reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker asserts that ADL, APAC, and UJA Federation are “literally arms of Mossad that operate with basically carte blanche.” They claim APAC is “the lobby that buys our congress,” ADL is “the legislative apparatus that tries to erode our civil liberties and our constitutionally protected rights to legislate protections for Jews and Jews alone,” and UJA Federation is “the fixer organization that funds and fixes and does basically all of the ops,” with “nine eleven” as a notable example. They reference early 2024, noting Kat Williams’ interview with Shannon Sharpe where Williams said “all lies will be exposed this year,” and anticipate developments around child trafficking and Hollywood controversies involving figures like P. Diddy, suggesting these issues would come to a head. They mention that when Trump announced, Lee Zeldin was described as being “funded by literally those same people, the AIG's, the Seth Clarman's, the Daniel Lobes, the fucking UJA Federations.” They name the third person as Elise Stefanik, claiming she is “literally founded by the same funded by the same people,” and that Stefanik is “on involved with National Endowment for Democracy,” which allegedly “melted half of West Hollywood with the fucking fires in collusion with Karen Bass and the former legislative director of APAC, Kenneth Wallach.” The fourth person named is Kristi Noem, described as having “passed antisemitism laws of within the borders of South Dakota.” The speaker then says, “we get Trump in office,” and mentions Kash Patel being nominated for FBI director. Patel is quoted as saying on some network that “we need to commit to protecting need Americans to wake up and prioritize truth,” and the speaker adds that “That is the last fucking thing that any of us want want to hear right.”

The transcript centers on allegations that Naftali Aaron Kranz is a paid protester and that a group called GetFree recruits and deploys paid demonstrators. A journalist questions whether there is someone they can speak to, and the conversation suggests the person of interest is on the other side of a park. The speaker asserts that Naftali Aaron Kranz is “a paid protester through and through,” and that he posts on LinkedIn to hire paid protesters for GetFree, a company advertising itself as a grassroots organization while paying people to protest. GetFree is described as hiring for part-time mobilization support contractors, seeking individuals with four-plus years of experience in leading direct action, large-scale mobilizations, demonstrations, and civil disobedience (which is described as experience getting arrested). Compensation is reportedly 3,500 to 4,200 dollars per month for an average of twenty hours per week. The speaker claims GetFree’s stated mission is to undo white supremacy, despite the assertion that Kranz and others are paid to protest. The narrative highlights Kranz’s participation in protests, including celebrating vandalism, with an example cited of “Crown Heights stay winning” after an egg was thrown at a stranger’s cyber truck and dog feces placed on it. The speaker places Kranz at an abolish-the-police rally, noting he is not leading the protest but blending in with recruits, enabling a later photo op. The claim is that this recruitment tactic blends various leftist causes to inflate the appearance of each individual cause. The speaker also states Kranz works with the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) and was encountered at a DSA Tax the Rich rally. LinkedIn activity is cited again, with Kranz posting about paid protester roles and recruiting nationwide in Chicago, the Bay Area, and Baltimore to expand turnout at events. When clicking a linked job posting, the contract is described as nine weeks, part-time, paying about 3,400 dollars in stipends issued biweekly, with responsibilities including recruiting and training people to drive turnout. The speaker identifies Nicole Cardi at the top of the Get Free movement and attributes a belief that George Floyd protests were a factor in Biden’s 2020 victory. The transcript connects protest NGOs to political goals, claiming donations to Get Free are funneled through ActBlue, which the Department of Justice is investigating for foreign contributions. It also asserts ActBlue funds activists like Indivisible Twin Cities, which allegedly orchestrates resistance to ICE agents in Minneapolis and has been paid protesters, receiving over 7.6 million dollars from Open Society Foundation, funded by George Soros. The speaker concludes with a personal note to stay away, and the journalist states they have to go.

Speaker 0 delivers a rapid-fire set of bragging lines about wealth, fashion, and success: “Go see my eyes red on my demons,” “My postie racks up just to motivate my niggas,” “Rappers need a stylist bad, but I ain't use a stylist yet,” “I signed a million dollar contracts in my box to steal a text,” “Wake up, check my bank account, phone numbers in there, bitch. I'm blessed,” and references to private jets, being fresh off the press, sipping drinks with lines, a tinted eye, a moving piece, and owning a new bulletproof Cadillac. He notes money, private flights, and the ability to charge for Instagram content, while cutting off a girl who didn’t pick up. The tone centers on opulent lifestyle, independence, and status. Speaker 1 shifts to a hostile, accusatory monologue: “All over the place, guys. Jack Kosoviak, Gabe Hoffman, Mike Cernovich, Laura Loomer.” He claims Gabe Hoffman “is running humps on people” and calls him a “bad guy.” He says he looks like he’s seen a ghost and that someone close to him was there to infiltrate him, describing these people as “really fucking bad” and stating they are “evil,” including claims of them being “unregistered foreign agents.” He asserts he will be watching everything they do and declares ongoing surveillance and vigilance: “I will be watching. Everything you do, I’m gonna be watching.” Speaker 2 notes a logistical detail: “Hell yeah. On my way back to the site to get my burner phone so I can use my ghost accounts…” indicating plans to obtain a burner phone for anonymous or modified online activity. Speaker 3 adds a blunt, explicit line about using “ghost accounts” for actions, saying, “can use my ghost accounts to fuck,” reinforcing the theme of covert or deceptive online activity. Overall, the transcript juxtaposes an ostentatious wealth/aspirational rap persona (Speaker 0) with a conspiratorial, accusatory stance toward specific public figures (Speaker 1), and mentions of circumventing scrutiny or anonymity online (Speaker 2 and Speaker 3). The named individuals identified by Speaker 1 are Jack Kosoviak, Gabe Hoffman, Mike Cernovich, and Laura Loomer.

