TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

If the Democrats lose the House, interest in the committee's work may wane. The initial trials will attract significant attention, but as time passes, especially if Democrats are out of power, public interest will likely diminish. The location of the trial is crucial; holding it in D.C. could present challenges due to the jury pool. There’s skepticism about moving the trial, as resistance is expected. The discussion shifts to the lack of a clear plan during the insurrection, highlighting its disorganized nature. Despite the serious implications, there are moments of levity regarding the individuals involved, particularly a known provocateur whose antics are seen as more performative than threatening. The speaker reflects on their personal history with these groups, emphasizing a more nuanced understanding of their motivations.

Is this potentially the biggest setup in the history of the country? It could be. This may be one of the greatest crimes against the American people. It's crucial to uncover the truth, especially regarding the cover-ups that occurred after January 6th. We also need to address the involvement of Republicans in those cover-ups. I understand it’s challenging to confront these issues within your own party, but we must follow the evidence wherever it leads. I will hold you to that commitment.

The speaker discusses the lack of knowledge surrounding the events of January 6th, claiming that the media and political class have focused on it while suppressing alternative narratives. They argue that despite the extensive footage available, there has been no comprehensive timeline of the day. The speaker suggests that January 6th is being used by both the Democratic and Republican parties to achieve their own goals, such as suppressing the population and preventing Donald Trump from running for president again. They highlight a documentary called "January 6th: A True Timeline" that presents a different perspective on the events, including law enforcement being overwhelmed and claims of being set up. The speaker concludes that the public should watch the documentary and draw their own conclusions.

"I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol Building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." "01/06/2021, the media propaganda machine fed us a story that shapes the narrative of insurrection." "They intentionally left out some key details." "There's an entire timeline that you haven't seen and it tells a different story." "They're going into the capital, I think." "It looks like they got sniper rifles." "We want to petition our government for the redress of grievances." "Notice the smoke from the sniper's barrel?" "What do you think that means?" "This is where Joshua Black is shot in the face." "He never saw it coming." "The agitator Landon Copeland admitted to being a member of Antifa just after being sentenced for his involvement." "They're trying to save this guy's life right now."

Officers were assaulted during the Capitol attack, with some still suffering from injuries. The mob can be divided into two categories: those who used violence and those who committed crimes using the access provided. The government has proven the unprovoked attack in court with evidence. The US Attorney's Office has been working tirelessly to bring justice to those responsible. They have reviewed hours of video and digital media to determine charges for each defendant. The process is thorough and respects the rights of witnesses, victims, and defendants. The goal is not to win at all costs, but to ensure due justice for all. This prosecution includes extensive criminal discovery.

The speaker begins by instructing viewers to watch the video in a specific orientation to properly see the content, promising that they will show some footage from January 6 that has not been seen before. They claim that the January 6 pipe bomber was a Capitol Police officer named Shawnee Kirkhoff, and that Kirkhoff was shooting pepper balls at protesters and shot people through the mouth, injuring other protesters as well. The speaker says they will show clips of Capitol Police and MPD (DC Metropolitan Police) officers assaulting people in the crowd, including the speaker themselves, with pepper spray, batons, sticks, and other means. The speaker emphasizes that protesters are heard screaming and begging for the actions to stop. They point out that other MPD and Capitol Police officers are seen waving at these rogue officers who are beating and inciting the crowd, suggesting these could be other CIA agents or other Shawnee Kirkhoff-type plant bombers. These are presented as questions that, according to the speaker, deserve to be asked. A video is to be shown as a snippet of many more to come. The speaker mentions an intention to release a video covering the time frame from 03:55 PM to 04:18 PM, but states that this plan has changed. Instead, they will release the full video in about a week or two and will publish additional small snippets over the next couple of days. The speaker frames this as a sequence of forthcoming releases rather than a single upload. Toward the end, there are brief on-screen audio moments: “Easy on the spray. Stop the spray.” followed by lines that appear to be crowd or mic dialogue, including “Quit fucking o c, miss Ray. Alright. Come on.” These lines serve as short, real-time reactions or commands during the events being referenced. Overall, the speaker asserts that new, previously unseen footage from January 6 will reveal interactions between law enforcement officers and protesters, including alleged misconduct by an identified officer, and raises provocative questions about possible ties to broader covert activity, promising ongoing releases of further clips in the near future.

