reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Quan et al demonstrated that the introduction of DNA into a cell, even without integration, can trigger the oncogenic cGAS-STING pathway. The speaker claims that the presence of an SV40 origin of replication, a mammalian origin, in a vaccine grown in E. coli is reckless because it allows the plasmid DNA to replicate episomally in the host. The speaker alleges evidence suggests Pfizer, unlike Moderna, may have included this origin of replication due to carelessness. The speaker highlights concerns about nucleic acid persistence, noting that RT-PCR methods used in studies like Krausson and Rolchen may have amplified both DNA and RNA. The speaker suggests that prior studies assumed detected nucleic acids were RNA, but that further investigation using primers specific to the plasmid backbone might reveal the presence of residual plasmid DNA. The Krausson paper found nucleic acids present for thirty days in heart tissues, and the Rolchen paper found them for sixty days.

Speaker 0 argues that because it’s classified as a vaccine, they don’t have to worry about being sued. Speaker 1 counters that there is immunity from liability dependent on there having been no fraud, and asserts that there clearly was fraud, so in light of that... Speaker 0 expresses surprise at known caveats to liability. Speaker 1 confirms the caveats and says it makes the situation more interesting. Speaker 0 asks how fraud is defined in this context, noting that drugs were sold with many studies but only one was good. Speaker 1 responds, “Let's try this one,” and discusses safety testing: the insufficient amount of safety testing before release was done with mRNA vaccines produced in a process that did not involve DNA. The product injected into billions of people involved DNA plasmids, with massive contamination in the shots actually delivered, including the SV40 promoter (simian virus 40). The point is that safety testing was performed on one process, but people were injected with something different that had other components not tested, which Speaker 1 calls fraudulent. Speaker 0 asks for an explanation of the SV40 issue. Speaker 1 explains production methods: techniques to generate product using a plasmid, a circular piece of DNA, allowing vats to grow the product before coating in lipid nanoparticle, with bacteria doing the work. There is a requirement to purify DNA and set standards for residual DNA contamination. In this case, not only was quality control poor, but there was a much more painstaking way to produce the same product that did not involve DNA plasmids at all. As a result, vials given to Kevin McKernan, containing material actually injected into people, showed DNA contamination across the board. Speaker 1 states that leftover DNA includes the SV40 promoter, a genetic trigger from simian virus 40, which is carcinogenic. This promoter is left over in vials from shots actually injected into people, implying that the claims about the potential for mRNA shots to integrate into the genome were incorrect. Speaker 1 asserts that there is DNA in the vials, not just some old DNA, and that it includes the SV40 promoter, a genetic engineering tool with carcinogenic potential. Therefore, Speaker 1 concludes, this seems to be clear fraud: you can’t inject a different product into the public on the basis of safety testing conducted with a product produced by a different process.

Moderna holds a patent for using RNA in vaccines, acknowledging that RNA is superior to DNA due to concerns about DNA-related problems like insertional immunogenesis and genotoxicity. The FDA claims to be unaware of any issues, but Moderna's own patent raises the same concerns about DNA. It appears that DNA is present in the RNA preparation as a contaminant, as it is used in the process of making RNA. Recent findings by scientists revealed large numbers of DNA fragments in the RNA preparation, including sequences that are not normally allowed in human use, such as an antibiotic resistance gene and sequences from simian virus 40. These DNA fragments can potentially lead to DNA damage, birth defects, and cancer.

The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines contain fragments of DNA, which can integrate into the genomic DNA of cells and become a permanent part of the cell. This poses a potential risk of autoimmune attacks and future cancer. The DNA contamination occurred during the production process, where a plasmid vector was used to scale up the production of the RNA template. The regulatory threshold for DNA in vaccines is outdated and not suitable for this new type of vaccine. The speaker believes that DNA sequencing should be done on vaccinated individuals' stem cells to determine if this theoretical risk has occurred. Informed consent is necessary, and the lack of transparency regarding the DNA contamination is concerning.

Moderna holds a patent for using RNA in vaccines, acknowledging that RNA is better than DNA due to concerns about DNA-related problems like insertional immunogenesis and genotoxicity. The FDA claims to be unaware of these concerns, but Moderna's own patent highlights them. The presence of DNA in the vaccines is considered a contaminant, as it is used in the process of making RNA. Recent findings by scientists in the US and Canada revealed large amounts of DNA fragments in the RNA preparation, including sequences not allowed for human use, such as an antibiotic resistance gene and sequences from simian virus 40. These DNA fragments pose risks of DNA damage, including birth defects and cancer.

