reSee.it - Related Video Feed

There was no pandemic; data shows all-cause mortality did not rise before the WHO's declaration. The real public health emergency stemmed from government actions. Inappropriate PCR tests misled people into thinking they had a specific disease, while harmful medical procedures led to unnecessary deaths in hospitals and care homes. Many were denied life-saving antibiotics, resulting in bacterial pneumonia deaths. The claim of a pandemic justified rushed vaccine development, which is impossible within the stated timeframe. Manufacturing complex biological products typically takes years, and what was administered was likely a toxic substance. This narrative allowed for mass vaccinations, with millions reportedly dying as a result.

Major strategic problems in global communication have led to the spread of disinformation about the pandemic on social media. State-sponsored groups are creating accounts to sow political discord and gain financial advantages. Violence against healthcare workers and minority populations is increasing. Different countries are implementing limited internet shutdowns to manage the overwhelming amount of misinformation. Experts agree that identifying every bad actor is a huge challenge, and new disinformation campaigns are generated daily. Some believe that controlling access to information is necessary to combat the problem. However, it's not just trolls spreading fake news, but also political leaders. It's crucial to ensure that accurate public health information reaches the public through various outlets. Misinformation is causing unrest, eroding trust, and hindering response efforts. Governments are implementing interventions, including internet shutdowns and penalties for spreading harmful falsehoods. Social media companies are trying to limit misuse of their platforms, but it's a complex issue. The public is losing trust in both misinformation and the measures to control it.

There have been more cases and deaths reported in China. Misinformation is spreading, with some people believing the virus was man-made by a pharmaceutical company. It is important to train healthcare workers so they can provide accurate information and not spread false information. Access to reliable communication is crucial, and working with telecommunication companies can help ensure this. Trusted sources should be used to amplify the message and address disinformation. It is necessary to respond quickly to false information that hinders efforts to combat the pandemic.

Today's video is about a simulation called event two zero one, which simulated meetings of a group called the Pandemic Emergency Board. The simulation was sponsored by the World Economic Forum, Johns Hopkins School for Security, and funded by NIH and Gates. The video discusses the importance of communication and combating disinformation during a pandemic. It also mentions the need for governments to take unprecedented actions and the potential for a severe global pandemic. The simulation took place before the first reported case of coronavirus in Wuhan, China. It highlights the strain on healthcare systems, the need for a vaccine, and the shortage of medical supplies.

There have been more cases and deaths reported in China. Misinformation about the virus being man-made by a pharmaceutical company has caused violations and even deaths. It is important to train healthcare workers to ensure they have accurate information and can provide proper care. Telecommunication companies should be involved in providing access to communication for everyone. Trusted sources, including community leaders and health workers, should amplify the correct message. Constant communication is necessary to address misinformation and respond to concerns. There are foreign disinformation campaigns that need to be countered quickly to effectively combat the pandemic.

There is a discussion about the control of information and how false information can be challenged. Social media platforms are urged to take responsibility and partner with scientific and health communities to provide accurate information. The idea of government enforcement against fake news is also mentioned. Shutting down information is seen as impractical, and instead, flooding accurate information and relying on trusted sources are suggested strategies. The video then shifts to a description of a past pandemic, where millions of people died, the global economy suffered, and societal impacts were long-lasting.

In 1993, the World Economic Forum’s Global Leaders program, specifically the Young Global Leaders, began, with Bill Gates among the first into the camp. The speaker notes that about 4,000 individuals have progressed into senior positions since 1993, implying a broad pipeline of influence over time. The argument presented is that this setup helps explain why events around 2020 unfolded in a coordinated way. In 2005, the World Economic Forum hosted a large gathering of these Young Global Leaders for the so-called 2020 initiative. They brought them together and had them brainstorm what they would do, informing them of what they should do. The claim is that when 2020 arrived and a big pandemic emerged, these leaders were already positioned and had already discussed how to respond to misinformation and lockdowns, implying a premeditated or preplanned approach. The speaker characterizes this as “Pavlov’s dogs,” suggesting predictability and rehearsed responses. The speaker then references the Global Risk Report from 2006, produced by the Rand Corporation in collaboration with the military–industrial complex and the World Economic Forum. The report allegedly identified pandemics as the big risk for the world around 2020, even noting this risk “for zero reason whatsoever.” It is asserted that the report also identified misinformation as a major problem, predicting that ordinary people might start talking and spreading fear, which would hinder whatever outcomes were anticipated. The speaker asserts that those involved were aware that ordinary public discourse could decrease fear and undermine the “scam,” hence their stated need to stop the spread of fear by censoring information. This is presented as the rationale behind censorship measures described in the 2006 context. Key points emphasized: - The 1993–present pipeline of Young Global Leaders through the World Economic Forum, including Bill Gates, with roughly 4,000 reaching senior positions since 1993. - The 2005 2020 initiative to brainstorm and direct actions for 2020, implying foreknowledge of potential misinformation and pandemics. - The 2006 Rand Corporation Global Risk Report, in collaboration with the military–industrial complex and WEF, identifying pandemics as a major risk and misinformation as a key problem, and arguing for censorship to prevent public discussion from inflaming fear.

