reSee.it - Related Video Feed

During the 2022 election in Arizona, numerous irregularities were found. One example is a ballot envelope of a deceased voter that passed without challenge. Over 800 blank ballots with no signature were also counted, which violates state statutes. Additionally, there were voter registration files with incorrect signatures. The tabulators used in Maricopa County did not meet the required error rate, averaging 235 times higher than the standard. This led to the rejection of over a quarter of a million ballots due to feed errors. These issues highlight the problems in the election process.

The Arizona Republican Party filed a lawsuit against the state's secretary of state for having 500,000 to 1.3 million ineligible voters on the rolls. The lawsuit revealed dead people and non-residents on the voter rolls, with some counties having more registered voters than eligible citizens. This highlights the need for election integrity. Republicans must address this issue before the upcoming elections to prevent cheating. It is crucial to purge voter rolls of deceased individuals to ensure fair elections. Democrats may argue otherwise, but it is clear that dead voters should not be on the rolls.

In Arizona, there was a request to move the voter registration date to election day, but it was moved back to October 15th due to a court case. We found 3,981 individuals who registered after October 15th but their data shows that they have already voted in this election.

42,000 people in Nevada voted more than once, 1,500 were deceased, 19,000 didn't live in Nevada, 8,000 had non-existent addresses, 15,000 were registered at commercial or vacant addresses, and 4,000 were non-citizens. The speaker asked about voter fraud prosecutions in Nevada, to which the response was not yet.

There are 74,243 mail-in ballots in Arizona with no clear record of being sent. In Arizona, EB32 forms track when mail-in ballots are sent, while EB33 forms track when they are received. Ideally, there should be more EB32s than EB33s, indicating that more ballots are sent out than returned. The issue arises with these 74,000 ballots, as we cannot confirm they were ever sent to the individuals listed.

Over 1,500,000 fraudulent votes counted, and the spread is less than 82,000 votes. These fraudulent votes come from dead voters, ballots that were received before they were supposedly mailed out, and over 330,000 electronic spikes from the voting machine. 205,000 over votes, meaning there were 205,000 more votes than registered voters, and 682,000 ballots that were illegally processed without any oversight whatsoever. More than 1,500,000 votes in Pennsylvania is apparently what it took for Joe Biden to steal the state. Georgia has a similar phenomenon that Democrats are failing to account for. 66,248 underage voters voted in Georgia. 10,315 dead people voted. 2,500 convicted felons voted. Nearly 200,000 votes were fraudulently inserted into the vote instantaneously. 4,500 votes come from unregistered voters. These numbers show a clear pattern that a variety of types of fraud occurred in this election and that Democrats are desperately trying to cover it up. They're going to great lengths to change the narrative of the election fraud in an effort to run up the clock to 01/20/2020. In addition to president Trump's team, many independent groups have completed research on the fraud and the results are staggering. Totaling across the country, millions of votes were fraudulently covered up, changed, or deleted in favor of Joe Biden. The governors and secretaries of state have actively participated in the cover up. Removing information from their website that is normally easily accessible to the public and depriving conservatives a chance to audit or review the results are just some of their tactics. In Arizona, the final result is only a difference of 10,457, yet 36,400 non citizens voted in the state. Arizona also experienced phantom spikes from the voting machines to the tune of roughly 50,000 additional votes going to Joe Biden. These numbers come from information that is publicly available, whether from the secretary of state's website before the content was removed or from the raw data that was pushed out on election night.

North Carolina, there are significant issues with voter registrations. Since the start of the year, there have been 499,566 total registrations. Notably, 110,462 lack information on race, sex, or ethnicity. Additionally, 149,699 do not have a North Carolina driver's license or ID, and 274,589 have no recorded birth state. This raises concerns about the integrity of the registration process.

Maricopa County reported over 923,000 ballots dropped in drop boxes during the 2020 election. However, documentation accounts for only 189,167 ballots, leaving a deficit of 733,000 ballots. This indicates the election was not secure, and there are problems with the process. Laws were not adhered to or complied with. All evidence has been turned over to the attorney general. Every Democrat voted no in committee.

There are 74,243 mail-in ballots in Arizona without a clear record of being sent. In Arizona, there are supposed to be records (EB32s and EB33s) of when a mail-in ballot is sent and received. The number of EB32s should be higher than the number of EB33s. However, in this case, there are more ballots received than there are records of being sent. These ballots can be linked to specific individuals, but it is unclear if they were actually sent to them.