Mr. Kevin McKernan, a former leader at the Human Genome Project, discussed DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. He highlighted the risks of insertional mutagenesis and integration into the genome, contradicting regulators' claims of little consequence. The DNA, found in lipid nanoparticles, can enter cells and potentially contribute to cancer. McKernan emphasized the inadequacy of current monitoring methods and called for a review of regulatory practices. The presence of DNA in these vaccines challenges existing safety standards and raises concerns about long-term effects.

Many labs, including Medicinal Genomics, found DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines. Regulators like the FDA and EMA admitted to this, but downplayed its significance. The SP 40 sequences omitted by Pfizer are crucial. DNA contamination can cause insertional mutagenesis, as stated in Moderna's patents. Regulatory agencies were deceived and failed to properly address the issue. This poses a serious risk that cannot be ignored.

Speaker 1 reports evidence from multiple sources, including InModia lab in Germany and John Cantazaro at NEO7 Bioscience, that Pfizer and Moderna code is reverse transcribed and inserted into human DNA. According to Speaker 1, this means individuals could carry a "stamp" of Pfizer or Moderna in their genome. The speaker suggests the body may not be editing out or repressing this code, as spike protein evidence persists for years. Transmission of spike protein producing genetic code is possible, along with fragments of code for the spike protein, SV40, and other DNA fragments. Speaker 1 raises concerns about potential health issues like blood clots, heart damage, autoimmunity, and unusual tumors. John Cantazaro's research indicates a dramatically altered genetic profile in vaccinated individuals, tilting towards neoplasm or cancer. Speaker 1 shares an anecdote about a patient who developed terminal cancer after vaccination, with Cantazaro confirming the presence of Pfizer code in the patient's genome.

The speaker discusses DNA contamination found in Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines, highlighting regulatory agencies' failure to address the issue. They mention potential risks of DNA integration and cancer development, urging for a review of regulatory practices. Concerns are raised about DNA levels exceeding limits, potential cell integration, and long-term presence in the body. The speaker emphasizes the need for better monitoring tools and the unique nature of DNA contamination in these vaccines.

Recent Pfizer data reveals DNA contamination and acknowledges that liquid nanoparticles can spread throughout the body, contradicting previous denials. Concerns are raised about potential links between mRNA vaccines and cancer, referencing a 2006 FDA document warning about long-term cancer risks associated with mRNA gene therapies. Despite the push for mRNA in flu vaccines, long-term safety studies are lacking. Evidence suggests that these therapies may indeed pose cancer risks. The speaker expresses confidence that within five years, the connection to cancer will become undeniable, citing existing documents and admissions that indicate serious risks, even if they are not openly acknowledged.

I'm Philippe Boucalt, a cancer genomics researcher at the University of South Carolina. I've sequenced the DNA in the Pfizer vaccine and found that it contains fragments of DNA. This DNA could potentially cause rare but serious side effects, such as cardiac arrest and future cancer risks. The regulatory process that allowed this contamination is concerning. The DNA could integrate into long-lived somatic cells and potentially cause autoimmune attacks or disrupt tumor suppressors. To produce the vaccine, they cloned the PCR product into a plasmid vector, which led to the contamination. We can easily measure the amount of this substance in the vaccine and should conduct further studies to understand its implications. The FDA should require Pfizer to remove the DNA from the vaccine.

The speaker discusses the presence of DNA in the Pfizer vaccine and expresses concern about its potential consequences. They explain that they sequenced the DNA in the vaccine and found it surprising that any DNA was present. The speaker suggests that this DNA could be causing rare but serious side effects, such as death from cardiac arrest. They also mention that the DNA could integrate into the genomic DNA of cells, potentially leading to genome modification and autoimmune attacks. There is a theoretical risk of future cancer as well. The speaker emphasizes the need to investigate these concerns further.

Pfizer's use of the RiboGreen technique to measure DNA in their vaccines has raised concerns about deceptive practices. The presence of billions of DNA fragments in each dose, some of which are small and more likely to integrate into the genome, is worrying. Preliminary data suggests a correlation between adverse events and contaminated Pfizer vaccines, but more research is needed. The DNA in the vaccines is different from previous contamination and carries a higher risk of integration. The FDA acknowledges the integration risk and the need for lower limits on DNA when copy numbers are high. The DNA is encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles, making it prothrombotic and potentially oncogenic. The presence of endotoxin and the spike protein in the vaccines further complicates the situation. The vaccines have been found in various tissues and can lead to prolonged expression of the spike protein. Insertional mutagenesis and cancer risk are concerns, especially for individuals with weakened immune systems. Regulatory bodies have confirmed the presence of the SV40 sequence in the vaccines, but the clinical implications are still unclear.