Social media companies are deleting accounts spreading disinformation about the pandemic, including state-sponsored groups. Violence against healthcare workers and minority populations is increasing. Some countries are implementing limited internet shutdowns to manage the overwhelming amount of misinformation. Experts believe that identifying every bad actor is a challenging task, as new disinformation campaigns are generated daily. Controlling and reducing access to information may be necessary to combat the problem. However, it's not just trolls spreading fake news, but also political leaders. It is crucial for news organizations, public health groups, and companies to promote accurate information to protect the public.

The National Security Agency believes that the coronavirus began circulating on September 12. A month later, Bill Gates hosted a pandemic simulation in New York City with April Haines, the CIA's deputy director, raising questions about the CIA's involvement in public health. During the simulation, discussions focused on managing a pandemic rather than public health strategies, with no emphasis on effective treatments or communication among global doctors. Notably, a doctor in Argentina had success using ivermectin, but this information was not shared. The simulation also included plans for social media companies to censor dissent regarding the virus's origins, fearing blame on public health officials and funding sources linked to gain-of-function research.

We're here to simulate meetings of the Pandemic Emergency Board amidst a severe pandemic requiring global cooperation. There are conspiracy theories about pharmaceutical companies or the UN releasing this for their own benefit. Perhaps it's time to bring forward bad actors and prosecute those spreading fake news. A new coronavirus is causing a respiratory illness, and demand for protective equipment is rising. Healthcare facilities are overwhelmed, and people are avoiding public spaces. Polls show 65% are eager for a vaccine, even if experimental, though I'm not optimistic about its timely arrival. Penalties, including arrest, are in place for spreading falsehoods. Controlling information access may be the right choice. We need to save lives, but we can't afford a response that suffocates the economy. Large-scale protests and riots have led to crackdowns and martial law in some countries. The public has lost trust in their administrations. The economic turmoil and societal impacts, including distrust of news and breakdown of social cohesion, could last for years.

Social media has provided unprecedented access to health information but has also accelerated the spread of misinformation. This has contributed to mistrust in vaccines and other health interventions, fueled stigma and discrimination, and led to violence against health workers and marginalized groups. During the COVID-19 pandemic, falsehoods about masks, vaccines, and lockdowns spread rapidly and were almost as deadly as the virus.

A highly infectious virus is most likely to kill over ten million people in the next few decades. If we get an airborne pandemic without preparation, millions could be adversely impacted. The next administration will face challenges like their predecessors, making pandemic prevention a top priority. When Trump faces his first major epidemic, he will likely project impulsivity, xenophobia, and a cavalier attitude towards facts to over 52,000,000 followers. It is almost inevitable that we will have another pandemic. Event two zero one simulates a severe pandemic involving a new coronavirus. A proposal is made to distribute a new vaccine to everyone in the world. It is plausible that a novel avian virus outbreak could occur in China, and vaccines could be printed on a patch for self-administration using the RNA sequence.

In 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation published a document predicting a pandemic leading to authoritarian control and surveillance. China's quick response was praised. The document also mentions Event 201, a simulation of a coronavirus outbreak in 2019. Misinformation was highlighted as a major issue during the pandemic. The World Health Organization warned of a highly lethal respiratory pathogen causing a global catastrophe. Bill Gates previously warned of a major pandemic causing millions of deaths. The current situation is seen as a result of long-term planning.

There will likely be a deadly airborne disease in the future, so we need to establish a global infrastructure to quickly detect, isolate, and respond to it. This was emphasized by multiple speakers. A document from 2010 predicted a pandemic similar to what we are experiencing now, with China being better prepared and implementing strict measures. The document also foresaw increased government control and oversight, which has become a reality. A simulation called Event 201, held in October 2019, accurately predicted the coronavirus outbreak. The speakers discussed the importance of managing misinformation and disinformation. They believe that controlling access to information is necessary to combat the pandemic. Some speakers expressed skepticism about the coincidences and the level of control being exerted.