The transcript strings together a series of fragmented remarks from multiple speakers, centered on conspiracy theories, political organizing, and media manipulation. Key points include: - Identity and information sources: Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 repeatedly ask, “Who the fuck is Jeremy?” and “Who the fuck is Jonathan?” about where they get information and why they deleted “karaoke,” signaling concern about sources and prior online activity. Speaker 3 later directs audiences to Jeremy Oliver on YouTube and Under “Onslaught Media Group” to see footage from protests, implying a push to present an alternative narrative to mainstream media. - Wisconsin as a pivot point: Speaker 2 describes Wisconsin as the place where “the evidence that I and my associate, Chris, had put together for Peter” was first presented under oath before the Wisconsin Senate Committee on Election Integrity. This is presented as a foundational moment in informing their views on elections. - Protests and media strategy: Several speakers reference attending or planning protests, streaming live coverage, and promoting First Amendment rights. There is urging to go to the capital today or on Friday, with claims of “the real story” beyond mainstream media. - Alleged coalition and political actors: The Flynn network, Ali Alexander, and Michael Flynn are named as central figures in a supposed strategy to create political instability and a “color revolution.” The discussion enumerates a supposed chain: the Flynn network’s ties to Patrick Byrne (founder of the America Project) and Roger Richards, who allegedly produced propaganda with Jordan Sather; Patrick Byrne’s connections to Stanley McChrystal; Flynn’s alleged legal or organizational registrations tied to McChrystal’s home; and involvement with the Defeat Disinfo Pack, an AI system for countering opposing viewpoints. - Information warfare and messaging: The speakers describe a broader plan involving “compliant independent media,” the spread of allegations of election fraud, and the mobilization of tens of thousands for protests. Brian Gamble (CIO of the America Project) is named as someone trained in information warfare and psychological operations; Emily Newman is described as having ties to the US Agency for Global Media, with ties to Hillary Clinton and John Kerry, framed as propaganda. - Election numbers and fraud claims: There is discussion of 2020 Maricopa County in-person voting figures (395,000 on election day, described as a lowball estimate due to COVID), with speculation about how many Republicans intended to vote but did not, and varying projections about missed voters (600k–700k mentioned, with some estimates around 150k). The comparison to midterms is used to argue about turnout patterns and perceived discrepancies. - Corporate and elite affiliations: References are made to the Rockefellers in connection with Scott Pressler, suggesting a linkage to supposedly nefarious finance and influence. There is a claim that Rockefeller money went directly to Scott, raising suspicions about funding sources and influence. - Personal safety and conduct: A speaker narrator describes intimidating behavior and the idea of exposing anonymous online actors through burner accounts to unmask traders and create real-world consequences, highlighting a motivation to disrupt online anonymity and safety. - Personal disclosures and reactions: Several speakers shift abruptly into frictional or confrontational exchanges (e.g., someone leaving a conversation, questions about conversations with Mike Lindell), illustrating tense, emotionally charged exchanges during the interactions. Overall, the transcript weaves together themes of alternative information channels, a claimed historical pivot in Wisconsin, a supposed Flynn-run strategy to destabilize the political system, allegations of media and government ties to propaganda or information warfare, and contentious discussions about election integrity, organizers, and elite affiliations.

The transcript follows a chaotic exchange among multiple speakers discussing information sources, political narratives, and protests, with several recurring themes and claims. - There is a pattern of questioning information sources and personal actions. Speakers repeatedly ask, “Who the fuck is Jeremy? Where do I get my information? Why did I delete karaoke?” and “Who the fuck is Jonathan? Where does he get his information? Why did he delete karaoke?” indicating a concern with source credibility and content deletion. - A speaker (Speaker 2) describes a sense of purpose from sharing information, claiming that Wisconsin was the first state where “the evidence that I and my one of my associates, Chris, had put together for Peter, Wisconsin was the first state where it was actually presented, you know, under oath in, you know, a senate… Wisconsin Senate Committee on Election Integrity.” -Jeremy Oliver (Speaker 3) promotes alternative information channels, stating he has a YouTube page, a personal Facebook page, and that viewers can see “at the last protesting.” He frames mainstream media as unreliable, promising to “stream live and show exactly what's going on at the protest and really just support the people that are out there fighting for our First Amendment rights.” - Several participants discuss plans to act on protest grounds, including references to “Using other state capitals for practice dry runs” (Speaker 4) and “we’re basically ready to storm the capital with us in a couple of minutes” (Speaker 5). - There are assertions that “we’re all actors, but I wanna direct and act” (Speaker 6) and depictions of confrontations with others during protest or media interactions, including exchanges where people demand to speak with others about Mary Fenix/Fanning (Speaker 5). - A series of critical assertions target then-President Donald Trump and link various individuals and organizations to a network. A speaker states: “Donald Trump has no business being president,” followed by further claims about a coalition “super think tank of Biden, Harris, a couple intellectual figure behind them… Mike Flynn… and two economists,” including Simon Johnson, described as IMF chief economist, with English birth. - The conversation introduces the America Project and Patrick Byrne, claiming Flynn registered Flynn Intel Group from Stanley McChrystal’s home and associating McChrystal with the Defeat Disinfo Pack, an AI system that detects opposing viewpoints for Trump, and then shares those viewpoints to counter them. The system is said to target the Patriot movement. - There is a claim that the Flynn network included Ali Alexander and Michael Flynn, and that their aim was “to create instability as they're trying to carry out a color revolution,” listing criteria such as “a united and organized opposition,” “an ability quickly to drive home the point that voting results are falsified,” “compliant independent media,” and “capable of mobilizing tens of thousands or more demonstrators.” - A discussion on 2020 voting numbers is presented as a comparison to the midterms. It is stated that “2020, they reported 395,000 in-person voters on election day,” with debate about whether that figure was statewide or in Maricopa County. Projections speculate on how many Republicans intended to vote but did not cast ballots, with estimates ranging from around 150,000 to 700,000. - Additional claims connect groups and individuals to broader political finance and media ecosystems, including mentions of the US Agency for Global Media, prior Hillary Clinton and John Kerry involvement, and references to propaganda concerns. - Toward the end, the discussion touches upon Wisconsin politics again, with commentary on a state supreme court candidate and voter ID emphasis as a Democrat-leaning position contrary to expectations, followed by a shift into a more personal debate about a case involving a mother’s tragedy and media attention, ending with a tangential accusation of sympathy manipulation.

"Every aspect of our lives. They've taken over our schools, churches, politics, media, music industry, bank, financial industry." "Planned Parenthood is selling viable, healthy, aborted babies to the University of California." "I'm just trying to schedule some gender affirming care. And the Planned Parenthood workers said, are you over 18? No. I'm 16." "Tissue is donated from aborted fetuses through Planned Parenthood and other facilities." "Planned Parenthood is now under federal investigation by the Department of Justice for selling fetal body parts." "Hollywood is run by Jews. It's owned by Jews." "They run all the politicians and run all the propaganda." "Mossad is going to its own Twitter account and making extortion, passive aggressive threats to American college students saying if you are attending these protests and you are insufficiently pro as you." "Please know we are using facial recognition to help you." "We will identify you."