The January 6th committee's hearings lack cross-examination and anonymity for witnesses, resembling a show trial rather than legitimate hearings. For instance, Cassidy Hutchinson made outrageous claims about Donald Trump attempting to carjack his limo, yet there was no opportunity for cross-examination to challenge her testimony. The Secret Service denied her account, but this information was not presented to the committee or the public. The committee's failure to contact relevant witnesses raises questions about their commitment to uncovering the truth. Instead, the process appears to serve as propaganda, with major news outlets promoting it without scrutiny. This has been an ongoing issue for months.

The January 6th committee wanted to present the compelling information they had gathered to the American people. They brought in a former president of ABC News to help with storytelling for a mass audience. He envisioned the committee's work as a miniseries with 9 episodes focusing on different themes. The first hearing was a defining moment in American history and was broadcasted in prime time. The committee wanted to make sure the presentation grabbed and held the audience's attention. Chairman Thompson emphasized the need for it to "pop."

There may be cameras in the courtroom for state proceedings, at the judge's discretion. Trump benefits from the optics, as viewers will either be enraged or thrilled. The presence of James and Trump in the background and foreground, respectively, fuels the narrative on both sides. Trump is facing a series of prosecutions and civil lawsuits before the election, with prosecutors pushing for trials to happen quickly.

Good morning, everyone. I'm on my way to the Commonwealth Court in Harrisburg for a hearing at 9:30 AM regarding our whistleblower case against Kathy Bookbar. This appeal, which we've awaited for three years, involves evidence from a sting operation during the 2020 election that exposed public officials committing felonies. We fought for oral arguments, which we won, and the hearing will be live-streamed. Thank you to everyone for your support; we ask for your prayers today. We will discuss obstruction of justice and the lack of forensic analysis on our evidence, despite the closure of criminal investigations. We believe there was election fraud in 2020, and we will continue to fight for the truth. Please share this video and tune in to the live hearing. God bless.

If the Democrats lose the House and the committee disbands, interest may wane. The initial trials will attract significant attention, but after a change in power, the focus will likely diminish. The location of the trial is crucial; moving it could face resistance. There's skepticism about the planning behind the January 6th events, as it lacked military-like organization. It was a poorly executed insurrection, with no weapons involved. There’s a sense of irony in the portrayal of figures like Gavin McGinnis, who, despite being provocative, is now seen in a serious light. The speaker reflects on their past experiences with these individuals, emphasizing a disconnect between their past and current narratives.

The first hearing will focus on the events of January 6 themselves, a Capitol police officer who was in the midst of the violence, Caroline Edwards, a documentary filmmaker embedded with the insurrection. That's Nick Quested. His footage and we're gonna see a lot of video footage, some never before seen. His footage is like the Watergate tapes. It's a real time accounting of what happened.

Thompson's committee gathered compelling information and brought in a former ABC News president to present it effectively. They envisioned the investigation as a miniseries with 9 episodes covering specific themes. The first hearing, a prime time event, aimed to emphasize the importance of the investigation. The stakes were high, and the team worked hard to engage the audience. The hearing began with anticipation, hoping to capture and maintain viewers' attention. Chairman Thompson emphasized the need for the presentation to be impactful.

The speaker contends that a show has been created and that it has affected millions of Americans. They argue that those involved are trying to tarnish the memory of certain people and that this aligns with what the government does. The speaker asserts that those people were aware that the January 6 event in Washington, DC involved far more than a few thousand people and claims it involved millions. They state that the majority of the individuals now in jail were defending bodies and Americans who were murdered, and that those people believed the story would be twisted and that the American people would accept it. The speaker asks why this is being done and suggests there is a manipulation or programming at work, implying that people have been conditioned to want to kill each other. They conclude that this is something that must stop.

