reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In the video, the speaker discusses the significant reduction in confirmed influenza cases in the United States and Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic. They mention that in the US, there was a 99.995% reduction in cases, while in Canada, the numbers dropped from 55,379 to 69. The speaker suggests that this may be due to a renaming of cases or the high cycle thresholds used in PCR testing. They also mention discrepancies in reporting and vaccination status data in Newfoundland and Labrador. The speaker notes that all 11 deaths reported in a specific period were fully vaccinated individuals, and they personally know unvaccinated individuals over the age of 70.

The speaker claims that the flu vaccine's purpose has shifted from preventing the flu to only lessening symptoms. A Cleveland Clinic study allegedly found the flu vaccine had a negative efficacy of 26.9% last winter. According to the speaker, this means that individuals who received the flu vaccine were 26.9% more likely to contract influenza. The speaker notes the study doesn't detail the pharmaceutical industry's profits from the vaccine or list its side effects. They state the side effects would be less than an mRNA vaccine, as it is a dead virus vaccine. The speaker reiterates that taking the flu shot allegedly makes one almost 27% more likely to get sick than not taking it.

I have a PhD in virology and immunology. After testing 1500 samples, we found no COVID, only influenza A and B. Other labs confirmed our findings. CDC couldn't provide viable COVID samples. We believe COVID is fictitious, and the 225,000 deaths were due to comorbidities. We are suing the CDC for COVID fraud. The genomic extracts of COVID were not successfully isolated. COVID is just another flu strain, not a real virus.

The video discusses the alleged financial incentives given to hospitals for COVID patients and treatments. It claims that hospitals receive money for each COVID patient admitted, for positive COVID test results, and for using the drug remdesivir. The video suggests that these incentives led to false positives and inappropriate treatments, such as putting patients on ventilators. It also shares personal stories of individuals who experienced mistreatment in hospitals. The video concludes by urging viewers to be cautious and avoid hospitals if possible.

In this video, the speaker discusses their conclusions on all-cause mortality and the pandemic. They claim that if governments had not taken any extraordinary measures, there would have been no excess mortality beyond the usual trend. They argue that the measures implemented by governments caused varying levels of excess mortality in different jurisdictions. Additionally, they assert that the COVID-19 vaccination campaign itself resulted in excess mortality, with different doses and age groups being associated with peaks in deaths. The speaker promises to provide specific numbers in their presentation.

The speaker believes that there is a global crime being committed by those in power who are pretending that there is a serious respiratory viral health threat. They argue that the virus in Wuhan was not exaggerated and that there is no new health threat. They suggest that if there is a new virus, it is not more serious than influenza, which coincidentally disappeared at the same time. The speaker no longer believes in the existence of respiratory viruses and thinks that people still get ill with the same illnesses as before, but the cause is unknown.

The Spanish flu didn't start in Spain, but in the US as a bacterial pneumonia outbreak from a vaccine experiment on soldiers. The Rockefeller Institute led the mass vaccination program, causing the spread of the disease. Survivors became carriers, infecting others. Similarities to COVID-19 include closed societies, shedding, and safety measures for the greater good.

In this video, the speaker presents data on COVID-19 deaths in Canada. They point out that the official number of deaths reported by the government is 52,000, which is used to create fear. However, the speaker reveals that the actual number of deaths is 36,000, as provinces and territories have been adjusting their data to exclude deaths with COVID rather than from COVID. The speaker suggests that this is an attempt to cover up the true impact of the disease.

I've shut down the CDC's flu shot ad campaign and postponed a major vaccine conference to prioritize transparency over pharmaceutical profits. This is part of my plan to dismantle vaccine corruption. The CDC's "mild to wild" flu shot campaign has been canceled, a vaccine advisory conference postponed, and NIH employees fired. This isn't random; it's a deliberate move to expose corruption between big pharma and regulatory agencies. Reports show many severe flu cases occur in vaccinated individuals, with studies suggesting repeated flu shots weaken immunity. Flu vaccine efficacy rates are often low. We've been misled about vaccine immunity versus natural immunity, vitamin D's benefits, and the dangers of mRNA vaccines. If they lied about the flu vaccine and natural alternatives, what else is untrue? It's time to demand independent research and explore natural ways to support our immune systems. This is just the beginning of uncovering the truth about vaccines.