Jeremy and Jonathan were questioned about where they get information and why karaoke was deleted. A speaker said Wisconsin was the first state where evidence put together by the speaker and associate Chris was presented under oath in the Wisconsin Senate committee on election integrity. A speaker directed people to find Jeremy Oliver on YouTube and on Facebook, and to check “slot media group” for coverage of the “last protest.” Others mentioned using other state capitals for practice “dry runs.” One person said, “We’re all actors, but I want to direct and act.” A journalist/narrator claimed not to get the “real story” from mainstream media and said they would stream live at the protest and support people “fighting for our first men in rights.” During a confrontation, Patrick was asked about Mary Fanning; the other party refused to speak. Another exchange included claims of a conversation with Mike Lindell, with “Don’t trust this guy” and “Let go of the microphone.” A speaker recited lines about “evidence,” “murder weapon,” “confession,” and “fingerprints,” and stated “Donald Trump has no business being President of the USA.” Another person repeatedly said the same. A speaker discussed a “coalition super think tank” associated with Biden and Harris, mentioning Mike Flynn, and stating Simon Johnson (described as chief economist of the IMF) was involved. Brian Gamble was described as CIO of the America Project, founded by Patrick Byrne, who was said to sit on the Council of Foreign Relations with Stanley McChrystal. The transcript alleged Flynn registered Flynn Intel Group from McChrystal’s home and that McChrystal advises an AI system “Defeat DisinfoPack” that detects communications from President Trump trending on social media and generates effective opposing viewpoints, which the speaker claimed is similar to targeting the Patriot movement. Another speaker said the Flynn Network was present, with Ali Alexander as a lead organizer, and Michael Flynn giving an address. The transcript described a strategy focused on creating instability, an organized opposition, convincing messaging that voting results were falsified, compliant independent media to inform citizens about falsified vote, and the ability to mobilize tens of thousands to protest alleged electoral fraud. A later discussion focused on 2020 and Maricopa County and contrasted it with midterm results. One participant said they reported 395,000 in-person voters on Election Day in Maricopa alone, described it as a lowball figure due to the COVID pandemic, and discussed speculation about how many Republicans intended to vote but did not cast ballots, estimating “every bit of 700,000” for Maricopa. Another participant said about 150,000 was probably missed. They discussed high “drop-offs,” and said the drop-offs “ended up bending more towards Democrats than we thought they would.” The America Project was further described alongside Patrick Byrne, Roger Richards, Jordan Sather, Emily Newman, and connections to the U.S. Agency for Global Media, with claims about psychological operations training and information warfare. A participant asked whether this was “PSYOP.” A speaker claimed to be tied to a group called the “Army of Northern Virginia,” described as military intelligence specialists of “over 800 people.” Another speaker argued for creating burner accounts, unmasking traitors, forcing real-world consequences, and interrupting people connected to anonymous online activity, describing personal safety concerns about doxxing and security clearances. The transcript also included comments about “Rockefellers” and “Scott Pressler,” with one person saying he was directly given money by the Rockefellers and asking how he got into a room with the Rockefeller family. Charlie Kirk was quoted as believing the way to beat the system is to do the same things “that built the system more, but more,” and that there was “no desire to reform the system,” only to control the system and people through it. Finally, one person mentioned checking what happened in Wisconsin, saying Democrats elected a Supreme Court justice, while the state passed voter ID by a wide margin, and said it “doesn’t make any sense.” Another person said they had no knowledge of it personally, then claimed they spoke to a woman “at great length” who “scared the crap out of me,” that a kid was “clearly killed by somebody,” and that after reading a report they contacted Ro Khanna from California, but “nothing ever happened.”

During a heated Spaces discussion, Speaker 0 repeats “the receipts are down in the nest” while debating “the New Zealand Women in Leadership Publication” (WIL Publication) and who funds whom. The group questions “who does she work for?” and references a pinned post about unconscious bias, debating connections to Helen Clark and the “former prime minister of New Zealand.” They claim “VY Capital” runs by “New England defense forces” funds Elon Musk, with “CEO John Herring” as a major funder, “funded by the same Russian Jewish oligarchs that Putin had to deal with” sowing division among NATO and Five Eyes. Speaker 0 asserts “Tommy Robinson is a Jewish Mossad operative” and labels the protest “incitement” at Tommy Robinson’s British far right protest. They discuss Hamas being “created by Israel” and “Hamas registration documents.” The exchange touches on doxxing, race, civility, with interruptions and rebuttals.

On October 18th, a pro-Hamas group led by Rashida Tlaib illegally occupied the Canon House building. Photos captured organizers texting each other in a chat called "global intifada." During a Homeland Committee hearing, the FBI director, Christopher Lee, admitted he was unaware of the group and its meaning. Over 300 members were arrested, including one with terrorist ties who almost assaulted a congresswoman. The chat also revealed the involvement of Katrina Blakely, a lead attorney at the Southern Poverty Law Center, which the FBI has used as a resource. The congresswoman criticized the FBI for not caring about terrorism and accused them of being a political campaign arm. She also mentioned Tlaib's connection to a Facebook group with known terrorists.

Speaker 0: Describes being “free as a bird,” moving “in the air,” and feeling “heavy,” with lyrics about diamonds and tattoos covering his scars. Mentions “Cut that bitch off,” not picking up when he calls, and hitting “another city” without needing to look around for others, saying he brought “the vibes” and “fresh off the press of cool.” References drinking, tinted eyes, and “Sprite” and “post some lines in it.” Claims the “shit here gonna sell itself,” with “weighted” motion and “one of my hoes shop in Chanel,” plus others “can’t stay off chain.” Repeats themes of “motion involved,” being “heavy,” “Diamonds and tattoos cover my scars,” “bulletproof” and “300 love,” and says “Make a killing,” “Got too many.” Speaker 1: Says “All over the place, guys,” and names Jack Kosoviak, Gabe Hoffman, Mike Cernovich, and Laura Loomer. Says Gabe Hoffman is “running humps on people” and calls him “a bad guy.” Says “I look like I’ve seen a ghost,” and claims someone very close to them was there “to infiltrate me.” Says “These are really fucking bad people,” “I’m beyond pissed,” and “It’s bad.” Claims “They tried to set someone up that you know and love.” Repeats “They’re fucking evil. These people are evil.” Says they are “unregistered foreign agents,” and claims “We’ll be watching,” saying “I will be watching,” including “everything they … everything you do.” Speaker 3: Responds “Hell yeah,” saying they are on their way back to the site to get a “burner phone” to use “ghost accounts” to “fuck Breva.” Speaker 5: States “We conduct riots and color revolutions,” “steal elections,” and “overthrow governments we don’t like,” and says “I was part of that.” Speaker 4: Says “IIA, which is social media psychological warfare,” and claims “We began that really in 2007.” Speaker 6: Says “They’re all being punished because they thought that what those important people told them was gonna happen.” Claims “I was there,” says people were “pumped that they were gonna fucking trash the capital,” and says, “And I was like, no. This is not good.” Speaker 7: Says the people “weren’t very prepared.” Speaker 0 replies that they’re not “come in to rush the building,” but asks whether “just having a little bit of security knowledge” meant they weren’t prepared. Speaker 1 says what “pisses me off” is that people say “I’m being handled.” Speaker 3 says “I’ve heard that before.” Speaker 7 warns it’s “very dangerous that people are out there giving people hope.” Speaker 4 concludes: “There is a storm coming like nothing you have ever seen, and not a one of you is prepared for it.”