The transcript covers the January 6, 2021 events at the Capitol, detailing the sequence from the march to the Capitol to the initially escalating and then intensified police response. - At the outset, a speaker calls on Congress to confront an “egregious assault on our democracy,” and asserts that the crowd will walk down to the Capitol to demand that Congress “only count the electors who have been lawfully slated.” A promise is made that participants will march to the Capitol “peacefully and patriotically” to have their voices heard. - Around 12:30 PM, a large group is seen heading toward the Capitol from eastbound Pennsylvania Avenue. A speaker notes that President Trump “won’t be finished speaking at the Ellipse for another forty minutes.” There is mention that Mike Pence “has to agree to send it back.” - By 12:45 PM, footage shows a wall of people arriving about a block west of the Capitol, gathering at Peace Circle where Pennsylvania Avenue ends and becomes Pennsylvania Walkway, leading to the West Side of the Capitol. A security camera view from the exterior dome shows the crowd rapidly filling the area in front of the West Plaza, with those entering Capitol grounds potentially seeing no prior warnings or barriers. - Inside the Capitol, Vice President Mike Pence enters the House chamber to convene the joint session to certify electoral votes, while President Donald Trump continues speaking at the Ellipse, seemingly unaware of the crowd at the Capitol. Outside, DC Capitol Police Deputy Chief Waldo orders the less-lethal team into position. - A sequence of tactical movements follows: a request for less-lethal teams to move up from the Upper West Terrace and an elevated position being prepared. The team is described as “not compliant.” Less-lethal munitions are discussed, with multiple warnings reportedly given, though some warnings are not captured on video. - President Trump finishes his speech at the Ellipse around 01:12 PM. A split-screen view shows simultaneous events in real time. - A separate exchange references the objection from Arizona, with “Is the objection in writing and signed by a senator?” answered “Yes. It is.” Representatives Gosar and Senator Ted Cruz then make a challenge on the floor of the House. - At 01:13 PM, MPD officer Daniel Thou arrives at the southwest plaza with a body camera showing him and nearby officers spraying demonstrators with an inflammatory agent. By 01:15 PM, Thou crosses the line, engages with demonstrators, discharges two rounds from his taser (ECD), and then urges others to “start shooting what they have into the crowd.” - The less-lethal team fires into the crowd for a third time at 01:17 PM. A second wave of DC Metropolitan Police officers arrives on the East Side of the Capitol, bringing explosive ammunition rounds that will be distributed to West Plaza officers. Officer Tara Tindle crouches on the ground, readying CS gas rounds. A scene commander authorizes explosive deployment into the crowd. - By 01:30 PM, officers push the crowd back and establish a police line on the Southwest side, which is held for about an hour. Officers deploy “Steamboat” rounds and other munitions as the crowd is contained. - Around 01:32 PM, an officer laments that throwing grenades into the crowd will make things worse, but moments later another officer seems to change course and reaches for additional munitions. Discussions about using triple chasers and the risks of fire are noted, with one officer being reprimanded for earlier smoke deployment. - A captain directs Officer Thao to hold off discharging CS gas, while Thao acquires a Stinger round and a baton round to fire into the crowd. At 02:18 PM, a tense officer-to-officer exchange reveals acknowledgment that innocent people are being affected, with one officer stating, “Nothing's gonna help… we're taking out one and ten of them are getting way easier,” and that the crowd is being multiplied by being hit.

The speaker states that they will release the 14,000 hours of hidden tapes to provide a more complete understanding of the events of that day. They believe that the January 6 committee selectively chose moments to create division in the country. The speaker believes that this deal includes a concession to reveal the truth to the American people.

Peter Ticton, a former courtroom trial lawyer and founder of the Law Group, reveals that he has access to video evidence of government employees planning the events of January 6th. These employees, who were not identified, were collaborating on Zoom meetings to orchestrate the takeover of the building. Ticton emphasizes that January 6th was not a spontaneous event but rather a premeditated plan. He does not disclose the specific identities of these government employees but asserts that they were not FBI agents or politicians.

The select committee to investigate the January 6th attack on the United States capital will be in order. The goal was to create a presentation that would grab the audience. The committee had gathered a trove of information, and the challenge was what to do with it. The information was compelling, and the aim was to tell that to the American people in a compelling way. That's why a former president of ABC News was brought in. The January 6th committee wanted a storyteller.