There were two pandemics happening simultaneously: the blue pandemic and the green pandemic. The green pandemic refers to COVID-19, while the blue pandemic is less visible due to the dominance of COVID-19. The speaker wants to understand why there were two pandemics and why only one was widely discussed. They mention that the two pandemics correlate strongly and suggest exploring other phenomena that occurred during this time.

The speaker discusses the correlation between all-cause mortality during the COVID period in the United States and the fraction of the population living in poverty. They explain that this correlation is very strong, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.86. They argue that this correlation suggests that COVID is not the main cause of deaths, as clinical studies indicate that the virus primarily affects elderly individuals. The speaker also mentions that there is no correlation between age and COVID-related deaths, further supporting their claim.

In this video, the speaker reflects on their PowerPoint slide pack from April-May 2020, which contained facts and data about the COVID-19 pandemic. They discuss various points, including the low death rate, the lack of difference between countries with and without lockdowns, the ineffectiveness of masks, and the correlation between flu shots and increased risk of respiratory infections. The speaker emphasizes the importance of not forgetting this information and encourages viewers to share the facts and data to counter mainstream bias. They also express gratitude to their supporters.

Face masks are claimed to be ineffective in preventing influenza transmission and may even spread it. Anthony Fauci, a well-known figure in the field, coauthored a paper discussing how wearing masks during the 1918 pandemic led to bacterial pneumonia and increased deaths. Doctor Scott Atlas, who shares this view, has been censored by Twitter. Recent findings by Laura Ingram's team reveal that flu cases have significantly decreased, with everything now being labeled as COVID. A Danish mask study, which is yet to be published, reportedly found that masks do not protect against COVID. The speaker suggests that there is no real pandemic occurring.

The speaker suggests that there is a global crime being committed by those in power who have exaggerated the threat of a new respiratory virus. They argue that there is no real health threat and that the only moving part in this situation is the PCR test. The speaker questions the existence of respiratory viruses and believes that people still get ill with similar symptoms as before, but the cause is unknown. They conclude that these illnesses are not caused by respiratory viruses.

In this video, the speaker discusses five key points related to the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. Firstly, the speaker mentions that hospital occupancy reached an all-time low in 2020. Secondly, there were fewer respiratory illnesses reported during this time, as COVID-19 replaced the flu. Thirdly, the number of deaths in 2020 was not significantly higher than usual. Fourthly, the average age of those who died from COVID-19 was 83, while the average age of other deceased individuals was 82. Lastly, the World Health Organization (WHO) stated that Sweden, without strict lockdown measures, fared better than Germany. The speaker emphasizes the importance of these facts and criticizes the government's response to the pandemic.

The speaker questions the true cause of the high death toll during the pandemic, suggesting it may not have been due to a deadly disease but rather the measures put in place. They ponder if COVID-19 was just a rebranding of existing illnesses to instill fear and control. The speaker raises concerns about loss of freedom, censorship, and demonization of non-compliant individuals.

The speaker discusses the disappearance of the flu during the COVID-19 pandemic and questions why it was not reported in statistics. They explore various explanations, including the idea that COVID-19 was more contagious and therefore outcompeted the flu. They also mention a study from Harvard suggesting that social distancing and mask-wearing measures effectively eradicated the flu. The speaker raises concerns about the inconsistency in the effectiveness of these measures against COVID-19. They also mention financial incentives for hospitals to diagnose COVID-19 cases, which may have led to misdiagnosis or overreporting. The speaker concludes that corruption and control may be behind these inconsistencies.