Latin American countries alerted the WHO of outbreaks of a new infectious disease that could cause a severe pandemic if containment and mitigation efforts fail. Pandemics are political, financial, and global health risks. National leadership is crucial, along with support for local and national responses, training, and regional solidarity. Communication is key, involving scientists, social, religious, and political leaders. Trust is essential and needs to be rebuilt among countries, populations, and healthcare systems. The WHO should strengthen its role as a voice for the voiceless. Over a billion cases and 20 million deaths, including 15 million children, have been reported worldwide. Pandemic preparedness and response teams were established, but more countries should have participated. Lessons learned should be applied to future pandemics.

In 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation published a document predicting a pandemic like COVID-19. It described a scenario where governments imposed strict measures, citizens gave up privacy for safety, and misinformation spread. Event 201, a simulation hosted in 2019, eerily mirrored the pandemic. Experts warned of a highly infectious virus causing global catastrophe. The current situation is seen as a result of long-term planning.

In 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation published a document called "Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development." One scenario, called "lockstep," predicted a pandemic hitting in 2012. It described how even prepared nations were overwhelmed, economies suffered, and global supply chains broke. China, however, fared better due to its quick imposition of quarantine measures. The document also mentioned that other countries imposed strict rules and restrictions, leading to increased oversight and control. The video then discusses a pandemic simulation called Event 201, held in October 2019, which predicted the coronavirus outbreak. It raises questions about the coincidence and the ability to control information. The video suggests that everything was planned and in place before 2020.

This wasn't spontaneous; it was planned in plain sight, a war footing. A Marshall Plan-like approach could rapidly stimulate change. The science was bought, controlled via philanthrocapitalism to mandate vaccines globally. A worldwide lockstep approach amplified the alleged danger of a new virus through mainstream media, using horrific images. USAID manipulates news economics to enforce censorship. They own the science and expect platforms to comply. These actors can be prosecuted for fraud and racketeering. Withholding scientific data is fraud, but the mouthpieces spewed talking points like "nobody will be safe until everybody is safe". Departments rewrote rules, governors washed away rights, and politicians passed laws restricting freedoms. The vaccines aren't working, and should not be forced.

This event simulates a pandemic emergency board meeting where global businesses and governments collaborate to solve emerging problems. Conspiracy theories arise, blaming pharmaceutical companies or the UN for releasing the virus. Arrests and penalties are suggested for spreading falsehoods, even if it means controlling information access. Protests and riots erupt, causing public distrust in government and economic turmoil. Linguistic genomics identified coronavirus patents as early as 1999. The CDC patented the virus in 2003, controlling proprietary rights and profiting from it. Gain of Function Research on coronavirus was later offshored to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Some believe the virus was lab-designed, not a natural occurrence. Google's search engine and fact-checkers like Snopes and PolitiFact are accused of manipulating information. The WHO is criticized for inaccurate advice and being influenced by the Communist Party of China. Event 201, a pandemic simulation, occurred months before COVID-19. The Rockefeller Foundation's "Lockstep" scenario predicted authoritarian control. The "Great Reset" is seen as a coordinated agenda stripping away liberties. Bill Gates and his foundation are scrutinized for their influence on global health, vaccine initiatives, and investments in controversial technologies. Concerns are raised about vaccine safety, liability protection, and potential harm in developing countries. The COVID-19 vaccine is being developed and distributed rapidly, but there are concerns about safety testing and potential side effects. The pandemic is seen as a test of humanity's liberty. Medical freedom is emphasized. The need to reclaim humanity and avoid tyranny is highlighted.

There is misinformation circulating about the origin of the virus, with some people believing it is manmade. This misinformation can lead to violations and even deaths. It is important to train healthcare workers to ensure they have accurate information to share with the public. Telecommunication companies should be involved in providing access to reliable communication channels. Trusted sources should flood the zone with information, including community leaders and health workers, to amplify the message. Constant communication is necessary to address the vacuum created by disinformation. It is crucial to respond quickly to false information that hampers efforts to address the pandemic.

In 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation published a document called "Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development." One scenario, called Lockstep, predicted a pandemic hitting in 2012. It described how even prepared nations were overwhelmed, with the virus infecting 20% of the global population and killing 8 million in 7 months. China's quick response and strict measures saved lives and enabled a swifter recovery. The document also foresaw increased authoritarian control and oversight, with citizens willingly giving up privacy for safety. It mentioned biometric IDs and enforced cooperation with new regulations. The document highlighted a simulation called Event 201, held in October 2019, which predicted a coronavirus outbreak. It emphasized the need to manage misinformation and disinformation. The video suggests that these events were planned and executed with confidence.