The transcript presents a detailed narrative and timeline of January 6, 2021, at the U.S. Capitol, emphasizing the sequence of events, key actors, and the evolving security dynamic as the day unfolded. - Preceding the day, hundreds of peaceful rallies followed the November 2020 election. Polls showed concern about election irregularities in key states; none of these rallies were violent. On January 6, crowds gathered around multiple areas in Washington, DC, with the Ellipse hosting President Trump’s speech, and other groups assembling on the West and East sides of the Capitol and nearby locations. The mood of the crowd at morning events is described as joyful and hopeful, viewing it as the last chance to see the president’s national address. - Around 11:41 AM, Ryan Samsell (spelled Samsal in some segments) crosses an intersection with officers; Michael Sherwin, the acting U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, is seen crossing the same intersection and would later lead investigations of Samsel and others. Four minutes later, officers respond to a report of a gun and question a person with a knife; he is released after it is determined there is no firearm. - Trump’s speech timeline: at about 15 minutes into his remarks, Trump mentions that after the speech they will walk to the Capitol. He says, “we’re gonna walk down to the capital,” and reiterates a call to count only lawfully slated electors. He suggests marching “peacefully and patriotically.” Fifteen minutes into his remarks, a group including Proud Boys is seen heading toward the Capitol, flanked by DC Metropolitan Police. - The crowd moves: about 12:04 PM, demonstrators including Proud Boys walk west on Constitution Avenue toward 1st Street, flanked by police. A lunch stop occurs around 12:30 PM as the group, previously flanked, appears to pause near the Department of Labor. - By 12:35-12:36 PM, Pence’s motorcade arrives at the Capitol, in advance of the 1 PM certification. A crowd already forms at barricades on the East Plaza as Pence arrives. Shortly after, Trump’s remarks are referenced in real time as the Ellipse speech concludes. - The first major breach occurs as barricades are breached: Samsell (Samsel) is seen near a barricade; Ray Epps is observed directing demonstrators toward the Capitol. A barrier is pushed into the police line, knocking a police officer (Caroline Edwards) to the ground, initiating the first violent skirmish. - By 12:58 PM, a West Lawn fence is down; five Capitol Police officers guard the area behind barricades, while a Black ski-masked individual removes a barrier and leads crowds toward the West Lawn. Samsell and Epps are repeatedly seen near barricades as the crowd pushes forward. - A man named Benjamin Phillips collapses on the West Plaza around 12:59 PM; responders assist him, and he dies later that day. Inside the Capitol, Vice President Pence is in the House chamber for the electoral vote certification. - The Capitol Police deploy less-lethal munitions beginning around 1:06 PM. At 1:12 PM, Trump finishes his Ellipse remarks; a split-screen real-time view shows concurrent events around the Capitol. At 1:13 PM, Officer Thao requests more munitions and later fires a Taser (ECD). The first use of a chemical agent is reported, and the crowd’s advance continues toward the interior. - By 1:21 PM, the first explosive munition is discharged; rubber bullets, tear gas, and incendiaries hit the crowd in rapid succession for about an hour. At 1:28 PM, a man collapses; CPR is attempted. A person named Roseanne Boylan later dies from injuries sustained in the crush. - The West Plaza portion of the Capitol sees a collapse of the police line; by 1:38–1:41 PM, Trump tweets urging peace; Ray Epps is frequently seen near the front lines as demonstrators enter the West Plaza area and push past police barriers. - Around 1:50 PM, CS gas is deployed in the Northwest side, causing police to retreat; demonstrators advance toward the Capitol interior. A key development: the West Terrace tunnel becomes a focal point as police retreat behind double doors, shortening the line and creating a bottleneck for the crowd. - By 2:16–2:18 PM, doors to the Capitol open from the inside, and MPD reinforcements begin to arrive. The Senate and House debate on the Arizona electoral objection continues as demonstrators move through the building, including into the Senate chamber where desks and the dais are examined. - At 2:24 PM, Trump tweets that Pence lacked the courage to do what should have been done to protect the country, which later drew attention from investigators. A misfire of CS gas by a DC officer leads to a dispersal collapse of the West Plaza line, and the crowd surges into the Capitol interior. - In the Capitol Rotunda and Senate chamber, demonstrators roam and occupy spaces; Jacob Chanceley is seen in the Senate chamber, and threats to security escalate as officers and demonstrators contend in multiple locations. - At 3:19 PM, police expel demonstrators from the tunnel; a US Capitol Police officer is dragged into the crowd but returns to the line. By 4:17 PM, Trump posts a one-minute video urging peaceful departure; Twitter adds a warning label and later removes the video. - At 5 PM, curfew is announced; tear gas is used to drive remaining demonstrators from upper levels; National Guard troops begin to arrive. At 8 PM, the Capitol is declared secure, and the session resumes later that night with the Arizona vote certification. - The narration closes with a reflection on the day’s legacy, noting that fourteen days later, Joe Biden would be inaugurated, and asking whether the public’s understanding of January 6 has progressed toward a fuller timeline and context.