The speaker says they “followed the money” to what they call the “protest industrial complex,” “Riot Inc.,” and identified a network of NGOs funding the ecosystem. They state the funding extends beyond the Soros/Open Society network to other funding networks, including the Arabella Funding Network, the Tides Funding Network, Neville Roy Singham and his network, and “Foreign Cash,” along with “big, left wing” funders, including non-citizens. The speaker names Mr. Hans Georg Wiese of Switzerland as an example of such funders. The speaker presents three “money facts” about Riot Inc. First, they describe Riot Inc. as having divisions similar to a corporation: not only an “Antifa boots on the ground” division, but also PR divisions, marketing divisions, and a “very well funded legal division” to “get these boots on the ground back on the streets as quickly as possible,” alongside the investors previously mentioned. Second, they claim they identified “dozens of radical organizations” that received more than $100,000,000 from Riot Inc. investors, including “lawyer groups” that advocate for calling “good honest Americans fascists.” Third, they claim that more than $100,000,000 in U.S. taxpayer funding flowed into these funding networks, including at least $4,000,000 to “these very groups themselves.” They cite an Atlanta event called “Stop Cop City,” saying more than 60 rioters were charged with domestic terrorism and that these groups received money from both “the billionaire class” and “taxpayer money” for that. The speaker also claims that this money helps fund decentralized crowdfunding platforms used by groups such as “Antifa,” the “John Brown Gun Club of Elm Fork” (linked by the speaker to an attack on an ice facility), and the “Socialist Rifle Association.” They add that groups without LLCs or EIN numbers can still be paid through these crowdfunding platforms. The speaker closes by saying they will keep “following the money” and thanks the audience for leadership.

The transcript describes a network of “brightest minds” across media, tech, and politics who, it says, “play dumb” about racing and engage in “covering up each other's dirty tricks.” It suggests that influential figures are linked through relationships and coordinated conduct, framing the scene as interconnected rather than separate. It names “Elon” and then references “Sam and Mac and Chew,” implying that these individuals are part of the same ecosystem. The transcript also explicitly points to “Rotary Gates and Brad Smith too,” connecting those names to a broader theme of manipulation. It states that “rigging elections is nothing new,” and characterizes election outcomes as determined by “key swing states,” described as only “a few,” while claiming that “the future of civilization” is at stake. It then lists a series of mechanisms and alleged participants, including “illegal lottery, bribes and mistakes.” The transcript includes the phrase “Super Brad Schemmel was a super bad joke,” then continues with additional names and organizations: “Antonio Gracias and Aspen Institute.” It also references “Pritzker and Epstein,” followed by “Kimball Square Roots,” “Gable Man,” “Freemason and Rotary too,” and then “Flynn and Rakeland and the MyPillow crew controlling all sides.” Further, the transcript asserts that these groups and figures work together: “That's what they do.” It mentions “Titletown Tech and Microsoft build,” “Foxconn in China buy,” and “Kirk is shot, Orest's throat explodes,” presenting these as part of the same overarching pattern described earlier. The transcript continues with a broad set of names and media figures: “Alex Jones, Rogan and Elon enjoy your smoke.” It also includes “George Webb, Ian Carroll and the Cleanup Bros.” It claims that “no one asks about the super secret CNP no more,” framing this as a change in public attention or inquiry. Finally, the transcript concludes with: “Every branch,” reinforcing the idea that multiple sectors or divisions are involved within the same system.

There is going to be a need for thousands of people and millions to come into the streets. "The ultimate vision is to break with their comfort and come into the streets day after day, night after night, in the hundreds of thousands until the millions." "Last week, we released video of New York Antifa like group Refuse Fa, short for Refuse Fascism, training people how to poke people's eyes out and reframing assault as self defense." "It's not just Soros and Steyer who may have interest in groups like Refuse Fa and Antifa. It's also our friends in Silicon Valley." "Our cities are on fire." "If there was 10 to 50,000 demonstrating in those five cities, there'd be a million people." "The Electronic Frontier Foundation is the main organization that fights for Internet privacy, net neutrality."

The transcript intercuts a lyrical unreality with a sprawling, confessional denunciation of others and alleged political manipulation. - In a music-like segment, Speaker 0 raps about luxury, danger, and motion: “A thud right now. In the air. I'm free as a bird. Plus, I'm flat right now. Drip talking slur.” He describes being heavily adorned with diamonds and tattoos, a bulletproof Cadillac, and a life of constant movement, with lines like “Diamonds and tattoos cover my scars,” “One of my hoes shop in Chanel,” and “This shit here gonna sell itself.” He references multiple cities, vibes, drinks, and fashion, claiming “a whole lot of motion involved” and that his presence will “sell itself.” He mentions being in possession of “too many” cars and a lifestyle marked by luxury and risk. - Speaker 1 names public figures—“Jack Kosoviak, Gabe Hoffman, Mike Cernovich, Laura Loomer”—and accuses Gabe Hoffman of “running humps on people” and being “a bad guy, dude.” They express intense anger and fear, saying, “I look like I’ve seen a ghost,” and claim that someone very close to Speaker 1 was likely sent to infiltrate them. They insist, “These are really fucking bad people,” and state, “They tried to set someone up that you know and love.” - The repeated assertion appears: “They’re fucking evil. These people are evil.” The speakers claim these individuals are “unregistered foreign agents” and announce plans to “be watching everything they everything you do.” The commitment to surveillance is explicit: “I will be watching. Everything they everything you do.” - Speaker 3 talks about returning to a site to get a burner phone to use “my ghost accounts to fuck Breva,” indicating plans to operate anonymously online. - Speaker 5 references participation in broader political actions: “We conduct riots and color revolutions and, you know, steal elections, and we overthrow governments we don’t like. And I was part of that.” - Speaker 4 cites the IIA, describing it as “social media psychological warfare” that began in 2007. - Speaker 6 recalls being present at events around the attempted assault on the Capitol, saying, “They were all pumped that they were gonna fucking trash the capital. I was there,” followed by a realization that “This is not good.” - Speaker 7 notes a lack of preparation among those involved and alludes to a looming, unprecedented storm: “There is a storm coming like nothing you have ever seen, and not a one of you is prepared for it.” Overall, the transcript juxtaposes opulent self-presentation with allegations of corruption, infiltration, and active participation in political manipulation and destabilization, punctuated by threats of surveillance, retaliation, and an impending large-scale upheaval.