The last major pandemic simulation occurred in October 2019, hosted by Bill Gates and others, focusing on pandemic management and freedom of speech. At that time, COVID-19 was not widely known, but it was likely circulating by mid-September. The Chinese government took down data from a lab linked to the virus around that time, indicating awareness of its spread. Shortly after the simulation, Gates sold 87% of his shares in BioNTech, which developed the Pfizer vaccine, making a significant profit. A week later, it was announced that the vaccine was ineffective. This sequence of events raises questions about the motivations and timing of actions taken by key figures during the pandemic.

In early February, experts at the foundation realized that the COVID-19 outbreak couldn't be contained due to extensive travel without diagnosis. The fatality rate was not well understood at that time, but it was known to mainly affect the elderly, similar to the flu. The world, including the United States, did not respond quickly enough to the threat, leading to a scary period of uncertainty.

The transcript discusses a narrative that connects Bill Gates, Jeffrey Epstein, and a global, pre-planned approach to pandemics, presenting a sequence of alleged events and structures designed to profit from health crises. It begins with a claim that new vaccines and health services could be improved and costs reduced by ten to fifteen percent over the next five to ten years, and that a future pandemic will occur regardless of current efforts. It is stated that the pandemic risk is two to three percent per year and that attention to preparedness will continue, noting that the pandemic was predictable and could be far more severe in the future. One speaker asserts they had predicted the risk of a pandemic and that it came true. The brand-new Epstein files are then introduced, claiming they show Epstein planned the whole thing from the start and expose a financial system designed around pandemics that operated long before COVID-19. The documents allegedly reveal a hidden network directly connecting Bill Gates, Jeffrey Epstein, and other powerful individuals. Epstein is said to have helped design the financial apparatus that later secured over 100 million dollars in funding for the Gates Foundation, advising JPMorgan executives on pitching a Gates Anchored Donor Fund to attract vaccine investments under the guise of philanthropy but designed to generate profits. It is claimed Gates had already invested in vaccines from the early 2000s but faced controversy over mass vaccine distribution and promises of disease eradication, which allegedly sometimes worsened problems. Gates is also quoted as saying vaccines could reduce the global population by a significant amount. There is a point-by-point timeline: the world’s population is described as 6.8 billion, headed toward about 9 billion, with a suggestion that great work on vaccines and reproductive health could lower that by ten to fifteen percent. In 2013, the Gates Foundation allegedly created the Global Health Investment Fund, allowing private investors to fund drug and vaccine development with a stated health purpose, while offering a 60% guarantee of principal, meaning investors would risk only 40% while the remaining 60% of potential losses would be covered by philanthropic and public money. This structure is said to convert global health issues into profitable opportunities with low risk, securing funds and enabling subsequent actions. Epstein’s role is described as expanding Gates’ influence in pandemic preparedness. The 2011 funding groundwork allegedly paved the way for broader governance, with Gates Foundation discussions in 2015 about pandemics and global responses, involving groups like the International Peace Institute, World Health Organization, World Bank, MSF, and UN officials. It is claimed Epstein acted as a back-channel intermediary to spread Gates’ influence, maintaining contacts even after funding refusals, by forwarding Gates’ articles on pandemic preparedness. The timeline continues with 2017 being a turning point, where pandemics were discussed as business opportunities rather than disasters, and Epstein was said to broker specialists into Gates’ office for pandemic simulations. A doctor’s text is cited indicating pandemic simulation as a key credential, with Epstein recommending a connection to Gates. That year also saw the World Bank launch the first emergency financing facility, raising $320 million in bonds named to cover coronavirus risks, implying planning for a coronavirus-style outbreak years in advance. In October 2019, six weeks before COVID-19, Event 201—a pandemic simulation modeled on a novel coronavirus—was co-hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, the World Economic Forum, and the Gates Foundation, focusing on government policy during a viral outbreak, distribution of drugs, media messaging, social media management, public compliance, and unified global response. Six weeks later, the real outbreak began. While the documents are not proof, and other evidence such as patents and gain-of-function funding are cited, the narrative suggests a pattern of pre-planned preparation, money, simulations, networks, vaccines, and elite alignment. The closing question asks readers to consider who benefits when such world-stage events occur, proposing that identifying beneficiaries clarifies the situation.

In 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation published a document called "Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development." One scenario, called Lockstep, predicted a pandemic hitting in 2012. It described how even prepared nations were overwhelmed, with the virus infecting 20% of the global population and killing 8 million in 7 months. China's quick response and strict measures saved lives and enabled a swifter recovery. The document also foresaw increased authoritarian control and oversight, with citizens willingly giving up privacy for safety. It mentioned biometric IDs and enforced cooperation with new regulations. The document highlighted a simulation called Event 201, which took place in October 2019 and predicted a coronavirus outbreak. It raised questions about the accuracy of these predictions and the control exerted by those in power.