The speaker presents seven core points about the January 6 investigations and related prosecutions. 1) Original sins of government and due process concerns - The lawless formation of the House Select Committee on January 6 led to a one-sided, due process-free process. - The committee was gerrymandered by Speaker Pelosi, operated without a ranking member or counsel for the ranking member, and Liz Cheney was granted vice chair status to cover that up. - The committee conducted scripted hearings with prewritten Q&A paths and cherry-picked, highly edited audio and video. 2) Collaboration with mainstream media and narrative shaping - The committee worked with major outlets (The New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC) to blast a narrative of an insurrection. - The speaker claims secretly recorded video shows Nancy Pelosi, her daughter, and friends admitting no real insurrection occurred. - The combined effect of the committee’s conduct and the media blitz allegedly poisoned the jury pool in Washington, DC, and suggested that venue transfers should have been permitted. 3) Fourth Amendment concerns and the dragnet - Many defendants were swept up in a broad dragnet that the speaker believes resembled a general warrant violating the Fourth Amendment. - This involved geofencing technology and cell phone data warrants to telecom providers. - People arriving after the speech and the ellipse allegedly did not see that areas normally open to the public were closed, creating a trespass trap for the unwary. 4) First Amendment rights and unequal treatment - The Department of Justice did not treat First Amendment rights of the protesters with appropriate respect. - The speaker contrasts the January 6 cases with the 2020 Portland protests, where nightly attacks on federal courthouses and antifa/BLM activity were characterized differently. - The speaker asserts that insurrection labeling in Portland was more applicable to those actions than to the largely spontaneous January 6 crowd, implying selective enforcement. 5) Selective prosecution and unequal treatment - The January 6 defendants have not been treated the same as Antifa and BLM protesters in 2020 who damaged property and threatened the White House. - The speaker calls this a flat violation of equal protection of the laws and suggests broad public belief in selective prosecution. 6) Brady violations and exculpatory evidence - Widespread Brady violations are alleged, focusing on two areas: concealed or underreported footage of the Capitol, and the large number of unreleased January 6 committee deposition transcripts (over 800), with the possibility that exculpatory evidence remains unseen by defendants and their lawyers. - The committee allegedly acted like a star chamber, and there is concern that not all exculpatory material has been made available. 7) Judicial influence and misapplication of obstruction statutes - DC federal judges are said to have been influenced by the January 6 committee’s narrative and the mainstream media. - A statute designed to close an obstruction-of-justice loophole from Arthur Andersen/Enron is claimed to be applied to activity that in many instances is protected by the First Amendment, with unequal sentencing: Antifa and BLM defendants allegedly receiving lighter outcomes or settlements, while January 6 defendants face disproportionate sentences. - The speaker concludes by expressing disagreement with the overall approach and intention to speak on these concerns.

Is this potentially the biggest setup in U.S. history? It could be one of the greatest crimes against the American people. It's crucial to uncover the truth, especially regarding the cover-ups after January 6th. What about the Republicans involved in those cover-ups? Addressing that is challenging since it's within your own party. However, we will follow the evidence wherever it leads, regardless of the implications. I’ll hold you to that commitment.

We're diving into the January 6th select committee, which has not been truthful with the American people. The events of January 6th were indeed bad, with assaults on law enforcement being unacceptable. However, the narrative pushed by Democrats over the past four years is false and exaggerated. We aim to clarify what really happened and investigate why President Biden pardoned members of the committee. Since they are pardoned, they must testify, especially those no longer in office. Expect subpoenas to be issued soon.

The select committee investigating the January 6th Capitol attack aimed to present compelling information to the American people. To achieve this, they enlisted a former ABC News president as a storyteller. The committee wanted to ensure their presentation would captivate the audience and effectively convey the gathered information.

Is this the biggest setup in U.S. history? It could be. This situation represents a significant crime against the American people. It's crucial to uncover the truth, especially regarding the cover-ups that followed January 6th. There are also Republicans involved in these cover-ups, which complicates the discussion. Despite party affiliations, we must pursue the evidence wherever it leads. I will hold you accountable for that commitment.