In this video, the speaker discusses how certain strains of influenza are not included in PCR tests, such as the BSL 4 strain, h7n9, and h5n1. They question the effectiveness of testing millions of people without being able to detect these specific strains. The speaker also mentions Kristin Drosten and refers to this situation as an "evil genius" move.

The speaker, a former Pfizer employee, claims that the information and safety measures provided by governments regarding the virus are false. They argue that PCR testing is unreliable and that the public should disregard case rates and announcements. They warn of a hidden agenda and urge people to pay attention and take action. The video includes various news clips reporting on COVID-19 cases and deaths. The speaker questions the accuracy of COVID-19 death counts and compares the virus to the flu. They also discuss the lack of flu cases during the pandemic and suggest that flu cases were mislabeled as COVID-19. The speaker criticizes the PCR test and accuses governments of manipulating the results to drive their agenda. They highlight the potential dangers of the vaccines and express skepticism towards the medical establishment. The video concludes with a call to resist fear and manipulation and to seek the truth.

In this video, the speaker discusses five key points regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. Firstly, they mention that hospital occupancy in Germany reached an all-time low in 2020. Secondly, they highlight that there were fewer cases of respiratory diseases, including influenza, during this time. Thirdly, they state that the number of deaths in 2020 was not significantly higher than usual. Fourthly, they mention that the average age of those who died from COVID-19 was 83, while the average age of other deceased individuals was 82. Lastly, they claim that Sweden, without strict lockdown measures, fared better than Germany according to the World Health Organization. The speaker criticizes the government's response to the pandemic, including lockdowns, isolation of the elderly, and the suppression of dissenting voices. They also question the necessity and safety of experimental vaccines. The speaker calls for an investigation into these matters.

The Spanish flu didn't start in Spain and wasn't a flu, but a bacterial pneumonia caused by an experimental vaccine on soldiers in the US. The Rockefeller Institute led the mass vaccination program, with Dr. Frederick Gates overseeing. Survivors spread the bacteria, similar to shedding in COVID-19. Parallels are drawn to current events with Bill Gates and the Rockefeller Initiative. Society closures were justified for safety then and now. Translation: The Spanish flu didn't originate in Spain and was actually caused by a bacterial pneumonia from an experimental vaccine given to soldiers in the US. The Rockefeller Institute led the mass vaccination effort, overseen by Dr. Frederick Gates. Survivors spread the bacteria, similar to shedding in COVID-19. Comparisons are made to current events involving Bill Gates and the Rockefeller Initiative. Society closures were deemed necessary for safety then and now.

The speaker discusses a theory about the funding of the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the origins of the coronavirus. They mention a researcher named Ralph Barrick and his chimeric coronavirus research. They also talk about the US Center for Disease Control filing a patent on the coronavirus and its detection. The speaker suggests that the CDC had control over who could study the virus and profit from it. They imply that there may have been illegal actions involved in the manipulation of the coronavirus for monetary gain.

Scientists and the general public initially followed the guidance of Fauci and the NIH without question, while demonizing those who suggested the Lab Leak theory. However, now the theory is widely accepted, along with many other previously censored conspiracies. People believed they were doing the right thing by following guidelines to stop the spread of the virus, but we need to remember what happened. The speaker emphasizes the importance of not forgetting this playbook for future situations. They mention Bill Gates' actions and how he withdrew his investment in a company and started downplaying the vaccine's effectiveness. They also note the disappearance of the flu and warn against forgetting these events.

The speaker discusses a theory about the funding of the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the origins of the coronavirus. They mention a researcher named Ralph Barrick and his chimeric coronavirus research. They also talk about the US Center for Disease Control filing a patent on the coronavirus and its detection. The speaker suggests that the CDC had control over who could study the virus and profit from it. They imply that there may have been illegal actions involved in the manipulation and patenting of the coronavirus.

The speaker discusses how quick action and isolation could have extinguished COVID-19, citing the success with SARS. They criticize political interference and the WHO for mishandling the pandemic, leading to a global crisis. Despite pointing out these failures, the speaker feels unappreciated for providing factual information.