And some of my my duties included looking for any type of threats for First Amendment demonstrations or assemblies that were occurring in Washington, D. C, and also monitoring those First Amendment demonstrations for any type of criminal or terrorist activity conducted under the guise of the lawful First Amendment demonstrations. Enrique Tarrio was slated to speak at it, and some of the Proud Boys were going be there as kind of unofficial security for the event. One of my duties, as I mentioned, was to investigate any type of threats. We spoke with the organizer of that event, and she indicated to me that the Proud Boys and Enrique Tarrio had received social media threats. Groups were talking about throwing myriatic acid filled balloons at them. I was put in touch with Enrique Tarrio, and he provided me the social media posts that, where the threats were made.

"We've been able to, like, have, injunctions that, like, stop, you know, deportation flights and other types of things." "Qian Bahad admitted their caucus has secured injunctions that literally halt deportation flights while also stating that people need to pressure their local governments to not cooperate with the feds." "Last month, their undercover cameras caught Santiago Mouquet, a director at the Vera Institute, admitting the group tracks ICE movements and pushes that information out so illegal immigrants can dodge enforcement." "He also bragged about major donors, Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, and others." "The Vera Institute isn’t just help illegal immigrants evade ICE. They funnel money into radical causes like Black Lives Matter." "A widespread coordinated effort is currently happening right now to undermine federal law enforcement, slow down the deportation efforts."

The transcript presents a highly inflammatory, pro-immigration-enforcement narrative centered on recent unrest in Portland and Chicago, with broad claims about law enforcement, media, and politics. - In Portland, Kristi Noem, the secretary of homeland security, is described as visiting “Rip City,” inspecting what is framed as Antifa’s “mini confederacy,” and interacting with an undocumented migrant in a way likened to a dramatic arrest, with wording implying removal from the country. - The situation at protests is depicted as chaotic and violent, with ICE vans “busting through barricades” and targeting a fentanyl trafficker, a murder suspect, sex predators, and pedophiles “all iced in Oregon.” Protesters are accused of throwing rocks and using lasers and dye, while Democrats are described as saying it’s all “smoke and mirrors.” - Protesters are described as peaceful on the surface but with videographers behind them to create a perception of chaos; a tone is set that the media is biased, and there is contempt for mainstream outlets, including a claim that “Legacy Media doesn’t have any reporters filming the riots.” - Chief Bob Day is introduced as a police chief who is also a DEI consultant, previously working for a DEI nonprofit, and accused of coaching Antifa to avoid arrest. The narrative suggests that Day prioritizes positive media coverage and that his actions reflect a broader strategy to reimagine policing. - The piece asserts a strained relationship between people of color, police, and a broader social order, with speakers claiming that bias and racism within policing have not been adequately addressed and that challenges will increase unless something changes. - There are repeated claims that Antifa is attacking immigration officers for an extended period, while Portland is described as aiding Antifa and resisting ICE. A meeting between Kristi Noem and Bob Day is described as unfavorable to law enforcement, with Day allegedly dissatisfied by the outcome. - Chicago is portrayed similarly: federal agents’ operations are described as being hampered by a stand-down order, with a female rioter who allegedly doxxed ICE agents and rammed a car later described as extremely dangerous; prosecutors reportedly characterize the individual as dangerous, while the left is accused of prioritizing “micro confederacies” to protect alleged criminals. - The transcript ties these events to political figures and themes: mentioning Mayor Johnson and “no ICE zones,” referencing violent crime, and portraying actions by Democrats and certain judges as lenient toward criminals. A Latin King calls for a $10,000 hit on a border patrol commander. - There is a recurring narrative about the 2024-2025 political climate: immigration, crime, media bias, and political power. Claims include that illegal crossings have declined to the lowest level since 1970, that the FBI has arrested thousands in crime sweeps, and that political operatives hope to deploy troops to polling places to “protect the vote.” - The piece ends with criticisms of Kristi Noem and others, accusing them of sensationalism and of inciting actions, and portraying discussions about immigration and policing as deeply adversarial, with calls for stronger enforcement and political maneuvering to influence elections.

The dialogue centers on accusations and revelations about political operatives and influence campaigns. Key points include: - A list of individuals named as problematic figures: Jack Kosobiak, Gabe Hoffman, Mike Cernovich, and Laura Loomer. Gabe Hoffman is described as “running hops on people” and as “a bad guy,” with a claim that these people are “evil” and unregistered foreign agents that the speaker will be watching closely. - A claim of infiltration and surveillance: one speaker asserts that someone close to them was likely there to infiltrate, and that “these people” attempted to set up someone they know and love, with the speaker vowing to monitor everything they do. - Allegations of role in broader disruptive actions: one speaker says, “We conduct riots and color revolutions and, you know, steal elections, and we overthrow governments we don't like. And I was part of that.” - The origin of operational concepts: one speaker mentions IIA, describing it as social media psychological warfare that began in 2007. - A sense of punitive consequence and manipulation: another speaker states that “they’re all being punished because they thought that what those important people told them was gonna happen,” and recalls being present during a plan to trash the capital, noting a lack of preparedness and security knowledge. - Reactions to claims about being controlled: one speaker says it pisses them off that others claim they’re being handled, with another agreeing that such claims have been heard before. - A warning tone about danger and preparation: one speaker warns that it is “very dangerous” that people are out there giving others hope, describing “a storm coming like nothing you have ever seen,” and asserting that not a single person is prepared for it. - Personal and on-site context: there are mentions of returning to a site to get a burner phone and use ghost accounts, and of attempting to coordinate around Breva, indicating ongoing, weaponized online activity and counter-movement tactics. Overall, the speakers blend accusations of manipulation and clandestine influence with admissions of involvement in disruptive actions, interspersed with warnings of impending upheaval and calls for vigilance.

