According to scholar Thomas Sowell, he questions the link between rising temperatures and carbon dioxide levels, suggesting that the order of events contradicts the idea of man-made global warming. He also criticizes the suppression of opposing viewpoints by those advocating for global warming.
π Post Text
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
One of the world's most respected scholars, Thomas Sowell, on the "man-made global warming" hoax:
"Temperatures went up first, and then there was the increase in carbon dioxide. You canβt say that A causes B if B happens first... But [the scientists] who are pushing global warming are doing their damnedest to make sure that those who believe the opposite don't get heard in the public."
Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=rweblFwt-BM
Follow our backup account: @wide_awake_news
Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia
Subscribe to our newsletter, for daily email updates: https://wide-awake-media.com
Video Transcript AI Summary
Public intellectuals manufacture demand for their services by making alarming predictions and offering solutions to problems. The speaker discusses global warming as an example, stating that it fits the pattern of climate scientists creating a crisis to generate funding for their research. However, the speaker acknowledges that there are scientists who believe in global warming and others who oppose it. The problem lies in the suppression of opposing views by those pushing the global warming narrative. The speaker suggests that climate scientists should be more transparent and push the data to the public, but there is no incentive for them to do so.
Speaker 0: Again intellectuals in society, there is a spontaneous demand from the larger society for the end products of engineering, medical, and scientific professions. But the demand for public intellectuals is largely manufactured by the public intellectuals themselves. Yes. Explain that. How do they manufacture demand for their own services?
Speaker 1: Well, the the one one thing is by, making making alarming predictions, offering, solutions to our Problems.
Speaker 0: What do you make of global warming?
Speaker 1: I think it's a classic example of the need for crusades. Now, people many people are shocked by these emails. I'm not at all shocked by them. I read the original UN study years ago, and I was just curious as to how they were going to deal with the question that the temperatures went up first, and then there was the increase in carbon dioxide. Right.
Because you can't say that a causes b, if b happened first. And so I read this, and I could see they were they were tiptoeing through the tulips and the way they phrase Things and so forth, they couldn't confront that. And now we're finding out, that they knew Don well. They couldn't deal with all the evidence.
Speaker 0: So it fits the pattern of a group of intellectuals, science, climate scientists who have a very narrow competency, suddenly proclaiming that there's a crisis scaring the rest of us, thereby creating a demand for their services.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: Not as climate scientists alone Mhmm. But as a kind of high priestly cast that can tell us all how to live and save the entire Yes. Climate. And in the meantime, generate 1,000,000,000 of dollars worth of government programs to fund their research initiatives. So are you it's a racket.
Speaker 1: Yes. Alright. But but again, you have to take account of the ability of human beings to rationalize. I'm sure there are scientists out there who believe some or much of what they are saying. And there are other scientists who believe the opposite.
But the but the ones who are pushing global warming are doing their damndest to make sure that those who believe the opposite don't get heard in the public.
Speaker 0: So wouldn't there shouldn't there be some large ish body of climate scientists who say, The data really does suggest that we're headed into trouble here. But precisely because my saying so as a climate scientist will look like special pleading, we as a community of scientists should be even more careful about being completely transparent, pushing the data out to the public. They should overcome the hurdle that it looks like self pleading. Why isn't that taking place?
Speaker 1: There's no pay off to that. All right. Imagine if someone is an assistant professor in some department where the where your senior colleagues are going to vote on your pay among other things, I have 1,000,000 of dollars in grants handed out to promote global warming, and you say just what what you've just now said. And they all say, this guy is incorrigible.
Video Not Availableyoutube.com
(The Real) Wide Awake MediaMy original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word!t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.wide-awake-media.com
