir and the evolving understanding of airborne transmission of the virus. Dr. Kory points out the disparity between the WHO's recommendations and the evidence supporting ivermectin, noting that the drug is inexpensive and widely available, unlike newer, patented treatments. They express concern over the influence of pharmaceutical companies on treatment guidelines and the potential for profit-driven motives to overshadow public health. Weinstein emphasizes the importance of open discussion in science, arguing that censorship prevents the sharing of critical information that could save lives. They discuss the implications of ignoring effective treatments like ivermectin, particularly in the context of the ongoing pandemic and the need for early intervention. Dr. Kory shares success stories from countries like Mexico and India, where ivermectin has been used effectively to reduce hospitalization and death rates. They stress the need for a coordinated approach to treatment that includes ivermectin and other repurposed drugs. The discussion concludes with a call for transparency and the importance of allowing scientific discourse to flourish without censorship. They express hope that the evidence supporting ivermectin will eventually lead to its broader acceptance and use in treating COVID-19.