We found 74,243 mail-in ballots in Arizona with no record of being sent. In Arizona, EB32s track when ballots are sent, and EB33s track when they are received. There should be more EB32s than EB33s. These ballots were tied to specific individuals, but we lack proof they were sent to them.

Concerns have arisen about noncitizens voting in Arizona's elections, particularly regarding 218,000 voters who were improperly recorded as having provided proof of citizenship. This issue stems from long-time residents who obtained driver's licenses before citizenship requirements were enforced. The Arizona Supreme Court has ruled that these individuals are eligible to vote. Addressing the belief that noncitizens are voting in large numbers will be challenging, and it's likely this narrative will continue to surface after the election, regardless of the outcome.

In Arizona, there are 74,243 mail-in ballots with no clear record of being sent. The state uses EB32 forms to track when ballots are sent and EB33 forms for when they are received. Ideally, there should be more EB32s than EB33s, indicating that more ballots are sent out than returned. These ballots can be linked to specific individuals, but in this case, there is no confirmation that these 74,000 ballots were ever sent to them.

42,000 people in Nevada voted more than once, 1,500 were deceased, 19,000 didn't live in Nevada or attend college, 8,000 voted from non-existent addresses, 15,000 were registered at vacant addresses, and 4,000 were noncitizens. The speaker questions if any prosecutions are happening in Nevada for the 130,000 instances of voter fraud identified in the 2020 election. No prosecutions have been reported yet.

42,000 people in Nevada voted more than once, 1,500 were deceased, 19,000 didn't live in Nevada or attend college, 8,000 voted from a non-existent address, 15,000 were registered to vacant addresses, and 4,000 were noncitizens. The speaker asks if there are any ongoing prosecutions for voter fraud in Nevada, given the 130,000 instances identified in the 2020 election. The response is that there are currently no prosecutions.

In the 2020 election, Maricopa County reported 923,000 drop box ballots, but only 189,167 have documentation. This leaves 733,000 ballots unaccounted for. The election was not secure as claimed, with many process issues and non-compliance with laws. Evidence has been given to the attorney general, with all Democrats voting against in committee.

Ramin begins by noting that California said 657,000 people voted in Riverside County on Prop 50, but the registrar’s handwritten logs show 611,000 ballots came through the door—a gap of 45,896 ballots. He adds that a sheriff, sworn in with a badge and a court-issued warrant, says he’ll count those ballots himself, and the California attorney general “loses his mind” over the idea of stopping someone from counting paper. Speaker 1 clarifies the numbers: the registrar of voters’ logs show 611,428 ballots cast, while 657,322 votes were reported and certified to the secretary of state, a difference of 45,896 votes. Ramin uses a simple analogy to illustrate the discrepancy: if you squeeze 20 lemons and sell cups all afternoon, but someone later claims 28 cups were sold, eight cups exceed the supply. He says this is the gist of Riverside’s situation: 611,000 ballots entered, 657,000 votes certified, and a 45,896-vote gap, which he calls unacceptable. He emphasizes that this is not a local school board vote, but Gavin Newsom’s Prop 50, officially called the Election Rigging Response Act. Prop 50 gave Sacramento the power to overturn California’s independent redistricting commission and redraw all 52 congressional districts to benefit Democrats, with maps crafted by Democratic operatives and in effect through 2030. It passed statewide 64% to 36, with over 8,000,000 votes cast. Ramin notes that while the phantom Riverside votes did not flip the statewide result, the point is about potential partisan impact: Republicans currently hold the House by six seats, and California’s new maps are designed to flip five of those seats. He mentions representatives Kevin Kiley and Darrell Issa as examples of Republicans in districts that were redrawn to become more favorable to Democrats. If Democrats flip those seats in November 2026, they would take back the House. Buried within the election that made all of this possible is the 45,000-vote gap in a single county. He extrapolates: if Riverside County’s 7% turnout were representative of all 8,000,000 statewide votes, that could imply over 500,000 “ghost votes.” He explicitly says he is not asserting that this happened and that nobody knows, because no… (the excerpt ends abruptly).