The transcript centers on a long-form discussion of the Epstein case, the alleged “deep state,” FOIA operations, and political maneuvering around Trump, with frequent calls to aggressively release and pursue Epstein-related documents and other investigations. The speakers assert that the FOIA department is being used to shield deep-state ties and that many federal offices are filled with anti-Trump figures who have prevented full disclosure. - Epstein files and the role of the deep state - The speakers claim the Epstein files are being selectively redacted by FOIA departments to conceal deep-state connections. They state that FOIA personnel are controlled by deep-state actors and that Epstein’s case involves a “fleet of aircraft” and operations linked to major power centers. They argue Epstein’s activities connect to money laundering, information laundering, and a broader set of deep-state assets and operations. - They propose a remedy: appoint Tom Fitton as special counsel on the Epstein files, arguing he “knows how FOIA really works,” understands key personnel, and has litigated Epstein-related cases for years. They assert this would restore public confidence and expedite the exposure of Democratic ties and other actors alleged to be involved. - They advocate for Trump to have executive-privilege-style powers to declassify and release Epstein materials, suggesting a broad interpretation of “Epstein file law” that would allow him to disclose or appoint an ombudsman with power to release materials at will. They emphasize the need to disclose Democratic ties and to hold press conferences when releasing documents, avoiding the use of fake documents or videos. - Specific figures and institutions named - Kash Patel is cited as saying there are “open files on a dozen plus coconspirators” and as someone who has noted alleged misdirections by those handling Epstein-related material. - Kyle Serafin and Phil Kennedy are mentioned as documenting a person at the FBI capacity who is “an anti-Trump advocate,” implying that deep-state appointments control FOIA and related processes. - Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss replacing FOIA and related personnel who are deeply implicated; they specifically name Tom Fitton as the ideal choice and entertain other high-profile figures like Tulsi Gabbard as potential custodians of the Epstein disclosures. - Tulsi Gabbard is described as being in charge of broader investigations tied to the Epstein files and other major political issues (elections, COVID-19, etc.). They also reference “Epstein files” intersecting with other investigations they attribute to the deep state. - Epstein, Maxwell, and allied networks - Epstein is described as deeply embedded with Western intelligence agencies (French, Israeli, UK, and US) and tied to Robert Maxwell, with Maxwell’s daughter linked to Epstein. Epstein is portrayed as having been “recruited by Bill Barr” and as a central figure in a long-running intelligence and blackmail operation. - The discussion links Epstein to Leslie Wexner (Victoria’s Secret founder) and a French talent agency, portraying these connections as part of a large, interconnected network involved in money laundering, arms trafficking, blackmail, and intelligence work. - The speakers insist that Epstein’s activities extended to the late 1990s and beyond, including alleged involvement in “Shutters” in Santa Monica and other high-profile cases, with a consistent pattern of using underage girls and blackmail to exert influence. - They emphasize a broader motive: exposing the “deep state” to vindicate Trump and indict deep-state actors who allegedly engaged in illicit operations, including foreign intelligence services and Western governments. - The broader political frame and potential indictments - The Epstein files are presented as a potential hinge for indicting a wide array of figures across political lines, including references to Comey, Mueller, Hillary Clinton-era actors, and other “rogue actors” who allegedly hindered investigations. - The conversation ties Epstein to broader themes: the 2020 election, COVID policies, and anti-Trump actions by the “deep state.” They contend that the Epstein disclosures could demonstrate the depth of state interference in political processes and media, making Democrats and their institutions targets of accountability. - They argue the Epstien files could show criminal activity by multiple national actors, including Israeli, UK, and French components, and could reveal coordinated efforts to derail Trump and manipulate media narratives. - The Candace Owens angle and related criticisms - A substantial portion of the dialogue critiques Candace Owens, alleging she is running a “CIA-style” operation that distracts from the true conspiracy around the deep state and Tarantifa, and that she manipulates narratives related to Tyler Robinson and Charlie Kirk. - They accuse Owens of shifting narratives, fabricating alibis, and promoting disinformation, calling her a “SIOP” (psychological operation) and alleging her behind-the-scenes connections to MI6 or other international actors through her husband (George Farmer) and other associates. - They recount multiple incidents where Owens purportedly changed stories about meetings, alibis, and involvement in various investigations, asserting she uses “receipts” selectively and inconsistently to support divergent claims. - The speakers allege that Owens’s public warfare against Trump and TP USA is part of a broader intelligence operation intended to disrupt conservative momentum, link to Royal/MI6 circles, and undermine investigations into the deep state and its networks. - Tyler Robinson case and media dynamics - They describe Tyler Robinson as a Middle American figure whose transformation into a political actor is portrayed as a product of online radicalization and Tarantifa-linked influences. They claim there was a concerted effort to spoon-feed disinformation about Robinson and Candace Owens’ involvement. - They argue this is part of a larger pattern of media manipulation and disinformation designed to distract from real conspiracies and to target Trump and conservative movements. - Strategy and messaging guidance - The speakers advocate for Trump to go on the offensive with Epstein, releasing comprehensive, verified documentation, and pushing accountability for “rogue actors” in the FBI, the DOJ, the CIA, and the NSA. - They stress the need for aggressive prosecution and the appointment of trusted figures to lead the Epstein disclosures, arguing that this could restore public confidence and pivot the political conversation toward accountability for the deep state. - They urge addressing the statute of limitations issues in COVID, January 6, and 2020 election-related cases before the window closes in early 2026, warning that delays by Bondi, Blanche, and others could jeopardize prosecutions and political support. - Promotional and logistical notes - The dialogue includes frequent mentions of promoting Alex Jones programs, products, and stores (alexjonesstore.com and infowarsstore.com) to fund operations, along with appeals to listeners to support the broadcasts financially and through purchases, framing financial support as essential to sustaining investigations, media efforts, and broader political action. In sum, the transcript presents an entangled, aggressively conspiratorial narrative: a claim that Epstein’s files illuminate a vast, deeply embedded deep-state apparatus spanning multiple nations and agencies; a call to appoint trusted figures (notably Tom Fitton) to supervise full disclosure; a push for Trump to declassify and publicly prosecute the implicated actors; a harsh critique of Candace Owens as part of a disinformation ecosystem; and a broader strategy to use Epstein, along with related investigations, to dismantle perceived institutional corruption while fueling political narratives and fundraising.

The transcript claims the organizers “followed the money” to what they call “Riot Inc.” and its “protest industrial complex,” stating it involves a network of NGOs funded by multiple sources, including the Soros/Open Society network, the Arabella funding network, the Tides funding network, the network of Neville Roy Singham, “Foreign Cash,” and “big left wing funders.” It also says some funders “aren’t citizens of this country,” citing Mr. Hansjorg Veiss of Switzerland. The speaker presents three “money facts” about Riot Inc. First, like any corporation, Riot Inc. is described as having many divisions beyond an “anti… boots on the ground division,” including PR, marketing, and a “very well-funded legal division” intended to get “boots on the ground” back on the streets quickly. The transcript states that Riot Inc. has “investors that I mentioned.” Second, the speaker claims “dozens of radical organizations” have received “more than one hundred million dollars” from Riot Inc. investors. These organizations are described as including “lawyer groups” and groups that advocate labeling “good, honest Americans” as “fascists.” Third, the transcript claims “more than one hundred million dollars in US taxpayer funding” flowed into these funding networks, including “at least four million dollars” to “these very groups themselves.” It cites an Atlanta event called “Stop Cop City,” saying “over sixty rioters were charged with domestic terrorism,” and claims these groups received money for that from both “the billionaire class as well as taxpayer money.” The transcript further claims the money helps fund “de-decentralized crowdfunding platforms,” naming groups and references such as “Antifa,” “the John Brown Gun Club of Elm Fork” (stated as having links to an attack on an ice facility), and “the Socialist Rifle Association.” It adds that some crowdfunding platforms are funded by the Riot Inc network, and asserts that lacking LLCs or EIN numbers “doesn’t mean they can’t get paid.” The speaker closes by stating they will “keep following the money” and thanking leadership.

