@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports
"Under our system of separated powers, the Judicial Branch cannot sit in judgment over a Presidentā€™s official acts. That doctrine is not controversial. It was treated as self-evident and foundational from the dawn of the Republic ...
1/3
@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports
... and it flows directly from the exclusive vesting clause of Article II. In 1803, Chief Justice Marshall endorsed it, writing in Marbury v. Madison that a Presidentā€™s official acts 'can never be examinable by the courts.'
2/3
@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports
President Trumpā€™s public statements and tweets about alleged fraud and irregularity in the federal election fall within the outer perimeter of Presidential duty, to which communicating with the public on matters of federal concern is absolutely central."
3/3
https://x.com/TomFitton/status/1738966112174272799?s=20