The speaker raises concerns about the contamination of current vaccines with DNA and the unknown consequences of this contamination. They argue that efforts should be made to eliminate DNA contamination, even if it increases production costs. The speaker mentions a researcher from MIT who accidentally discovered that mRNA vaccines were contaminated with DNA. They criticize Pfizer for testing vaccines from one process and then vaccinating billions of people with vaccines from another process, which were contaminated with DNA. The presence of DNA in the vaccines raises risks, including potential cancer development. The speaker believes it is misleading to claim that the vaccines have undergone clinical trials when they have not been properly studied. They call for more rigorous research before commercializing vaccines.

Speaker 0: They argue that because the vaccine is classified as such, they don’t have to worry about being sued. They claim immunity from liability is dependent on there being no fraud, and there clearly was fraud. Speaker 1: They say there is fraud. They note that immunity from liability depends on fraud, and in light of that, it matters. They explain that there was fraud. Speaker 0: Expresses surprise and asks for caveats about fraud. Acknowledges there were caveats. Speaker 1: Confirms there is fraud and says it makes the situation more interesting. Speaker 0: Asks how fraud is defined, noting that drugs were sold with multiple studies and only one was good. Speaker 1: Responds with a point about safety testing for the mRNA vaccines. States that the insufficient safety testing was done before release, and that the product injected into billions of people involved DNA plasmids. There is massive contamination in the shots actually delivered, including the SV40 promoter from simian virus 40. The point is that safety testing for one drug was completed, but people were injected with something different that had other components that were not tested, which is described as fraudulent. Speaker 0: Requests an explanation of the SV40 issue for the audience. Speaker 1: Describes production techniques used to generate the product. Explains that a plasmid, a circular piece of DNA, was used to produce the product in vats, with bacteria performing the production, later coated in lipid nanoparticle. There is a requirement to purify DNA and set standards for DNA contamination, with limits that cannot be exceeded. In this case, the problem isn’t only poor quality control but that there was a more painstaking way to produce the same product that did not involve DNA plasmids at all. Consequently, leftover material in vials injected into people contained DNA contamination across the board. Kevin McKernan tested vials, finding DNA contamination in the samples. Speaker 1: Explains that the DNA left over includes the SV40 promoter, a genetic trigger from simian virus 40, which is known to be carcinogenic. Since this promoter is left in the vials from injections given to people, it challenges the claim that the mRNA shots could not integrate into the genome. While acknowledging that there are cellular processes such as reverse transcription, the speaker asserts that even the claim of “no DNA” is false because there is DNA in the vials, specifically DNA with the SV40 promoter, a genetic engineering tool with carcinogenic potential. The speaker concludes that this appears to be fraud: injecting a different product into the public on the basis of safety testing that was conducted with a product produced by a different process. Speaker 0: Reiterates the conclusion: you can’t inject a different product into the public on the basis of safety testing that was done with something produced by a different process.

"Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA. It's not just mRNA." "This DNA is the DNA vector that was used as the template for the in vitro transcription reaction when they made the mRNA." "I sequenced it in my own lab." "The vials of Pfizer vaccine that were given out here in Colombia, one of my colleagues was in charge of that vaccination program in the College of Pharmacy." "And for reasons that I still don't understand, he kept every single vial." "So he had a whole freezer full of the empty vials." "And I checked these two batches, and I checked them by sequencing." "It's surprising that there's any DNA in there." "This DNA, in my view, it could be causing some of the rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest."

The Pfizer vaccine may contain DNA in addition to mRNA, according to a scientist who sequenced the vaccine in his lab. He obtained empty vials from a colleague and found DNA in them. This DNA could potentially cause serious side effects and integrate into the genomic DNA of cells, leading to long-term effects. The scientist is concerned about the regulatory process that allowed this to happen and warns of the risks of genome modification and autoimmune attacks. While the risk of cancer is believed to be rare, it is not zero. Further investigation is needed to determine the extent of these risks.