Speaker 0 presents a sequence of figures regarding Maricopa County’s 2020 election and asserts inconsistency between tallies and ballots. He begins: there were 2,595,272 registered voters; 2,089,512 voted at the close of business through election night and all counting; yet there were only 1,923,693 ballots existing. He notes, “They called the election at 2,089,512 votes,” but emphasizes that the closing canvas shows a different number, counting the actual codes on paper rather than pieces of paper, yielding 1,923,693 numbers that show up. After post-adjudication, he lists key observations. By the time voting closed, 165,819 ballots were missing, which he states is 7.94% of the votes in 2020, and they could not explain where they were. However, about a month later in Arizona, a new total was produced: 2,086,959, still leaving 2,553 ballots missing as of that adjustment. He notes that Biden was said to have won by 10,500 votes. He then describes a process he calls the “time hack,” alleged to have been used to gain extra counting time—a practice he claims is new to 2020 and has continued in subsequent elections. He asserts that they “picked up, i.e., manufactured 163,266 ballots that never existed.” He questions how ballots could enter the system after the fact if they did not exist beforehand, asserting this as evidence of manipulation. To support the claim, he cites machine outputs: “Maricopa printed 04/7968 ballots for Maricopa,” while there were only 2,595,272 registered voters, yet 4,027,968 ballots printed. He states these numbers come directly from the machines and argues that no one scrutinizes them deeply enough. He asks why Maricopa would print 1,432,696 overprints, suggesting that to fabricate missing numbers, “backwards ballots” are needed to fill those gaps during the time hack. The argument continues that ballots must be suspended from hitting the bottom line—“don’t let them hit the bottom line”—and, once the numbers are known, could be replaced with whatever is needed. He implies that such suspended ballots are not present in either the pre- or post-audit tallies. Finally, he asserts that a proper audit would have all numbers cross-referencing across every manifestation; otherwise, the cross-referencing would reveal the inconsistencies. The overall gist is a claim of missing ballots, late adjustments, a large number of overprints, and a so-called time hack used to manipulate counts, with an emphasis on the need for cross-referenced auditing.

In the 2020 election, Maricopa County reported 923,000 drop box ballots, but only 189,167 have documentation, leaving 733,000 unaccounted for. This shows election insecurity. Evidence was given to the attorney general, with all Democrats voting against in committee.

In Arizona, there are 74,243 mail-in ballots without a clear record of being sent. The state uses EB32s to track when a ballot is sent and EB33s to track when it is received. The number of EB32s should be higher than the number of EB33s. These 74,000 ballots can be linked to specific individuals, but there is no evidence that they were actually sent to them.

Maricopa County reported over 923,000 ballots deposited in drop boxes during the 2020 election. However, documentation accounts for only 189,167 ballots, leaving a deficit of 733,000 ballots. This indicates the election was not secure, with process problems and a failure to adhere to laws. All evidence has been given to the attorney general. Every Democrat voted no in committee.

In 2020, Maricopa, Arizona, experienced an unusually high adjudication rate, with one out of every eight ballots cast being modified. This is almost 12 times the historical average for ballot modifications in the county. Overall, there were 235,367 individual ballots that were changed either by a human or machine after they were initially cast.

Did you see the comparison of voter turnout from 2012 to 2024? It's surprising. In 2020, the number of people who voted was unprecedented, significantly higher than in previous elections. While 2012 and 2016 had consistent turnout around 65 million, 2020 saw a dramatic increase, with about 81 million votes for Biden. This election was one of the most consequential, with people deeply divided—some viewing him as a savior, others as a threat. The turnout reflects a heightened engagement compared to past elections, indicating a major shift in voter participation.

In Arizona, there are 74,243 mail-in ballots with no clear record of being sent. The state uses EB32s to track when a mail-in ballot is sent and EB33s to track when it is received. Ideally, there should be more EB32s than EB33s, indicating that more ballots are sent out than returned. These ballots can be linked to specific individuals, but in this case, there is no clear indication that these 74,000 ballots were ever sent.

We found 74,243 mail-in ballots in Arizona with no clear record of being sent. In Arizona, EB32s show when a ballot is sent, and EB33s show when it's received. There should be more EB32s than EB33s. These ballots can be linked to specific individuals, but 74,000 came back without proof of being sent to them.

Around 6,000 people have been identified with switched registrations, but it doesn't mean all of them have been confirmed. They are currently under investigation. However, what's interesting is that there were groups of registered Democrats or NPAs who suddenly switched to Republican around the same time.