A journalist asks if there’s someone who can be spoken to about hearing, and is directed to the other side of the park. The exchange turns into a broader set of allegations about a man named Naftali Aaron Kranz and the organization Get Free. The speaker claims Naftali Kranz is a paid protester through Get Free. They present LinkedIn posts recruiting for paid protesters for the company, described as Get Free’s “part time mobilization support contractor.” The speaker asserts Get Free bills itself as a grassroots organization while Naftali and others are allegedly paid to protest. They claim Get Free aims to “undo white supremacy” and that one of the best ways to do that, in Naftali’s view, is to celebrate vandalism, citing Crown Heights, where someone threw an egg at a stranger’s cyber truck and placed dog feces on it. The speaker contends Naftali attended an abolish the police rally but was not the leader, instead blending in among other recruits, and that he works with the DSA, explaining why the speaker met him at a DSA Tax the Rich rally. On LinkedIn, the speaker says Naftali frequently posts about paid protester roles, urging people to join to “help us expand our effort to win reparations across the country,” with recruitment across Chicago, the Bay Area, and Baltimore. They describe a nine-week contract, part-time, paying $3,400 in stipends biweekly, seeking someone excited about experimentation who will recruit people and train them to drive turnout at events. The speaker also says Naftali is part of Jews Against Trump and urges donations to bail funds to “bail immigrants out of concentration camps,” adding a claim that a Jewish person who calls an immigration detention center a concentration camp has a serious mental illness, and criticizing colleges like NYU, the Democrat party, and mainstream media as brainwashing. The speaker asserts Nicole Cardi is at the top of the Get Free Movement and claims she says the George Floyd protests were the reason Biden won the 2020 election. They argue that protest NGO groups are about getting Democrats elected, and that donations to Get Free are funneled through ActBlue, which the speaker says is under investigation by the Department of Justice for foreign contributions. The speaker alleges ActBlue has funneled billions to activist groups like Indivisible Twin Cities, which is said to be orchestrating resistance to ICE agents in Minneapolis. Indivisible is claimed to have paid protesters and received over 7,600,000 dollars from the Open Society Foundation, funded by George Soros.

The conversation centers on Matthew Tierman, a former Project Veritas board member, and a leader of numerous provocative claims and confrontations documented over a recent period. The participants describe Tierman as having a long history of intense and sometimes violent rhetoric toward James O’Keefe and others, and they present a narrative in which Tierman asserts deep involvement with and access to multiple federal law enforcement offices. Key remarks and claims include: - Tierman allegedly told an undercover journalist that he “fed the Southern District tons of shit” about James O’Keefe and others to try to get them imprisoned. He also claimed to have been an FBI informant and to have spoken with the SDNY, the FBI, the DOJ, and the IRS, asserting he had “thousands of sources in the Department of Justice and the CIA” and that he spent his days trying to “play stories about corruption.” - He is quoted saying he has worked with law enforcement on various topics and that he has fed the SDNY “tons of shit.” He also claimed he was on an “enemies list” at the DOJ and warned of a potential “perp-w walk” in October, which did not come to pass. - Tierman asserted he has access to and engages with legacy media to target conservative figures and claimed involvement with figures like Tucker Carlson, Charlie Kirk, and Don Jr. He alleged Don Jr. has engaged in insider trading and “crypto schemes” to bribe foreign governments, and he stated that his mission for the next two years is to “make sure [Don Jr.] ends up in prison” because he believes Don Jr. has “stolen a billion dollars from the American people.” - He described a broad, cross-ideological network, claiming to be “on all sides” and to talk to the New York Times and National Review, suggesting he negotiates or interacts with diverse media outlets to pursue stories. - The narrative includes a dramatic incident in which Tierman allegedly shot at a book belonging to James O’Keefe, bragging that he wanted to kill him. The discussion references a “bullet right through my heart” inscription in the book and a confrontation in Miami Beach where undercover reporters approached Tierman to verify his statements about wanting to kill O’Keefe. - The participants recount a prior board meeting on February 6, three years earlier, during which Tierman allegedly threatened to “carve my heart out and eat it” in reference to James O’Keefe. They describe how Veritas used remaining funds in litigation against O’Keefe and how, after his termination, he allegedly sought to involve law enforcement to restrain or arrest him. - Tierman allegedly described his investment ambitions, stating he aims to accumulate “a hundred million dollars” to “weaponize money” and to operate in investment banking to wield financial power, citing industry figures such as Paul Singer as a point of comparison. He claimed to have a broker license and to be involved with several investment entities, including Petragen and Cathayed Incorporated, and he discussed NDA restrictions and conflicts of interest related to his activities while on the Veritas board. - The interview mentions the involvement of George Scackel and the notion that Petragen could be sold to big pharma; it also references a prior defamation suit and ongoing disputes with Veritas, including accusations of misappropriating funds and other misconduct. - The reporters tease that Tierman admitted to working with SDNY and the FBI, and that they intend to pursue further discovery, noting threats and violent imagery used by Tierman toward O’Keefe. They emphasize the dramatic, ongoing tension between Tierman and James O’Keefe, culminating in the live confrontation in Miami and a broader dossier of alleged informant activity. Overall, the piece presents Tierman’s allegations about informant activity, his alleged violent rhetoric toward O’Keefe, his plans to monetize and weaponize money, and his disputes with Project Veritas and its leadership, all culminating in a charged confrontation on the street in Miami.

Speaker 1 identified 48 people as antifa at the Capitol, most of them in disguises. They had Trump flags, American flags, and Trump hats to blend in. Some even entered the Capitol, including a Trumpster and a Viking, who were seen with Nancy Pelosi's daughter and her husband. These individuals are professional agitators from Antifa, not Trump supporters. Additionally, there were people with megaphones discussing the invasion of the Capitol.