Moderna has a patent on the use of RNA for vaccines (patent number 2019-024-0317-A1). In that patent, Moderna explicitly acknowledges that RNA is superior to DNA for vaccine purposes because of “problems” including the possibility of insertional immunogenesis, which could lead to the activation of oncogenes or the integration of tumor suppressor genes. The transcript says that while the FDA says it is not aware of any concerns, Moderna’s own patent lays out the same concerns about DNA and insertional immunogenesis and genotoxicity, and that Moderna “knows it.” The discussion then turns to DNA as a contaminant. The transcript says DNA is left in because, in “process two,” circular DNA is purified from bacteria to make RNA; RNA makes protein; then the DNA is degraded and must be purified away from the RNA. It says the process is apparently not very good, and that DNA fragments were detected after some scientists in the U.S. and Canada obtained unopened vials with clear chain of custody, sampled them, and performed deep sequencing to reconstruct what circular plasmid DNA looked like in the RNA preparation. The transcript claims that these DNA fragments were not disclosed to the public. It adds that the reconstructed sequences include sequences “normally not allowed” in anything going into humans, including an antibiotic resistance gene for kanamycin or neomycin. It also says sequences from simian virus 40 (SV40) are present, specifically highly active promoter sequences. The transcript states that FDA older regulations said these must be avoided because they confer additional risk for insertional mutagenesis. The transcript further claims that when Pfizer provided documents to the FDA, EMA, and Health Canada, Pfizer took standard plasmid maps generated by publicly accessible programs and deleted the notation indicating SV40 sequences. It then says that the FDA did not reconstruct raw DNA sequences to check these maps and instead relied on Pfizer’s submissions. The transcript attributes the emergence of these findings to researchers performing work “akin to the lot release testing that is not happening.” When asked about downstream bad outcomes, the transcript says the outcomes associated with DNA damage include birth defects and cancer.

Alden and colleagues found that Pfizer's genetic code can be integrated into the human genome within an hour in a cancerous cell line. This suggests that Pfizer and Moderna's genetic material might become a permanent part of human DNA. There is no study confirming or denying this possibility. The concern is that if eggs or sperm incorporate this genetic code, it could be passed on to future generations. This lack of research is seen as reckless and worrisome.

The Pfizer vaccine contains not only mRNA but also plasma DNA from the vector used in its production. I sequenced samples from two batches of the vaccine in Colombia and found this DNA, which raises concerns about potential health risks. This DNA could integrate into the genomic DNA of cells, leading to permanent changes. Such integration poses theoretical risks, including autoimmune responses and cancer, depending on where the DNA inserts itself in the genome. While these risks may be rare, they warrant investigation to understand their implications better.

Kevin discovered that the vials used for vaccines are contaminated with bacterial DNA. This is concerning because the modified RNA used in these vaccines creates unusual genetic structures that don't occur naturally. Normally, DNA is in a double helix form, but with modified RNA, there are three strands attached to the DNA. The enzyme used to remove DNA, called DNase, cannot digest these triple-stranded genetic constructs, resulting in DNA contamination in the shots. Pfizer and Moderna should have addressed this issue during the manufacturing process by using different enzymes. This shows that assumptions cannot be made when working with new, unnatural products. The DNA used to manufacture the modified RNA was not properly removed, leading to multiple scary aspects of contamination.

The Pfizer vaccine may contain DNA in addition to mRNA, according to a researcher who sequenced the vaccine in their lab. The DNA is a vector used in the production of the mRNA. The researcher expressed concern about the potential consequences of this, including rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest. The DNA could integrate into the genomic DNA of cells and become a permanent part of them, posing a risk of genome modification and autoimmune attacks. There is also a theoretical risk of future cancer depending on where the foreign DNA lands in the genome. The researcher believes further investigation is needed to determine if these risks are occurring.

The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA, not just mRNA. This DNA is the DNA vector used as the template for the in vitro transcription reaction. This was discovered by sequencing vials of Pfizer vaccine from Colombia. It's surprising that there's any DNA in there. The speaker is alarmed about the possible consequences of this, including rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest. Mixing DNA with a lipid complex allows it to enter cells and become a permanent fixture. This is a real hazard for genome modification of long-lived somatic cells, like stem cells, and could cause a sustained autoimmune attack. There is also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer in some people. The risk is not zero and it may be high enough that we ought to figure out if this is happening or not.

The Pfizer vaccine contains DNA contamination in addition to mRNA. The DNA comes from the DNA vector used as a template for making the mRNA. Sequencing analysis of the vaccine revealed the presence of DNA, which could potentially cause serious side effects and integrate into the genomic DNA of cells. This poses risks such as autoimmune attacks and potential future cancer. The DNA contamination likely occurred during the production process. It is important to investigate if this DNA has integrated into the genomes of vaccinated individuals. The FDA should require Pfizer to remove the DNA from future versions of the vaccine. The regulatory limit for DNA in vaccines is outdated and not suitable for this type of vaccine. It is necessary to address this oversight and ensure the safety of the vaccine.

The speaker discusses the presence of DNA in the Pfizer vaccine and expresses concern about its potential consequences. They explain that they sequenced the DNA in the vaccine and found it surprising that any DNA was present. The speaker suggests that this DNA could be causing rare but serious side effects, such as death from cardiac arrest. They also mention that the DNA could integrate into the genomic DNA of cells, potentially leading to genome modification, autoimmune attacks, or even future cancer. The speaker acknowledges that these concerns are theoretical but believes they warrant further investigation.