In August 2022, while researching the Highland Park mass shooting, I connected with Nama Cates, an ex-Hollywood actress who hosted a podcast called InCells and had shown interest in researching mass shootings. Nama referenced her friend Jade, who shared similar beliefs about accelerationism—a decentralized group of extremists who seek societal collapse and then a fascist regime, functioning as provocateurs who infiltrate movements to incite violence and also engage in nonviolent activism to achieve collapse. I later learned Jade was a military intelligence contractor specializing in counterterrorism who had identified accelerationism as a threat and sounded alarms about it. Sometime in late 2022, Jade tweeted that she used accelerationism research to identify the person who planted pipe bombs at the Capitol prior to January 6. Her online behavior became paranoid and erratic; she released a document online she called a dead man’s switch and then vanished. The Highland Park shooter, Robert Cremo, also known as Awake the Rapper, had hidden clues in an alternate reality game he developed before the shooting. I believed I found a hidden code in one of Cremo’s MP3 files—the spectrographic data—using steganography. Nama expressed interest and claimed that she and her friend Jade were performing the same analysis on the same song file. I did not realize at the time that Nama was sharing our open-source research with a military intelligence asset investigating the same mass shooting in the same way. Over time, Nama and I discussed various related issues, and our relationship remained cordial until I explored the InCel forum that Nama frequently mentioned. Beyond the forum’s pedophilia and glorification of mass shooters, I found a darker reality: it harbored the same accelerationist provocateurs we had discussed. Nama had portrayed herself as impartial, but eventually revealed she was part of the CVE (countering violent extremism) community, a group of academics who pursue grants to study extremist groups and share data with government counterterrorism agencies. This led to the realization that Nama’s INCell Forum was a honeypot operation funded, at least in part, by DHS through the TVTP grant program. Nama revealed that the InCel Forum was a honeypot designed to be monitored by law enforcement and used to make arrests. The arrests targeted largely mentally ill and neurodivergent individuals who wandered into the honeypot, not the obvious terrorists. This raised questions about who was being investigated and why. I searched for Jade Parker, a name Id seen in Nama’s references, and found associations with accelerationism and a guest appearance on Team House, where Jade Parker—a former military intelligence contractor with the Army’s Joint Special Operations Command—discussed her work in cyber warfare against ISIS and her novel accelerationism research. She argued that Capitol Hill protesters were more likely to be exploited by accelerationists than they're actual accelerationists, and that the January 6 crowd could have been manipulated to further divide the country. Jade suggested that accelerationists infiltrated fringe movements like QAnon, January 6, and the InCells. Jade Parker’s writings Jobs included the claim that she identified the identity of the person who planted bombs on Capitol Hill and the associated network, offering this information as worth $100,000 to the Department of Justice. She published a lengthy document titled The Origins of Accelerationism, asserting that she was the first to identify this emerging terror organization and had warned colleagues who dismissed or distorted her work. She alleged that colleagues created research consortiums and excluded her, repurposing her findings to present accelerationism as white supremacist or related to other extremist groups. Jade also connected accelerationism to the Order of Nine Angles (O9A), a satanic neo-Nazi movement, and to the use of online alt realities and OPFERS—unwitting individuals manipulated to commit violence. Jade linked O9A to a broader satanic influence, noting that O9A’s tactics resembled propaganda operations akin to Operation Gladio’s Strategy of Tension, where fear was leveraged to push populations toward authoritarian governance. She cited David Myatt, a founder-like figure in O9A, and suggested connections to Cold War-era networks and Gladio. Jade’s theory posited that Satanism and occult symbolism were not incidental but integral to provocateur operations, with OPFERS being used to incite violence across movements such as white supremacists, neo-Nazis, QAnon, and incels, often facilitated by alternate reality games to create a heroic self-image among vulnerable individuals. The FBI’s links between O9A and the Seven Six Four self-harm and pedophilia cult were noted, though some in the community debated whether Seven Six Four might be a separate FBI operation designed to discredit O9A. Jade’s disappearance occurred soon after July 4, and whether she faced threats or chose to disappear remains unclear. Nama also disappeared after publicly claiming to be stalked by a CVE colleague. As both women who studied the same online phenomena vanished, I released this video to surface the situation and possible connections, while acknowledging that Jade’s and Nama’s without-comment disappearances leave many questions unanswered.

Speaker 1 says a case described by the FBI shows a group moving from being “strangers on TikTok” to “operational planning within three months” on a combined total budget of $1,300. Speaker 1 says the FBI found out about the plot on June 10 and had it “wrapped up within four days,” calling it “a good OSINT puzzle” that is “perfectly wrapped.” Speaker 1 then summarizes the FBI announcement: the FBI “thwarted this attack” at the UFC Freedom 250 match at the White House that took place over the past weekend, which Speaker 1 says kicked off the country’s 250th anniversary celebrations. According to Speaker 1’s description of the FBI case filings released that day, a group calling themselves the Vanguard of the Old found each other on TikTok in March. Speaker 1 says they then moved into encrypted messaging apps including Signal and Telegram and were allegedly planning a coordinated attack targeting government officials and wealthy attendees. Speaker 1 also says the FBI chose to unseal the documents, and that Kash Patel was praised on the record for the FBI’s “rapid response.” Speaker 1 notes Kash Patel was “sitting front row” at the event while taking credit for protection of the weekend. Speaker 1 says the grievances listed in the court documents allege they are anti-government, anti-APAC, anti-capitalist elites, and anti-data centers, described as “fringe beliefs of a minor few.” Speaker 1 adds that these grievances are “things that millions of people are openly talking about” online and that they have been listed as motivations in a single federal terror case. Speaker 1 says an Eskridge affidavit includes a statement that Eskridge was preparing his residence “to be a safe house and making a bunker under the floorboards of his shed,” and Speaker 1 remarks that only one other person had used the word “shed” in a similar context. Speaker 1 then provides a parallel described by Speaker 0 about a “massive underground complex” under a military construction ballroom, where the ballroom becomes a “shed” for what is being built under the military, including “from drones.” Speaker 1 says if the government needed to work the case quickly, it would need “a pretty serious tech stack,” including tools to scrape TikTok content, analyze seized phones, identify “18 unknown people” from encrypted chat fragments, and enable intelligence sharing across four states’ agencies. Speaker 1 then references Oracle and Eris Labs, saying Oracle partnered with an AI company called Eris Labs that “turns user-generated content into searchable military intelligence,” and that Oracle announced the partnership on June 4, about six days before the FBI discovered the plot. Speaker 1 says Oracle would bring the tech stack to a Defense Tech Summit in Brussels on June 25. Speaker 1 concludes by saying there are still 18 suspects at large and that the “sales pitch starts on June 25,” adding that it will be seen which gets resolved first.